METHOD, COMPUTING UNIT, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DIAGNOSING THE FUNCTIONALITY OF A BURNER

Abstract

A method (200) for diagnosing the functionality of a burner (100), comprising: determining a lambda value (210) of an exhaust gas of the burner (100), comparing (220) the determined lambda value to a time-based changing lambda threshold (225), and detecting a malfunction (280) when the determined lambda value exceeds the time-based changing lambda threshold (225). Furthermore, a computing unit and a computer program for carrying out such a method (200) are proposed.

Claims

1. A method (200) for diagnosing the functionality of a burner (100) in an exhaust gas system of an internal-combustion engine (1) of a motor vehicle, the method comprising: determining a lambda value (210) of an exhaust gas of the burner (100), comparing (220) the determined lambda value to a time-based changing lambda threshold (225), and detecting a malfunction (280) when the determined lambda value exceeds the time-based changing lambda threshold (225).

2. The method (200) according to claim 1, wherein the time-based changing lambda threshold (225) decreases as a function of a time elapsed since an operational start of the burner (100).

3. The method (200) according to claim 1, further comprising: determining a temporal progression of a pressure difference in the burner (100) and a detection of a malfunction (280), when, within a first maximum start time from the operational start of the burner (100), an amplitude of a fluctuation in the progression does not exceed a first pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold value (250), and/or when, after a second maximum start time from the operational start of the burner (100), the amplitude of the fluctuation in the progression exceeds a second pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold (260), and/or when the amplitude of the fluctuation in the progression after the end of the first maximum start time from the operational start of the burner falls below a third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold value (270).

4. The method (200) according to claim 3, wherein the second maximum start time is longer than the first maximum start time and the second pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold (260) is less than the first pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold (250), and/or wherein the third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold (270) is less than the first (250), and/or wherein the third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold (270) is less than the second (260) pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold.

5. The method (200) according to claim 3, wherein the amplitude of the fluctuation in the progression is determined over an interval that is greater than a period duration of a fuel metering to the burner (100).

6. The method (200) according to claim 1, further comprising a performing a measure when a malfunction is detected (280).

7. The method (200) according to claim 6, wherein the measure comprises one or more of the group consisting of outputting an alert, restarting the burner (100), and shutting down the burner (100).

8. (canceled)

9. A system comprising: an exhaust gas system having a burner (100) and a lambda sensor downstream of the burner, and a computing unit configured to: determine a lambda value (210) of an exhaust gas of the burner (100), compare (220) the determined lambda value to a time-based changing lambda threshold (225), and detect a malfunction (280) when the determined lambda value exceeds the time-based changing lambda threshold (225).

10. (canceled)

11. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions executable by an electronic processor to perform a set of functions, the set of functions comprising: determining a lambda value (210) of an exhaust gas of the burner (100) in an exhaust gas system of an internal-combustion engine (1) of a motor vehicle, comparing (220) the determined lambda value to a time-based changing lambda threshold (225), and detecting a malfunction (280) when the determined lambda value exceeds the time-based changing lambda threshold (225)

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] Further advantages and configurations of the invention become apparent from the description and the accompanying drawing.

[0015] The invention is shown schematically in the drawing by means of an embodiment example and is described below with reference to the drawing.

[0016] FIG. 1 schematically shows a vehicle in which advantageous configurations of the invention can be applied.

[0017] FIG. 2 shows an exhaust gas burner, as can be used in the context of the present invention, in a schematic representation.

[0018] FIG. 3 shows an advantageous configuration of a method according to the invention in the form of a highly simplified block diagram.

[0019] FIG. 4 shows exemplary signal progressions as well as threshold values (progressions) as they can be observed or used in the context of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] In FIG. 1, a vehicle as can be used in the context of the invention is schematically shown and bears the overall reference number 10. In the example shown, the vehicle 10 comprises an internal-combustion engine 11, for example a stroke or rotary piston engine with external ignition, an exhaust gas system 12, which is adapted for aftertreatment of exhaust produced by the internal-combustion engine 11 and, for this purpose, for example, catalysts 122, 124 and soot particulate filters 126, an exhaust gas burner, for example, the exhaust gas burner 100 shown in FIG. 2, for heating at least a portion of the exhaust gas system 12, as well as a secondary air system 13, which is configured so as to supply air to the exhaust gas system 12 and/or the exhaust gas burner 100, in order to enable or promote oxidation reactions. A lambda sensor 102, for example a broadband lambda sensor, is provided downstream of the exhaust gas burner 100 to determine an oxygen content of the exhaust gas of the exhaust gas burner 100.

