1. Patent Search
  2. Details

Firefighting water garment

11179583 · 2021-11-23

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A firefighting water garment consists of a reinforced cotton fabric with combing manufactured through weaving of doubled yarn with loose end with an area weight approximately 346 g/m2 which is able to absorb up to six-times more liquid than it weights. The fabric is soaked with a water solution that consists of 50% of water, at least, of 2.7 to 50% of extinguishing agent and of 1 to 10% of a component reflecting heat radiation. Another necessary component is powder titanium dioxide which reflects heat radiation perfectly. Evaporation of water from the suit occurs under presence of fire, and the water starts to cool surface of the fabric and thus prevents overheating of the organism. This way marked extension of time for suit exposure in the fire and prevention of rise of dangerous burns on skin is achieved.

    Claims

    1. A firefighting water garment characterised by the fact that it consists of a cotton fabric soaked with a solution for the firefighting water garment where the cotton fabric with combing has a area weight of 100 to 500 g/m.sup.2 and the suspension consists of at least 50% of water, 2.7 to 50% of a water soluble soaking agent and 1 to 10% of titanium dioxide or zinc oxide where each 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric is soaked with at least 300 ml of the suspension.

    2. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the cotton fabric has an area weight from 300 to 400 g/m.sup.2.

    3. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the cotton fabric has been combed.

    4. The firefighting water garment according to claims 2 and 3 characterised by the fact that it consists of the cotton fabric with combing with an area weight from 330 to 370 g/m.sup.2.

    5. The firefighting water garment according to claims 2 and 3 characterised by the fact that each 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric is soaked with at least 1 l of the suspension.

    6. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the water soluble soaking agent is any extinguishing agent or surfactant.

    7. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the extinguishing agent is a mixture of hydro-carbons and fluorated surface active substances of a AFFF range.

    8. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric is soaked with at least 2 l of the suspension.

    9. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the solution for the firefighting water garment consists of at least 60% of water, at least 20% of soaking agent, and at least 5% of titanium dioxide or zinc oxide.

    10. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the solution for the firefighting water garment consists of 92% of water, 3% of soaking agent and 5% of titanium dioxide or zinc oxide.

    11. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the solution for the firefighting water garment consists of 50% of water, 45% of soaking agent and 5% of titanium dioxide or zinc oxide.

    12. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that the fabric consists of warp ends marked TEX/pk 25 1 AIBD and of doubled weft threads marked TEX/pk 72 1 AIBD.

    13. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that it is shaped like a frock.

    14. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that it is a veil with straps.

    15. The firefighting water garment according to claim 1 characterised by the fact that it consists of two layers of the cotton fabric with combing soaked with the solution for the firefighting water garment.

    16. Utilisation of the firefighting water garment according to claim 1 for an evacuation from a life-threatening fire.

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    (1) FIG. 1: Firefighting suit

    (2) FIG. 2: Firefighting veil

    (3) FIG. 3: Suit packed in an airtight package

    (4) FIG. 4: Operation of solution with soaking agent a) Initial weighting of fabric b) Submerging of fabric in solution c) Final weighting of fabric

    (5) FIG. 5: Firefighting test of suit pursuant to standard ISO 13506:2008 a) Suit dressed on dummy b) Burning burners

    (6) FIG. 6: Assessment of firefighting test of suit—data from sensors positioned on dummy

    (7) FIG. 7: Chart of assessment of firefighting test of suit—temperature dependence of level of burn

    (8) FIG. 8: Presentation of test—resilience against limited propagation of flame on square of fabric

    (9) FIG. 9: Presentation of test—Long effect of radiant heat

    (10) FIG. 10: Chart of time dependence of temperature presenting behaviour of fabric soaked with solutions of different composition, A: veil soaked with solution according to Example 3b: 66.67% water, 30% extinguishing agent, 3.33% TiO.sub.2, B: suit soaked with solution according to Example 2a: 67.5% water, 22.5% extinguishing agent, 10% TiO.sub.2, C: suit soaked with solution according to Example 2b: 92% water, 2.76% extinguishing agent, 5.24% TiO.sub.2

    EXAMPLES

    Example 1

    (11) a) Manufacture of Fabric and Sewing of Veil with Single Weave, 2 Threads in a Single Heddle

