PROCESS FOR PARTIAL DELIGNIFICATION AND FILLING OF A LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL, AND COMPOSITE MATERIAL STRUCTURE ABLE TO BE OBTAINED BY THIS PROCESS
20220134596 · 2022-05-05
Inventors
Cpc classification
B27K2200/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B27K3/086
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B27K5/008
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B27K3/15
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C08H8/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B27K2240/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B27K3/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B27K3/15
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B27K5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C08B1/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The invention relates to a process for treating a lignocellulosic material, e.g., wood, comprising the following steps: providing a lignocellulosic material; removing at least some but less than all lignin from the lignocellulosic material to yield a delignified structure; and densifying the delignified structure to yield the delignified, densified material, wherein the delignified, densified material is equal in size or is smaller in size relative to the lignocellulosic material provided; where densifying may include contacting said delignified structure, at least in part, with at least one fluid at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. The invention also relates to a composite structure able to be obtained in this way, and to any part comprising at least one such structure.
Claims
1. A method for generating a delignified, densified material, comprising: (a) providing a lignocellulosic material; (b) removing at least some but less than all lignin from the lignocellulosic material to yield a delignified structure; and (c) densifying the delignified structure of (b) to yield the delignified, densified material, wherein the delignified, densified material is equal in size or is smaller in size relative to the lignocellulosic material provided in (a); and, wherein densifying in (c) comprises contacting said delignified structure, at least in part, with at least one fluid.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the delignified, densified material comprises a three-dimensional structure of cellulose and lignin, and wherein the three-dimensional structure comprises hydrogen bonds.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the delignified, densified material has increased resistance to an axial compression force than the lignocellulosic material in (a).
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing in (b) removes at least 40% by weight and at most 85% by weight of the lignin from the lignocellulosic material.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the removing in (b) comprises soaking the lignocellulosic material with at least one organic fluid.
6. The method of claim 6, wherein the at least one organic fluid comprises a polarity agent.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the lignocellulosic material is soaked for at least 6 hours.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the removing in (b) comprises soaking the lignocellulosic material with at least one aqueous fluid having an alkaline pH.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the soaking is performed under a vacuum.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the alkaline pH is about 12.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the at least one aqueous fluid comprises sodium hydroxide.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the at least one aqueous fluid comprises sodium sulfite.
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the soaking is performed for at least 30 minutes.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein the temperature of the at least one aqueous fluid exceeds 60° C.
15. The method of claim 8, wherein the removing in (b) further comprises washing the lignocellulosic material at least once with water.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the water has a temperature of at least 30° C.
17. The method of claim 8, wherein the removing in (b) further comprises washing the lignocellulosic material at least once with an organic solution.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the delignified structure in (b) has a water content of from 0% to 30%.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein the delignified structure in (b) or the delignified, densified material has improved fire resistance relative to the lignocellulosic material in (a).
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the delignified, densified material has a density at least 5% greater than that of the lignocellulosic material in (a).
21. The method of claim 1, wherein densifying comprises removing air from said delignified structure
22. A delignified, densified material, comprising: (a) cellulose; (b) hemicellulose; and (c) lignin; wherein the delignified, densified material is made from a natural wood; wherein at least 40% and at most 85% by weight of the lignin present in the natural wood is removed by a chemical treatment, wherein the delignified, densified material is equal in size or is smaller in size relative to the lignocellulosic material prior to chemical treatment.
23. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the delignified, densified material comprises a three-dimensional network of the cellulose and the lignin.
24. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the three-dimensional structure comprises hydrogen bonds.
25. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the delignified, densified material has a higher ductility than the natural wood.
26. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the delignified, densified material comprises hydrogen bonds.
27. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the lignin of the delignified, densified material is from 5.25% to 10.8% by weight of the delignified, densified material.
28. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the delignified, densified material has (i) a maximum stress at breaking and a bending deflection greater than the natural wood as determined by a bending measurement, or (ii) a maximum stress at breaking and deformation greater than the natural wood as determined by an axial compression measurement.
29. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the delignified, densified material is fire resistant.
30. The delignified, densified material of claim 22, wherein the delignified, densified material comprises essentially no air.
