NEUTRALISING ANTIBODY AGAINST DENGUE FOR USE IN A METHOD OF PREVENTION AND/OR TREATMENT OF ZIKA INFECTION

20210355167 · 2021-11-18

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A flavivirus Envelope Dimer Epitope (EDE) and isolated neutralizing antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof directed against the EDE for use in vaccinating an individual against one or more flaviviruses wherein the EDE is a stabilized recombinant flavivirus are provided. The dimer is: covalently stabilized with at least one disulphide inter-chain bond or one sulfhydryl-reactive crosslinker between the two sE monomers, and/or by being formed as a single polypeptide chain, and/or by linking the two sE monomers through modified sugar, and/or non-covalently stabilized by substituting at least one amino acid residue in the amino acid sequence of at least one sE monomer with at least one bulky side chain amino acid, at the dimer interface or in domain 1 (D1)/domain 3 (D3) linker of each monomer. The dimer is a homodimer or heterodimer of native and/or mutant envelope polypeptides, from DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, DENV-4, Zika and/or other flavivirus.

    Claims

    1-44. (canceled)

    45. An isolated neutralizing antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof directed against a flavivirus envelope dimer epitope (EDE) wherein the antibody or fragment comprises a CDR comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 15 to 26 and sequences with no more than 30% modificationfrom any one said SEQ ID No. 15 to 26 wherein the one or more flaviviruses is selected from zika virus; zika virus and dengue virus; zika virus and other flaviviruses; flaviviruses other than dengue, wherein: (a) said antibody or fragment thereof binds the five polypeptide segments of the dengue virus glycoprotein E ectodomain (sE) consisting of the residues 67-74, residues 97-106, residues 307-314, residues 148-159 and residues 243-251, or corresponding residues of the flavivirus or Zika virus glycoprotein E ectodomain, or consisting of Zika PF13 residues 67-77, residues 97-106, residues 313-315, residues 243-253 residue K373 or corresponding residues of the flavivirus glycoprotein E ectodomain, (b) binding is unaffected by presence or absence of dengue N153 (Zika N154) glycan or corresponding residue.

    46. (canceled)

    47 The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein it recognizes exclusively virion-dependent (including sub-viral particle or virus-like particle) epitope(s) of a flavivirus, optionally Zika or dengue virus.

    48. The fragment of claim 45 wherein it is a Fab fragment.

    49. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45, comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 15 to 26 and sequences with no more than 20, 15, or 10% modification from any one said SEQ ID No. 15 to 26.

    50. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein the EDE comprises a region centred in a valley lined by the b strand on the domain II side, and the “150 loop” on the domain I side (across from the diener interface), wherein the 150 loop spans residues 148-159, connecting b-strands E0 and F0 of domain I, and carries the N153 glycan, which covers the fusion loop of the partner subunit in the dimer, optionally wherein the region comprises the b strand (residues 67-74 which bear the N67 glycan), the fusion loop and residues immediately upstream (residues 97-106) and the ij loop (residues 246-249) of the reference subunit,erein the reference subunit is the subunit which contributes the fusion loop, optionally wherein the EDE further comprises the 150 loop and the N153 glycan chain of the second subunit, optionally wherein one or both regions is in a substantiallysimilar spatial configuration as the native region; or wherein the EDE comprises the Zika PF13 beta strand b of domain II, bed beta-sheet edge, fusion loop main chain, fusion loop R99 side chain, Q77 side chain, disulphide bond between C74 and C105; beta strand E, K373, charged residues in domain I, kl loop of domain II, or regions corresponding thereto.

    51. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45, wherein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises one or more serotypes of Dengue virus and/or Zika virus.

    52. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45, wherein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises all serotypes of Dengue virus and Zika virus.

    53. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein the antibody or fragmen f neutralises one or more serotypes of Dengue virus and/or Zika virus to 80, 90, 98 or 100% at a concentration of 0.5-0.01 μg/ml.

    54. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein the antibody or fragment f neutralises all serotypes of Dengue virus and Zika virus to 80, 90, 98 or 100% at a concentration of 0.5-0.01 ug/ml

    55. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein the fragment is a Fv fragment; a Fab-like fragment; or a domain antibody; or wherein the antibody is a monoclonal antibody or a recombinant antibody.

    56. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein the antibody is a polyclonal antibody or antigen binding portion thereof.

    57. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 45 wherein the antibody or fragment thereof is part of a composition comprising a mixture or antibodies, optionally: a) a mixture of monoclonal antibodies or antigen binding portion thereof, or b) a mixture of polyclonal antibodies or antigen binding portion thereof, or c) a mixture or monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies or antigen binding portion thereof.

    58-64. (canceled)

    65. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 51, wherein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises one or more serotypes of Dengue virus and/or Zika virus to 90% or 98% or 100%.

    66. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 65, wherein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises one or more serotypes of Dengue virus and/or Zika virus to 98% or 100%.

    67. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 52, wherein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises all serotypes of Dengue virus and Zika virus to 90%.

    68. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 52, wherein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises all serotypes of Dengue virus and Zika virus, 98% or 100%.

    69. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 68 wh erein the antibody or fragment thereof neutralises all serotypes of Dengue virus and Zika virus to 100% at the same concentration of antibody or fragment.

    70. The antibody or fragment thereof of claim 55 wherein the Fab-like fragment is a Fab′ fragment or a F(ab)2 fragment.

    Description

    FIGURE LEGENDS

    [0499] Example 1:

    [0500] FIG. 1. DENV immune plasma crossreacts with ZIKV.

    [0501] (a) Binding titration curves of 6 representative DENV sera against ZIKV strains PF13 and HD78788 and DENV measured by capture ELISA (6-month convalescent plasma using the DENV serotype corresponding to their previous acute infection). (b) End point titers of DENV plasma against ZIKV (strain PF13 and HD78788) and DENV determined by capture ELISA (n=18). Small horizontal lines indicate the median values.

    [0502] FIG. 2. Neutralization of ZIKV by DENV immune plasma.

    [0503] (a) Neutralization of ZIKV determined on Vero cells for 6 representative DENV plasma with 2 ZIKV strains PF13 and HD78788 and DENV (6-month convalescent plasma using the DENV serotype corresponding to their recent infection). Pooled DENV negative serum (PND) was used as negative control. (b) NT50 values for DENV plasma on ZIKV and DENV infection (n=18).

    [0504] FIG. 3. DENV plasma enhances ZIKV infection.

    [0505] (a) Six representative ADE curves of U937 cells infected with ZIKV strains PF13 and HD78788 and DENV (6-month convalescent plasma using the DENV serotype corresponding to their recent infection) in the presence of serially diluted DENV plasma. Pooled negative serum (PND) was used as negative control. (b) Peak fold enhancement of DENV plasma on ZIKV and DENV (n=18).

    [0506] FIG. 4. anti-DENV human monoclonal antibodies bind to ZIKV.

    [0507] (a) Binding of ZIKV strains PF13 and HD78788 and DENV serotype 1 by 33, 17, 45, 37 of anti-EDE1, EDE2, FLE and non-FLE mAbs at lOug/ml, this is representative of three separate experiments. The arrows indicated mAbs used in FIGS. 4b, 5, and 6. (b) Binding titration curves for 9 representative mAbs (3 each for anti-EDE1, EDE2, and FLE mAbs). The assays were done by capture ELISA and shown as mean±2SE from 3 independent experiments.

    [0508] FIG. 5. anti-DENV human monoclonal antibodies enhance ZIKV infection.

    [0509] Infection enhancement curves of 9 anti-DENV mAbs (3 each for anti-EDE1, EDE2, and FLE mAbs) on ZIKV strains PF13 and HD78788. U937 cells were used as target cells. The data are shown as mean±2SE from 2 independent experiments.

    [0510] FIG. 6. anti-EDE1 human monoclonal antibodies inhibit ADE of DENV plasma.

    [0511] The inhibition curves of 9 anti-DENV mAbs 3 each for anti-EDE1, EDE2, and FLE mAbs) on ZIKV strains PF13 and HD78788. U937 cells were infected with ZIKV in the presence of 1:1000 pooled convalescent dengue serum (the dilution giving peak enhancement) together with serially diluted anti-DENV mAbs. Anti-flu mAb, 28C, was used as a negative control. The data are representative of 3 independent experiments.

    [0512] FIG. 7. EDE1 antibody binding to Zika virus strains PF13 and HD78788. Antibody designations are as used in WO 2016/012800.

    [0513] Example 2 Figure Legends:

    [0514] FIG. 1: ZIKV/DENV E protein phylogeny and reactivity with DENV-elicited antibodies. a) Phylogenetic trees of the main human pathogenic flaviviruses based on the amino acid sequences of the E protein (left panel) and of the polymerase NS5 protein (right panel). The arthropod vectors are differentiated by the background color. b) ZIKV sE reactivity with human recombinant IgG mAbs FLE P6B10, EDE1 C8 and EDE2 A11. Left panel: Binding properties were monitored by Biolayer interferometry on Octet RED (ForteBio). Normalized response values at inferred equilibrium were deduced from individual sensograms of binding monitored at different ZIKV sE concentration (see right panel for EDE1 C8). The response values expressed as fraction of binding site occupancy are plotted against concentrations of ZIKV sE dimer shown at logarithmic scale. Lines denote global curve fits used for Kd evaluation (see ED FIG. 1 for linear concentration range showing concentration dependent saturation fits). Right panel: Binding and dissociation kinetics of ZIKV sE dimer in solution to human IgG1 C8 immobilized on anti-human IgG Fc capture biosensors; shown are individual sensograms of 2-fold serial dilutions of ZIKV sE (as indicated). See also ED FIG. 1a.

    [0515] FIG. 2: Neutralization curves using three antibodies each from the three subsets FLE, EDE1 and EDE2. The results represent the mean of four independent experiments done each in triplicate for PF13 and duplicate for HD78788 strains. The two ZIKV strains are in bright colors, red and blue. The neutralization data for the 4 DENV serotypes (pale colors) were taken from ref .sup.27, and are given here for comparison. The corresponding 50% FRNT values are provided in Table 1. Note that the DENV4 strain used was a natural isolate lacking the N153 glycosylation site.

    [0516] FIG. 3: EDE1 C8/ZIKV sE complex. a) overall view of the complex, with the sE moiety colored according to domains (domains I, II and III in red, yellow and blue, respectively, and the fusion loop in orange) and the antibodies colored grey and dark green for light and heavy chains, respectively. The CDRs are distinguished by different colors labeled in b in the corresponding color (H1 light blue, H2 sand, H3 pink, L1 light gray, L2 red, L3 orange). The inset shows a comparison with the corresponding DENV-2 complex. The antibodies are in yellow and sE in grey. For clarity, the variable region of the C8 Fab fragment of the DENV2-C8 complex was superposed on the scFv in complex with ZIKV sE in order to draw the Fab axis and better show the binding angles. These angles look different because of the difference in curvature in the two crystal structures. b) Zoom of the EDE1 C8/sE interaction to show the recognition of the b strand. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines and immobilized water molecules at the interface as red spheres. c) Same region on the DENV-2 sE/C8 Fab complex. Note that the N67 glycan on DENV also interacts with the antibody. d) The footprint of EDE1 C8 is outlined on ZIKV sE dimer shown in surface representation (looking from outside the virion) colored according to conservation of surface exposed amino acids. Main chain atoms and atoms from conserved side chains are colored orange, highly similar side chains are yellow and all the other atoms are white. e, f) Footprints of EDE1 C8 on a surface representation of ZIKV sE (e) and DENV2 sE (f) shown in pink. The two protomers of sE in the dimer are in light and dark gray for clarity. Relevant antigenic sE regions are labeled. Note the more confined interacting surface in ZIKV sE dimer than DENV2, eg N67 glycan is absent in ZIKV sE.

    [0517] FIG. 4: EDE2 A11/ZIKV sE complex. Color coding is as in FIG. 3. a) Overall view of the complex, with only one Fab bound per sE dimer, due to crystal packing. The dashed ellipse represents the position of the missing A11 Fab. The inset compares the angle of binding to the sE dimer in ZIKV and in DENV-2. b) Interactions at the b strand in ZIKV (left panel) and c) in DENV-2 (right panel). Note the different angle of the b strand with respect to the antibody (the antibody is exactly in the same orientation in both panels) d,e) Zoom of the glycan on the 150 loop for ZIKV sE (d) and for DENV-2 sE (e), with sugar residue numbers described in the key. The CDR H3 helix is too far to make interactions with the glycan, as is the case in the DENV-2 structure (see ED FIGS. 3 and 6b).

    [0518] ED FIG. 1: Antibody binding to recombinant ZIKV protein. a) Biolayer interferometry experiments plotted on a linear scale. The antibodies were immobilized on the biosensor tip, and the ZIKV sE protein was in solution at the indicated concentrations. The antibody used is indicated in each plot. Note that the horizontal scale is different for the three antibodies. The estimated dissociation constant (Kd) and the estimated dissociation rate (Koff) are indicated. b) Size exclusion chromatography results for isolated sE, isolated Fab fragments, and ZIKV sE +Fab fragments, as indicated.

    [0519] ED FIG. 2. Residues involved in bnAB/antigen interactions. Antibody contacts on the amino acid sequence alignment of ZIKV and DENV-2 sE. A red background highlights identical residues. Secondary structure elements are indicated together with their labels above (ZIKV) and below (DENV-2) the sequences. The domain organization of ZIKV and DENV-2 sE is symbolized by a colored bar above the sequences (domain I red, domain II yellow, domain III blue and the fusion loop orange). Residues involved in polar and van der Waals protein-protein contacts are marked using blue and green symbols, respectively, as indicated in the inset key, displayed above and below the alignment for ZIKV and DENV-2 sE, respectively. Full and empty symbols correspond to antibody contacts on the reference subunit of sE (defined as the one contributing the fusion loop to the epitope) and the opposite subunit of sE, respectively. Residues contacted only by the heavy or light chain are marked with squares or triangles, respectively, and those contacted by both antibody chains with circles. The details of the amino acid contacts are listed in the ED Tables 4 and 5. Dots above the sequences mark every 10 residues on the ZIKV sE sequence. Disulfide bridges are numbered in green above the sequences.

