Processes for increasing hydrocarbon production

Abstract

Systems and methods for increasing hydrocarbon production using an electrical submersible pump are described. The methods typically include, for example, configuring an electrical submersible pump comprising a gas separator to induce a gas lift effect in a well comprising a tubing within a casing. Hydrocarbon production from the well is therefore increased using the electrical submersible pump.

Claims

1. A process for increasing hydrocarbon production using an electrical submersible pump comprising: configuring an electrical submersible pump comprising a gas separator to induce a gas lift effect in a well wherein the well comprises a central tubing within a casing such that an annulus is formed between the central tubing and the casing; and producing hydrocarbons from the well with the electrical submersible pump such that reservoir fluid is produced up the central tubing and a mixture comprising reservoir gas and reservoir fluid is produced up the annulus, wherein the configuring step comprises suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing such that velocity of a gas separated by the gas separator is above a critical velocity of reservoir fluid from the well.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the gas lift effect is induced in the absence of injecting gas into the well from the surface.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein the configuring step comprises suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing such that the central tubing within the casing comprises a casing clearance which is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

4. The process of claim 3, wherein the hydrocarbons produced from the well wherein the casing clearance is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump are at least 5% up to 20% than a process without said casing clearance of less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

5. The process of claim 3, wherein the hydrocarbons produced from the well wherein the casing clearance is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump are about the same or more than a process without said casing clearance of less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump and wherein the process uses at least 6% up to 29% horsepower over the time of a given electrical submersible pump (ESP) run.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein the configuring step comprises suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing such that the central tubing within the casing comprises a casing clearance which is less than about 20% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein the configuring step comprises suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing and employing one or more additional tubing strings into the annulus that extend at least from a surface into the well and terminate uphole from the electrical submersible pump wherein the sum of diameters of the central tubing and the one or more additional tubing strings is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

8. The process of claim 7 wherein the mixture comprising reservoir gas and reservoir fluid is produced up the annulus wherein at least a portion of the mixture comprising reservoir gas and reservoir fluid produced up the annulus passes through the one or more additional tubing strings.

9. The process of claim 7 wherein the one or more additional tubing strings comprise a smaller diameter than the central tubing.

10. The process of claim 1 wherein the configuring step comprises suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing and employing one or more additional tubing strings into the annulus that extend at least from a surface into the well and terminate uphole from the electrical submersible pump wherein the sum of diameters of the central tubing and the one or more additional tubing strings is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

11. The process of claim 1 wherein the separation efficiency of the gas separator is from about 60 to about 100%.

12. The process of claim 1 wherein the electrical submersible pump has an intake pressure below the bubble point of the reservoir.

13. The process of claim 1, wherein critical velocity of reservoir fluid varies depending upon cross-sectional flow area, or wellhead pressure.

14. A system for increasing hydrocarbon production using an electrical submersible pump comprising: a well comprising a central tubing within a casing wherein the central tubing comprises a fluid exit opening near a surface of the well and a fluid entrance opening downhole; an electrical submersible pump suspended from the fluid entrance opening of the central tubing; wherein the electrical submersible pump comprises a pump operably connected to the fluid entrance opening of the central tubing, a gas separator operably connected to the pump, and a motor operably connected to the gas separator; wherein the system is configured to produce reservoir fluid up the central tubing and to produce a mixture comprising reservoir fluid and reservoir gas up an annulus between the central tubing and the casing; wherein the system is configured to induce a gas lift effect in the absence of injecting gas into the well from the surface by suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing such that velocity of a gas separated by the gas separator is above a critical velocity of reservoir fluid from the well.

15. The system of claim 14 which further comprises: one or more tubing strings uphole from the electrical submersible pump wherein the one or more tubing strings are in the annulus between the casing and the central tubing wherein the one or more tubing strings are configured to produce a mixture comprising reservoir fluid and reservoir gas up the annulus through the one or more tubing strings.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein at least one tubing string is smaller in cross-section than the central tubing.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein the central tubing within the casing comprises a casing clearance which is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

18. The system of claim 14, wherein the central tubing within the casing comprises a casing clearance which is less than about 30% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump.

19. The system of claim 14, wherein critical velocity of reservoir fluid varies depending upon cross-sectional flow area, or wellhead pressure.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Various embodiments of the present disclosure, together with further objects and advantages, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

(2) FIG. 1A depicts an ESP installation using an annulus between the central tubing and casing as a second fluid production flow path.

(3) FIG. 1B depicts an ESP installation using a second tubing string as an additional fluid production flow path.

