ACTIVELY DEFORMABLE METAMIRROR

Abstract

An optical assembly including a plurality of metamirrors, where each metamirror includes a substrate, a reflective layer formed to the substrate, an array of optical metaelements extending from the reflective layer and an array of micro-actuators coupled to the substrate opposite to the reflective layer. The combination of the micro-actuators are controlled to control the orientation and bending of the metamirrors to set how the metaelements focus a light beam that is reflected off of the reflective layers.

Claims

1. An optical assembly comprising: a plurality of metamirrors each including an array of optical metaelements formed to a reflective surface and an array of micro-actuators, wherein the metaelements in all of the metamirrors combine to focus a light beam that is reflected off of the reflective surfaces to a common focal point; and a controller for controlling the micro-actuators to bend the reflective surfaces and control the focusing effect of the metaelements.

2. The optical assembly according to claim 1 wherein each of the metamirrors includes a plurality of sub-metamirrors.

3. The optical assembly according to claim 1 wherein each of the metamirrors includes a substrate coupled to the actuator, and wherein the reflective surface is a reflective layer formed on the substrate.

4. The optical assembly according to claim 1 wherein the controller changes the length of the micro-actuators to bend the reflective surface.

5. The optical assembly according to claim 4 wherein the micro-actuators are piezoelectric elements.

6. The optical assembly according to claim 1 wherein at least some of the reflective surfaces of the metamirrors are pre-tilted relative to each other.

7. The optical assembly according to claim 1 wherein the optical assembly is part of a telescope.

8. The optical assembly according to claim 1 wherein the plurality of metamirrors are arranged together in a tiled manner.

9. The optical assembly according to claim 8 wherein the metamirrors have a hexagonal shape.

10. An optical assembly comprising a plurality of metamirrors, where each metamirror includes a substrate, a reflective layer formed to the substrate, an array of optical metaelements extending from the reflective layer and an actuator assembly having an array of micro-actuators coupled to the substrate opposite to the reflective layer, said micro-actuators being controlled to control the orientation and bending of the metamirrors to control how a combination of the metaelements focus a light beam that is reflected off of the reflective layers.

11. The optical assembly according to claim 10 wherein the micro-actuators are piezoelectric elements.

12. The optical assembly according to claim 10 wherein at least some of the substrates of the metamirrors are pre-tilted relative to each other.

13. The optical assembly according to claim 10 wherein the plurality of metamirrors are arranged together in a tiled manner.

14. The optical assembly according to claim 13 wherein the metamirrors have a hexagonal shape.

15. The optical assembly according to claim 10 wherein the optical assembly is part of a telescope.

16. A metamirror comprising an array of optical metaelements formed to a reflective surface and an actuator, said metaelements combining to focus a light beam that is reflected off of the reflective surface to a focal point and said actuator being controlled to control the orientation and bending of the metamirror to control how the metaelements focus the light beam.

17. The metamirror according to claim 16 further comprising a substrate coupled to the actuator, wherein the reflective surface is a reflective layer formed on the substrate.

18. The metamirror according to claim 16 wherein the actuator includes an array of micro-actuators, where the length of the micro-actuators is controlled to bend the reflective surface.

19. The metamirror according to claim 19 wherein the extension elements are piezoelectric elements.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0008] FIG. 1 is a front view of an optical metamirror assembly having a plurality of tiled metamirrors;

[0009] FIG. 2 is a side illustration of the optical metamirror assembly shown in FIG. 1;

[0010] FIG. 3 is an isometric view of a metamirror; and

[0011] FIG. 4 is an illustration showing the bending geometry of a metamirror relative to a focal length.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0012] The following discussion of the embodiments of the disclosure directed to an actively deformable metamirror is merely exemplary in nature, and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure or its applications or uses.