    [0520] ED FIG. 3. Amino acid sequence of the heavy and light chains variable domains (vH and vL) of bnAbs EDE1 C8 (top) and EDE2 A11 (bottom) with the framework (FRW) indicated by black bars and IMGT CDR regions by thin dashed lines. The secondary structure elements of the Ig vH and vL β-barrels are indicated above the sequences. Somatic mutations are in red and residues arising from recombination at the V-D-J junction are in green. Symbols above and below the sequences mark residues involved in contacts with ZIKV and DENV-2 sE, respectively, coded for the contacted site in sE as indicated in the key (inset at the bottom). Polar and van der Waals contacts are shown in blue and green, respectively. The antibody residues contacting the reference sE subunit (defined as the one contributing the fusion loop to the epitope) are marked by plain color symbols while those making contact across the dimer interface by empty colored symbols. Red boxes highlight the contacts found in the DENV-2 sE complex and absent in the ZIKV sE complex, involving N67 glycan, kl and 150 loops. The details of the polar contacts are listed in the Extended Data Tables 4 and 5 (see also FIGS. 3e and 30. The predicted vH and vL germline alleles are indicated with the corresponding CDR lengths (see Table 1 in ref .sup.30).

    [0521] ED FIG. 4. Details of EDE1 C8 bnAb contact across the dimer interface. a) Overall view of the ZIKV sE /EDE1 C8 scFv complex. The box indicates the region zoomed in b. b) Details of the interactions of the C8 light chain with domain III across the dimer interface. c) Same region for the EDE1 C8/DENV-2 complex. Note that the sE residues involved are different. d) The complex rotated by 120 degrees (as indicated by the arrow) to show the interaction in the ij loop, enlarged in e. e) The ij loop is displayed in sticks, in order to show the interaction of its main chain with the antibody. Domain II from the subunit across is colored green to distinguish from domain II of the reference subunit; the dashed sticks for the Arginine shown is to indicate that it has poor electron density in the crystal. f) Same view of the complex with DENV-2. Note that the residues from across the dimer interface that contact the antibody are different. The residues in the various CDRs are colored coded, matching their label color (as in FIGS. 3 and 4).

    [0522] ED FIG. 5. Surface electrostatic potential on an open-book representation of the immmunocomplexes. The electrostatic potential is colored according to the bar underneath. The antibody footprints are outlined in green. The disordered 150 loop in the complex with C8 (left panels) results in a positive surface patch at one edge of the epitope, which is counteracted by the residues in the 150 loop, as shown on the right hand panel, in the complex with A11 where this loop is ordered.

    [0523] ED FIG. 6. Details of the A11 interaction with the glycan on the 150 loop. a) superposition of the ZIKV sE/A11 complex (in colors)on the E protein from the cryo-EM structure of the mature virion.sup.18 (PDB code SIRE) in white. The E-protein was superimposed on the tip of domain II of the reference subunit together with domain III from the opposite subunit. It shows that the 150 loop adopts essentially the same conformation, although fewer sugar residues are visible in the absence of the antibody. b) Superposition of the A11/ZIKV complex (in colors) on the A11/DENV sE complex (in white). The variable domains of the antibody from the two structures were superimposed on each other. Note that in DENV-2 the glycan packs against the a-helix of the CDR H3, whereas in ZIKV sE the glycan is too far to make the same interaction. c) The C8/ ZIKV sE complex (in pink) was superimposed on the ZIKV/A11 complex (in colors), to show the clash of the C8 light chain with the glycan, forcing it to move out of the way and be disordered. The superposition also shows that EDE1 C8 reaches further in to contact the ij loop and the kl loop of the adjacent subunit, as well as domain III. As in a), the superposition was done using the tip of domain II of the reference subunit and domain III of the adjacent subunit in the dimer as anchors. The two black asterisks mark the places where the electron density of the 150 loop is lost, resulting in no density in the C8/sE crystal for the short helix, nor for the glycan; d) Crystallization conditions, data collection and refinement statistics; e) Root mean square deviations between sE dimers in the various structures of ZIKV and DENV-2; f) Buried Surface area of SE protein by Fabs or ScFv.

    [0524] ED FIG. 7. Sequence alignment sE ZIKV-DENV-2

    [0525] Example 3 Figure Legends:

    [0526] FIG. 1. (A) Homology of E protein sequences between different flaviviruses showing the close similarity between Zika and Dengue; Zika-DV3—58%, DV1—57%, DV4—56%, DV2—54%. (B) Schematic of the dengue genome translated into a single polyprotein which is cleaved into 3 structural and 7 non-structural proteins by host proteases, Furin and signalase, and viral protease, NS3/2B.

    [0527] FIG. 2. Dengue virus structure at neutral pH A) the structure of the immature dengue particle shows the arrangement of E and prM into sirmerc (heterohexameric spikes). Mackenzie et al Nat. Med. 2004 10:S98 B) the mature dengue virus shows 90 head to tail dimers of E arranged into a smooth virus particle following cleavage of prM. Kuhn et al Cell 2002 108: 717.

    [0528] FIG. 3. The structures of DENV-2 in complex with anti-EDE-mAB showing the epitope of anti-EDE antibody lies across 2 E within a dimer. A) side view and B) top view. Domain I, II and III of E protein are indicated in red, yellow and blue. On the top view, grey and green ovals show the binding areas of heavy and light chains of the anti-EDE mAb. C) Exposed main-chain atoms in the epitope. Surface representative of DENV-2 sE as viewed from outside the virion with exposed main-chain atoms orange (top) or with main-chain atoms plus conserved side chains in orange, and highly similar side chains in yellow (bottom). The epitopes of two EDE mAbs are indicated.

    [0529] FIG. 4. Binding of a panel of EDE and FLE mb to engineered disulphide stabilised dimer (red) versus wild type E which is predominantly in the monomer form (blue) by ELISA. A) Anti-EDE mAbs bind to the dimer but not monomer B) Most anti-FLE binding mAb show reduced binding to dimer compared to monomer.

    [0530] FIG. 5. Neutralization assays from 4 mice primed and boosted with either wild type monomeric DENV2 or mutant disulphide bond linked E-dimers shwing increased neutralisation titres with the dimeric-E.

    [0531] FIG. 6. Flowchart for resurfacing strategy.

    [0532] FIG. 7. The E dimer is shown in surface representation one subunit in white and the other in grey, with the fusion loop region in yellow. The outline of the EDE is in black. Candidate residues for resurfacing are displayed in bright colours: green and red for serotype variable and conserved residues, respectively.

    [0533] Example 4

    [0534] FIG. 1

    [0535] In vivo efficacy of C10 in the AG129 mouse model. AG129 mice (female, 8-10 weeks of age; n=3) were treated with 50 or 200 μg purified C10 or 2-8C intraperitoneally as described in the Methods section. Mice were infected intraperitoneally with 200 μL of a 1.2×10.sup.2 FFU/mouse with ZIKV PE243; 24 h post antibody treatment. (A) Percentage original body weight curves of ZIKV-infected mice treated with C10 antibody (red and blue symbols) or 2-8C isotype control (green and purple symbols) were plotted compared to PBS treated uninfected mice (black symbols). Data represent results from one experiment and are plotted as average +/− weight measurements from 3 mice per infected group. (B) Viral titres were determined from plasma samples isolated from individual mice at day 2 and day 4 post infection. Viral titres calculated as foci forming units per ml plasma have been represented as mean +/− SEM of plasma viral titres in individual mice.

    EXAMPLE 1

    Dengue Serocrossreactivity Drives Antibody Dependent Enhancement of Zika virus Infection

    [0536] Zika virus was discovered in 1947 and was thought to lead to relatively mild disease. The recent explosive outbreak of Zika in South America has led to widespread concern with reports of neurological sequelae ranging from Guillain Bane syndrome to microcephaly. Zika has followed in the path of dengue a flavivirus closely related to Zika. Here we investigate the serological crossreaction between the two viruses. Dengue immune plasma substantially crossreacts with Zika and can drive antibody dependent enhancement of Zika infection. Using a panel of human anti-dengue monoclonal antibodies we show that most antibodies reacting to dengue envelope protein also react to Zika and antibodies to linear epitopes including the immunodominant fusion loop epitope whilst binding to Zika cannot neutralize the virus but promote ADE. These data indicate that dengue immunity may drive higher Zika replication and have implications for disease pathogenesis and future Zika and dengue vaccine programmes.

    [0537] Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arbovirus belonging to the family flaviviridae and is transmitted to man by Aedes mosquitos'. ZIKV was first isolated from a sentinel rhesus monkey in the Zika forest of Uganda in 1947 and has subsequently been found in mosquitos and humans.sup.2,3. Until recently ZIKV has not been viewed as a particularly important pathogen as the majority of infections are asymptomatic.sup.4. Symptomatic cases of ZIKV resemble mild cases of dengue fever with fever, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, conjunctivitis and rash.sup.1, 7, 12, 13, 14.

    [0538] Until recently cases were sporadic largely in Africa and South East Asia and epidemic activity had not been observed.sup.1, 8, 9, 10, 11. A large outbreak of ZIKV occurred on Yap island in the Western Pacific in 2007 and spread through Oceania and reached Brazil in 2015 where it rapidly spread to involve other South American countries.sup.1, 7, 12, 13, 14.

    [0539] It is now apparent that ZIKV infection can case significant neurological complications; increased cases of Guillain Bane syndrome were first reported following the outbreak in French Polynesia in 2013 .sup.15. Dramatic increases in the incidence of microcephaly originating in North Eastern Brazil were reported in late 2015 coincident with a large increase in ZIKV infection 16, 17. These increases in Guillain Barre syndrome and microcephaly led the World Health Organization to declare ZIKV a public health emergency in February 2016 .sup.18.

    [0540] ZIKV can be carried by a variety of Aedes mosquitos but the principal species responsible for the current outbreaks is thought to be Aedes aegypti.sup.1, 5. In parts of Brazil Aedes aegypti is also spreading DENV and chikungunya viruses concurrently with ZIKV.sup.19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. In the last 20 years DENV has spread through areas of South America and the seroprevalence of DENV in some areas affected by ZIKV exceeds 90%.sup.25, 26, 27.

    [0541] DENV exists as four serotypes which differ in amino acid sequence by 30-35% and the DENV serocomplex in turn differs from ZIKV by 41-46%(E protein).sup.28. Recent reports have shown difficulty in distinguishing DENV and ZIKV infections serologically implying a degree of antigenic similarity between the viruses.sup.7, 29, 30.

    [0542] Following a primary DENV infection an individual develops life long immunity to the infecting serotype but not to the other serotypes.sup.31, 32. In DENV endemic areas all four viruses frequently co-circulate or cyclically replace each other meaning that multiple sequential infections are common.sup.33. One of the interesting features of DENV infection is that the life threatening complications, leading to dengue haemorrhagic fever, are more common following secondary rather than primary infections.sup.28. One theory to explain this is antibody dependent enhancement (ADE).sup.28. The ADE hypothesis suggests that antibodies generated to a primary infection will not be of sufficient concentration or avidity to neutralize a secondary infecting DENV, which differs in amino acid sequence by 30-35%. However, they may still opsonize the secondary virus and target it for Fc receptor mediated endocytosis into myeloid cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, which are the principal site for DENV replication, thus driving higher virus loads. ADE can be readily demonstrated in vitro and has also be shown to drive higher dengue virus loads in animal models.sup.34, 35, 36, 37.

    [0543] Here we take advantage of panel of 132 human monoclonal antibodies generated from DENV infected individuals to demonstrate substantial crossreactivity between DENV and ZIKV. Most anti-DENV monoclonal antibodies also bind to ZIKV but those recognizing the major linear fusion loop epitope (FLE) are non-neutralizing. DENV plasma and mAb can potently enhance ZIKV infection suggesting the possibility that preexisting DENV immunity may increase ZIKV replication.

    [0544] Results

    [0545] DENV Plasma Crossreacts with ZIKV

    [0546] Plasma from individuals taken 6 months following secondary DENV infection with serotypes 1-4 was tested for binding to ZIKV and DENVs by capture ELISA. In all cases DENV immune plasma bound to both DENV and ZIKV (FIG. 1a). There were no appreciable differences in binding to viral strains originating in Africa (HD78788) or French Polynesia (PF13) (FIG. 1b).

    [0547] Next we tested neutralization of ZIKV by convalescent DENV plasma. All convalescent DENV plasma could neutralize DENV infection to nearly 100% at the lowest dilution used of 1: 50 (FIG. 2a). However, neutralization of ZIKV was considerably less efficient with most sera showing no appreciable neutralization (FIG. 2a & b). The finding that anti-DENV plasma substantially crossreacts with ZIKV prompted us to determine whether it could promote ADE.

    [0548] DENV Plasma Potently Induces ADE

    [0549] One of the hallmarks of DENV infection is the increase in severity of illness during secondary infections. One of the explanations of this is antibody dependent enhancement, whereby preexisting antibodies directed to a previous DENV infection, opsonize but do not neutralize a secondary infection. Opsonized virus is targeted for uptake by Fc receptor expressing myeloid cells such as monocytes and macrophages driving higher virus replication.

    [0550] We tested the ability of DENV plasma to promote ADE in the myeloid cell line U937 which is relatively resistant to infection by DENV in the absence of ADE and here we show U937 is also poorly permissive to ZIKV infection in the absence of ADE. ZIKV was preincubated with a titration of pooled convalescent anti-dengue plasma obtained at 2 weeks and then used to infect U937 cells. Pooled convalescent plasma led to substantial enhancement of infection>100 fold to both Zika viruses and as expected pooled control non-dengue serum did not enhance infection (FIG. 3a). Next we tested a panel of convalescent plasma obtained 6 months following acute secondary dengue infection. In all but one case DENV plasma increased ZIKV infection with a median 12-fold increase of HD78788 infection (FIG. 3b). In summary these results demonstrate that crossreacting anti-DENV antibodies can promote ADE of ZIKV but are poorly neutralizing.

