Pneumatic tire
11179970 · 2021-11-23
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60C11/1236
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2257
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2200/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2025
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/229
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2016
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2011/0358
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C9/2204
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C9/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2019
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/0306
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2011/0383
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2032
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/1204
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2295
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2009/2029
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C9/2009
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2011/0344
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02T10/86
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
B60C11/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C9/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A pneumatic tire includes a carcass layer and belt layers including belt cords inclined with respect to a circumferential direction, the belt cords of different layers being arranged in a criss-cross manner. In at least one belt layer, an inclination angle α of the belt cords with respect to the circumferential direction at a center position and an inclination angle β of the belt cords with respect to the circumferential direction at a belt end position satisfy 15°≤β<α≤35°. A maximum ground contact length L1 and a ground contact length L2 satisfy 0.8≤L2/L1≤1.0, where L1 is the maximum ground contact length in the circumferential direction, W1 is a maximum ground contact width in a radial direction, and L2 is the ground contact length in the circumferential direction at a position 40% of W1 from the center position outward in a lateral direction.
Claims
1. A pneumatic tire, comprising: a carcass layer mounted between a pair of bead portions; and two belt layers disposed outward of the carcass layer in a tire radial direction in a tread portion, the two belt layers each comprising a plurality of belt cords inclined with respect to a tire circumferential direction, the plurality of belt cords of different of the belt layers being arranged in a criss-cross manner; in at least one of the two belt layers, an inclination angle α of the plurality of belt cords with respect to the tire circumferential direction at a tire center position and an inclination angle β of the plurality of belt cords with respect to the tire circumferential direction at a belt end position satisfying a relationship 15°≤β<α≤35°; and a maximum ground contact length L1 and a ground contact length L2 satisfying a relationship 0.8≤L2/L1≤1.0, where, with the pneumatic tire inflated to an air pressure of 240 kPa, loaded with a load 75% of standards-specified maximum load capacity, and brought into contact with a ground, L1 is the maximum ground contact length in the tire circumferential direction, W1 is a maximum ground contact width in a tire lateral direction, and L2 is the ground contact length in the tire circumferential direction at a position 40% of the maximum ground contact width W1 from the tire center position outward in the tire lateral direction; wherein the at least one belt layer compries a centrally located large-angle region where an inclination angle of the plurality of belt cords is in a range α±1° and a small-angle region on a shoulder side where an inclination angle of the plurality of belt cords is in a range β±1°; and a width of the large-angle region is ½ or greater of an entire width of the at least one belt layer, and a width of the small-angle region is ⅛ or greater of the entire width of the at least one belt layer.
2. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein a difference between the inclination angle α and the inclination angle β is 3° or greater.
3. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, further comprising a belt reinforcing layer disposed outward of the at least one belt layer in the tire radial direction, the belt reinforcing layer being disposed covering the large-angle region of the at least one belt layer.
4. The pneumatic tire according to claim 3, wherein the belt reinforcing layer comprises at least two belt reinforcing layers.
5. The pneumatic tire according to claim 3, wherein a plurality of main grooves extending in the tire circumferential direction are formed in the tread portion, the plurality of main grooves comprising at least one center main groove and a pair of shoulder main grooves located outward on either side of the center main groove; and the belt reinforcing layer extends outward in the tire lateral direction beyond the pair of shoulder main grooves, and a distance d in the tire lateral direction from an end position of the belt reinforcing layer to a corresponding shoulder main groove is 50% or greater of an opening width D of the corresponding shoulder main groove.
6. The pneumatic tire according to claim 3, wherein the at least one belt layer comprises a transition region between the large-angle region and the small-angle region, the transition region including a change in angle of the plurality of belt cords; and the belt reinforcing layer is disposed covering the large-angle region and the transition region of the at least one belt layer.
7. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the two belt layers each comprise the large-angle region and the small-angle region.
8. The pneumatic tire according to claim 7, wherein the two belt layers each comprise a transition region between the large-angle region and the small-angle region, the transition region including a change in angle of the plurality of belt cords; and the transition region of the belt layer located inward and the transition region of the belt layer located outward are offset from one another in the tire lateral direction.
9. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the pneumatic tire is a tire for a passenger vehicle with an aspect ratio of 65% or less.
10. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, further comprising a belt reinforcing layer disposed outward of the at least one belt layer in the tire radial direction, covering the at least one belt layer; and a rigidity of the belt reinforcing layer in the tire circumferential direction per unit width is higher in an inner region than an outer region in the tire lateral direction.
11. The pneumatic tire according to claim 10, wherein a difference between the inclination angle α and the inclination angle β is 3° or greater.
12. The pneumatic tire according to claim 10, wherein in the belt reinforcing layer, a cord count of band cords per unit width is greater in the inner region than in the outer region in the tire lateral direction.
13. The pneumatic tire according to claim 10, wherein, in the belt reinforcing layer, band cords disposed in the inner region in the tire lateral direction have a higher rigidity than band cords disposed in the outer region in the tire lateral direction.
14. The pneumatic tire according to claim 10, wherein in the belt reinforcing layer, an inclination angle of band cords with respect to the tire circumferential direction ranges from 0° to 30°; and the inclination angle of the band cords with respect to the tire circumferential direction gradually increases from inward to outward in the tire lateral direction.
15. The pneumatic tire according to claim 10, wherein the pneumatic tire is a tire for a passenger vehicle with an aspect ratio of 65% or less.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(13) Configurations of embodiments of the present technology are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
(14) As illustrated in
(15) A carcass layer 4 is mounted between the pair of bead portions 3,3. The carcass layer 4 includes a plurality of carcass cords extending in the tire radial direction and is folded back around bead cores 5 disposed in each of the bead portions 3 from a tire inner side to a tire outer side. A bead filler 6 having a triangular cross-sectional shape formed from rubber composition is disposed on the outer circumference of the bead core 5.
(16) A plurality of belt layers 7 are embedded on an outer circumferential side of the carcass layer 4 in the tread portion 1. The belt layers 7 each include a plurality of belt cords that are inclined with respect to the tire circumferential direction with belt cords of the different layers being arranged in a criss-cross manner. Steel cords are preferably used as the belt cords of the belt layers 7. A belt reinforcing layer 8, formed by arranging band cords at an angle of, for example, not greater than 5° with respect to the tire circumferential direction, is disposed on an outer circumferential side of the belt layers 7. The belt reinforcing layer 8 preferably has a jointless structure in which a strip material made from at least a single band cord laid out and covered with rubber is wound continuously in the tire circumferential direction. Nylon, aramid, or similar organic fiber cords are preferably used as the band cords of the belt reinforcing layer 8.
(17) As illustrated in
(18) As illustrated in
(19) By employing a structure in which the inclination angle β of the belt cord C at the belt end position BE is smaller than the inclination angle α of the belt cord C at the tire center position CL, rigidity in the tire circumferential direction of the end portion of the belt layer 7 can be increased and uneven wear in the shoulder region of the tread portion 1 can be suppressed. In particular, by setting the difference between the inclination angle α and the inclination angle β to 3° or greater, an effect of suppressing uneven wear in the shoulder region of the tread portion 1 can be sufficiently produced. When the inclination angle β is less than 15°, the rigidity in the tire circumferential direction in the shoulder region of the tread portion 1 is excessive. When the inclination angle α is greater than 35°, the rigidity in the tire circumferential direction in the center region of the tread portion 1 is too low, causing the ground contact length in the center region to be excessively long.
(20) As illustrated in
(21)
(22) The contact patch shape set in this manner in accordance with the ratio L2/L1 of the maximum ground contact length L1 and the ground contact length L2 in the shoulder region is given a generally rectangular shape. This allows uneven wear in the center region of the tread portion 1 to be suppressed and prevents rolling resistance from being degraded. As a result, rolling resistance can be reduced and uneven wear in the shoulder region and the center region of the tread portion 1 can be effectively suppressed. When the ratio L2/L1 is less than 0.8, uneven wear in the center region of the tread portion 1 cannot be sufficiently suppressed and rolling resistance may be degraded. When the ratio L2/L1 is greater than 1.0, uneven wear may occur in the shoulder region of the tread portion 1.
