SYSTEM FOR WASHING BIOLOGICAL WASTE TO RECOVER SAME AS SOLID BIOFUEL
20230303938 · 2023-09-28
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C10L5/42
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C10L2290/545
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C10L2200/0469
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C10L2290/547
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
This development describes a system, a method, and specific products for washing biological waste, preferably animal manure, particularly cattle manure, particularly biological waste with high silica content and agro-industrial and forestry waste products to obtain a purified lignocellulosic product with a high calorific value that, when burned, releases low concentrations of harmful gases and does not generate or generates little vitrification inside.
Claims
1. (canceled)
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. (canceled)
7. (canceled)
8. (canceled)
9. (canceled)
10. (canceled)
11. (canceled)
12. A method for washing a slurry comprising a livestock manure to obtain a solid fuel comprising lignocellulose from a biological material obtained from livestock manure, the method comprising: feeding the slurry comprising livestock manure into a washing and humidification tank; providing rotational movement aided by a water turbulence within the washing and humidification tank to yield a liquid and solid mixture; cavitating the liquid and solid mixture to yield a washed wet solid product; and dehydrating the washed wet solid product to yield the solid fuel product.
13. The method of claim 12 where the step of dehydrating the washed wet solid product includes: filtering the washed wet solid product to separate the washed wet solid product from contaminant-containing liquid after the step of cavitating and shocking the partially washed wet solids.
14. The method of claim 12 where the step of dehydrating the washed wet solid product includes: dehydrating the washed wet solid product using a hammer mill after the step of cavitating and shocking.
15. The method of claim 12 where the step of providing rotational movement within the washing system includes injecting an ozone gas into the water turbulence.
16. The method of claim 12 further comprising: passing the solid fuel product through a vibrating screening device after the step of dehydrating the washed wet solid product to yield the sold fuel product as a fine homogeneous powder-type solid product.
17. The method of claim 12 where the step of feeding the treated slurry to the washing and impingement tank includes pumping the treated slurry using a slurry pump.
18. The method of claim 17 where the step of feeding the treated slurry to the washing and impingement tank includes passing the pumped slurry using a liquid and solid separator.
19. The method of claim 12 where the step of cavitating further comprises: using a cavitator feed pump to deliver the liquid and solid mixture to a cavitation tank, where the cavitator feed pump is configured to provide a pressure drop of at least one ATM with respect to an inlet pressure at the cavitation tank.
20. The method of claim 12 further comprising: using a cavitation and shock tank configured to generate a shock in the flow of liquid and solid mixture by either: generating one or more flows in opposite directions to provide the shock by collision of the one or more flows; or generating a flow against a plate or a tank wall; and configuring the cavitation and shock tank to provide a distance between opposing flows or between the flow against the plate that is as small as possible within a range of about 1 cm. to about 200 cm.
21. The method of claim 12 where the step of dehydrating the washed wet solid product includes compressing the washed wet solid product between an extruder mill element and disintegrating the washed wet solid product using the hammer mill.
22. The method of claim 12 where the step of dehydrating the washed wet solid product includes drying the wet solid product to yield the solid fuel product as a powder.
23. A washing system in a system for obtaining a solid fuel comprising lignocellulose based on biological material from the livestock manure, comprising: a washing and humidification tank configured to receive a slurry comprising the livestock manure providing rotational movement aided by a water turbulence to yield a liquid and solid mixture; a cavitation and shock tank configured to receive the liquid and solid mixture from the washing and humidification tank, where the cavitation and shock tank is configured to generate a flow, and to cavitate and shock the flow of the liquid and solid mixture to reduce the particulate size of the liquid and solid mixture without the use of ultrasound to yield a washed wet solid product.
24. The washing system of claim 23 further comprising a cavitation pump configured to deliver the liquid and solid mixture from the washing and humidification tank by providing a pressure drop of at least 1 ATM with respect to an inlet pressure at the cavitation and shock tank within milliseconds.
25. The washing system of claim 23 where the cavitation and shock tank is configured to generate a shock in the flow of liquid and solid mixture by: generating one or more flows in opposite directions to provide the shock by collision of the one or more flows; generating a flow against a plate; and configuring the cavitation and shock tank to provide a distance between opposing flows or between the flow against the plate that is as small as possible within a range of 1 cm. to 200 cm.
26. The washing system of claim 23 further comprising: a pump configured to feed the livestock manure to the washing system; and a solids and liquid separator to provide the slurry comprising the livestock manure from the solid separated from the livestock manure.
27. The washing system of claim 23 further comprising a livestock manure filter configured to receive the livestock manure and to filter liquid to at least partially dehydrate the livestock manure to yield the slurry comprising the livestock manure.
28. The washing system of claim 23 further comprising a wet solid filter configured to receive the washed wet solid product from the cavitation and shock tank and further dehydrate the washed wet solid product allowing contaminant-containing liquid to be removed from the washed wet solid product.
29. The washing system of claim 23 further comprising a hammer mill assembly configured to extrude and disintegrate the washed wet solid product, where the extruded and disintegrated solid is further processed to obtain a solid fuel as an organic powder or in other solid forms.
30. A solid fuel product based on livestock manure, comprising: lignocellulose, with an average particle size between 0.595-0.297, total nitrogen in percent dry weight between 0-5% w/w; total moisture by dry weight of 1-10% w/w; a high calorific power of 4200-5700 kcal/kg according to regulations UNE-EN 14918: 201 1; a low calorific power of 4000-5300 kcal/kg according to regulations UNE-EN 14918: 201 1; dry weight ash of 0-3% w/w; and dry weight sulfur of 0-0.2% w/w.
31. The solid fuel product based on livestock manure, according to claim 30, where the solid fuel product is compacted in different forms, including, but not limited to, briquettes, pellets, or another high-density mold.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT
Detailed Description
[0058] It should be understood that the present development is not limited to the particular methodology, methods, systems, composite products, materials, manufacturing techniques, uses and applications described herein, as these may vary. It should also be understood that the terminology used herein is employed for the sole purpose of describing a particular embodiment and is not intended to limit the scope and potential of the present development.
[0059] It should be noted that the method, system, product, and use, here, in the claims and throughout the text that the singular does not exclude the plural, unless the context clearly implies so. So, for example, the reference to a “use or method” is a reference to one or more uses or methods and includes equivalents known to those skilled in the art. Similarly, as another example, a reference to “a step”, “a stage” or “an embodiment” is a reference to one or more steps, steps or embodiments and may include implicit and/or supervening sub-steps, steps, or embodiments.
