METHOD FOR PREPARING TRANSPARENT FLUORINE-FREE, SUPER-LUBRICATING AND OIL-PROOF COATING

Abstract

A method for preparing a transparent fluorine-free, super-lubricating and oil-proof coating includes: dissolving a sulfhydryl compound, a styrene copolymer, a low surface energy component, and a photoinitiator in an organic solvent, conducting a uniform stirring to obtain a mixture, coating the mixture onto a substrate, and conducting a curing under an ultraviolet lamp to obtain the transparent fluorine-free, super-lubricating and oil-proof coating. The coating has excellent adhesion resistance to various organic solvents with low surface tension and even liquids with high viscosity, and has excellent chemical stability and mechanical durability. The coating can be applied to various substrates such as glass, an aluminum sheet, a steel sheet, and a polymer without limitations of a use environment, maintains excellent adhesion resistance in the environment of air, oil, and water, and has wide applicability. Moreover, according to the method, various ways such as spraying, dip-coating and spin-coating can be used.

Claims

1. A method for preparing a transparent fluorine-free, super-lubricating and oil-proof coating, wherein the method comprises the following steps: (1) dissolving a sulfhydryl compound, a styrene copolymer, a low surface energy component, and a photoinitiator in an organic solvent, and conducting a uniform stirring to obtain a mixed solution; (2) coating the mixed solution in step (1) onto a clean substrate after cleaning; and (3) subjecting a coated substrate in step (2) to a photocuring under an ultraviolet lamp, and taking out the coated substrate to obtain the transparent fluorine-free, super-lubricating and oil-proof coating; wherein in the mixed solution in step (1), the sulfhydryl compound, the styrene copolymer, and the low surface energy component have a concentration of 1-10 wt %, 1-30 wt %, and 1-15 wt % respectively; wherein the styrene copolymer comprises styrene and a plurality of substances of acrylonitrile, isoprene, butadiene, butyl acrylate, and methyl methacrylate; wherein the sulfhydryl compound is pentaerythritol tetra(3-mercaptopropionate); wherein the low surface energy component is a fluorine-free silicon-containing component with a low surface energy, and the fluorine-free silicon-containing component with the low surface energy is hydroxyl silicone oil; wherein the photoinitiator is a free radical initiator, and the free radical initiator is benzoin dimethyl ether.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the organic solvent comprises an aliphatic hydrocarbon, an aromatic hydrocarbon, a saturated alcohol, and a saturated ketone.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the organic solvent comprises toluene.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step (2), the mixed solution is coated onto the clean substrate by drip-coating, spin-coating, spraying, or pulling dip-coating.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0027] FIG. 1 shows sliding of various liquids on glass coated with a coating.

[0028] FIGS. 2A-2B are diagrams showing sliding of crude oil and kerosene on a prepared coating and a commercial fluorine-containing coating.

[0029] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing changes of the creep angle and contact angle of ethanol on the surface of a coating after exposure to wind, sun and rain in the outdoors for 30 days.

[0030] FIGS. 4A-4B are diagrams showing changes of the contact angle and creep angle of ethanol on the surface of a coating after soaking in four organic solvents for 72 hours.

[0031] FIGS. 5A-5E show crude oil resistance of a coating coated on an aluminum sheet substrate.

[0032] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing changes of the contact angle and creep angle of ethanol on the surface of a coating after ultrasonic treatment for 20 hours.

[0033] FIGS. 7A-7B are diagrams showing the state of ink on a bare sheet and a glass sheet coated with a coating, in which an excellent antifouling property is shown.

[0034] FIGS. 8A-8C are diagrams showing a sliding process of a cetane droplet on the surface of a slightly worn coating.

[0035] FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a physical device of a loop erosion experiment.

[0036] FIGS. 10A-10D show changes of the morphology of a polystyrene copolymer coating and a prepared coating before and after a loop erosion experiment.

[0037] FIG. 11 shows adhesion behaviors of cyclohexane on the surfaces of a styrene copolymer coating, a coating in Comparative Example 1, a coating in Comparative Example 2 and a coating in Example 4.

[0038] FIGS. 12A-12C show the hardness of a pencil on the coatings in Comparative Example 1, Comparative Example 2 and Example 4 in a hardness test.

