Cosmetic composition for blocking fine dust

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a cosmetic composition for blocking fine dust. The composition according to the present disclosure can fundamentally prevent problems due to fine dust by reducing the attachment rate of fine dust attached to skin.

Claims

1. A method for lowering attachment of fine dusts to skin by applying an effective amount of a compound containing an N-heterocycle into skin of a person in need thereof, wherein the compound containing an N-heterocycle is one or more selected from the group consisting of bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine, melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine), methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol, ethylhexyl triazone, phenyl benzimidazole sulfonic acid, diethylhexyl butamido triazone, disodium phenyl dibenzimidazole tetrasulfonate, drometrizole trisiloxane, and trisbiphenyl triazine, wherein an attachment rate of fine dusts attached to skin is reduced to 85% or less compared to a control group that does not use the effective amount of said N-heterocycle.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the compound containing an N-heterocycle is comprised in a cosmetic composition as a fine dust blocking agent, and the compound comprising an N-heterocycle is applied into skin by applying the cosmetic composition into skin.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the fine dust blocking agent consists of the compound containing an N-heterocycle.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the compound containing an N-heterocycle is comprised in a water-dispersed form.

5. The method according to claim 2, wherein the cosmetic composition does not comprise an oil component.

6. The method according to claim 2, wherein the cosmetic composition is a hydration formulation.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the hydration formulation is a formulation selected from the group consisting of water gel, solution, foam, cosmetic water, milky lotion, suspension, emulsion, paste, lotion, patch, mist and spray formulations.

8. The method according to claim 2, wherein the compound containing an N-heterocycle is comprised in an amount of 0.1 to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the composition.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the attachment rate of fine dusts attached to skin is reduced to less than ½ compared to a control group that does not use the effective amount of said N-heterocycle.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the attachment rate of fine dusts attached to skin is reduced to less than ⅓ compared to a control group that does not use the effective amount of said N-heterocycle.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the attachment rate of fine dusts attached to skin is reduced to about ¼ compared to a control group that does not use the effective amount of said N-heterocycle.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the compound containing an N-heterocycle is comprised in an amount of 0.5 to 8% by weight based on the total weight of the composition.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the compound containing an N-heterocycle is comprised in an amount of 1 to 5% by weight based on the total weight of the composition.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(1) Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in detail by examples to specifically described the present disclosure. However, the examples according to the present disclosure may be modified into various other forms, and the scope of the present disclosure should not be construed to be limited by the examples described below. The examples of the present disclosure are provided to illustrate the present disclosure more completely.

Experimental Example 1: Preparation of Example 1 and Comparative Examples 1-3 and Estimation of Fine Dust Attachment

(2) The present inventors prepared essences having the composition of the following Table 1 by a common method, for an experiment of estimation of fine dust attachment.

(3) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 1 example 1 example 2 example 3 Content(% Content(% Content(% Content(% Raw material by weight) by weight) by weight) by weight) Purified water To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 Glycerin 3 3 3 3 Butylene glycol 6 6 6 6 1,2-hexanediol 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Stearic acid 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cetearyl 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 glucoside Cetearyl alcohol 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Methyl glucose 1 1 1 1 sesquistearate Glyceryl 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 stearate Phenyl 4 4 4 4 trimethicone Cyclo- 4 4 4 4 pentasiloxane Cyclo- 2 2 2 2 hexasiloxane Bis-ethylhexyl- 2.0 — — — oxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine.sup.(1) Arachidyl — 2.0 — — glucoside Isostearyl — — 2.0 — isostearate Flavoring 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .sup.(1)Tinosorb ® S, BASF

(4) 1) Method for Estimating Fine Dust Attachment

(5) i) After applying artificial sebum of 1.3 mg/cm.sup.2 on a PMMA plate, it was dried for 15 minutes.

(6) ii) After applying a test formulation on the dried artificial sebum in the same amount, it was dried for 15 minutes (Noting was applied on the control group).

(7) iii) The PMMA plate was attached on the internal top of the self-made chamber, and a pan on the bottom of the chamber was operated for 5 minutes, to expose 0.5 g substitutive fine dusts (brand name LM-YG0510, comprising strontium carbonate, alumina, europium oxide, and dysprosium oxide).

(8) iv) Using a magnifying glass (Aphrodite-3, 50×), UV images were photographed (measuring 4 points per plate).