    (12) The fabric has been manufactured in a weaving loom of pure cotton yarn that has consisted of warp ends marked TEX/pk 25 1 AIBD and of filling picks marked TEX/pk 72 1 AIBD where TEX=mass of single thread with length 1000 m, pk=yarn quality, AI=quality and BD=loose end. First 4920 warp ends per a warp beam have been prepared, they have been roved in pairs between wires in the reed and they also have been inserted in pairs into each eye of a heddle, thus 2460 heddles have been placed and 2460 wires have been placed in the reed. The reed number has been 150 wires per 10 cm. The weaving process has run as follows: first all odd heddles have been raised and a filling pick has been guided through the shed using pneumatic pick. Then all even heddles have been raised and the filling pick has been picked in the opposite direction. 3000 rows of filling picks have been picked in total.

    (13) The thickness of the manufactured fabric has been approximately 0.5 mm and the area weight of the fabric in the loom-finished condition has been about 271 g/m.sup.2. The raw width has been 154 cm and the reed width has been 164 cm. The strength of the warp fabric has been 340 and the strength of the weft fabric has been 918, thus the specific strength of the raw fabric has been 629. The fabric has been combed on both sides subsequently and its final area weight has been 231 g/m.sup.2 and the thickness of the picked fabric has been 0.8 mm.

    (14) From the fabric prepared in this way an active cooling extinguishing and evacuation veil has been sewn with dimensions of 150×170 cm and weight 750.8 g. The veils applicable for evacuation of persons have also been fitted with strips for easier holding in corners on one side.

    (15) b) Manufacture of Fabric and Sewing of Veil, 2 Threads in Single Heddle

    (16) The fabric has been manufactured in a weaving loom of pure cotton yarn that has consisted of warp ends marked TEX/pk 25 1 AIBD and of filling picks marked TEX/pk 72 1 AIBD, where TEX=mass of single thread with length 1000 m, pk=yarn quality, AI=quality and BD=loose end. First 4920 warp ends per a warp beam have been prepared, they have been roved in pairs between wires in the reed and they also have been inserted in pairs into each eye of a heddle, thus 2460 heddles have been placed and 2460 wires have been placed in the reed. The reed number has been 150 wires per 10 cm. The weaving process has run as follows: first all odd heddles have been raised and a filling pick has been guided through the shed using pneumatic pick. Then all even heddles have been raised and the filling pick has been picked in the opposite direction. 3000 rows of filling picks have been picked in total.

    (17) The thickness of the manufactured fabric has been about 1 mm and the area weight of the fabric in the loom-finished condition has been about 406 g/m.sup.2. The raw width has been 154 cm and the reed width has been 164 cm. The strength of the warp fabric has been 340 and the strength of the weft fabric has been 918, thus the specific strength of the raw fabric has been 629.

    (18) The fabric has been combed on both sides subsequently and its final area weight has been 346 g/m.sup.2 and the thickness of the picked fabric has been 1.6 mm. An active cooling extinguishing and evacuation veil with dimensions 150×140 cm and weight 550.8 g has been sewn of this way manufactured fabric.

    (19) c) Manufacture of the Fabric and Sewing of Two-Layered Veil for Extreme Use with Doubled Weft Weave, 1 Thread in 1 Heddle

    (20) The fabric has been manufactured in a weaving loom of pure cotton yarn that has consisted of warp ends marked TEX/pk 25 1 AIBD and of filling picks marked TEX/pk 72 1 AIBD, where TEX=mass of single thread with length 1000 m, pk=yarn quality, AI=quality and BD=loose end. First 4920 warp ends per a warp beam have been prepared, they have been roved in pairs between wires in the reed and one thread has been inserted in each hole in the heddles, thus 4920 heddles have been used and 2460 wires have been placed in the reed. The reed number has been 150 wires per 10 cm. The weaving process has run as follows: first all odd heddles have been raised and two filling picks have been guided through the shed using pneumatic pick. Then all even heddles have been raised and the filling picks have been picked in the opposite direction. 3000 rows of filling picks have been picked in total, two in each shed. The fabric with doubled weft weave has been manufactured, with thickness about 1 mm and its area weight in the loom-finished condition has been 406 g/m.sup.2. The raw width has been 154 cm and the reed width has been 164 cm. The strength of the warp fabric has been 340 and the strength of the weft fabric has been 918, thus the specific strength of the raw fabric has been 629. The fabric has been combed on both sides subsequently and its final area weight has been 346 g/m.sup.2 and the thickness of the picked fabric has been 1.6 mm.

