Fishway effect evaluation method based on stable isotope method

Abstract

Disclosed in the present invention is a fishway effect evaluation method based on stable isotope method, belonging to the technical field of fishway effect evaluation. The fishway effect evaluation method according to the present invention comprises stable isotope ratio determination, trophic niche estimation and effectiveness evaluation on fishway construction. The evaluation method according to the present invention is used for researching one or more migratory fishes in the upstream and downstream of the water conservancy projects, determining and quantitatively explaining whether the influence of the water conservancy projects on one or more migratory fishes is eliminated or not from the perspective of the ecosystem through comparison and analysis of stable isotopes, and has the characteristics of high detection speed, stable result and the like.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a fishway effect based on stable isotope ratio, consisting of the following steps: (i) determining stable isotope ratio: sampling a dominant migratory fish in an upstream reservoir and in a downstream river of a fishway construction project, determining a .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio of the dominant migratory fish in the upstream reservoir and a .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio of the dominant migratory fish in the downstream river and a .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio of the dominant migratory fish in the upstream reservoir and a .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio of the dominant migratory fish in the downstream river, comparing the .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio in the upstream reservoir, the .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio in the downstream river, the .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio in the upstream reservoir, and the .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio in the downstream river with a predetermined .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio of a common and stable object in the upstream reservoir, a predetermined .sup.13C/.sup.12C of a common and stable object in the downstream river, a predetermined .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio of the common and stable object in the upstream reservoir, and a predetermined .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio of the common and stable object in the downstream river, and calculating a carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value in the upstream reservoir, a carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value in the downstream river, a nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value in the upstream reservoir, and a nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value in the downstream river; (ii) estimating trophic niche: calculating an area TAU that represents a trophic niche of a population of the dominant migratory fish in the upstream reservoir using the carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value in the upstream reservoir and the nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value in the upstream reservoir; calculating an area TAD that represents a trophic niche of a population of the dominant migratory fish in the downstream river using the carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value in the downstream river and the nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value in the downstream river; calculating an area OA that represents a trophic niche of an overlap population of the dominant migratory fish in the upstream and in the downstream river using the area TAU and the area TAD; (iii) evaluating the effectiveness of the fishway construction project: when the area OA is equal or greater than 60% of the area TAD, the fishway construction project is considered to be successful; when the area OA is less than 60% of the area TAD and equal or greater than 30% of the area TAD, the fishway construction project is considered to be effective; when the area OA is less than 30% of the area TAD and equal or greater than 10% of the area TAD, the fishway construction project is considered to be satisfactory; and when the area OA is less than 10% of the area TAD, the fishway construction project is considered to be failed, wherein sampling the dominant migratory fish includes obtaining at least 30 dominant migratory fish as samples, and does not include sampling any other fish.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step (i), sampling the dominant migratory fish in the upstream reservoir and in the downstream river includes performing sampling at least three sample sites in the upstream reservoir and at least three sample sites in the downstream river and performing sample at a time according to a migration physiological pattern of the dominant migratory fish.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein determining the .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio and the .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio includes: accurately weighting and taking quantitative samples of the dominant migratory fish to be tested, packaging the samples using a tin can, and using elementary analyzer-stable isotope mass spectrograph to perform on line determination of the .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio and the .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein calculating the carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value and the nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value includes: calculating the carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value using formula (1): $\begin{array}{cc}{\delta }^{13}C\left(\%o\right)=\left(\frac{{}^{13}C{/}^{12}{C}_{\mathrm{sample}}}{{}^{13}C{/}^{12}{C}_{\mathrm{VPDB}}}-1\right)\times 1000,& \left(1\right)\end{array}$  wherein .sup.13C/.sup.12C.sub.sample is the .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio in the upstream reservoir and the .sup.13C/.sup.12C ratio in the downstream river, .sup.13C/.sup.12C.sub.VPDB is a carbon isotope ratio of an international standard object VPDB, and an error rate of δ.sup.13C‰ is less than 0.2‰; calculating the nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value using formula (2): $\begin{array}{cc}{\delta }^{15}N\left(\%o\right)=\left(\frac{{}^{15}N{/}^{14}{N}_{\mathrm{sample}}}{{}^{15}N{/}^{14}{N}_{\mathrm{air}}}-1\right)\times 1000,& \left(2\right)\end{array}$  wherein .sup.15N/.sup.14N.sub.sample is the .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio in the upstream reservoir and the .sup.15N/.sup.14N ratio in the downstream river, .sup.15N/.sup.14N.sub.air is a nitrogen isotope ratio in a standard atmosphere, and an error rate of δ.sup.15N is less than 0.3‰; and using an SPSS16.0 one-way ANOVA method to identify and remove the carbon stable isotope ratio δ.sup.13C value and the nitrogen stable isotope ratio δ.sup.15N value that have significant difference.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a trophic niche diagram of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix in the upstream and downstream of a certain fishway A in Xiang River;

(2) FIG. 2 is a trophic niche diagram of Mylopharyngodon piceus in the upstream and downstream of a certain fishway B in Han River;

(3) FIG. 3 is a trophic niche diagram of Aristichthys nobilis in the upstream and downstream of a certain fishway C in Xiang River;

(4) FIG. 4 is a trophic niche diagram of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix in the upstream and downstream of a certain fishway D in Dadu River;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(5) The terms used in the present invention have generally the meanings that are commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, unless otherwise specified.