(9) v) Using ImagePro Plus, the area of dust attachment was measured.

(10) vi) The fine dust attachment rate was calculated by comparing the sample with the result of 3 times of experiments (Setting the fine dust attachment rate of the control group to 100).

(11) 2) Result

(12) As a result, as shown in Table 2, it was confirmed that Example 1 showed the relative attachment rate of less than ⅓ compared to the control group, and it has an excellent effect of prevent fine dust attachment as much as showing the relative attachment rate of less than ½ compared to the Comparative examples 1-3.

(13) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Exam- Comparative Comparative Comparative Control ple 1 example 1 example 2 example 3 group Fine dust 28.97 88.31 89.85 63.90 100 attachment rate (%)

Experimental Example 2: Preparation of Example 2 and Comparative Examples 4-8 and Estimation of Fine Dust Attachment

(14) The present inventors prepared essences having the composition of the following Table 3 by a common method, for an experiment of estimation of fine dust attachment.

(15) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 2 example 4 example 5 example 6 example 7 example 8 Content(% Content(% Content(% Content(% Content(% Content(% Raw material by weight) by weight) by weight) by weight) by weight) by weight) Purified water To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 Glycerin 3 3 3 3 3 3 Butylene glycol 6 6 6 6 6 6 1,2-hexanediol 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Stearic acid 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cetearyl glucoside 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Cetearyl alcohol 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol 0.5 — — — — — methoxyphenyl triazine water dispersion.sup.(2) Amodimethicone — 0.5 — — — — Polyquaternium-10 — — 0.5 Polymethylmethacrylate — — — 0.5 — — Aminomethylpropanol — — — — 0.5 — Flavoring 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .sup.(2)Tinosorb ® S Aqua, BASF

(16) As a result, as shown in Table 4, it was confirmed that Example 2 showed the relative attachment rate of about ¼ compared to the control group, and it has an excellent effect of prevent fine dust attachment as much as showing the relative attachment rate of less than ⅓ compared to the Comparative examples 4-8.

(17) In addition, as the result of confirming the effect of preventing fine dust attachment of other compounds comprised in the bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine water dispersion (Tinosorb® S Aqua, BASF) of Example 2 through Comparative examples 6 and 7, it was confirmed that other compounds other than bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine had no effect of preventing fine dust attachment.

(18) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Com- Com- Com- Com- Com- Ex- par- par- par- par- par- am- ative ative ative ative ative ple exam- exam- exam- exam- exam- Control 2 ple 4 ple 5 ple 6 ple 7 ple 8 group Fine dust 25.21 89.66 91.10 92.52 80.77 77.68 100 attachment rate (%)

Experimental Example 3: Preparation of Example 3 and Comparative Example 9 and Estimation of Fine Dust Attachment

(19) The present inventors prepared water-gel formulations of Example 3 and Comparative example 9 by the content shown in the following Table 5, and progressed the estimation of fine dust attachment.

(20) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Comparative Example 3 example 9 Content(% Content(% Raw material INCI name by weight) by weight) Purified water To 100 To 100 Glycerin 4 4 PEG-5 2 2 1,2-hexanediol 1 1 Ammonium 0.4 0.4 acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP copolymer melamine 0.5 —

(21) As a result, as shown in Table 6, it was confirmed that Comparative example 9 had no effect of preventing fine dust attachment compared to the control group in which nothing was applied, and rather fine dust attached better, while Example 3 showed the relative attachment rate of less than 85% compared to the control group and that of less than ½ compared to the Comparative example 9, and thereby an excellent effect of preventing fine dust attachment of melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) characteristically contained in Example 3 was confirmed.

(22) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Comparative Control Example 3 example 9 group Fine dust attachment 82.1 178.5 100 rate (%)

Experimental Example 4: Preparation of Examples 4-6 and Comparative Examples 10-12 and Estimation of Fine Dust Attachment

(23) The present inventors prepared emulsion formulations of Examples 4-6 and Comparative examples 10-12 by the content shown in the following Table 7, and progressed the estimation of fine dust attachment.

