Photo bioreactor for cold pasteurization of liquid food products and the use of the reactor
11317637 · 2022-05-03
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01J19/0013
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2219/00051
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C12M37/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A23L2/50
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
B01J19/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A system capable of a germicidal treatment of highly opaque liquids, featuring a filter, which prevents wavelengths above the UV-C spectrum reaching the liquid being treated, one or more spiral-shaped tubes extending from an inlet end to an outlet end creating a fluidic pathway, and one or more light sources illuminating the one or more spiral-shaped tubes, wherein the one or more light sources emit light in a wavelength range between 180-300 nm.
Claims
1. A photo bioreactor for pasteurization of liquid food products, the photo bioreactor comprising: a. one or more spiral-shaped tubes extending from an inlet end to an outlet end creating a fluidic pathway; and b. one or more light sources illuminating the one or more spiral-shaped tubes, wherein the one or more light sources emit light in a wavelength range between 180-300 nm and light above a wavelength of 300 nm; wherein the photo bioreactor further comprises one or more filters positioned between the one or more light sources and the one or more spiral-shaped tubes, wherein the one or more filters prevent the light above a wavelength of 300 nm from reaching the one or more spiral-shaped tubes.
2. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein a fluid movement through the one or more spiral-shaped tubes creates a Dean Vortex flow, laminar flow, or turbulent flow.
3. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes have an inner tube diameter between 1 mm and 10 mm.
4. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes have a pitch between 2 and 8 mm wherein the pitch is the distance from center to center of the one or more spiral-shaped tubes after one turn/coil of the one or more spiral-shaped tubes.
5. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes have a coil angle between 1 and 6°, wherein the coil angle is measured between the one or more spiral-shaped tubes and a straight direction compared to the inlet end to the outlet end creating the fluidic pathway.
6. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes have a coil diameter between 20 and 150 mm, wherein the coil diameter is a distance from outer end to outer end of the one or more spiral-shaped tubes after a half turn/coil of the one or more spiral-shaped tubes.
7. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes are coiled around a pillar.
8. The photo bioreactor according to claim 7, wherein the pillar is made of a reflective material.
9. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes are made of a polymeric or quartz glass material being ultraviolet light transparent.
10. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the one or more light sources are coupled to one or more fibers guiding the 180-300 nm light from the one or more light sources to the one or more spiral-shaped tubes.
11. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, further comprising a reactor housing, wherein the one or more spiral-shaped tubes, the one or more light sources, and the one or more filters are enclosed inside the reactor housing.
12. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the photo bioreactor further comprises a cooler that air cools the one or more light sources.
13. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the photo bioreactor further comprises a control unit and the control unit comprises electronic temperature control and flow control.
14. The photo bioreactor according to claim 1, wherein the photo bioreactor further comprises a control unit and the control unit automatically controls a lamp temperature and a flow speed of a liquid through the fluidic pathway.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
(12) The
(13) The photo bioreactor further comprises a reactor housing 102a, 102b, 102c, which comprises three parts; a first part 102a positioned on the top of the photo bioreactor in
(14) A filter 112 positioned between outside the spiral-shaped tube 104 is also shown in
(15) The filter 112 is shown as see-through filter in
(16) The photo bioreactor shown in
(17) The
(18) In the embodiment in
(19) The two filters 112 are shown as see-through filters in
(20) The photo bioreactor shown in
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
EXAMPLES
(26) General Experimental Procedure
(27) The effects of tube diameter and flow rate were investigated using UHT whole milk spiked with Escherichia coli to a concentration of minimum 2.7E6 per millilitre (determined using the most probable number method).
(28) One litre UHT whole milk were transferred to a sterilized blue cap flask and added 1 ml of Escherichia coli media, achieving a desired minimum concentration of at least 2.7E6/ml. The spiked milk was circulated in the UV-reactor and samples were taken at intervals, when desired UV-C doses were achieved. The spiked milk was mixed constantly throughout the experiment using a magnetic stirrer.
(29) For each specific flowrate and tube size a new batch of 1 litre UHT whole milk spiked with Escherichia coli to a minimum concentration of 2.7E6/ml was prepared.
(30) The UV-reactor consisted of a FEP tube coiled around a 28 mm quartz glass. Within the quartz glass a 75 W germicidal lamp with a peak radiation at 253.7 nm was placed. The tested tube sizes were AWG (American wire gauge) 7, 9, and 11 and the flowrates investigated were 200, 300, 600 and 1000 ml per minute.
(31) The milk was circulated using a rotary vane pump and exposed in the UV-reactor for a period of time before samples of 20 ml were taken using sterilized pipettes and transferred to a sterilized blue cap flask. The milk was circulated in the system, with the lamp off prior to each experiment and a sample was taken to establish the start concentration. The milk temperature was 24 to 25° C. at the start of each experiment and 34 to 43° C. at the end of each experiment.
(32) After each experiment, the system went through a CIP (clean-in-place) procedure, first flushing the system using demineralised water for 10 minutes, followed by 40 minutes of circulating a 1% NaOH solution at 65° C. Followed by flushing the system for 10 minutes using demineralised water. After which a 0.5% HNO.sub.3 solution at 60° C. were circulated in the system for 40 minutes. Finally, the system was rinsed for 20 minutes using demineralised water.
(33) The samples were transferred to a sampling station in a laminar biosafety cabinet immediately after the experiment ended, where they were treated using the MPN method following Jarvis et al. [Jarvis, B. et al., Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2010, 109, 1660-1667].
(34) After two days in an incubator at 35° C. the number of positive test tubes was counted and the bacteria concentrations calculated.
Example 1
(35) Experimental example 1 investigates the amount of energy required from a pump and the light source to obtain inactivation or reduction of the biological contaminant. The tested tube size is AWG 9 and the flowrate investigated is 700 ml per minute.
(36) As can be seen in
Example 2
(37) Experimental example 2 investigates the difference in the current invention when varying the temperature from 18 degrees centigrade to 38 degrees centigrade. The tested tube size is AWG 9 and the flowrate investigated is 700 ml per minute. As shown in
Example 3
(38) Experimental example 3 investigates the current invention when varying the flow rate of the liquid at three different tube sizes. The tested tube sizes were AWG 7, 9, and 11 and the flowrates investigated were 200, 300, 600 and 1000 ml per minute.
(39) The temperature is kept between 24 and 43 degrees centigrade. As can be observed in
(40) Using a tube size of AWG 7 there is a small difference between flowrates. However, this difference is most predominant when analyzing at high energy exposure (around 4,000 J per liter liquid) where a 1-log.sub.10 difference is observed between flowrates of 200-300 ml/min versus flowrates of 600-1,000 ml/min.
(41) Using a tube size of AWG 9 there is a large difference between flowrates. This difference is largest when analyzing at high energy exposure (around 4,500 J per liter liquid) where a 3-log.sub.10 difference is observed between flowrates of 200-300 ml/min versus flowrates of 600-1,000 ml/min.
(42) Using a tube size of AWG 11 there is a very small difference between flowrates. However, this difference is negligible when analyzing at high energy exposure (around 4,000 J per liter liquid).
REFERENCES
(43) 102a First part of reactor housing 102b Second part of reactor housing 102c Third part of reactor housing 104 Spiral-shaped tubes 106 Inlet 108 Outlet 110 Pillar 112 Filter 114 Light source 116 Compressed length 118 extension/free length 120 Inner tube diameter 122 Pitch 124 Coil angle 126 Coil diameter 128 Outer tube diameter 130 Wall thickness