METHOD OF REFINING RAFFINATE-2

Abstract

A method for separating and refining 1-butene with a high purity and a high yield from a raffinate-2 stream. The method includes: feeding raffinate-2 to a first distillation column; obtaining heavy raffinate-3 from a lower part of the first distillation column; recovering an upper part fraction containing 1-butene from an upper part of the first distillation column; feeding the upper part fraction containing 1-butene to a second distillation column; recovering a first lower part fraction rich in 1-butene from a lower part of the second distillation column and light raffinate-3 from an upper part of the second distillation column. Heat of the upper part fraction recovered from the upper part of the first distillation column is fed to the lower part of the second distillation column through a first heat exchanger. Thus, 1-butene is obtained with high purity and high yield while maximizing an energy recovery amount by double-effect distillation.

Claims

1. A method of refining raffinate-2 comprising: feeding a raffinate-2 containing n-butane, isobutane, and 1-butene to a first distillation column; obtaining heavy raffinate-3 containing n-butane from a lower part of the first distillation column; recovering an upper part fraction containing 1-butene from an upper part of the first distillation column; feeding the upper part fraction containing 1-butene to a second distillation column; recovering a first lower part fraction rich in 1-butene from a lower part of the second distillation column and a light raffinate-3 containing isobutane from an upper part of the second distillation column, wherein heat of the upper part fraction recovered from the upper part of the first distillation column is fed to the lower part of the second distillation column through a first heat exchanger.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the raffinate-2 fed to the first distillation column contains isobutene and 1-butene at a weight ratio (isobutene/1-butene) of 0.006 or less.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein an operating pressure of the second distillation column is 4.7 kgf/cm.sup.2 or more.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein an operating pressure of the first distillation column is higher than an operating pressure of the second distillation column by 3.5 kgf/cm.sup.2 or more.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the upper part fraction of the first distillation column is fed with heat through the first heat exchanger to a second lower part fraction recovered from the lower part of the second distillation column, a portion of the upper part fraction of the first distillation column passed through the first heat exchanger is fed as a feed stream to the second distillation column, and a remaining portion of the upper part fraction of the first distillation column passed through the first heat exchanger is refluxed to the upper part of the first distillation column.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the second lower part fraction of the second distillation column that is fed with heat through the first heat exchanger is refluxed to the second distillation column.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein a portion of the first lower part fraction of the second distillation column is reheated and then refluxed.

8. The method of claim 5, wherein all of the upper part fraction of the first distillation column is fed to the first heat exchanger, and a separate condenser is not provided in the upper part of the first distillation column.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the heavy raffinate-3 recovered from the lower part of the first distillation column is reheated, and is recovered after being used to preheat the raffinate-2 fed to the first distillation column through a second heat exchanger.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein a portion of the heavy raffinate-3 that is reheated after being recovered from the lower part of the first distillation column is refluxed.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0021] FIG. 1 is a flow chart for explaining a separation step of a C4 mixture according to the related art.

[0022] FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0023] FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a process according to Comparative Example.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0024] Hereinafter, a method according to the present invention is described with reference to FIG. 2. However, FIG. 2 is only an example, and thus it should not be construed as limiting the protection scope of the present invention which is obvious from the claims and throughout the specification.

[0025] The present invention relates to a method for economically separating and refining 1-butene with a high purity and a high yield from a raffinate-2 stream discharged from a separation process of a C4 mixture.

[0026] In the method according to the invention, raffinate-2 may be all commercially available C4 hydrocarbon mixtures having 1-butene, n-butane, and isobutene. Suitable isobutene-based C4 streams, may be, for example, those obtained in a post-treatment of the stream, such as, those obtained by a refiner, a cracker (e.g. a steam cracker, a cat cracker), Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, dehydrogenation of butane, skeleton isomerization of linear butene, and metathesis of olefins.