(23) To appropriately set the ratio L2/L1 (rectangular ratio) of the maximum ground contact length L1 and the ground contact length L2 as described above, the pneumatic tire is provided with a belt reinforcing layer 8 disposed outward of the belt layer 7 in the tire radial direction, and the belt reinforcing layer 8 is disposed locally covering the large-angle region Ac of the belt layer 7. By disposing the belt reinforcing layer 8 outward of the belt layer 7 in the tire radial direction in this manner, the ground contact length of the center region of the tread portion 1 is suppressed from being excessive and the contact patch shape is made appropriate. This allows uneven wear in the center region of the tread portion 1 to be suppressed and rolling resistance to be prevented from degrading. This effect can be significantly obtained by disposing two or more belt reinforcing layers 8 on top on one another, locally covering the large-angle region Ac of the belt layer 7.
(24)
(25) As described above, the width Lc of the large-angle region Ac is ½ or greater of the entire width L of the belt layer 7, and the width Ls of the small-angle region As is ⅛ or greater of the entire width L of the belt layer 7. Accordingly, a width Lx of the transition region Ax disposed between the large-angle region Ac and the small-angle region As is ⅛ or less of the entire width L of the belt layer 7. Additionally, an inclination angle γ of the belt cord C with respect to the tire circumferential direction in the transition region Ax, together with the inclination angles α, β, satisfies the relationship β<γ<α.
(26) In the pneumatic tire, the two belt layers 7 each preferably include the centrally located large-angle region Ac and the small-angle regions As on the shoulder sides. In this configuration, the rigidity of the tread portion 1 is appropriately set in accordance with the two belt layers 7. This allows uneven wear in the shoulder regions of the tread portion 1 to be more effectively suppressed.
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30) As described above, so that the ratio L2/L1 (rectangular ratio) of the maximum ground contact length L1 and the ground contact length L2 satisfies the relationship 0.8≤L2/L1≤1.0 and more preferably the relationship 0.85≤L2/L1≤0.95, in the pneumatic tire, the belt reinforcing layer 8 is disposed covering all of the belt layer 7 in the tire lateral direction and rigidity in the tire circumferential direction per unit width is set higher in the inner region in the tire lateral direction than in the outer region. In other words, by appropriately setting a cross-sectional area S (mm.sup.2) of the band cord of the belt reinforcing layer 8, an elastic modulus E (kN/mm.sup.2) of the band cord, the cord count N (cords/50 mm) of the band cords per 50 mm width of the belt reinforcing layer 8, and an inclination angle θ (°) of the band cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction, a rigidity G (kN/50 mm) in the tire circumferential direction per unit width of the belt reinforcing layer 8 is adjusted depending on the position in the tire lateral direction. The rigidity G in the tire circumferential direction per unit width of the belt reinforcing layer 8 is, for example, calculated via G=S×E×N×cos.sup.4θ. The rigidity G per unit width of the belt reinforcing layer 8 in the outer region in the tire lateral direction preferably ranges from 15 kN/50 mm to 30 kN/50 mm, and the rigidity Gin the inner region in the tire lateral direction is preferably higher.
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34) In the embodiments described above, the inner region Ai of the belt reinforcing layer 8 with relatively high rigidity is preferably disposed covering the large-angle region Ac of the belt layer 7. In an embodiment in which the belt layer 7 includes a transition region Ax between a large-angle region Ac and small-angle region As, the inner region Ai of the belt reinforcing layer 8 with the relatively high rigidity can be disposed across the transition region Ax of the belt layer 7.
(35)
(36) A preferred embodiment of the pneumatic tire described above is a tire for a passenger vehicle with an aspect ratio of 65% or less. Such a tire for a passenger vehicle can achieve reduced rolling resistance and enhanced uneven wear resistance.