Description
DRAWINGS
[0246] The invention will be better understood in the light of the accompanying drawings in which:
[0247]
[0248]
[0249]
[0250]
[0251]
[0252]
[0253]
[0254]
[0255]
[0256]
[0257]
[0258]
[0259]
[0260]
[0261]
[0262]
[0263]
[0264]
[0265]
[0266]
[0267]
[0268]
[0269]
[0270]
[0271] In order, there can thus be distinguished a first step (1) which is a soaking step of the structure of lignocellulosic material. Step (1) performs partial extraction of the lignin of that structure. It is followed by a second step (2) which is a step of washing the structure resulting from step (1), to discharge the dissolved lignin resulting from step (1). This washing step (2) is followed by a third step (3) of filling the partially delignified structure resulting from the washing step (2), by at least one filling compound. The last and fourth step (4) is a step of fixation of the filling compound within the structure resulting from the filling step (3). This makes it possible to obtain a composite material structure formed by a three-dimensional network of transformed filling compound incorporated in a network of cellulose and lignin. This fourth step may be followed by a fifth step (5) of placing under pressure the structure resulting from the finishing step (4), possibly itself followed by a sixth step (6) of surface finishing of the structure (10) resulting from step (5).
[0272]
[0273]
[0274]
[0275] In this Figure, the assembly presented in
[0276] A pipe (22), which divides into a pipe (22a) and a pipe (22b), makes it possible, by means of respective valves (17) and (18), respectively to create a vacuum or introduce dinitrogen N2 into the chamber (25).
[0277] A pipe (23), which divides into a pipe (23a), a pipe (23b), a pipe (23c) and a pipe (23d), makes it possible, by means of respective valves (19), (20), (21) and (26), to discharge or introduce a respective solution (24a), (24b), (24c) or (24d) into the chamber. A pure solution (24a), (24b), (24c) or (24d), or possibly a mixture of at least two of these solutions (24a), (24b), (24c) and (24d), thus constitutes the treatment solution (11) (which may vary according to the step or sub-step of the process considered), in which bathes the wood structure (10). For the carrying out of the filling step (3), this makes it possible to perform a treatment of the wood structure (10) by series, each series comprising successive immersions for example in the order of use of the solutions. The treatment step (3) usually comprises several series, typically from 2 to 6 series, for example 4 series.
[0278] It is possible by way of variant to provide the device presented in
[0279]
[0280]
[0281] These cavities (28) are delimited by cell walls of average thickness of approximately 2 to approximately 10 μm for hardwoods and for softwoods.
[0282] As can be seen in
[0283]
[0284] The cell wall (49) can be distinguished, which is thinned relative to that represented in
[0285]
[0286] At the time of the partial delignification carried out by the soaking step (1) associated with the washing step (2), the primary wall (65) and the third sub-layer (54) of the adjoining secondary wall (60) have been the most delignified, themselves being the layers or sub-layers most charged in lignin, the third sub-layer (52) itself being very little charged with lignin, having practically not been delignified. This explains the differences in dimensional variations within the structure of the lignocellulosic material which occur on partial delignification according to the invention.
[0287] It is to be noted that, by adapting the dimensions indicated above,
[0288]
[0289]
[0290]
[0291] The invention will be better understood in view of the following example embodiments, with reference to the accompanying drawings.
EXAMPLES
[0292] The following examples illustrate the invention without however limiting the scope thereof.
Example 1
Process According to the Invention for Treating a Structure of Fir
[0293] A parallelepiped sample of fir wood of dimensions 0.5 cm×4 cm×8.5 cm (b×l×h) was subjected to the treatment process according to the invention, which, in the context of laboratory experiments, enabled a composite specimen to be obtained of dimensions 0.45 cm×3.6 cm×8.2 cm (b×l×h).
[0294] The chamber used was a vacuum oven (25).
[0295] Thus, the sample was treated during a first soaking step (1) by means of three identical successive sub-steps, each consisting of an immersion of the sample in a solution of 6% sodium chloride and 0.05% sodium hydroxide, under a vacuum, at a constant temperature of 70° C. for 5 hours.
[0296] The washing step (2) of the sample was next implemented, by immersion of the sample resulting from the preceding soaking step (1), by means of 4 identical successive sub-steps, each consisting of immersion of the sample resulting from the preceding step or sub-step in a solution of 99% ethanol, under a vacuum, at constant temperature of 60° C. for 4 hours, followed by 3 second identical successive sub-steps, each consisting of immersion of the sample resulting from the preceding sub-step in a solution of 99% hexane under a vacuum, at constant temperature of 50° C. for 3 hours.