(24) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Example Example Example Comparative Comparative Comparative 4 5 6 example example example Content Content Content 10 11 12 Raw material INCI (% by (% by (% by Content(% Content(% Content(% name weight) weight) weight) by weight) by weight) by weight) Hydrogenated 3 3 3 3 3 3 polydecene Cyclopentasiloxane 5 5 5 5 5 5 Cetearyl alcohol 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Ceteareth-6 Olivate 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Shea butter 3 3 3 3 3 3 Isostearate 1 1 1 1 1 1 Phenethylbenzoate 2 2 2 2 2 2 Purified water To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 Xanthan gum 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Acrylate/C10-30 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer Hydrogenated 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 lecithin Trisodium EDTA 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pantenol 1 1 1 1 1 1 Glycerin 5 5 5 5 5 5 Butylene glycol 3 3 3 3 3 3 1,2-hexanediol 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tromethamine 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Flavoring 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Methylene Bis- 4 — — — — — Benzotriazolyl tetramethyl butylphenol Ethylhexyl triazone — 2 — — — — Phenylbenzimidazole — — 2 — — — sulfonic acid Ethylhexylmethoxy — — — — 6 — Cinnamate Ethyl hexyl Salicylate — — — — — 4.5

(25) As a result, as shown in Table 8, it was confirmed that even Comparative examples 10-12 had a slight effect of preventing fine dust attachment compared to the control group in which nothing was applied, but Example 4, Example 5 and Example 6 showed the relative attachment rate of less than ⅓ compared to the control group, about ⅓ of the control group, and less than ½ compared to the control group, respectively, and thereby, an excellent effect of preventing fine dust attachment of Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl tetramethyl butylphenol, ethylhexyl triazone, and phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid characteristically contained in Examples 4, 5 and 6, respectively.

(26) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Ex- Ex- Ex- Com- Com- Com- am- am- am- parative parative parative ple ple ple example example example Control 4 5 6 10 11 12 group Fine dust 31.43 34.45 45.21 87.23 79.63 85.21 100 attachment rate (%)

(27) Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl tetramethyl butylphenol having benzotriazole, ethylhexyl triazone having triazine, and phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid having benzimidazole, which are N-heterocyclic structures, showed an excellent effect of reducing fine dust attachment compared to other compounds.

Experimental Example 5: Preparation of Examples 7-10 and Comparative Examples 13-15 and Estimation of Fine Dust Attachment

(28) The present inventors prepared cream formulations of Examples 7-10 and Comparative examples 13-15 by the content shown in the following Table 9, and progressed the estimation of fine dust attachment.

(29) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Example Example Example Example Comparative Comparative Comparative 7 8 9 10 example example example Content Content Content Content 13 14 15 Raw material (% by (% by (% by (% by Content(% Content(% Content(% INCI name weight) weight) weight) weight) by weight) by weight) by weight) Cetearyl 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 alcohol Beeswax 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Glyceryl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 stearate PEG-100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 stearate Sucrose 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 polystearate Triethylhexanoin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dimethicone 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Caprylyl 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 trimethicone Purified water To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 To 100 Acrylate/C10- 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer Xanthan gum 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Carbomer 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Propandiol 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Glycerin 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Butylene glycol 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 1,2-hexandiol 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tromethamine 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Flavoring 0.1 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Diethylhexyl 3 — — — — — — butamido triazone Disodium — 3 — — — — — phenyl dibenzimidazole tetrasulfonate Drometrizole — — 3 — — — trisiloxane Trisbiphenyl — — — 3 — — — triazine Ethylhexylmethoxy — — — — — 6 — cinnamate Ethylhexyl — — — — — — 4.5 salicylate

(30) As a result, as shown in Table 10, it was confirmed that even Comparative examples 13-15 had few effect of preventing fine dust attachment compared to the control group in which nothing was applied, but Examples 7-10 showed the relative attachment rate of less than ½ compared to the control group, respectively, and thereby, an excellent effect of preventing fine dust attachment of Diethylhexyl butamido triazone, disodium phenyl dibenzimidazole tetrasulfonate, and trisbiphenyl triazine characteristically contained in Examples 7-10, respectively.

(31) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Com- Com- Com- par- par- Ex- Ex- Ex- Ex- par- ative ative am- am- am- am- ative exam- exam- ple ple ple ple example ple ple Control 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 group Fine dust 42.55 39.69 45.81 40.07 98.12 91.45 88.87 100 attachment rate (%)

(32) Diethylhexyl butamido triazone having triazine, disodium phenyl dibenzimidazole tetrasulfonate having benzimidazole, and trisbiphenyl triazine having benzotriazole, which are N-heterocyclic structures, showed an excellent effect of reducing fine dust attachment compared to other compounds.