    [0551] Cross Reaction of Anti DENV Monoclonal Antibodies

    [0552] We have previously created a pool of 145 human monoclonal antibodies reacting to the DENV envelope protein, generated from plasmablasts isolated from DENV infected patients.sup.34. Detailed epitope mapping of these antibodies demonstrated three broad reactivities. Around ⅓ of the antibodies reacted to the well described fusion loop epitope (FLE), ⅓ were not definitively mapped, but like the fusion loop antibodies they reacted to envelope protein by Western Blot (these are termed non-FLE as they were not sensitive to mutation of envelope residue W101). Finally, a group of around 40 antibodies did not react to envelope protein by western blot and only bound to intact virus particles. These antibodies were shown by cryo electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography to bind to a conformational quaternary epitope formed at the interface of two envelope protein monomers making up the basic head to tail dimer, 90 of which are arranged in icosahedral symmetry into the DENV glycoprotein shell .sup.34, 38. We termed this new epitope the E dimer epitope (EDE), which were subdivided into two groups EDE1 and EDE2 based on the sensitivity to the removal of the N-linked glycan N153 in E (EDE2 binding was reduced by removal of N153, EDE1 not). Some EDE antibodies were fully crossreactive to all four DENV serotypes and could neutralize infection in the picomolar range.

    [0553] Binding of the panel of anti-DENV monoclonal antibodies to ZIKV was tested by capture ELISA and compared to binding to DENV (FIG. 4a). The profile of binding between the African (HD78788) and French Polynesian (PF13) strains was highly similar, all of the fusion loop antibodies cross reacted with ZIKV, 36/37 of the non fusion loop antibodies crossreacted whereas the crossreaction of the EDE antibodies was variable with 27/33 EDE1 and 8/17 EDE2. Binding curves showed a lower avidity of binding of EDE2 antibodies versus EDE1 and lower avidity of the EDE1 mAb 752-2B2(FIG. 4b).

    [0554] It has previously been demonstrated that almost all mAb generated against DENV promote ADE, which includes all of the 145 human monoclonal antibodies we generated in our previous studies'. Because of the crossreactivity of the DENV mAb to ZIKV we next tested the ability of anti-DENV monoclonal antibodies to promote ADE of ZIKV virus infection (FIG. 5). Firstly, we tested 3 fusion loop antibodies which showed no neutralization activity against ZIKV. All of these antibodies promoted ADE enhancing infection of HD78788 54-78 fold compared to ZIKV incubated with no antibody or irrelevant control mAb. As expected, the ZIKV neutralizing EDE mAb also promoted ADE of ZIKV when added in subneutralizing concentrations, although peak enhancement was seen with lower concentrations than with the fusion loop mAb. This demonstrates that monoclonal antibodies isolated from dengue infected patients, with a number of different specificities, have broad crossreactivities to ZIKV.

    [0555] EDE mAb can Inhibit ADE of DENV Plasma

    [0556] Fusion loop and EDE mAb have overlapping epitopes as the footprint of the EDE also covers the fusion loop region. To test whether EDE antibodies could overcome ADE induced by polyclonal anti-DENV plasma we added a titration of anti-DENV EDE1 mAb to ZIKV incubated with an enhancing concentration of anti-DENV plasma (FIG. 6). Fusion loop antibodies had no effect, whereas the EDE1 mAb, except 752-2B2 which has lower avidity for ZIKV, were able to potently inhibit ADE of PF13 infection with 50% inhibition occurring at titers of 0.091±0.007 and 0.034±0.006 ug/ml of 752-2C8 and 753(3)C10, respectively. EDE2 mAb which are of lower avidity for ZIKV than the EDE1 mAb were not able to inhibit ADE in this assay. These studies demonstrate that EDE1 antibodies can potently inhibit ZIKV ADE and if present at sufficient levels could be protective in vivo.

    [0557] Discussion

    [0558] The recent explosion of ZIKV virus infection in South America with associated Guillain Barre syndrome and microcephaly are of great concern.sup.15, 16, 17. Guillain Bane Syndrome, is a relatively rare complication, estimated to affect 0.024% of ZIKV infected individuals, but owing to the scale of the ZIKV epidemic this still translates to large number of cases.sup.15. Much work still needs to be performed to understand the exact causes of microcephaly, however, it is becoming increasingly clear that this is caused by intrauterine infection of the developing brain.sup.17, 39, 40, 41, 42. Zika has been shown in animal models to infect the placenta and stunt growth and also to be able to cross the placenta and infect the brain.sup.43, 44, 45. Furthermore in vitro ZIKV can infect neural cell cultures and disrupt development in neurospheres.sup.46, 47. The exact risk of neurological damage following maternal infection remains to be determined, but early studies suggest that this may be up to 22% in the first trimester although other reports from French Polynesia put the risk at around 1%.sup.48, 49.

    [0559] ZIKV is spread by Aedes mosquitos and currently in South America these mosquitos are also promoting epidemic spread of DENV and Chikungunya viruses.sup.19. In many areas affected by ZIKV the seropositivity to DENV is very high and in such areas there is great difficulty in distinguishing ZIKV and DENV infection serologically.sup.26, 27, 30. In this paper we have demonstrated substantial crossreactivity of the anti-DENV serological response towards ZIKV. Most anti-DENV plasma poorly neutralizes ZIKV yet can potently induce ADE.

    [0560] In a related Example we have studied neutralization of ZIKV by anti-DENV human monoclonal antibodies. Interestingly, anti-fusion loop antibodies, which form a major part of the antibody response in DENV infection.sup.28 and which we show here promote ADE, fail to neutralize infection. Antibodies reacting to the fusion loop are known to be broadly reactive across a number of flaviviruses but despite often strong crossreaction by ELISA methods rarely show crossneutralizing activity perhaps because their epitopes are poorly exposed on native virus particles.sup.50. In addition we show that EDE1 mAb showed potent neutralization in a similar picomolar range to their neutralization of DENV whilst EDE2 mAb also neutralize ZIKV but not as potently as EDE1 mAb. These results are presented together with X-ray crystallographic structures of EDE1 and EDE2 Fab in complex with the ZIKV envelope.

    [0561] Antibody dependent enhancement was first recognized nearly 50 years ago in DENV infection and is believed to be one of the factors driving increased severity of secondary infections which is a hallmark of DENV.sup.36. The risk of ADE has made the development of DENV vaccines particularly difficult. The most advanced DENV vaccine Dengvaxia (CYD-TDV) produced by Sanofi Pasteur has just been licensed in several countries and gives some protection from infection; it is estimated that it will reduce the burden of disease by 10-30% over a 30 year period if deployed in endemic countries.sup.51.

    [0562] Dengvaxia is a tetravalent live attenuated vaccine where the sequences encoding the precursor membrane protein and envelope proteins that make up the glycoprotein shell of the DENV are combined with the non-structural sequences from the attenuated 17D yellow fever vaccine strain.sup.28. Dengvaxia seems to give protection to individuals who have been previously infected with DENV but efficacy when given to DENV naive vaccinees is less.sup.28, 51.

    [0563] A recent longer term analysis of the vaccine trials of Dengvaxia has raised some safety concerns.sup.28. In the under 9 age groups hospitalization from DENV infection was higher in vaccinated children than in the non-vaccinated control group. This may represent antibody dependent enhancement in children who at entry to the study trial were DENV naive and have been primed but not protected by the vaccine. For this reason the vaccine is not licensed for use in children<9 years and furthermore it is recommended to be used only in populations where the seroprevalence of prior DENV exposure in the age group to be vaccinated is 70% or greater.sup.51.

    [0564] There is now great pressure to produce a vaccine against ZIKV, the extensive crossreaction between DENV and ZIKV serologically must be considered in this regard. It is likely that the vaccine will need to be deployed in areas with high DENV seroprevalence and raising de novo ZIKV neutralizing responses in such a setting may be challenging. There is also the possibility that ZIKV vaccination in DENV naive subjects may promote ADE of DENV and conversely that DENV vaccination may promote ADE of ZIKV infection.

    [0565] The results described here show a complex serological interaction between DENV and ZIKV. The precise reason for the explosion of ZIKV infection and its complications in Brazil will need to be fully determined but it is possible that the preexisting DENV immunity is driving higher virus replication in infected individuals which may in turn may drive higher mosquito infection and spread and greater risk of complications. The possibility that ADE may aid transplacental transfer of ZIKV also needs to be investigated. The timings of DENV versus ZIKV infection may also be important as cross reacting protective and enhancing immunity may change over time following DENV infection.

    [0566] In summary, although ZIKV differs in sequence by around 41-46% (E protein) from DENVs the similarities are sufficient to allow crossreaction of anti-DENV antibodies with the ZIKV and to drive antibody dependent enhancement. In this respect ZIKV could be considered as a fifth member of the DENV serocomplex, a factor which must be considered in vaccine approaches to these two viruses.

    [0567] Methods

    [0568] Samples

    [0569] Blood samples were collected after written informed consent and the approval of the ethical committee of the Khon Kaen and Siriraj Hospitals in Thailand and the Riverside Ethics Committee in UK. The serotypes of DENV infection was determined by RT-PCR detection of the viral genome. Samples were collected 6 months after recovery from dengue illness.

    [0570] Cells, Reagents and Antibodies Vero cells (a gift from AFRIMS), 293T, and U937 cells were cultured at 37° C. in MEM, DMEM and RPMI-1640, respectively. C6/36 cells (a gift from AFRIMS) were grown in Leibovitz L-15 at 28° C. All media contained 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 ug/ml streptomycin. All cell lines were free from mycoplasma contamination.

    [0571] Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-conjugated anti-human IgG (A9544) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG (P0214) were purchased from Sigma and Dako, respectively. Mouse monoclonal anti-DENV E, 4G2, was a gift from AFRIMS. RPMI-1640 (R8758), DMEM (D5046), p-nitrophenylphosphate (PNPP, N2770-50), Bovine serum albumin (BSA, A7030), diaminobenzidine (D5905), and polyethylenimine (408727; Sigma) were from Sigma. MEM (31095) and Leibovitz L-15 (11415) were from Gibco and UltraDOMA-PF (12-727F) was from Lonza.

    [0572] Viral stocks.

    [0573] All viruses were grown in C6/36 cells. ZIKV strain HD78788 (African strain) was provided by Anavaj Sakuntabhai. ZIKV strain PF13/251013-18 (PF13) was isolated from a patient during ZIKV outbreak in French Polynesia 2013. DENV-1 (Hawaii), DENV-2 (16681), DENV-3 (H87) and DENV-4 (1-0093) were gifts from AFRIMS. Virus containing supernatants were clarified by centrifugation at 2000 rpm at 4° C. before being stored at −80° C. Viral titres were determined by a focus-forming assay on Vero cells.sup.34. All virus stocks were free from mycoplasma contamination.

    [0574] Expression of Human Monoclonal Anti-DENV E Antibodies

    [0575] A pair of plasmids containing heavy and light chains of immunoglobulin G1 were co-transfected into 293T cells by a polyethylenimine method and cultured in protein-free media. Culture supernatant containing antibodies was harvested after 5 days.

    [0576] Determination of ZIKV Crossreactivity of anti-DENV Antibodies by ELISA

    [0577] A MAXISORP immunoplate (442404; NUNC) was coated with mouse anti-E protein, 4G2 (a fusion loop murine Ab which crossreacts to ZIKV). Plates were blocked with 3% BSA for one hour followed by incubation with viral supernatant. After one hour, 10 ug/ml anti-DENV humAbs or serially diluted plasma was added. The reaction was visualized by ALP-conjugated anti-human IgG antibody (A9544; Sigma) and PNPP substrate. Reactions were stopped with NaOH and the absorbance measured at 405 nm. Endpoint titers (EPTs) were defined as reciprocal plasma dilutions that corresponded to 2 times the average OD values obtained with mock antigen.

    [0578] Neutralization Assay

    [0579] The focus reduction neutralization assay (FRNT) was employed to determine the neutralizing potential of antibodies. Virus was incubated with serial dilutions of antibodies or plasma samples for an hour at 37° c. The mixtures were then added to Vero cells and incubated for 2 (for ZIKV) or 3 days (for DENV). Focus forming assays were then performed as described'. Briefly, Vero cells were stained with anti-E mAb 4G2 followed by peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig (P0047; Sigma). The foci (infected cells) were visualized by adding peroxidase substrate, DAB. The percentage focus reduction was calculated and 50% FRNT was calculated using the probit program from the SPSS package.

    [0580] Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Assay

    [0581] Serially diluted antibody or plasma samples were incubated with virus for one hour at 37° C. before adding to U937 cells. After incubation 2 (for ZIKV) or 3 days (for DENV), supernatants were harvested and viral titres determined by focus forming assay. Fold enhancement was calculated by comparison to viral titres in the presence/absence of antibody.

    [0582] The ADE inhibition by human mAbs was performed by premixing pooled convalescent dengue hyper immune serum at 1:10,000 dilution (a peak enhancing dilution) with serially diluted antibody before performing the ADE assay as described above.

    REFERENCES

    [0583] 1. Musso, D., Gubler D. J. Zika Virus. Clin Microbiol Rev 29, 487-524 (2016). [0584] 2. Dick, G. W., Kitchen S. F., Haddow A. J. Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46, 509-520 (1952). [0585] 3. Macnamara, F. N. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 48, 139-145 (1954). [0586] 4. Lazear, H. M., Diamond M. S. Zika Virus: New Clinical Syndromes and Its Emergence in the Western Hemisphere. J Virol 90, 4864-4875 (2016). [0587] 5. World Health Organization. Zika Virus Fact sheet: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/en/. (2016). [0588] 6. Bearcroft, W. G. Zika virus infection experimentally induced in a human volunteer. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 50, 442-448 (1956). [0589] 7. Duffy, M. R. et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 360, 2536-2543 (2009). [0590] 8. Dick, G. W. Zika virus. II. Pathogenicity and physical properties. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46, 521-534 (1952). [0591] 9. Fagbami, A. H. Zika virus infections in Nigeria: virological and seroepidemiological investigations in Oyo State. J Hyg (Lond) 83, 213-219 (1979). [0592] 10. Haddow, A. D. et al. Genetic characterization of Zika virus strains: geographic expansion of the Asian lineage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6, e1477 (2012). [0593] 11. Hayes, E. B. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 15, 1347-1350 (2009). [0594] 12. Cao-Lormeau, V. M. et al. Zika virus, French polynesia, South pacific, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis 20, 1085-1086 (2014). [0595] 13. Zanluca, C. et al. First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 110, 569-572 (2015). [0596] 14. Campos, G. S., Bandeira A. C., Sardi S. I. Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 21, 1885-1886 (2015). [0597] 15. Cao-Lormeau, V. M. et al. Guillain-Barre Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study. Lancet 387, 1531-1539 (2016). [0598] 16. Teixeira, M. G., da Conceicao N. C. M., de Oliveira W. K., Nunes M. L., Rodrigues L. C. The Epidemic of Zika Virus-Related Microcephaly in Brazil: Detection, Control, Etiology, and Future Scenarios. Am J Public Health 106, 601-605 (2016). [0599] 17. Mlakar, J. et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N Engl J Med 374, 951-958 (2016). [0600] 18. World Health Organization. Zika emergency: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2016/1st-emergency-committee-zika/en/. (2016). [0601] 19. Musso, D., Cao-Lormeau V. M., Gubler D. J. Zika virus: following the path of dengue and chikungunya? Lancet 386, 243-244 (2015). [0602] 20. Cardoso, C. W. et al. Outbreak of Exanthematous Illness Associated with Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Viruses, Salvador, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 21, 2274-2276 (2015). [0603] 21. Teixeira, M. G. et al. East/Central/South African genotype chikungunya virus, Brazil, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis 21, 906-907 (2015). [0604] 22. Weaver, S. C., Lecuit M. Chikungunya virus and the global spread of a mosquito-borne disease. N Engl JMed 372, 1231-1239 (2015). [0605] 23. Guzman, M. G., Harris E. Dengue. Lancet 385, 453-465 (2015). [0606] 24. Morrison, T. E. Reemergence of chikungunya virus. J Virol 88, 11644-11647 (2014). [0607] 25. Brathwaite Dick, O. et al. The history of dengue outbreaks in the Americas. Am J Trop Med Hyg 87, 584-593 (2012). [0608] 26. Castanha, P. M. et al. Force of infection of dengue serotypes in a population-based study in the northeast of Brazil. Epidemiol Infect 141, 1080-1088 (2013). [0609] 27. Braga, C. et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors for dengue infection in socio-economically distinct areas of Recife, Brazil. Acta Trop 113, 234-240 (2010).

