Recombinant Human CC10 Protein for Treatment of Influenza, Ebola and Coronavirus
20230241163 · 2023-08-03
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
Methods of using recombinant human CC10 (rhCC10), also known as recombinant human uteroglobin and secretoglobin 1A1 (SCGB1A1), to reduce virus titers in the tissues of patients, particularly influenza, ebola, and coronavirus titers in lung tissues are provided. RhCC10 may be used as a therapeutic in the treatment, cure, or prevention of viral infection, particularly influenza, ebola, and coronavirus infection. More particularly, methods, including broadly the critical dosage ranges of rhCC10, intravenous and intranasal route of administration, which may be administered to treat, cure or prevent influenza, ebola, and coronavirus infection are provided. Further provided are compositions useful in the foregoing methods and in administering rhCC10 to humans.
Claims
1. A method of reducing the titer of coronavirus in lung or nasal tissue of a patient comprising; administering human CC10 or rhCC 10 to the patient.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the rhCC10 treats, cures, or prevents a coronavirus infection in the patient.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the coronavirus is COVID-19, also known as SARS-CoV2.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the coronavirus is selected from the group consisting of SARS-CoV1 and MERS-CoV.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the human CC10 or rhCC10 is administered by the intranasal route.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the human CC10 or rhCC10 is administered by the intravenous route.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the human CC10 or rhCC10 is administered by a combination of intranasal and intravenous routes.
8. The method of reducing the titer of a coronavirus in the tissue of a patient comprising; administering human CC10 or rhCC10 to the patient.
9. The method of reducing the titer of a coronavirus in the tissue of a patient comprising; administering a recombinant secretoglobin to the patient.
10. The method of inhibiting viral replication of a coronavirus at the cellular level comprising; administering human CC10 or rhCC10 to the infected patient.
11. The method of inhibiting viral replication of a coronavirus at the cellular level comprising; administering CC10 or recombinant CC10 to the infected animal.
12. The method of inhibiting viral replication of a coronavirus at the cellular level comprising; administering CC10 or recombinant CC10 to the infected cell.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0037] Embodiments of the present invention relate to the use of CC10 to reduce pulmonary viral titer and treat, cure or prevent influenza infection. The CC10 is preferably a recombinant human CC10 protein (rhCC10) obtained by the processes described in U.S.
[0038] Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795 and PCT/US09/43613 attached hereto at Exs. A and B respectively, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety, or via any other process which yields pharmaceutical grade rhCC10. The rhCC10 of the embodiments of the present invention may be administered with, without, before or after other intranasal, pulmonary, or systemic therapy.
[0039] Without limiting the scope of possible synthetic processes that may be used to make human CC10, the recombinant human CC10 (aka uteroglobin) that is active in suppressing viral replication in vitro and in vivo was synthesized and characterized as described in U.S. Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795.
[0040] Preparations of rhCC10 for intranasal administration as described in PCT/US09/43613 represent further embodiments of the present invention that may be used to suppress viral replication in vivo, particularly in the nasal passages and sinuses.
Dosages
[0041] Preferably, in treating or preventing influenza infection, rhCC10 is administered intranasally, to each nostril 1-3 times per day, for 7-14 days, and every other day thereafter for another 14 days, and thereafter as needed. More preferably, rhCC10 is administered as soon as the patient begins to experience fever, myalgia, and congestion or is diagnosed with influenza. In particular, higher doses given more frequently, or as a continuous infusion, are effective in controlling viral replication to treat more severe infections. More specifically, discrete doses of 0.5, 1.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg may be given intravenously or by another route of administration, daily for up to 14 days, or given up to 4 times per day (every 6 hours) for up to 7 days, in order to treat the infection.
[0042] The rhCC10 may be produced in a process comprising the steps of: a) providing a bacterial expression system capable of expressing rhCC10; b) inoculating a fermenter with an inoculum comprising the bacterial expression system to form a fermentation culture; c) adding an induction agent to the fermentation culture to induce the expression of rhCC10 by the bacterial expression system; d) harvesting the rhCC10 expressed in step c; and e) purifying the rhCC10 harvested in step d, wherein the purifying step comprises the use of at least one filter and at least one ion exchange column, as described in U.S. Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795. The rhCC10 may also be expressed in alternative bacterial, fungal, insect, mammalian, or plant expression systems and purified to meet specifications for a pharmaceutical product suitable for administration to humans using standard methods.
