Batch oil shale pyrolysis
11312911 · 2022-04-26
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A cascading reactor system configured for recovering kerogen oil from rubblized oil shale by cycling each reactor through at least a preheating phase, a peak heating phase, a cooling phase, and a recharging phase by the differential and sequential direction of fluid through each reactor and, wherein the system is modularly scalable.
Claims
1. A method for recovering hydrocarbons from shale, comprising: operating a plurality of reactors in a batch mode, wherein the reactors are configured for steam hydrolysis; charging each reactor with shale particles; cycling each reactor through phases, wherein the phases comprise: a preheating phase; a peak heating phase; a cooling phase; a recharge phase comprising removing spent shale particles from the reactor after the cooling phase and recharging the reactor with shale particles that have not undergone a peak heating phase and a cooling phase, wherein the spent shale particles are shale particles that have completed the peak heating phase and the cooling phase; wherein the preheating phase comprises preheating the shale particles with vapor phase effluent produced during the peak heating phase; wherein the peak heating phase comprises heating the shale particles from about 400° F. to about 900° F. using superheated steam, wherein the peak heating phase is configured to produce the vapor phase effluent, wherein the vapor phase effluent is configured to provide heat for the preheating phase; wherein the cooling phase comprises cooling the shale particles that have completed the peak heating phase to recover heat energy from the spent shale particles, thereby cooling the spent shale particles before they are discharged from the reactor; operating all of the plurality of reactors concurrently, such that no reactor of the plurality is in the same operating phase simultaneously; introducing, from a production facility, superheated steam, with a temperature ranging from about 750° F. to 900° F., into a first reactor filled with shale particles that have been preheated to a temperature of about 400° F.; heating the shale particles in the first reactor with the superheated steam to thermally crack kerogen within the shale particles, and vaporize liquid hydrocarbons that result from cracking of the kerogen, and vaporize water that is present in the shale particles, thereby producing the vapor phase effluent, wherein the vapor phase effluent comprises water vapor and hydrocarbon vapor; recovering heat energy remaining in the vapor phase effluent produced in the first reactor upon completion of the first reactor's peak heating phase by transferring the heat energy from the vapor phase effluent in the first reactor to a second reactor that is operating in the preheating phase, wherein a temperature in the second reactor is less than the first reactor; condensing the vapor phase effluent and producing a supply of fresh water in the second reactor; and after completing the peak heating phase of the first reactor and without an intervening phase in the first reactor: cooling the spent shale particles in the first reactor by injecting water condensed from the vapor phase effluent into the first reactor, thereby producing steam by vaporizing the water contacting the spent shale particles, in the first reactor; recovering the steam from the first reactor; heating, in the production facility, the steam recovered from the first reactor to a temperature ranging from about 750° F. to about 900° F. to provide regenerated superheated steam for the peak heating phase; injecting the regenerated superheated steam into a reactor that is operating in the peak heating phase; and replenishing water, due to a production of the superheated steam, in the production facility with the supply of fresh water.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein cycling each reactor comprises injecting water, steam, or both to heat the shale particles therein during a first portion of the cycling, and injecting water, steam, or both to cool the shale particles therein during a second portion of the cycling.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein cycling each reactor comprises injecting a portion of the hydrocarbons produced from at least one reactor into at least one other reactor during the at least one other reactor's preheating phase.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein injecting a portion of the hydrocarbons comprises injecting high-temperature hydrocarbon vapors produced from at least one reactor into at least one other reactor; wherein the hydrocarbon vapors cool and condense therein.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the condensed hydrocarbons are utilized to remove particle fines entrained in a production stream.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein cycling each reactor comprises injecting high temperature heating and cooling fluids at the base of each reactor to prevent agglomeration of the shale particles; wherein preventing agglomeration of the shale particles includes limiting the overburden weight of the shale on individual shale particles.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein cycling each reactor in the cooling phases comprises reducing the temperature of the shale particles below about 200° F.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein cycling each reactor in the recharge phase comprises removing the shale particles from each reactor by directing the shale particles through a chute into a solids handling device.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein transferring the heat energy to at least a second reactor operating in the preheating phase comprises establishing a thermal cascade.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein establishing a thermal cascade further comprises providing thermal communication between steam, water, and effluent from each reactor.
