B.SUB.0 .shimming device for MRI
11733329 · 2023-08-22
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01R33/543
PHYSICS
G01R33/3804
PHYSICS
International classification
G01R33/38
PHYSICS
Abstract
A magnetic resonance (MR) apparatus comprises magnet means for generating a main magnetic field in a sample region, encoding means for generating encoding magnetic fields superimposed to the main magnetic field, RF transmitter means for generating MR radiofrequency fields, driver means for operating said encoding means and RF transmitter means to generate superimposed time dependent encoding fields and radiofrequency fields according to an MR sequence for forming images or spectra; and acquisition means for acquiring an MR signal from said object. The magnet means comprise a primary magnetic field source providing a static magnetic field B.sub.0 and at least one secondary magnetic field source providing an adjustable magnetic field B′. To provide improved shimming, the secondary magnetic field source comprises at least two spatially distinct portions of a first magnetic material and of a second magnetic material, respectively, said first magnetic material having a first magnetic moment density m1 and said second magnetic material having a second magnetic moment density m2, and means for independently adjusting said second magnetic moment density m2 by variation of an external control parameter.
Claims
1. A magnetic resonance (MR) apparatus comprising: a) magnet for generating a main magnetic field in a sample region adapted for introduction of a sample or subject from which a MR signal is to be acquired; b) wherein the apparatus is configured to superimpose encoding magnetic fields onto the main magnetic field; c) RF transmitter configured to generate MR radiofrequency fields; d) driver configured to operate said RF transmitter which is configured to generate radiofrequency fields according to a MR sequence for forming images or spectra and wherein superimposed time dependent encoding fields are generated as a result of operating the driver; and e) wherein said magnet comprises a primary magnetic field source providing a static magnetic field B.sub.0 and at least one secondary magnetic field source providing an adjustable magnetic field B′; wherein said secondary magnetic field source comprises at least two spatially distinct portions of a first magnetic material and of a second magnetic material, respectively, said first magnetic material having a first magnetic moment density m1 and said second magnetic material having a second magnetic moment density m2, and means for independently adjusting said second magnetic moment density m2 by variation of an external control parameter, the apparatus further comprising at least three magnetic field probes configured to allow determination of an instant spatial distribution of the static magnetic field resulting from said static magnetic field B.sub.0 and said adjustable magnetic field B′.
2. The MR apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said second magnetic moment density m2 is adjustable in a range extending from values that are smaller than the first magnetic moment density m1 to values that are larger than the first magnetic moment density m1.
3. The MR apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said external control parameter is selected from the group consisting of temperature, pressure, shear and light illumination prevailing at the secondary magnetic field source and electric current flowing therethrough.
4. The MR apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said external control parameter is the local temperature of said portion of second magnetic material, and wherein said adjusting means are configured to adjust said local temperature in a control temperature range extending from a lowest control temperature T.sub.L to a highest control temperature T.sub.H, and wherein said second magnetic material has a Curie temperature T.sub.C lying within said control temperature range.
5. The MR apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said Curie temperature T.sub.C is in the range from 300K to 450K.
6. The MR apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said secondary magnetic field source is formed as an elongated body having a longitudinal axis, and wherein a plurality of spatially distinct portions of said second magnetic material are arranged at distinct positions along said longitudinal axis.
7. The MR apparatus according to claim 6, comprising a plurality of secondary magnetic field sources arranged circumferentially around the sample region.
8. The MR apparatus according to claim 1, wherein each secondary magnetic field source comprises means for determining an instant value of the external control parameter.
9. The MR apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said second magnetic material is formed of an alloy containing Fe, Ni, Ga, Mn, Gd, Sm, Nd, Dy, Eu or Co.
10. The MR apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the adjustable magnetic field B′ of each secondary magnetic field source in an axial direction z of the static magnetic field B.sub.0 can be switched between positive and negative values as a function of the external control parameter.
