SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF MICRO-CONTAMINANTS FROM SLUDGE
20230265000 · 2023-08-24
Inventors
- Pierre-Emmanuel PARDO (ORSAY, FR)
- Sylvain DONNAZ (RICHEBOURG, FR)
- Adriana GONZALEZ OSPINA (MONTESSON, FR)
Cpc classification
C02F11/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02W10/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02W10/20
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02W10/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02E50/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
C02F11/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A method for selectively removing micro-contaminants from sludge, the method includes a) providing sludge contaminated with micro-contaminants, and b) subjecting the sludge to a primary treatment step, thereby producing a first stream of primary sludge comprising a first part of micro-contaminants and a second stream of remaining sludge comprising a second part of micro-contaminants, c) subjecting the second stream of remaining sludge to a secondary treatment step, thereby producing biological sludge, wherein the first stream of primary sludge and the biological sludge are further subjected to separate treatment steps whose effects are coupled, so as to divert, capture and destroy the first part of micro-contaminants in the primary treatment step.
Claims
1. A method for selectively removing micro-contaminants from sludge, said method comprising: a) providing wastewater contaminated with micro-contaminants, and b) subjecting said wastewater to a primary treatment step, thereby producing a first stream of primary sludge comprising a first part of micro-contaminants and a second stream of remaining wastewater comprising a second part of micro-contaminants, c) subjecting the second stream of remaining wastewater to a secondary treatment step, thereby producing biological sludge, d) subjecting the first stream of primary sludge to an incineration step, thereby eliminating the primary sludge and the first part of micro-contaminants and producing ashes and heat, f1) anaerobic digestion of the biological sludge, thereby producing methane and a solid product; and/or recovering the biological sludge for land application.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step e) of subjecting the biological sludge to a thermal conditioning step, the anaerobic digestion being performed upstream or downstream the thermal conditioning.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the heat produced in step d) is provided to the thermal conditioning step e).
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first part of micro-contaminants is greater than the second part of micro-contaminants.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step f2) of recovering nutrients from the digested sludge after the step of anaerobic digestion.
6. The method of claim 2, wherein the anaerobic digestion (step f1) is an anaerobic digestion (step g) leading to a digestate and a gaseous fraction containing methane, and the step of thermal conditioning (step h) is performed downstream the anaerobic digestion (step f1), the thermal conditioning (step h) being an Hydro Thermal Carbonization (HTC), thereby producing the solid product.
7. The method of claim 2, wherein the thermal conditioning step is a Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) (step i) thereby producing hydrolyzed sludge, and the anaerobic digestion is performed downstream the THP, the anaerobic digestion being an anaerobic digestion (step g) of the hydrolyzed sludge, thereby producing a digestate and a gaseous fraction containing methane.
8. The method of claim 6, further comprising a step j) of separating the digestate of the step g) into a liquid fraction and a solid fraction.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the solid product from the HTC step and/or the solid fraction from the step j) is suitable for use as fertilizer, in particular as a fertilizer to be spread on land.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first stream of primary sludge is subjected to an anaerobic treatment step k) prior to being subjected to step d).
11. The method of claim 1, comprising a step n) of oxidizing the secondary sludge before the step f1) of anaerobic digestion.
12. An installation for selectively removing micro-contaminants from sludge, said installation comprising: a) a first tank having a first inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet, the first tank being configured to be fed at the first inlet with wastewater contaminated with micro-contaminants and to produce: a. a first stream of primary sludge comprising a first part of micro-contaminants recovered at the first outlet; b. a second stream of remaining wastewater comprising a second part of micro-contaminants recovered at the second outlet; b) a biological tank, suitable for aerobic bacteria oxidation, anoxic or anaerobic bacteria metabolism, having a first inlet, and a first outlet, the first inlet being in fluid connection with the second outlet of the first tank, the biological tank being configured to be fed at the first inlet with the second stream of remaining wastewater and to produce biological sludge recovered at the first outlet; the installation being further configured to perform anaerobic digestion of the biological sludge, thereby producing methane and a solid product; and/or the biological sludge being recovered for land application; c) an incineration workshop having a first inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet, the first inlet being in fluid connection with the first outlet of the first tank, the incineration workshop being configured to be fed at the first inlet with the first stream of primary sludge and to eliminate the primary sludge and the first part of micro-contaminants and to produce ashes recovered at the first outlet and heat recovered at the second outlet.