[0060] All the conjunctions used must be understood in the least restrictive and most inclusive sense possible. Thus, for example, the conjunction “or” must be understood in its orthodox logical sense, and not as an exclusive “or”, unless the context or the text expressly requires or indicates so. The structures, materials and/or elements described must also be understood to refer to functionally equivalent ones in order to avoid endless exhaustive enumerations.
[0061] The expressions used to indicate approximations or conceptualizations must be understood in this way unless the context mandates a different interpretation.
[0062] All names and technical and/or scientific terms used herein have the common meaning given by a common person, qualified in these matters, unless otherwise expressly indicated.
[0063] Methods, techniques, elements, compounds, and compositions are described, although similar and/or equivalent methods, techniques, compounds, and compositions to those described may be used or preferred in the practice and/or testing of the present invention.
[0064] All patents and other publications are incorporated as references, with the purpose of describing and/or informing about, for example, the methodologies described in said publications, which may be useful in relation to this disclosure. These publications are included only for the information they contain prior to the filing date of this patent application.
[0065] The following concepts are defined to provide clarity to this development:
[0066] Cavitation or vacuum suction: for the present development, the cavitation process is understood as a hydrodynamic effect that occurs when vapor cavities are created within water or any other liquid fluid in which forces are acting in response to pressure differences, as can happen when the fluid passes at high speed along a sharp edge, producing a decompression of the fluid due to the conservation of Bernoulli's constant. The vapor pressure of the liquid may reach a level such that the molecules that compose it immediately change to the vapor state, forming bubbles or, more correctly, cavities. The bubbles formed travel to areas of higher pressure and implode (the vapor suddenly returns to the liquid state, abruptly “squashing” the bubbles) producing a high-energy gas trail on a solid surface that implodes, cracking it upon impact.
[0067] The implosion causes pressure waves that travel through the liquid at speeds close to the speed of sound, regardless of the fluid in which they are created. These pressure waves can dissipate in the stream of liquid, or they can impact upon a surface. If the area on which the pressure waves collide is the same, the material tends to weaken structurally and begins to erode, which, in addition to damaging the surface, the area becomes an area of greater pressure loss and therefore an area that enhances the formation of vapor bubbles. If the vapor bubbles are near or in contact with a solid wall when they implode, the forces exerted by the liquid crushing the cavity left by the vapor give rise to very high localized pressures, causing pitting on the solid surface. Note that depending on the composition of the material used, this could lead to oxidation, with the consequent deterioration of the material.
[0068] Biomass: for purposes of this disclosure, biomass shall be understood to mean the waste products of animal metabolic processes, especially those of cattle and pigs, and other elements used for their diet. The term “biomas” can also be understood in the context of this disclosure as the waste product of a bioreactor, which has a high content of ash (heavy metals, silica, among others), a high nitrogen content, a high Sulphur content, among other parameters that will be mentioned below in the application example.
[0069] Slurry: the terms “manure”, “slurry” and “dung” are used to refer to livestock feces. The particular difference between these terms is largely unimportant for purposes of this disclosure. “Slurry” typically refers to material collected in a pond or slurry pit, while the terms “manure” and “dung” are more generic, often referring to material having a water content that is lower than that found in a slurry pit. The terms “manure” and “slurry” also do not imply any specific reference to the manner in which the material is stored or contained.
[0070] It is noted that the manner of collecting and storing the manure does not affect or change the method described or the quality of the solid lignocellulose biofuel obtained from it.
[0071] Regulations: refers generally, unless stated otherwise, to compliance with the limit parameters of standard ISO 17225-6, and also to the specific parameters of each of the analyses carried out for this development.
[0072] Silica: refers to silicon oxide, sand, and its derivatives, generally between 7% to 12% of dry bovine feces.
[0073] Nitrogen: shall be understood to mean, for purposes of this disclosure, any nitrogenous material that exists in the aforementioned animal waste, formed broadly by urea nitrogen, such as uric acid and ammoniacal nitrogen.
[0074] The subject matter of the present disclosure relates to methods, systems, and a product and by-product for synthesis (or intermediate product) that may be obtained from the treatment of slurry that allows for obtaining the greatest amount of lignocellulose as a raw material and/or fuel, the largest amount of cellulosic material as a product for burning and the by-product for synthesis, and for both, having a minimum amount of contaminants, a minimum amount of silica related to the ash residue, and a minimum amount of nitrogen. The procedure uses organic waste from livestock, which consists of feces and urine and/or slurry. Systems and methods described herein also operate with significant energy savings based on the use of energetically passive sub-steps during washing, which are described below.
[0075] The subject matter of the present disclosure also corresponds to a method for the treatment of manure that leads to obtaining a high-quality fuel product that efficiently replaces the use of firewood and coal in boilers, whether for residential or industrial use.
[0076] For purposes of this disclosure, the term “Quality” shall mean a high standard of efficiency, through a greater amount of kcal/kg, a lower emission of toxic gases, a lower generation of ash-well below the lower limits imposed by standard ISO 17225-6, which indicates between 6% to 10% w/w as combustion ash residue, with a lower production of silica as combustion residue, with a lower presence of nitrogen derivatives, as well as having a low energy consumption production process that is harmonious with current environmental standards such as caring for the environment, helping to reduce environmental pollution, decreasing gas emissions, improving the sanitary status of livestock companies, and recycling the liquids and solids involved in the process, reusing them efficiently.
[0077] The solid fuel product disclosed herein may be obtained through the treatment of slurry or manure to obtain derivatives with lignin or lignocellulose as raw material and/or fuel using examples of the systems and methods described below.
[0078] Examples of the washing system of the present disclosure may be incorporated in other systems and methods for obtaining a solid fuel product from livestock manure, such as for example, systems and methods such as those described in patent application PCT/CL2017/00009.
[0079] A slurry pit is defined as a pool that collects cattle feces and urine. Likewise, it can be composed of other elements, such as those present in cattle bedding (straw and sawdust), residues from biodigesters or bioreactors, digestates, pieces of rubber from rubber blankets, rubber, wood shavings, plant husks, such as from rice, chemical products, sand, cattle feed remains, and water, among many others.
