CHEMICAL REACTIONS
20220126261 · 2022-04-28
Inventors
- Carl Waterson (Ellesmere Port, GB)
- Richard David Hayton (Ellesmere Port, GB)
- Ian Malcolm McRobbie (Ellesmere Port, GB)
Cpc classification
B01J19/247
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2219/0245
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2219/0295
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A method of assembling an apparatus for containing reagents for a chemical reaction. The apparatus includes an elongate housing and a receptacle. The elongate housing may include a cooling means, and end fittings which may include ports where fluids may be introduced and/or removed. Specifically, the method relates to the securement of a receptacle relative to the outwardly facing surface of the housing.
Claims
1-25. (canceled)
26. A method of assembling apparatus for containing reagents for a chemical reaction, the method comprising: (i) selecting an elongate receptacle comprising a plastics material, said receptacle being arranged to define an internal volume for containing reagents, wherein said receptacle includes a first end and a second end which are spaced apart along the elongate extent of the receptacle, wherein said receptacle defines a mouth at said second end, wherein the diameter of said mouth is greater than the diameter of a region of said receptacle inwards of said second end; (ii) selecting a housing for containing the receptacle, wherein said housing includes a first end and a second end, wherein said second end of said housing includes an outwardly facing surface; (iii) with the receptacle within the housing such that the second end of the receptacle is adjacent the second end of the housing, positioning the second end of the receptacle over the outwardly facing surface; and (iv) securing the second end of the receptacle in position relative to the outwardly facing surface.
27. The method according to claim 26, wherein said receptacle comprises a plastics film material which has a thickness of at least 20 μm and a thickness of less than 2000 μm.
28. The method according to claim 26, wherein said first end of said receptacle is a closed end and includes a sealed region.
29. The method according to claim 26, wherein the length of the receptacle is the linear distance between its first end and its second end, wherein the diameter of the receptacle is substantially constant for at least 80% of the distance from the first end towards said second end of the receptacle.
30. The method according to claim 26, wherein the diameter of the receptacle is in the range lcm to 45 cm (and is preferably at least 7 cm and less than 30 cm) across its entire extent; and/or the length of the receptacle is in the range 15 cm to 60 m (and is preferably in the range 3 m to 15 m).
31. The method according to claim 26, wherein the maximum diameter of the mouth is up to 30% greater than the diameter of the receptacle inwards of the mouth.
32. The method according to claim 26, wherein other than any means by which the first end is arranged to define the closed end, the receptacle includes no seams between its first and second ends.
33. The method according to claim 26, wherein said receptacle is formed from lay-flat tubing.
34. The method according to claim 26, wherein the aspect ratio of the receptacle is defined as the length of the internal volume of the receptacle divided by the diameter of the internal volume of the receptacle, wherein said aspect ratio is at least 10 and is less than 600.
35. The method according to claim 26, wherein said housing is an elongate housing and is arranged to support the receptacle which is arranged within the housing, wherein the outwardly facing surface referred to in step (iii) of the method faces outwardly in a direction which is parallel to the elongate extent of the housing and/or is perpendicular to the diameter of the housing.
36. The method according to claim 26, wherein the housing includes a flange which defines the outwardly facing surface, wherein the flange includes a substantially planar face which extends substantially perpendicular to the elongate extent of the housing.
37. The method according to claim 26, wherein in step (iii) of the method, the receptacle is positioned within the housing, with the second end of the receptacle extending out of the housing, and said second end is then folded over the outwardly facing surface.
38. The method according to claim 26, wherein in step (iv) of the method, said receptacle is releasably secured in position within the housing by a securement means for clamping the receptacle in position and, optionally, said second end of said receptacle is secured in position by a surface of said securement means being urged against part of the receptacle (e.g. said mouth) so as to clamp the receptacle between the securement means and said outwardly facing surface (e.g. a flange) of the housing.
