SAMPLE PAD FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS KIT, AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR
20230255528 · 2023-08-17
Assignee
Inventors
- Seong Eun PARK (Suwon-si, KR)
- Byeong Joon LEE (Daegu, KR)
- Ji Soo WON (Jecheon-si, KR)
- Woong Gi JANG (Wonju-si, KR)
Cpc classification
A61B5/150274
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a sample pad for a medical diagnosis kit, and a production method therefor, and more specifically relates to a sample pad for a medical diagnosis kit, the sample pad being characterized by comprising softwood pulp, PET fibres, binder fibres, and a wet-strength enhancer, and a production method therefor.
Claims
1. A sample pad comprising: 60 to 75 parts by weight of a coniferous pulp; 10 to 20 parts by weight of a PET fiber; 10 to 20 parts by weight of a binder fiber; and 1 to 5 parts by weight of a wet strengthening agent.
2. The sample pad according to claim 1, wherein the coniferous pulp has a length of 2.0 to 3.0 mm and a coarseness of 0.15 to 0.25 mg/m, the PET fiber has a fiber diameter of 1 to 3 de and a length of 3 to 12 mm, the binder fiber is low melting point polyethylene terephthalate (PET) having an average melting point of 100° C. to 150° C., and the wet strengthening agent is an epoxy-based resin.
3. The sample pad according to claim 2, wherein the sample pad is configured such that a wicking rate of 24 to 28 sec/4 cm and a water absorption of 60 to 70 mg/cm.sup.2 are satisfied.
4. The sample pad according to claim 3, wherein the sample pad is used for medical diagnosis kits.
5. A method of manufacturing the sample pad according to claim 1, the method comprising: (a) preparing 60 to 75 parts by weight of a coniferous pulp, 10 to 20 parts by weight of a PET fiber, 10 to 20 parts by weight of a binder fiber, and 1 to 5 parts by weight of a wet strengthening agent as raw materials; (b) mixing the prepared raw materials to prepare a raw material mixture; (c) laminating the raw material mixture on a mesh belt; and (d) dehydrating the raw material mixture laminated on the mesh belt.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein in step (b), 60 to 75 parts by weight of the coniferous pulp, 10 to 20 parts by weight of the PET fiber, and 10 to 20 parts by weight of the binder fiber are mixed in 9,000 to 11,000 parts by weight of an aqueous wet strengthening agent solution, and the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution comprises 9,000 to 11,000 parts by weight of water and 1 to 5 parts by weight of an epoxy resin.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein in step (b), 60 to 75 parts by weight of the coniferous pulp, 10 to 20 parts by weight of the PET fiber, and 10 to 20 parts by weight of the binder fiber are mixed in 9,500 to 10,500 parts by weight of the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution, and the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution comprises 9,000 to 11,000 parts by weight of the water and 1 to 5 parts by weight of the epoxy resin.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein step (d) comprises: a primary vacuum hydration step of sequentially applying vacuum pressures of 0 to 5 cmHg, 10 to 20 cmHg, 30 to 40 cmHg, and 50 to 65 cmHg; and a secondary vacuum hydration step of applying a vacuum pressure of 18 to 22 cmHg.
9. The method according to claim 8, further comprising: (e) a drying step performed after step (d), wherein in step (e), hot air drying at 110 to 130° C., hot air drying at 135 to 145° C., hot air drying at 100 to 110° C., and hot air drying at 135 to 145° C. are sequentially performed.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0027]
BEST MODE
[0028] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to preferred embodiments of the present invention and the drawings. This means that the embodiments are described in detail to such an extent that a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains can easily implement the invention and do not limit the technical idea and category of the present invention.
[0029] All terms, including technical and scientific terms, have the same meanings as those commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains, unless otherwise defined. Commonly used terms, such as those defined in typical dictionaries, should be interpreted as being consistent with the contextual meaning of the relevant art, and are not to be construed in an ideal or overly formal sense unless expressly defined to the contrary.
[0030] Hereinafter, a sample pad for medical diagnosis kits according to the present invention and a method of manufacturing the same will be described in detail.