EXAMPLES
(37) Pneumatic tires according to Conventional Example 1, Comparative Example 1, and Examples 1 to 7 were manufactured with a tire size of 205/55R16 91V and including a carcass layer mounted between a pair of bead portions, two belt layers disposed outward of the carcass layer in the tire radial direction in the tread portion, and a belt reinforcing layer disposed outward of the two belt layers in the tire radial direction. The belt layer structure, the belt reinforcing layer structure, and the rectangular ratio of the contact patch shape were set as indicated in Table 1.
(38) In Conventional Example 1, a typical belt layer in which the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position and inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position are identical was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (full cover) that covers all of the belt layer.
(39) In Comparative Example 1, a belt layer including a large-angle region, a transition region, and a small-angle region and having an inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position being less than the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (full cover+edge cover) that covers all of the belt layer.
(40) In Example 1, a belt layer including a large-angle region, a transition region, and a small-angle region and having an inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position being less than the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (full cover) that covers all of the belt layer. In Examples 2 to 6, a belt layer including a large-angle region, a transition region, and a small-angle region and having an inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position being less than the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (center cover) that locally covers the large-angle region of the belt layer (or a region including the large-angle region and the transition region).
(41) In Table 1, the boundary position between the large-angle region and the transition region of the belt layers, the boundary position between the transition region and the small-angle region, and the outer end position are indicated as distances from the tire center position in the tire lateral direction. In a similar manner, the outer end position of the belt reinforcing layer is indicated as a distance from the tire center position in the tire lateral direction. Additionally, the rectangular ratio of the contact patch shape is calculated by L2/L1×100%, where the maximum ground contact length in the tire circumferential direction is L1, the maximum ground contact width in the tire lateral direction is W1, and the ground contact length in the tire circumferential direction at a position 40% of the maximum ground contact width W1 from a tire center position outward in the tire lateral direction is L2, when the pneumatic tire is inflated to an air pressure of 240 kPa, loaded with a load 75% of the standards-specified maximum load capacity, and brought into contact with the ground.
(42) The test tires were evaluated for uneven wear resistance (shoulder region, center region) and rolling resistance according to the following evaluation method, and the results are shown in Table 1.
(43) Uneven Wear Resistance (Shoulder Region, Center Region):
(44) The test tires were each mounted on a wheel with a 16×6.5 J rim size and then on a friction energy measuring tester. The average friction energy was measured for the shoulder region and the center region of the tread portion at an air pressure of 230 kPa and a load of 4.5 kN. The measurement value for each region was the average friction energy measured at four locations, two locations 10 mm apart in the tire lateral direction and two locations 10 mm apart in the tire circumferential direction. For the evaluation result for the uneven wear resistance in the shoulder region, the reciprocals of the measurement values are expressed as index values with Conventional Example 1 being assigned the index value of 100, and for the uneven wear resistance in the center region, the reciprocals of the measurement values are expressed as index values with Comparative Example 1 being assigned the index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior uneven wear resistance.
(45) Rolling Resistance:
(46) The test tires were each mounted on a wheel with a 16×6.5 J rim size and then on a drum testing machine. The rolling resistance was measured in accordance with ISO (International Standards Organization) 25280 at an air pressure of 210 kPa and a load of 4.82 kN. The evaluation results are expressed as index values using the reciprocal of the measurement values, with Comparative Example 1 being assigned the index value of 100. Higher index values indicate lower rolling resistance.