11. A method for recovering kerogen oil comprising: loading a first reactor with rubblized shale; loading a second reactor with rubblized shale; heating the rubblized shale in the first reactor during a peak heating phase to a maximum temperature for the rubblized shale in the first reactor during the method with superheated steam sourced from a production facility, to thermally crack kerogen within the rubblized shale, and vaporize liquid hydrocarbons that result from cracking of the kerogen, and vaporize water that is present in the shale particles, thereby producing a vapor phase effluent, wherein the vapor phase effluent comprises water vapor and hydrocarbon vapor, wherein the superheated steam has a temperature ranging from about 750° F. to about 900° F.; recovering heat energy from the vapor phase effluent produced in the first reactor; transferring the heat energy recovered from the vapor phase effluent in the first reactor to the second reactor; condensing the vapor phase effluent and producing a supply of fresh water in the second reactor; collecting condensate from the second reactor, wherein the condensate comprises condensed vapor phase effluent, wherein the condensed vapor phase effluent comprises condensed water and condensed hydrocarbons; heating the rubblized shale in the second reactor to a second peak heating temperature by injecting water, steam, or both into the second reactor at a location adjacent the bottom of the second reactor, wherein the second peak heating temperature is the maximum temperature for the rubblized shale in the second reactor during the method; cooling the first reactor during a cooling phase, by injecting the condensed water from the condensate into the first reactor, thereby producing steam by vaporizing the condensed water contacting spent shale, in the first reactor, wherein the spent shale is shale that has completed the peak heating phase and the cooling phase; recovering the steam from the first reactor; heating, in the production facility, the steam recovered from the first reactor to a temperature ranging from about 750° F. to about 900° F. to produce regenerated superheated steam for the peak heating phase; injecting the regenerated superheated steam into a reactor undergoing a peak heating phase; wherein heating the first reactor to a first peak heating temperature comprises injecting the steam to create a pressure drop between the bottom of each reactor and the top of each reactor that is equivalent to an overburden weight of overlying rubblized shale when operating at a higher temperature; recovering kerogen oil from the collected condensate; and replenishing water, due to a production of the superheated steam, in the production facility with the supply of fresh water.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising operating a plurality of first and second reactors arranged in a thermal cascade.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein heating the first reactor to the first peak temperature comprises heating the first reactor to a temperature between about 750° F. and about 900° F.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein heating the second reactor to the preheating temperature with the hydrocarbon vapor from the first reactor, further comprises heating the second reactor to a temperature greater than about 400° F.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein heating the second reactor to the second peak temperature comprises heating the second reactor to a temperature between about 750° F. and about 900° F.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the shale particles are heated to a maximum temperature achieved during the method during the peak heating stage.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein cooling the first reactor during the cooling phase occurs after heating the rubblized shale in the first reactor during the peak heating phase, without an intervening phase in the first reactor.
18. A method for recovering hydrocarbons from shale, comprising: loading shale particles into a first reactor and a second reactor; injecting superheated steam into the first reactor to heat the shale particles in the first reactor to a peak temperature for the shale particles in the first reactor during the method; producing a vaporized effluent within the first reactor during the injecting; flowing the vaporized effluent to the second reactor; heating the shale particles in the second reactor with the vaporized effluent during the flowing; cooling the shale particles in the first reactor immediately after the injecting; and removing the shale particles from the first reactor after the cooling.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein: cooling the shale particles in the first reactor comprises flowing saturated steam through the first reactor; and the method comprises flowing steam from the first reactor to the second reactor after flowing the steam through the first reactor.
20. The method of claim 18, comprising: injecting superheated steam into the second reactor after injecting the superheated steam into the first reactor, wherein injecting the superheated steam into the second reactor comprises heating the shale particles in the second reactor to a peak temperature for the shale particles in the second reactor during the method; cooling the shale particles in the second reactor immediately after injecting superheated steam into the second reactor; and removing the shale particles from the second reactor after cooling the shale particles in the second reactor.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) For a detailed description of the disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
NOTATION AND NOMENCLATURE
(5) In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ”.
(6) Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection of the two devices, or through an indirect connection as accomplished via other intermediate devices, apparatuses, and connections.
(7) The term “vessel” is used herein to refer to containers used for heating or cooling shale particles. As found herein, the term “kettle” may be used interchangeably with the term “vessel”. Further, “kettle” is intended to more specifically refer to a vessel configured for batch processing a finite quantity of shale. Still further, “retort” is used herein to refer to a vessel configured for high-temperature pyrolysis.
(8) “Rubblization” refers to the fragmentation of rock by mechanical means to achieve smaller sized particles. Further, the term “rubblized” refers to material that has been mechanically fragmented to smaller sized particles.