[0043] Specifications and testing results for pharmaceutical grade rhCC10, according to U.S. Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795, that may be used to reduce viral titers include the following:
TABLE-US-00001 Test Specification Color Clear, colorless Appearance No turbidity Homogeneity Homogeneous Purity ❑ 95% Aggregation ❑ 5% Sterility Sterile Biological activity Positive Bacterial nucleic acid <100 pg/dose Mass spectroscopy App 16110 pH 5-8 Isoelectric focusing 4.7 +/- 1 Free Thiol <10% (w/w) LAL <5 EU/mg Copper <16 ❑M
[0044] In a further embodiment, the rhCC10 of the present invention that inhibits viral replication also inhibits phospholipase A.sub.2 (PLA.sub.2) enzymes, as described in U.S. Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795.
[0045] To effectuate the desired outcomes which are further described below, reference is made to methods of administration described in the following embodiments:
[0046] In one embodiment, a dose or multiple doses of intranasal rhCC10 equaling a dose ranging from about 1.5 micrograms to about 5 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day may be administered. In another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in the dose range on a daily basis. In yet another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in the dose range on a daily basis for at least seven days consecutively. In still a further embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in the dose range on a daily basis for at least 14 days consecutively. In still another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in the dose range every other day for 30 days consecutively. In yet another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in tapered dosages daily for ten consecutive days, said tapered dosages comprising a high dose at each administration for the first three days, an intermediate dose at each administration for the second three days, and a low dose at each administration for the last four days. In yet still another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in the dose range or in tapered doses up to three times per day, approximately every eight hours.
[0047] In another embodiment, the above doses of rhCC10 may be administered intranasally to the patient as an aerosol, by intranasal spray or lavage, or by deposition of a gel or cream, or other method of instillation in the nasal passages.
[0048] In another embodiment, the above doses of rhCC10 may be administered by inhalation to the patient as an aerosol, by nebulizer or metered dose inhaler, or other method of direct application to the lungs and airways.
[0049] In another embodiment, in treating or preventing influenza infection, rhCC10 is administered intravenously, in doses of 15 micrograms to 20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight, 1-3 times per day, for 7-14 days, and every other day thereafter for another 14 days, and thereafter as needed. In yet another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in tapered dosages daily for ten consecutive days, said tapered dosages comprising a high dose at each administration for the first three days, an intermediate dose at each administration for the second three days, and a low dose at each administration for the last four days. In yet still another embodiment, rhCC10 may be administered in the dose range or in tapered doses up to three times per day, approximately every eight hours.
[0050] In another embodiment the above doses of rhCC10 may be administered to the patient using a combination of intranasal, inhaled, and intravenous routes. In a further embodiment, rhCC10, in accordance with the methods described above, may be administered prior to, during or after anti-viral therapy, anti-biotic therapy, decongestant, anti-histamine, mucolytic, expectorant, mucus suppressor, surfactant, bronchodilator, vasoconstrictor, sinus pain analgesic, or other typical therapy. In still another embodiment, rhCC10, in accordance with the methods described above, may be administered to reduce pulmonary viral titer and treat, cure, or prevent influenza infection. In still another embodiment, rhCC10 may be combined with an antiviral or other drug before the combination is administered to a patient infected with influenza, ebola, coronavirus, or any other type of virus.
[0051] The doses of rhCC10 and application methods described above may be administered daily, more than once daily, three times daily, every other day or in a tapered fashion depending upon the severity of influenza infection being treated, the patient’s overall health, and whether underlying conditions are present. For example, the more severe the infection, the higher the amount of rhCC10 would be required to effectively treat it. It is understood that a physician would be able to monitor and adjust doses, formulations, and application methods as needed based on the patient’s symptoms and responses to therapy and within the parameters and dose ranges described in the embodiments of the present invention.