[0080] Referring to
[0081] In one alternative implementation for feeding the slurry to the system at step (2), a slurry pump (B) having a flow rate of 80 kg/min to 14,000 kg/min takes the slurry from the slurry pit (A) and impels the slurry through a hose via step (3), which provides the slurry to a typical liquid and solid separator (C). The liquid and solid separator (C) may have a capacity of between 100 to 1000 kg/min, preferably 285 kg/min, and is configured to receive clean water (L) through passage (29), where the clean water (L) is sourced externally from springs or sources without contaminants. The slurry that has been separated by the liquid and solid separator (C) can be directed through two independent flows, at step (4) and at step (5). Step (4) provides the slurry directly to the washing system (I). Step (5) delivers the slurry to the hammer mill or simple shredder (F) to eliminate lumps. The slurry then follows through step (10) to the washing system (I).
[0082] Another way to feed the system involves a slurry pile (E), which may be formed by waste from the liquid and solid separators (C) for example, or from slurry pits and/or biogas plants and/or dung accumulation. Slurry from the slurry pile (E) may proceed at step (8) to the hammer mill or simple shredder (F) and via step (10) to the washing system (I). The slurry from the slurry pile (E) may also proceed via step (9) directly to the washing system (I).
[0083] Any of the above-described alternatives for feeding the system ultimately delivers the slurry to the washing system (I). It is noted that the above-described alternatives are describe as non-limiting examples. Other ways to feed the system may be used. For example, another alternative includes digestates directly from a biodigester or a bioreactor.
[0084] Referring to
[0085] The slurry is moved to an initial filtering device, or livestock manure filter, which may be, for example, a screen, sieve, or rotary filter 102. The filter may be optionally configured to vibrate, with a filter mesh size of 10 US mesh (2 mm) up to 40 US mesh (0.4 mm), preferably 20 US mesh (0.841 mm), which filters and separates a more homogeneous solid product than that provided by previously mentioned sources of slurry delivery, with a humidity range from 70% to 90% w/w, preferably 83% w/w.
[0086] The screen type device refers to a flat mesh optionally vibrating to improve water run-off, positioned in the range of 30° to 60°, preferably at 45°, with a filter mesh size as mentioned above. On the other hand, the sieve type device alternative corresponds to a mesh circumscribed to a frame that can optionally vibrate to better extract the water, arranged at a negative inclination. The rotating filter type device corresponds to a rotating cylindrical mesh which filters the flow that passes through it. Several of these rotary filters can be arranged in series or in parallel and be washed with external jets of clean water. Both the shaking and rotary types of filters maintain the same mesh size mentioned above.
[0087] From the screen, sieve or rotary filter type device 102, the retained solid falls by gravity into a feeder screw device 104, which is a common solids drive screw with a material displacement capacity between 500 to 2000 kg/hr., preferably 1000 kg/hr., with which the solid is moved to feed a dosing device 106 that makes portions and standardizes the amount of solid, between 500 kg/h up to 7000 kg/h, preferably 1000 kg/h to enter the next device. In this step, the humidity of the product is between 60% and 35%, preferably 45% w/w. The dosing device 106, may be, for example, a basket, screw, rocker, which generally corresponds to a system for regulating the dosage of the material with a required pressure. The dosing device 106 may be a preprogrammed funnel-type bucket that releases its content when it reaches a pre-programmed weight. The dosing device 106 may include an electro-mechanical control system for the dosage and release of the material to be measured.
[0088] Once the dosing device 106 is filled, it releases its content into the washing and humidification tank 110 through a solids entry point 108. The washing and humidification tank 110 hydrates and homogenizes the previously filtered solid and brings it to a humidity between 85% and 99% by weight, preferably 97% by weight. The washing and humidification tank 110 comprises: a tank with a capacity between 5 and 100 m.sup.3, preferably 35 m.sup.3, with an inlet for the washing water 112, which can be above or below the tank, and through this inlet is optionally injected ozone (O.sub.3), and another point of entry of the solid 114 to be treated. The washing and humidifying tank 110 also includes, in the center, a tubular paddle agitator device 116 that, when it rotates, generates a centripetal effect from the rotating movement that sucks the mixture from below the tank into its interior and releases it through the upper part of the tube, where the washing water from the first injection 112 may also be used to generate a stream that drags the solid, separating it in combination with the previously mentioned centripetal movement effect. Alternatively, the contents of the washing and humidification tank 110 can simply be centrifugally agitated from the center through paddles with the respective washing water from the first inlet 112, generating a torrent that drags and separates the solid. After this, if there is excess liquid in the washing and humidification tank 110, it is expelled through a level transfer outlet 118, in the upper part of the washing and humidification tank 110, transferring the content back to the slurry pit or tank (A).
[0089] The washing and humidification tank 110 also fulfils the function of homogenizing and degassing the excess Ozone (O.sub.3), after which and continuing with the process, the transfer of solids is channeled directly from the washing and humidification tank 110 to a cavitation and shock tank 120 by means of cavitator feed pumps 122 with a flow capacity, per cavitator, between 100 and 3000 L per minute, preferably 800 L per minute per cavitator, with powers between 2 and 50 Kw, preferably and by way of example without wanting to restrict other capacities of the system, 4 Kw/h to be able to process between 400 and 1500 kg/hour of slurry with a range between 85% and 99% humidity on dry basis, preferably 90%, preferably 97%, preferably 98%, preferably 99%, preferably to process 500 kg/h of fibers. To produce the ozone-water mixture, it is prepared in an attached ozone preparation tank 124, where ozone is bubbled through ozone-generating machines 126 into a volume of water (J) between 1000 L/h up to 320,000 L/h, preferably 100 to 14,000 L/min, preferably 1,000 L/min.
[0090] Referring to
[0091] The number of cavitator feed pumps 122 is proportional to the number of jets through which the liquid to be treated passes through cavitation ducts 130. Therefore, a jet that passes through a cavitation duct 130 must be driven by a pump or several jets with greater power. The cavitation ducts 130 can operate in series or in parallel, depending on the layout of the system, it can be one or “n” depending on the amount of product to be processed. In one example, one cavitation duct or preferably two cavitation ducts are used. The cavitation and shock tank 120 comprises a series of components as described further with reference to
[0092] Referring to
[0093] Internally, the cavitation duct 130 comprises three sections, ordered from the inlet for the waste flow to the outlet in the final granulometric filtering (vi). First, the cavitation duct 130 is fed from the washing and humidification tank 110 passing through the cavitator feed pump(s) 122, where these residues enter through the diameter of an inlet duct 152 in a first nozzle section 136 in which the internal diameter of the cavitation duct 130 is reduced with a nozzle angle of between 15° and 35°, preferably 21°. This reduction in an internal diameter 150 of the cavitation duct 130 ranges from a slight reduction in the inlet internal diameter of the cavitation duct 130 to ⅕ of the internal diameter, preferably ⅓.
