GLASS FIBER TAPE, AND SURFACE MODIFICATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF

20220168976 · 2022-06-02

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    Disclosed are a glass fiber tape, a surface modification method and an application thereof. The surface modification method includes the determination of an optimal decarburizing condition of the glass fiber tape, the decarburization of the glass fiber tape, and the coating of palmitic acid.

    Claims

    1. A surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, comprising: (S1) detecting an initial surface carbon content C.sub.0 of the glass fiber tape; selecting heating temperature and heating time as factors of decarburization; designing five levels for the heating temperature, respectively 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C., and designing three levels for the heating time, respectively 2 h, 3 h and 4 h; designing an orthogonal test based on the five levels for the heating temperature and the three levels for the heating time; subjecting the glass fiber tape to decarburization under different combinations of the heating temperature and the heating time; and after the decarburization, detecting a residual surface carbon content C.sub.1 of the glass fiber tape, and calculating a surface carbon content decline rate N of the glass fiber tape according to the following formula:
    N(%)=(C.sub.0−C.sub.1)/C.sub.0×100%; wherein an optimal decarburizing condition is determined when the surface carbon content decline rate N is more than 70%; (S2) subjecting the glass fiber tape to decarburization under the optimal decarburizing condition determined in step (S1); and (S3) immersing a decarburized glass fiber tape in a palmitic acid solution for 1-3 h, followed by drying.

    2. The surface modification method of claim 1, further comprising: after decarburization in step (S2), detecting an actual residual surface carbon content C2 of the glass fiber tape; if an actual surface carbon content decline rate N′ of the glass fiber tape is more than 70%, performing step (S3), otherwise, performing step (S2) until the actual surface carbon content decline rate N′ of the glass fiber tape is more than 70%; wherein the actual surface carbon content decline rate N′ is calculated through the following formula:
    N′(%)=(C.sub.0−C.sub.2)/C.sub.0×100%.

    3. The surface modification method of claim 1, wherein the palmitic acid solution in step (S3) is a mixture of palmitic acid and ethanol, and a mass ratio of the palmitic acid to the ethanol is 5-10:100.

    4. The surface modification method of claim 3, wherein a mass ratio of the palmitic acid to the ethanol is 8:100.

    5. The surface modification method of claim 1, wherein in step (S3), the decarburized glass fiber tape is immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 1-3 h, and then vertically dried in air.

    6. A glass fiber tape, wherein the glass fiber tape is prepared by the surface modification method of claim 1.

    7. An insulation structure for a superconducting magnet, wherein the insulation structure is made of the glass fiber tape of claim 6.

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0024] FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape according to an embodiment of the disclosure;

    [0025] FIG. 2 is a thermogravimetry (TG) diagram of the glass fiber tape before and after decarburization according to an embodiment of the disclosure; and

    [0026] FIG. 3 is a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) diagram of the glass fiber tape before and after the decarburization according to an embodiment of the disclosure;

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

    [0027] To render the objects, technical solutions, and advantages of the present disclosure clearer, the disclosure will be described in detail below with reference to the embodiments.

    EXAMPLE 1

    [0028] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, including a surface decarburization process and a palmitic acid coating process, which was specifically performed as follows.

    [0029] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0030] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties (the strength retention reached 20% or more), the optimal decarburizing condition was considered to be 500° C. for 4 h.

    [0031] (S2) Decarburization

    [0032] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1). The decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was sampled to detect the surface carbon content, where those with a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more were considered qualified, and the unqualified products needed to be re-decarburized.

    [0033] (S3) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0034] 120 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Surface element content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape before and after decarburization Surface element content (%) C O Si Al Mg Before decarburization 67.61 25.52 4.34 1.73 0.8 After decarburization 15.32 51.82 20.17 7.79 4.9

    [0035] As shown in Table 1, the initial surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was 67.61%, while after decarburization, the surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was 15.32%, namely, a surface carbon content decline rate of 77.34%, indicating that through the decarburization, the content of the sizing agent on the surface of the HS/6 glass fiber tape could be reduced to a reasonable range.

    [0036] It could be seen from FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 that after the decarburization, the thermal weight loss of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was lower, and there were no obvious endothermic/exothermic peaks, indicating that most of the sizing agent on the surface of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was removed.

    EXAMPLE 2

    [0037] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, including a surface decarburization process and a palmitic acid coating process. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Example 2, after the decarburization, the detection of the actual residual surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was omitted. The surface modification method provided herein was specifically performed as follows.

    [0038] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0039] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties, to obtain the optimal decarburizing condition.

    [0040] (S2) Decarburization

    [0041] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1).

    [0042] (S3) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0043] 120 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    EXAMPLE 3

    [0044] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, including a surface decarburization process and a palmitic acid coating process. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Example 3, a mass ratio of the palmitic acid to the ethanol was 5:100. The surface modification method provided herein was specifically performed as follows.

    [0045] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0046] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties, to obtain the optimal decarburizing condition.

    [0047] (S2) Decarburization

    [0048] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1). The decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was sampled to detect the surface carbon content, where those with a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more were considered qualified, and the unqualified products needed to be re-decarburized.

    [0049] (S3) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0050] 75 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    EXAMPLE 4

    [0051] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, including a surface decarburization process and a palmitic acid coating process. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Example 4, a mass ratio of the palmitic acid to the ethanol was 10:100. The surface modification method provided herein was specifically performed as follows.

    [0052] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0053] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties, to obtain the optimal decarburizing condition.

    [0054] (S2) Decarburization

    [0055] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1). The decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was sampled to detect the surface carbon content, where those with a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more were considered qualified, and the unqualified products needed to be re-decarburized.