    (21) From the fabric thus prepared, an active cooling extinguishing and evacuation veil has been sewn by sewing through two layers laying one on another with dimensions 150×180 cm. The final weight of the through-sewn two-layer veil has been 1550.8 g. Moreover the veil has been fitted with strips for easier holding in corners on one side, the final area weight of the sewn-through veil has been 630 g/m.sup.2 and the thickness has been 2.9 mm.

    (22) d) Manufacture of Fabric and Sewing of Suit for Professional Firemen with Doubled Filling Pick, 2 Threads in Single Heddle

    (23) The fabric has been manufactured in a weaving loom of pure cotton yarn that has consisted of warp ends marked TEX/pk 25 1 AIBD and of filling picks marked TEX/pk 72 1 AIBD, where TEX=mass of single thread with length 1000 m, pk=yarn quality, AI=quality and BD=loose end. First 4920 warp ends per a warp beam have been prepared, they have been roved in pairs between wires in the reed and they also have been inserted in pairs into each eye of a heddle, thus 2460 heddles have been placed and 2460 wires have been placed in the reed. The reed number has been 150 wires per 10 cm. The weaving process has run as follows: first all odd heddles have been raised and two filling picks have been guided through the shed using pneumatic pick. Then all even heddles have been raised and filling picks have been picked in the opposite direction. 3000 rows of filling picks have been picked in total two in each shed. The fabric with doubled weft and warp weave has been manufactured with thickness 1 mm and its area weight in the raw condition has been 406 g/m.sup.2. The raw width has been 154 cm and the reed width has been 164 cm. The strength of the warp fabric has been 340 and the strength of the weft fabric has been 918, thus the specific strength of the raw fabric has been 629.

    (24) The thickness of the manufactured fabric has been about 1 mm and the area weight of the fabric in the loom-finished condition has been about 406 g/m.sup.2. The raw width has been 154 cm and the reed width has been 164 cm. The strength of the warp fabric has been 340 and the strength of the weft fabric has been 918, thus the specific strength of the raw fabric has been 629. The fabric has been combed on both sides subsequently and its final area weight has been 346 g/m.sup.2 and the thickness of the picked fabric has been 1.6 mm.

    (25) A firefighting suit has been sewn of the fabric shaped like a frock with a hood fitted with velcro strips with weight 1100 g and area 3.18 m.sup.2 with area weight 346 g/m.sup.2.

    (26) e) Manufacture of Fabric and Sewing of Suit with Doubled Weft Weave, 1 Thread in 1 Heddle

    (27) The fabric has been manufactured in a weaving loom of pure cotton yarn that has consisted of warp ends marked TEX/pk 25 1 AIBD and of filling picks marked TEX/pk 72 1 AIBD, where TEX=mass of single thread with length 1000 m, pk=yarn quality, AI=quality and BD=loose end. First 4920 warp ends have been prepared, in two rows one above another in two warp beams, 2460 warp ends have been in each beam. They have been roved in pairs between wires in the reed and they have been inserted one by one into each eye of a heddle, thus 4920 heddles have been placed and 2460 wires have been placed in the reed. The reed number has been 150 wires per 10 cm. The weaving process has run as follows: first all odd heddles have been raised and two filling picks have been guided through the shed using pneumatic pick. Then all even heddles have been raised and filling picks have been picked in the opposite direction. 3000 rows of filling picks have been picked in total, two in each shed. The fabric with doubled weft weave has been manufactured with thickness about 1 mm and its area weight in the loom-finished condition has been 406 g/m.sup.2. The raw width has been 154 cm and the reed width has been 164 cm. The strength of the warp fabric has been 340 and the strength of the weft fabric has been 918, thus the specific strength of the raw fabric has been 629. The fabric has been combed on both sides subsequently and its final area weight has been 346 g/m.sup.2 and the thickness of the picked fabric has been 1.6 mm. A firefighting suit has been sewn of the fabric shaped like a frock with a hood fitted with velcro strips with weight 1100 g and area 3.18 m.sup.2 with area weight 346 g/m.sup.2.

