IN SITU DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETECTING MEMBRANE WETTING
20220143554 · 2022-05-12
Inventors
- Noreddine Ghaffour (Thuwal, SA)
- Alla ALPATOVA (Thuwal, SA)
- Adnan QAMAR (Thuwal, SA)
- Mohammed ALHADDAD (Thuwal, SA)
Cpc classification
B01D65/102
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C02F1/008
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D65/109
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2313/903
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01D61/36
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D65/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A membrane wettability system including a power source configured to generate a current; a measuring device configured to measure the current; a first conducting spacer that is electrically connected to one of the measuring device and the power source; and a second conducting spacer that is electrically connected to another one of the measuring device and the power source. The first conducting spacer is physically separated from the second conducting spacer by a membrane, which is not conducting the current.
Claims
1. A membrane wettability system comprising: a power source configured to generate a current; a measuring device configured to measure the current; a first conducting spacer that is electrically connected to one of the measuring device and the power source; and a second conducting spacer that is electrically connected to another one of the measuring device and the power source, wherein the first conducting spacer is physically separated from the second conducting spacer by a membrane which is not conducting the current.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second conducting spacers are in direct contact to the membrane.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second conducting spacers are either made of a non-conducting polymer that is coated with an electrical conducting layer, or they are made entirely of a conducting material.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the electrical conducting layer fully covers the first and second conducting spacers.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the electrical conducting layer partially covers the first and second conducting spacers.
6. The system of claim 3, wherein the first and second conducting spacers are shaped as tubes connected to each other.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the power source is a direct current power source and the measuring device is a multimeter.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising: first and second metal electrodes directly connected to the first and second conducting spacers, respectively, the first metal electrode being connected to the power source and the second metal electrode being connected to the measuring device, wherein the first and second electrodes are selected to not participate in an oxidation or reduction reaction.
9. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a processor configured to calculate an electrical current passing from the first conducting spacer to the second conducting spacer, and also configured to generate an alarm when the electrical current is larger than a given threshold, wherein the alarm is associated with membrane wetting.
10. A membrane distillation system comprising: a membrane distillation cell configured to separate a permeate from a feed with a membrane; a feed container that supplies the feed to the membrane distillation cell; a permeate container that collects the permeate from the membrane distillation cell; and a wettability membrane detecting system configured to determine when the membrane experience a wettability condition, wherein the wettability membrane detecting system comprises: a power source configured to generate a current, a measuring device configured to measure the current, a first conducting spacer that is electrically connected to one of the measuring device and the power source, and a second conducting spacer that is electrically connected to another one of the measuring device and the power source, wherein the first conducting spacer is physically separated from the second conducting spacer by the membrane which is not conducting the current.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the first and second conducting spacers are in direct contact with the membrane.
12. The system of claim 10, wherein the first and second conducting spacers are made of a non-conducting polymer that is coated with an electrical conducting layer.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the first and second conducting spacers are shaped as tubes connected to each other.
14. The system of claim 10, wherein the power source is a direct current power source and the measuring device is a multimeter.
15. The system of claim 10, further comprising: first and second metal electrodes directly connected to the first and second conducting spacers, respectively, the first metal electrode being connected to the power source and the second metal electrode being connected to the measuring device, wherein the first and second electrodes are selected to not participate in an oxidation or reduction reaction.
16. The system of claim 10, further comprising: a processor configured to calculate an electrical current passing from the first conducting spacer to the second conducting spacer, and also configured to generate an alarm when the electrical current is larger than a given threshold, wherein the alarm is associated with the wettability condition.
17. A method for determining a wetting membrane pore condition, the method comprising: sandwiching a membrane between first and second conducting spacers; electrically connecting the first conducting spacer to one of a measuring device and a power source; electrically connecting the second conducting spacer to another one of the measuring device and the power source; generating a current with the power source; measuring the current with the measuring device; and determining that the membrane is experiencing the wetting membrane condition when the measured current is larger than a given threshold, wherein the membrane is not conducting the current.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising: sending an alarm when the current is larger than the given threshold.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0024] The following description of the embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings identify the same or similar elements. The following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims. The following embodiments are discussed, for simplicity, with regard to a single membrane unit. However, the embodiments to be discussed next are not limited to one membrane unit, but may be applied to plural membrane units or to other units that use a membrane that may experience membrane wetting.
[0025] Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the subject matter disclosed. Thus, the appearance of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout the specification is not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
[0026] According to an embodiment, a novel system for detection of membrane wetting is discussed. Such system is desired for maintaining a stable performance of MD operations. The novel system targets the issue of membrane integrity and allows for the early detection of membrane wetting as soon as it appears so that the MD system failures can be minimized. The detection system is implemented at the spacer level. The use of spacers is also expected to maximize permeate production and enhance the biofouling control thereby improving the overall process performance. The novel system can be implemented for any spacer design and geometry including commercial spacers and newly designed spacers. Thus, an existing MD system that uses old spacers can be retrofitted with the novel detection system. The spacer may be made of a polymeric material that is covered with an electrically conducting layer or the spacer may be entirely made of a conducting material. An advantage of the proposed technology is its simplicity and good scalability because it can be implemented by modifying the existing systems.