[0297] The sample resulting from the washing step (2) was next left to rest, such that the hexane still present in the wood sample evaporates, for a period of 2 hours. The steps of filling (3) and finishing (4) of the sample so obtained were carried out by means of the device represented in
[0298] The filling step (3) was carried out according to the second embodiment, by impregnation under a vacuum. Thus, a “primary” monomeric solution was produced, composed of one part butyl methacrylate and three parts styrene, after purification of these compounds using a filtration powder made from diatomite. The primary monomeric solution was mixed for a first series, in a ratio of 50% by volume for 50% ethanol. The primary monomeric solution was mixed, in a ratio of 75% for 25% ethanol, for a second series. The primary monomeric solution (at 100%) constituted the solution of the third series. The primary monomeric solution (to 95%), added to 0.05 part catalyst (asoisobutyronitrile), constituted the solution of the fourth series.
[0299] The filling step (3) thus comprised four series, each series comprising four successive sub-steps, successively by the following solutions, made from solutions of fourth serious solution (monomeric solution+catalyst) (24a), ethanol (24b), hexane (24c) and monomeric solution (24d), without manipulation of the structure (10) and without contact with the air. The treatment of this step (3) was carried out under vacuum and at ambient temperature, for a duration of 24 hours per series.
[0300] At the end of the filling step (3), the solution (11) was evacuated by releasing the vacuum (17) and by blowing dinitrogen (18) to saturate the volume of the chamber (25), which advantageously prevented the evaporation of the monomers present in the structure (10).
[0301] The finishing step (4) which followed was a step of polymerizing the butyl methacrylate and styrene monomers filling the sample resulting from the filling step (3). This polymerization, leading to the formation of the styrene-butyl methacylate copolymer, was carried out under a vacuum, for a time of 20 to 24 hours for 500 mL of monomeric solution (11) at a temperature of 80° C. for the first two hours then 50° C. for the following part of the step.
[0302] This finishing step (4) was followed by a step of placing under pressure (5) which was carried out in the device of
[0303] The step of placing under pressure (5) was followed by a step of demolding the wood composite structure so obtained from the pocket, then surface finishing during a surface finishing step (6) using a light jet of ethyl acetate.
[0304] The composite fir sample so obtained was translucent.
[0305] It is also possible to provide a variant in which the chamber (25) is an autoclave (25), in which case a single series may be sufficient to perform the filling step (3), the finishing step (4) is carried out by immersion in a bath and the steps of placing under pressure (5) and surface finishing (6) then not being necessary. Example 1 was carried out several times, so as to obtain several composite fir samples which were evaluated in destructive mechanical tests and in non-destructive optical tests, as is explained in example 2 below.
Example 2
Evaluation of the Composite Fir Structure Resulting from the Treatment Process According to the Invention and Obtained in Example 1
[0306] The fir sample forming a composite fir structure obtained in Example 1 was evaluated not only for its properties of mechanical strength but also for its optical properties.
Mechanical Tests Illustrated by FIGS. 17 to 22
Bending Measurement Illustrated by FIGS. 17 and 18
[0307] This measurement was carried out on samples of fir of size 0.7 cm×2.5 cm×10 cm (b×l×h), according to a method developed by the applicant comprising three identical pulleys (39), of 3 cm diameter, applying bending to the structure. These three pulleys (39) were spaced pairwise by 3.5 cm, the distance between the furthest two pulleys (39) being 7 cm.
[0308]
[0309]
[0310] For the sample of natural (or native) fir (curve A), the maximum stress at breaking was measured at 175 kgf/cm.sup.2, and the bending deflection was 0.53 cm.
[0311] By contrast, for the translucent composite fir sample according to the invention (curve B), the maximum stress at breaking was measured at 350 kgf/cm.sup.2, and the bending deflection was 0.65 cm.
[0312] Thus, the cell densification of the fir by virtue of the treatment according to the invention enabled an increase of 200% in resistance to a bending force. Furthermore, in contrast to native fir, the breaking is more progressive in the case of the composite fir material according to the invention. Therefore, the material gained in ductility by virtue of the treatment according to the invention. Without wishing to be limited by any theory, the inventor thinks that this is probably due to a high adhesion between the fibers and the polymer matrix.
Axial Compression Measurement Illustrated by FIGS. 19 and 20
[0313] This measurement was carried out on samples of fir of dimensions 1 cm×3.5 cm×10 cm (b×l×h), according to a method developed by the applicant.