(9) “Aqueous pyrolysis” or “hydrous pyrolysis” refers to the thermal decomposition of organic compounds brought about at high temperature in the presence of water, which exists either in the form of liquid water or vapor/steam.
(10) As found herein “hydrocarbon species” refers to the numerous hydrocarbon compounds of differing physical properties which have been generated by pyrolysis reactions.
(11) The term “saturated steam” refers to steam that is in equilibrium with heated water at the same pressure.
(12) Further, the term “superheated steam” refers to steam that is elevated in temperature above its saturation temperature.
(13) As used herein “lean gas” or “lean hydrocarbon species” refers to low molecular weight hydrocarbon species remaining in the gas phase after high molecular weight hydrocarbon species have been condensed.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(14) Overview:
(15) The system and method to be described is focused on a design for a mechanically simple technology to enable a rapid ramp up in kerogen oil production volumes such that scale efficiencies may be realized. In a departure from the typical continuous processing retorts that underpin many oil shale technologies, a form of batch processing using aqueous (hydrous) pyrolysis is being advocated. While this is a batch process, multiple batches are undertaken in assembly line or sequential fashion to produce a near continuous production rate of a refinable kerogen oil product.
(16) Certain properties arise from the use of aqueous pyrolysis. As a heat transfer medium, steam and/or water may be used to both heat and cool batches of shale rapidly through direct or indirect means. Further, the use of an aqueous medium provides a highly efficient means for recovering heat and transferring it between batches of shale. Additionally, pyrolysis undertaken in the presence of water appears to be beneficial in improving kerogen oil yield, approaching or exceeding the yield derived by the Fischer Assay method. Without limitation by theory, this may be due to the incorporation of exogenous hydrogen into various the hydrocarbon species and this hydrogen can only be sourced from the water in contact with the shale during pyrolysis. Further, as disclosed herein by elevating the temperature of kerogen rich shale to the thermal window between about 300° F. and about 1000° F., a virtually complete pyrolysis of the shale will occur to create man-made kerogen oil.
(17) The embodiments disclosed herein are designed and operated to be as a simple batch design. Multiple reactors are contemplated, each operating in a different heating or cooling phase. The temperature differences that exist between the reactors, creates the opportunity to achieve high thermal efficiency by transferring heat from a hotter reactor(s) to a cooler reactor(s). As disclosed herein, an aqueous fluid is used as the primary heating medium, thus permitting the extraction of kerogen oil from organic rich oil shale rock obtained from either a surface or subsurface mining operation, in a mechanically simple system.
(18) Method:
(19) In general, rubblization enhances the surface area of the shale available for heat transfer, while also yielding a particle size distribution which preserves highly permeable flow paths for injected aqueous fluid contacting the shale particles. The process comprises heating of oil shale rubble by an aqueous fluid to temperatures necessary for the conversion of the solid kerogen into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon species via aqueous pyrolysis; as used herein the molecular cracking in the presence of water, primarily in the thermal window from about 300° F. to about 1000° F.; alternatively from about 350° F. to about 950° F.; and still further from about 400° F. to about 900° F. The peak temperature and temperature range to be applied may be dependent upon the properties of particular shale used, and other design considerations in an economically optimal process installation. Heating is achieved by direct injection of aqueous fluid, water or steam, into a heavily insulated fixed bed reactor, such as a kettle or retort, which has been charged with rubblized oil shale particles. In certain instances the rubblized shale is dimensionally less than about 6 inches in any one dimension; alternatively less than about 5 inches and in certain instances, less than about 3 inches in any one dimension. In still further instances, the rubblized shale may be dimensionally less than about an inch in any dimension.
(20)
(21) The reactor 110 includes a cap 160 configured to fluidly connect fluid conduits 170 to the reactor contents 101. In configurations, the cap 160 is coupled to a plurality of fluid conduits 170 configured to entrain and convey fluids, including vapors, gases and liquids from the reactor 110. In further configurations, certain fluid conduits 170 in the cap 160 provide a fluid flow into the reactor 110, for example in direct contact with the reactor contents 101. Further, it may be understood that cap 160 is pivotable or removable to permit solids depositing into reactor 110 in order to form and/maintain reactor contents 101. Still further, cap 160 may comprise a hatch or other sealable passage therethrough for the same purpose.