[0027] In one embodiment, the detection system is expected to achieve continuous, real-time, monitoring of the electrical current during the MD operations, which result in the immediate in situ wetting detection so that the fouling control measures can be applied in a well-timed manner. For example, once an increase in the electrical current is detected by the detection system, the cleaning-in-place (CIP) can be initiated to deter wetting by removing the wetting-causing foulants from the membrane surface. This will minimize membrane damage and enable stable MD operation while producing high quality permeate water.
[0028] The application of the wettability detection system will make the MD process more versatile with a potential expansion to a level where it can be applied to not only drinking water production, but also to non-portable water treatment applications, including irrigation. The suggested technology is viewed as an innovation that could promote commercialization of the MD process from seawater desalination to a wider range of potential practices (municipal wastewater treatment, reclamation of produced water, food industry, etc.). Furthermore, this technology can be applied in any process in which the surface/bulk material wetting is an issue and a dielectric fluid is present in contact with such material.
[0029] Polymeric spacers (i.e., non-conductive spacers) are commonly used in membrane separation to promote turbulence/flow unsteadiness at the membrane surface, which can significantly mitigate fouling-associated issues in the vicinity of the membrane surface [2, 3].
[0030] There is also evidence that the application of spacers in the MD process reduces the temperature polarization and improves the heat transfer coefficient. As a result, the vapor flux across the membrane is enhanced. Furthermore, electrically conductive spacers have been recently probed for the biofouling control in reverse osmosis [4]. With the current advances in membrane separation technology, polymeric spacers are now available in various designs and arrangements so their wide implementation in MD processes is easily achieved.
[0031] According to the embodiment illustrated in
[0032] The spacer 300 shown in
[0033] The DCMD cell 400 is further illustrated in
[0034] An electrical circuit corresponding to the cell 400 in
[0035] However, if the ions 510 are entering together with the steam 512 through the pores 403 as shown in
[0036] Thus, by having the electrical conducting spacers 300A and 300B sandwiching the membrane 402, and electrodes from these spacers being connected to the measuring device 530, allow the operator of the cell 400 to determine as soon as the membrane becomes wet, i.e., ions are passing through the channels of the membrane. By setting a certain threshold at the measuring device 530, or at a processor 540 that is connected to the measuring device 530, it is possible to automatically generate an alarm for the operator when the measured electrical conductivity across the membrane 402 is above a certain limit, which is identified to correspond to membrane wetting.
[0037] In one application, the DCMD cell 400 discussed above is implemented in an actual MD system 600 as illustrated in
[0038] Thus, in one application, the membrane wettability system 640 includes the power source 532, which is configured to generate a current, the measuring device 530, which is configured to measure the current, with first conducting spacer 300A which is electrically connected to the measuring device 530, and the second conducting spacer 300B, which is electrically connected to the power source 532 (or vice versa, i.e. connecting with opposite polarity, the current detection circuit will remain the same in both cases). The first conducting spacer 300A is physically separated from the second conducting spacer 300B by the membrane 402, which is not conducting the current.
[0039] In one application, the first and second conducting spacers are in direct contact to the membrane. The first and second conducting spacers are made of a non-conducting polymer that is coated with an electrical conducting layer. While it is possible that the electrical conducting layer fully covers the first and second conducting spacers, it is also possible that the electrical conducting layer partially covers the first and second conducting spacers.
[0040] Processor 634 may also include a transceiver for communicating with any part of the system 600, but also for being able to transmit an alarm to the operator of the system when the electrical conductivity of the membrane 402 increases over a given limit. Although system 600 is shown in
[0041] There also exists a configuration called “permeate (or “water”) gap membrane distillation” in which the vapor is condensed and accumulated on the other side of membrane and then exits the chamber. In this case, the membrane module is divided into three chambers, the hot chamber is the same as in the DCMD, the middle chamber is filled with the condensed water and separated from the hot chamber by the membrane and by a stainless steel plate from the cold chamber. The coolant water circulates in the cold chamber just like in the DCMD system. The water vapor which passes through the pores of the membrane gets inside the middle chamber, contacts the cold plate and condenses, and then accumulates and fills the middle chamber. When the chamber is full, the condensed water exists it and gets collected. The difference between these two types of MD modules is that in the direct contact system, the vapor condenses into the coolant water stream and in this system the permeate is pure condensate. The principle of wetting detection in both systems would be the same, just in latter system spacer and one of the electrodes will be inserted into the middle chamber. The features discussed above with regard to the system 600 are also applicable to this system. In fact, the features discussed with regard to system 600 are applicable to any MD system.
