VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
20220017119 · 2022-01-20
Assignee
Inventors
- Yuki Tanaka (Tokyo, JP)
- Tatsuya Horiguchi (Tokyo, JP)
- Teppei Hirotsu (Tokyo, JP)
- Hideyuki SAKAMOTO (Hitachinaka-shi, JP)
Cpc classification
G06F11/07
PHYSICS
B60W2050/0031
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W50/035
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G07C5/0816
PHYSICS
B60W50/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60W60/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W50/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Provided is an automatic driving system based on a model predictive control, the automatic driving system where, in an event of a failure of an actuator, identification between a real vehicle and a vehicle model is simplified. Based on information regarding the failure of the actuator, the automatic driving system updates a spot in the vehicle model, the spot corresponding to the spot of failure detected, to a fixed value, and causes an actuator control device for the actuator, where the failure is detected, to fix a command value that is overwritten in accordance with a state of the actuator. With this configuration, the identification between the real vehicle and the vehicle model is simplified.
Claims
1. A vehicle control system comprising: an automatic driving control device configured to plan a behavior of a vehicle based on a behavior model of the vehicle; actuators formed as a group, each of the actuators included in the vehicle; and actuator control devices formed as a group, each of the actuator control devices configured to determine a method to drive a corresponding one of the actuators based on the behavior of the vehicle planned by the automatic driving control device, the vehicle control system comprising the steps of: when a failure is detected in each of the actuators and/or each of the actuator control devices, updating a spot in the vehicle model, the spot corresponding to a spot of the failure detected, to a fixed value based on failure information regarding the spot of the failure detected; and transmitting a command value to cause the spot of the failure detected to be in a state corresponding to the fixed value.
2. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a deceleration device controlled by a corresponding one of the actuator control devices.
3. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a steering angle control device controlled by a corresponding one of the actuator control devices.
4. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a drive device controlled by a corresponding one of the actuator control devices.
5. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a model pattern control unit that includes patterns of updating the behavior model.
6. The vehicle control system according to claim 5, wherein in a case where each of the actuators does not exist and in a case where each of the actuators is in the state corresponding to the fixed value, a behavior model is newly generated, and the behavior model newly generated is included as one of the patterns of updating the behavior model.
7. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein based on the behavior model updated, the behavior of the vehicle is predicted, and the command value for each of the actuators is determined.
8. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, further comprising a failure detection unit configured, when the failure occurs in each of the actuators, to detect the spot of the failure and a state of the failure.
9. The vehicle control system according to claim 8, further comprising a failure notification unit configured, when the failure occurs in each of the actuators, to notify the actuator control devices and the automatic driving control device of the state of the failure.
10. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein a command is transmitted to each of the actuator control devices for controlling a corresponding one of the actuators where the failure is detected, the command to cause the corresponding one of the actuators to transit to a pause state.
11. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein a command is transmitted to each of the actuator control devices for controlling a corresponding one of the actuators where the failure is detected, the command to fix a state of the corresponding one of the actuators at an initial value.
12. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein a command is transmitted to each of the actuator control devices where the failure is detected, the command to fix a state of a corresponding one of the actuators.
13. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein each of the actuators where the failure is detected is caused to transit to a pause state.
14. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein when the failure is detected, a service workshop and/or a driver are/is to be notified of the failure.
15. The vehicle control system according to claim 1, wherein an operational amount of each of the actuators, where the failure is detected, is fulfilled by any other one of the actuators.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0009]
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0018] An example of a preferred embodiment (embodiment) of the present invention will be described below. This embodiment mainly describes a vehicle control system and a vehicle control device, each included in a vehicle system. Thus, this embodiment is preferably used for the vehicle system, but is not limited thereto. This embodiment may be applied to other systems in addition to the vehicle system.
First Embodiment
[0019] <Configuration of Vehicle System>
[0020]
[0021] <Configuration of Automatic Driving ECU>
[0022] Various forms of technology to automatically drive automobiles are increasingly feasible. Many forms of the technology to automatically drive automobiles are feasible by use of a computer control device.
[0023] In a model predictive control used for the automatic driving, a command value generator 313 generates an operational command value; based on the operational command value, a model control unit 314 predicts a behavior of the vehicle; and based on a result predicted, an evaluation unit 315 evaluates the operational command value.
[0024] Here, an embedded OS 316 is used as an operating system. A hardware 302 includes a CPU 331, a memory 332, a timer 333, a network adaptor 334, and a peripheral 335. The timer 333 is configured to provide timing for real-time control; the network adaptor 334 is configured to access the network; and the peripheral 335 is, for example, the sensor for monitoring the surrounding environment or the automatic brake.
[0025] <Model Predictive Control>
[0026] The model predictive control is a control method based on a behavior model to be controlled. Here, a model modeling the behavior of the vehicle to be controlled is created and held. Then the model (behavior model) is used to predict the behavior of the vehicle with respect to an operation of each of the actuators. With this configuration, the operational command value optimized for driving as planned is searched.