11. A method of operating a MR apparatus including a sample region adapted for introduction of a sample or subject, the method comprising: a) providing a static magnetic field B.sub.0 via a primary magnetic field source and at least one adjustable magnetic field B′ via at least one secondary magnetic field source and generating, via said static magnetic field B.sub.0 and said adjustable magnetic field B′, a main magnetic field; b) generating superimposed time dependent encoding fields and MR radiofrequency fields according to an MR sequence for forming images or spectra; and c) acquiring an MR signal from said sample or subject; wherein said secondary magnetic field source in a) comprises at least two spatially distinct portions of a first magnetic material and of a second magnetic material, respectively, said first magnetic material having a first magnetic moment density m1 and said second magnetic material having a second magnetic moment density m2, wherein said second magnetic moment density m2 is independently adjustable by variation of an external control parameter, and determining an instant spatial distribution of the static magnetic field resulting from said B.sub.0 and said B′ via a plurality of at least three magnetic field probes wherein, after said sample or subject has been introduced into the sample region, said external control parameter is adjusted to obtain a predetermined main magnetic field B resulting from the superposition of the static magnetic field B.sub.0 and the adjustable magnetic field B′ of each secondary magnetic field source, wherein the adjustment is carried out at a beginning of a MR sequence for forming images or spectra.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said second magnetic moment density m2 is adjusted via the external control parameter between values of m2<m1 and values of m2>m1.
13. The MR apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said secondary magnetic field source is formed as an elongated body having a longitudinal axis, and wherein a plurality of spatially distinct portions of said second magnetic material are arranged at distinct positions along said longitudinal axis.
14. The MR apparatus according to claim 13, wherein said external control parameter is the local temperature of said portion of second magnetic material, and wherein said adjusting means are configured to adjust said local temperature in a control temperature range extending from a lowest control temperature T.sub.L to a highest control temperature T.sub.H, and wherein said second magnetic material has a Curie temperature T.sub.C lying within said control temperature range.
15. The MR apparatus according to claim 13, wherein said Curie temperature T.sub.C is in the range from 300K to 450K.
16. The MR apparatus according to claim 13, comprising a plurality of secondary magnetic field sources arranged circumferentially around the sample region.
17. A magnetic resonance (MR) apparatus with a sample region adapted for introduction of a sample or subject from which a MR signal is to be acquired comprising: a) a primary magnetic field source providing a static magnetic field B.sub.0 and at least one secondary magnetic field source providing an adjustable magnetic field B′ configured to generate a main magnetic field in the sample region, wherein said secondary magnetic field source comprises at least two spatially distinct portions of a first magnetic material and of a second magnetic material, respectively, said first magnetic material having a first magnetic moment density m1 and said second magnetic material having a second magnetic moment density m2, wherein said second magnetic moment density m2 is configured to be independently adjustable by variation of an external control parameter; b) wherein the apparatus is configured to superimpose encoding magnetic fields onto the main magnetic field, c) RF transmitter configured to generate MR RF fields, wherein the RF coil and the RF transmitter are operationally connected to: a driver configured to operate the RF coil and the RF transmitter and which are configured to generate superimposed time dependent encoding fields and RF fields according to an MR sequence configured to form images or spectra; and at least three magnetic field probes configured to determine an instant spatial distribution of the static magnetic field resulting from said static magnetic field B.sub.0 and said adjustable magnetic field B′.
18. The MR apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said secondary magnetic field source is formed as an elongated body having a longitudinal axis, and wherein a plurality of spatially distinct portions of said second magnetic material are arranged at distinct positions along said longitudinal axis.
19. The MR apparatus according to claim 18, comprising a plurality of secondary magnetic field sources arranged circumferentially around the sample region.
20. The MR apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said second magnetic material is formed of an alloy containing Fe, Ni, Ga, Mn, Gd, Sm, Nd, Dy, Eu or Co.
21. The method according to claim 11, wherein the adjustable magnetic field B′ of each secondary magnetic field source in an axial direction z of the static magnetic field B.sub.0 can be switched between positive and negative values as a function of the external control parameter.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The above mentioned and other features and objects of this invention and the manner of achieving them will become more apparent and this invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of this invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein are shown:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(9) In the following we will use temperature T as a representative example of an external control parameter that influences the magnetic moment density of a material of interest. As explained earlier, there are other quantities that could be used as control parameter instead of temperature, so the following examples shall not be construed as a limitation to the use of temperature as the control parameter.
(10) The basic principle of an adjustable secondary magnetic field source is illustrated in
(11)
(12) If the second material exhibits ferromagnetic behavior, the high magnetic moment situation shown in
(13) From a comparison of
(14) A more complex situation is shown schematically in
(15) An exemplary arrangement of an MRI apparatus including a plurality of adjustable magnetic field elements acting as secondary magnetic field sources for providing an adjustable magnetic field B′ is shown in
Example 1
Magnetic Pebbles—Materials with Controllable Magnetism for Compact, Low-Power Shim Units
(16) Introduction
(17) Susceptibility induced off-resonances challenge many cutting-edge applications using single shot read-outs, balanced acquisitions or high-resolution spectroscopy, in particular at ultra-high fields. B.sub.0 shimming with increased number of channels yields critical improvements [8], but significantly reduces free bore diameter. Coil conductors in close proximity to the subject [9] or even on the RF coils [4] reduce space and power requirements. However, unwanted interactions with RF and gradient operation was reported as a main issue and the handling is aggravated by the amount of conductors in the unit and the large number of high-current wires routed through the bore. Furthermore highly stabilized current supplies need to be fitted in the technical room.