    Example 2

    (28) a) Preparation of Solution and Impregnation of Suit: 67.5% Water, 22.5% Extinguishing Agent, 10% TiO.sub.2

    (29) 10.125 litres of water was poured into a clean vessel with capacity of 15 litres, 3.375 litres of extinguishing agent FireAde 2000 has been added in water. 1.5 kg of powder titanium dioxide marked Pretiox R200M of mineral rutile containing 99% of TiO.sub.2 and with density of 4.2 g/cm.sup.3 has been poured in the solution of water and of extinguishing agent under permanent stirring. The solution has been manually stirred for 4 minutes till it homogenized.

    (30) The suit shaped like a frock, manufactured of the fabric according to Example 1e has been submerged into the solution prepared for the period of 2 minutes, so that the solution would enter into the suit bulk. After this period has passed, the suit has been taken out from the vessel and it has been enclosed into air-tight package which has been a solid plastic bag fitted with a layer preventing penetration of sun radiation. The suit has soaked 6.482 litres of the solution which amounts to 2.038 litres of the solution per 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric, therefore the suit has had a wall of water 2 mm thick available.

    (31) b) Preparation of Solution and Impregnation of Suit for Professional Firemen: 92% Water, 2.76% Extinguishing Agent, 5.24% ZnO.sub.2

    (32) 13.8 litres of water has been poured into a clean vessel with capacity of 15 litres, 0.414 litres of extinguishing agent Fomtec has been added in water. 0.786 kg of powder zinc oxide containing 99% of ZnO.sub.2 and with density of 5.62 g/cm.sup.3 has been poured in the solution of water and of extinguishing agent under permanent stirring. The solution has been manually stirred for 2 minutes till it homogenized.

    (33) The suit shaped like a frock, manufactured of the fabric according to Example 1d has been submerged into the prepared solution for 2 minutes, so that the solution would enter into the suit bulk. After this time has passed, the suit has been taken out from the vessel and it has been enclosed into air-tight package which has been a solid plastic bag fitted with a layer preventing penetration of sun radiation. The suit has soaked 5.936 litres of the solution which amounts to 1.86 litres of the solution per 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric, therefore the suit has had a wall of water 2 mm thick available.

    Example 3

    (34) a) Preparation of Solution and Impregnation of Veil Particularly for Evacuation Purposes: 66.67% Water, 30% Extinguishing Agent, 3.33% TiO.sub.2

    (35) 10 litres of water has been poured into a clean vessel with capacity of 15 litres, 4.5 litres of extinguishing agent FireAde 2000 has been added in water. 0.5 kg of powder titanium dioxide marked Pretiox R200M of mineral rutile containing 99% of TiO.sub.2 and with density 4.2 g/cm.sup.3 has been poured in the solution of water and of extinguishing agent under permanent stirring. The solution has been manually stirred for 2 minutes till it homogenized.

    (36) An active cooling extinguishing and evacuation veil with dimensions 150×170 cm prepared according to Example 1a, fitted with handles in corners on one side for easier holding, has been submerged into the prepared solution for 2 minutes, so that the solution would enter into the veil bulk. After this time has passed, the veil has been taken out from the vessel and has been enclosed into air-tight package which has been a solid plastic bag fitted with a layer preventing penetration of sun radiation. The veil has soaked 2.212 litres of the solution which amounts to 0.867 litres of the solution per 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric, therefore the veil has had a wall of water 1 mm thick available.

    (37) b) Preparation of Solution and Impregnation of Veil Particularly to Extinguish Raising Fires: 47.5% Water, 47.5% Extinguishing Agent, 5% TiO.sub.2

    (38) 7.125 litres of water has been poured into a clean vessel with capacity of 15 litres, 7.125 litres of extinguishing agent Fomtec has been added in water. 0.75 kg of powder titanium dioxide marked Pretiox R200M of mineral rutile containing 99% of TiO.sub.2 and with density 4.2 g/cm.sup.3 has been poured in the solution of water and of extinguishing agent under permanent stirring. The solution has been manually stirred for 2 minutes till it homogenized.

    (39) An active cooling extinguishing veil with dimensions 150×140 cm prepared according to Example 1b, fitted with handles on one narrower side for easier holding has been submerged into the prepared solution for 2 minutes, so that the solution would enter into the veil bulk. After this time has passed, the veil has been taken out from the vessel and has been enclosed into air-tight package, which has been a solid plastic bag fitted with a layer preventing penetration of sun radiation. The veil has soaked 3.246 litres of the solution, which amounts to 1.546 litres of the solution per 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric, therefore the veil has had a wall of water 2 mm thick available.