[0314]
[0315] As can be seen in
[0316]
[0317] For the sample of natural (or native) fir (curve A), the maximum stress at breaking was measured at 254 kgf/cm.sup.2, and the deformation just before breaking was 0.959 cm.
[0318] By contrast, for the translucent composite fir sample according to the invention (curve B), the maximum stress at breaking was measured at 430 kgf/cm.sup.2, and the deformation just before breaking was 0.978 cm.
[0319] Thus, the cell densification of the fir by virtue of the treatment according to the invention enabled an increase of 170% in resistance to an axial compression force. Furthermore, in contrast to native fir, the breaking is more progressive in the case of the composite fir material according to the invention. Without wishing to be limited by any theory, the inventor thinks that this is probably due to the nature of the composite fir, which leads to the occurrence of a fissure in the matrix being stopped by fibers of wood reinforced by the polymer.
Axial Traction Measurement Illustrated by FIGS. 21 and 22
[0320] This measurement was carried out on samples of fir of dimensions 0.2 cm×3 cm×7.5 cm (b×l×h), according to a method developed by the applicant.
[0321]
[0322] As can be seen in
[0323]
[0324] For the sample of natural (or native) fir (curve A), the maximum stress at breaking was measured at 125 kgf/cm.sup.2, and the extension just before breaking was 0.7 cm.
[0325] By contrast, for the translucent composite fir sample according to the invention (curve B), the maximum stress at breaking was measured at 165 kgf/cm.sup.2, and the extension just before breaking was 0.7 cm.
[0326] Thus, the plastic deformation recorded was approximately 6% before breaking.
[0327] The behavior of the material according to the invention in relation to axial traction is thus substantially identical to that of the material before treatment. Degradation of this value by use of the process according to the invention was not observed.
Optical Tests Illustrated by FIGS. 15, 16 and 23
[0328] The composite fir structure obtained in Example 1 was translucent.
[0329]
[0330]
[0331] The light-colored parts which fill after impregnation with the filling compound, are different once the impregnation has been carried out, in particular whiter and wider (see the comparison between parts 30 and 31 of
[0332] The dark parts (32 for the second photograph of
[0333]
[0334] The ambient light is 257 lux.
[0335] The first photograph is in the plane of a longitudinal radial cut (LRC) obtained with 14 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 5.5% light transmission), while the second photograph of this sample is in the plane of a transverse cut (TC) obtained with 27 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 11% light transmission).
[0336] These two photographs show that the composite wood is a structure in three dimensions, that is to say that whatever the cutting plane, the translucent character of the composite fir appears.
Example 3
Optical Evaluation of Composite Structures of White Pine, Pedunculate Oak, Mahogany, Tilia and Ash Resulting from a Treatment Process According to the Invention Obtained as in Example 1
[0337] The treatment process of Example 1 was reproduced on other kinds of wood, i.e. on samples forming composite structures of five kinds of wood: white pine, pedunculate oak, mahogany, tilia and ash. The optical properties of optical transmission of the samples of these five different kinds of woods were evaluated.
[0338]
[0339] The first photograph of the sample of white pine is in the plane of a longitudinal radial cut (LRC) obtained with 20 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 8% light transmission), while the second photograph of this sample is in the plane of a transverse cut (TC) obtained with 65 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 25% light transmission). The only photograph of the sample of pedunculate oak is the transverse cut (TC) obtained with 22 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 9% light transmission).
[0340] The only photograph of the sample of mahogany is the transverse cut (TC) obtained with 33 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 13% light transmission).
[0341] The first photograph of the sample of tilia is in the plane of a longitudinal radial cut (LRC) obtained with 30 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 12% light transmission), while the second photograph of this sample is in the plane of a transverse cut (TC) obtained with 70 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 30% light transmission).
[0342] The first photograph of the sample of ash is in the plane of a longitudinal radial cut (LRC) obtained with 11 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 4.3% light transmission), while the second photograph of this sample is in the plane of a transverse cut (TC) obtained with 33 lux of direct light transmission for the ambient light considered (i.e. 13% light transmission).
[0343] In each case, these photographs show that the composite wood is a structure in three dimensions, that is to say that whatever the cutting plane, the translucent character of the composite wood appears.
[0344] It would be possible to notably improve the light transmission of the composite wood considered by refinement of the process by the person skilled in the art, in particular with regard to the control of the delignification, the depth of saturation/filling and the nature of the filling compound of which the refractive index once transformed must be practically homogenous with the refractive index of the composite lignocellulosic substrate.