    [0610] 28. Screaton, G., Mongkolsapaya J., Yacoub S., Roberts C. New insights into the immunopathology and control of dengue virus infection. Nat Rev Immunol 15, 745-759 (2015).

    [0611] 29. Buathong, R. et al. Detection of Zika Virus Infection in Thailand, 2012-2014. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93, 380-383 (2015). [0612] 30. Lanciotti, R. S. et al. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 14, 1232-1239 (2008). [0613] 31. Guzman, M. G. et al. Neutralizing antibodies after infection with dengue 1 virus. Emerg Infect Dis 13, 282-286 (2007). [0614] 32. Sabin, A. B. Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1, 30-50 (1952). [0615] 33. Guzman, M. G. et al. Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol 8, S7-16 (2010). [0616] 34. Dejnirattisai, W. et al. A new class of highly potent, broadly neutralizing antibodies isolated from viremic patients infected with dengue virus. Nat Immunol 16, 170-177 (2015). [0617] 35. Halstead, S. B., O'Rourke E. J. Dengue viruses and mononuclear phagocytes. I. Infection enhancement by non-neutralizing antibody. J Exp Med 146, 201-217. (1977). [0618] 36. Halstead, S. B., O'Rourke E. J. Antibody-enhanced dengue virus infection in primate leukocytes. Nature 265, 739-741 (1977). [0619] 37. Zompi, S., Harris E. Animal models of dengue virus infection. Viruses 4, 62-82 (2012). [0620] 38. Rouvinski, A. et al. Recognition determinants of broadly neutralizing human antibodies against dengue viruses. Nature, (2015). [0621] 39. Calvet, G. et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis, (2016). [0622] 40. Martines, R. B. et al. Notes from the Field: Evidence of Zika Virus Infection in Brain and Placental Tissues from Two Congenitally Infected Newborns and Two Fetal Losses—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65, 159-160 (2016). [0623] 41. Meaney-Delman, D. et al. Zika Virus Infection Among U.S. Pregnant Travelers—August 2015-February 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65, 211-214 (2016). [0624] 42. Sarno, M. et al. Zika Virus Infection and Stillbirths: A Case of Hydrops Fetalis, Hydranencephaly and Fetal Demise. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10, e0004517 (2016). [0625] 43. Cugola, F. R., Fernandes I. R., Russo F. B., Freitas B. C. The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature, (2016). [0626] 44. Miner, J. J. et al. Zika Virus Infection during Pregnancy in Mice Causes Placental Damage and Fetal Demise. Cell 165, 1-11 (2016). [0627] 45. Li, C., Xu D., Ye Q., Hong S., Jiang Y. Zika Virus Disrupts Neural Progenitor Development and Leads to Microcephaly in Mice. Cell Stem Cell 19, 1-7 (2016). [0628] 46. Dang, J. et al. Zika Virus Depletes Neural Progenitors in Human Cerebral [0629] Organoids through Activation of the Innate Immune Receptor TLR3. Cell Stem Cell, (2016). [0630] 47. Garcez, P. P. et al. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science, (2016). [0631] 48. Brasil, P. et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro-Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med, (2016). [0632] 49. Cauchemez, S. et al. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013-15: a retrospective study. Lancet, (2016). [0633] 50. Stiasny, K., Kiermayr S., Holzmann H., Heinz F. X. Cryptic properties of a cluster of dominant flavivirus cross-reactive antigenic sites. J Virol 80, 9557-9568 (2006). [0634] 51. World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts. Dengue vaccine:

    [0635] http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2016/april/SAGE_April_2016_Meeting_Web_Summary.pdf?ua=1. (2016)

    EXAMPLE 2

    Structural Basis of Potent Cross-Neutralization between Zika and Dengue Viruses

    [0636] Zika virus is a member of the flavivirus genus that had not been associated with severe disease in humans until the recent outbreaks, when it was linked to microcephaly in newborns in Brazil and to Guillain-Barré Syndrome in adults in French Polynesia. Zika virus is related to dengue virus, and we report here that a category of antibodies isolated from dengue patients and targeting a conformational epitope potently neutralize Zika virus. The crystal structure of two of these antibodies in complex with the envelope protein of Zika virus reveals the details of a conserved epitope, which is also the site of interaction of the envelope protein dimer with the precursor prM protein during virus maturation. Comparison of the Zika and dengue virus immunocomplexes lays the foundation for a rational, epitope-focused design of a universal vaccine capable of eliciting potently neutralizing antibodies to protect against Zika and dengue viruses simultaneously.

    [0637] The explosive spread of Zika Virus (ZIKV) in Brazil and other South and Central American countries upon its recent introduction was linked with increasing numbers of microcephaly cases.sup.1-4. There have also been cases of Guillain Barré syndrome linked to ZIKV infections in the 2013-2014 French Polynesian outbreak.sup.5, leading the World Health Organization to declare these neurological disorders a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on Feb. 1, 2016.sup.6. Prior to the epidemics of recent years, ZIKV was thought to cause only mild or self-limiting disease.sup.7. The physiological processes leading to fetal infections and neurological complications are unresolved and specific therapeutic or prophylactic interventions are currently not available. In order to obtain insight into ZIKV pathogenesis and especially for developing safe and protective vaccines it is essential to understand the structural basis of virus neutralization and cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses. ZIKV transmission among humans and epidemic spread is primarily maintained by Aedes mosquitoes, but there are reports of sexual transmission as well.sup.8-10. ZIKV is an arthropod-borne enveloped virus belonging to the flavivirus genus in the family Flaviviridae, which also includes the human pathogenic yellow fever, dengue, West Nile and tick-borne encephalitis viruses.sup.11. Flaviviruses have two structural glycoproteins, prM and E (for precursor Membrane and Envelope proteins, respectively), which form a heterodimer in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of the infected cell and drive the budding of spiky immature virions into the ER lumen. The budded particles are subsequently transported across the secretory pathway of the cell, a process during which prM undergoes proteolytic maturation by the trans-Golgi resident furin protease.sup.12-14. This maturation process is required for infectivity and results in the reorganization on E at the virion surface. The mature particles released from the infected cell have a smooth aspect, with 90 E dimers coating the external surface of the virion, organized with icosahedral symmetry in a “herringbone” pattern.sup.15,16. Three-dimensional cryo-EM structures of the mature ZIKV particles have recently been reported to near atomic resolution (3.8Å).sup.17,18, showing that it has essentially the same organization as the other flaviviruses of known structure, such as dengue virus (DENV), for which a 3.5Å cryo-EM reconstruction was reported previouslyl.sup.16 and also West Nile virus.sup.19,20. The E protein is about 500 amino acids long, with the 400 N-terminal residues forming the ectodomain, essentially folded as β-sheet with three domains named I, II and III, aligned in a row with domain I at the center. The highly conserved fusion loop is at the distal end of the rod in domain II, buried at the E dimer interface. At the C-terminus, the E ectodomain is followed by the so-called “stem”, featuring two a-helices lying flat on the viral membrane (the “stem” helices), which link to two C-terminal trans-membrane α-helices. The main distinguishing feature of the ZIKV virion is an insertion in a glycosylated loop of E (the “150” loop), which protrudes from the virion surface.sup.17,18.

    [0638] Flaviviruses have been grouped into serocomplexes based on cross-neutralization studies with polyclonal immune sera.sup.21. The E protein is the main target of neutralizing antibodies. Because E is responsible for membrane fusion during virus entry, it is maintained in a metastable conformation such that it can be triggered to undergo a conformational change to induce fusion of the viral envelope with an endosomal membrane, thereby releasing the viral genetic material into the cytoplasm. One consequence of this metastability of the E dimer is that it displays a dynamic behavior, termed “breathing”.sup.22, such that it exposes regions normally buried within the dimer interface. One such region is the fusion loop epitope (FLE), which is a dominant cross-reactive antigenic site.sup.23. Although antibodies to this site can be protective by complement-mediated mechanisms, as shown for West Nile virus in a mouse model.sup.24, they are poorly neutralizing and have been shown to lead to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).sup.25-29, thereby aggravating flavivirus pathogenesis and complicating the development of safe and effective vaccines.

    [0639] We recently reported the isolation and structural characterization of a panel of antibodies isolated from dengue patients.sup.27,30. A majority of these antibodies targeted the FLE, but others targeted a quaternary site readily accessible at the exposed surface of the E protein on the virion, at the interface between the two E subunits in the dimer. These broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs), termed EDE for “E-dimer epitope”, potently neutralize all four serotypes of DENV. Their binding site is conserved across serotypes because it is also the interaction site of prM with E dimers during transport of the immature virus particles through the Golgi apparatus of the cell. There were two subsets of EDE Mabs, characterized by a differential requirement for glycosylation on the 150 loop for binding. The EDE1 bnAbs bind better in the absence of glycan, whereas EDE2 bnAbs bind better when the glycan is present.

    [0640] In this Example we identified that the EDE Mabs neutralize ZIKV as potently as they neutralize DENY. We also found that the FLE antibodies, which neutralize DENV—although not as potently as the EDE Mabs—do not neutralize ZIKV at concentrations up to 1 μM in spite of a very high affinity for the recombinant ZIKV E protein. We further describe the crystal structure of the ZIKV E protein dimer in complex with EDE1 C8 and EDE2 A11, identifying their binding determinants. We show that EDE2 A11, which requires the glycosylation site at position 153 in DENV for binding, cannot make the same interactions with the 154 gly can on ZIKV sE, which strongly reduces its binding potential such that despite its nM IC50, it displays increased ADE as described in Example 1.

    [0641] A ZIKV-DENV super serogroup

    [0642] Phylogenetic analyses of the main human pathogenic flaviviruses using the amino acid sequences of the viral RNA polymerase NS5 indicate a clustering of ZIKV with the group of mosquito-borne encephalitic viruses (FIG. 1a). Interestingly, this clustering is different when the amino acid sequences of the E protein are considered, with ZIKV branching with the DENV group. To see if this clustering could be reflected in the interaction with the antibodies, we used bio-layer interferometry (BLI) with an Octet instrument to measure the affinity of the poorly neutralizing, cross-reactive FLE and the potently neutralizing EDE MAbs for the recombinant soluble ZIKV E ectodomain (ZIKV sE) produced in insect cells (see Online Methods). In contrast to DENV sE, which was essentially monomeric in solution as monitored by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and was converted to dimer upon binding by the EDE antibody fragments.sup.30, ZIKV sE behaved as a dimer in SEC (ED. FIG. 1b).

    [0643] The BLI experiments were done using three antibodies, EDE1 C8, EDE2 A11 and a representative FLE antibody, P6B10. The FLE Mab bound with almost one log higher affinity with respect to EDE1 C8 (1.5nM vs 9nM), and about 3 logs higher than EDE2 A11, which had a dissociation constant close to the μM range (FIG. 1b and ED FIG. 1a). Consistent with their binding affinities, we were able to isolate a ZIKV sE/C8 Fab complex by SEC, whereas no such complex was observed for A11 (ED FIG. 1b). Neutralization assays in African green monkey (VERO) cells using these and other members of the three antibody subsets, showed that the EDE1 antibodies strongly neutralized ZIKV, whereas the EDE2 were at least one log less potent. In spite of its strong binding affinity, P6B10 did not neutralize in the concentration range used, nor did any of the two other FLE antibodies tested (FIG. 2). The EDE1 Mabs neutralized better the African strain HD78788, which has over the years been cell-culture adapted and passaged in suckling mice brain, and lacks E glycosylation. But the PF13 strain isolated in French Polynesia in 2013 and in which the E protein is glycosylated in the 150 loop, at position 154, was neutralized by EDE1 Mabs with an IC50 comparable (and often lower) than that of the four serotypes of DENV (see summary in Table 1). The EDE2 Mabs showed no difference in neutralization of the two strains, suggesting that the presence of the N154 glycan in the ZIKV E protein did not enhance the interaction, contrary to DENV.

    [0644] The immune complexes of ZIKV with EDE bnAbs

    [0645] The crystallization conditions, the crystals obtained and the structure determination are described in the Online Methods section and are summarized in ED Table 1 (ED FIG. 6(d)). The crystals of the complexes of ZIKV sE with EDE1 C8 and EDE2 A11 were obtained with scFv and Fab fragments, respectively. The average resolution of the structures are 2.7 A and 2.9 A (respectively) and 3.1 A for the structure of unliganded ZIKV sE dimer. The diffraction pattern was anisotropic in the three crystals; the resolution limits in the three orthogonal directions are quoted in ED Table 1. In the structure of unliganded ZIKV, the 150 loop is ordered, contrary to the recently determined structure of ZIKV sE produced in bacteria and in vitro re-folded, which behaved as a monomer in solution.sup.31, indicating that the glycan helps structure the loop and also promotes sE dimerization, as we observed a dimer in SEC.