[0027]
[0028] <Vehicle Model>
[0029] An example of the vehicle model will be described with reference to
x.sub.t+1=x.sub.t+v.sub.tΔt cos θ sin φ−v.sub.tΔt sin θ sin(φ+90°)−(½)aΔt.sup.2 cos θ sin φ−(½)aΔt.sup.2 sin θ sin(φ+90°)−(vt.sup.2/L)Δt sin θ sin(φ+90°)−(a.sup.2/2l)Δt.sup.2 sin θ sin(φ+90°) (1)
y.sub.t+1=y.sub.t+v.sub.tΔt cos θ cos φ−v.sub.tΔt sin θ cos(φ+90°)−(½)aΔt.sup.2 cos θ cos φ−(½)aΔt.sup.2 sin θ cos(φ+90°)−(vt.sup.2/L)Δt sin θ cos(φ+90°)−(a.sup.2/2l)Δt.sup.2 sin θ cos(φ+90°) (2)
v.sub.t+1=v.sub.t+aΔt (3)
φ.sub.t+1=φ.sub.t+(v.sub.t/L)Δt sin θ+(a/L)Δt.sup.2 sin θ cos φ (4)
[0030] <Vehicle Control System>
[0031] An example of a configuration of a vehicle control system will be described with reference to
[0032] When any one of the actuators fails, a failure notification device 101 transmits failure information to the automatic driving ECU. Based on the failure information, the automatic driving ECU 202 updates the model control unit 314; and based on the model updated, a command value fixing device 103 fixes the control command value for the corresponding actuator.
[0033] <VMC (Vehicle Motion Controller)>
[0034] An example of a flow operated by the VMC 102 will be described with reference to
[0035] <Failure Notification Device>
[0036] When any one of the actuators 111, 112, 113, 114, 121, 122, 123, 124, and 131 fails, the failure notification device 101 notifies the automatic driving ECU 202 of status of the failure.
[0037] <Model Control Unit>
[0038] An example of a flow operated by the model control unit 314 in the model predictive control will be described with reference to
[0039] Still alternatively, when any other one of the actuators is capable of covering for the operation of the actuator in failure, the control command value for the actuator in failure may be held as the fixed value, and concurrently, the vehicle model may be updated such that any other one of the actuators continues the operation in place of the actuator in failure.
[0040] <Effect of Embodiment>
[0041] According to the embodiment described above, in the automatic driving system based on the model predictive control, when any one of the failures causes a gap to occur between the behavior of the vehicle and the behavior model (vehicle model), the control command value for the real vehicle is fixed, and the vehicle model is updated based on the control command value fixed. With this configuration, it is possible, when any one of the actuators fails, to simplify system identification between the real vehicle and the vehicle model without being required of any complicated operation. Accordingly, in this embodiment, when any one of the failures occurs, it is possible to match the real behavior of the vehicle with the behavior model (vehicle model) even on a low-priced ECU; and thus, it is possible to continue to travel in accordance with the vehicle model updated.
Second Embodiment
[0042] <Patterning of Vehicle Model>
[0043] A second embodiment according to the present invention will be described with reference to
[0044] <Effect of Embodiment>
[0045] According to the embodiment described above, the patterns for updating the vehicle model are previously prepared. With this configuration, it is possible, when any one of the actuators fails, to simplify determination on the candidate pattern for updating the vehicle model; and thus, it is possible to reduce load for the system identification.
Third Embodiment
[0046] <Model Predictive Control Based on Control Command Value>
[0047] A third embodiment according to the present invention will be described. In an example of this embodiment, the control command value is used as a candidate command value for the model predictive control. Here, operations of the vehicle and performance of the actuators are used for the vehicle model. In addition to the equations (1) to (4) previously described, the acceleration a and the angular speed θ are obtained based on an operational amount of each of the actuators. When each of Pfr, Pfl, Prr, and Prl represents an operational amount of the corresponding powertrain wheel, each of Bfr, Bfl, Brr, and Brl represents an operational amount of the corresponding brake wheel, and S represents an operational amount of the steering, the acceleration a and the angular speed θ are expressed by equations below.
a=(P.sub.fr-B.sub.fr)+(P.sub.fl-B.sub.fl)+(P.sub.rr-Brr)+(P.sub.rl-B.sub.rl) (5)
θ=S+((P.sub.fr-B.sub.fr)−(P.sub.fl-B.sub.fl)+(P.sub.rr-B.sub.rr)−(P.sub.rl-B.sub.rl)) (6)
[0048] The automatic driving ECU 202 generates a candidate control command value for each of the actuators, and predicts the behavior of the vehicle based on the vehicle model. The VMC 102 acquires a control command value determined, confirms whether or not the control command value determined is feasible for each of the actuators 111 to 114, 121 to 124, and 131, and transmits the control command value determined to the corresponding actuator ECU 104, 105, and 106.
[0049] <Effect of Embodiment>
[0050] According to the embodiment described above, the control command value for each of the actuators is used to the search for the model predictive control. With this configuration, it is possible to continue to travel in a more stable manner.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0051] 101 failure notification device [0052] 102 VMC [0053] 103 command value fixing device [0054] 104 brake ECU [0055] 105 powertrain ECU [0056] 106 steering ECU [0057] 111 front right brake [0058] 112 front left brake [0059] 113 rear right brake [0060] 114 rear left brake [0061] 121 front right powertrain [0062] 122 front left powertrain [0063] 123 rear right powertrain [0064] 124 rear left powertrain [0065] 131 steering [0066] 201 vehicle system [0067] 202 automatic driving ECU [0068] 203 wireless communication unit [0069] 204 drive device [0070] 205 recognition device [0071] 206 output device [0072] 207 input device [0073] 301 software [0074] 302 hardware [0075] 311 application unit [0076] 312 shared data control unit [0077] 313 command value generator [0078] 314 model control unit [0079] 315 evaluation unit [0080] 316 OS [0081] 321 sensor fusion system [0082] 322 map fusion system [0083] 323 ADAS [0084] 324 auto parking system [0085] 325 route planning system [0086] 331 CPU [0087] 332 memory [0088] 333 timer [0089] 334 network adaptor [0090] 335 peripheral