[0039] FIGS. 13A-13D show electron microscopy images of the coatings prepared in Example 4, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2.

[0040] FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a sand punching device.

[0041] FIGS. 15A-15C show electron microscopy images of the surface morphology of the coatings prepared in Example 4, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 after sand punching for 60 times.

[0042] FIG. 16A shows the sliding state of 10 μL of a concentrated hydrochloric acid droplet dropped on the tilted coatings prepared in Example 4, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2. FIG. 16B shows the state of the surfaces of different coatings after 50 μL of a concentrated hydrochloric acid droplet is dropped on the surfaces of the flat coatings prepared in Example 4, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 for 28 hours.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0043] The present disclosure is further described in detail below in conjunction with embodiments and accompanying drawings, but the embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited herein.

[0044] Mixed solutions of coatings are prepared according to proportions in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 Comparative Comparative Component Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 1 Example 2 Styrene 20% 29% 25% 22% 22% 22% copolymer Sulfhydryl  5%  8%  8%  2% 0  2% compound Hydroxyl  5%  2% 12%  1%  1% 0 silicon oil

[0045] In Examples 1˜4 and Comparative Examples 1-2, a photoinitiator, namely benzoin dimethyl ether is separately added, and accounts for 1 wt %. In Example 1, a styrene copolymer is a methyl methacrylate-butadiene-styrene copolymer, a sulfhydryl compound is pentaerythritol tetra(3-mercaptopropionate), and an organic solvent is chloroform and accounts for 69 wt %. In Example 2, a styrene copolymer is an acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer, a sulfhydryl compound is pentaerythritol tetra(3-mercaptopropionate), and an organic solvent is toluene and accounts for 60 wt %. In Example 3, a styrene copolymer is a styrene-isoprene copolymer, a sulfhydryl compound is pentaerythritol tetra(3-mercaptopropionate), and an organic solvent is cyclohexane and accounts for 54 wt %. In Example 4, a styrene copolymer is an acrylonitrile-isoprene-styrene copolymer, a sulfhydryl compound is pentaerythritol tetra(3-mercaptopropionate), and an organic solvent is tetrahydrofuran and accounts for 74 wt %. In Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2, a styrene copolymer used is an acrylonitrile-isoprene-styrene copolymer. In Comparative Example 1, an organic solvent is tetrahydrofuran and accounts for 76 wt %. In Comparative Example 2, a sulfhydryl compound used is pentaerythritol tetra(3-mercaptopropionate), and an organic solvent is tetrahydrofuran and accounts for 75 wt %. The styrene copolymer, the sulfhydryl compound and the component with low surface energy were mixed and dissolved in the organic solvent according to the proportions as shown in Table 1 separately. The photoinitiator was added. The obtained mixed solutions were separately coated on the surface of a substrate by a spin-coating method. Photocuring was conducted to form films under an ultraviolet lamp (365 nm).

[0046] The following items are used for testing properties of the coatings in various examples and comparative examples on different substrates.

[0047] Test One: Adhesion Resistance of a Coating to Various Solutions

[0048] Glass coated with the coating in Example 2 was used, and different liquids such as Chinese liquor, artificial sweat, red wine, honey and edible oil were dropped on the coating on the surface of the glass from left to right. According to a state diagram as shown in FIG. 1, droplets of various solutions slide rapidly, including the honey with high viscosity. From FIG. 1, it can be seen that the coating has excellent adhesion resistance to various liquids.

[0049] Test Two: Comparison with a Commercial Fluorine-Containing Coating in Properties

[0050] Crude oil and kerosene were separately dropped onto the surface of glass coated with the coating in Example 1 and the surface of glass coated with a commercial fluorine-containing coating, and the sliding state was observed. As shown in FIGS. 2A-2B, both the crude oil and the kerosene can rapidly slide on the surface of the coating in Example 1, and wet the commercial fluorine-containing coating, indicating that the coating of the present disclosure has excellent adhesion resistance.