    [0646] As expected, the antibodies recognize a quaternary epitope in the ZIKV sE dimer in the same way they recognize the DENY serotype 2 (DENV-2) sE dimer described earlier.sup.30.

    [0647] The antibody contacts per E amino acid on the ZIKV and DENV-2 sE alignment are displayed in ED FIG. 2, while the E protein contacts on the sequence of the antibodies are shown in ED FIG. 3. The pattern is, as expected, very similar, with the few regions in which it is different highlighted in red frames in the Figure. Both epitopes in the sE dimer are occupied in the case of the complex with C8 (FIG. 3) whereas in the case of A11, only one site was found occupied (FIG. 4), although the conformations of occupied and unoccupied epitopes are similar. Inspection of the crystal environment showed that a second Fab could not be docked at this position without clashing with neighboring complexes in the crystal. This observation indicates that crystal growth selected for incorporation of sE dimers with a single Fab bound, which is facilitated by the low affinity of A11.

    [0648] The binding angles of the MAbs to ZIKV sE are different compared to DENV-2 sE (see insets in FIGS. 3 and 4). In the case of the C8 complex, the difference in angle results mainly from an altered curvature of the sE dimer. We note that the conformation of ZIKV sE in complex with the antibodies is very similar to the one it adopts on the virus particle, with roughly 1.5 Å root mean square deviation (RMSD) for 790 Cα atoms (see ED Table 2, Ed FIG. 6(e)). The unbound ZIKV sE crystallized here displays a more distant conformation (2.5 Å RMSD when comparing to both virion ZIKV E and either sE antibody complex), suggesting that the antibodies stabilize a conformation more close to that in the viral particle. In contrast, the same comparisons done for DENV-2 sE, alone or in complex with the antibodies result in RMSD values of 5-7 A with respect to its conformation on the virion observed by cryo-EM. In those structures, the curvature of the sE dimer is strikingly different to that on the virion (FIGS. 3 and 4 insets), a feature that is likely related to the absence of the interactions with the underlying stem a-helices and with the M protein (the membrane-anchored remnant of prM after furin cleavage) on the virion.

    [0649] For comparison, superposition of the ectodomain of virion E from ZIKV and DENV-2 results in a similar 1.5 Å RMSD, indicating that they are presented roughly in the same way, but that DENV sE is more deformable in solution. This malleability may reflect the high conformational breathing reported for DENV E.sup.22. In contrast, the conformation of the E ectodomain in ZIKV seems to be more stable, remaining the same in the absence of additional interactions on the virion. This feature may be linked to the higher stability of the ZIKV virion described recentlyl.sup.17.

    [0650] EDE1 C8 complex

    [0651] The total buried surface area (BSA) of EDE1 in the complex with ZIKV sE is about 900 Å.sup.2, compared to about 1300 Å.sup.2 in the DENV-2 sE complex (ED Table 3) (ED FIG. 6(f)). The conservation of the epitope area is shown in FIG. 3d, and FIGS. 3e and 3f compare the C8 footprint on ZIKV and DENV sE. The glycan at position N67, which was ordered in the DENV-2 sE structure (FIG. 3c), accounts for around two-thirds of the overall difference in footprint area. The N67 glycan interacts with the framework region 2 of the heavy chain (FRH2), and its absence in ZIKV sE shows that these contacts are not essential for binding. The key cluster of interactions that is maintained is centered on β-strand b of domain II, with side chains from CDRs H2, H3 and L3 recognizing all the available hydrogen bond donors (NH atoms) and acceptors (main chain carbonyls) of the bdc β-sheet edge (FIGS. 3b and 3c). In addition, the fusion loop main chain (which contains several glycine residues) and the disulfide bond between Cys74 and Cys105, are framed by aromatic side chains of the CDRs L1 and L3 (see also ED FIG. 1). Residues from these two CDRs also recognize strictly conserved side chains of the fusion loop (Arg 99) or nearby (Gln 77). Across the dimer interface, and similar to the complex with DENV2, the 150 loop is partially disordered, with no detectable density for the N154 glycan. As shown in ED FIG. 4, the interactions with domains I, II and III across the dimer interface are different, because of the difference in sequence: in the DENV-2 sE complex, these contacts were made with β-strands A and B of domain III, but in ZIKV they mainly involve Lys 373 from β-strand E interacting with CDRs L1 and L2, with a network of direct or water-mediated hydrogen bonds (ED FIGS. 4b and 4c). Similarly, a number of charged residues in domain I and from the nearby kl loop of domain II across the interface, contribute to the binding and interact with the heavy chain CDRs H2 and H3 (ED FIGS. 4e and f). All the polar interactions between C8 and ZIKV sE are listed in ED Tables 4 and 5, and the electrostatic surface of the epitope is displayed in ED FIG. 5, left panel. In summary, these observations place the conserved cluster of contacts with the b strand and the fusion loop in domain II as the main binding determinants of C8, with additional contacts from across the dimer interface—or from the N67 glycan in DENV—further stabilizing but not determining the interaction.

    [0652] EDE2 A11 complex

    [0653] The A11 antibody binds at a very different angle than seen with DENV-2 sE, even accounting for the difference in sE dimer curvature. The contacts along the b-strand are preserved, but the antibody makes a different angle the strand (FIG. 4b). Compared to C8, the b strand is recognized only at its end (residues 71 and 73), whereas C8 recognizes it all along, from residue 68 (or from 67 in DENV). Because the contacts with the glycan on the 150 loop are also important for binding, the observed tilted binding of A11 is likely related to the shifted position of the 154 glycan compared to the 153 glycan in DENY. The details of the hydrogen bond interactions are less well defined in the complex with DENV-2 sE, because of the more limited resolution of 3.8Å. Yet it is clear that there is a different set of contacts with the glycan (FIG. 4c and ED FIG. 6b). In the DENV2 sE/A11 complex, the glycan is recognized by an α-helix in the long CDR3 loop. In the case of ZIKV sE, there is an insertion preceding the glycan site, which results in a shift of about 6-7Å, such that it cannot make the same interactions with the CDR H3 α-helix. Importantly, comparison with the structure of ZIKV on the virion or with unbound glycosylated ZIKV sE shows that the 150 loop is well ordered (ED FIG. 6a), and that it is induced into disorder by the EDE1 antibodies, as was the case for the DENV2 virus. ED FIG. 6c shows the clash with C8 would the glycan chain had remained in place.

    [0654] Discussion

    [0655] Our results identify the structural details of a quaternary epitope that provides a previously unrecognized link of potent cross-neutralization between Zika and dengue viruses, and thus identifies an antigenic flavivirus cluster beyond the traditional serocomplexes. This relationship defines a super serogroup on the basis of strong cross-neutralization through a conserved epitope that had not been recognized using polyclonal sera.sup.21. This work thus lays the foundation for the rational design of a universal vaccine that can protect against all the viruses from this group.

    [0656] Vaccine design against dengue virus has been hampered by the heterogeneity of DENV particles and the need to use polyvalent formulas to immunize against all four serotypes.sup.32,33. One feature of DENV is that it undergoes incomplete furin maturation cleavage of prM in many cell types, giving rise to heterogeneous mosaic particles with an immature-like spiky patch on one side and a smooth mature-like region on the opposite side.sup.34. These particles are infectious, as they can fuse with the cellular membrane through the smooth, mature side. Because the FLE is exposed in immature regions.sup.35, an overwhelming antibody response in DENV infected patients is directed against it.sup.36. These highly cross-reactive antibodies coat the particles essentially on the “immature side”.sup.35, and therefore are weakly neutralizing, relying on the “breathing” effect of the E dimers to bind and neutralize on the mature, infectious side.sup.37-39. The high avidity of the FLE antibody for the E protein, as exemplified by Mab P6B10 (FIG. 1), and the fact that it is non- or very poorly neutralizing (FIG. 2), suggest that it is likely to bind only to immature patches on ZIKV particles. A recently published structure of monomeric Zika sE in complex with a FLE-specific Mab of low neutralizing activity indeed shows that its binding site would be occluded in the dimeric E protein on mature infectious virions.sup.31. The observation that Mab P6B10 and other FLE antibodies still neutralize DENV.sup.27 suggests that the mature patches may have different “breathing” kinetics, fast in DENV and slow in ZIKV, as suggested by the high thermal stability of ZIKV reported recently.sup.17, allowing it to more rapidly coat the mature patches in DENV but not in ZIKV to neutralize.

    [0657] Our data suggest that developing an epitope-focused vaccine against the ZIKV/DENV super-serogroup is a viable approach. It is clear from our results that the epitope targeted by the EDE1 bnAbs is best suited for this purpose, in stark contrast with the FLE, which induces poorly neutralizing and strong infection enhancing antibodies.sup.26-28. The EDE2 antibodies were also shown to induce ADE.sup.26, in line with their poor avidity for the sE dimer (FIG. 1). The EDE1 is more extended on the E surface than the EDE2 (see comparison in ED FIG. 5) and does not rely on the presence of glycan, with the shift in the 154 glycan in ZIKV being the likely reason why it binds so poorly. In contrast, although EDE1 Mabs require a dimer to bind, the contact points in the adjacent subunit in the dimer do not appear to be important determinants of the interaction, provided that they are not incompatible with Mab binding, with the actual determinants centered on the b strand and on the highly conserved E dimer exposed elements of the fusion loop only. As the main chain is strictly conserved, with no amino acid insertions nor deletions observed in the polypeptide chain in the region of the b strand in any flavivirus, the potential to extend this approach to other flaviviruses is high. Such an approach would be a powerful alternative to the multi-immunogen approaches against the DENV cluster that have had limited success in clinical trials.sup.40. Finally, our study also suggests that the EDE1 antibodies carrying the “LALA” mutation in the effector site to eliminate all remaining ADE effect could be useful for immune prophylaxis for pregnant women at risk of contracting ZIKV infection.

    REFERENCES

    [0658] 1 Brasil, P. et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro—Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1602412 (2016). [0659] 2 Faria, N. R. et al. Zika virus in the Americas: Early epidemiological and genetic findings. Science 352, 345-349, doi:10.1126/science.aaf5036 (2016). [0660] 3 Zanluca, C. et al. First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 110, 569-572, doi:10.1590/0074-02760150192 (2015). [0661] 4 Broutet, N. et al. Zika Virus as a Cause of Neurologic Disorders. N Engl J Med 374, 1506-1509, doi:10.1056/NEJMp1602708 (2016). [0662] 5 Cao-Lormeau, V. M. et al. Guillain-Barre Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study. Lancet 387, 1531-1539, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00562-6 (2016). [0663] 6 WHO. WHO Director-General summarizes the outcome of the Emergency Committee regarding clusters of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome, 2016). [0664] 7 Paixao, E. S., Barreto, F., da Gloria Teixeira, M., da Conceicao, N. C. M. & Rodrigues, L. C. History, Epidemiology, and Clinical Manifestations of Zika: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health 106, 606-612, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303112 (2016). [0665] 8 D'Ortenzio, E. et al. Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. N Engl JMed, doi:10.1056/NEJMc1604449 (2016). [0666] 9 Foy, B. D. et al. Probable non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 17, 880-882, doi:10.3201/eid1705.101939 (2011). [0667] 10 WHO. Situation Report: Zika virus microcephaly Guillain-Barré syndrome 5 May 2016, (2016). [0668] 11 Lindenbach, B., Murray, C., Thiel, H. & Rice, C. Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication. 6th edn, Vol. 1 1101-1152 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013). [0669] 12 Li, L. et al. The flavivirus precursor membrane-envelope protein complex: structure and maturation. Science 319, 1830-1834, doi:10.1126/science.1153263 (2008). [0670] 13 Stadler, K., Allison, S. L., Schalich, J. & Heinz, F. X. Proteolytic activation of tick-borne encephalitis virus by furin. J Virol 71, 8475-8481 (1997). [0671] 14 Yu, I. M. et al. Structure of the immature dengue virus at low pH primes proteolytic maturation. Science 319, 1834-1837, doi:10.1126/science.1153264 (2008). [0672] 15 Kuhn, R. J. et al. Structure of dengue virus: implications for flavivirus organization, maturation, and fusion. Cell 108, 717-725 (2002). [0673] 16 Zhang, X. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the mature dengue virus at 3.5-A resolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20, 105-110, doi:10.1038/nsmb.2463 (2013). [0674] 17 Kostyuchenko, V. A. et al. Structure of the thermally stable Zika virus. Nature, doi:10.1038/nature17994 (2016). [0675] 18 Sirohi, D. et al. The 3.8 A resolution cryo-EM structure of Zika virus. Science 352, 467-470, doi:10.1126/science.aaf5316 (2016). [0676] 19 Mukhopadhyay, S., Kim, B. S., Chipman, P. R., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. Structure of West Nile virus. Science 302, 248, doi:10.1126/science.1089316 (2003). [0677] 20 Zhang, W., Kaufmann, B., Chipman, P. R., Kuhn, R. J. & Rossmann, M. G. Membrane curvature in flaviviruses. J Struct Biol 183, 86-94, doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2013.04.005 (2013). [0678] 21 Calisher, C. H. et al. Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross-neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J Gen Virol 70 (Pt 1), 37-43, doi:10.1099/0022-1317-70-1-37 (1989). [0679] 22 Kuhn, R. J., Dowd, K. A., Beth Post, C. & Pierson, T. C. Shake, rattle, and roll: Impact of the dynamics of flavivirus particles on their interactions with the host. Virology 479-480, 508-517, doi:10.1016/j.viro1.2015.03.025 (2015). [0680] 23 Stiasny, K., Kiermayr, S., Holzmann, H. & Heinz, F. X. Cryptic properties of a cluster of dominant flavivirus cross-reactive antigenic sites. J Virol 80, 9557-9568, doi:10.1128/JVI.00080-06 (2006). [0681] 24 Vogt, M. R. et al. Poorly neutralizing cross-reactive antibodies against the fusion loop of West Nile virus envelope protein protect in vivo via Fcgamma receptor and complement-dependent effector mechanisms. J Virol 85, 11567-11580, doi:10.1128/JVI.05859-11 (2011). [0682] 25 Balsitis, S. J. et al. Lethal antibody enhancement of dengue disease in mice is prevented by Fc modification. PLoS Pathog 6, e1000790, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000790 (2010). [0683] 26 Dejnirattisai, W. et al. Dengue serocrossreactivity drives antibody dependent enhancement of Zika virus infection. (Submitted, related manuscript) (2016). [0684] 27 Dejnirattisai, W. et al. A new class of highly potent, broadly neutralizing antibodies isolated from viremic patients infected with dengue virus. Nat Immunol 16, 170-177, doi:10.1038/ni.3058 (2015). [0685] 28 Goncalvez, A. P., Engle, R. E., St Claire, M., Purcell, R. H. & Lai, C. J. Monoclonal antibody-mediated enhancement of dengue virus infection in vitro and in vivo and strategies for prevention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 9422-9427, doi:10.1073/pnas.0703498104 (2007). [0686] 29 Halstead, S. B. In vivo enhancement of dengue virus infection in rhesus monkeys by passively transferred antibody. J Infect Dis 140, 527-533 (1979). [0687] 30 Rouvinski, A. et al. Recognition determinants of broadly neutralizing human antibodies against dengue viruses. Nature 520, 109-113, doi:10.1038/nature14130 (2015). [0688] 31 Dai, L. et al. Structures of the Zika Virus Envelope Protein and Its Complex with a Flavivirus Broadly Protective Antibody. Cell Host Microbe, doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.013 (2016). [0689] 32 Sabchareon, A., Wallace, D., Lang, J., Bouckenooghe, A. & Moureau, A. Efficacy of tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren—Authors' reply. Lancet 381, 1094-1095, doi:10.1016/50140-6736(13)60755-2 (2013). [0690] 33 Vannice, K. S., Durbin, A. & Hombach, J. Status of vaccine research and development of vaccines for dengue. Vaccine, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.073 (2016). [0691] 34 Plevka, P. et al. Maturation of flaviviruses starts from one or more icosahedrally independent nucleation centres. EMBO Rep 12, 602-606, doi:10.1038/embor.2011.75 (2011). [0692] 35 Cherrier, M. V. et al. Structural basis for the preferential recognition of immature flaviviruses by a fusion-loop antibody. EMBO J 28, 3269-3276, doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.245 (2009). [0693] 36 Beltramello, M. et al. The human immune response to Dengue virus is dominated by highly cross-reactive antibodies endowed with neutralizing and enhancing activity. Cell Host Microbe 8, 271-283, doi:10.1016/j.chom.2010.08.007 (2010). [0694] 37 Dowd, K. A., Mukherjee, S., Kuhn, R. J. & Pierson, T. C. Combined effects of the structural heterogeneity and dynamics of flaviviruses on antibody recognition. J Virol 88, 11726-11737, doi:10.1128/JVI.01140-14 (2014). [0695] 38 Lee, P. D. et al. The Fc region of an antibody impacts the neutralization of West Nile viruses in different maturation states. J Virol 87, 13729-13740, doi:10.1128/JVI.02340-13 (2013). [0696] 39 Mukherjee, S. et al. Mechanism and significance of cell type-dependent neutralization of flaviviruses. J Virol 88, 7210-7220, doi:10.1128/JVI.03690-13 (2014). Capeding, M. R. et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children in Asia: a phase 3, randomised, observer-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 384, 1358-1365, doi: 10.1016/SO140-6736(14)61060-6 (2014). Hessell, A. J. et al. Fc receptor but not complement binding is important in antibody protection against HIV. Nature 449, 101-104, doi:10.1038/nature06106 (2007).