39. An apparatus assembled in the method of claim 26 wherein the apparatus comprises: (i) an elongate receptacle, wherein said receptacle includes a first end and a second end which are spaced apart along the elongate extent of the receptacle, wherein said receptacle defines a mouth at said second end, wherein the diameter of the mouth is greater than the diameter of a region of said receptacle inwards of said second end; (ii) a housing for containing the receptacle, wherein said housing includes a first end and a second end, wherein said second end of said housing includes an outwardly facing surface; (iii) wherein the second end of the receptacle is positioned over said outwardly facing surface of the housing; (iv) wherein the second end of the receptacle is secured in position relative to said outwardly facing surface.
40. A method of preparing an elongate receptacle for use in the method of claim 26, the method comprising: (a) selecting a precursor of a receptacle comprising a plastics material, said precursor of said receptacle being arranged to define an internal volume for containing reagents, wherein said precursor of said receptacle includes a first end and a second end which are spaced apart along the elongate extent of said precursor of said receptacle; (b) treating a region of the precursor of said receptacle adjacent said second end to define an opening of a receptacle for containing reagents, wherein said opening of said receptacle has a greater diameter than a region of the receptacle inwards of said second end.
41. The method according to claim 40, wherein said precursor is treated so that, adjacent the second end, the precursor diverges and the maximum diameter of the receptacle is situated at said second end.
42. The method according to claim 40, wherein in step (b), said precursor of said receptacle is heated to enable its shape to be changed, preferably substantially permanently and/or inelastically.
43. The method according to claim 40, wherein, in step (b), the precursor of said receptacle (e.g. a region thereof which includes said second end) is engaged with a former, for example a shaped object, which is arranged to facilitate formation of said divergent second end of the receptacle.
44. The method according to claim 43, wherein said former is conical or frusto-conical.
45. The method according to claim 43, wherein said former is positioned within the precursor of the receptacle and subjected to heat, optionally, to cause substantially permanent heat deformation of said precursor of said receptacle, thereby to define the receptacle described.
46. The method according to claim 43, wherein before or after step (b), the method comprises treating the precursor of said receptacle to close a first end of the receptacle, wherein, optionally, such treatment comprises heating a region of the precursor of said receptacle adjacent said first end.
47. The method according to claim 27, wherein: said first end of said receptacle is a closed end and includes a sealed region; the length of the receptacle is the linear distance between its first end and its second end, wherein the diameter of the receptacle is substantially constant for at least 90% of the distance from the first end towards said second end of the receptacle; the diameter of the receptacle is at least 7 cm and less than 30 cm across its entire extent; and/or the length of the receptacle is in the range 3 m to 15 m; the aspect ratio of the receptacle is defined as the length of the internal volume of the receptacle divided by the diameter of the internal volume of the receptacle, wherein said aspect ratio is at least 10 and is less than 600.
Description
[0079] Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
[0080]
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
[0084]
[0085]
[0086]
[0087]
[0088]
[0089]
[0090]
[0091]
[0092] In the Figures, the same or similar parts are annotated with the same reference numerals.
[0093] Referring to
[0094] Features of the apparatus and associated processes are described in greater detail below.
[0095]
[0096] The reaction tube 12 is formed from 125 μm (500 gauge) lay flat, polyethylene tube 26 which is initially not closed at either end The tube has a length of about 600 cm plus an additional 5 cm to 10 cm (to enable it to be clamped in position as described hereinafter) and a width of about 153 mm±5 mm when in its flattened state shown in
[0097] In a first step, shown in
[0098] In a second step, shown in
[0099] In a third step, shown in
[0100] The open end is splayed as aforesaid to facilitate securement of the open end within the apparatus in such a way as to minimise air gaps between the plastic reaction tube 12 and associated fittings of the apparatus. If air was to become trapped within folds of the plastic reaction tube 12, such air could be detrimental to the polymerisation process and/or reagents used therein. In addition, the splaying facilitates production of a fluid-tight seal between the plastic tube and fittings of the apparatus.