[0051] Test Three: Outdoor Durability

[0052] Glass coated with the coating in Example 1 was placed outdoors for exposure to wind, sun and rain for 30 days, and a diagram showing changes of the creep angle and contact angle of ethanol on the surface was observed. From FIG. 3, it can be seen that after outdoor placement for 30 days, the coating can still maintain good adhesion resistance to an organic solvent, indicating that the coating has excellent durability.

[0053] Test Four: Stability in an Oily Environment

[0054] Glass coated with the coating in Example 3 was separately put in ethanol, toluene, dichloromethane and an n-hexane solution for soaking for 72 hours, and the creep angle and contact angle lag of the ethanol on the surface were measured every 8 hours. As shown in FIGS. 4A-4B, although soaking in an organic solution for 72 hours, the surface of the coating still has excellent oil resistance, indicating that the coating has excellent stability in an oily environment.

[0055] Test Five: Crude Oil Adhesion Resistance of a Coating

[0056] An aluminum sheet substrate coated with the coating in Example 4 was fixed to a pulling dipping machine, and dipped into a beaker filled with crude oil. After being covered with the crude oil, the aluminum sheet was pulled and placed vertically. As shown in FIGS. 5A-5E, the crude oil quickly slides on the part coated with the coating and tightly sticks to the uncoated part, indicating that the coating can prevent the adhesion of oil with high viscosity.

[0057] Test Six: Binding Force of a Coating in an Underwater Environment

[0058] A glass sheet coated with the coating in Example 4 was put in a beaker filled with water, and subjected to ultrasonic treatment in an underwater environment. The slide angle and contact angle of ethanol on the surface of the coating were observed at different times. As shown in FIG. 6, after the ultrasonic treatment for 20 hours, the creep angle and contact angle of the coating are slightly increased in comparison with initial values, but the coating still maintains excellent adhesion resistance to an organic solvent, indicating that the coating still has an excellent binding force in the underwater environment.

[0059] Test Seven: Antifouling Property of a Coating

[0060] A writing brush dipped in ink was used to write on a glass sheet coated with the coating in Example 1 and a bare glass sheet separately. As shown in FIGS. 7A-7B, the glass sheet coated with the coating almost has no ink imprint, while the bare glass sheet has an obvious imprint, indicating that the coating of the present disclosure has an excellent anti-fouling property.

[0061] Test Eight: Mechanical Durability of a Coating

[0062] A scalpel was used to make scratches on the surface of a glass sheet coated with the coating in Example 2, a cetane drop was dropped on the scratched surface, and a sliding behavior was observed. As shown in FIGS. 8A-8C, the cetane droplet can still slide rapidly on the damaged surface of the coating, indicating that the coating has excellent mechanical properties.

[0063] Test Nine: Erosion Loop Experiment

[0064] The coating prepared in Example 4 and a pure styrene copolymer coating (acrylonitrile-isoprene-styrene copolymer) were sequentially put in a bend pipe of a loop pipeline, and a loop sand erosion experiment was carried out (an experimental device figure is as shown in FIG. 9). Results are as shown in FIGS. 10A-10D, where FIGS. 10A-10B are figures showing the surface morphology of the polystyrene copolymer coating before and after erosion respectively, and FIGS. 10C-10D are figures showing the morphology of the prepared coating before and after erosion respectively. From the figures, it can be seen that after sand erosion, the polystyrene copolymer coating is completely re-crushed, while the prepared coating only has a slight scratch, indicating that due to a copolymer interpenetrating network formed by physical and chemical crosslinking, the wear resistance and impact resistance of the coating are greatly improved, and the coating is endowed with excellent mechanical properties.

[0065] Test Ten: Comparison of Oil Adhesion Resistance of Different Coatings

[0066] 10 μL of cyclohexane dyed with oil red was separately dropped on the surfaces of a pure styrene copolymer coating (acrylonitrile-isoprene-styrene copolymer), the coating in Comparative Example 1, the coating in Comparative Example 2 and the coating in Example 4, and a sliding behavior of the cyclohexane droplet was observed. From a figure, it can be seen that the cyclohexane completely wets the styrene copolymer coating, the coating in Comparative Example 1 and the coating in Comparative Example 2, but slides rapidly on the surface of the coating prepared in Example 4 without any residue, further indicating that due to a thorough crosslinking structure, the coating is endowed with excellent oil adhesion resistance.