    [0697] Methods

    [0698] Recombinant production of ZIKV sE protein. Recombinant Zika virus sE protein (strain H/PF/2013, GenBank accession no. KJ776791) was produced with a tandem strep-tag in the Drosophila Expression System (Invitrogen) as described previously.sup.42,43. A chemically synthesized DNA fragment (GeneArt) containing the Zika sE sequence (amino acid 1-408) was cloned into the expression vector pT389.sup.44 that encodes the export signal sequence BIP, an enterokinase cleavage site and the strep-tag. Drosophila Schneider 2 cells were stably transfected using blasticidin for selection. Protein expression was induced by the addition of CuSO4 and supernatants were harvested 7-10 days after induction. Antigens were purified via affinity chromatography with Streptactin columns (IBA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A final purification gel filtration step used a Superdex increase 200 10/300 GL column equilibrated in 50 mM Tris pH8, 500 mM NaCl.

    [0699] Production of antigen-binding (Fab) and single-chain Fv (scFv) fragments of the bnAbs. The bnAb fragments were cloned into plasmids for expression as Fab.sup.45 and scFv.sup.46 in Drosophila S2 cells. The constructs contain a tandem strep tag fused at the C terminus (only of the heavy chain in the case of the Fab) for affinity purification. The purification protocol included a Streptactin affinity column followed by gel filtration as described above.

    [0700] Immune complex formation and isolation. The purified ZIKV sE protein was mixed with Fab A11 or scFv C8 (in approximately twofold molar excess) in standard buffer (500 mM NaCl, Tris 50 mM pH 8.0). The volume was brought to 0.5 ml by centrifugation in a Vivaspin 10 kDa cutoff; after 30 min incubation at 4° C., the complex was separated from excess Fab or scFv by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) for ZIKV sE and scFv C8. For ZIKV sE and Fab A11 no apparent complex formation could be seen in SEC; therefore a solution containing sE at a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml and Fab A11 at a concentration of 3 mg/ml (corresponding to a molar ratio ˜1:2 antigen:antibody) was directly used for crystallization. In all cases, the buffer was exchanged to 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM Tris, pH 8 for crystallization trials. The protein concentrations used for crystallization, determined by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm and using an extinction coefficient estimated from the amino-acid sequences, are listed in Extended Data Table 1.

    [0701] Real-time biolayer interferometry binding assays. The interactions of purified ZIKV E protein with Mabs IgG FLE P6B10, IgG EDE1 C8, IgG EDE2 A11, and control Mabs IgG 28C (an anti-Influenza virus) and IgG K9 (an anti-Chikungunya virus) were monitored in real-time using a Bio-layer interferometry Octet-Red384 device (Pall ForteBio). Anti-human IgG Fc capture biosensors (Pall ForteBio) were loaded for 10min at 1000 rpm shaking speed using antibodies at 5 μg/ml in assay buffer (PBS+0.2 mg/ml BSA+tween 0.01%). Unbound antibodies were washed away for 1 min in assay buffer. IgG-loaded sensors were then incubated for 15 min at 1200 rpm in the absence and presence of two fold serially diluted ZIKV sE protein concentrations in assay buffer. Molar concentrations were calculated for the sE protein in a dimeric form. For Mabs FLE P6B10, EDE1 C8 and EDE2 A11, the following ZIKV sE concentration ranges: 50-0.78 nM, 200-3.125 nM and 3200-50 nM, were respectively used. Reference binding experiments were carried out in parallel on sensors loaded with control IgGs (28C and K9). Dissociation of the complexes formed was then monitored for 10 min by dipping sensors in assay buffer alone. Operating temperature was maintained at 25° C. The real-time data was analyzed using Scrubber 2.0 (Biologic Software) and Biaevaluation 4.1 (GE Healthcare). Specific signals were obtained by double-referencing, ie subtracting non-specific signals measured on non-specific IgG-loaded sensors and buffer signals on specific IgG-loaded sensors. Association and dissociation profiles, as well as steady-state signal vs concentration curves, were fitted assuming a 1 :1 binding model.

    [0702] Crystallization and X-ray structure determinations. The crystallization and cryo-cooling conditions for diffraction data collection are listed in Extended Data Table 1 (Example 2 ED FIG. 6D). Crystallization trials were performed in sitting drops of 400 nl. Drops were formed by mixing equal volumes of the protein and reservoir solution in 96 wells Greiner plates, using a Mosquito robot and monitored by a Rock-Imager. Crystals were optimized using a robotized Matrix Maker and Mosquito setups on 400 nl sitting or hanging drops, or manually in 24-well plates using 2-3 μl hanging drops.

    [0703] Because of the strong anisotropy of the crystals (see results for anisotropy in Extended Data Table 1), an important number of crystals was tested at several beam lines at different synchrotrons (SOLEIL, St Aubin, France; ESRF, Grenoble, France; SLS, Villigen, Switzerland). The crystals having the less anisotropic diffraction data and used to solve the structures were collected at the beam lines PROXIMA-1 and PROXIMA-2 at the SOLEIL synchrotron and beam line ID23-2 at ESRF. The datasets were indexed, integrated, scaled and merged using XDS.sup.47 and AIMLESS.sup.48. A preliminary model of ZIKV sE protein was built from the DENV-2 sE (4UTA) structure using the structure homology-modeling server SWISS-MODEL.sup.49. The structures of the complexes were then determined by molecular replacement with PHASER.sup.5° using the search models listed in Extended Data Table 1. AIMLESS and PHASER programs were used within the CCP4 suite.sup.51.

    [0704] The DEBYE and STARANISO programs developed by Global Phasing Ltd. were applied to the AIMLESS scaled data without truncation of the resolution, using the STARANISO server (http://staraniso.globalphasing.org/). These softwares perform an anisotropic cut-off of merged intensity data with a Bayesian estimation of the structure amplitudes, and apply an anisotropic correction to the data. These corrected anisotropic amplitudes were then used for further refinement of both structures with BUSTER/TNT.sup.52. Please note that the Extended Data Table 1 shows the refinement statistics for the full sets of reflections truncated at the best high-resolution along h, k or 1 axis, values output from AIMLESS without the anisotropic corrections computed by the STARANISO server.

    [0705] The models were then alternatively manually corrected and completed using COOT.sup.53 and refined using BUSTER/TNT against the amplitudes corrected for anisotropy. Refinements were constrained using non-crystallographic symmetry (see Extended Data Table 1). The refined structures ZIKV sE/EDE2 A11 Fab, ZIKV sE/EDE1 C8 scFv and ZIKV sE have a final Rwork/Rfree (in %) of 21.8/23.8 and of 18.7/22.0 and of 22.9/27.5, respectively.

    [0706] Analysis of the atomic models and illustrations. Each complex was analyzed with the CCP4 suite of programs and the polar contacts were computed with the PISA website.sup.54.

    [0707] For the intermolecular interactions shown in Extended Data FIGS. 4 and 6 and Extended Data Tables 4 and 5, the maximal cutoff distances used were 4Å and 4.75Å for polar and van der Waals contacts, respectively. Multiple sequence alignments were calculated using Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.sup.55 on the EBI server.sup.56. All protein structure figures were prepared using ESPript.sup.57 and the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 1.5.0.4 (Schrodinger) (pymol. sourceforge.net).

    [0708] Phylogenic trees. The Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were inferred using 12 representative amino-acid sequences of flaviviruses envelope protein E or RNA-polymerase NS5 proteins, utilizing the LG model available in PhyML.sup.58 and a combination of SPR+NNI branch-swapping. Bootstrap values were calculated from 100 bootstrap replicates. Trees were visualized using Figtree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). The accession codes of sequences used in the tree : Zika virus (ZIKV, KJ776791, strain H-PF-2013_French_Polynesia); dengue virus serotype 1 (DENV-1, NC_001477); dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV-2, NC_001474); dengue virus serotype 3 (DENV-3, NC_001475); dengue virus serotype 4 (DENV-4, NC_002640); Saint Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV, NC 007580); Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV, NC_001437; Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV, NC_000943); West Nile virus (WNV, NC_001563); yellow fever virus (YFV, NC_002031); tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV, NC_001672); Powassan virus (POWV, NC_003687).

    [0709] Virus stocks. The African strain Zika HD78788 was obtained from the Institut Pasteur collection and the Asian strain Zika PF13, isolated from a patient during ZIKV outbreak in French Polynesia in 2013, was obtained through the DENFREE (FP7/2007-2013) consortium. Viral stocks were prepared from supernatant of infected C6/36 cells clarified by centrifugation at 3000 g at 4° C. and titrated on Vero cells by a focus-forming assay. Stocks were kept at −80° C. until use.

    [0710] Neutralization Assays. Virus neutralization by the tested human antibodies was evaluated using a focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT). About 100 ffu (focus forming unit) from virus stocks were incubated with a serial dilution of antibody for lh at 37° C. The mixture was then added to Vero cells and foci were let to develop in presence of 1.5% methylcellulose for two days. Foci were then stained after fixation with 4% formaldehyde using anti-E 4G2 antibody and anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. The foci were visualized by DAB staining and plates were counted using the ImmunoSpot S6 Analyser (Cellular Technology Limited, CTL). Neutralization curves and 50% FRNT were calculated using GraphPad Prism software.

    [0711] Methods References [0712] 42 Vratskikh, O. et al. Dissection of antibody specificities induced by yellow fever vaccination. PLoS Pathog 9, e1003458, doi: 10.1371/j ournal.ppat.1003458 (2013). [0713] 43 Jarmer, J. et al. Variation of the specificity of the human antibody responses after tick-borne encephalitis virus infection and vaccination. J Virol 88, 13845-13857, doi:10.1128/JVI.02086-14 (2014). [0714] 44 DuBois, R. M. et al. Functional and evolutionary insight from the crystal structure of rubella virus protein E1. Nature 493, 552-556, doi:10.1038/nature11741 (2013). [0715] 45 Backovic, M. et al. Efficient method for production of high yields of Fab fragments in Drosophila S2 cells. Protein Eng Des Sel 23, 169-174, doi:10.1093/protein/gzp088 (2010). [0716] 46 Gilmartin, A. A. et al. High-level secretion of recombinant monomeric murine and human single-chain Fv antibodies from Drosophila S2 cells. Protein Eng Des Sel 25, 59-66, doi:10.1093/protein/gzr058 (2012). [0717] 47 Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 125-132, doi:10.1107/S0907444909047337 (2010). [0718] 48 Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69, 1204-1214, doi:10.1107/S0907444913000061 (2013). [0719] 49 Biasini, M. et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 42, W252-258, doi:10.1093/nar/gku340 (2014). [0720] 50 McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. Journal of applied crystallography 40, 658-674, doi:10.1107/S0021889807021206 (2007). [0721] 51 Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67, 235-242, doi:10.1107/50907444910045749 (2011). [0722] 52 Blanc, E. et al. Refinement of severely incomplete structures with maximum likelihood in BUSTER-TNT. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2210-2221, doi:10.1107/S0907444904016427 (2004). [0723] 53 Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 486-501, doi:10.1107/S0907444910007493 (2010). [0724] 54 Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372, 774-797, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 (2007). [0725] 55 Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 (2007). [0726] 56 Goujon, M. et al. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 38, W695-699, doi:10.1093/nar/gkq313 (2010). [0727] 57 Gouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D. I. & Metoz, F. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15, 305-308 (1999). [0728] 58 Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic biology 59, 307-321, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 (2010).