[0094] This section has a length between 7 cm and 41 cm, preferably 107 cm, preferably 110 cm. Reducing the diameter of the duct in this section rapidly increases the flow rate of the fluid at a constant inlet pressure.
[0095] Following the flow of the residue, next comes a second flow load section 138, which maintains a constant internal diameter in relation to the tapering in the internal diameter of the previous section, where this flow load section 138 comprises a length between 4 and 23 cm, preferably 6 cm, preferably 11 cm. In this section a high flow rate is maintained at a constant pressure.
[0096] Continuing with the conduction of the fluid, comes a third and last section of the cavitation and laminar flow duct 132, which is a diffuser 140 where the internal diameter of the cavitation duct 130 is widened again at an angle between 5° and 10°, preferably 7°, until reaching the same inlet diameter 152 of the cavitation duct 130, where the length of this section ranges from 22 cm to 124 cm, preferably 33 cm, preferably 49 cm. In this section, the cavitation effect is produced because when the fluid comes with a high flow rate (high speed) and passes through the edge of the angle that is formed when the diameter of the duct expands, a sudden pressure drop is generated, which generates microbubbles in the fluid and their coalescence, managing to agitate the fibers, agglomerates and particles mixed in the fluid, preferably silica particles, preferably waste derived from nitrogen, Sulphur derivatives, heavy metal derivatives such as cadmium, mercury, lead among others, and waste fibers. In this section and depending on the differences in the flows (relative velocities of the fluid) formed, the inlet pressure to the cavitation duct 130 can go from a constant pressure to 25% of that pressure in milliseconds, preferably 50%, by way of example, and without limiting other ranges, from 4 ATM (atmospheres) to 0 ATM of pressure at the outlet of this section. The process carried out in the cavitation duct 130, does not consume energy, and achieves, through a physical process, efficient separation of the fibers, the silica, and the rest of the components of the treated waste in order to deliver a pre-processed product to the final granulometric filter 158, so that it, in turn, achieves maximum cleanliness.
[0097] Then, and continuing with the flow direction, a second element called the shock duct (g2b) 142 is connected, which communicates directly with the cavitation duct 130 and delivers its pre-processed product to the impingement of flows. This shock duct (g2b) 142 comprises three sections, where the first section maintains the same internal diameter of the inlet 150 to the cavitation duct 130 and is called a separation section 154, where the flow is partly retained, maintaining a laminar flow and a physical space is provided for the component elements of the waste to be separated. This section comprises a length of 14 cm to 76 cm, preferably 20 cm, preferably 30 cm.
[0098] The second section of the shock duct (g2b) 142, in the direction of the flow, corresponds to an outlet reduction section 144, where the inlet diameter 152 is reduced to a larger diameter 148 with respect to the reduction diameter 150 of the flow load section 138, in the range of between 45% and up to slightly less than the internal diameter of the cavitation duct 130, preferably by 50%; the length of this section it is between 2 cm and 11 cm, preferably 3 cm, preferably 5 cm. The angle of reduction in this section is of the order of between 25° and 35°, preferably 30°. This section, despite the reduction in the diameter of the duct outlet (148, induces a reduced pressure, so it does not generate greater resistance and additional pressure variations.
[0099] Finally, the last section before washing the residue is an outlet section 146, which can be directed and will guide the outlet jet of the residue to the final granulometric filter 158. This section maintains the reduced diameter of the previous section and has a length of between 1 cm and 7 cm, preferably 2 cm, preferably 3 cm.
[0100] Inside the cavitation and shock tank 120 two output jets are made to collide with each other, or an output jet against one of the walls of the tank, or against a sheet or deflector from shock ducts 142, where the direction of the collision between jets is preferably frontal, although it can be angled if there are more than two jets, at a distance of between 1 cm and 200 cm, preferably 2 cm, preferably 10 cm, preferably 50 cm, preferably 100 cm, preferably 150 cm, where the ability to shred the fibers of the jets is indirectly related to the distances between the shock ducts 142, in other words, the smaller the distance, the greater the shredding. To improve the frontal impingement of two jets, an optional part is presented, which makes the two shock ducts 142 face one another, called the steering and shock tube 156, which consists of a tube with the same diameter as the shock duct outlet 142 but with two lateral perforations 162 and one lower central perforation 168 that fulfil the objective of channeling the explosion of the jet as shown in
[0101] Cavitation and flow impingement generate an unexpected effect in the present development, which consists in that externally applied oxidizing species such as O.sub.2 and O.sub.3 react chemically with subspecies derived from nitrogen, Sulphur, and other pollutants, partly volatilizing this nitrogen, Sulphur and other contaminants, as volatile elements in combination with oxygen, thus removing part of this contaminant from the end product. In order to eliminate these volatile contaminants, the cavitation and shock ducts 120 also includes a gas outlet duct 172 in its upper part that channels and bubbles the gases in the biological material concentrate and inert impurities tank (G) in order to enrich this residue with the dissolved gases generated in the cavitation and shock ducts 120 in step 14.
[0102] The cavitation and shock tank device also includes a product outlet 170 from the flow impingement, a handle 174 for maintaining the cavitation ducts and a viewer 176 for verifying the operation of the device. In general, the product that comes out of the impingement has a humidity in the range between 85% and 99% w/w on a dry basis, preferably 90% w/w, 98% w/w and 99% w/w.
[0103] By gravity, the product resulting from the impingement of flows falls and is positioned on a wet solid filter, or a final granulometric filter device 158, that corresponds to a final device such as a screen, sieve, or rotary filter 158, which can optionally vibrate, with a filtering mesh size of between 0.25 to 2 mm (10 to 60 US mesh). The final filter 158 filters and separates a more homogeneous and finer solid product than the one delivered by the previously mentioned cavitation and shock ducts 120, with a humidity range between 70% and 90%, preferably 83%, where the moistened fibers are retained and the liquid with its respective contaminants is filtered a second time. This device is arranged at an angle that ranges from 10° above the horizontal to 80° above the horizontal, preferably 45°. For this second filtration, the screen, sieve, and rotary filter type devices are similar to those described for the first granulometric filter. On the other hand, the solid retained in this final filter can be sprayed with recycled water (J) or clean water (L) before passing to the next device.