Formulations
[0052] Intranasal formulations, devices, and methods by which rhCC10 may be administered intranasally have been described in PCT/US09/43613, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The intravenous formulation of rhCC10 consists of a 5.5 mg/ml solution in 0.9% saline and has been described in U.S. Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Example 1
Propagation and Titer Determination of Influenza Virus
[0053] The A/PR/8/34 Influenza A viral strain (H1N1), purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manasass, Virginia, USA) is prepared. Influenza virus is propagated in MDCK cells (ATCC catalog# CCL-34) by infecting 60% confluent cell monolayer (150 cm.sup.2 flasks) with flu virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01. Three to four days later, when cytopathic effect is generalized and most of the cells have detached from the culture vessel, the cells and supernatants are harvested. Cells are removed by centrifugation (800 g) and the supernatant filtered (0.45 .Math.m) and centrifuged (18000 g) for 2 hours at 4° C. to pellet viruses. The viral pellet is resuspended in DMEM medium, aliquoted and stored at -150° C. Influenza virus titer is determined by applying 0.1 mL of serially diluted viral stocks to MDCK cell monolayers in a 96-well plate cultured in the presence of 0.1% bovine serum albumin and trypsin. Three days later, cytopathic effects were scored and the tissue culture infectious dose 50% (TCID.sub.50) is determined using Kärber’s method.
[0054] Processing of Lung Tissues for viral load analysis. Sections of the left and right lobes from lungs of infected mice and cotton rats are aseptically removed, weighed and homogenized in 1 ml of DMEM medium for 45 seconds using a tissue tearor apparatus (model#985-370, Biopspec Products Inc.) at a setting of 5. Homogenates are centrifuged at 3000 g for 20 minutes. Clarified supernatants are collected, and stored frozen at -150° C. until used. Determination of Viral Titers. Viral titers in amplified viral stocks and in lung homogenates were determined by serial dilution followed by plaque forming assay (PFA) or foci forming assay (FFA). Plaque forming units (PFU) and foci forming units (FFU) per milliliter of original sample were calculated prior to the start of the study. One set of influenza samples sufficient for carrying out PFA and FFA was stored and PFU and FFU were determined after the completion of the studies. Serial dilutions of cultured virus in clarified media (DMEM with 1% BSA) were prepared across 10.sup.1 to 10.sup.8 dilution range. Each dilution is evaluated by a plaque forming assay (PFA) and a foci forming assay (FFA). Culture titers typically yield 10.sup.7 - 10.sup.9 pfu/ml for influenza.
Example 2
Intranasal Administration of rhCC10 to Reduce Pulmonary Influenza Virus Titer
[0055] The cotton rat (S. hispidus), a type of vole, is an animal model in which influenza replicates and generates a mild respiratory infection (Ottolini, 2005). The animals are infected by intranasal inoculation with influenza virus and pulmonary viral titers peak two days (about 48 hours) after inoculation. This model is used to screen for compounds that inhibit influenza replication in vivo.
[0056] Pathogen free cotton rats were purchased from Virion Systems, Inc. (Rockville, MD). A total of eighteen cotton rats (S.hispidus, 6-8 weeks old) were infected with Type A influenza (A/PR/8/34), strain H1N1, by intranasal inoculation using 10.sup.7 TCID.sub.50 in 0.1 ml volume for each rat. Six animals received a placebo (0.9% NaC1), six animals received 0.5 mg/kg of rhCC10 and six animals received 5.0 mg/kg of rhCC10 by intranasal instillation 2 hours before viral inoculation. Animals were sacrificed on day 2 post-infection when viral titers are typically highest and viral load was determined in lung tissue.
Example 3
Systemic Administration of rhCC10 to Reduce Pulmonary Influenza Virus Titer
[0057] A total of eighteen cotton rats (S.hispidus, 6-8 weeks old) were infected with Type A influenza (A/PR/8/34), strain H1N1, by intranasal inoculation using 10.sup.7 TCID.sub.50 in 0.1 ml volume for each rat. Six animals received a saline placebo, six animals received 0.5 mg/kg of rhCC10 and six animals received 5.0 mg/kg of rhCC10 by intraperitoneal injection (IP). The IP route results in significant amounts of circulating rhCC10 and simulates the intravenous route of administration in humans. Each animal received a total of six doses of either placebo or rhCC10 approximately every 12 hours, including two doses (morning and afternoon) on the day before infection, two doses on the day of infection, and two doses on the day after infection (3 doses before infection, 3 doses after infection). Animals were sacrificed on day 2 post-infection when viral titers are typically highest and viral load was determined in lung tissue.
[0058] Based on the foregoing, rhCC10 has been found to reduce viral titer in a respiratory infection, indicating the use of rhCC10 to treat, cure and/or prevent influenza infection. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide an intranasal, and intravenous, or a combination rhCC10 based therapy effective at treating, curing or preventing influenza infection.