(6) The present invention is described in further detail below with reference to specific examples and data. The following examples are intended to illustrate the invention, but not to limit the scope of the invention in any way.

Example 1

(7) Fishway Effect Evaluation Method Based on Stable Isotope Method

(8) The method comprises the following steps:

(9) (i) Selecting the Sampling Area

(10) taking the upstream reservoir and the downstream river of the fishway construction project as the sampling area, there are at least three sampling sites in each sampling area when performing sampling according to the areas of the reservoir and the river;

(11) (ii) Selecting the Sampling Species

(12) according to the historical data and the local research result of the fishway watershed, selecting typical domain migratory fishes in the sampling area for sampling and research work;

(13) (iii) Selecting the Sampling Time

(14) selecting the sampling time according to the migratory psychological needs of the fishes, for example, spawning migratory fishes selecting the spawning seasons for sampling, feeding migratory fishes selecting the time when they need to forage a lot for sampling, and overwintering migratory fishes selecting the season when they migrate to proper temperature for sampling;

(15) (iv) Sampling and Screening

(16) selecting sampling tools according to different living environments of fishes, wherein the fishes at the middle and upper layers can be collected using a drift net, the fishes at the lower layer can be sampled using a bottom trawl net or a ground cage net, and 30 tails of the samples with quick action, high body color and luster and complete fin stretching and unfolding are randomly selected from the collected samples and are frozen and stored at −20° C.;

(17) (v) Sample Treatment

(18) removing fish skin, taking back muscle, drying in an oven at 60° C. for 48 h until reaching a constant weight, taking out, grinding into fine powder, and storing in a drier to obtain a fish sample to be tested.

(19) (vi) Stable Isotope Ratio Determination

(20) accurately weighting and taking quantitative samples to be tested, packaging the samples using 4×6 tin can, and using elementary analyzer-stable isotope mass spectrograph (Flash EA 1112 HT-Delta V Advantages, Thermo Company) to perform on line determination to the .sup.13C ratio (.sup.13C/.sup.12C) and the .sup.15N ratio (.sup.15N/.sup.14N) in the samples to be tested in the fishes, calculating the stable isotope ratio (δ.sup.13C) and the nitrogen stable isotope ratio (δ.sup.15N) according to the formula.

(21) the carbon stable isotope ratio being represented as δ.sup.13C, and the calculation formula being as below:

(22) $\begin{array}{cc}{\delta }^{13}C\left(\%o\right)=\left(\frac{{}^{13}C{/}^{12}{C}_{\mathrm{sample}}}{{}^{13}C{/}^{12}{C}_{\mathrm{VPDB}}}-1\right)\times 1000;& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

(23) in formula (1), .sup.13C/.sup.12C.sub.sample denoting the actual carbon isotope ratio, .sup.13C/.sup.12C.sub.VPDB denoting the carbon isotope ratio of the international standard object VPDB; and the error rate of δ.sup.13C‰ being less than 0.2‰;

(24) the nitrogen stable isotope ratio being represented as δ.sup.15N, and the calculation formula being as below:

(25) $\begin{array}{cc}{\delta }^{15}N\left(\%o\right)=\left(\frac{{}^{15}N{/}^{14}{N}_{\mathrm{sample}}}{{}^{15}N{/}^{14}{N}_{\mathrm{air}}}-1\right)\times 1000;& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

(26) in formula (2), .sup.15N/.sup.14N.sub.sample denoting the actual nitrogen isotope ratio, .sup.15N/.sup.14N.sub.air denoting the nitrogen isotope ratio of the standard atmosphere; and the error rate of δ.sup.15N being less than 0.3‰;

(27) using SPSS16.0 one-way ANOVA to verify whether the screened out δ.sup.13C value and δ.sup.15N value in the fish samples have significant difference and to remove the data having significant difference.