(22) Without limitation by theory, the injector 150 injects steam or superheated gases into the reactor 110 via the chute 140 and the perforated distributor plate 130. In some configurations the injector 150 is configured to inject any fluid into the chute 140 and the reactor 110. The steam or vapor from fluid travels vertically through the reactor contents 101 to contact cap 160. Cap 160 directs gases into fluid conduits 170 for direction to other reactors for additionally processing or distillation to form reactor products. Further, cap 160 directs fluids from fluid conduits 170 into the reactor contents. Generally, reactor products may be considered refinable hydrocarbons, in certain instances may comprise hydrocarbon liquids, and more specifically kerogen oils as discussed herein.
(23) During what is referred to herein as the “peak heating phase” or “peak heating period” heat transfer from the aqueous fluid to the shale rubble occurs in the thermal window from about from about 300° F. to about 1000° F.; alternatively from about 350° F. to about 950° F.; and still further from about 400° F. to about 900° F. as illustrated in
(24) The reactor is charged with shale rubble so as to have a void space from about 10% to about 50%; further from about 18% to about 45%; and alternatively, from about 25% to about 40%. The void space is at least partially dependent upon particle size distribution of the shale rubble introduced into a reactor and is a design consideration which may vary between particular projects. As may be understood, particle size will affect the rate of heat transfer as well as the permeability of the rubblized shale bed, thus the flow rates that can be achieved through the bed.
(25) Referring now to
(26) After reaching a target temperature beyond which negligible hydrocarbon expulsion is achieved, for example between about 700° F. and about 900° F., or as may be determined for particular shale type, the peak heating phase for a reactor 100 is terminated. The reactor of now spent shale then undergoes a cooling phase. As used herein, during the “cooling phase” or the “cooling period,” the spent shale is cooled by the same process used to heat the shale. Initial cooling of the spent shale reactor is achieved by injecting low grade steam into the base of the kettle. The steam initially exiting the spent shale reactor will be approximately the same temperature as the spent shale, declining to a temperature approaching that of the injected low grade steam as more steam is injected. The exiting steam may then be returned to a production facility where the heat energy may be recovered and reused.
(27) An objective of the cooling phase is to reduce the temperature of the spent shale to enable its safe handling or safe solids transport when the reactor is emptied (e.g. via chute in
(28) Shown in
(29) In another configuration illustrated in
(30) The pre-heating phases in Reactors B, C, and D are also intended to vaporize native free water content in the pore space of the shale, as well as any clay bound water present in rock fabric. When a reactor is preheated above about 200° F. or about the boiling point of water, the free and clay bound water may be separated and vaporized, and the water vapor may be then condensed in pre-heating reactors B, C, D with temperatures below about 200° F. or about the boiling point of water. The pre-heating phase reactors B, C, D therefore creates a fresh water supply in order to partially, if not completely, replenish the loss of water in downstream process facilities.
(31) The cooling loop 320 in this example is accomplished by injecting saturated steam, water, or both into the base of Reactor F via the saturated stream line 390. As Reactor F had already undergone its peak heating phase prior to the commencement of the Peak Heating Phase for Reactor A, in order to facilitate emptying the reactor, the temperature of the reactor must be reduced. Thus it is possible to recover at least a portion of the substantial heat energy remaining in the spent shale and permit safe handling of the spent shale when the reactor is later emptied. The steam, water, or both injected into Reactor F may initially exit at an elevated temperature approaching that of the spent shale and then rapidly decline as heat is removed from Reactor F, eventually approaching the temperature of the injected steam, water, or both. It may be understood that use of water to quench a reactor may accelerate cooling due to the large amount of heat absorbed as required to vaporize the introduced water.
(32) One element of the process is the injection of heating and cooling fluids at the base of base of hot reactors during both the peak heating phase Reactor A and cooling phase Reactor F. Without bottom injection, the shale particles, which are much softer at higher temperatures and may be devoid of their original kerogen content, would compact or compress in response to the weight of the shale thereinabove. Compaction would restrict flows paths for the injected fluids and reduce the rate at which heating and cooling fluids may be injected. The orientation of the fluid injection also may produce a pressure drop from the base to the top of the reactor to offset the weight of the overlying shale material. Thus, in a reactor as configured and described herein, the shale particles may be at least partially fluid-supported such that individual particles do not fully bear the weight of overlying shale particles. When operated in an expanded bed or fluidized bed modes achievable at higher gas phase velocity, the overburden weight of the particles would be reduced significantly, if not eliminated as particles are suspended in fluid. Bottom injection with a pressure drop equivalent to the overburden weight of the overlying shale bed may prevent agglomeration of the shale particles and make the heat transfer herein possible. Once cooled, these particles at least partially regain rigidity/strength to resist compaction.