    (40) c) Preparation of Solution and Impregnation of Veil for Heavy Duty in Industrial Objects: 76.5% Water, 13.15% Extinguishing Agent, 10% TiO.sub.2

    (41) 11.475 litres of water has been poured into a clean vessel with capacity of 15 litres, 2.025 litres of extinguishing agent FireAde 2000 has been added in water. 1.5 kg of powder zinc oxide containing 99% of ZnO.sub.2 and with density 5.62 g/cm.sup.3 has been poured in the solution of water and of extinguishing agent under permanent stirring. The solution has been manually stirred for 3 minutes till it homogenized.

    (42) An active cooling extinguishing and evacuation veil according to Example 1c has been submerged into the prepared solution for 4 minutes, so that the solution would enter into the veil bulk. After this time has passed, the veil has been taken out from the vessel and has been enclosed into air-tight package, which has been a solid plastic bag fitted with a layer preventing penetration of sun radiation. The veil has soaked 6.8545 litres of the solution, which amounts to 2.539 litres of the solution per 1 m.sup.2 of the fabric, therefore the veil has had a wall of water 3 mm thick available.

    Example 4

    (43) Test to Compare Soaking of Solutions into Fabric

    (44) Three vessels have been prepared, 200 ml of solution of water with Jar in ratio 1/3, thus one part of Jar and two parts of water, have been poured in the first vessel, 200 ml of solution with extinguishing agent FireAde 2000 and with titanium dioxide in ratio 1/3 thus one part of extinguishing agent and two parts of water and 5 g of titanium dioxide has been poured in the second vessel and 200 ml of pure water has been poured in the third vessel. The fabric manufactured according to Example 1d with dimensions 9×9 cm and with weight 2.8 g has been inserted into each vessel. The fabric has been immediately submerged in the first two solutions and it has soaked with them. In the third vessel, with water, the fabric has kept at the surface and it has not submerged, even under mechanic assistance. After 20 seconds of exposure in the vessels, the fabric has been taken out and weighted. The fabric taken out from water has weighted 5 g, the fabric taken out from the solution with soaking agent FireAde 2000 has weighted 19.3 g and the fabric taken out from water with Jar has weighted 13.4 g. This test has documented near incapability of water without soaking agent to soak into the fabric and 5 times increase of absorption of water with Jar and 7.5 times increase of absorption of water with FireAde 2000.

    Example 5

    (45) Test of Firefighting Resilience of Suit—Fireman

    (46) a) The firefighting water garment shaped like a firefighting suit and manufactured according to Example 2a has been subjected to a temperature test pursuant to standard ISO 13506:208. The firefighting suit has been dressed on a dummy and 135 sensors have been placed on its body, the sensors assess what amount of heat has passed through the suit and how extensive burns would occur, if any. 12 burners have been positioned around the dummy, in two rows six in each side. Six of them concentrated on the legs and body and the remaining 6 burners concentrated on the upper part of the body and the head. The test has run for 128 s, and the heat flow of burners has risen to 84 kW/m.sup.2 and temperature has been approximately 1200° C. The burners have been on for the period of 8 seconds. After the burners have been switched off, vapour has been visible, and it has evaporated gradually from the firefighting suit. The suit has stayed on the dummy for other 120 seconds. The suit has been checked after the test has finished, it has shown no impairment and no roasting of the fabric. The test has been performed three times in total.

    (47) Then assessment of data from the sensors and averaging data from all the three tests have followed. After 120 seconds, incidence of pain has been registered in 23.7%, caused in 1.8% by first degree burns and in 22.8% by second and third degree burns in the area of back and chest. In our case, these have been rather scalds than burns. According to the standard, the assessment has been evaluated as compliant and the firefighting suit has been assessed as suitable for use as the firefighting means.

