Method for quickly and accurately analyzing polyphenol content in rapeseed oil

Abstract

The disclosure discloses a method for quickly and accurately analyzing polyphenol content in rapeseed oil, and belongs to the field of analysis of natural compounds. The separation method of the disclosure uses acetonitrile-water as an extractant to extract polyphenols from the rapeseed oil, and cooperates with a C.sub.18 adsorbent for purification, and then performs separation and purification. Compared with the traditional liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction, the method has an average recovery rate of polyphenols in the rapeseed oil of 81.31% to 102.95%, and RSDs of 0.86% to 8.03%, and has higher accuracy and precision. The method of the disclosure not only uses less organic reagents and causes less environmental pollution, but also reduces matrix interference and improves purification efficiency through optimization of the adsorbent. The method of the disclosure not only is simple to operate and low in cost, but also has less matrix interference and accurate results, and is suitable for the qualitative and quantitative determination of polyphenols in the rapeseed oil.

Claims

1. A method for extracting polyphenols from rapeseed oil, comprising: (1) extracting the rapeseed oil by using a mixed solution of acetonitrile and water as an extractant, performing solid-liquid separation, and collecting a supernatant to obtain an extracting solution; and (2) adding 20 to 35 mg/mL C.sub.18 adsorbent to the extracting solution obtained in step (1), performing solid-liquid separation, and collecting a supernatant to obtain a polyphenol solution.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein a volume ratio of acetonitrile to water in the extractant is (5 to 8):1.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein a mass-volume ratio of rapeseed oil to extractant in step (1) is 0.15 to 0.35 g/mL.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: (1) extracting the rapeseed oil by using the mixed solution of acetonitrile and water as the extractant, and separating extract liquor to obtain the extracting solution, wherein a volume ratio of acetonitrile to water in the extractant is (5 to 8):1, and a mass-volume ratio of rapeseed oil to extractant is 0.15 to 0.35 g/mL; and (2) adding 20 to 35 mg/mL C.sub.18 adsorbent to the extracting solution obtained in step (1), and performing solid-liquid separation to obtain the polyphenol solution.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step (1) further comprises adding anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 and NaCl to cooperate with the extractant.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein a mass ratio of anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 to NaCl is 2:1 to 6:1.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step (1) further comprises performing a freezing treatment on separated liquid to obtain the extracting solution.

8. The method according to claim 4, wherein the step (1) further comprises performing a freezing treatment on separated liquid to obtain the extracting solution.

9. The method according to claim 7, wherein the freezing treatment is performed at a temperature of −15° C. to −20° C. for 1.5 to 2.5 h.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the freezing treatment is performed at a temperature of −15° C. to −20° C. for 1.5 to 2.5 h.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step (2) further comprises adding anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 to be used in combination with the adsorbent, so as to further remove moisture and fatty impurities in the extracting solution to obtain the polyphenol solution.

12. The method according to claim 4, wherein the step (2) further comprises adding anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 to be used in combination with the adsorbent, so as to further remove moisture and fatty impurities in the extracting solution to obtain the polyphenol solution.

13. A method for detecting polyphenols in vegetable oil, comprising pre-treating the vegetable oil to obtain a polyphenol solution by using the method according to claim 1, and then performing detection.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the detection is liquid chromatography detection.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1 is a diagram of the influence of the amount of water on the extraction effect of polyphenols by using Example 1 as a reference;

(2) FIG. 2 is a diagram of the influence of freezing time on the content of matrix co-extracts by using Example 1 as a reference; and

(3) FIG. 3 is a diagram of the influence of the amount of C.sub.18 on the extraction effect of polyphenols by using Example 1 as a reference.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(4) The following examples are used to illustrate the disclosure, but not to limit the scope of the disclosure.