13. The installation of claim 12, further comprising a thermal conditioner having a first inlet, a second inlet and a first outlet, the first inlet being in fluid connection with the first outlet of the biological tank, the thermal conditioner being configured to be fed at the first inlet with biological sludge, the thermal conditioner being suitable at least for a Hydro Thermal Carbonization (HTC) or a Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP).
14. The installation of claim 13, wherein the second outlet of the incineration workshop is in fluid connection with the second inlet of the thermal conditioner, the thermal conditioner being further configured to be fed at the second inlet with the heat recovered at the second outlet of the incineration workshop.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0062] The accompanying drawings illustrate various non-limiting, exemplary, innovative aspects in accordance with the present description:
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
DETAILED DISCLOSURE
[0066]
[0067] The secondary treatment step is a biological treatment step. The biological treatment is a treatment in which micro-organisms intervene to decompose the matter in the remaining wastewater subjected to the biological treatment. Examples of biological treatments are aerobic bacteria oxidation or anoxic or anaerobic bacteria metabolism for carbonaceous, nitrogen or phosphorous removal.
[0068] Incineration includes any treatment enabling the transformation of organic matter into carbon dioxide and eventually in carbon. Incineration can also be a pyrolysis or a gasification. Incineration takes place in an incineration workshop having at least two outlets: one outlet is dedicated to the heat recovery and the other outlet is dedicated to ash recovery.
[0069] The incineration generally contains a dehydration step to mechanically remove as much water as possible before incineration. Since micro-contaminants are preferentially captured in the first stream 11, so are they in this dehydration step due to the same adsorption phenomena. When removing water from a stream, micro-contaminants remain with the sludge part and the removed water has a very low micro-contaminant concentration.
[0070] All the steps of dehydration and/or mechanical or gravitational thickening do not significantly modify the distribution of micro-contaminants which remain in the solid phase. The micro-contaminants present in the sludge phase remain in the dehydrated/thickened sludge.
[0071] It is to be noticed that the steps of digestion comprise a step of thickening, so that as little water as possible is introduced in the digester. In other words, even not shown in the figures for a better readability, upstream the digestion, there is a step of mechanical or gravitational thickening that does not modify the stream of micro-contaminants that remain in the solid matrix. Upstream the incineration and upstream the THP, there is a step of dehydration, that does not modify the stream of micro-contaminants either. The liquid fractions recovered from these steps of thickening and/or dehydration are returned at the inlet of the plant or to prior steps of the process. This stream of recovered liquid fractions is advantageously subjected to an additional specific treatment for destroying microcontaminants (more specifically micropollutants), such as an oxidation step. In any case, the concentration of microcontaminants into the recovered liquid fractions is of second order as compared to the incoming flow of wastewater 10. These liquids only circulate inside the wastewater treatment plant to exit through the usual flows. It is transparent in regards of the balance sheet of the wastewater treatment plant.
[0072] The method according to the invention is based on the segregation of the wastewater 10 contaminated with micro-contaminants upstream the incineration and only the primary sludge 12 is treated through incineration. Therefore, the incineration workshop burns only the primary sludge 12, that is to say the bad sludge containing most of the micro-contaminants (between 20 wt. % and 80 wt. % of the micro-contaminants of the wastewater depending on the sludge to be treated). The valuable sludge, that is to say the sludge full of nutrients suitable for biosolids reuse in soils, is not burnt and can be recovered and valued for further uses. Additionally, since only the primary sludge is directed to the incineration step (d), the incineration workshop can be of a smaller dimension as those used in the prior art that burn mixed sludge. The solution proposed by the invention is therefore less CAPEX intensive.
