Magnetic decorative lighting
11333309 · 2022-05-17
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F21V31/03
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F21V21/096
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F21S4/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F21W2121/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A stringed holiday lighting ornament contains both drain holes at its base to alleviate moisture build-up, and protruding magnets for secure attachment to ferromagnetic surfaces, whereby such protrusion permits the drain holes to be exposed to the air and thus flow and/or evaporate away accumulated moisture.
Claims
1. A decorative lighting system comprising: a light bulb socket comprising a base portion the base portion comprising at least one drain hole communicating with an inside of the light bulb socket, and at least two pockets suitable for receiving a magnet; and at least two magnets secured into the each of the at least two pockets, wherein the at least two magnets protrude from the base portion.
2. The decorative lighting system of claim 1 wherein the at least two pockets is exactly two pockets.
3. The decorative lighting system of claim 1 wherein a separation between the magnets in the at least two pockets forms a channel.
4. The decorative lighting system of claim 3 wherein the channel has two ends, and the at least one drain hole comprises two drain holes, one on each of the two ends.
5. The decorative lighting system of claim 1 wherein each different magnet is shaped as a half circle.
6. The decorative lighting system of claim 1 wherein each different magnet has a maximum pull strength of less than 5 lbs.
7. The decorative lighting system of claim 1 wherein each different magnet has a maximum pull strength of less than 4 lbs.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(5) The moisture-mitigating design of the preferred embodiment is shown in
(6)
(7) For a disc-shaped N40 magnet with 12 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness (unlike the semicircle arrangement described here), the theoretical maximum pull strength, according to the Magnetic Calculator at kjmagnetics.com, is 6.90 lbs for the case of a magnet touching a steel plate (zero distance away). (Many web-based calculators are available for determining essentially the same value, with minor deviations in calculated strengths). For a disc shaped N45 magnet, this theoretical maximum is 7.76 lbs. It is evident that each half circle magnet as configured in the invention has half of those theoretical maximum pull strengths: 3.45 lbs or 3.88 lbs, respectively. In actual use, pull strength will be affected by conditions in the field. For example layers of paint on steel would create a distance between magnet and metal, diminishing actual pull strength. In the embodiment with two magnets as described, each magnet preferably has a maximum pull strength of less than 5 lbs, and more preferably less than 4 lbs.
(8)
(9)
(10) To those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains, the above-described preferred embodiments may be subject to change or modification. Such change or modification can be carried out without departing from the scope of the invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.