(33) While the block flow diagram of
(34) Without limitation by theory, a simple process design provides a means of lowering capital costs and presents significant opportunity to achieve high thermal efficiency by recovering heat otherwise lost. More specifically, it may be understood that the present system and method are configured such that the reactors, facilities and materials handling equipment and components may be of a largely uniform design, readily fabricated, kept in inventory, and deployable in a modular system. Still further, by limiting temperature and pressure operating envelope of the reactors, the use of lower cost carbon steel is made possible in order to further reduce capital costs.
(35) As disclosed hereinabove, the uncondensed hydrocarbons, hydrogen and other gases evolved from the pyrolysis reactions may provide significantly more fuel than needed to meet the heating and other energy needs of a larger system, project, or development according to this disclosure. Higher kerogen oil yield, for example that may exceed Fischer Assay, may be possible using aqueous/steam pyrolysis. Specifically, during the peak heating phase (e.g. in Reactor A), the rapid flow of steam through the void space between the shale particles should provide sufficient sweeping action to rapidly vaporize liquid hydrocarbons from the surface of shale particles to improve kerogen oil yield, therefrom. In the absence of this sweeping action, these liquids are subject to further cracking and deposition of increased amounts of unrecovered carbon (i.e. coke) on the shale or within the reactors themselves.
(36) By limiting peak heating temperature of the shale rubble, the production of a higher yield (as compared with Fischer Assay) and higher API gravity oil content may be possible as compared with higher temperature combustion driven pyrolysis. By limiting peak heating temperature of the shale rubble to below about 900° F., the risk of decomposing carbonate constituents in the oil shale is likewise reduced. Still further, recognizing that heavy metals are often bound up in carbonates, the risk of releasing these contaminates is reduced according to the present method. The likelihood of fines entrained in the oil produced by the embodiments described herein will be reduced by comparison with ash introducing combustion processes. The condensing of produced oil in the gravel bed of a pre-heating reactor may also assist in the removal of particulate matter from the produced oil.
(37) Additionally, although water is an integral part of the process by virtue of significant use in heating and cooling, the process recycles all the water used in a sealed system of vessels and pipe work. As excess fresh water may be produced from the shale, it may be possible for the process to be a net water producer in certain commercial applications and depending upon the water content of particular oil shales. The reported water content of oil shale deposits varies across the map, from about 1% to in excess of about 20% by weight (wt %). Utilizing an estimated water content ranging from about 2 wt % to about 5 wt % for most or average shale deposits, a significant excess supply of water is potentially generated by the process.
(38) Still further, the present disclosure is configurable such that peak heat and cooling phases are operable in a matter of a few hours or few minutes. As may be understood, this duration may be at least partially dependent upon the scale of the installation being designed. The speed at which a spent reactor can be emptied and recharged may ultimately govern the production rate achievable by a single train of reactors. Standard engineering practices will operationally and economically optimize the production rate achievable by installations of varying size.
(39) Depending upon the number of reactors used in a train and the number of trains used, a near constant production rate may be achieved. In a non-limiting example, as the production from a reactor declines when the hydrocarbon content of the shale charge is spent or recovered and its peak heating phase terminates, the production rate will be replenished by a subsequent peak heating phase reactor in a single train development scheme, for instance as demonstrated in
(40) At least one embodiment is disclosed and variations, combinations, and/or modifications of the embodiment(s) and/or features of the embodiment(s) made by a person having ordinary skill in the art are within the scope of the disclosure. Alternative embodiments that result from combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of the embodiment(s) are also within the scope of the disclosure. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations (e.g., from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4, etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). For example, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, R.sub.l, and an upper limit, R.sub.u, is disclosed, any number falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within the range are specifically disclosed: R=R.sub.l+k*(R.sub.u−R.sub.l), wherein k is a variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percent increment, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 5 percent, . . . 50 percent, 51 percent, 52 percent . . . 95 percent, 96 percent, 97 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent. Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in the above is also specifically disclosed. Use of broader terms such as “comprises”, “includes”, and “having” should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as “consisting of”, “consisting essentially of”, and “comprised substantially of”. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above but is defined by the claims that follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated as further disclosure into the specification, and the claims are embodiment(s) of the present invention. The discussion of a reference in the disclosure is not an admission that it is prior art, especially any reference that has a publication date after the priority date of this application. The disclosure of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited in the disclosure are hereby incorporated by reference, to the extent that they provide exemplary, procedural or other details supplementary to the disclosure.