[0031] First, the sample pad for medical diagnosis kits according to the present invention includes a coniferous pulp, a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fiber, a binder fiber, and a wet strengthening agent.
[0032] In a basic mechanism of action of the sample pad, a capillary phenomenon due to porosity of the pad, which is a structural characteristic of the pad, and wettability of a raw material, which is a chemical characteristic of the raw material, occur in combination, whereby a liquid-state sample is horizontally and vertically moved in a solid-state sample pad.
[0033] When the sample pad is designed, therefore, a raw material having a physical structure and a chemical structure capable of satisfying both the capillary phenomenon and the wettability described above must be selected, and selection of a mixing ratio is very important.
[0034] The coniferous pulp that reveals strength characteristics of the sample pad such that the capillary phenomenon and the wettability can occur simultaneously preferably has a length of 2.0 to 3.0 mm, a coarseness 0.15 to 0.25 mg/m, and an initial freeness of 500 to 700 ml CSF, and more preferably has a length of 2.6 to 2.8 mm, a coarseness of 0.18 to 0.20 mg/m, and an initial freeness of 650 to 700 ml CSF.
[0035] The PET fiber is a material that is added such that the capillary phenomenon of the sample pad can be more securely realized. That is, as being mixed with the coniferous pulp, the PET fiber forms a flow path of the sample pad, and, as a result, the sample pad has a porous structure in all X, Y, and Z-axis directions. Of course, at least one of a polypropylene fiber, a carbon fiber, and a glass fiber may be further included, or any one thereof may be used instead of the PET fiber. However, a dispersant or a pH adjuster must also be added, and since the dispersant or the pH adjuster may remain in the sample pad, thereby affecting the result of detection, the PET fiber, which requires neither a dispersant nor pH adjustment, is most preferable.
[0036] Here, the PET fiber preferably has a diameter of 1 to 3 de and a length of 3 to 12 mm, and more preferably has a diameter of 1.5 to 2.5 de and a length of 3 to 6 mm.
[0037] The binder fiber binds the coniferous pulp and the PET fiber to each other to maintain the external shape of the sample pad.
[0038] In order to perform the above function, the binder fiber may be a low melting point fiber having an average melting point of 100° C. to 150° C., e.g. polyethylene terephthalate (PET) having a diameter of 1.5 to 2.5 de, a length of 5 to 7 mm, and a melting point of about 110° C.
[0039] Here, the low melting point polyethylene terephthalate preferably has a sheath-core structure such that appropriate pores can be formed at the time of binding, and the ratio of sheath to core is more preferably 3 to 7 (sheath):7 to 3 (core), and most preferably 5 (sheath) to 5 (core).
[0040] The wet strengthening agent is added in order to reduce paper fracture during a process and to maintain the shape of a sample and a buffer solution at the time of addition thereof.
[0041] In order to perform the above function, the wet strengthening agent is preferably made of a urea-formaldehyde resin, a melamine-formaldehyde resin, an epoxy resin, or polyethyleneimine (PEI). In particular, the epoxy-based resin is most preferable since the epoxy resin inhibits swelling of the PET fiber and the binder fiber, and therefore when the sample and an analysis solution are absorbed into the sample pad, the sample and the analysis solution are not deformed, whereby the sample and the analysis solution are smoothly movable.
[0042] Meanwhile, it is preferable for the coniferous pulp, the PET fiber, and the binder fiber to be mixed in a weight ratio of 60 to 75:5 to 25:10 to 20, and it is preferable for the wet strengthening agent to be added so as to account for 1 to 5 parts by weight.
[0043] If the content of the coniferous pulp is less than the above range, hygroscopicity is low, whereby the wicking rate of the sample is lowered when being applied to a diagnosis kit. If the content of the coniferous pulp is greater than the above range, on the other hand, hygroscopicity is excessively high. For these reasons, it is preferable for the content of the coniferous pulp to be within the above range.
[0044] If the content of the PET fiber is less than the above range, hygroscopicity is nonuniform. If the content of the PET fiber is greater than the above range, on the other hand, hygroscopicity is low, and wet strength is low. For these reasons, it is preferable for the content of the PET fiber to be within the above range.