    (48) b) The firefighting water garment shaped like a firefighting suit and manufactured according to Example 2a has been subjected to the temperature test pursuant to the standard ISO 13506:208. The firefighting suit has been dressed on a dummy and 135 sensors have been placed on its body, the sensors assess what amount of heat has passed through the suit and how extensive burns would be, if any. 12 burners have been positioned around the dummy, in two rows six each. Six of them concentrated on the legs and body, and the remaining 6 burners concentrated on the upper part of the body and the head. The test has run for 120 s, and the heat flow of burners has risen to 84 kW/m.sup.2 and temperature has been approximately 1200° C. The burners have been several times on for 8 seconds. After the burners have been switched off, vapour has been visible, and it has evaporated gradually from the firefighting suit. The suit has been checked after the test has finished, it has shown no impairment and no roasting of the fabric. The test has been performed three times in total.

    (49) Then assessment of data from the sensors and averaging data from all the three tests have followed. After 120 seconds, incidence of pain has been registered in 29%, caused in 5.3% by first degree burns and in 25% by second and third degree burns in the area of back and chest. In our case, these have been rather scalds than burns. According to the standard, the assessment has been evaluated as compliant and the firefighting suit has been assessed as suitable for use as the firefighting means.

    Example 6

    (50) Test on Firefighting Resilience of Veil

    (51) a) A firefighting veil sewn of the fabric according to Example 1b, and soaked with the solution prepared according to Example 3a, has been subjected to a temperature test. The veil has been pulled over a metal structure and a temperature sensor has been placed on the structure. A temperature burner has been positioned opposite to the veil and its temperature has been registered by another temperature sensor, positioned on the other side of the veil. The temperature burner has run for 20 seconds and then it has been switched off. The temperature of the flame has achieved 1000° C. The first sensor, positioned under the fabric, has registered temperature 73° C., without the fabric being impaired.

    (52) b) A firefighting veil sewn of the fabric according to Example 1b, and soaked with the solution prepared according to Example 3b, has been subjected to a temperature test. The veil has been pulled over a metal structure, on which a temperature sensor has been placed. A temperature burner has been positioned opposite to the veil and its temperature has been registered by another temperature sensor, positioned on the other side of the veil. The temperature burner has run for 20 seconds and then it has been switched off. The temperature of the flame has achieved 1000° C. The first sensor, positioned under the fabric, has registered temperature 70° C., without the fabric being impaired.

    (53) c) A firefighting veil sewn of the fabric according to Example 1a, and soaked with the solution prepared according to Example 3c, has been subjected to a temperature test. The veil has been pulled over a metal structure, on which a temperature sensor has been placed. A temperature burner has been positioned opposite to the veil and its temperature has been registered by another temperature sensor, positioned on the other side of the veil. The temperature burner has run for 20 seconds and then it has been switched off. The temperature of the flame has achieved 1000° C. after 10 seconds. The first sensor, positioned under the fabric, has registered temperature 68° C., without the fabric being impaired.

    Example 7

    (54) Test on Firefighting Resilience of Veil Manufactured According to Example 3b and Suits Manufactured According to Examples 2a and 2b Outdoor

    (55) The veil manufactured according to Example 3b, the suit manufactured according to Example 2a and the suit manufactured according to Example 2b have been subjected to a temperature test under direct action of flame. The veil and the suit have been pulled on a metal structure positioned outdoor. Gas burners with flame temperature 1100° C. have been placed opposite to the applied veil and suits. Temperature sensors have been positioned under the fabric to record temperature under the fabric. With a stop-watch on, the temperature on temperature sensors has been automatically recorded each 2 seconds, and the initial test temperature has been 20° C. The test has run for the period of 100 seconds in total. The temperature on temperature sensors has been put into graphs and assessed. The results of the test are presented in FIG. 10.

    (56) At the test start, the lowest temperature has been under the veil manufactured according to Example 3b. After 20 seconds of the test, the temperature sensor has registered temperature 50° C., and then the temperature has started to rise steeply and after 60 seconds the temperature reached 100° C.

    (57) At the test start, the temperature under the suit manufactured according to Example 2a has risen quickly to 68° C. and has kept constant for approximately 40 seconds, then the temperature has started to rise steeply.

    (58) The temperature under the suit manufactured according to Example 2b has risen to 70° C. after 20 seconds and has kept constant for 70 seconds, and then the temperature has started to rise steeply.

    INDEX LIST

    (59) 1 fabric 2 strap 3 vessel with pure water 4 vessel with water solution with extinguishing agent and titanium dioxide 5 vessel with water solution with Jar

    UTILITY OF PATENT

    (60) Firefighting means distinguished by high quality protection of persons and animals in case of fire.