TESTING OF LIFEBOAT SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
20230249019 · 2023-08-10
Inventors
Cpc classification
B63C9/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
A62C37/50
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for testing a lifeboat sprinkler system without launching the lifeboat. A tank (5) of freshwater is arranged adjacent the lifeboat (1) on a marine vessel or oil platform (2). A line (24) is connected from the tank (5) to the sprinkler system of the lifeboat (1). The pressure of the water supply is arranged by means of the location of the tank (5) and/or a regulating valve (23) to mimic the pressure of the seawater that the system would access from an inlet (14) in the lifeboat hull (15) if it were launched.
Claims
1. A process for testing a sprinkler system of at least one lifeboat on an offshore installation or a seagoing vessel without launching the lifeboat, wherein the sprinkler system comprises a pump and an inlet, the inlet being located below a normal waterline of the lifeboat; wherein the process is characterized by: a) providing a freshwater supply on the installation or vessel, the supply being located adjacent the lifeboat on the installation or vessel; b) connecting the freshwater supply to the sprinkler system of the lifeboat; c) switching on the lifeboat pump to draw freshwater through the sprinkler system.
2. The process according to claim 1, including the step of controlling, by a valve or other means, the static pressure of freshwater at an inlet of the lifeboat pump.
3. The process according to claim 2, wherein the static pressure of freshwater at the pump inlet in the testing process is substantially equal to the static pressure of seawater at the pump inlet if the lifeboat were floating on the sea.
4. The process according to claim 2, wherein the static pressure at the pump inlet is adjusted to compensate for differences in density and/or viscosity of freshwater and seawater.
5. The process according to claim 1 wherein the lifeboat has a propulsion engine for propulsion of the lifeboat and, during the testing process, the pump is driven from the propulsion engine.
6. A lifeboat sprinkler testing system for use on an offshore installation or a seagoing vessel, the system comprising: a) at least one lifeboat located on the installation or vessel, the lifeboat including a sprinkler system comprising a pump and an inlet, the inlet being located below a normal waterline of the lifeboat; characterized by: b) a tank of freshwater located adjacent the lifeboat on the installation or vessel; c) wherein the height of the tank location relative to the inlet of the lifeboat sprinkler system provides a static pressure of freshwater at least equivalent to the static pressure of seawater at the inlet if the lifeboat were floating on the sea; d) a conduit and connector for connecting the tank to the lifeboat sprinkler system to allow freshwater to pass from the tank into the lifeboat sprinkler system when the pump is turned on.
7. The system according to claim 6, further comprising a valve for regulating the static pressure of freshwater at an inlet of the pump such that the pressure is substantially equivalent to the static pressure of seawater at the pump inlet if the lifeboat were floating on the sea.
8. The system according to claim 7, further comprising a valve for regulating the static pressure of freshwater at the pump inlet to take into account differences in viscosity and/or density of seawater and freshwater.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] A more complete understanding of the present invention and benefits thereof may be acquired by referring to the follow description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
[0018]
[0019]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0020] Turning now to the detailed description of the preferred arrangement or arrangements of the present invention, it should be understood that the inventive features and concepts may be manifested in other arrangements and that the scope of the invention is not limited to the embodiments described or illustrated. The scope of the invention is intended only to be limited by the scope of the claims that follow.
[0021]
[0022] An outlet valve 8 from the tank 5 may be opened to allow freshwater to flow through a line 9 to feed water into one or more lifeboat sprinkler systems, indicated generally at 10 in
[0023] A lifeboat sprinkler system is shown schematically in
[0024] In the system according to the invention, the sprinkler system may be modified to receive a freshwater supply for the purposes of testing. Although this is not essential, since water could theoretically be supplied directly to the inlet 14 in the hull 15 of the lifeboat, the system is preferably modified to accept the test water at a junction 19 in the line 17. The line 17 may be severed and a section 20 of line, e.g. rigid pipe, may be inserted into the line 17 by means of connectors 21. The junction 19 is incorporated into the new section 20 and a freshwater inlet line 22 and valve 23 connected to the junction 19. The valve 23 may allow the freshwater inlet line 22 to be closed completely or may be operable to control the static pressure of freshwater in the line 22. Valve 23 is critical and needs to have a procedural fail safe mechanism. The reason for this is that if a test is done with this new system incorporated and the operator forgets to close the valve then the boat may either sink or the sprinkler system will not work since line 22 is open.
[0025] When a sprinkler test is to be performed, a line 24 from the freshwater tank is connected to the inlet line 22. As shown, a connector 25 is incorporated into the valve arrangement 23 on the downstream side of the valve, but of course the valve could be part of the sprinkler system in the lifeboat 1 or part of the installation on the platform 2. In a test, the valve 16 is shut off to prevent water flowing out of the normal seawater inlet and the valves 8 and 23 are opened so that freshwater flow to the sprinkler system. The lifeboat pump 13 is operated and water is thereby pumped under pressure to the sprinkler nozzles 11 as it would be during normal operation.
[0026] The static head of the water fed to the pump may be controlled by the location of the tank 5 above the lifeboat 1, by adjusting (either manually or by some automated system) the valve 8 on the tank outlet or the valve 23 at the inlet to the sprinkler system, or by any or all of these things.
[0027] The line 24 may be permanently connected to the lifeboat and the connector 25 may be a quick release connector, such that the lifeboat could be launched in an emergency and the connection to the freshwater supply automatically broken. More normally, the freshwater supply would be connected to the sprinkler system only when a test was being performed.
[0028] A permanent modification by installing T-piece may impact the certification of the lifeboat as a whole, so an alternative procedure may be simply to disconnect the inlet line to the pump and connect the temporary line from the freshwater tank during the test, disconnect it after the test and assemble the system back to the solution given in the certification of the boat. In this case, the system and method would be identical to that described above except that the connectors 21 and joint 19 would be omitted from the arrangement shown in
[0029] It will be apparent to the skilled reader that the testing of a lifeboat sprinkler system as described above will take very little time since it involves simply the operation of one or two valves. In contrast, previous methods of testing involved launching the lifeboat with at least one crew member on board to activate the sprinkler system and monitor its function, and then retrieving the lifeboat and crew member. The retrieval operation may take many hours not to mention the wear and tear on the lifeboat from repeated launches. In addition, the use of seawater for tests presents additional risk of corrosion of the pipework, valves and pump of the sprinkler system.
[0030] In closing, it should be noted that the discussion of any reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication date after the priority date of this application. At the same time, each and every claim below is hereby incorporated into this detailed description or specification as a additional embodiments of the present invention.
[0031] Although the systems and processes described herein have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims. Those skilled in the art may be able to study the preferred embodiments and identify other ways to practice the invention that are not exactly as described herein. It is the intent of the inventors that variations and equivalents of the invention are within the scope of the claims while the description, abstract and drawings are not to be used to limit the scope of the invention. The invention is specifically intended to be as broad as the claims below and their equivalents.