[0045] Also, if the content of the binder fiber is less than the above range, the force of binding between fibers is low. If the content of the binder fiber is greater than the above range, on the other hand, the content of the coniferous pulp and the content of the PET fiber are relatively small, whereby hygroscopicity is low. For these reasons, it is preferable for the content of the binder fiber to be within the above range.
[0046] If the content of the wet strengthening agent is greater than the above range, hygroscopicity is low. If the content of the wet strengthening agent is less than the above range, wet strength is low. For these reasons, it is preferable for the content of the wet strengthening agent to be within the above range.
[0047] As a result, when the above mixing ratio is satisfied, the wicking rate, 24 to 28 sec/4 cm, and the water absorption, 60 to 70 mg/cm.sup.2, of the sample pad required for medical diagnosis kits are simultaneously satisfied.
[0048] Next, a method of manufacturing a sample pad for diagnosis kits according to the present invention will be described.
[0049] As shown in
[0050] First, when describing (a) the step of preparing raw materials in more detail, this step is a step of individually preparing a coniferous pulp, a PET fiber, a binder fiber, and a solvent.
[0051] Here, the solvent, which allows the respective raw materials to be uniformly mixed with each other, may be an aqueous solution having a wet strengthening agent dissolved therein (hereinafter referred to as an aqueous wet strengthening agent solution). As an example, water and the wet strengthening agent may be mixed in a weight ratio of 9,000 to 11,000:1 to 5.
[0052] Meanwhile, concrete physical properties and functions related to the coniferous pulp, the PET fiber, the binder fiber, and the wet strengthening agent were previously described, and therefore a duplicative description thereof will be omitted.
[0053] (b) The step of mixing the prepared raw materials to prepare a raw material mixture is a step of putting the coniferous pulp, the PET fiber, and the binder fiber in the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution and stirring the same to prepare a slurry type raw material mixture.
[0054] At this time, it is preferable to mix 9,500 to 10,500 parts by weight of the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution, 60 to 75 parts by weight of the coniferous pulp, 10 to 20 parts by weight of the PET fiber, and 10 to 20 parts by weight of the binder fiber with each other.
[0055] Meanwhile, it is preferable for the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution to be heated to 25 to 45° C. in advance. If the temperature of the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution is lower than the above range, dispersibility and dehydration efficiency are low, and dispersibility of the wet strengthening agent is low. If the temperature of the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution is higher than the above range, on the other hand, the raw material mixture and a mesh in step (c) are burdened. For these reasons, it is preferable for the temperature of the solvent to be within the above range.
[0056] The raw material mixture prepared in the above mixing ratio is stirred at a speed of 900 to 1100 RPM for about 15 to 25 minutes, whereby a raw material mixture slurry is obtained.
[0057] (c) The step of laminating the raw material mixture on a mesh belt is a step of laminating the slurry type raw material mixture prepared in the above mixing ratio on a mesh belt. Specifically, the raw material mixture is supplied to a mesh belt that moves at a speed of 10 to 20 m/min, and the amount of supply is preferably 2,500 L/min.
[0058] (d) The step of dehydrating the raw material mixture laminated on the mesh belt is a step of dehydrating the raw material mixture laminated on the mesh belt to primarily remove water from the aqueous wet strengthening agent solution.
[0059] At this time, dehydration is performed through a dehydration process of performing primary vacuum dehydration the moment the raw material mixture is laminated on the mesh belt to dehydrate the raw material mixture and additionally performing secondary vacuum dehydration.
[0060] In the primary vacuum dehydration process, vacuum pressure is applied through four steps. A vacuum pressure of 0 to 5 cmHg is applied in a first step, a vacuum pressure of 10 to 20 cmHg is applied in a second step, a vacuum pressure of 30 to 40 cmHg is applied in a third step, and a vacuum pressure of 50 to 65 cmHg is applied in a fourth step. Through the above dehydration process, binding between fibers is induced, and, as a result, non-woven fabric having porosity is formed.
[0061] In the secondary vacuum dehydration process, a vacuum pressure of about 18 to 22 cmHg is applied to remove residual moisture and at the same time to achieve denser binding between the fibers.
