Differential gravity power generator
20220145864 · 2022-05-12
Inventors
Cpc classification
F05B2220/703
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05B2250/22
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03G7/104
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03B17/005
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03B17/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
Differential gravity power generator FIG. 1 consisting of a box height H, filled with fluid, subject to gravity. The box is divided into T.sub.1 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8) and T.sub.2 (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8) by plane (2, 3, 5, 8) with openings A above and B below. The difference of effective head of T.sub.2 over T.sub.1 is ⅓H, resulting in a fluid flow from T.sub.2 to T.sub.1 through B. From the continuity equation an equal quantity of fluid flows from T.sub.1 to T.sub.2 through A, establishing a fluid conserving motion, demonstrated with working models. Applications: electricity generation with water or other fluid like liquid CO.sub.2 and motive purposes like propulsion of ships.
Claims
1. Gravity power generator, characterized by two containers 1 and 2 of equal height and known geometry, like a triangular wedge, cone or pyramid, filled with incompressible fluid and subject to a downward attractive gravity field. The centers of gravity of the fluids in 1 and 2 are known from geometry. The orientation of 1 is top-up; that of 2 is top-down. Consequently the potential energy density of the fluid in 1 is smaller than in 2, by a known amount. By connecting 1 and 2 with a gate A above and with another gate B below, fluid flows from 2 through B into 1. By mass conservation an equal amount of fluid flows back from 1 through A to 2, thus creating a gravity driven power generator, with cyclic fluid. Dissipative losses of the embodiment can be taken into account in the capacity factor.
2. Method according to claim 1, applied for the generation of electricity, in a fixed embodiment either above ground or dig in, or in a floating embodiment, with a reaction type turbine-generator, installed in the gate B below between the containers.
3. Method according to claims 1 and 2 in a floating embodiment, applied in configurations suitable for the propulsion of ships, for the main propulsion as well as for auxiliaries, like to serve as bow thruster.
4. Method according to claims 1 and 2 with water as fluid, with antifreeze added for application in cold climate.
5. Method according to claim 4 with water as fluid, to which a solute is added to enhance the density of the solution.
6. Method according to claims 1 and 2, with CO.sub.2 fluid in closed containers, at suitable temperature and pressure.
7. Method according to claim 1, applied to air at atmospheric pressure, for the calculation of the natural ventilation capacity of buildings, in particular of pyramid homes.
8. Method according to claims 1 and 2, characterized by the application of a temperature gradient across a temperature region containing the critical temperature of the fluid where the density changes with temperature are large, in such a way that the density of the fluid flowing through gate B into container 1 becomes much smaller than the average density of the fluid in the containers 1 and 2. Consequently the float up of the lighter fluid that passes through gate B into container 1 will be stimulated by the higher buoyancy of the surrounding heavier fluid in 1.
Description
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF FIG. 1
[0011]
PREFERRED APPLICATIONS
[0012] 1. T.sub.1T.sub.2—Model as in
Second example. The rectangular box is of glass (aquarium), with L=W=0.3 m, H=0.4 m, slanted plane of concrete casing 0.3×0.58 m. B: Ø 22 mm, A: Ø 12 mm. The initial flow is about 1 cm/s during 45 minutes. The long time evolution of the flow is between 2-8 mm/s with diurnal variation, experimental duration was one week.
Third example. To mimic Boyle's self-flowing flask [2], T.sub.2: H=0.6 m, L=0.4 m, W=0.25 m and T.sub.1: H=0.6 m, L=0.14 m and W=3.5 cm. The common plane of T.sub.1 and T.sub.2 is now vertical, A: Ø 8 mm, B: Ø 25 mm, distance A−B is 0.5 m. Material: concrete casing. Observation: In the stationary state the initial flow velocity is between 2-3 cm/s, largest at the center of the flow. After half an hour the flow slows down to 1-5 mm/s with diurnal variation, experimental duration: one week. This is a working Boyle's self-flowing flask [2].
Other examples are: top up cone C.sub.1 (of height H, effective head ¼H) and top down cone C.sub.2 (effective head ¾H), or top up pyramid P.sub.1 (effective head ¼H) and top down pyramid P.sub.2 (effective head ¾H) or combination thereof can be used. A cylinder or a rectangular box has an effective head % H. It follows that the effective head of a C.sub.1C.sub.2 or P.sub.1P.sub.2 combination is % H, the same [4] as for traditional (flow through) hydro power plant.
[0013] 2. Capacity P for a T.sub.1T.sub.2 Configuration.
H=L=W, effective head ⅓H, ρ=10.sup.3 kg/m.sup.3, g=9.8 m/s.sup.2, Q=B (⅔ g H).sup.1/2, choosing for B=0.09 H.sup.2. The density p can be enhanced by 5 to 10 times by using a solution, see [11] for a suitable choice of solutes.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Capacity P = 0.75 H.sup.7/2 kW, H in meter H (m) P (kW) H (m) P (MW) 1 0.75 10 2.3 2 8 20 26 3 35 30 110 4 96 40 300 5 200 50 660 6 400 60 1250 7 680 70 2150 8 1080 80 3430 9 1640 90 5180
For comparison: Biggest wind turbine to date is 10 MW, gas turbine 571 MW, steam turbine 1750 MW/GE Arabelle 1700 and marine engine 81 MW/Wärtsilä TRA 96 [12].
[0014]
[0015] 3. Use of other fluids, like liquid CO.sub.2 at temperatures >−55° C. For suitable pressures see the phase diagram of CO.sub.2 in the literature. The Importance for application on earth and on Mars is already mentioned in the description.