(4) FIG. 1C depicts an ESP installation using three tubing strings as additional fluid production flow paths.

(5) FIG. 2 depicts a nodal analysis comparing conventional production methods vs. the methods described herein.

(6) FIG. 3 depicts a second nodal analysis comparing conventional production methods vs. the methods described herein

(7) FIG. 4 depicts a third nodal analysis comparing conventional production methods vs. the methods described herein.

(8) FIG. 5 depicts a fourth nodal analysis comparing conventional production methods vs. the methods described herein.

(9) FIG. 6 shows critical velocities as related to wellhead pressure and flow rate.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(10) The following description of embodiments provides a non-limiting representative examples referencing numerals to particularly describe features and teachings of different aspects of the invention. The embodiments described should be recognized as capable of implementation separately, or in combination, with other embodiments from the description of the embodiments. A person of ordinary skill in the art reviewing the description of embodiments should be able to learn and understand the different described aspects of the invention. The description of embodiments should facilitate understanding of the invention to such an extent that other implementations, not specifically covered but within the knowledge of a person of skill in the art having read the description of embodiments, would be understood to be consistent with an application of the invention.

(11) The systems and methods disclosed herein generally relate to systems and methods for increasing hydrocarbon production from a well by, for example, inducing gas lift and then producing hydrocarbons from the well with an electrical submersible. That is, a process for increasing hydrocarbon production may be employed that uses an electrical submersible pump. The specific electrical submersible pump is not particularly critical and may be any conventional electrical submersible pump known in the art. Particularly suitable electrical submersible pumps are those employing a gas separator such as those described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 10,822,933 which is incorporated by reference. The electrical submersible pumps used herein may comprise a pump module, a motor such as a permanent magnet motor, and a gas separator between the pump module and motor.

(12) As is known in the art, typical wells comprise a central tubing within a casing. Advantageously, the processes and systems used herein may induce gas lift in the absence of injecting gas into the well from the surface simply by configuring the electrical submersible pump within the well as described herein. Of course, injecting gas into the well from the surface may further induce gas lift.

(13) Configuring the electrical submersible pump within the well may be accomplished in any convenient manner so long as the desired gas lift effect is achieved. In some cases the configuring step may comprise suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing such that reservoir fluid is produced up the central tubing and a mixture comprising reservoir gas and reservoir fluid is produced up the annulus. As used herein reservoir gas may comprise a hydrocarbon, carbon dioxide, other gases, and mixtures thereof. The present methods and systems are typically employed to induce gas lift without injecting gas into the well from the surface. However, if gas has been previously injected, then it may also form a portion of reservoir gas.

(14) The configuring step may comprise suspending the electrical submersible pump from the central tubing such that velocity of a gas separated by the gas separator is preferably above a critical velocity for the well. Critical velocity may vary depending upon such factors as cross-sectional flow area, wellhead pressure, and the like as shown in FIG. 6. Thus, to achieve a condition where the velocity of gas separated by the gas separator is above a critical velocity the critical velocity may somehow be reduced and/or a velocity of the gas separated by the gas separator may be increased. Generally, it has been discovered that this may accomplished by configuring the respective geometries (such as shown in FIGS. 1A-1C) within the pump to overcome and/or ensure the gas velocity is at equal to or above the critical velocity of reservoir fluid. In this manner the velocity of gas up the annulus (with or without added tubing strings) is sufficient to lift reservoir fluid up the annulus with the gas (which annulus may have one or more additional tubing strings within it). It has been discovered that critical velocity is related to, for example, a cross-sectional area of clearance between a central tubing (and the sum of any additional tubing strings), if employed, as well as perhaps wellhead pressure and to a lesser extent perhaps density of any reservoir fluid.

(15) In some embodiments the gas lift effect herein is advantageously induced in the absence of injecting gas into the well from the surface. That is, a clearance between the central tubing (including any additional tubing strings) and the casing is sufficient to achieve and/or induce a desired gas lift effect. This may be accomplished in many different manners depending upon the specific electrical submersible pump, casing, tubing, and other parameters. In some embodiments it has been found that the pump, casing, central tubing and, if present, any additional tubing strings, should be configured such that the casing clearance wherein the pump is suspended is less than about 30%, or less than about 25%, or less than about 20%, or less than about 18%, or less than about 15%, or less than about 10%, or less than about 8% of the casing diameter. In the cases wherein one or more additional tubing strings are employed into the annulus that extend at least from a surface into the well and terminate uphole from the electrical submersible pump, then the sum of diameters of the central tubing and the one or more additional tubing strings is usually less than about 30% less, or than about 25%, or less than about 20%, or less than about 18%, or less than about 15%, or less than about 10%, or less than about 8% of the casing diameter uphole from the electrical submersible pump. In this manner, at least a portion of the mixture comprising reservoir gas and reservoir fluid produced up the annulus may pass through, if present, the one or more, e.g., two, three, or four or more additional tubing strings. It is not particularly critical where any additional tubing strings that extend into the annulus terminate so long as they terminate uphole of the electrical submersible pump as shown in FIGS. 1B and 1C. In some embodiments, it may be desirable to have the additional tubing terminate uphole and close to the electrical submersible pump, e.g., within 500 feet, or within 400 feet, or within 300 feet, or within 200 feet, or within 100 feet, or within 50 feet, or even closer depending upon the well configuration and parameters.