[0062] Finally, (e) the drying step, which is a step of completely removing residual moisture, is achieved by allowing the raw material mixture to sequentially pass through a hot-air dryer and a drum dryer. Specifically, primary drying in a hot-air dryer operated at 100 to 170° C., more preferably 110 to 130° C., secondary drying using hot air of 135 to 145° C., tertiary drying using hot air of 150 to 190° C., and quaternary drying in a drum dryer of 135 to 145° C. are sequentially performed.
[0063] If drying is performed at a high temperature in the initial stage of the drying step, drying is rapidly performed, whereby contraction or paper fracture occurs. If drying is performed at a low temperature in the initial stage of the drying step, on the other hand, complete binding of the binder fiber is not performed and the amount of residual moisture after winding is large, whereby negative influences, such as the occurrence of fluff or weakening of binding force, are exerted in a subsequent process. Consequently, it is preferable to perform drying under the four-step drying conditions from the primary drying to the quaternary drying.
[0064] Subsequently, a process of slitting the raw material mixture using a slitting machine and storing the slit raw material mixture may be further performed as needed.
[0065] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples and an experimental example. However, the following examples and experimental example merely illustrate the present invention, and the content of the present invention is not limited to the following examples and experimental example.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
[0066] 5 kg of an epoxidized polyamide resin, as a wet strengthening agent, was added to 10,000 L of water heated to 30° C. to prepare an aqueous wet strengthening agent solution. Subsequently, 15 kg of a PET fiber having an average diameter of 2 de and a length of 3 mm, 70 kg of a coniferous pulp having an average length of 2.3 mm, and 15 kg of a low melting polyethylene terephthalate having an average diameter of 2 de and a length of 5 to 7 mm (a melting point of 120° C., two kinds of polyethylene terephthalate are disposed in a sheath-core structure) were mixed in the prepared aqueous wet strengthening agent solution and were stirred for about 20 minutes to prepare a raw material mixture.
[0067] The prepared raw material mixture was laminated on a microfiber mesh belt. At this time, the feed rate of the mesh belt was 15 m/min, and the raw material mixture was uniformly supplied at 2,500 L/min.
[0068] In addition, the moment the raw material mixture was laminated on the mesh belt, first-step natural hydration was performed at a vacuum pressure of 0 cmHg, and then primary hydration was performed at a second-step vacuum pressure of 10 cmHg, a third-step vacuum pressure of 30 cmHg, and a fourth-step vacuum pressure of 50 cmHg.
[0069] After the primary hydration, secondary hydration was performed at a vacuum pressure of 20 cmHg.
[0070] Finally, primary drying in a hot-air dryer operated at 110 to 130° C., secondary drying at 135 to 145° C., tertiary drying at 150 to 190° C., and quaternary drying in a drum dryer of 135 to 145° C. were performed to remove residual moisture, whereby a sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured.
Example 2
[0071] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 60 kg of a coniferous pulp, 20 kg of a PET fiber, 20 kg of a binder fiber, and 3 kg of a wet strengthening agent were used in a raw material mixture.
Example 3
[0072] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 75 kg of a coniferous pulp, 10 kg of a PET fiber, and 3 kg of a wet strengthening agent were used in a raw material mixture.
Example 4
[0073] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 65 kg of a coniferous pulp, 20 kg of a binder fiber, and 1 kg of a wet strengthening agent were used in a raw material mixture.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES
Comparative Example 1
[0074] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 60 kg of a coniferous pulp, 35 kg of a PET fiber, and 5 kg of a binder fiber were used in a raw material mixture.
Comparative Example 2
[0075] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 30 kg of a coniferous pulp, 20 kg of a PET fiber, 20 kg of a glass fiber having an average diameter of 9 to 11 μm and a length of 3.0 to 6.0 mm, and 30 kg of a binder fiber were used in a raw material mixture without addition of a wet strengthening agent.
Comparative Example 3
[0076] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 70 kg of a coniferous pulp, 5 kg of a glass fiber having an average diameter of 9 to 11 μm and a length of 3.0 to 6.0 mm, and 25 kg of a binder fiber were used in a raw material mixture without addition of a PET fiber and a wet strengthening agent.