Example 4
CC10-Mediated Inhibition of Viral Replication at the Cellular Level
[0059] HEp2 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were used to propagate RSV, strain A-2 (Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc., Columbia, MD) and generate viral stocks. Cells were plated at 50,000 cells/well in 48 well plates and grown in MEM with 10% FBS to ~80% confluence. Cells were pre-treated with CC10 in 0.5 mL MEM for 4 hours. Medium was then changed and RSV infections were performed using 1 x 106 TCID50 per 100 mm TC dish for 1 hour. Non-adsorbed virus was removed by washing and 0.5 ml of MEM with 2% FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, and rhCC10 was added. Supernatants were collected on day 4 post infection and the virus titrated.
[0060] CC10 also inhibited viral replication in cells when given at 1, 24, and 48 hours after infection.
Example 5
CC10 Anti-Viral Mechanism of Action
[0061] The phenotype of airway epithelial cells in the CC10 knockout mouse illustrates that in the absence of CC10, the distribution of intracellular organelles is abnormal, that abnormal stacked membranous structures are present, and that secretion of other proteins made by the cell is disrupted. We surmise that this phenotype means that CC10 plays an active role in transport of secretory vesicles from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane of the cell. CC10 also modulates the uptake and processing of antigens in antigen-presenting cells. We interpret these observations to mean that CC10 is an important factor in the transport of materials both out of and in to many types of cells. We therefore infer that CC10 inhibits viral replication by interfering with viral transport in the cell. Since all viruses rely upon cellular transport processes to invade the cell and replicate, CC10 can be expected to inhibit the replication of all viruses. Likewise, other secretoglobins, which share similar structure to CC10, can also be expected to inhibit viral replication at the cellular level. Similarly, peptides derived from CC10 and other secretoglobins that modulate cellular transport processes can also be expected to inhibit viral replication.
Example 6
Inhibition of Ebola Virus Replication
[0062] Methods: Vero cells were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured to 90-100% confluence. One hour prior to infection, culture media (EMEM/NEAA, 5% FBS) was replaced with fresh media with or without rhCC10 (1.5 or 0.5 mg/ml). After one hour of exposure to rhCC10, the media was replaced with fresh media containing Ebola virus (EBOV) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3.0, 0.3, or 0 (no virus), with our without rhCC10 at the two concentrations. Virus was incubated with the cells for one hour at 37° C., then the media containing EBOV was removed, the cells were washed with PBS, the media containing rhCC10 was added. Cells were incubated at 37° C. for 24, 48, and 72 hours, after which the plates were fixed in 10% formalin to assay for plaques. To decontaminate the plates were kept in formalin for 72 hours, then placed in fresh formalin. Plates were then washed with PBS and blocked with 1% BSA overnight at 4° C. Plates were washed with PBS to remove the blocking solution and incubated in PBS containing Hoechst 33352 nuclear stain at 4° C. After 3-4 hours, the plates were incubated with a human antibody (KZ52) that recognizes the Ebola glycoprotein (EBOV GP) for 20 minutes on a platform shaker. The plates were then washed in PBS and secondary antibody (goat anti-human AlexaFluor488) was added. After 20 minutes on a platform shaker, the plates were washed and placed in PBS containing the plasma membrane dye (CellMask Deep Red) and left overnight at 4° C. The plates were imaged the next day with an Operetta system. GP-positive cells were counted and compared to total cell number to determine the percentage of cells infected with the EBOV virus.
[0063] Results: The percentage of cells infected with EBOV is the ratio of the number of EBOV GP-positive cells to the total number of Hoechst stained nuclei. At 24 hours post-infection, very few cells were infected at either MOI. At 48 hours post-infection, over 20% of the cells were infected at the lowest MOI in the absence of rhCC10. At 48 hours post-infection at the higher MOI, there was a clear dose-dependent and statistically significant (ie. p value < 0.05) reduction in the number of infected cells at both concentrations of rhCC10. At 72 hours post-infection, the reduction in the number of infected cells was significant at both MOI at the highest concentration of rhCC10 (⅕ mg/ml). The results of the experiment are shown in the Table 1 below:
TABLE-US-00002 Percent Cells Infected 24 hours 48 hours 72 hours MOI 0.3 3.0 0.3 3.0 0.3 3.0 rhCC10 (mg/ml) 0 1 15 26 66 43 53 0.5 1 14 23 51** 31 36 1.5 1 19 10 35*** 19* 30**
[0064] There were no differences in cell viability at 72 hours between cells treated with 0, 0.5, and 1.5 mg/ml rhCC10 that were not infected with EBOV, indicating that rhCC10 was not toxic to the cells. Taken together these data indicate that rhCC10 inhibits replication of the Ebola virus, thereby reducing viral titers.