[0104] Finally, and continuing with the handling of solid products, the solid that falls from the shock of the flows, mentioned above, may be deposited by gravity into a hammer mill screw assembly 166, an example of which is shown in
[0105]
[0106] The washed wet solid falls by gravity to the inlet hopper 194, where the solid is channeled via a screw shaft 192 to move the solid against the tightening system 194.
[0107] The wet washed solid moves along the screw axis (j1) 192 towards the tightening system 194 and passes through a sieve device 220. The sieve device 220 includes a circular sieve element 222 with between 80 and 1000 slides, preferably 112, with measurements, by way of non-limiting example, of 400 mm long, 30 mm wide and 2.5 mm thick, with a mesh size of between 0.05 and 3 mm. The circular sieve element 222 is supported on a sieve support 224 and wrapped in a sieve casing 226, which fulfil the function of channeling the water extracted in the tightening and channeling it through a drain 228 to be recirculated, retaining the solid in the inner surface of the screening device 220. This sieve device 220 is easily removable by means of a sieve handle 230 for cleaning, where in addition to extracting the sieve element 222, the device cover 232 can be removed.
[0108] The above-referenced tightening system 194 comprises an area delimited by an upper cover 240, an upper side cover 242 and a lower side cover 244 that support the accumulation of solid material chopped by means of a set of blades 250 that are tightened on a blade holder 252, which in turn is stabilized on the horizontal axis by a spring 254, which in turn exerts pressure against the direction of the material via the screw shaft 192. The tightening system to hold onto the extruder mill element of the hammer mill screw assembly 166, is mounted through a lever-holder 256 that holds a plurality of levers 258, which holds the tightening system 194 to the entire device in an easy and removable way in case the blades 250 need replacing. This tightening system 194 remains in a firm position without rotating, but allows the screw shaft 192 to rotate freely, causing the retained solid to be squeezed, increasing the draining time, leaving a more dehydrated solid material.
[0109] On the other hand, the tightening system 194 compresses and shreds the solids and when they partially accumulate on the screw shaft 192 they release liquid in the sieve device 220. Most of the solids, however, fall due to pressure and gravity to a grinding assembly 262, which may be a hammer mill corresponding to the second element of the hammer mill screw assembly 166 referenced above. The grinding assembly 262 may include a support box 264 and a circular output 268 of solid material, internally it comprises a set of grinding or shredding blades 266 in the shape of a symmetrical cross mounted on a tube 270, which rotates on a square grinding shaft 272, where for this rotation, the grinding shaft 272 is positioned between two square base bearings 274 at each end of the tube outside the box. The blades rotate due to the energy delivered during the rotation of a pinion 276 and due to the pressure exerted by the solid trying to come out due to the restriction generated by a grid 278 with a mesh size slightly greater than the thickness of the blade. In order for the grinding assembly to be in position and to rotate freely on its shaft, it also contains a grinding assembly support bearing 280, which is mounted on a grinding assembly support 282.
[0110] Continuing with the extruder mill element, on the screw shaft 192, after the tightening system 194, comes the bearing 260 and a main support 284 that supports most of the hammer mill screw assembly 166. Continuing with the same arrangement, comes a pinion area, delimited by the upper cover (j19) an upper cover 286 and side covers (j21) 288, this area protects a set of large 290 and 292 small pinions mounted on the shaft 202, where the large pinion 290 provides the mechanical energy to the grinding assembly 262. After this comes a reducer motor 294 that delivers power to the entire hammer mill screw assembly 166. This motor is directly associated via a standard motor shaft 296 to the shaft 202 to deliver rotation to the entire device, with a speed between 10 to 250 rpm. By way of example, this motor can have a capacity of 10 Hp and a speed of 140 rpm, without limiting the capacity and power of the motor to this specific example. On the other hand, the motor is supported on a motor base 300 and is positioned by a motor support 302.
[0111] The efficiency of the hammer mill screw assembly 166 may be such that it begins working with solids with moisture around 85% w/w and after all the milling, pressing, shredding, and filtering processes it reaches a mixture of fibers with a humidity under 30% w/w, which results in lower energy consumption in later steps for efficient drying of the end product. Also, the size of the final fiber is in the range of 0.595-0.297 mm, considering 72% of the total sample, which provides a greater surface area for exposure to oxidants and fire in the final combustion of the product, thus improving the efficiency of the final combustion.
[0112] The solid product exits the hammer mill screw device 166 substantially more dehydrated and continues with post-washing processes that may further treat the solid product further to yield a final product. Such processes may be similar to those disclosed in the PCT patent application no. PCT/CL2017/00009.
[0113] Referring to
[0114] The material that has been processed may be incorporated into the pelletizing process (T) via step (20) to finally form pellets and/or lignocellulose briquettes and/or some other solid form to be burned.
[0115] The washing systems and methods disclosed herein, in addition to cleaning all kinds of impurities from the outside of the fiber, is also capable of cleaning the fiber on the inside, which is full of bacteria, enzymes, gastric juices that are responsible for dissolving cellulose and hemicellulose to transform them into sugars, but when they leave the animal they remain inside the fiber as contaminants and when burned they emit odors and gases that are harmful to health.
[0116] The washing systems and methods disclosed herein are also capable of cleaning the inside and outside of the fiber of silica residues, thus improving the end product by eliminating its ability to vitrify inside boilers and stoves.
[0117] The process in the washing system (I) of the present disclosure includes: [0118] 1) initial and final granulometric filtering, [0119] 2) dosing, [0120] 3) centripetal or centrifugal movement, [0121] 4) water turbulence, [0122] 5) optional ozone injection, [0123] 6) cavitation, [0124] 7) impingement, and [0125] 8) hammer mill screw dehydration.
[0126] These steps may be performed in known systems and processes to achieve a double objective of (1) minimum energy consumption in the process by having sub-steps that do not consume energy, and (2) an end product of high energy power with a minimum of contaminants, especially nitrogen and ash, among others. This system may be configured to enable the release of all contaminants both inside and outside the solid components of the slurry and its mixtures in a continuous process, and provide a solid product with particular characteristics. As previously mentioned, the application of chemical agents is not contemplated nor required in the example implementations of the systems and methods described herein. The examples of the washing system (I) and method in the total performance of the system are a fundamental part of this development.