    EXAMPLE 3

    Increasing the Flavivirus Envelope Glycoprotein Dimer Stability to Elicit Potent and Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Responses

    [0729] Potently cross-neutralizing human antibodies against the four serotypes of dengue virus (DENV) have recently been isolated and structurally characterised. See, for example, WO 2016/012800; Rouvinski et al (2015) Nature 520, 109-113; Dejnirattisai et al (2015) Nature Immunol 16, 170-177. These antibodies bind to a highly conserved epitope termed the E-dimer-epitope (EDE), which we have now discovered is also conserved in Zika virus (ZikaV), leading also to potent neutralization of ZikaV. The mature DENV particle is an assembly of metastable E dimers with a strong “breathing” behaviour, meaning that it promotes the generation of many poorly neutralizing, yet disease enhancing antibodies. We describe a reverse vaccinology approach to develop antigens capable of eliciting a protective immune response against flaviviruses, for example zika-dengue group of flaviviruses, based upon the production of stabilized E-protein dimers whilst minimising the production of poorly neutralizing antibody responses.

    [0730] The present inventors have studied the immune response to DENV infection to both understand immunopathogenesis and to inform vaccine design. This has included studying the human antibody response to infection.

    [0731] These studies have included consideration of antibodies to precursor membrane protein. PrM-specific antibodies are a major component of the memory B cell response to dengue; these antibodies show poor neutralization (maximum 30-50%) even at high concentration.sup.16,34-37 . prM-specific antibodies do not bind to fully mature virions which do not contain prM, whereas many partially mature particles do not contain a high enough density of prM to allow neutralization but yet may be sufficient to promote ADE.sup.16,38. We have speculated that the inefficient cleavage of prM may be an immune evasion/enhancement strategy, leading to the generation of poorly neutralizing antibodies directed to prM. The high frequency, low potency and high ADE potential of antibodies directed to prM has implications for vaccine design; all attenuated vaccines at an advanced stage of development contain prM, the ideal vaccine would focus responses to the E and the prM component of the response be minimized if the potential for ADE in vaccines is to be reduced.

    [0732] In a second series of experiments we have recently described the cloning of a large panel of anti-E mAb from dengue infected patients.sup.17. One third of the antibodies do not bind to recombinant E protein, suggesting a conformationally sensitive quaternary epitope and many of these antibodies showed broad neutralization of all four dengue serotypes. The bnAb anti-dengue mAb (bnAb) are amongst the most potent described to date and bind to the basic repeating envelope dimers making up the virion surface lattice, to a site that we termed the E-dimer epitope EDE (FIG. 3A&B).sup.17,39. In addition, we have identified (Example 1) that the epitope recognized by some EDE antibodies is also conserved in at least the ZikaV E-dimer, leading to equally potent neutralization making the EDE also a potential target in flaviviruses other than Dengue, for example Zika.

    [0733] Structural characterization of these antibodies has shown they bind in a valley formed between the two E subunits of the head to tail dimers present at the surface of the virion.sup.39. The antibodies make contact with a conserved surface patch at the dimer surface, including atoms of the fusion loop main chain but not its side chains (FIG. 3C). This conformational site is also responsible for the interaction of the E-dimer with prM during virus maturation, explaining its conservation within the flavivirus, for example dengue-Zika, group. In addition to their broad neutralizing potential the anti-EDE mAb also efficiently neutralize virus produced in insect as well as in primary human cells.sup.17. The latter are a probable surrogate of viruses produced in the infected human host, contain low levels of prM and are the most difficult to neutralize.

    [0734] The discovery of the EDE opens up a number of interesting future possibilities in dengue vaccine research. Current vaccination strategies use tetravalent formulations with the aim of raising single serotype specific responses against all four serotypes. The demonstration that potent bnAb are produced in dengue infection, which can also potently neutralize at least ZikaV, means that the generation of such antibodies should be a goal for the next generation vaccines. Importantly, as the response is limited to the E-dimer it opens the way for subunit vaccines consisting of E-dimers alone and furthermore, it may be possible to design a single universal immunogen, rather than a multivalent formulation to achieve this response. Alternatively, heterologous prime boost strategies may be used to focus the response to the EDE, potentially following LATV priming.

    [0735] Dengue vaccines are now at an important juncture; a large scale Phase III trial has underperformed expectations and given a concerning safety signal of enhanced infection. We consider the E-dimer can be stabilised, removing prM from the immunogen and further reducing the generation of poorly neutralising antibodies such as the immunodominant response to the fusion loop epitope (FLE). We consider a subunit flavivirus (for example Dengue or Zika) vaccine aimed at driving a potent bnAb response to the EDE also has utility against flavivirus infection beyond Dengue, for example against ZikaV infection; or against both Dengue and ZikaV infection; or against Dengue, ZikaV and other flavivirus infection.

    [0736] Possible experimental plan

    [0737] A reverse vaccinology approach may be taken to design a subunit vaccine to dengue and/or other flaviviruses. This may make use of the generation and structural characterization of the bnAb EDE epitope based on a panel of recombinant antibodies targeting conformational epitopes such as the EDE as well as linear epitopes such as the FLE and prM, for example as described in WO 2016/012800; Rouvinski et al (2015) Nature 520, 109-113; Dejnirattisai et al (2015) Nature Immunol 16, 170-177. The general aim of this plan is to generate a stable version of the E-dimer and then through an iterative structural/modelling informed design process to develop immunogens to specifically target the generation of an anti-EDE response whilst resurfacing non-EDE related areas of the dimer to reduce the generation of less protective but infection enhancing antibodies. Immunogenicity can be tested in human immunoglobulin transgenic mice (for example mice such as those described in Lee et al (2014) Nature Biotechnology Vol 32(4), 356-363; or mice such as those described in EP1360287 or EP2264163) and in vivo neutralization can be tested in murine models of DENV infection, for example.

    [0738] 1. Stabilisation of the E-dimer. The E-dimer is the pre-fusion form of E, which is presented at the virion surface in a metastable conformation.sup.40. This meta-stability is important to allow the glycoprotein shell encasing the viral membrane, which is formed by lateral interactions between E-dimers, to dissociate under the mildly acidic environment of the early endosomes. The resulting E-monomers can then insert the fusion loop into the endosomal membrane.sup.7,41. The subsequent acid-triggered irreversible conformational change of E leads to a very stable “post-fusion” E-trimer, which is the ground state of the molecule.sup.41. The energy released in this transition between a high energy, dimeric state of E and its lowest energy conformation—the post-fusion trimer—is used to drive lipid merger and allow the release of the viral genome into the cytosol of the cell. Because of its meta-stability, E has been shown to display considerable “breathing” at the virion surface under standard conditions (neutral pH), exposing to the immune system regions that are not relevant for antibody neutralization.sup.42-44.

    [0739] Recombinant DENV sE (i.e., Dengue “soluble-E”, lacking stem and trans-membrane segments) is predominantly monomeric in solution having a dissociation constant in the micromolar range. For immunogen design, the aim is to make the sE-dimer as stable as possible, rendering it inert and not exhibiting the dynamic breathing observed at the virion surface. In addition, the aim is to alter (resurface) the E-dimer surface on regions outside the EDE, to limit the extent of elicitation of serotype specific antibodies. We have now identified that the ZikaV-sE is stable as a dimer in solution, providing us with an important number of mutations that preserve the EDE, yet in a quite different context, since the rest of the glycoprotein is different enough to those of the DENVs such that the cross-reactivity may be limited to the EDE.

    [0740] For other viral diseases, capture and stabilization of quaternary structures in the meta-stable, prefusion conformation (i.e., the active form of the virion) is indeed now a key objective of several subunit anti-viral vaccine approaches. In respiratory syncytial virus, potent neutralizing antibodies to the trimeric pre-fusion conformation of the F-protein have led to the design of novel immunogens stabilizing the F-protein pre-fusion trimer.sup.45,46. In HIV, the recent structural determination of mAb bound to the pre-fusion conformation of Env will drive efforts to stabilise pre-fusion viral intermediates for potential HIV subunit vaccines.sup.47. Similar approaches for influenza-HA have shown that a recombinant stabilized trimeric stalk fragment was able to elicit cross-reactive antibodies against the virus.sup.48,49.

    [0741] Two main classes of mutants can be developed to stabilize the dimer:

    [0742] A. Disulphide stabilized mutants: We used a structure-based approach.sup.50 for triaging possible pairs of mutations for disulphide bond formation to improve sE-dimer stability. Analysis of the crystal structure of the sE-dimer from DENV revealed a number of pairs of residues facing each other with C.sub.β-C.sub.β distances under 4.5 Å across the dimer interface. We have thus identified six locations where substitution by a pair of cysteines (two of which are residues facing each other across the molecular 2-fold axis of the sE-dimer, requiring only a single substitution to cysteine). 3 of the mutants have already led to successful covalent DENV sE-dimer expression, recapitulating the EDE and binding to our panel of EDE-mAbs (FIG. 4) and in preliminary experiments induce higher neutralizing antibody titres compared to monomeric-E in immunized mice (FIG. 5). Although the ZikaV sE-dimer is more stable than E-dimers of the four DENVs, FLE (fusion loop epitope)-antibodies still bind to ZikaV, suggesting that such antibodies resulting from a previous dengue infection could enhance Zika disease. It is thus important to further stabilize the ZikaV sE-dimer such that the FLE is not exposed. We have now transferred the same cysteine mutations to the ZikaV protein, and, for example, immunization tests can be conducted in parallel, with ZikaV-sE and DENV-sE disulfide-stabilized mutants.

    [0743] Rouvinski et al (2017) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS |8:15411|DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15411

    [0744] “Covalently linked dengue virus envelope glycoprotein dimers reduce exposure of the immunodominant fusion loop epitope” also reports the inventors' engineering of E dimers locked by inter-subunit disulfide bonds, and shows by X-ray crystallography and by binding to a panel of human antibodies that these engineered dimers do not expose the FLE, while retaining the EDE exposure.

    [0745] B. Cavity filling and resurfacing mutants: Using Rosetta software.sup.51 we have identified hydrophobic cavities in the structure of the sE-dimer, and residues that could be substituted in order to fill these cavities to stabilize the dimer. These mutations will be designed manually using the prevalent rotamers looking to minimize clashes or with Rosetta software. Of particular relevance will be the domain I/III interface, which creates a binding pocket for the fusion loop of the partner subunit in the dimer. Release of domain III from the interaction with domain I is key to expose the fusion loop so freezing the domain I/III interaction is therefore an important goal. Alternatively or in parallel, de novo computational resurfacing, for example as described in .sup.52,53 can be used. This de novo approach may allow a greater variety of potential solutions to be tested. Alternatively or in addition, for example if computational approaches are insufficient, mammalian display directed evolution may be used to carry out resurfacing. For a review relating to resurfacing approaches, see, for example, Chapman & McNaughton (2016) Cell Chemical Biology 23, 543-553.

    [0746] Further mutagenesis of the selected re-surfaced genes is considered to allow determination of viable substitutions within the area of the EDE that do not interfere with binding to EDE-antibodies. We have information from previous alanine scanning mutagenesis (see for example WO 2016/012800; Rouvinski et al (2015) Nature 520, 109-113; Dejnirattisai et al (2015) Nature Immunol 16, 170-177), and residues that are not binding determinants can be substituted, as long as they do not introduce a bulky side chain that may cause steric clashes with the antibody. Similarly, additional N-linked glycosylation sites can be introduced strategically positioned to mask serotype specific epitopes while not interfering with binding of EDE-mAbs. In total, we estimate that the process of dimer stabilization and resurfacing may entail screening around 100 mutations on the best performing initial resurfaced genes.

    [0747] In total, we have identified ˜100 initial individual mutations of sE, which can, for example, be tested both in a DENV2 (for example) serotype and in a ZikaV-sE background (see for example the Mutation section above). Preliminary data suggest that DENV2 has the least stable sE-dimer, and is the most prone to breathing, whereas the ZikaV sE-protein is the most stable. All mutants can be tested for expression, dimerization and antibody reactivity. The mutants performing best can be used as combinations of pairs of mutants, which can be tested iteratively.

    [0748] Analytical ultracentrifugation can be used to determine dimerization constants in solution. Thermofluorimetry along with differential scanning calorimetry can be used to determine the denaturation profile of stabilized mutants upon heating or destabilizing chaotropes +/− EDE/Abs. Surface plasmon resonance, Biolayer interferometry as well as isothermal calorimetry can be used to determine Kon and Koff values between a subset of selected mutants and a panel of EDE/FLE-mAbs in different pH conditions. Stabilized sE-mutants can also be tested by flotation assay in presence of liposomes in comparison with wild type sE. We consider that stabilized dimers may be impaired in flotation upon acidification as the fusion loop should not be available to interact with liposomes. Finally, a subset of stabilized dimer mutants showing high thermal chemical stabilities, high affinities to broadly cross-reactive EDE-Abs, low affinities to FLE-mAbs and low affinities to serotype specific EDE-Abs and to other serotype specific Abs may be selected for further structural studies by X-ray crystallography.

    [0749] High throughput expression strategy. Recombinant sE can be produced in a Drosophila expression system; this may be useful particularly in characterizing multiple E-mutants. We have previously used 293T to produce virus like particles (VLP) through transient transfection of vectors encoding prM/E. A large panel of >100 alanine substitutions to surface residues on envelope allowed us to produce mutant VLP, which we used to epitope map anti-dengue mAb.sup.17. In addition, we have developed a mammalian system to produce sE or E-dimers in 293T by transient transfection. This, for example, can be used to produce strep-tagged sE-mutants, promising candidates can then be expressed at high levels by transient transfection in Expi293F cells for further characterization.