[0101] The apparatus 2 may be assembled as described with reference to
[0102] Referring to
[0103] Inner tube 38 may suitably be made from stainless steel (e.g. SS304L) of thickness 0.083″ (2.1 mm) and may have an outer diameter of 4″ (101.6 mm). The length may be 20 ft (609.6 cm). An inlet 13 (
[0104] At its left-hand end, as shown in
[0105] Outer tube 40 may suitably be made from stainless steel (e.g. SS304L) of thickness 0.12″ (3 mm) and may have an inner diameter of 108 mm and an outer diameter of 4.5″ (114.3 mm). The length may be 19 ft 7½″ (598.2 cm).
[0106] Coolant inlet 8 and outlet 10 may be fabricated with a 0.5″ NPT Weldolet (Trade Mark). A push fit adaptor may be used to allow easy connection or removal of tubing for coolant.
[0107] End fitting 16 may comprise a suitable gasket and a sanitary stainless steel end plate with a single tapped thread for the port 18.
[0108] At the left hand end of
[0109] Also as described hereinafter, during the process described inlet/outlet 22 may be used as an inert gas outlet during inflation of reaction tube 12, inerting and monomer/catalyst charging; and subsequently as an inlet for inert gas (to maintain a small positive pressure inside the reaction tube 12 for the remainder of the bulk polymerisation process).
[0110] Although in the figures the apparatus is shown with the elongate axes of tubes 38, 40 of the support tube assembly 4 horizontal, it is preferred that the tubes are raised at the left hand end of
[0111] The reaction tube 12, produced from tube 26 as described in
[0112] Next, as represented in
[0113] Note in
[0114] As will be noted from
[0115] After assembly of the apparatus as described with reference to
[0116] Referring to
[0117] Next, the tube 12 is inflated as shown in
[0118] The gas circulates within the tube 12 to inflate it and exits via port 22. During inflation of tube 12, inert gas supply via port 13 is stopped. Inflation of tube 12 can be verified by observing gas flow from port 18, resulting from displacement of a gas volume from outside tube 12 due to inflation of the tube 12. Once inflation of the tube 12 has been completed as shown in
[0119] As an alternative to the sequence of steps described with reference to
[0120] After completion of step 4(b), the apparatus is ready to be charged with reagents and polymerisation undertaken. Referring to
[0121] The monomer(s)/catalyst(s) mixture is suitably arranged to produce an ultra-high molecular weight polymer for use in drag reduction. The polymer may suitably be a polymer and/or copolymer of alpha-olefin(s).
[0122] Using the apparatus, polymer was prepared from 1-decene monomer, as described in Example 1.
EXAMPLE 1—PRODUCTION OF POLYMER
[0123] 1-decene monomer (31.6 kg) was purged with nitrogen for 60 minutes to remove dissolved oxygen which would otherwise be poisonous to the catalyst used. The monomer was passed through a pre-treatment column containing 1.5 kg of a 50:50 mixture of 13× and 5 Å molecular sieves (which had been pre-dried under vacuum at high temperature). Post the pre-treatment column, the monomer was pumped to a 90 litres stirred and jacketed glass lined reactor which had previously been dried and inerted to 0.3 vol % oxygen or lower.
[0124] The 1-decene was cooled to 5° C. and then 25 wt % diethylaluminium chloride (DEAC) (80.45 g) in heptane was transferred to a Swagelok (Trade Mark) bomb within a glove box. This was then added to the 1-decene under an inert atmosphere to scavenge any residual water or protic impurities. The mixture was then stirred for 20-30 minutes in a 90 litres reactor.
[0125] Inside a glovebox, titanium trichloride aluminium activated TiCl.sub.3(AAD) (3.7888 g), was dispersed with stirring into anhydrous heptane (157.6 ml), anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane (1.37 ml) and isobutylaluminoxane (IBAO) in heptane (3.5 wt % aluminium content in heptane) (41.4 ml) was added to the catalyst dispersion. The mixture was stirred, then transferred to a Swagelok bomb and subsequently transferred to the 90 litres reactor, whilst maintaining an inert atmosphere, to initiate the Ziegler Natta polymerisation.