    [0056] (S3) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0057] 150 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    Comparative Example 1

    [0058] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Comparative Example 1, the determination of an optical decarburizing condition and the decarburization of the HS/6 glass fiber tape were omitted. The surface modification method provided herein was described in detail below.

    [0059] (S1) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0060] 120 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    Comparative Example 2

    [0061] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Comparative Example 2, the coating of palmitic acid was omitted. The surface modification method provided herein was described in detail below.

    [0062] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0063] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties, to obtain the optimal decarburizing condition.

    [0064] (S2) Decarburization

    [0065] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1). The decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was sampled to detect the surface carbon content, where those with a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more were considered qualified, and the unqualified products needed to be re-decarburized.

    Comparative Example 3

    [0066] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, including a surface decarburization process and a palmitic acid coating process. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Comparative Example 3, a mass ratio of the palmitic acid to the ethanol was 2:100. The surface modification method provided herein was specifically performed as follows.

    [0067] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0068] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties, to obtain the optimal decarburizing condition.

    [0069] (S2) Decarburization

    [0070] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1). The decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was sampled to detect the surface carbon content, where those with a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more were considered qualified, and the unqualified products needed to be re-decarburized.

    [0071] (S3) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0072] 30 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    Comparative Example 4

    [0073] Provided was a surface modification method of a glass fiber tape, including a surface decarburization process and a palmitic acid coating process. The surface modification method provided herein was different from that in Example 1 that in Comparative Example 4, a mass ratio of the palmitic acid to the ethanol was 12:100. The surface modification method provided herein was specifically performed as follows.

    [0074] (S1) Determining an Optimal Decarburizing Condition of the Glass Fiber Tape

    [0075] An appropriate amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was cut and subjected to air-heating treatment (heating and cooling with the furnace) at 400° C., 450° C., 500° C., 550° C. and 600° C. for 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, respectively. After that, a surface carbon content of the HS/6 glass fiber tape treated under different conditions was detected, and the thermal treatment condition corresponding to a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more was considered qualified. Combining with the mechanical properties, to obtain the optimal decarburizing condition.

    [0076] (S2) Decarburization

    [0077] A certain amount of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was completely loosened to avoid affecting the volatilization and reaction of the sizing agent, and then transferred to a muffle furnace to undergo the decarburization treatment under the optimal condition determined in step (S1). The decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was sampled to detect the surface carbon content, where those with a surface carbon content decline rate of 70% or more were considered qualified, and the unqualified products needed to be re-decarburized.

    [0078] (S3) Coating of Palmitic Acid

    [0079] 180 g of palmitic acid was added to 1500 g of ethanol to obtain a mixture, which was heated to 38° C. using a heating plate and stirred with a magnetic stirring device to obtain a palmitic acid solution. Then the decarburized HS/6 glass fiber tape was immersed in the palmitic acid solution at room temperature for 2 h, and vertically dried in air.

    Experimental Example 1

    [0080] The HS/6 glass fiber tapes prepared in Examples 1-4 and Comparative Examples 1-4 were subjected to a mechanical testing (referring to GB/T7689.5). The testing results were shown in Table. 2.

    TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Mechanical testing results of the HS/6 glass fiber tapes Mechanical property (N/25 mm) Example 1 516.8 Example 2 519 Example 3 498.6 Example 4 521.8 Comparative 1981.2 Example 1 Comparative 421.2 Example 2 Comparative 450.6 Example 3 Comparative 484.2 Example 4

    [0081] It could be seen from Table 2 that the strength of the HS/6 glass fiber tape decreased after the decarburization owing to the absence of sizing agent. After the modification of the palmitic acid, the strength of the HS/6 glass fiber tape was enhanced.

    Experimental Example 2

    [0082] The HS/6 glass fiber tapes prepared in Example 1, and Comparative Examples 1-2 were selected to manufacture a glass fiber tape-resin composite material, which was specifically described below.

    [0083] (S1) A resin system was prepared from 60 parts by weight of bisphenol-F diglycidyl ether (GY 282), 40 parts by weight of a curing agent (diethyltoluenediamine), and 21 parts by weight of a diluting agent (polypropylene glycol diglycidyl ether).

    [0084] (S2) The glass fiber tape was enveloped around a 304 stainless steel panel in a half-lapping form to undergoes a vacuum-heat treatment at 640° C. for 4 h.

    [0085] (S3) The glass fiber tape was impregnated into the resin system under vacuum pressure, followed by glue injection, curing, and demoulding to obtain the glass fiber tape-resin composite material.

    [0086] The insulation strength and mechanical property of the glass fiber tape-resin composite material were tested, and the test results were shown in Table 3. A comparison between the Example 1 and the Comparative Example 1 indicated that through the decarburization, the insulation strength of the glass fiber tape-resin composite material was enhanced, while the mechanical property of the glass fiber tape-resin composite material was lowered. A comparison between the Example 1 and the Comparative Example 2 indicated that through the modification by the palmitic acid, the mechanical property of the glass fiber tape-resin composite material was enhanced.

    TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Insulation strength and mechanical property comparison of the glass fiber tape-resin composite materials Insulation strength Mechanical property (breakdown voltage) (0° tensile MPa) Example 1 Failed to breakdown at 100 kV 272 Comparative 60 403 Example 1 Comparative Failed to breakdown at 100 kV 245 Example 2

    [0087] It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, and not intended to limit the scope of the present application. Although the present application has been described in detail above, it should be understood that any modifications, replacements and improvements made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present application shall fall within the scope of the present application defined by the appended claims.