[0067] Test Eleven: Hardness Test of Different Coatings

[0068] A pencil hardness test was carried out on the coatings in Comparative Example 1, Comparative Example 2 and Example 4. From FIGS. 12A-12C, it can be seen that the surfaces of the coatings in Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 have a hardness of 6 B, while the surface of the coating in Example 4 has a hardness of 2 H, and the hardness level is increased by 9 levels, indicating that due to a thorough physical and chemical crosslinking structure, the hardness of the coating is improved, and the coating is endowed with good mechanical strength.

[0069] Test Twelve: Surface Morphology of Different Coatings

[0070] The surface morphology of a pure styrene copolymer coating (acrylonitrile-isoprene-styrene copolymer), the coating in Comparative Example 1, the coating in Comparative Example 2 and the coating in Example 4 was tested separately. As shown in FIGS. 13A-13D, FIG. 13A shows that the surface of the styrene copolymer coating has fine texture, verifying that the surface of the coating is of a polyphase separation structure. Compared with the styrene copolymer coating, the surface in FIG. 13B of the coating in Comparative Example 1 becomes smoother in morphology. However, when the styrene copolymer coating participates in a chemical crosslinking reaction, the surface in FIG. 13C of the coating in Comparative Example 2 has a uniform pore structure. The surface morphology in FIG. 13D of the coating in Example 4 was further tested, and it is found that when physical and chemical crosslinking reactions occur at the same time, the coating becomes fold in morphology. It is shown that different crosslinking structures have different kinds of surface morphology.

[0071] Test Thirteen: Sand Punching Test of Different Coatings

[0072] A sand punching test was carried out on the coating in Comparative Example 1, the coating in Comparative Example 2 and the coating in Example 4 separately. A test device is as shown in FIG. 14. Samples were put at an inclination angle of 45°, 40 g of sand was punched at a height of 40 cm above the samples, and after cyclic punching was conducted for 60 times, the surface topography of different samples was observed. From FIGS. 15A-15C, it can be seen that the surfaces of the coatings in Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 are seriously damaged to different degrees, and by contrast, the surface morphology of the coating in Example 4 is only slightly worn, indicating that the coating in Example 4 has excellent mechanical properties.

[0073] Test Fourteen: Chemical Stability Test of Different Coatings

[0074] Different coatings were obtained by using an aluminum sheet as a substrate. 10 μL of a concentrated hydrochloric acid solution was dropped on the surfaces of the coating in Comparative Example 1, the coating in Comparative Example 2 and the coating in Example 4. As shown in FIG. 16A, a hydrochloric acid droplet immediately corrodes the coatings in Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 and slides on the surface of the coating in Example 4. Further, 50 μL of a hydrochloric acid droplet was dropped on the surfaces of the above coatings, and the surfaces of different coatings were observed 28 hours later. From FIG. 16B, it can be seen that the surfaces of the coatings in Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 are completely destroyed, while the coating in Example 4 still remains intact, indicating that the coating in Example 4 has excellent chemical corrosion resistance.

[0075] Therefore, according to the super-lubricating oil-proof coating prepared by the present disclosure, by using the styrene copolymer, the coating is endowed with good toughness, and convenience is provided for application to a crimped substrate. Further, an interpenetrating polymer network structure is constructed by combining chemical crosslinking and physical crosslinking. Under the case of no micro-nano particles as an inorganic filler, the coating can obtain excellent mechanical strength while maintaining good toughness. Flexible macromolecules in the novel interpenetrating polymer network structure have excellent fluidity and can be used as a liquid-like lubricating layer, so that adhesion of liquids with high surface tension and low surface tension is prevented. More importantly, adhesion resistance to liquids with high viscosity can also be achieved. In addition, due to high physical and chemical crosslinking degrees, the coating is endowed with excellent chemical stability and mechanical durability, and the service life of the coating is greatly prolonged.

[0076] It should be noted that the above embodiments are merely used to illustrate, rather than to limit the technical schemes of the present disclosure. Although the present disclosure is described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, it should be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art that various improvements and modifications may also be made without departing from the principle of the present disclosure, and all the improvements and modifications shall be included within the scope of the claims of the present disclosure.