Example 7
Binding of LPS by rhCC10
[0065] Binding of human SCGB1A1 to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), also known as endotoxin. LPS is made up of lipid, carbohydrate chains (polysaccharide), and a small amount of protein derived from bacterial cell membranes. LPS is an extremely potent inflammatory mediator and must be specifically reduced to a very low or undetectable level in medicinal preparations in order to minimize toxicity. We observed that synthetic human SCGB1A1 (rhSCGB1A1) binds to LPS using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) in which the migration of LPS through an agarose gel was accelerated in the presence of SCGB1A1 as shown in
Example 8
Detection of Complex Between SCGB, LPS, and Heparin
[0066] The SCGB1A1-LPS complex also binds to carbohydrate side chains and we used the EMSA to show this.
Example 9
Binding of SCGB1A1-LPS Complexes to HSPGs in Vitro
[0067] Recombinant human SDC1, SDC4, and glypican-3 (GPC3), both expressed in cultured human cells (HEK293) in order to best approximate human HSPG protein side chains in humans in vivo, were purchased from a commercial vendor. The binding of the rhSCGB1A1-LPS complexes to these three HSPG proteins was investigated using a “Far Western” dot blot method. Briefly, 200 ng each of SDC1, SDC4, GPC3, rhSCGB1A1 (positive control), and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (negative control), all in PBS pH 7.4, were spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and allowed to dry. The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS pH 7.4 for 1 hour at room temperature. The rhSCGB1A1-LPS complexes were prepared as in Example 1 (1:1 weight ratio) during the blocking step. After blocking, the membranes were equilibrated in citrate buffer, pH 6.5, then the rhSCGB1A1-LPS complexes were diluted in citrate buffer, pH 6.5 to 50 mcg/ml each of rhSCGB1A1 and LPS, added to the blocked membrane, and incubated overnight at 4° C. with gentle agitation. The membrane was washed with PBS pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T) and incubated in the primary anti-hSCGB1A1 antibody. Three different antibodies were tested, including a rabbit polyclonal, a goat polyclonal, and a mouse monoclonal as shown in
TABLE-US-00003 ROS and RNS-modified hSCGB1A1 preparations Prep ID Chemical modifier Ratio of protein to oxidizing equivalents A NaOCl 1:15 B mCPBA 1:10 C Peroxynitrite 1:10 D NaOCl 1:1
Example 10
SCGBs Bind to Lipids, Phospholipids, Other Lipids
[0068] The EMSA method of Example 1 is used to demonstrate binding of SCGB1A1 to one or more selected from among a lipid, phospholipid, surfactant component (dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), also known as lecithin, or dipalmitoyl phosphatidylethanolamine), glycerophospholipid, glycolipid, sphingolipid, glycosphingolipid, arachidonic acid, or an eicosanoid, in the absence of added calcium. An alternate method is thin layer chromatography in which spots corresponding to the lipid migrate to different positions in the presence of an SCGB, as described in Mantile et al. (1993). Briefly, photo-activatable lipids and lipid analogues are incubated with SCGBs, then cross-linked by UV exposure. Lipid controls and mixtures containing complexes of SCGBs with lipid moieties are then spotted onto pre-channeled Silica Gel G TLC plates and placed in TLC chambers with petroleum ether/diethyl ether/acetic acid (70:30: 1) eluent. Lipids are stained with iodine vapor and migration of the lipid spots with and without SCGB are compared. This illustrates that one method of synthesizing SCGB preparations of the invention is the use of photo-activatable lipids, lipid analogues, and other compounds to generate covalently linked SCGB complexes that can interact with HSPGs to mediate therapeutic effects.