[0021] The secondary air system 13 herein includes an air filter 132, an air pump 134, a sensor 136, for example, a (differential or absolute) pressure and/or temperature sensor, and a secondary air valve 138, which can be provided, for example, in the form of a blocking valve, and can disrupt or permit the air supply 130 from secondary air system 13 to the exhaust gas burner 100 and the exhaust gas system 12.

[0022] It is understood that the components of the vehicle 10 described here need not necessarily be arranged in the order shown herein relative to one another. For example, the sensor 136 can also be located downstream of the valve 138 or upstream of the air pump 134, or the particulate filter 126 can be located upstream of the catalyst 124. Further, it can be advantageous to provide further components or to provide connections between the secondary air system 13 and the exhaust gas system 12 at other points. A differential pressure sensor can also be provided over the air pump 134 and/or over the secondary air valve 138 instead of, or in addition to, a pressure sensor 136.

[0023] In FIG. 2, a burner, for example an exhaust gas burner, with which a method according to the invention can be carried out, is shown schematically and bears the overall reference number 100. The exhaust gas burner 100 comprises a combustion chamber 110, an ignition system 120, here in the form of a spark plug that can be powered by, for example, an ignition coil, an air supply 130 that can be powered by, for example, a secondary air pump, and a fuel supply 140, here in the form of an injection system. Fuel introduced into the combustion chamber 110 during operation of the exhaust gas burner 100 along with introduced air is brought to reaction using the ignition system 120, wherein hot exhaust gases 150 are generated that are used in order to heat components arranged downstream of the exhaust gas burner of an exhaust gas system of an internal-combustion engine, such as catalysts, particulate filters, lambda sensors, or the like. A substantial feature of this design is the direct injection of fuel into the combustion chamber 110 and the associated interaction with the ignition system 120, wherein the invention is not limited to this design principle.

[0024] In FIG. 3, an advantageous configuration of the invention is shown in the form of a highly simplified block diagram and bears the overall reference number 200.

[0025] In FIG. 4, signal progressions, as can be observed in the context of the invention, as well as associated threshold values (progressions), as can be used in this context, are shown by way of example in a diagram over time t. In the diagram, an accumulated number of fuel meterings to the burner bears the reference number 390. Essentially, this corresponds to a straight line over time, which means (substantially) constant injection intervals, from whose zero value excess time point (injection start of the burner) the time distances to the signal evaluation are measured.

[0026] The method 200 determines an operating state of exhaust gas burner 100 based on operating parameters of the internal-combustion engine 11, the exhaust gas system 12, the exhaust gas burner 100, and/or the vehicle 10, whose wheels 15 are driven at least in part using the internal-combustion engine 11. In particular, a signal 325 from the lambda sensor 102 is used, from which it can be easily determined in particular when the burner 100 has a malfunction, i.e., does not ignite, for example, or demonstrates an unstable combustion of fuel.

[0027] As already explained above, in the absence of or incomplete combustion of the fuel supplied to the burner 100, a high oxygen content of the exhaust gas of the burner results, which results in a measured lambda value (sensor 102) that is, in particular permanently, too high. With the burner functioning, on the other hand, the lambda value 325 of the burner exhaust gas typically decreases over time to a target, such that a decreasing lambda value 325 indicates a functioning burner 100. This is taken into account in the method 200 such that a lambda threshold is implemented as a time-based changing lambda threshold 225. When the combustion is currently underway, the lambda value 325 of the burner exhaust gas is still so high that, in this phase of operation, a high lambda threshold 225 is acceptable, while as the operating life progresses, this still acceptable lambda threshold 225 is lowered in order to reliably detect malfunctions of the burner 100 without provoking false-positive results of the malfunction evaluation.