[0027] FIG. 2 illustrates a method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

[0028] The method of refining raffinate-2 according to the present invention includes:

[0029] feeding a raffinate-2 10 containing n-butane, isobutane, and 1-butene to a first distillation column C1 to obtain heavy raffinate-3 13 containing n-butane from a lower part of the first distillation column C1 and to recover an upper part fraction 12 containing 1-butene from an upper part of the first distillation column; and

[0030] feeding the upper part fraction 12 containing 1-butene to a second distillation column C2 to recover a first lower part fraction 21 rich in 1-butene from a lower part of the second distillation column C2 and to recover light raffinate-3 22 containing isobutane from an upper part of the second distillation column,

[0031] wherein heat of the upper part fraction 12 recovered from the upper part of the first distillation column C1 is fed to the lower part of the second distillation column C2 through a first heat exchanger E1.

[0032] Here, the raffinate-2 10 fed to the first distillation column C1 preferably contains isobutene and 1-butene at a weight ratio (isobutene/1-butene) of 0.006 or less. This is because 1-butene is not easily separated in a refinement process since 1-butene has almost the same boiling point as isobutene (the boiling point of isobutene is −6.9□ and the boiling point of 1-butene is −6.24□) and it was found that when the ratio of isobutene/1-butene in a feed is higher than 0.0006, it is difficult to design the refinement process, and in severe cases, there is a problem in that it is not possible to manufacture products.

[0033] Further, an operating pressure of the second distillation column C2 is preferably 4.7 kgf/cm.sup.2 or more, and an operating pressure of the first distillation column is preferably higher than an operating pressure of the second distillation column by 3.5 kgf/cm.sup.2 or more. This is because it was found that a condensation temperature of the first distillation column is advantageous for double-effect distillation (DEC) which allows to have pressure sufficient to heat the second distillation column. The preferred range thereof is 3.5 to 5.5 kgf/cm.sup.2, or 3.5 to 5.0 kgf/cm.sup.2, or 4.0 to 5.5 kgf/cm.sup.2 or 4.0 to 5.0 kgf/cm.sup.2.

[0034] The upper part fraction 12 of the first distillation column C1 may be fed with heat to the second lower part fraction 23 recovered from the lower part of the second distillation column C2 through the first heat exchanger E1, a portion 12-1 of the upper part fraction of the first distillation column may be fed with a feed stream to the second distillation column C2, and the remainder 12-2 may be refluxed to the upper part of the first distillation column C1.

[0035] Further, the second lower part fraction 23 of the second distillation column C2 that is fed with heat through the first heat exchanger E1 is refluxed to the second distillation column C2.

[0036] Further, a portion 25 of the first lower part fraction 21 of the second distillation column C2 may be reheated and then refluxed to the second distillation column C2.

[0037] It is advantageous to divide the lower part fraction of the second distillation column C2 into the first lower part fraction 21 and the second lower part fraction 23 and inject each divided fraction into the heat exchanger since it is usable when all of the heat quantities required for start-up for an initial process and the second distillation column in a reheater b2 are not capable of being fed.

[0038] According to an embodiment, all of the upper part fraction 12 of the first distillation column C1 may be fed to the first heat exchanger E1, and a separate condenser may not be provided in the upper part of the first distillation column C1. In other words, the condenser may be omitted by double-effect distillation (DEC) using the first heat exchanger.

[0039] The heavy raffinate-3 11 recovered from the lower part of the first distillation column C1 may be reheated, used to preheat the raffinate-2 10 fed to the first distillation column C1 through a second heat exchanger E2, and then recovered.

[0040] Here, a portion 15 of the heavy raffinate-3 that is reheated after being recovered from the lower part of the first distillation column C1 may be refluxed.

[0041] The method according to the present invention has recovered heat quantity of 6 Gcal/hr or more, thus resulting in very good energy saving effect.

MODE FOR INVENTION

[0042] Hereinafter, Examples of the present invention are described.

Example 1

[0043] Refinement was performed using raffinate-2 having properties described in Table 1 below and employing the process illustrated in FIG. 2, except that preheating (E2) of raffinate-2 was not performed.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Component Mass Frac. C3's 0.48% C4 paraffin 29.18% Butene-1 43.73% Isobutene 0.25% C4 olefin 25.94% C5's 0.42% Sum 100.00%

Example 2

[0044] Refinement of raffinate-2 was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, except that preheating (E2) of raffinate-2 was performed as illustrated in FIG. 2.

Example 3

[0045] Refinement of raffinate-2 was performed in the same manner as in Example 2, except that a difference in operating pressure between the heavy end elimination column C1 and the light end elimination column C2 was 5.5 kgf/cm.sup.2.