(16) While not wishing to be bound to any particular theory it is believed that the “tighter” configuration, for example, less than about 30% clearance described above, facilitates gas lift up the annulus which may include one or more 2nd flow paths which flow paths may be the annulus between the central tubing and casing and, of course, may also include any one or more tubing strings within the annulus. That is, in some cases the annulus between the central tubing and the casing may include a second, and/or third and/or fourth or more tubing strings.

(17) Advantageously, a desired tighter clearance may be accomplished in a number of ways. For example, as shown in FIG. 1A, the desired casing clearance 100 may be configured by selecting the pump diameter at an appropriate location, e.g., at or above the ESP gas separator in this instance, such that flow path 2 in FIG. 1A (the annulus between the tubing and casing) adjacent the pump is within the desired casing clearances described above. Alternatively or additionally, desired casing clearances may be accomplished by employing additional tubing strings, e.g., one, or two, or three or more additional tubing strings. FIG. 1B shows the casing clearance 100 configured for the desired tighter fit in the region of a second tubing which creates at least one flow path 2 for enhancing gas lift.

(18) FIG. 1C shows a casing clearance 100 configured for the desired tighter fit in the region of a second, third, and/or fourth or more tubing which creates additional flow paths 2 or more for enhancing gas lift. In the case of adding a second, third, and/or a fourth or more tubing string each tubing string may be of the same diameter in cross-section and length and/or of different diameters and lengths so long as the desired gas lift effect is achieved due to the casing clearance and/or annulus describe above. In some specific embodiments the second, third, and/or a fourth tubing string are uphole from the pump and up to all of the tubing strings may be smaller in cross-section than the central tubing from which the pump is suspended. In most circumstances hydrocarbon fluids are produced up the tubing on which the pump is suspended while reservoir fluid, reservoir gas, and mixtures thereof are produced up the annulus between the tubing and the casing which annulus may include the one or more added tubing strings such as those shown in FIGS. 1B and 1C.

(19) Advantageously, using the configurations described herein hydrocarbons produced from the well may be at least about 3%, or at least 5%, or at least 10%, or at least 20%, or more than a comparable process without the configuring step as shown in the data below. Similarly, horsepower or energy consumed for the production process may be diminished by at least 5%, or at least 10%, or at least 20% or more than a comparable process without the configuring step or other methods and systems described herein. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons produced from a well configured as described herein may be about the same or more than a comparable process without the configuring step wherein the comparable process uses more horsepower over the time of a given ESP run.

(20) The table below shows representative casing and tubing sizes that may be employed in combination to induce gas lift. The casing clearance as a percent of the casing diameter is shown in the “clearance” column.

(21) TABLE-US-00001 Casing Tubing Clearance Size ID (in) Size OD (in) (in) (% of Dc) 7.000″ 26.00 ppf 6.276 3.500″ 9.30 ppf 3.500 1.3880 22.1% 7.000″ 26.00 ppf 6.276 2.875″ 6.50 ppf 2.875 1.7005 27.1% 5.500″ 17.00 ppf 4.892 2.875″ 6.50 ppf 2.875 1.0085 20.6% 5.500″ 17.00 ppf 4.892 2.375″ 4.70 ppf 2.375 1.2585 25.7% 5.000″ 15.00 ppf 4.408 2.375″ 4.70 ppf 2.375 1.0165 23.1%

Example 1

(22) The methods described above are employed on a well with the parameters shown in the table below.

(23) TABLE-US-00002 Well Parameters Perf Datum: 11,300′ TVD Kick Off Point: 10,850′ TVD Casing: 7.000″ 20 ppff ESP Tubing: 2.875″ 6.5 ppf Dual Lift Tubing: 2.375″ 4.7 ppf Est. Reservoir Pressure: 5400 PSI ESP Description: 528 stages of 3000 Barrels Per Day pump stage

(24) TABLE-US-00003 Well Productivity Test WH Pressure: 800 PSI Oil Rate: 875 BPD Water Rate: 1105 BPD Gas Rate: 1000 MCF Test BH Flowing Pressure: 3900 PSI

(25) Potential horsepower savings using the methods described herein on the well described above is shown below.