(28) (vii) Trophic Niche Estimation

(29) using the determined δ.sup.13C value and δ.sup.15N as horizontal and vertical coordinates to establish a coordinate system; in the coordinate system, δ.sup.13C Value Variational Range (CR) represents the feeding range of this fish, δ.sup.15N Value Variational Range (NR) represents the trophic level range of this fish;

(30) drawing a two-dimensional scatter set formed by δ.sup.13C value and δ.sup.15N value of fishes collected by an upstream reservoir into a coordinate system, and calculating a Total Area (TA) of convex deformation surrounded by solid connecting lines of scatters on the outermost edge, wherein the area represents the trophic niche of the fish population in the upstream reservoir, which is represented by TAU; drawing the δ.sup.13C value and δ.sup.15N value of the fish collected from the downstream river by the same method to form the trophic niche of the fish population in the downstream river, which is expressed by TAD; and

(31) calculating the trophic niche Overlap Area, which is represented by OA, of the fish population in the upstream of the reservoir and the downstream of the river; using ArcMap 10.1 to calculate OA, generating an area map according to all the introduced coordinate point data, and calculating the numerical value of the area, generating an overlap area and calculating the numerical value of the area by cross function.

(32) (viii) Effectiveness Evaluation on Fishway Construction

(33) when the coincidence degree of TAU and TAD exceeds 60% of TAD, namely when OA≥60% TAD, this indicates that a very significant number of fishes successfully migrate from a downstream river to an upstream reservoir via a fishway, the construction effect of the fishway is considered to be excellent, and the influence of water conservancy projects on migration of the fishes is basically eliminated;

(34) when the coincidence degree of TAU and TAD is 30-60% of TAD, namely when 60% TAD>OA≥30% TAD, this indicates that a significant number of the fishes successfully migrate from a downstream river to an upstream reservoir via a fishway, the construction effect of the fishway is considered to be good, and the influence of water conservation projects on the migration of the fishes is mostly eliminated;

(35) when the coincidence degree of TAU and TAD is 10-30% of TAD, namely 30% TAD>OA≥10% TAD, this indicates that a certain amount of fishes successfully migrate to an upstream reservoir from a downstream river through a fishway, the construction effect of the fishway is qualified, and the influence of water conservancy projects on the migration of the fishes is eliminated to a certain extent; and

(36) when the coincidence degree between TAU and TAD does not reach 10% of TAD, namely 10% TAD>OA, this indicates that a small number of the fishes successfully migrate from the downstream river to the upstream reservoir through the fishway, the construction effect of the fishway is determined not to reach the qualified level, and the influence of water conservancy projects on the migration of the fishes is basically not eliminated.

(37) The on-site fishway effect is evaluated according to the described evaluation method.

Example 2

(38) Sampling area: a certain fishway A in Xiang River;

(39) Sampling species: Hypophthalmichthys molitrix;

(40) Sampling number: 60 tails;

(41) Sampling site number: 3 sampling sites in the upstream and downstream, respectively;

(42) Sampling time property: spawning migration;

(43) Evaluation method: evaluating according to example 1.

(44) The evaluation result is shown in FIG. 1, and the result shows: the TAU of H. molitrix is 35.8, and the TAD is 33.4. The OA is 25.4, equaling to 76.0% TAD, and being greater than 60% TAD. Hence, the construction of the fishway A is considered to have an excellent effect on H. molitrix migration.

Example 3

(45) Sampling area: a certain fishway B in Han River;

(46) Sampling species: Mylopharyngodon piceus;

(47) Sampling number: 60 tails;

(48) Sampling site number: 3 sampling sites in the upstream and downstream, respectively;

(49) Sampling time property: spawning migration;

(50) Evaluation method: evaluating according to example 1.

(51) The evaluation result is shown in FIG. 2, and the result shows: the TAU of M piceus is 20.3, and TAD is 19.4. The OA is 9.4, equaling to 48.5% TAD, and being between 30%-60% TAD. Hence, the construction of the fishway B is considered to have a good effect on M. piceus migration.

Example 4

(52) Sampling area: a certain fishway C in Xiang River;

(53) Sampling species: Aristichthys nobilis;

(54) Sampling number: 60 tails;

(55) Sampling site number: 3 sampling sites in the upstream and downstream, respectively;

(56) Sampling time property: spawning migration;

(57) Evaluation method: evaluating according to example 1.

(58) The evaluation result is shown in FIG. 3, and the result shows: the TAU of A. nobilis is 5.7, and TAD is 6.7. The OA is 1.3, equaling to 19.4% TAD, and being between 10%-30% TAD. Hence, the construction of the fishway C is considered to have a qualified effect on A. nobilis migration.

Example 5

(59) Sampling area: a certain fishway D in Dadu River;

(60) Sampling species: H. molitrix;

(61) Sampling number: 60 tails;

(62) Sampling site number: 3 sampling sites in the upstream and downstream, respectively;

(63) Sampling time property: spawning migration;

(64) Evaluation method: evaluating according to example 1.

(65) The evaluation result is shown as FIG. 4, and the result shows: the TAU of H. molitrix is 26.4, and the TAD is 21.8. The OA is 0.9, equaling to 4.1% TAD, and being less than 10% TAD. Hence, the construction of the fishway D is considered not to have a qualified effect on H. molitrix migration.

(66) To sum up, while the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. However, any simple modification, equivalent change and modification of the above embodiments according to the technical essence of the present invention will still fall within the protection scope of the technical solution of the present invention.