[0016] 4. The beneficial effect of pyramid home, height H, is due to the difference of the effective air head of the surroundings (½H) and the effective air head in the top up pyramid (¼H). The differential head is ¼H. The density of air is 800 times smaller than that of water. The capacity P.sub.air=0.6 H.sup.7/2 Watt. For H=10 m P.sub.air=1.9 kW, for H=15 m P.sub.air=7.8 kW for quiet fresh air circulation through the pyramid home, contributing to the ambient comfort. This occurs even during wind stillness.
Discussion
[0017] Assad mentioned [8] p. 2 “How invention works: The water fall from valve under tank and make shield motion”. At end of p. 2: “Water Return Rising by one way valves and by inversing Power with shield”. Comment: 1. One-way valves do not rise the water, only prevent back flow. 2. “The shield is moved by the falling water, then inversely the shield motion is used to rise the water”. Comment: Even if it works this kind of pump storage method costs more energy than it produces and it is not used in the application.
[0018] Moncada Rodriguez, in [9] p. 6 claim 1 lines 2-18, used a cylindrical tank, with conical bottom, as hydraulic head, connected to a U shaped tube, one end at tank bottom, other end at the side inlet at the water level of the tank. Comment:1. Effective head of a cylinder is the same as that of the small tube aside the cylinder, so there will be no flow (communicating vessels with equal effective heads). 2.
[0019] It is emphasized that the comments do not questioned the validity of the inventions [8, 9], but only point out the different methods they used, which are not borrowed by the application. It is concluded that [8, 9] are not relevant prior arts for the present invention.
NOTE Related to the Written Opinion of the International Search Report SN73827
[0020] No change needs to be made in the text of the application, as justified below. ItemV1, 1.1 D1(US20130062887A1), D2(WO2010017607A2+A3), D3(WO2004094816 A1)
[0021] The written opinion is wrong, as the embodiment is in interaction (strength P, Eq. 1) with earth. It is not an isolated system, see page 2 lines 11-13. The first law of Thermodynamics, stating that the energy of an isolated system is constant, does not apply to the case. Consequently, the written opinion item V 1 and 1.1 should be rejected as being mistaken and invalid comments. Moreover, the last sentence in item V 1.1 incorrectly cites: “continuous” which is not present in the cited page 3 lines 17-18.
[0022] Item V 2: D1, 2 and D3 compared to D4 (application). Capacity: P−QρgH: D1: Inventive step is changing g at different parts of the water, by diffraction of presumed outgoing earth's gravity wave. There is no cross-reference (cf. D1) validating the assumption. But even if such a wave (by static earth) would exist, then still the inventive step of D1 differs from that in D4. D4 creates different effective heads, ⅓H in T.sub.1 and ⅔H in T.sub.2, page 2 lines 1-8.
D2: Its international search report states: “no meaningful international search can be carried out”. However,
D3 is already discussed on page 5 lines 15-20. That position is maintained.
Working models: D1, D2 and D3: None. D4: Yes, several.
[0023] Finally: As test of the smallest ship engine, page 4 line 31, experiments were done with a funnel as C.sub.2, page 4 line 1 and 2. At water level: Inlets 2×7 Ø 2 cm (with momentum compensation). Horizontal outlet Ø12 mm below in funnel shaft, opening of shaft end is taped off. Funnel height 18 cm, opening Ø=28 cm, material: plastic (floats in water). Observation: Funnel moves in opposite direction as the outlet, which is proof of concept.
Remark Regarding Gravitational Waves
[0024] With regard to the assumption of gravitational waves in D1, page 6 lines 4, 11-16, experts stated that gravitational waves of the earth is far too small to be measureable with existing instruments, see e.g. [15]. The earth lacks of mass and acceleration/spinning rate to create gravitational waves. Therefore, the assumption makes no sense at all.
REFERENCES
[0025] [1] Bhaskara II (1150), https://en.wlkipedia.org/wiki/Bhaskara's wheel. [0026] [2] Boyle's self-flowing flask (1685), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert Boyle. [0027] [3] Genswein A., Kreisprozess zur Gewinnung technischer Arbeit aus dem Schwerkraftfeld (Gravitationsfeld) der Erde, DE 3716093 A1, 28 Jan. 1988. [0028] [4] Emid S., High capacity factor hydro power plant with variable intake, NL 1041539, application Oct. 20, 2015, publication date 10 May 2017. [0029] [5] Malcherek A., History of the Torricelli Principle and a New Outflow Theory, J. Hydraul. Eng. 2016,142(11), 1-7. [0030] [6] Malcherek A., Die irrtümliche Herleitung der Torricelli-Formel aus der Bernoulli-Gleichung, WasserWirtschaft 2/3 (2016) 75-80. [0031] [7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual motion. [0032] [8] Assad, Beshara, Plant for generation of electricity from force of gravity, WO 2004/094816 A1, 4 Nov. 2004. [0033] [9] Moncada Rodriguez O. E., Water gravity loop power plant (WGLPP) U.S. Pat. No. 9,677,536 B2, 13 Jun. 2017. [0034] [10] Redfield A. G., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redfield equation. [0035] [11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solubility table. [0036] [12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma Maersk [0037] [13] S. Emid, Differential gravity power generator, NL 1043242, application date 26 Apr. 2019, of which this PCT application is a faithful copy. Priority call 1. [0038] [14] S. Emid, Carbon dioxide power generation, NL 1043369, application date 18 Sep. 2019. Priority call 2. [0039] [15] Sources and Types of Gravitational Waves, ligo.caltech.edu/page/gw-sources.