[0127] The sub-steps of the washing system process (I) may include: [0128] i. Impulsion through the Slurry Pump (B): movement of the slurry from the slurry pit (A) moving the slurry mixture. [0129] ii. Initial granulometric filtering: this sub step corresponds to an initial filtering by means of a screen, sieve, or rotary filter to achieve standardizing and slightly reducing the humidity of the solids being processed, in general the solids received have a humidity of less than 85% w/w. The solids obtained are transported by a screw where the percentage of humidity decreases below 80% w/w. [0130] iii. Dosage: this sub step corresponds to measuring the weight of a quantity of solid to enter the next sub step of the process. Mainly, the weight of a quantity of solid is measured by means of an automated basket and its content is released into the washing and humidification tank (v). [0131] iv. Centripetal or centrifugal movement with water turbulence and optional ozone injection: these are mentioned as sub-steps to be performed inside the washing and humidification tank 110. The fiber-containing mixture is rehydrated through the water inlet (J), which moves and drags the fiber-containing mixture, in parallel as a first alternative, in the center of the tank a tubular paddle agitator sucks this hydrated mixture and raises it by centripetal movement to the top of the apparatus where it spills out in the center of said tank. A second alternative is simply an agitator paddle in the center of the tank, generating a centrifugal effect in the mixture. Optionally, a mixture of water with premixed ozone can be added to the tank in order to eliminate microbiological material and compounds derived from nitrogen, compounds derived from Sulphur and other compounds from later sub-steps. For this, the ozone-water mixture is prepared in an attached ozone preparation tank 124, where ozone is bubbled through ozone generating machines 126 in a volume of water (J) between 1000 L/h up to 320,000 L/h, preferably 33,000 L/h, until reaching a concentration in the range of 900 to 1,200 ppb and this mixture, in turn, is reinjected into the washing and humidification tank 110, as previously mentioned. [0132] v. Cavitation and shock: The liquid and solid that comes out of the washing and humidification tank 110 is raised by the previously described cavitation pumps 122 and the flow passes through the cavitation and shock tank 120. Within a cavitation duct 130, the physical reaction of cavitation occurs within the liquid and within the retained moisture contained in the fibers, generating a very high-speed micro-bubbling effect that mechanically destabilizes contaminants and different types of fibers within the mixture. The destabilized contaminants and different types of fiber may then be separated by impingement, which may be performed using different flows from different cavitation ducts 130, or using a single duct and a wall of the cavitation and shock tank 120. Cavitation and shock may in turn be separated into three phases. The first phase is cavitation of the flow. The second phase is separation and lamination of the flow. The third phase is flow impingement. [0133] vi. Final granulometric filtering: this sub step occurs after the impingement sub-step inside or against the cavitation and shock tank 120, where the wet solid passes by gravity through a final granulometric filter 158, which corresponds to a final filtering by means of a screen, sieve or rotary filter, which retains the moistened fibers and filters the liquid with its respective contaminants a second time, in general the moistened fibers have a humidity between 80% and 85%. [0134] vii. Dehydration by a hammer mill screw: the wet solid from the previous sub-step enters a hammer mill screw 166 with a configuration of two elements that first proceeds to push the solid and squeeze it through the extruder screw element, which dehydrates it until left with a mixture of fibers with a moisture content below 30% w/w, and then the second hammer mill element that shreds the resulting solid.
[0135] It is noted for an example implementation, the power necessary for the cavitation and shock step (v) is a cavitation pump power 122 in a range from 2 Kw to 50 Kw. In an example implementation, without limiting other capacities of other example systems, a power of 4 Kw is found to be able to process 1200 kg/h of slurry at 80% humidity or higher leaving the diluted fiber in a range of 0.5% to 5%, preferably 2%, preferably 2.5%, preferably 3%, in water, which is the ideal medium for the cavitation step with flow rates of, for example, 500 L/min passing through the cavitator tube 130. As previously mentioned, the fluid to be treated is required to have a predetermined humidity and dilution to enable operation in the cavitator tube 130, where within these parameters the ideal is a humidity of 97% and a particle size no greater than 20 mm.
[0136] After passing through the cavitation comes the separation and lamination of the flow where the flow is slowed down and its pressure is stabilized. Once the flow is stabilized and laminated, it is released by making the flows collide against each other, this means that if there are only two jets they collide in opposite directions, adding their speed; if there are more than two jets, these collisions are in pairs or in trios neutralizing the projection outside by the cavitation and shock tanks 120.
[0137] It is further noted that for an example implementation, to extract the cellulosic fibers and lignin with its derivatives, and as the final part of the washing process, step (vii) uses the hammer mill screw assembly 166. This screw is also a desiccator screw because it manages not only to move the fibers to the subsequent drying steps, but also to extract the water from the mixture from 98% to 30% w/w (the state of the art generally mentions that screws, in general, leave between 70% to 80% of moisture in the mixture), which saves time and energy when drying the fibers in later steps.
[0138] This screw can be used in other drying or moisture reduction processes regardless of the method and field of application of the present development.
[0139] To achieve these effects, the hammer mill screw assembly 166 operates at a high speed of between 20 rpm up to 200 rpm, preferably 140 rpm, preferably 70 rpm, in a small diameter and with internal fiber-breaking blades, as mentioned earlier in their description.
[0140] The particle size coming out of the hammer mill screw assembly 166 is in a low range of 0.595-0.149 mm.
[0141] With respect to the end product obtained as pellets or briquettes for burning, according to Table I it comprises:
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Unit Range Higher Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 4200-5700 Lower Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 4000-5300 Total Humidity (w/w %) 1-10 Ash (w/w %) 0-3 Sulphur (w/w %) .sup. 0-0.2 Nitrogen (w/w %) .sup. 0-0.5 Particle Size (mm) 0.595-0.297
PARTS LIST
[0142]
[0143]
[0144]
[0164]
[0185]
[0186]
EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION
[0235] This example was developed in the slurry pits of the Las Garzas agricultural laboratory.
[0236] On Aug. 17, 2020, 5450 kg of mainly bovine slurry were used and the procedure of the present development was applied. The cleaning water used comes from a well in the area, with water with a high content of dissolved salts.