[0073] More precisely, the primary sludge is the result of particulate settling matter which settles very quickly and which is rather mineral matter, or inert organic matter. This primary sludge captures about 20 to 80 wt. %, and more often about 50 to 60 wt. %, of heavy metals and approximately 20 wt. % of pharmaceuticals from the wastewater contaminated with micro-contaminants. On the other hand, the biological sludge is a less particulate pollution. It is a mixture of particulate and soluble fractions biodegradable and not biodegradable in which the bacteria's converts the biodegradable dissolved pollution into CO2 or N2 by mineralization. The process results in a bacteria's growth and particulate matter accumulation that generates sludge production. The active biological sludge is maintained into the biological reactor at about 5 g/L, preferentially between 2 and 3 g/L. This quantity of biomass being in contact with the colloidal and dissolved solution generates a phenomenon of adsorption of micro-contaminants on the biomass that is biological sludge. Therefore it should be pointed out that the biological sludge is almost free of micro-contaminants but may still contain a small amount of micro-contaminants. That is why it may be necessary to further treat the biological sludge as explained below.
[0074] The invention enables to take into account two different adsorption mechanisms, each with a different kinetics. This means that the adsorption rates of the micro-contaminants on the sludge are different. The way to segregate the wastewater into two streams and each stream being intended to be submitted to its own treatment allows taking into account these differences. The invention allows the selective removal of micro-contaminants from sludge.
[0075] The invention represents a new approach of sludge incineration. Indeed, in the prior art, sludge incineration is based on large furnaces and incineration solutions (the bigger the better). When a sludge incineration solution is sold, the objective is to burn as much sludge as possible to secure the source of product and ensure the payback of the large infrastructure. Therefore, all developers of sludge incineration projects always burn as much sludge as possible i.e. 100% of the on-site production of sludge (say mixed sludge composed of primary sludge mixed with biological sludge i.e. “bad sludge” mixed with “good sludge”) and more sludge imported from other WWTPs (mixed sludge).
[0076] On the contrary, the invention is focused on burning only the “bad sludge” (primary sludge), which reduces the size of the incineration workshop, the sizes of flue gas treatment and equipment, reduces CAPEX investment and eases permitting for the client (smaller capacity, easier permitting). Burning only primary sludge means 50% reduction in the quantity of sludge to be treated.
[0077] In other words, the invention performs a differential and selective treatment of sludge. The primary sludge is the bad sludge containing unwanted parts like heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, etc. This bad sludge is easy to separate and this separation enables to obtain biological sludge from the good sludge (issued from the remaining wastewater).
[0078] The first part 13 of micro-contaminants is usually greater than the second part 23 of micro-contaminant. Typical, and in a non-limitative example, the first part 13 of micro-contaminants is about 60 wt. % of the micro-contaminants of the wastewater 10 and the second part 23 of micro-contaminants is about 40 wt. % of the micro-contaminants of the wastewater 10.
[0079]
[0080] In the block diagram represented in
[0081] Advantageously, the method for selectively removing micro-contaminants from sludge according to the invention further comprises a step of providing the heat 31 produced during the incineration of the primary sludge 12 (step d) to the thermal conditioning step. The invention segregates the two types of sludge (primary sludge and biological sludge) and processes each type of sludge through a dedicated combination of processes. Following this, the invention allows the production of greener biosolids with lower micro-contaminants content for soils uses from biological sludge. Coupling this separated sludge treatment processes with the heat transfer from the incineration to the thermal conditioning has the advantage of a lower overall energy footprint thanks to the thermal conditioning fed with heat 31 recovered from incineration. Providing the heat 31 produced during the incineration of the primary sludge 12 to the thermal conditioning step enables to perform a selective removal of micro-contaminants from sludge combined with energy efficiency and biogas reuse from sludge.