Example 11
Inhibition of Coronavirus Replication
[0069] Each CoV attaches to one or more receptors on the surface of infectable cells, thereby gaining entry into susceptible cells that express the receptor(s). The major receptor for SARS-CoV1 and SARS-CoV2 (also known as COVID-19) is the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), while the major receptor for MERS-CoV is dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) (Tai, 2020), located in membranes of cells of the respiratory tract, digestive tract, and other tissues. The ACE receptor is expressed mainly on the pneumocytes and macrophages in the lungs, which are thought to be the primary cells in humans infected by SARS-CoV2 (Hoffman, 2020). The virus attaches to the ACE receptor via its spike (S) glycoprotein, triggering the cell’s machinery to endocytose the virus and allowing it to enter the cell where it hijacks to make more copies of itself. CC10 has direct antiviral activity against coronaviruses at two levels. The first level of antiviral activity involves the binding of rhCC10 to heparan sulfate side changes of both the coronavirus (CoV) S glycoprotein and its major receptor(s) on cell surfaces, thereby blocking the virus-receptor binding interaction and blocking attachment to the cells surface. The second level of antiviral activity involves the binding interactions between rhCC10 and heparan sulfate proteoglycan proteins (HSPGs). HSPGs, particularly syndecans, play a central role in endocytosis acting as co-receptors for many cell surface proteins via loose interactions between the ligand (or virus) and their glycosaminoglycan side chains that bring the ligand (or virus) closer to the receptor to facilitate receptor binding, as well as formation of endocytic vesicles that aggregate and transport the ligand-receptor pairs, or virus-receptor pairs, into the cell. CC10 binds to HSPGs on the cell surface, blocking the recruitment of virus to the cell surface and facilitating proximity of virus particles to CoV receptors during viral attachment and subsequent endocytosis, thereby disrupting viral transport into the cell.
[0070] Methods: The human bronchial epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B, was cultured in RPMI medium containing 10% FBS and antibiotic-antimycotic. Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEpC) obtained from healthy individuals were cultured in Human Bronchial/Tracheal Epithelial Cell Growth Medium containing retinoic acid. Cells were grown in 5% CO.sub.2 at 37° C. BEAS-2B and HBEpC were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured to 90-100% confluence. The media was replaced with fresh media containing coronavirus (CoV) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3.0, 0.3, or 0 (no virus), with and without rhCC10 at a concentration of 0.5 or 1.5 mg/mL. Virus was incubated with the cells for one hour at 37° C., then the media containing CoV was removed, the cells were washed with PBS, and media containing rhCC10 was added. Cells were incubated at 37° C. for 24, 48, and 72 hours, after which the plates were fixed in 10% formalin to assay for plaques. To decontaminate the plates were kept in formalin for 72 hours, then placed in fresh formalin. Plates were then washed with PBS and blocked with 1% BSA overnight at 4° C. Plates were washed with PBS to remove the blocking solution and incubated in PBS containing Hoechst 33352 nuclear stain at 4° C. After 3-4 hours, the plates were incubated with an anti-CoV antibody that recognizes the CoV spike (S) glycoprotein for 20 minutes on a platform shaker. The plates were then washed in PBS and secondary antibody (goat anti-human AlexaFluor488) was added. After 20 minutes on a platform shaker, the plates were washed and placed in PBS containing the plasma membrane dye (CellMask Deep Red) and left overnight at 4° C. The plates were imaged the next day. S glycoprotein-positive cells were counted and compared to total cell number to determine the percentage of cells infected with the CoV virus.
[0071] Results: The percentage of cells infected with CoV is the ratio of the number of CoV S glycoprotein-positive cells to the total number of Hoechst stained nuclei. At 24 hours post-infection, very few cells were infected at either MOI. At 48 hours post-infection, a substantial number of the cells (>20%) were infected at the lowest MOI in the absence of rhCC10. At 48 hours post-infection at the highest MOI, there was a clear dose-dependent reduction in the number of infected cells at both concentrations of rhCC10. At 72 hours post-infection, the reduction in the number of infected cells was significant at both MOI at the highest concentration of rhCC10 (1.5 mg/ml).
Example 12
Bacterial Expression and Recovery of rhCC10
[0072] A summary schematic of the bacterial fermentation, expression of rhCC10, and harvest of cell paste containing rhCC10 is shown in
Example 13
Purification of rhCC10
[0073] An overview of the rhCC10 purification from bacterial cell paste is shown in
Example 14
Testing of rhCC10
[0074] The rhCC10 preparations made by this process, and minor variations thereof, are comparable in all respects: apparent size, molecular weight, charge, N-terminal amino acid sequence, amount of free thiol indicating correct formation of cystine-cystine bonds, immunological recognition techniques such as ELISA and Western blotting, and biological activity. Protein purified using the copper CSFF column was tested for the presence of copper by Inductively Coupled Plasma (by QTI Inc.). No copper was detected and the detection limit of the assay was 0.5 ppm.