[0028] Specifically, in the method 200 as shown in FIG. 3, in a first step 210, the current lambda value 325 of the burner exhaust is determined. This is done in particular using the lambda sensor 102 shown in FIG. 1. An exemplary signal progression is, as already mentioned, bears the reference number 325 in FIG. 4.

[0029] In a comparison step 220, the resulting determined current lambda value 325 is compared with a threshold lambda value 225, which depends on a time elapsed since the operational start (injection start and ignition) of the burner 100. The currently valid lambda threshold 225 can be determined based on, for example, a time-dependent characteristic, a time-dependent computing instruction, or a reference table.

[0030] If, in step 220, it is determined that the current lambda value 325 of the exhaust exceeds the particular lambda threshold 225 and the exhaust gas of the burner thus contains more oxygen than acceptable, then the method 200 detects a malfunction of the burner 100 and proceeds to a step 280 in which a measure is performed, for example, an outputting of an alert.

[0031] If, on the other hand, in step 220, it is determined that the determined lambda value does not exceed the respective lambda threshold 225, then the method 200 proceeds to a step 230 in which an amplitude of fluctuations of a pressure signal 330 in the secondary air system 13, in particular a signal of the (differential pressure) sensor 136, is determined. In particular, the amplitude of the fluctuation is determined over an interval that is longer than a period duration of a fuel metering to the burner 100 in order to obtain valid, robust data.

[0032] Different pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold values 250, 260, 270 are provided for different time points. Depending on a time elapsed since the operational start of the burner 100, a step 240 is used in order to select which pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 250, 260, 270 is applicable. Depending on the pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold selected 250, 260, 270, the method proceeds to a respective comparison step 255, 265, 275 in which the amplitude determined in step 230 is compared to the relevant threshold.

[0033] Relatively shortly after the operational start of the burner, for example, within the first 0.1 s after the operational start, a high pressure fluctuation amplitude should be detectable by the flame formed in the burner 100, such that, in step 255, if a first pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold value 250 of, for example, 100 hPa is not achieved, it can be assumed that no ignition of the fuel supplied to the burner has occurred and thus a malfunction has been detected. In such a case, the method 200 proceeds to the measure step 280 already discussed. Conversely, if the pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 250 is reached or exceeded, a successful ignition can be assumed, and the method can return to step 210.

[0034] After an extended period of operation, typically after for example 0.2 s, a stabilization of the flame in the burner 100 is to be assumed when operating in accordance with the specification, whereby the pressure fluctuation amplitude should generally decrease and transition to a relatively stable pressure vibration. Thus, in step 265, the amplitude determined in step 230 can be compared to a second pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 260, which is in particular lower than the first pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 250. For example, the second pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold value 260 can be 50 hPa.

[0035] If the second pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 260 is exceeded, the flame can be assumed to be burning unstably, and the method can therefore proceed to step 280, because this is a malfunction.

[0036] If, on the other hand, step 265 determines that the pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 260 is met, the method can return to step 210 and continue monitoring.

[0037] If an ignition has already been detected in the method 200, it can be determined in the third amplitude comparison step 275 whether the flame has been extinguished again. For this purpose, a third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 270 is used, in particular lower than the first and second pressure fluctuation amplitude thresholds 250, 260. For example, the third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold can be 270 10 Pa or 10 hPa. If this third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 270 is undershot, then an extinguishing of the flame must be assumed, so that the method 200 can again proceed to step 280, while an excess of the third pressure fluctuation amplitude threshold 270 indicates the continued burning of a flame, such that the method 200 can return to step 210.

[0038] It should be emphasized that the threshold values specified here are to be understood purely by way of example and can be selected appropriately depending on the specific application, for example according to an empirical determination.

[0039] A method according to the present invention need not have all of the steps described herein in the order presented herein. For example, it is conceivable and, if appropriate, also advantageous to consolidate some of the steps and/or to perform them in a different order, for example, in reverse order. For example, it can be advantageous to perform the signal evaluation of steps 210 and 230 in a single step. This results on the one hand in a different number of steps and inevitably also in a different order of the steps. Similar modifications to the sequence of the method 200 are also possible with respect to other steps.