[0082] The method according to the invention may comprise an optional step m) of oxidation treatment on the biological sludge 24 before thickening. This optional step enables to further decrease the concentration of micro-contaminants into the sludge that is intended to be part of a solid product to be spread.
[0083] The method according to the invention may comprise an optional step f1) of anaerobic digestion of the biological sludge 24, said anaerobic digestion being performed upstream or downstream the thermal conditioning, thereby producing methane 32 and a solid product 33.
[0084] The method according to the invention may further comprise a step f2) of recovering nutrients 34 from the digested sludge after the step of anaerobic digestion. These steps are more detailed below based on
[0085] As depicted in
[0086] In the block diagram represented in
[0087] The step of Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) contributes to the destruction of micro-pollutants such as hydrophobic organic compounds pharmaceutical or endocrine disrupters for example.
[0088] Alternatively or in a parallel and complementary way, the thermal conditioning step may comprise a step i) of Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) thereby producing hydrolyzed sludge 43 followed by the anaerobic digestion being a step g) of anaerobic digestion of the hydrolyzed sludge 43, thereby producing a digestate 44 and a gaseous fraction 45 containing methane 32. In other words, in this embodiment, the thermal conditioning step is a Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) (step i), thereby producing hydrolyzed sludge 43, and the anaerobic digestion is performed downstream the THP, the anaerobic digestion being a anaerobic digestion (step g) of the hydrolyzed sludge 43, thereby producing a digestate 44 and a gaseous fraction 45 containing methane 32.
[0089] The step f) of nutrients 34 recovery from the digested sludge 41, 44 takes place after the step of anaerobic digestion.
[0090]
[0091] The method of the invention may comprise a step l) of stripping the second part 23 of micro-pollutant during the secondary treatment step c).
[0092] Stripping corresponds to the entrainment of gases or volatile products dissolved in water by the action of another gas, thereby carrying out a desorption. Typically stripping is adapted to sulfur and nitrogen products and some volatile organic materials (solvents, phenols, alcohols, etc.). In practice, stripping is carried out in contact towers where the water to be treated is spread in a counter-current of an extracting gas. The extracting gas may be air, but also steam or smoke gases. This step l) of stripping enables to extract the second part 23 of micro-pollutant to ensure a micro-pollutant free biological sludge 24. The step l) of stripping the second part 23 of micro-pollutant during the secondary treatment step c) is optional.
[0093]
[0094]
[0095] Finally the installation 70 comprises an incineration workshop 91 having a first inlet 92, a first outlet 93, and a second outlet 94. The first inlet 92 is in fluid connection with the first outlet 73 of the first tank 71. The incineration workshop 91 is configured to be fed at the first inlet 92 with the first stream 11 of primary sludge 12 and to eliminate the primary sludge and the first part 13 of micro-contaminants and to produce ashes 30 recovered at the first outlet 93 and heat 31 recovered at the second outlet 94. The incineration workshop 91 is suitable to perform any kind of combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, etc.
[0096] The incineration workshop 91 advantageously comprises any internal energy recovery system to minimize or eliminate fuel consumption required for the proper combustion of the primary sludge.
[0097] In another embodiment, the installation 70 may further comprise a thermal conditioner 60, 90 configured to be fed, directly or indirectly, with the biological sludge 24, as explained further below.
[0098] In an embodiment, the thermal conditioner 60 has a first inlet 61, a second inlet 62, and a first outlet 63. The first inlet 61 is in fluid connection with the first outlet 83 of the biological tank 81. The thermal conditioner 60 is configured to be fed at the first inlet 61 with biological sludge 24. The thermal conditioner 60 is suitable at least for a Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP).
[0099] In another embodiment, the thermal conditioner 90 has a first inlet 91, a second inlet 92, and a first outlet 93. The thermal conditioner 90 is suitable at least for a Hydro Thermal Carbonization (HTC) or a Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP). Preferably, the thermal conditioner 90 is suitable for Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC). These two embodiments comprising a thermal conditioner are described below.