[0075] The following assays were established as in process assays, characterization assays and release assays for the production process and for the drug substance and drug product. The rhCC10 drug substances and drug products were compared to standard research lot rhCC10/7 where appropriate.
[0076] Bacterial Nucleic Acids. Bacterial DNA content per dose of the rhCC10 drug substance and drug product was determined by Southern blot using radiolabeled bacterial DNA followed by hybridization to blotted concentrated rhCC10 sample (Charles River Laboratories-Malvern).
[0077] Mass Spectroscopy. The molecular weight was determined by Electrospray Ionization spectrometry by M-Scan Inc. Theoretical molecular weight was determined by PAWS (a shareware program for the determination of average molecular mass, obtained through Swiss Pro). A value of 16110.6 Da was determined by the PAWS program. The same value was found for cGMP batches of rhCC10 and was confirmed by MS analysis of standard research lot rhCC10/7 as a control (determined molecular weight 16110.6 Da).
[0078] N-terminal Sequence analysis. The sequence of the N-terminus was carried out using pulsed phase N-terminal sequencing on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 477A automatic protein sequencer. The analysis was performed by M-Scan Inc. A sequence of Ala-Ala-Glu-Ile was confirmed for cGMP batches of rhCC10 with standard research lot rhCC10/7 as a control.
[0079] pH. A three-point calibration (4.0, 7.0, 10.0) is performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After calibration of the electrode the pH of the sample is determined.
[0080] Isoelectric Focusing. The pI was determined by isoelectric focusing using gels with a pH range of 3 to 7. The gels were obtained from Novex and were run under conditions as described by the manufacturer. Samples were run versus a standard from Sigma and a rhCC10 control (research lot rhCC10/7). Gels were fixed by heating in a microwave for 1 minute in the presence of 10% acetic acid / 30% methanol followed by staining with Gel Code Blue stain from Pierce. Destaining was performed in purified water as described by Pierce.
[0081] Free Thiol. The presence of free thiol was determined by reaction with Ellman’s reagent from Pierce using a modified proticol to increase sensitivity. After incubation in the presence of Ellman’s reagent the absorbance of samples was determined in the spectrophotometer at 412 nm. An extinction coefficient of 14150 M-1 cm-1 was used to determine the molar amount of free thiol. A standard curve of free thiol (cysteine) was used to monitor the linearity of the reaction.
[0082] LAL. The presence of bacterial endotoxin in rhCC10 process intermediates, drug substance and drug product was tested by the Limulus ameobocyte lysate assay as described in United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Assay No. 85. Kits were obtained from Associates of Cape Cod.
[0083] Color, Appearance, Homogeneity. The bulk drug product was visually inspected for clarity, color and visible particulate matter.
[0084] Purity and Identity: Reducing SDS PAGE. The rhCC10 drug substance and drug product was run on a Novex 10-20% Tricine SDS-PAGE gel under both reducing and nonreducing conditions as described by the manufacturer. Low molecular weight size standards were obtained from Amersham. Gels were fixed by heating in a microwave for 1 minute in a mixture of 10% acetic acid/ 30% methanol and stained with brilliant blue R250 (0.5%, w/v). Gels were destained with Novex Gel-Clear destaining solution as described by the manufacturer. Gels were then dried using the Novex Gel-Dry system and the percent purity was determined by scanning the gel (Hewlett-Packard scanner Model 5100C) and densitometry was performed using Scion Image shareware from the NIH.
[0085] Aggregation Assay. The drug product was analyzed for the presence of aggregates by chromatography on either a Superose 12 or a Sephadex 75 size exclusion chromatography (SEC) column (Amersham/Pharmacia). The column was run according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the BioRad Biologic system and peak area was determined using EZLogic Chromatography Analysis software, also from BioRad. The percent aggregation was determined by comparing the total area of all peaks vs. the area of peaks eluting prior to the main UG peak.