(18) As an alternative we present the integration of ferromagnetic materials whose magnetization can be accurately controlled in-situ as opposed to traditional passive shims [1]. Thereby the secondary field produced by this material is used to shim highly localized. The proposed geometric arrangement allows producing fields with both polarities.
(19) Methods
(20) The magnetic moment density (m) of a ferromagnetic particle in a strong external magnetic field can be controlled by its temperature ([10],
(21) For obtaining a reasonable temperature range, Nickel and Copper were alloyed to shots in a Ni75Cu25 stoichiometry [7] resulting in a T.sub.C of 350° K (
(22) To produce fields of both polarities using materials with only positive susceptibilities, the magnetic material is arranged in a matrix such that its net secondary field is uniform when the magnetization of the heated particles is roughly halved (e.g.
(23) The secondary field of the shim unit was measured by B.sub.0 mapping (Philips 3T Achieva, Best Netherlands) with 3 ms echo-spacing in a phantom bottle placed directly on top of the unit. 3 magnetic field probes (Skope MRT, Zurich, Switzerland) were each placed about 1 cm from each unit and 2 on top of the bottle.
(24) Results
(25)
(26) Discussion
(27) Particles with controllable magnetism produce shim-field patterns with high spatial degrees of freedom. Since the source of the field is not an electric current but the magnetism of the material, smaller form factors and lower current consumptions are achieved and the particles are well decoupled from gradient and shim as well as from RF coils. Opposed to passive shims, rearranging the material is not required to fit subject specific susceptibility distributions.
(28) The heat required to control the units can be administered by DC and AC currents as well as optically tunable materials can be employed [11]. Furthermore the power delivery for the heating can be efficiently modulated by switched mode schemes such as by PWM current sources similarly as used for LED lightings where tens of channels can be housed in a single IC package. This allows placing the required electronics in the bore which dramatically reduces the involved cabling efforts.
(29) Very large numbers of independent shim channels can be integrated in RF coils with low additional weight and space requirements. Thereby high degrees of freedom can be obtained therefore the approach is expected to be well suited for shimming of susceptibility induced off-resonances i.e. in the prefrontal cortex, ear channels or the spine.
Example 2
Adaptive Shimming Procedure
(30) Preparations
(31) The dependence and spatial pattern of the fields induced by the individual shim units in the volume of interest in the subject have to be known in advance. There are various methods for obtaining this information. Typically this information will be gathered during the design or installation/maintenance procedure of the device.
(32) The field patterns can be either obtained by magnetostatic field simulations/calculations using the knowledge of the geometrical distribution of the employed materials and its magnetic properties. Alternatively, the fields can be measured using a field camera, a scanning magnetic field probe or an MRI based tomographic procedure (B0 mapping sequence, [12, 13]) performed on a phantom or in-vivo/in-situ. For isolating the fields induced by the shimming units from the field induced by other structures and magnets, the field can be measured with different control parameter values or with and without shimming unit present and the measurements can subsequently be compared.
(33) Similarly, the dependence of the induced shimming field on the control parameter can be directly measured in an MRI scanner using one of the method mentioned above. Thereby it might be sufficient in many cases to acquire a calibration curve for the employed material and using this information together with the spatial distribution of the material to calculate an estimate of the induced fields.
(34) Furthermore, in most cases the spatial distribution of the induced fields is linearly dependent on the magnetic moment of the employed material at the given control variable. Therefore the acquisition/estimate of the field distribution can be separated from the estimation of the magnetic moment of the material. Consequently, only few field maps covering the entire volume are required.
(35) Finally, since the induced correction fields are in most cases very small compared to the background fields, the individual shim units will only interact very weakly. Consequently, the induced total fields of an array of such shim units will be linearly dependent on the induced field of each unit alone. This linear relation significantly simplifies the calibration procedure in that each unit can be measured separately and accounted according to its geometric position relative to the volume of interest. Furthermore, the calculation of the induced total field is greatly simplified too, which makes the subsequently described optimization procedures much simpler.