Comparative Example 4
[0077] A sample pad for diagnosis kits was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 50 kg of a coniferous pulp, 40 kg of a PET fiber, 10 kg of a binder fiber, and 3 kg of a wet strengthening agent were used in a raw material mixture.
Comparative Example 5
[0078] A sample pad for diagnosis kits manufactured by company A and currently for sale was used.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Wet Coni- strength- ferous PET Glass Binder ening Water pulp fiber fiber fiber agent Example 1 10,000 L 70 kg 15 kg — 15 kg 5 kg Example 2 10,000 L 60 kg 20 kg — 20 kg 3 kg Example 3 10,000 L 75 kg 10 kg — 15 kg 3 kg Example 4 10,000 L 65 kg 15 kg — 20 kg 1 kg Comparative 10,000 L 60 kg 35 kg — 5 kg 5 kg Example 1 Comparative 10,000 L 30 kg 20 kg 20 kg 30 kg — Example 2 Comparative 10,000 L 70 kg — 5 kg 25 kg — Example 3 Comparative 10,000 L 50 kg 40 kg — 10 kg 3 kg Example 4 Comparative — — — — — — Example 5 * Comparative Example 5 is a company A product for sale.
Experimental Example
[0079] Physical properties of the sample pads manufactured according to Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 were measured, and the results thereof are shown in Table 2.
[0080] For the wicking rate, a sample having a width of 2.5 cm and a length of 17 cm was vertically soaked in a sample solution by about 1 cm and time taken until the sample solution was absorbed by the sample to a point of 4 cm was measured according to AATCC Test Method 197-2012 (Vertical Wicking Test) Standards.
[0081] In the wicking test, the weight of a circular sample having a diameter of 2 inches was measured after being completely dried and the weight of the sample was measured after being soaked in the sample solution according to ASTM D57 Standards. Smoothness of the sample was observed with the naked eye.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Water Wicking rate absorption (s/4 cm) (mg/cm.sup.2) Smoothness Example 1 25 66 Good Example 2 24 63 Good Example 3 26 65 Good Example 4 28 62 Good Comparative 19 58 Bad Example 1 Comparative 42 48 Bad Example 2 Comparative 24 53 Good Example 3 Comparative 15 51 Bad Example 4 Comparative 86 38 Good Example 5
[0082] As summarized in Table 2, it can be seen that, for the sample pads manufactured using the manufacturing methods according to Examples 1 to 4 of the present invention, the wicking rates were 24 to 28 s/4 cm and water absorptions were 62 to 66 g/cm.sup.2, i.e. two parameters were excellent.
[0083] In contrast, for the sample pad manufactured using the manufacturing method according to Comparative Example 1, the wicking rate was too fast and the water absorption was low, since the content of the PET fiber was excessive while the content of the binder fiber was deficient.
[0084] For the sample pad according to Comparative Example 2, the content of relatively long fibers was high during the manufacturing process, since the content of the coniferous pulp was deficient while the content of the glass fiber and the content of the binder fiber were excessive, whereby the surface smoothness was not good, the wicking rate was too slow, and the water absorption was low.
[0085] For the sample pad according to Comparative Example 3, water absorption necessary to be used for diagnosis kits was not obtained, since the content of the PET fiber and the content of the wet strengthening agent were deficient while the content of the binder fiber was too high.
[0086] For the sample pad according to Comparative Example 4, the wicking rate and the water absorption deviate from appropriate ranges thereof, since the content of the PET fiber was excessive, and this sample pad was not appropriate as a sample pad for diagnosis kits, since the surface smoothness was bad.
[0087] Meanwhile, for the sample pad according to Comparative Example 5, which was a company A product for sale, the wicking rate was too slow, and the water absorption was very low.
[0088] The present invention has been described above based on the preferred embodiments thereof. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains will understand that the present invention can be implemented in modified forms without departing from intrinsic characteristics of the present invention. Therefore, the disclosed embodiments must be considered from an illustrative point of view, rather than a limited point of view. It should be interpreted that the scope of the present invention be defined by the appended claims, not by the above description, and the scope equivalent thereto be included in the present invention.