[0100] In another embodiment of the installation 70, the second outlet 94 of the incineration workshop 91 may be in fluid connection with the second inlet 62, 92 of the thermal conditioner 60, 90. The thermal conditioner 60, 90 is then further configured to be fed at the second inlet 62, 92 with the heat 31 recovered at the second outlet 94 of the incineration workshop 91. The fluid connection of the second inlet of the thermal conditioner with the second outlet of the incineration workshop enables to conduct the heat 31 produced in the incineration workshop during the incineration of the primary sludge 12 to the thermal conditioning. This leads to a selective removal of micro-contaminants from sludge combined with energy efficiency and biogas reuse from sludge.
[0101] As mentioned before, in an embodiment of the installation 70, the thermal conditioner 60 is a THP (Thermal Hydrolysis Process) reactor configured to produce hydrolyzed sludge 43 recovered at the outlet 63. The outlet 63 is in fluid connection with the inlet of the anaerobic tank downstream the THP reactor. The anaerobic tank is suitable for anaerobic digestion of the hydrolyzed sludge 43, thereby producing a digestate 44 and a gaseous fraction 45 containing methane 32. In this embodiment, the anaerobic digestion is performed downstream the THP conditioner 60, and the anaerobic digestion is an anaerobic digestion of the hydrolyzed sludge 43. Following this, a digestate 44 and a gaseous fraction 45 containing methane 32 are produced. In another embodiment of the installation 70, the thermal conditioner 90 is downstream an anaerobic tank suitable for anaerobic digestion leading to a digestate 41 and a gaseous fraction 42 containing methane 32. The outlet of the thermal conditioner 90 is in fluid connection with the inlet 91 of the thermal conditioner 90 being a HTC (Hydro Thermal Carbonization) reactor. The HTC reactor 90 is configured to be fed with the digestate 41 at the first inlet 91 and to produce hydrolyzed sludge 43 recovered at the outlet 93. In this embodiment, the anaerobic digestion is an anaerobic digestion leading to a digestate 41 and a gaseous fraction 42 containing methane 32. The thermal conditioner 90 is positioned downstream the anaerobic tank. Preferably, the thermal conditioner 90 is a Hydro Thermal Carbonization (HTC) reactor. Following this, a solid product 33 is produced.
[0102] In another embodiment of the invention, the installation may comprise an anaerobic digester 75 configured to be fed at its inlet 76 with the first stream 11 of primary sludge 12 upstream the incineration workshop 91. The digestate recovered at the outlet 77 of the digester 75 is fed to the first inlet 92 of the incineration workshop 91.
[0103] As mentioned before, the installation 70 may further comprise a recirculation loop configured to recirculate the liquid fractions produced within the installation (in particular the liquid fraction 51 produced by the anaerobic digestion). This liquid fraction may be returned directly to the wastewater treatment plant inlet. It may be returned to inlet works (together with wastewater 10) or may undergo before returning to plant inlet an oxidation treatment (advanced oxidation process: AOP) (step o) in order to remove dissolved organics micro-pollutants and to avoid concentrating micro-pollutants. It means that these centrates (under the form of biosolids/sludge) produced during the anaerobic digestion, with or without thermal conditioning (HTC or THP), can be directly returned to the plant inlet or undergo a specific treatment such as oxidation before returning to the wastewater treatment plant inlet.
[0104] The installation 70 may further comprise a device for recovering nutrients 34 from the digested sludge downstream the anaerobic tank.
[0105] The main principle of the invention relies on the sludge separation in the primary treatment step leading to a primary sludge and a remaining wastewater (further leading to biological sludge after the secondary treatment) and the incineration of the primary sludge. The main part of micro-pollutant is contained in the primary sludge. Therefore, the coupling of the sludge separation and the incineration of the primary sludge enables the destruction of micro-contaminants in the sludge. The invention consists in capturing, diverting and destroying a large part of micro-contaminants, at least about 60 wt. % of the wastewater.