[0042] Further, a membrane distillation system is understood in this application to mean not only a system that separates fresh water from saltwater by membrane distillation, but also systems that perform similar processes, e.g., gas separation, pervaporation or pervaporative separation, which is a processing method for the separation of mixtures of liquids by partial vaporization through a non-porous or porous membrane.
[0043] To test the membrane wettability of the membrane of the cell 400 discussed above, the inventors have conducted a couple of experiments at the lab scale using custom-made DCMD cells which utilized a 2 cm×10 cm hydrophobic flat-sheet PTFE membrane. The DCMD process was operated with the feed and cold streams flowing in the counter-current direction. The temperatures of the hot feed and cold permeate streams were maintained at 70° C. and 20° C. by using the electrical heater 612 and chiller 622, respectively. The flow rates of both streams were set at 500 mL/min, and were maintained with the pumps 614 and 624. The polymeric spacers 300A and 300B were 3D printed by using acrylic powder and they were coated with platinum having a thickness of 600 nm. A cathodic voltage in a range of 1-2 V was applied by the power source 532 at the permeate side of the membrane.
[0044] Four different DCMD experiments were conducted by using the following feed and coolant solutions:
[0045] (1) Ultrapure water (resistance of 0.1 MΩ.Math.cm at 25° C. and conductivity of 10 μS/cm) at both the feed and coolant sides (called herein the control 1 experiment).
[0046] (2) 15 g/L of sodium chloride (NaCl) electrolyte solution at both the feed and coolant sides (called herein the control 2 experiment).
[0047] (3) 15 g/L NaCl electrolyte solution and ultrapure water at the feed and coolant sides, respectively (called herein the normal DCMD experiment).
[0048] (4) After completion of the experiment (3), the membrane was wetted with ethyl alcohol (C.sub.2H.sub.5OH) and the DCMD process was resumed (called herein the DCMD experiment with wetted membrane).
[0049] The purpose of the control and normal DCMD experiments was to probe the electrical current (electrical conductivity) in the system under conditions in which the membrane pores are not wetted. The obtained trends were then compared to the results achieved in the experiment (4), when the pore wetting was induced by the addition of the ethyl alcohol. As illustrated in
[0050] The early detection of membrane wetting is desired in maintaining a stable performance of MD operations in real world distillation plants. The novel cell 400 that has a membrane wettability detection system targets the fundamental issue of membrane integrity and allows for the early detection of membrane wetting, as soon as it appears so that the MD system's failures can be minimized. The use of electrically conductive spacers is also expected to maximize permeate production and enhance the biofouling control thereby improving the overall process performance; it is also applicable for any spacer design including commercial spacers and newly designed spacers. The novel cell has an advantage that can be scaled and retroactively implemented in the existing plants.
[0051] It is expected that continuous real-time monitoring of the electrical current during the MD operations will result in the immediate in situ wetting detection so that the fouling control measures can be applied in a well-timed manner. For example, once an increase in the electrical current 540 is detected, the CIP can be initiated to deter wetting by removing the wetting-causing foulants from the membrane surface. This will minimize membrane damage and enable stable MD operation while producing high quality permeate water. Furthermore, this technology can be applied in any process in which surface/bulk material wetting is an issue and dielectric fluid is present in contact with such material.
[0052] A method for determining a wetting membrane condition, which is illustrated in
[0053] The disclosed embodiments provide a membrane wettability detection system for detecting when a membrane loses its distillation properties. It should be understood that this description is not intended to limit the invention. On the contrary, the embodiments are intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which are included in the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Further, in the detailed description of the embodiments, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the claimed invention. However, one skilled in the art would understand that various embodiments may be practiced without such specific details.
[0054] Although the features and elements of the present embodiments are described in the embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements of the embodiments or in various combinations with or without other features and elements disclosed herein.
[0055] This written description uses examples of the subject matter disclosed to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the same, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the subject matter is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims.
REFERENCES
[0056] Ahmed, F. E., B. S. Lalia, and R. Hashaikeh, Membrane-based detection of wetting phenomenon in direct contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017. 535: p. 89-93.
[0057] Mo, H. and H. Y. Ng, An experimental study on the effect of spacer on concentration polarization in a long channel reverse osmosis membrane cell. Water Science and Technology, 2010. 61(8): p. 2035-2041.
[0058] Bucs, S. S., et al., Effect of different commercial feed spacers on biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane systems: A numerical study. Desalination, 2014. 343: p. 26-37.
[0059] Baek, Y., et al., Electroconductive Feed Spacer as a Tool for Biofouling Control in a Membrane System for Water Treatment. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2014. 1(2): p. 179-184.