[0237] Slurry and manure samples were taken initially, delivering the following summary of analytical results, as shown in Table II:
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II Unit of Parameter measured measurement Slurry pit Manure Higher Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 3,376 3,571 Lower Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 3,107 3,277 Lignin (%) 2.4 24.7 Cellulose and hemicellulose (%) 4.5 45 Particle size (mm) NS 10-0.595 (67% of particles) Total Humidity (%) 89.21 9.13 Ash (%) 18.5 26.57 RAW MATERIAL COMPOUNDS Sulphur (%) 0.3563 0.3598 Carbon (%) 40.76 42.98 Hydrogen (%) 5,242 5,687 Nitrogen (%) 1.797 2.908 Oxygen (%) NS NS Mn (Manganese) (ppm) 130.43 166.45 As (Arsenic) (ppm) <0.01 <0.01 Pb (Lead) (ppm) <0.01 <0.01 Cu (Copper) (ppm) 29.63 42.47 Cr (Chromium) (ppm) 6.95 10.95 Cd (Cadmium) (ppm) 1.042 0.89 Mo (Molybdenum) (ppm) 4,866 7.42 Hg (Mercury) (ppb) 1.2 1.0 Ni (Nickel) (ppm) 2.829 6,818 V (Vanadium) (ppm) 11,121 4,113 Co (Cobalt) (ppm) 0.547 0.348 Zn (Zinc) (ppm) 70,056 121,442 Sb (Antimony) (ppm) <0.01 <0.01 ASH COMPOUNDS SiO.sub.2 (%) NS 1.23 Other compounds (%) 22.42 TOTAL (%) NS 23.65
[0238] After passing the slurry through this process, the final pellet of the same was also sampled, delivering the following analytical results, according to Table III.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE III Unit of Parameter measured measurement Pellets Higher Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 4,550 Lower Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 4,219 Lignin (%) 35.6 Cellulose and hemicellulose (%) 62.7 Particle size (mm) 0.595-0.297 (72% of particles) Total Humidity (%) 6.96 Ash (%) 1.7 RAW MATERIAL COMPOUNDS Sulphur (%) 0.14 Carbon (%) 50.23 Hydrogen (%) 5.97 Nitrogen (%) 0.44 Oxygen (%) NS Mn (Manganese) (ppm) 51 As (Arsenic) (ppm) <0.01 Pb (Lead) (ppm) 12.2 Cu (Copper) (ppm) 13.23 Cr (Chromium) (ppm) 3.13 Cd (Cadmium) (ppm) <0.01 Mo (Molybdenum) (ppm) 7.42 Hg (Mercury) (ppb) 1.2 Ni (Nickel) (ppm) 2.98 V (Vanadium) (ppm) 2.03 Co (Cobalt) (ppm) <0.01 Zn (Zinc) (ppm) 29.49 Sb (Antimony) (ppm) <0.01 Cl (Chlorine) (ppm) 70 ASH COMPOUNDS SiO.sub.2 (%) 1.21 Other Compounds (%) 19.29 TOTAL (%) 20.5
[0239] For the comparative calculation of the reduction of Silicon, it should be noted that the percentage of Silicon varies fundamentally in relation to the percentage of Ash, and the latter with respect to the total product.
[0240] The following processes were used for the analyses under international standard conditions as shown in Table IV.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE IV Test Methods Sample preparation UNE-CEN/TS 14780 EX Applicable: solid biofuels Ash UNE-EN 14775 Elemental analysis (C, EN 15104 H, N) Applicable: solid biofuels Sulphur content EN 15289 Applicable: solid biofuels Determination of major UNE EN 15290 elements in biomass by ICP-OES (Ca, Al, Mg, K, Na, Si, P, Ti, S, Fe) Determination of UNE EN 15297 minority elements in biomass by ICP-OES (Cr, Cu, Zn, Pb, As, Mo, V, Mn, Ni, Cd, Co, Sb) Sample digestion (for UNE EN 15290 majority and minority elements) Determination of UNE-EN 15297, December 2011 Applicable: minority elements in Solid biofuels I-L-094, based on the biomass by Hydride Manual of the AAS AAnalyst 400 Generation AAG Arsenic (quantification) equipment Determination Determination of minor UNE-EN 15297, December 2011 Applicable: elements in biomass by Solid biofuels (digestion) I-L-089, Cold Vapor AAS Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapor Determination of Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Mercury
[0241] The following Table VIII shows the analyses performed on the reactants and products of the patent application by the same inventor PCT/CL2017/00009.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE VIII STANDARDS USED ASTM Standard Practice for http://www.astm.org/Standards/D3172.htm D3172-13 Proximate Analysis of Coal and Coke ASTM D4239 - Standard Test Method http://www.astm.org/Standards/D4239.htm 14e2 for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High-Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion ASTM D4239 - Standard Test Method http://www.astm.org/Standards/D4239.htm 14e2 for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High-Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 14774-1: 2010 Determination of orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0045726#.VxD5C6jh moisture content. DIU Oven drying method. Part 1: Total humidity. Reference method. UNE-EN Solid biofuels. Method http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 14775: 2010 for the determination orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0045971#.VxEDa6jh of ash content. DIU UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 14918: 2011 Determination of orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0046857#.VxD8Bqjh calorific value. DIU UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 15104: 2011 Determination of total orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0048348#.VxD8X6jh carbon, hydrogen and DIU nitrogen content. Instrumental methods. UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 15104: 2011 Conversion of orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0048440#.VxD- analytical results from GqjhDIU one base to another. UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 15148: 2010 Determination of orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0045972#.VxD5hajh volatile matter content DIU UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 15289: 2011 Determination of total orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0048352#.VxEGcqjh sulphur content. DIU UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 15296: 2011 Determination of orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0048507#.VxD2xqjh minority elements. As, DIU Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, V and Zn UNE-EN Solid biofuels. http://www.aenor.es/aenor/normas/normas/fichan 15297: 2011 Determination of the orma.asp?tipo=N&codigo=N0048352#.VxD4tKjh total content of minor DIU elements, mercury, and arsenic
[0242] Particle size was measured under standard EN 15149-1, by the transfer of particles through different sieves and the weight of the material retained in each one for the product that was being measured, in order to calculate the majority percentage retention for a range of particle sizes.
[0243] The measurement of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose was carried out based on standard ASTM D-1106.
[0244] As can be seen by comparing the results of Tables II and III, the step of the washing system achieves toxicity parameters (referring to the chemical elements that can produce risks) that are much lower than those already known, also, in the final pellet silica, particle size and nitrogen levels are achieved that are extremely lower than those of origin.