Example 1: Method for Extracting Polyphenols from Rapeseed Oil

(5) Separation treatment: 6.00 g of rapeseed oil was accurately weighed and put into a 50 mL centrifuge tube, 3 mL of water and 18 mL of acetonitrile were added, and shaking was performed for 5 min. 7.2 g of anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 and 1.8 g of NaCl were added, shaking was performed for 2 min, and then centrifugation was performed for 5 min at 4,000 rpm. A supernatant was transferred to a centrifuge tube and frozen for 2 h at −20° C. 9 mL of supernatant was transferred to a 15 mL centrifuge tube, 270 mg of C.sub.18 and 1.8 g of anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 were added, shaking was performed for 2 min, and then centrifugation was performed for 5 min at 4,000 rpm. A supernatant, namely, a polyphenol solution, was obtained.

Example 2: Method for Detecting Polyphenols in Vegetable Oil

(6) Conditions of liquid chromatography: The chromatographic column was Thermo Hypersil GOLD (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.9 μm); the column oven temperature was 35° C.; the sample size was 2 μL; the flow rate was 0.30 mL/min; the mobile phase A was a 0.1% aqueous acetic acid solution; and the mobile phase B was an acetonitrile solution.

(7) (1) Preparation of standard solution: a polyphenol mixed standard solution with a concentration of 200 μg/mL was prepared by using chromatographic grade methanol, and then stored at −20° C. before use. A working solution was prepared by diluting a stock solution with methanol.

(8) (2) Separate determination after diluting standard solution into working solutions of different concentrations with methanol: each concentration was determined 3 times in parallel to obtain linear equations and correlation coefficients of polyphenols. The method detection limit was calculated by 3 times the signal-to-noise ratio, and the method quantification limit was calculated by 10 times the signal-to-noise ratio. The results are shown in Table 1.

(9) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Determination of linear range, detection limit and quantification limit Correlation Linear coefficient range LOD LOQ Compound Regression equation R.sup.2 (μg/mL) (μg/mL) (μg/mL) Protocatechuic Y = 3.0872x + 0.0976 0.9961 0.04-10 0.010 0.033 acid P-hydroxybenzoic Y = 5.0126x + 1.2662 0.9955 0.04-10 0.010 0.033 acid Caffeic acid Y = 0.1727x − 0.0290 0.9977 0.30-10 0.080 0.267 Vanillic acid Y = 0.6213x + 0.3024 0.9964 0.03-10 0.008 0.027 Syringic acid Y = 1.0651x + 0.2823 0.9935 0.03-10 0.008 0.027 P-coumaric acid Y = 3.0005x + 0.9064 0.9925 0.02-10 0.006 0.020 Sinapic acid Y = 0.2064x + 0.0778 0.9902 0.03-10 0.008 0.027 Ferulic acid Y = 2.7085x + 1.2602 0.9945 0.02-10 0.004 0.013 Cinnamic acid Y = 4.7007x + 2.4276 0.9924 0.01-10 0.002 0.007 Sinapine Y = 9.9452x + 6.1696 0.9923 0.02-10 0.004 0.013

(10) (3) 4.5 mL of supernatant (the polyphenol solution obtained in Example 1) was accurately transferred into a nitrogen blowpipe, slowly blown dry in a nitrogen blower, added with 1.5 mL of methanol solution, and filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane into a sample bottle for HPLC-MS determination.

(11) (4) Standard addition recovery rate: 10 μg/g of the standard was added to an actual sample for determination, the process was repeated for 3 times, and the average recovery rate and relative standard deviation (RSD) were calculated. The results are shown in Table 2.

(12) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Determination of standard addition recovery rate Compound Standard addition recovery rate Protocatechuic acid 86.17.sup.a ± 8.03.sup.b P-hydroxybenzoic acid 99.23 ± 4.83 Caffeic acid 91.06 ± 4.13 Vanillic acid 99.53 ± 3.33 Syringic acid 100.34 ± 0.86  P-coumaric acid 99.71 ± 1.48 Sinapic acid 101.90 ± 3.24  Ferulic acid 102.95 ± 1.74  Cinnamic acid 81.31 ± 2.95 Sinapine 97.96 ± 7.90 .sup.arepresents an average recovery rate, %; and .sup.brepresents a relative standard deviation (RSD, %).