[0106] The further use of excess heat from the incineration to the thermal conditioning enables to recover energy. In other words, the energy from the incineration is valued to boost the biogas production and biomethane exportation. Furthermore, the invention allows producing greener biosolids (i.e. having less than 20% micro-contaminants in content) for use in agriculture.
[0107] The benefits resulting from the invention are: [0108] Removal of the greatest portion of micro-contaminants from the water cycle through primary sludge coupled with sludge incineration (60%); [0109] Smaller incineration workshop i.e. less CAPEX intensive solution, which will ease the development of sludge incineration: burning only 50% of sludge (primary sludge=“bad sludge”) compared to existing state-of-the-art treatment lines that burn 100% or 0% of the sludge through incineration in conventional treatment lines; [0110] Increased net biogas production thanks to the recovery of heat from the incineration; [0111] Production of greener biosolids from the thermal conditioning by means of diversion of micro-contaminants to the sludge incineration workshop.
[0112] Moreover, the secondary treatment of the remaining wastewater together with the anaerobic digestion of the biological sludge 24 performed upstream or downstream the thermal conditioning has additional advantages. It contributes to the production of greener biosolids from biological sludge only, that is to say not mixed with the primary sludge that is contaminated with micro-contaminants. This leads to the production of greener Class A biosolids for use in agriculture, silviculture, soil refurbishment, landscaping, households . . . . And as mentioned before, there is a boost energy recovery through biogas production and biomethane exportation from the thermal conditioning, thanks to the combination of the HTC process (low energy process) or HTP process with anaerobic digestion and incineration.
[0113] In order to illustrate the advantages of the method of the invention, material and energy balances of the method of the invention (entitled “invention” sector) and other sludge treatment sectors (incineration alone, digestion alone, digestion+incineration) were performed. The results are below:
TABLE-US-00001 Lower calorific Value (LCV) Sludge dry matter 51.52 Digestion + Invention Incineration Digestion incineration Biogaz energy 22.18 0 15.67 21.64 High temperature 0.74 19.72 0 6.11 energy Low temperature 0.29 0 0 0 energy Sludge LCV energy 11.81 0 14.38 0.00 Performance on Dry 68% 38% 58% 54% matter LCV
[0114] We can notice that the method according to the invention is the best method in terms of performance on LCV.
[0115] When adding to each energy an (arbitrary) coefficient to take into account the “interest” of each energy produced, the comparison becomes:
TABLE-US-00002 ENERGETIC Digestion + COEF Invention incineration digestion incineration 1 22.18 0.00 15.67 21.64 0.3 0.22 5.92 0.00 1.83 0.1 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.3 3.54 0.00 4.32 0.00 25.97 5.92 19.99 23.48 100% 23% 77% 90%
[0116] The same conclusion remains, even if the gap is reduced with the incineration digestion sector.
[0117] If we look in terms of “sizing of equipment”:
TABLE-US-00003 Digestion + Invention Incineration Digestion incineration Sizing digester 1 0 1.9 1.9 Sizing incineration 1 3.1 0 1.6 workshop Sizing HTC 1 0 0 0
[0118] The method of the invention therefore makes it possible to greatly reduce both the size of an incinerator (by nature very expensive) and the size of the digester.
[0119] On the other hand it is necessary to add equipment (a little expensive) compared to the incineration digestion sector. And of course it is more expensive than a digestion alone.
[0120] The orders of quantities for the same quantity to be processed in terms of price are: [0121] Incineration workshop: 1 [0122] Digester: 0.6 [0123] HTC: 0.4
[0124] Of course it is necessarily dependent-site but it shows that the incineration workshop should be reduced at all costs. The HTC is not very expensive. So in terms of selling price to treat micro-contaminants, the method of the invention emerges cheaper than the other sectors.
TABLE-US-00004 Digestion + Invention Incineration Digestion incineration Micro-pollutant + ++ − ++ destruction valorization for + − ++ − agricultural purposes DIVERT ++ − + 0 RECYCLE RECOVER