[0245] Regarding the process, apart from having more efficient steps with respect to washing the fiber and the end product, energy consumption is unusually lower compared to the state of the art with respect to particle size. This is due to the use of energetically passive steps for the fiber washing process. This can be verified comparatively in the following Table V:
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE V Power of installed process equipment kW Installed power Operating kW PCT/ PCT/ ITEMISED CL2017/ Development CL2017/ Development SECTION 00009 Process 00009 Process Purine pump (B) 4 4 3 3 Traditional 4 0 3 0 Extruder Screw (F) Gutter 0 0 0 0 Agitator Tank 4 0 3 0 Screen 102 0 0.25 0 0.1875 Traditional 2 2 1.5 1.5 Extruder Screw 104 Dispenser 106 0.5 0.5 0.375 0.375 Humidifier 110 0.75 2 0.5625 1.5 Cavitating 0 4 0 3 Impingement 120 Ultrasound 8 0 6 0 Ultrasound tank 2.5 0 1.875 0 Screen or Sieve 0 0.25 0 0.1875 158 Rotary Separator 1 1 0 0.75 0 IBC 1 2.2 0 1.65 0 Rotary Separator 2 1 0 0.75 0 IBC 2 2.2 0 1.65 0 Flocculation tank 2.2 0 1.65 0 Water Tank 2.2 2.2 1.65 1.65 Ozone 126 2 2 2.25 2.25 Hammer mill screw 0 7.5 0 5,625 166 Traditional Screw 4 0 3 0 Total 44 26 33 19 Percentage 75% 30% 75% 30% moisture in Biomass Output Percentage 59% 59% decrease in Power kW
[0246] As can be seen, the decrease in energy by the new development is verified as 59%, with a 40% decrease in the percentage of water in the end product obtained.
[0247] When analyzing the result above, we consider that the cavitation and subsequent impingement steps are passive steps of lower energy consumption with respect to the ultrasound indicated in the state of the art. On the other hand, the hammer mill screw dehydration step is highly efficient in dehydrating the fibers, leading to a lower energy consumption in the dryer. The product can be compared before the dryer operation of application PCT/CL2017/00009, where the humidity range was between 65% to 75% w/w; on the other hand, the current humidity range handled before the dryer is in the range of 30% to 35% w/w. If you add to this a smaller average particle size range for the current product, it results in almost 71% less energy consumption by the dryer.
[0248] On the other hand, to verify the energy efficiency of the hammer mill screw 166 of this process, the efficiency of the device with respect to its energy consumption was verified, as seen in Table VI:
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE VI Screw hammer mill performance per 100 kg expressed in dry matter heat energy to heat energy to % Moisture kW necessary to evaporate water evaporate water in slurry Kilos of Litres obtain 100 kg dry from 10° C. in from 10° C. in sample Dry Matter of water matter (motor power) Kcal kW 90% 100 900 0.05 570,780 664 85% 100 567 0.08 360,990 420 80% 100 400 0.54 255,780 297 75% 100 300 1.00 192,780 224 70% 100 233 1.46 150,570 175 65% 100 186 1.91 120,960 141 60% 100 150 2.37 98,280 114 55% 100 122 2.83 80,640 94 50% 100 100 3.29 66,780 78 45% 100 82 3.74 55,440 64 40% 100 67 4.20 45,990 53 35% 100 54 4.66 37,800 44 30% 100 43 5.12 30,870 36 25% 100 33 5.58 24,570 29 20% 100 25 6.00 19,530 23 15% 100 18 15,120 18 10% 100 11 10,710 12 5% 100 5 6,930 8 0% 100 — 0
[0249] Table VI shows the great convenience of using the hammer mill screw, because the state of the art discloses, in general, screws that obtain 75% humidity in the end product at a power of 1 kW for every 100 kg of dry matter, which means that 300 liters of water have to be evaporated with an caloric energy cost of 224 kW to obtain the dry matter. The high efficiency hammer mill screw 166 achieves a range of between 30% and 35% moisture in the material with 5.12 kW of power per 100 kg of product at equivalent dry matter and with a quantity of 43 liters of water to evaporate which is equivalent to 36 kW of heat energy. This means that the high efficiency hammer mill screw 166 in this case obtains a caloric energy saving of 184.12 kW.
[0250] Finally, a comparative chemical analysis of the pellets produced by the process closest to the state of the art (PCT/CL2017/00009) and the pellets produced by the present development was carried out, as can be seen in the following Table VII:
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE VII Solid-liquid Product Product separation obtained obtained according to through through the Publication application process of the Parameter Unit of Dung or Raw Number WO PCT/CL2017/ present measured measurement Material 2015086869 A1 00009 development Higher Calorific (kcal/kg) 3,906 3,602 4,545 4,550 Power Lower Calorific (kcal/kg) 3,639 3,350 4,228 4,219 Power Lignin (%) 24.7 NS 28 35.6 Cellulose and (%) 45 NS 67.97 62.7 hemicellulose Particle size (mm) 10-0.595 (67% NS 2-0.595 (84% 0.595-0.297 (72% of particles) of particles) of particles) Total Humidity (%) 8.58 6.18 6.52 6.96 Ash (%) 24.13 24.55 4.03 1.7 RAW MATERIAL COMPOUNDS Sulphur (%) 0.29 0.21 0.11 0.14 Carbon (%) 37.76 36.45 46.62 50.23 Hydrogen (%) 5.14 4.84 6.07 5.97 Nitrogen (%) 2.35 0.91 0.61 0.44 Oxygen (%) 29.99 32.98 41.17 NS Mn (Manganese) (ppm) 295 245 78.81 51 As (Arsenic) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 <0.01 Pb (Lead) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 12.2 Cu (Copper) (ppm) 109 <50 <50 13.23 Cr (Chromium) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 3.13 Cd (Cadmium) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 <0.01 Mo (Molybdenum) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 7.42 Hg (Mercury) (ppb) 1.0 NS NS 1.2 Ni (Nickel) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 2.98 V (Vanadium) (ppm) 55 75 <50 2.03 Co (Cobalt) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 <0.01 Zn (Zinc) (ppm) 131 53 <50 29.49 Sb (Antimony) (ppm) <50 <50 <50 <0.01 Cl (Chlorine) (ppm) 3445.88 740.63 100 70 ASH COMPOUNDS SiO.sub.2 (%) 2.93 7.02 2.89 1.21 Other Compounds (%) 53.18 53.98 45.75 19.29 TOTAL (%) 56.11 61 48.64 20.5
[0251] Based on the results shown above, we show below in Table I the ranges for higher calorific value, lower calorific value, total humidity and relevant toxic compounds expected from the product generated by the method of the present development:
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE I Unit Range Higher Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 4200-5700 Lower Calorific Power (kcal/kg) 4000-5300 Total Humidity (w/w %) 1-10 Ash (w/w %) 0-3 Sulphur (w/w %) .sup. 0-0.2 Nitrogen (w/w %) .sup. 0-0.5 Particle Size (mm) 0.595-0.297
[0252] Where (w/w %) corresponds to percentage in dry weight.