[0013] The present disclosure proposes an optical metamirror including an array of metaelements being formed to a reflective surface and micro-actuators so as to form an adaptive optics having application, for example, in a telescope. Light that impinges on the metamirror is altered by the metaelements, reflected by the reflective surface and again altered by the metaelements to provide light focusing. The micro-actuators are controlled to tilt the metamirror and/or bend the reflective surface so as to control the focusing effect of the metaelements.

[0014] FIG. 1 is a front illustration of an optical metamirror assembly 10 for focusing a light beam that includes metamirrors of the type generally referred to above. The assembly 10 includes a plurality of hexagonal-shaped metamirrors 12 arranged in a tiled configuration, where the assembly 10 defines a round aperture 14, such as the aperture of a telescope. It is noted that the size, number and shape of the metamirrors 12 and the shape of the aperture 14 are merely shown as examples and can be generally selected for any suitable application or manufacturing capability. Each metamirror 12 includes a substrate 20 with a reflective surface, such as a metalized reflective layer 22 formed on the substrate 20, and a number of metaelements 24 also formed on the substrate 20 by any suitable process, such as lithography processes used to fabricate semiconductor devices. It is noted that the metaelements 24 are shown much larger than they would be in practice merely for illustrative purposes. It is also noted that in alternate embodiments, for example due to fabrication limitations, each metamirror 12 can include a combination of a number of smaller sub-metamirrors of any suitable shape and size.

[0015] The metaelements 24 extend from the substrate 20 to any suitable height, such as 50-200 nm, and have any suitable shape that alters or focusses light at the desired wavelength consistent with the discussion herein, where the assembly is configured to operate over a range of wavelengths. Further, the metaelements 24 can be of different shapes across the metamirror 12. Light that impinges the metamirrors 12 is first altered by the metaelements 24, then reflected by the reflective layer 22 and then altered again by the metaelements 24 to be focused at a focal point. As will be discussed in detail below, each of the metamirrors 12 is actuatable relative to the other metamirrors 12 so that the metamirrors 12 can be tilted relative to each other and the focusing of the light can be controlled.

[0016] FIG. 2 is a side illustration of the assembly 10. Each of the metamirrors 12 includes a micro-actuator assembly 30 having a base portion 32 and a high-density array 34 of micro-actuators 36 extending therefrom whose length can be controllably changed, where an end of the micro-actuators 36 is formed to an opposite side of the substrate 20 from the reflective layer 22. In one non-limiting, the micro-actuators 36 are piezoelectric elements that can be shortened or lengthened by applying an appropriate electrical signal thereto from, for example, a controller 38. Thus, each of the metamirrors 12 can be tilted or bent independently of the other metamirrors 12 to selectively focus the light. Some of the metamirrors 12 can be pre-tilted to bring light reflected from the array 10 into an approximate common focus, where the outer metamirrors 12 may have more tilt, and the micro-actuators 36 are used to bring all of the metamirrors 12 into a common fine focus. In addition to focus control, active and adaptive optics control is used to correct for imperfections and error in the individual metamirrors 12, as well as mitigate the effects from segmentation and chromatic aberrations. An additional advantage of the actuation of the metamirrors 12 includes the ability to adjust optical performance in real time, for example, compensating for environmental, mechanical stresses and atmospheric disturbances. Challenges include the mitigation of chromatic aberration and controlling dispersion from the metamirrors 12.

[0017] The metamirrors 12 are hexagonal in the embodiment discussed above, but other shapes may be applicable. FIG. 3 is an isometric view of a metamirror 40 similar to the metamirror 12, but having a rectangular shape to illustrate this point. As above, the metamirror 40 includes a micro-actuator assembly 42 having base portion 44 and an array 46 of micro-actuators 48 extending therefrom. A substrate 50 is formed on the micro-actuators 48 and includes a reflective surface 52. An array of metaelements 54 is formed to the substrate 50 and extends therefrom.