Example 3

(13) Referring to Example 1, the extractant was replaced with 7 mL of water and 14 mL of acetonitrile (acetonitrile/water: 2:1), 4.2 mL of water and 16.8 mL of acetonitrile (4:1), and 2.3 mL of water and 18.7 mL of acetonitrile (acetonitrile/water: 8:1), respectively, and other conditions remained unchanged. The obtained supernatant was detected by liquid chromatography, and the average peak area and RSD were calculated. The obtained results are shown in Table 3.

(14) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Detection results of sample prepared in Example 3 Volume ratio Caffeic P-coumaric Sinapic Ferulic of acetonitrile acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area to water (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) 2:1 226120(10.88)  733015(2.21) 333725(6.38)  533467(5.35) 4:1 379940(11.52) 1021980(6.71) 404765(10.75) 767575(9.67) 6:1 564683(9.93)  1132224(2.74) 439369(7.74)  868811(2.18) 8:1 531352(12.44) 1128797(4.33) 426528(10.09) 866902(8.02)

Example 4

(15) Referring to Example 1, the amount of the extractant was replaced with 4.5 mL of water and 27 mL of acetonitrile, and 2.25 mL of water and 13.5 mL of acetonitrile, respectively, and other conditions remained unchanged. The obtained supernatant was detected by liquid chromatography, and the average peak area and RSD were calculated. The obtained results are shown in Table 4.

(16) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Detection results of sample prepared in Example 4 Caffeic P-coumaric Sinapic Ferulic acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area Extractant (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) 2.25 mL of water 288232(12.03)  966108(4.70) 344566(9.57) 716155(3.28) and 13.5 mL of acetonitrile 3 mL of water and 564683(9.93)  1132224(2.74) 439369(7.74) 868811(2.18) 18 mL of acetonitrile 4.5 mL of water and 462570(10.47) 1110167(2.55) 422409(4.10) 821657(5.87) 27 mL of acetonitrile

Example 5

(17) Referring to Example 1, the amount of the adsorbent was replaced with 90 mg, 180 mg, 360 mg, and 450 mg, respectively, and other conditions remained unchanged. The obtained supernatant was detected by liquid chromatography, and the average peak area and RSD were calculated. The obtained results are shown in Table 5.

(18) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Detection results of sample prepared in Example 5 Caffeic P-coumaric Sinapic Ferulic Amount of acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area C.sub.18/mg (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) 90 497706(4.82) 1104624(2.35) 281526(10.04) 845011(2.86) 180 502562(9.83) 1126695(2.69) 284957(11.98) 857426(2.05) 270 564683(9.93) 1132224(2.74) 439369(7.74)  868811(2.18) 360 415247(2.43) 1011740(2.39) 360893(11.75) 769054(2.45) 450 339775(6.87)  993345(4.56) 222556(11.03) 734897(7.35)

Comparative Example 1

(19) Extraction of polyphenols by liquid-liquid extraction technology: 2.50 g of rapeseed oil was accurately weighed, dissolved in 3 mL of n-hexane, and shaken for 1 min. Extraction was performed with 3 mL of methanol solution with a volume fraction of 80% for 3 times, shaking was performed for 5 min each time, and centrifugation was performed for 5 min at 4,000 rpm. The methanol extracting solutions were combined, the extracting solution was slowly blown dry in a nitrogen blower, added with 2.5 mL of methanol solution, and filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane, and a filtrate was collected into a sample bottle.

(20) The method for determining the polyphenol content by using HPLC-MS was the same as the liquid chromatography conditions and steps (1) to (3) of Example 2. The analysis results are shown in Table 6.