(41) To further illustrate various exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the following examples are provided.
EXAMPLES
(42) The following Example is meant to be illustrative and not-limiting to the overall disclosure of the system and method disclosed herein. In instances, the following Example 1, comprises illustrative calculations of the method and system:
(43) TABLE-US-00001 Volume of Shale in a Reactor & Amount Recoverable Reactor dimensions: Height of vessel 40 ft Radius of vessel 10 ft Volume of vessel 12560 ft.sup.3 Void Volume in vessel 0.4 particle space est. Shale Volume in vessel 7536 ft.sup.3 Density Sh 2.3 gm/cc Density Sh 143.5 bl/ft.sup.3 WT. shale in vessel 1081079.8 lb WT. shale in vessel 540.5 ton Fischer Assay Yield 25 ga/tonLab derived est. (UT, WO) Vol oil produced 13513.5 gal Vol oil produced 321.7 bbl Heat Requirements for pyrolysis Shale Heat Capacity 0.25 BTU/lb-F BTU heat 1 lb shale from 50° F. to 175 BTU 750° F. BTU heat 1 ton shale from 50° F. 350000 BTU to 750° F. BTU to heat shale volume in kettle 189188968.6 BTU 50° F. to 750° F. MMBTU to heat shale volume in 189.2 MMBTU 50° F. to 750° F. kettle Heating requirement of peak 81.1 MMBTU 400° F. to 700° F. heating vessel Energy Content of Oil Shale Energy content of 1 ton oil shale 5.34 MMBTU/ton Energy content of shale in abovevessel 2886.5 MMBTU Heating Energy Applied/Energy 6.55% H.sub.2; C1-C4, thermal energy. Content of Shale Poss. H.sub.2 gas to upgrade oil Darcy Law Flow Rate of Steam (through peak heating vessel) Height of vessel 40 ft Crossectional area for flow (Pi × r{circumflex over ( )}2) 314.2 ft.sup.2 Pressure drop across vessel (1 psi × height) 40 psi Steam viscocity 0.0244 cp Avg. ~750° F.; ~200 psi Gravel Permeability 100 Darcy Resulting Flow Rate Q(CFD) 8148596.72 ft.sup.3/day Resulting Flow rate Q (MMCFD) 8.15 MMCFD Density of steam 0.329 lb/ft.sup.3 Avg. ~700° F.; ~200 psi Weight of steam circulated at above rate 2680888.3 lb/day Weight of steam/weight of shale 2.48 ratio/day Enthalpy of steam at inlet 1476.59 BTU/lb ~900° F.; ~200 psi Enthalpy of steam at outlet 1374.58 BTU/lb ~700° F.; ~170 psi Heat loss of steam (perfect heat transfer) 102.01 BTU/lb ~900° F.-~700° F.) Rate of BTU transfer (perfect heat transfer) 273477417.7 BTU/day MMBTU 273.48 MMBTU/day MMBTU required to heat shale (peak heating 81.1 MMBTU kettle) Days to heat shale 0.30 Days Hours to heat shale in vessel 7 Hrs ~400° F.-~700° F. Economics Daily oil production rate from single-train facility of above 1085.2 barrels dimensions Annual Production rate from single train facility of above 396108 barrels dimensions Revenue @ $80/bbl $31.69 MM 10 train facility Daily oil production rate from single-train facility of above 10852 barrels dimensions Annual Production rate from single train facility of above 3961082 barrels dimensions Revenue @ $80/bbl $316.9 MM Operating Costs Mining, materials handling & transport $20 bbl O&M $10 bbl Misc $5 bbl Total $35 Capital Cost All in cost $200 MM Oil Transport Cost $15.0 bbl Oil Price (inc. discount for kerorgen) $75
(44) Further, the Economics of operating a plant according to the disclosure herein may be shown herein in Example 2:
(45) TABLE-US-00002 20 Yr Totals Production Rate (BOPD)* 10852.sup. BOPD Production Rate (MMBO pa) 79.22 MMBO Oil Price $75 flat Revenue $ mm $5,941.6 mm Capital Cost - $ mm $200.0 mm Operating Cost - $ mm $2,772.8 mm Oil Transport $1188.3 mm Pre-tax CF $1980.5 mm Discount factor (10%) Discounted CF $843.1 mm Undiscounted CF IRR 49% NPV0 1780.541 ROI 8.90 Discounted CF @ 10% Discount Rate NPV10 643.1 DROI 3.22