METHOD FOR PRODUCING METAL COMPONENTS AND METAL COMPONENT PRODUCED IN THIS WAY
20220016693 · 2022-01-20
Inventors
- Sven CHRISTOPH (Weisendorf/Nürnberg, DE)
- Martin HAAKE (Erlangen, DE)
- Bernd RÖDER (Neuenmarkt, DE)
- Sergio COCCHI (Bedizzole, IT)
- Lorenzo ZAVARISE (Brescia, IT)
- Stefano COCCHI (Mazzano, IT)
Cpc classification
B21J5/002
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21J1/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B21J1/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21J5/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for producing metal components, consisting at least partially of a copper alloy, comprising the following alloy components in wt. %: 0 wt. %<Sn≤8 wt. %; 0 wt. %<Zn≤6 wt. %; 0.1 wt. %≤S≤0.7 wt. %; optionally no more than 0.2 wt. % phosphorus; optionally no more than 0.1 wt. % antimony; and optionally iron, zirconium and/or boron alone or in a combination of two or more of said elements of no more than 0.3 wt. %; and unavoidable impurities, and the rest being copper. The method comprises the following stages: (a) melting the copper alloy: (b) producing press blanks from the copper alloy; and (c) pressing the press blanks at a suitable pressing temperature to form the metal components. The invention also relates to a metal component which has been produced according to a method of this type.
Claims
1. A method for producing metal components which consist at least in part of a copper alloy that comprises the following alloy components in wt. %:
0 wt. %<Sn<8 wt. %;
0 wt. %<Zn<6 wt. %;
0.1 wt. %<S<0.7 wt. %; optionally no more than 0.2 wt. % phosphorus; optionally no more than 0.1 wt. % antimony; and optionally iron, zirconium and/or boron alone or in a combination of two or more of said elements no more than 0.3 wt. %; and unavoidable impurities, and copper for the remainder; wherein the method comprises the following steps: (a) melting the copper alloy; (b) producing press blanks from the copper alloy; and (c) pressing the press blanks at a suitable pressing temperature to form the metal components.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the proportion of sulfur in the alloy is 0.20 wt. %<S<0.65 wt. %, in particular 0.23 wt. %<S<0.45 wt. %, and preferably 0.25 wt. %<S<0.35 wt. %.
3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the proportion of zinc in the alloy is 1.3 wt. %<Zn<3.5 wt. %, preferably 1.5 wt. %<Zn<3.3 wt. %, and particularly preferably 2.0 wt. %<Zn<3.0 wt. %.
4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the proportion of phosphorus in the alloy is 0.015 wt. %<P<0.1 wt. %, in particular 0.02 wt. %<P<0.08 wt. %, and preferably 0.04 wt. %<P<0.06 wt. %.
5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the content of the proportion of tin in the alloy is 3.0 wt. %<Sn<4.8 wt. %, preferably 3.0 wt. % to 4.5 wt. %, and particularly preferably 3.5 wt. % to 4.0 wt. %.
6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that copper is contained in the lead-free copper alloy in a quantity of greater than 90 wt. %.
7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pressing temperature in step (c) is in a range of from 750° C. to 900° C., preferably in a range of from 800° C. to 880° C., and particularly preferably in a range of from 815° C. to 850° C.
8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the press blanks are heated to the pressing temperature before step (c) and are kept at the pressing temperature over a period of time of from 0.1 seconds to 60 minutes, preferably of from 2 seconds to 10 minutes.
9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the copper alloy in the component has a structure having an average grain size of less than 100 μm in a region close to the surface after the pressing process.
10. A metal component, produced according to a method according to claim 1.
11. The metal component according to claim 10, characterized in that the copper alloy in the component has a structure having an average grain size of less than 100 μm in a region close to the surface after the pressing process.
12. The metal component according to claim 10, characterized in that the component has a wall thickness at least in portions in the range of from 0.5 mm to 6.0 mm, preferably in the range of from 1.0 mm to 4.0 mm.