(47) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Conventional Comparative Example 1 Example 1 Example 1 Example 2 Inclination angle α of belt cord at 26 26 26 26 tire center position (°) Inclination angle β of belt cord at 26 18 18 24.5 belt end position (°) Outer belt Boundary position — 45 45 45 layer between large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position — 53 53 53 between transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position 80 80 80 80 (mm) Inner belt Boundary position — 45 45 45 layer between large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position — 53 53 53 between transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position 85 85 85 85 (mm) Outer end position of belt 85 85 85 45 reinforcing layer (mm) Number of belt reinforcing layers (1) 1 1 1 above large-angle region Number of belt reinforcing layers (1) 1 1 0 above transition region Number of belt reinforcing layers (1) 2 1 0 above small-angle region Rectangular ratio of contact patch 90 75 80 88 shape (%) Uneven wear resistance in shoulder 100 120 120 110 region (index value) Uneven wear resistance in center 125 100 110 120 region (index value) Rolling resistance (index value) 120 100 105 120 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Inclination angle α of belt cord at 26 26 26 26 26 tire center position (°) Inclination angle β of belt cord at 23 18 18 18 18 belt end position (°) Outer belt Boundary position 45 45 45 45 45 layer between large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position 53 53 53 53 53 between transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position 80 80 80 80 80 (mm) Inner belt Boundary position 45 45 45 45 50 layer between large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position 53 53 53 53 58 between transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position 85 85 85 85 85 (mm) Outer end position of belt 45 45 45 53 58 reinforcing layer (mm) Number of belt reinforcing layers 1 1 2 2 2 above large-angle region Number of belt reinforcing layers 0 0 0 2 2 above transition region Number of belt reinforcing layers 0 0 0 0 0 above small-angle region Rectangular ratio of contact patch 85 85 90 90 90 shape (%) Uneven wear resistance in shoulder 115 120 120 120 120 region (index value) Uneven wear resistance in center 120 115 125 125 125 region (index value) Rolling resistance (index value) 120 115 120 120 120
(48) As can be seen from Table 1, the tires of Examples 1 to 7 have excellent uneven wear resistance in the shoulder region compared to Conventional Example 1. Also, the tires of Examples 1 to 7 have excellent uneven wear resistance in the center region and good rolling resistance compared to Comparative Example 1.
(49) Next, pneumatic tires according to Conventional Example 11, Comparative Example 11, and Examples 11 to 17 were manufactured with a tire size of 205/55R16 91V and including a carcass layer mounted between a pair of bead portions, two belt layers disposed outward of the carcass layer in the tire radial direction in the tread portion, and a belt reinforcing layer disposed outward of the two belt layers in the tire radial direction. The belt layer structure, the belt reinforcing layer structure, and the rectangular ratio of the contact patch shape were set as indicated in Table 2.
(50) In Conventional Example 11, a typical belt layer in which the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position and inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position are identical was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (full cover) that covered all of the belt layer.
(51) In Comparative Example 11, a belt layer including a large-angle region, a transition region, and a small-angle region and having an inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position being less than the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (full cover) that covered all of the belt layer.
(52) In Examples 11 to 17, a belt layer including a large-angle region, a transition region, and a small-angle region and having an inclination angle β of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the belt end position being less than the inclination angle α of the belt cord with respect to the tire circumferential direction at the tire center position was used, as well as a belt reinforcing layer (
(53) In Table 2, the boundary position between the large-angle region and the transition region of the belt layers, the boundary position between the transition region and the small-angle region, and the outer end position are indicated as distances from the tire center position in the tire lateral direction. Additionally, the rectangular ratio of the contact patch shape is calculated by L2/L1×100%, where the maximum ground contact length in the tire circumferential direction is L1, the maximum ground contact width in the tire lateral direction is W1, and the ground contact length in the tire circumferential direction at a position 40% of the maximum ground contact width W1 from a tire center position outward in the tire lateral direction is L2, when the pneumatic tire is inflated to an air pressure of 240 kPa, loaded with a load 75% of the standards-specified maximum load capacity, and brought into contact with the ground.
(54) The test tires were evaluated for uneven wear resistance (shoulder region, center region) and rolling resistance according to the following evaluation method, and the results are shown in Table 2.