(26) TABLE-US-00004 Dual Lift Example-HP Savings Projection Gas Fluid Est. Total Takeaway- Takeaway- Power Power Reservoir Fluid Total Dual Lift Dual Lift Requirements- Requirements- HP Pressure Prod Gas Prod PIP String String ESP Only Dual Lift Reduction (PSI) (BPD) (MCFD) (PSI) (MCFD) (%) (Freq) (HP) (Freq) (HP) % 5400 3000 1650 2650  165  0 57 225 57 225  0 4600 3000 1800 1800  774 20 63 311 56 221 29 4000 2500 1750 1350 1050 12 62 300 58 244 19 3000 2000 1400 1000  840  5 60 269 59 254  6 2200 1500 1050  680  840  4 59 249 59 249  0 1700 1000  700  640  560  3 56 211 56 206  2

(27) Potential production increase using the methods described herein on the well described above is shown below.

(28) TABLE-US-00005 Dual Lift Example-Production Uplift Total Total Gas Fluid Fluid Takeaway- Est. Prod- Prod- Total Dual Reservoir ESP Dual Gas Lift ESP Power Production Pressure Only Lift Prod PIP String Requirements Uplift (PSI) (BPD) (BPD) (MCFD) (PSI) (MCFD) (Freq) (HP) % 5400 3000 3000 1650 2650  165 57 225  0 5200 3000 3600 2160 1800  929 63 311 20 4100 2500 2800 1960 1350 1176 62 300 12 3100 2000 2100 1470 1000  882 60 269  5 2400 1500 1560 1092  680  874 59 249  4 1700 1000 1030  721  640  577 56 211  3

(29) FIGS. 2 and 3 show a nodal analysis comparing conventional production methods vs. the methods described herein. As shown in FIG. 2 employing the methods and systems described herein may result in reduced energy requirements while FIG. 3 shows employing the methods and systems described herein may additionally or alternative result in increased production.

Example 2

(30) The methods described above are employed on a well with the parameters shown in the table below.

(31) TABLE-US-00006 Well Parameters Perf Datum: 9,950′ TVD Kick Off Point: 9,250′ TVD Casing: 5.500″ 23 ppff ESP Tubing: 2.875″ 6.5 ppf Dual Lift Takeaway: 5.5″ × 2.875″ Annulus Est. Reservoir Pressure: 4000 PSI ESP Description: 268 stages of 4000 Barrels Per Day

(32) TABLE-US-00007 Well Productivity Test WH Pressure: 400 PSI Oil Rate: 600 BPD Water Rate: 3400 BPD Gas Rate: 1500 MCF Test BH Flowing Pressure: 2800 PSI

(33) Potential horsepower savings using the methods described herein on the well described above is shown below.

(34) TABLE-US-00008 Gas Fluid Takeaway- Takeaway- Power Power Duel Lift Dual Lift Requirements- Requirements- HP PIP String String ESP Only Dual Lift Reduction (PSI) (MCFD) (%) (Freq) (HP) (Freq) (HP) % 2170 1350 53 60 258 40  68 74 1700 1440 44 63 296 50 125 58 1540 1440 41 60 249 53 143 43 1400 1440 39 60 246 54 143 42 1100 1260 23 62 249 61 201 19  850 1080 13 65 249 65 241  3

(35) Potential production increase using the methods described herein on the well described above is shown below.

(36) TABLE-US-00009 Total Total Gas Est. Fluid Fluid Takeaway- Reservoir Prod- Prod- Total Dual Lift ESP Power Production Pressure ESP Only Dual Lift Gas Prod PIP String Requirements Uplift (PSI) (BPD) (BPD) (MCFD) (PSI) (MCFD) (Freq) (HP) % 4000 4000 5200 2300 1700 2070 63 296 30 3800 3800 4500 2250 1540 2025 61 250 18 3400 3400 3900 2200 1400 1980 60 250 15 2600 2600 2950 1700 1100 1530 61 250 13 2000 2050 2250 1700  850 1530 63 250 10

(37) FIGS. 4 and 5 show a nodal analysis comparing conventional production methods vs. the methods described herein. As shown in FIG. 4 employing the methods and systems described herein may result in reduced energy requirements while FIG. 5 shows employing the methods and systems described herein may additionally or alternative result in increased production.

(38) In the preceding specification, various embodiments have been described with references to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded as an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.