Comparative Example 2

(21) Extraction of polyphenols by solid-phase extraction technology: a glycol-based solid-phase extraction column was placed in a solid-phase extraction device, and an SPE column was activated with 5 mL of methanol and 5 mL of n-hexane, respectively. 1.50 g of rapeseed oil was accurately weighed, dissolved in 5 mL of n-hexane, and shaken for 1 min. A sample was loaded into the column, washed with 5 mL of n-hexane and 5 mL of a mixture of n-hexane and ethyl acetate (a ratio of n-hexane to ethyl acetate is 90:10, v/v) by column chromatography sequentially, and finally eluted with 5 mL of methanol solution, an eluate was collected, slowly blown dry in a nitrogen blower, added with 1.5 mL of methanol solution, and filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane, and a filtrate was collected into a sample bottle.

(22) The method for determining the polyphenol content by using HPLC-MS was the same as the liquid chromatography conditions and steps (1) to (3) of Example 2. The analysis results are shown in Table 6.

(23) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Detection results of samples prepared in Comparative Examples 1 and 2 Comparative Comparative Compound Example 1 Example 2 Example 1 Protocatechuic acid 82.53 ± 5.26 65.85 ± 3.05 86.17 ± 8.03 P-hydroxybenzoic acid 76.90 ± 7.82  77.95 ± 10.13 99.23 ± 4.83 Caffeic acid 81.28 ± 8.81 56.98 ± 9.23 91.06 ± 4.13 Vanillic acid 62.16 ± 4.05 52.32 ± 8.51 99.53 ± 3.33 Syringic acid 101.11 ± 7.62  71.54 ± 4.81 100.34 ± 0.86  P-coumaric acid 77.88 ± 9.03 61.31 ± 5.74 99.71 ± 1.48 Sinapic acid 75.39 ± 7.54 83.79 ± 5.58 101.90 ± 3.24  Ferulic acid 66.04 ± 9.65 65.29 ± 7.73 102.95 ± 1.74  Cinnamic acid 81.41 ± 5.44 67.73 ± 3.57 81.31 ± 2.95 Sinapine 105.80 ± 4.80  67.55 ± 8.06 97.96 ± 7.90

(24) From the results in Table 6, it can be seen that the average recovery rate of polyphenols in the rapeseed oil by the developed method is 81.31% to 102.95%, and the RSDs are 0.86% to 8.03%. Compared with the traditional liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction, the method developed by the patent has higher accuracy and precision and better extraction effect. Moreover, compared with liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction, the method not only is simple to operate and low in cost, but also reduces matrix interference by using the C.sub.18 adsorbent for purification, and the results are more accurate.

Comparative Example 3

(25) Referring to Example 1, the extractant was replaced with pure acetonitrile, and other conditions remained unchanged. The obtained polyphenol extracting solution was detected by liquid chromatography, and the average peak area and RSD were calculated. The results are shown in Table 7.

(26) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Detection results of sample obtained in Comparative Example 3 Caffeic P-coumaric Sinapic Ferulic acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area Extractant (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) Acetonitrile 154868(9.34)  674863(4.80) 227807(9.01) 519482(6.05) Acetonitrile 564683(9.93) 1132224(2.74) 439369(7.74) 868811(2.18) and water

Comparative Example 4

(27) Referring to Example 1, the adsorbent was replaced with PSA or GCB, respectively, and other conditions remained unchanged. The obtained polyphenol extracting solution was detected by liquid chromatography. The results are shown in Table 8.

(28) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Detection results of sample obtained in Comparative Example 4 Caffeic P-coumaric Sinapic Ferulic acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area acid/peak area Adsorbent (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) (% RSD) PSA 138529 (8.78) 478271 (3.70) 378770 (4.04) 606039 (3.64) GCB 182310 (3.86) 563629 (4.53) 412811 (6.74) 641664 (4.81) C.sub.18 564683 (9.93) 1132224 (2.74)  439369 (7.74) 868811 (2.18)

(29) Although the disclosure has been disclosed as above in preferred examples, it is not intended to limit the disclosure. Any person skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. The protection scope of the disclosure shall be defined by the claims.