[0086] Endotoxin. Endotoxin levels were tested by the rabbit pyrogenicity assay as described in the USP No. 151. An amount of rhCC10 equivalent to a single human dose was administered intravenously over a 10 minute period. Body temperature increase relative to the baseline predose temperature was monitored over the course of three hours. Acceptable results consist of no temperature rise equal to or greater than 0.5° C. over the baseline results.
[0087] Protein Content. The protein contents of the process intermediates, drug substance and product were determined by the absorbance at 280 nm using a Shimadzu 120 and an extinction coefficient of 2070 M-1 cm-1 as determined by Mantile et al. (Mantile, 1993).
[0088] Sterility. The sterility assay was performed as described in the USP No. 71. Samples were incubated into Fluid Thioglycolate Media (FTM) and Tripticase Soy Broth (TSB). Positive controls for TSB media were C. albicans, A. niger, and B. subtilis. Positive controls for FTM were S. aureus, P. aeruginusa, C. sporogenes.
[0089] Testing results for rhCC10 are summarized in Table 2 and wherein positive biological activity test referred to inhibition of PLA.sub.2 activity in U.S. Pat. App. Publication No.: 20030207795, and refers to suppression of viral replication in the present invention.
TABLE-US-00004 Test results for Lot 0728 Test Result Color Clear, colorless Appearance No turbidity Homogeneity Homogeneous Purity 97.4% Aggregation 2.25% Sterility Sterile Biological activity Positive Bacterial nucleic acid <1.6 pg/mg Mass spectroscopy 16112.6 pH 6.82 Isoelectric focusing 4.7 Free Thiol <0.5% (w/w) LAL <0.01 EU/mg Copper <16 ❑M
Example 15
Safety and Tolerability of Intranasal Administration of rhCC10
[0090] As part of the safety assessment for this proof of concept intranasal administration of rhCC10 in humans adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were monitored, recorded and reported. The clinical investigator was responsible for the detection and documentation of events meeting the criteria and definition of an AE or SAE. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or a clinical investigation temporally associated with the use of the investigational drug whether or not the event is considered to have a causal relationship with the drug. In this trial, a pre-existing condition (i.e., a disorder present before the AE reporting period started and noted on the pre-treatment medical history/physical examination form) was not reported as an AE unless the condition worsened or episodes increased in frequency during the AE reporting period. Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose; 1) results in death, 2) is life-threatening, 3) requires hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, 4) results in disability/incapacity, 5) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, 6) is an important Other Medical Event (OME), and 7) all grade 4 laboratory abnormalities. The AE reporting period for began upon receiving the first dose of investigational medication and ended at the 2-week post discontinuation of investigational medication visit (follow-up visit).
[0091] No SAE’s occurred during the study. Overall, a total of 15 adverse events were reported in subjects in both the placebo and rhCC10 treatment groups. All AEs were rated as mild in severity. In each group, 11 of 15 AEs were rated as non-assessable with respect to relatedness to study drug while four of 15 AEs in each group were rates as unlikely to be related to study drug. A summary of AEs for each patient receiving placebo is given in Table 6 and for those receiving rhCC10 at the time of the AE are given in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00005 List of adverse events for patient receiving placebo Patient number Description Maximum intensity Reported as serious? Relationship to trial drug 6 Headache 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 12 Gastric influenza 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 12 Gastric influenza 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 15 Ear pain 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 15 headache 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 15 fatigue 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 15 ear pain 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 20 Sore throath 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 20 Common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 25 Headache 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 26 Sore throat 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 27 stomach ache 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 29 common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 31 Fever 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 38 urticaria 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable
TABLE-US-00006 List of adverse events for patient receiving rhCC10 Patient number Description Maximum intensity Reported as serious? Relationship to trial drug 1 Common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 2 Common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 2 Common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 7 Sore throat 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely 16 fatigue 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 16 fatigue 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 23 Headache 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 23 Common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 26 Common cold 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 28 tired 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 28 tired 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 28 headache 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 32 Headache 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 38 ague 1 = mild 0 = No 4 = not assessable 39 Mild cold 1 = mild 0 = No 1 = unlikely
[0092] Therefore, intranasal rhCC10 administration was found to be safe and well-tolerated in humans when given once daily as an aerosol in a divided dose of 1.1 milligrams, 0.56 milligrams per nostril, for seven consecutive days.
[0093] While it is apparent that the invention herein disclosed is well calculated to fulfill the objects above stated, it will be appreciated that numerous modifications and embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and embodiments as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.