[0126] It is found that, on mixing of monomer and catalyst, polymerisation is instantly initiated and thus proceeds rapidly. The mixture was then rapidly introduced using inert gas pressure to the inflated tube 12 via port 24 as described above with reference to
[0127] The reaction mixture was held within tube 12, as shown in
[0128] During the entire process, both the outside and inside of tube 12 were kept under approximately 0.5 psi nitrogen pressure by introducing nitrogen via ports 13 and 22 to assist in restricting oxygen ingress into the polymerising mixture.
[0129] At the end of the aforementioned 6 days reaction time, gasket 44 and end plate 46 were disengaged as shown in
[0130] The tube 12 (which is made from polyethylene as described) can readily be detached, for example cut and/or peeled away from the log of polymer 50, to thereby produce an isolated log 50 of polymer, as a single piece, as shown in
[0131] The log of polymer 50 of
[0132] Other procedures undertaken are described in Examples 2 to 7. Examples 2 to 6 describe procedures for assessing characteristics of polymers produced as described herein and results of such assessments.
EXAMPLE 2—DETERMINATION OF POLYMER CONVERSION PERCENTAGE IN A POLYMER PRODUCED
[0133] A disposable aluminium dish was weighed to four decimal places and the weight recorded (A). A sample of the test material (2-3 g) was placed in the dish and the combined weight of the dish and sample also weighed to four decimal places (B). The sample was dried in a vacuum oven (200° C., 0.04 Torr) for one hour, removed and reweighed. This process was repeated until constant weight (C) was achieved.
[0134] The polymer conversion percentage was calculated as follows:
% conversion=(C−A)/((B−A)*D)
where D is equivalent to the percentage purity of the commercial alpha-olefin monomer used/100. For example, D=0.994 for commercial 1-decene of purity 99.4%.
EXAMPLE 3—DETERMINATION OF PERCENTAGE DRAG REDUCTION OF POLYMER PRODUCED
[0135] Step 1—Preparation of Working Solution
[0136] n-Hexane (˜80 mL) was charged to a 250 mL bottle. A piece of the test polymer was sampled directly from the polymer log, as prepared in the bulk polymerisation reaction and accurately weighed to four decimal places (0.0150-0.0200 g). The polymer was then dissolved in the n-hexane by mixing for 2 days under low shear conditions, to provide a solution (A).
[0137] Solution (A) was then transferred to a clean, preweighed 500 mL bottle and accurately topped up with further n-hexane to provide a final polymer concentration of 100 mg/kg (100 ppm w/w). The sample was manually mixed, avoiding vigorous shaking, providing partially diluted solution (B).
[0138] An aliquot of solution (B) (4 g) was accurately weighed into a clean, preweighed 1000 mL bottle, then accurately topped up with further n-hexane to the target sample weight (400 g). The sample was manually mixed as above to provide working solution (C) 1 mg/kg (1 ppm w/w).
[0139] Step 2—Drag Reduction Testing Procedure
[0140] Clean, preweighed collection bottles (1000 mL) were used for collection of liquids during the test runs.
[0141] The test apparatus consisted of a 2 litre pressure vessel, fitted with charging inlet for solvent, bottom run off (used for cleaning purposes at the end of experiments), and a dip leg connected to a length of stainless steel tubing external to the vessel (7 feet length, 6.35 mm OD, 0.89 mm wall thickness). The tubing was fitted with a control valve at the outlet. The pressure vessel was further fitted with an inert gas inlet, connected to a supply line via a precision pressure control valve. This was set at a constant pressure (2.6 psi) for all experiments.
[0142] The vessel was charged with ˜400 g of either working solution (C) as prepared in Step 1, or untreated n-hexane (control sample), then sealed and pressurised with inert gas (2.6 psi) with the outlet control valve closed. This valve was then opened allowing liquid to purge the external tubing, then closed (this liquid was discarded). A preweighed collection bottle (1000 mL) was placed at the outlet, then the valve reopened for 12-13 seconds to allow the liquid to flow again, recording the elapsed time using a stopwatch. The remaining liquid in the vessel was then discarded, rinsing the vessel thoroughly with untreated n-hexane (for test cycles where solution (C) was used).