Comparative Example 1

[0046] The refinement process was performed by using the same raffinate-2 as in Example 1, but not applying double-effect distillation as shown in FIG. 3.

Comparative Example 2

[0047] The refinement process was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, except that a ratio of isobutene/1-butene in raffinate-2 was 1% and a difference in operating pressure between the heavy end elimination column C1 and the light end elimination column C2 was 1.1 kgf/cm.sup.2.

Comparative Example 3

[0048] The refinement process was performed in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that a ratio of isobutene/1-butene in raffinate-2 was 0.6% and the operating pressure of the light end elimination column C2 was reduced to 4 kgf/cm.sup.2.

Comparative Example 4

[0049] The refinement process was performed in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that a ratio of isobutene/1-butene in raffinate-2 was 0.6% and a difference in operating pressure between the heavy end elimination column C1 and the light end elimination column C2 was 2.1 kgf/cm.sup.2.

[0050] Table 2 shows comparison results of specific operating conditions and energy recovery rates of Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 4.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Feed Iso-butene/ 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Condition Butene-1 (%) Heavy Upper Part 5.7 5.7 5.7 8.7 10.1 10.1 12.1 End Cut Pressure Column (kgf/cm.sup.2) Upper Part 51.8 51.8 51.8 67.1 73.1 73.1 80.8 Temperature (□) Feed 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 60.7 40.0 Temperature (□) Cond. Q 5.27 5.27 5.27 6.07 6.51 6.55 7.25 (Gcal/hr) Reb. Q 5.40 5.40 5.40 6.30 6.78 6.69 7.58 (Gcal/hr) Light Upper Part 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 End Cut Pressure Column (kgf/cm.sup.2) Upper Part 51.3 51.3 35.3 51.3 51.3 51.3 51.3 Temperature (□) Lower Part 61.9 61.9 46.8 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 Temperature (□) Product Spec. Spec. Spec. Spec. Spec. Spec. Spec. Purity (%) in Out in in in in in Cond. Q 5.92 5.92 3.84 6.40 6.72 6.71 7.52 (Gcal/hr) Reb. Q 5.94 5.94 3.81 6.37 6.68 6.67 7.45 (Gcal/hr) Energy Process- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.51 6.55 7.25 Comparison recovered Heat (Gcal/hr) Heat Used 11.21 11.21 5.27 12.44 6.72 6.71 7.52 for CW (Gcal/hr) Heat Used for 0.00 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Refrigerant (Gcal/hr) Total Q 11.34 11.34 9.21 12.67 6.95 6.81 7.78 (Gcal/hr) Saving Rate — 0.00 18.78 −11.73 38.71 39.95 31.39 (%)

[0051] It could be appreciated from the above-described results that when the weight ratio of isobutene/1-butene in the raffinate-2 to be fed was more than 0.006 (0.6%), it was not possible to satisfy the product specification (99.9% or more) (Comparative Example 2), and when the operating pressure of the light end elimination column (C2) was reduced, thus resulting in an increase of the refrigerant cost and an increase in the energy cost (Comparative Example 3).

[0052] In addition, it could be appreciated that when the difference in pressure of the upper part between the heavy end elimination column C1 and the light end elimination column C2 was less than 3.5 kgf/cm.sup.2, it was not possible to achieve heat exchange according to double-effect distillation (Comparative Example 4).

[0053] On the other hand, it could be appreciated that in Examples 1 to 3 that the difference in pressure of the upper part between the heavy end elimination column C1 and the light end elimination column C2 was 3.5 kgf/cm.sup.2 or more, and thus the heat exchange was achieved, and 6 Gcal/hr of heat could be recovered, thereby obtaining an energy saving rate of 30% or more. In addition, it could be appreciated that when the pressure difference was 5.5 kgf/cm.sup.2, the energy saving rate was slightly reduced, and thus the optimum pressure difference was in the range of 3.5 to 5.5 kgf/cm.sup.2.

[0054] Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and specific portions of the contents of the present invention have been described in detail. Thus, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that these specific descriptions are merely preferred embodiments and that the scope of the invention is not limited thereto. Therefore, the substantial scope of the present invention is defined by the accompanying claims and equivalents thereof.