(36) Procedure
(37) Before starting the intended MR signal acquisition, the B0 field in the volume of interest is measured in-situ. I.e. the subject/sample is positioned in the scanner as suitable for the subsequent scanning procedure. Well known measurement procedures for active shimming can be employed [13-16] by which the field is obtained on full grid or on projections to appropriate basis functions.
(38) If the shimming units are mounted on movable parts such as a local RF coil or the patient support, the position of the shim units or at least the entire array has to be determined. This can be achieved either by optical markers for positioning or referencing to light visors, direct mechanical or optical measurements or by acquiring and evaluating the signal from NMR active fiducial markers or field probes during positioning scans.
(39) Using the knowledge of the field induced by each shim unit in the sample, the control value for each shim unit can be calculated such that the field distribution in the volume of interest will approximate the given target distribution (typically a uniform field) best. For this purpose, well-known optimization techniques can be employed. In most cases it will be beneficial to employ constrained optimization algorithms incorporating the maximum fields that can be induced by each shimming unit.
(40) The calculated control values are then applied to the shim units.
(41) The procedure described above can then be iterated in order to optimize the accuracy of the field correction. In other words, once the calculated control values have been applied to the shim units, one can repeat the in situ measurement of B0 in the volume of interest and if the deviation from the target distribution is larger than a pre-defined threshold, one can calculate and apply a refined set of control values.
(42) Once the B0 field in the volume of interest is deemed acceptable, one can proceed to carry out the intended MRI signal acquisition.
REFERENCES
(43) [1] D. I. Hoult and D. Lee, Shimming a superconducting nuclear-magnetic-resonance imaging magnet with steel. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56 (1985) 131-136 [2] A. Bungert, C. D. Chambers, M. Phillips, and J. Evans, Reducing image artefacts in concurrent TMS/fMRI by passive shimming. Neurolmage 59 (2012) 2167-2174 [3] C. Juchem, P. Herman, B. G. Sanganahalli, P. B. Brown, S. McIntyre, T. W. Nixon, D. Green, F. Hyder, and R. A. de Graaf, Dynamic Multi-Coil Technique (DYNAMITE) Shimming of the Rat Brain at 11.7 Tesla. NMR in Biomedicine 27(8) (2014) 897-906 [4] J. P. Stockmann, T. Witzel, B. Keil, J. R. Polimeni, A. Mareyam, C. LaPierre, K. Setsompop, and L. L. Wald, A 32-channel combined RF and B0 shim array for 3T brain imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 75 (2015) 441-451 [5] E. Sasioglu, L. M. Sandratskii, and P. Bruno, Pressure dependence of the Curie temperature in Ni2MnSn Heusler alloy: A first-principles study. Physical Review B, 71 (2005) 214412-1-214412-7 [6] Munekata H, Photoinduced Magnetism in Semiconductor-Based Structures, J Supercond 14 (2001) 205-210 [7] S. A. Ahern, M. J. C. Martin, and F. R. S. Sucksmith, The spontaneous magnetization of nickel+copper alloys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 248 (1958) 145-152 [8] Pan J W et al. Role of very high order and degree B0 shimming for spectroscopic imaging of the human brain at 7 tesla., Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 68(4) (2012) [9] Juchem C et al. Dynamic multi-coil technique (DYNAMITE) shimming for echoplanar imaging of the human brain at 7 Tesla, Neuroimage 105 (2015) 462-472 [10] Kittel C., Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th Ed. Wiley (2004) [11] Munekata H, Photoinduced Magnetism in Semiconductor-Based Structures, J Supercond 14 (2001) 205-210 [12] J. Frahm, K.-D. Merboldt, and W. Hänicke, Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation. Magn Reson Med, 1988. 6(4): p. 474-480 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910060412 [13] K. Scheffler, Fast frequency mapping with balanced SSFP: Theory and application to proton-resonance frequency shift thermometry. Magn Reson Med, 2004. 51(6): p. 1205-1211 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20081 [14] R. Gruetter and C. Boesch, Fast, noniterative shimming of spatially localized signals—Invivo analysis of the magnetic field along axes. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 1992. 96(2): p. 323-334 DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(92)90085-I [15] J. Tropp, K. A. Derby, C. Hawryszko, S. Sugiura, and H. Yamagata, Automated shimming of B0 for spectroscopic imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 1989. 85(2): p. 244-254 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(89)90140-6 [16] P. C. M. Vanzijl, S. Sukumar, M. O. Johnson, P. Webb, and R. E. Hurd, Optimized Shimming for High-Resolution NMR Using Three-Dimensional Image-Based Field Mapping. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A, 1994. 111(2): p. 203-207 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1994.1248