(55) Uneven Wear Resistance (Shoulder Region, Center Region):
(56) The test tires were each mounted on a wheel with a 16×6.5 J rim size and then on a friction energy measuring tester. The average friction energy was measured for the shoulder region and the center region of the tread portion at an air pressure of 230 kPa and a load of 4.5 kN. The measurement value for each region was the average friction energy measured at four locations, two locations 10 mm apart in the tire lateral direction and two locations 10 mm apart in the tire circumferential direction. For the evaluation result for the uneven wear resistance in the shoulder region, the reciprocals of the measurement values are expressed as index values with Conventional Example 11 being assigned the index value of 100, and for the uneven wear resistance in the center region, the reciprocals of the measurement values are expressed as index values with Comparative Example 11 being assigned the index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior uneven wear resistance.
(57) Rolling Resistance:
(58) The test tires were each mounted on a wheel with a 16×6.5 J rim size and then on a drum testing machine. The rolling resistance was measured in accordance with ISO 25280 at an air pressure of 210 kPa and a load of 4.82 kN. The evaluation results are expressed as index values using the reciprocal of the measurement values, with Comparative Example 11 being assigned the index value of 100. Higher index values indicate lower rolling resistance.
(59) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Conventional Comparative Example Example Example Example 11 11 11 12 Inclination angle α of belt cord at tire center 26 26 26 26 position (°) Inclination angle β of belt cord at belt end 26 18 18 18 position (°) Outer belt layer Boundary position between — 45 45 45 large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position between — 53 53 53 transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position (mm) 80 80 80 80 Inner belt layer Boundary position between — 45 45 45 large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position between — 53 53 53 transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position (mm) 85 85 85 85 Belt reinforcing layer structure Uniform Uniform FIG. 9 FIG. 11 Cord count of belt reinforcing layer in inner 50 50 50 50 region (cords/50 mm) Cord count of belt reinforcing layer in outer 50 50 25 50 region (cords/50 mm) Cord material of belt reinforcing layer in Nylon Nylon Nylon Nylon/ inner region aramid Cord material of belt reinforcing layer in Nylon Nylon Nylon Nylon outer region Inclination angle of band cord at tire center 0 0 0 0 position (°) Inclination angle of band cord at reinforcing 0 0 0 0 layer end position (°) Rectangular ratio of contact patch shape (%) 90 75 85 90 Uneven wear resistance in shoulder region 100 120 120 120 (index value) Uneven wear resistance in center region 125 100 115 125 (index value) Rolling resistance (index value) 120 100 115 120 Example Example Example Example Example 13 14 15 16 17 Inclination angle α of belt cord at tire center 26 26 26 26 26 position (°) Inclination angle β of belt cord at belt end 18 18 18 24.5 23 position (°) Outer belt layer Boundary position between 45 45 45 45 45 large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position between 53 53 53 53 53 transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position (mm) 80 80 80 80 80 Inner belt layer Boundary position between 45 45 45 45 45 large-angle region and transition region (mm) Boundary position between 53 53 53 53 53 transition region and small- angle region (mm) Outer end position (mm) 85 85 85 85 85 Belt reinforcing layer structure FIG. 10 FIG. 12 FIG. 10 FIG. 9 FIG. 9 Cord count of belt reinforcing layer in inner 50 50 50 50 50 region (cords/50 mm) Cord count of belt reinforcing layer in outer 40 50 40 25 25 region (cords/50 mm) Cord material of belt reinforcing layer in Nylon/ Nylon Nylon Nylon Nylon inner region aramid Cord material of belt reinforcing layer in Nylon Nylon Nylon Nylon Nylon outer region Inclination angle of band cord at tire center 0 0 0 0 0 position (°) Inclination angle of band cord at reinforcing 0 20 0 0 0 layer end position (°) Rectangular ratio of contact patch shape (%) 93 85 80 90 88 Uneven wear resistance in shoulder region 120 120 120 110 115 (index value) Uneven wear resistance in center region 130 120 115 125 120 (index value) Rolling resistance (index value) 125 115 110 120 120
(60) As can be seen from Table 2, the tires of Examples 11 to 17 have excellent uneven wear resistance in the shoulder region compared to Conventional Example 11. Also, the tires of Examples 11 to 17 have excellent uneven wear resistance in the center region and good rolling resistance compared to Comparative Example 11.