13. The metal component according to claim 9, characterized in that the metal component is a component for media-carrying gas or water pipes, in particular a fitting or valve for drinking water pipes.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
LABORATORY TEST OF THE FORMING BEHAVIOR
[0043] In order to simulate the forming behavior, closed-die-forging tests were carried out on a laboratory scale. A pipe having the dimensions 23 mm×8 mm was used as the starting material. The semi-finished product was produced from a copper alloy in a continuous casting process, with the proportions of the components in the copper alloy being stated in wt. % in table 1 below.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Alloy composition Alloy Cu Zn Pb Sn P S Fe Ni Si Sb Al 1 94.2 1.4 0.02 3.87 0.04 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[0044] The half-moon-shaped test bodies were produced by slices having a thickness of approximately 5 mm being cut from the pipe and the slices being cut through the center. The test bodies thus obtained were placed into the die with the round side at the top. The die is a cube-shaped tool made of solid steel. It has a cross-shaped cut-out on the upper face, and the test body to be tested was placed into this cut-out.
[0045] The test body received in the die was placed into a furnace for the heating time stated in table 2 and was heated therein to the forming temperature also stated in table 2. For the forming, the test body received in the die was removed from the furnace, placed on an anvil, and was formed by being struck with a sledgehammer having a mass of 5 kg. The number of hammer strikes is stated in table 2. Owing to the half-moon-shaped geometry and the cut-out in the internal diameter of the pipe, forming took place in every case. After the forming, the sample was cooled with water in order to conserve and evaluate the resulting state of the structure. The formed samples were then metallographically prepared and evaluated in the region of the forming. The grain sizes were determined in accordance with DIN EN ISO 2624 using the linear intercept method.
[0046] The test conditions are summarized in table 2 below:
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Test conditions Forming Heating Number Sample temperature time of strikes number [° C.] [min] (deformation) 1 800 90 2 2 800 30 1 3 830 75 1 4 830 75 1 5 860 65 1 6 860 65 — 7 800 60 — 8 800 60 — 9 830 60 — 10 830 60 — 11 860 60 — 12 860 60 — 13 600 60 — 14 600 60 — 15 600 60 1 16 600 60 1 17 700 60 1 18 700 60 1 19 700 60 — 20 700 60 — 21 950 60 1 22 950 60 1 23 950 60 1 24 950 60 —
[0047] In the tests, it was possible to establish that very positive forming properties became apparent in the range between 800 and 860° C. and that the described fine-grain formation took place. If the temperatures were in a lower range, hardly any further forming would be obtained. If they were in a higher range, fused points and reticulated sulfide agglomerates would be visible.
[0048]
Investigation of a Pressed Component with Regard to the Grain-Size Distribution
[0049] In order to simulate the producibility of a pressed component in an actual manufacturing process, some typical components of a drinking water installation were manufactured. Inter alia, a wall bracket was produced, which is shown in the photograph according to
[0050] The copper alloy used for pressing the wall bracket had the proportions of the components stated in wt. % in table 3 and table 4 below.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Alloy composition Alloy Cu Zn Pb Sn P S Fe Ni Si Sb Al 2 94.9 1.6 0.05 3.2 0.01 0.19 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Other alloy compositions Alloy Cu Zn Pb Sn P S Fe Ni Remainde 3 95.1 1.5 0.01 3.1 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.03 4 95.1 1.6 0.01 3.0 0.04 0.25 0.02 0.01 0.04 5 95.2 1.6 0.01 2.9 0.03 0.24 0.02 0.01 0.03 6 95.1 1.6 0.01 3.0 0.02 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.04 7 93.6 1.6 0.02 4.5 0.01 0.24 0.02 0.01 0.04 8 93.8 1.6 0.01 4.0 0.03 0.43 0.01 0.01 0.04 9 95.4 1.3 0.01 3.0 0.01 0.16 0.01 0.01 0.03 10 95.5 1.3 0.01 3.0 0.01 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.03 11 94.5 1.3 0.01 3.9 0.02 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.03 12 94.7 1.2 0.01 3.9 0.01 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.03 13 94.3 1.5 0.01 3.9 0.03 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.04 14 93.9 1.5 0.02 4.1 0.04 0.46 0.01 0.00 0.03 15 93.9 1.5 0.02 4.0 0.02 0.46 0.01 0.00 0.03 16 94.0 1.5 0.02 4.0 0.02 0.46 0.01 0.00 0.02 17 92.4 3.1 0.02 4.0 0.04 0.43 0.02 0.00 0.03 18 92.4 3.0 0.02 4.0 0.04 0.43 0.02 0.00 0.03 19 94.9 1.6 0.01 3.0 0.05 0.44 0.01 0.00 0.02 20 95.3 1.3 0.01 2.9 0.02 0.46 0.01 0.00 0.03 21 95.4 1.2 0.01 2.9 0.01 0.45 0.01 0.00 0.02
[0051] For the production of the wall bracket, continuously cast bars were produced from the above-mentioned material and were cut to length to form press blanks. The press blanks were then heated to a pressing temperature of approximately 830° C. in a preheating furnace. From the preheating furnace, the heated blanks were then slid into a preheated die in which the components were produced by closing the die.