[0018] There are two effects that are expected from active mirror deformation on optical properties including geometric optics effects and changes in optical dispersion resulting from displacement of metamirror structures. FIG. 4 is an illustration showing the bending geometry of a mirror 60 having a focal length f, where line 62 represents the mirror 60 when it is flat and line 64 represents the mirror 60 when it is curved, and where the metaelements are not shown. Although the discussion below is a two-dimensional description, it will be understood that the mirror 60 is three-dimensional, and is circular in this non-limiting embodiment. The distances d and d.sup.I represent the relative phases, i.e., modulo of the wavelength, imparted by the flat and bent (curved) lines 62 and 64, respectively, of the mirror 60 at position r along the flat and curved lines 62 and 64, where r is assumed to be the same. These are the phase changes that are needed to reflect a downward impinging vertical light ray to a focus at point O. The value t is the displacement of the point on the mirror 60 when it is flat at point r to the equivalent point on the mirror 60 when it is curved. For small displacement (micrometers) this is the same as the small arc shown in this example. It is also assumed that the deformation of the mirror 60 is circular with a radius of curvature R much larger than the diameter D of the mirror 60. In these conditions, the focus f, as a function of the radius r.sub.m of the mirror 60 and the maximum displacement at the edge t.sub.m of the mirror 60, is given as:

f(t.sub.m)=1/2(r.sub.m.sup.2−dI.sub.0.sup.2)/(dI.sub.0+t.sub.m)   (1)

where dI.sub.0 is the phase (modulo the light wavelength) needed for focusing the flat, un-deformed mirror 60 at the edge t.sub.m of the mirror 60.

[0019] As an example, the case of a 1 cm diameter flat metamirror with a numerical aperture NA=0.2 and a focal length of f=2.4495 cm is analyzed. For a maximum displacement (up) of the edge t.sub.m of the mirror 60 by 10 micrometers, a reduction of the focal length of about 0.5 mm is obtained, which demonstrates a significant degree of focus control through the active optics approach discussed herein, and will greatly facilitate the assembly and focusing of the optical metamirror assembly 10.

[0020] Another important advantage of using this active optical correction approach on segmented metamirrors is the ability to relax the condition given by the constraint imposed by the maximum phase change needed for a given diameter metamirror, where the condition is given by:

D×NA×Δω<2cΔΦ,   (2)

where D is the metamirror diameter, NA is the numerical aperture, Δω is the bandwidth, c is the speed of light and ΔΦ is the phase change.

[0021] By employing physical deformations obtainable from actuator arrays, violations of the inequality of equation (2) that occur when using a significantly larger diameter metamirror can be compensated for. From equation (1), the required maximum deformation of the edge t.sub.m of the mirror 60 can be calculated that is necessary to either significantly increase the effective diameter D of the mirror 60 or the bandwidth as needed while keeping the metamirror phase profile fixed as fabricated. For the focusing example given above, if the edge t.sub.m of the mirror 60 is increased to around 230 micrometers, the diameter D of the mirror 60 can be effectively increased by 20%, or approximately span the entire visible spectrum. This can enable the fabrication of metamirrors having a diameter of several centimeter without the use of extremely large phase changes. Such an actively corrected metamirror array can also be combined with computational image correction techniques to improve overall optical performance.

[0022] The remaining impact of metamirror deformation on optical performance includes changes expected in metamirror nanostructure spacing and orientation. This involves coupled near-field Mie scattering of light from two or more adjacent dielectric nanostructures that include the mirror 60. These nanostructures, typically rectangular dielectric solids up to 1 um in height, would expect to have their relative spacing and orientations modified by bending of the mirror 60. The distance between the elements will change by an amount close to half the ratio of the mirror thickness to the radius of curvature depending on the elastic modulus of the various materials in the mirror 60. An approximate calculation shows that a 10 μm displacement on a 1 cm metamirror corresponds to a radius of curvature of 3 m. If the thickness of the mirror 60 is 500 μm, which is a typical wafer thickness, the change in spacing is about 0.02%. This has a negligible impact on the performance.

[0023] The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined in the following claims.