[0143] The percentage flow improvement (% FI) and percentage drag reduction (% DR) were calculated from the hexane blank flow rate (F0) and the treated sample (solution (C)) flow rate (Fa) as follows:
F0 in g/sec=(collected weight in g)/(time valve was opened in seconds)
Fa in g/sec=(collected weight in g)/(time valve was opened in seconds)
then
% FI=100*(Fa−F0)/F0
% DR=[(1+% FI).sup.1.9−1]/(1+% FI).sup.1.9
EXAMPLES 4 TO 6—PRODUCTION OF POLYMERS USING DIFFERENT CATALYST AMOUNTS
[0144] Three separate bulk polymerisation reactions (Examples 4 to 6 respectively) were carried out using the apparatus described above, with 1-decene as the monomer. The synthesis procedure was identical to that described in Example 1 other than modification of the charges of TiCl.sub.3(AAD), 1,2-dichloroethane, isobutylaluminoxane solution and heptane diluent, to provide different levels of catalyst loading (expressed as ppm w/w of Ti relative to the monomer charge weight). After completion of the bulk polymerisation the reaction tube comprising the polymer was removed according to the procedure above, and the polymer sampled for analysis, as described in Examples 2 and 3.
[0145] For each of the polymer products, polymer conversion percentages were determined for 10 samples, taken from different points within the polymer log. These points were selected to provide information on the consistency of polymerisation along both the long axis and the cross sectional diameter of the polymer log.
[0146] For each of the polymer products, percentage drag reduction (% DR) was determined as described in Example 3 for four samples taken from different points within the polymer log. These points were selected to provide information on the consistency of product performance characteristics along the long axis of the polymer log.
[0147] The results of these experiments are shown in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 % polymer conversion % drag reduction Example Catalyst Standard Standard No. (ppm w/w Ti) Average deviation Average deviation 4 120 87 1 50.49 1.61 5 100 87 1 49.60 0.81 6 80 83 1 51.62 0.68
[0148] The results show that, when bulk polymerisations were carried out using the apparatus described, products with excellent performance characteristics were obtained. The data shows that polymerisation could be successfully achieved using the apparatus, across a range of catalyst concentrations typical for this application. Furthermore, for each individual experiment the data showed excellent consistency in both chemical composition and performance characteristics, throughout the polymerised reaction volume.
EXAMPLES 7 TO 9—PRODUCTION OF COPOLYMERS
[0149] Three separate bulk polymerisation reactions (Examples 7 to 9 respectively) were carried out using the apparatus described above, with a monomer mixture of 1-hexene and 1-decene. The synthesis procedure was identical to that described in Example 1 (120 ppm w/w of Ti relative to the monomer charge weight) other than the selection of monomers. After completion of the bulk polymerisation the reaction tube 12 comprising the polymer was removed according to the procedure above, and the polymer sampled for analysis, as described in Examples 2 and 3.
[0150] Polymer conversion percentages and percentage drag reduction (% DR) measurements, from multiple points within the polymer log, were taken and reported in identical manner to Examples 4 to 6.
[0151] The results of these experiments are shown in Table 2.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 % polymer conversion % drag reduction Example 1-hexene 1-decene Standard Standard No. wt % mol % wt % mol % Average deviation Average deviation 7 60.0 71.4 40.0 28.6 87 1 51.92 0.67 8 35.7 48.0 64.3 52.0 88 3 50.90 0.68 9 28.6 40.0 71.4 60.0 89 3 51.66 0.35
[0152] The results show that, when bulk polymerisations were carried out using the apparatus described to make copolymers, products with excellent performance characteristics were also obtained. Similarly to Examples 4 to 6, the data showed excellent consistency in both chemical composition and performance characteristics, throughout the polymerised reaction volume.
[0153] An alternative, simplified, apparatus 110 is shown in
[0154] Although only one apparatus 2, 110 has been described, an assembly may be provided including multiple apparatuses 2, 110 to manufacture larger amounts of polymer. Such reactors could be filled sequentially or simultaneously, optionally through the use of a manifold system.
[0155] In another embodiment, shown in
[0156] The invention is not restricted to the details of the foregoing embodiment(s). The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.