[0052] The pressed parts thus obtained were then cooled. In a final step, the components underwent final processing and were provided with a through-hole and a thread.
[0053]
[0054] This demonstrates that the material hardness in the deformed regions can be significantly increased as a rule. In the present example, in the collar region (see position 1 in
[0055] For the other lead-free copper alloys from table 4, components pressed according to the invention having likewise improved properties, such as the material hardness in the deformed regions, are obtained.
Determining the Corrosive Behavior of a Copper Alloy in Contact with an Aqueous Medium of Components Produced in a Closed-Die-Forging Process
[0056] In order to evaluate the corrosion resistance, components produced using closed die forging were subjected to an artificial-ageing test, as described in the laid-open publication DE 10 2017 100896 A1.
[0057] For these artificial-ageing tests, a lead-free copper alloy was used, inter alia, with the proportions of the individual alloy components being stated in wt. % in table 5 below.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Alloy composition Alloy Cu Zn Pb Sn P S Fe Ni Si Sb Al 22 94.78 1.66 0.00 3.27 0.01 0.20 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00
[0058] In order to produce test bodies, a 16 Rp ½ wall bracket for on-site use was manufactured from the alloy. The mechanical processing of the components took place under near-series conditions. To do this, the surfaces were manufactured to have comparable roughness depths, for example. In order to obtain the test bodies, the components were then cut in half. The surface of the test bodies was cleaned with acetone. In order to generate a zero level for the measurement, the components were then coated on the underside and were cleaned once more in the uncoated test region. The test bodies were then inserted into a test container so as to hang freely. The test containers were then placed into a heating cabinet at 90° C. for five months, with the test medium being changed at intervals of seven days.
[0059] Twenty-one different aqueous test media or test waters having different pHs and acid capacities were used as test media. Furthermore, different contents of chloride ions and/or sulfate ions were set by the addition of sodium chloride and/or sodium sulfate. The contents can be found in table 6.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Carbonate Water hardness Chloride Sulfate number pH in °dH in mg/l in mg/l 1 9 0.5 10 — 2 9 0.5 100 — 3 9 0.5 250 — 4 9 0.5 1000 — 5 8 1.5 15 — 6 8 1.5 60 — 7 8 1.5 140 — 8 8 3.0 30 — 9 8 3.0 100 — 10 8 5.5 80 — 11 8 5.5 120 — 12 8 5.5 250 — 13 7 9.0 100 — 14 7 9.0 160 — 15 7 14.0 140 — 16 7 18.0 40 — 17 7 18.0 100 — 18 7 18.0 250 — 19 9 0.5 250 250 20 8 5.5 250 250 21 7 18.0 250 250
[0060] After the five-month test period, the test containers were removed from the heating cabinet and cooled to room temperature, the test bodies were removed from the respective test containers, were dried and cut open, and the cut surface was inspected with a light microscope after corresponding processing.
[0061] By comparison with a component cast from alloy 22, a component hot-pressed from alloy 22 exhibits yet further improved attack resistance. This is primarily justified by the denser structure. Because there are no shrink holes and no porosity, the medium acts on the hot-pressed component from the surface in a planar manner and very quickly forms a protective, adhering, closed cover layer. As in the cast component, this layer is virtually free of faults or defects and therefore imparts its full protection by preventing any attack at the bottom of any porosity.
[0062]
[0063] In the above, the present invention has been described with reference to examples and comparative examples; however, it is clear to a person skilled in the art that the invention is not restricted to these examples, but instead the scope of the present invention results from the accompanying claims.