    [0750] We have generated a considerable resource useful in such a plan, namely the panel of around 150 human anti-dengue mAb (see, for example, WO 2016/012800; Rouvinski et al (2015) Nature 520, 109-113; Dejnirattisai et al (2015) Nature Immunol 16, 170-177). Around ⅓ bind to the EDE, 1/3 to the FLE and 1/3 to as yet undetermined epitopes.sup.17. To understand the structural determinants governing the binding of poorly neutralizing anti-dengue mAb, cryo-EM and crystallography can be used to determine the binding determinants of antibodies taken from such a mAb panel. These results can inform further modelling and mutagenesis to engineer out these unwanted epitopes whilst preserving the EDE. Interestingly, our preliminary results with one of our stabilised dimers shows much reduced reactivity to anti-FLE mAb underscoring the feasibility of manipulating recognition of the EDE vs. FLE, which have overlapping epitopes (FIG. 4).

    [0751] 3. A universal dengue/zika immunogen. Structural characterization can be used to gain insight into the determinants of the bnAbs and their interactions with E from each of the four-dengue serotypes and of ZikaV. X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM can be used to analyse a selected broadly neutralizing anti-EDE mAb in complex with stabilized sE-mutants. Within the repertoire of anti-EDE mAb we have generated, some show restricted serotype cross-reactivity or even mono-specificity and these can be characterized to understand what determines broad specificity. A cryo-EM structure of mAb-2D22 in complex with a Denv2 virion reported by She-Mei Lok.sup.54 is informative in this respect; 2D22 requires an E-dimer to bind, is specific for serotype 2 viruses (i.e. does not show broad specificity) and has a footprint similar to that of the EDE-1 bnAbs that we have reported, except that it appears to contact more residues on domain III of E.

    [0752] In summary, the results of this section can guide further mutagenesis for resurfacing the sE-dimer, helping to develop a single immunogen incorporating the identified cross-reactive elements of the EDE and eliminating those that can result in serotype specific reactivity. These resurfaced immunogens are considered to be useful for heterologous prime boost strategies that may be required to focus responses towards the EDE.

    [0753] Finally, once an or most appropriate stabilized, resurfaced sE-dimer has been identified, this sequence may be used in attempts to produce VLPs lacking prM but presenting multiple copies of the corresponding E-dimer at the surface, to increase its immunogenicity. As an alternative to the development of E-only VLPs, self-assembling nanoparticles presenting stabilized sE-dimers on their surfaces may be developed, analogous to, for example, nanoparticles developed for HIV and influenza vaccine development.sup.53,55-58,66. Nanoparticles may be produced by either genetic fusion or chemical conjugation of sE-dimers to pre-existing particles, for example. The particles may comprise ferritin, for example. In the case of genetic fusion, a single chain dimer may be created to allow fusion to a wide variety of nanoparticles or fusion could be restricted to particles with suitable 2-fold symmetry axes, for example. In sum, there are numerous options for how to present stable sE-dimers on nanoparticles for improved immunogenicity and epitope-focusing; different potential avenues may be explored.

    [0754] 5. Test immunogens in transgenic mice, for example fully human Ig mice. Transgenic mice useful in vaccine assessment have been developed, for example as described in Lee et al (2014) Nature Biotechnology Vol 32(4), 356-363. Such mice may, for example, have a completely normal immune system except the variable regions of the antibodies are human.

    [0755] Using such a mouse model system is considered to be useful for a number of reasons: 1) Most importantly, such models, for example as described in Lee et al supra are probably the closest we can get to a preclinical model of human immunization in terms of the antibody response. 2) Primary immunoglobulin repertoires have diverged significantly between species, thus specific antibody responses in one species differ in both variable region usage therefore epitope selection, consequently extrapolating function from one species to another is unreliable. There is already evidence that murine antibody response to dengue differ from human, in particular antibodies to E domain III are quite dominant in the mouse but less so in humans. 3) Repertoires and fully human mAbs can be rapidly generated from immunized mice by deep sequencing, paired single cell cloning, network analysis and high-through-put expression respectively. 4) There is also the potential to generate further potent broadly neutralizing human anti-EDE mAb in the process, which may outperform those currently available.

    [0756] Antigen can be delivered in a variety of different formats, which allows a throughput antigen testing far greater than could be justified in humans. The work may proceed via the following three phases:

    [0757] a) High Throughput Polyclonal Analysis

    [0758] This can involve the analysis of a large number of antigens (for example n=50, batched for operational efficiency) from which a subset can be selected and iterated further. For example, 5 disulphide stabilized mutants, 5 cavity filling mutants and 20 resurfaced mutant sE-dimers and 20 heterologous prime boost combinations can be examined. Since the number of different antigens is large the number of immunized mice may be limited to five per antigen. Antigen priming and two boosts with appropriate serial and terminal bleeds may be performed, for example. For maximum efficiency tissues can be banked from each animal in a form that it can be recovered and examined later, if required. A down-selection process can be followed based on polyclonal serum as follows: [0759] Polyclonal ELISA positive responses in 4/5 or 5/5 mice with titres>10.sup.−4 using native antigen. [0760] In vitro neutralization 50% titres of>10.sup.−3 [0761] Cross-reactivity of the responses between the 4 virus serotypes and Zika, for example [0762] Binding site analysis using mutant antigen VLP's and antibody competition assays.

    [0763] b) Deep sequencing of antibody repertoire, mAb expression and functional screening. The 10 most effective immunization conditions may be selected for deep immune repertoire sequencing and mAb production from antigen sorted B-cells. A total Ig-heavy chain immune repertoire may be produced using NGS and high throughput methods may be used to produce approximately 500 mAb per immunogen, which may be tested for binding to sE-dimers and in neutralization assays. Common BCR solutions to dengue EDE binding may be determined by determining Ig-H&L family frequencies in 4/5 or 5/5 animals at frequencies greater than seen in non-immunized animals. A subset of transgenic mouse-generated mAbs, that represent different BCR evolutionary solutions but bind sE-dimer EDE may be produced in larger quantities for characterization in vitro and in vivo.

    [0764] 6. In vivo neutralization. Mice deficient in type I and II interferon receptors (AG129) represent an in vivo model for DENV infection and pathogenesis.sup.59-62. Upon infection with DENV animals develop rapid viraemia in multiple organs.sup.63. Infection is associated with weight loss, thrombocytopenia and vascular leakag.sup.64,65. AG129 mice may be used to demonstrate the presence of neutralizing antibodies from the mouse immunizations described above by injecting serum or individual Kymouse mAbs (or cocktails of mAbs) shown to bind and neutralize DENY in vitro into AG129 mice prior to challenge with mouse adapted dengue-2 strain D2S 10.

    [0765] 7. Prime boost strategies. Initial studies may inform 1) whether it is possible to attain a focused response to the EDE and 2) can bnAb responses be generated using single immunogens. We have described a number of strategies to achieve this such as the design of a single universal immunogen and the resurfacing of non-EDE related parts of the E-protein dimer to destroy the epitopes for unwanted responses such as those against the FLE. However, the difficulty of focusing a bnAb response to the EDE may mean that heterologous prime boost strategies may be required to achieve this.

    [0766] Heterologous prime boost are considered to increase the focusing of responses on the EDE and drive broad reactivity. A variety of different experimental approaches can be used to achieve these objectives, for example: [0767] Use sE dimers from different DenV serotypes and from ZikaV in prime boost combinations to drive broad reactivity [0768] Use a fully resurfaced sE-dimer only containing the EDE in prime boost combination with wild type dimers. [0769] Prime boost strategies using recombinant sE-dimers and VLP's. [0770] Prime boost combinations of attenuated viruses with sE-dimers.

    [0771] In conclusion, we have presented an exemplar plan for exploring the feasibility of a novel subunit vaccine for dengue, which is also considered to have utility for other flavivirus disease, for example zika disease. Despite progress with LATV it is not yet clear that this approach will deliver a safe and efficacious product that can be used in all age groups. Until then, preclinical development of alternative and potentially synergistic technologies to LATV should be pursued. A successful conclusion to this program is considered to lead to production of an immunogen which is suitable for use or further evaluation, for example for primate and early phase clinical evaluation.

    REFERENCES:

    [0772] 1 Bhatt, S. et al. Nature 496, 504-507, (2013). [0773] 2 Simmons, C. P., Farrar, J. J., Nguyen v, V. & Wills, B. N Engl JMed 366, 1423-1432, (2012). [0774] 3 ECDC. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/zika-virus-americas-association-with-micrcephaly-rapid-risk-assessment.pdf. (2015). [0775] 4 Mlakar, J. et al. N Engl J Med 374, 951-958, (2016). [0776] 5 Carteaux, G. et al. N Engl J Med, (2016). [0777] 6 Cao-Lormeau, V. M. et al. Lancet, (2016). [0778] 7 Mukhopadhyay, S., Kuhn, R. J. & Rossmann, M. G. Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 13-22, (2005). [0779] 8 Wengler, G. & Wengler, G. J Virol 63, 2521-2526, (1989). [0780] 9 Zhang, Y. et al. EMBO J22, 2604-2613, (2003). [0781] 10 Stadler, K., Allison, S. L., Schalich, J. & Heinz, F. X. J Virol 71, 8475-8481, (1997). [0782] 11 Yu, I. M. et al. Science 319, 1834-1837, (2008). [0783] 12 Junjhon, J. et al. Journal of virology 84, 8353-8358, (2010). [0784] 13 Cherrier, M. V. et al. EMBO J28, 3269-3276, (2009). [0785] 14 Dowd, K. A., Mukherjee, S., Kuhn, R. J. & Pierson, T. C. J Virol 88, 11726-11737, (2014). [0786] 15 Mukherjee, S. et al. J Virol 88, 7210-7220, (2014). [0787] 16 Dejnirattisai, W. et al. Science 328, 745-748, (2010). [0788] 17 Dejnirattisai, W. et al. Nat Immunol 16, 170-177, (2015). [0789] 18 Guzman, M. G. et al. Emerg Infect Dis 13, 282-286, (2007). [0790] 19 Sabin, A. B. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1, 30-50, (1952). [0791] 20 World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/, (2015). [0792] 21 Guzman, M. G. et al. Am J Epidemiol 152, 793-799, (2000). [0793] 22 Sangkawibha, N. et al. Am J Epidemiol 120, 653-669., (1984). [0794] 23 Halstead, S. B. et al. Yale J Biol Med 42, 261-275, (1970). [0795] 24 Halstead, S. B., Mahalingam, S., Marovich, M. A., Ubol, S. & Mosser, D. M. Lancet Infect Dis 10, 712-722, (2010). [0796] 25 Halstead, S. B. & O'Rourke, E. J. J Exp Med 146, 201-217., (1977). [0797] 26 Halstead, S. B. & O'Rourke, E. J. Nature 265, 739-741, (1977). [0798] 27 Zellweger, R. M., Prestwood, T. R. & Shresta, S. Cell Host Microbe 7, 128-139, (2010). [0799] 28 Bhamarapravati, N. & Sutee, Y. Vaccine 18 Suppl 2, 44-47, (2000). [0800] 29 Guy, B. et al. Vaccine 29, 7229-7241, (2011). [0801] 30 Capeding, M. R. et al. Lancet, (2014). [0802] 31 Sabchareon, A. et al. The Lancet 380, 1559-1567, (2012). [0803] 32 Villar, L. et al. N Engl JMed 372, 113-123, (2015). [0804] 33 Hadinegoro, S. R. et al. N Engl JMed, (2015). [0805] 34 Beltramello, M. et al. Cell Host Microbe 8, 271-283, (2010). [0806] 35 de Alwis, R. et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5, e1188, (2011). [0807] 36 Smith, S. A. et al. J Virol 86, 2665-2675, (2012). [0808] 37 Smith, S. A. et al. J Infect Dis 207, 1898-1908, (2013). [0809] 38 Rodenhuis-Zybert, I. A. et al. PLoS Pathog 6, e1000718, (2010). [0810] 39 Rouvinski, A. et al. Nature, (2015). [0811] 40 Kuhn, R. J. et al. Cell 108, 717-725, (2002). [0812] 41 Modis, Y., Ogata, S., Clements, D. & Harrison, S. C. Nature 427, 313-319, (2004). [0813] 42 Fibriansah, G. et al. J Virol 87, 7585-7592, (2013). [0814] 43 Lok, S. M. et al. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15, 312-317, (2008). [0815] 44 Zhang, X. et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 6795-6799, (2013). [0816] 45 McLellan, J. S. et al. Science 342, 592-598, (2013). [0817] 46 McLellan, J. S. et al. Science 340, 1113-1117, (2013). [0818] 47 Sanders, R. W. et al. Science 349, aac4223, (2015). [0819] 48 Impagliazzo, A. et al. Science, (2015). [0820] 49 Mallajosyula, V. V. et al. Frontiers in immunology 6, 329, (2015). [0821] 50 Salam, N. K., Adzhigirey, M., Sherman, W. & Pearlman, D. A. Protein Eng Des Sel 27, 365-374, (2014). [0822] 51 Liu, Y. & Kuhlman, B. Nucleic acids research 34, W235-238, (2006). [0823] 52 Correia, B. E. et al. J Mol Biol 405, 284-297, (2011). [0824] 53 Correia, B. E. et al. Nature 507, 201-206, (2014). [0825] 54 Fibriansah, G. et al. Science 349, 88-91, (2015). [0826] 55 Jardine, J. et al. Science 340, 711-716, (2013). [0827] 56 Jardine, J. G. et al. Science 349, 156-161, (2015). [0828] 57 Kanekiyo, M. et al. Nature 499, 102-106, (2013). [0829] 58 Yassine, H. M. et al. Nat Med 21, 1065-1070, (2015). [0830] 59 Johnson, A. J. & Roehrig, J. T. J Virol 73, 783-786, (1999). [0831] 60 Sarathy, V. V. et al. J Virol 89, 1254-1266, (2015). [0832] 61 Shresta, S., Sharar, K. L., Prigozhin, D. M., Beatty, P. R. & Harris, E. J Virol 80, 10208-10217, (2006). [0833] 62 Milligan, G. N. et al. PLoS One 10, e0125476, (2015). [0834] 63 Schoggins, J. W. et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 14610-14615, (2012). [0835] 64 Tan, G. K. et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore 40, 523-532, (2011). [0836] 65 Zust, R. et al. J Virol 88, 7276-7285, (2014). [0837] Kanekiyo et al Nature 499(7456)102-106 (2013)

    EXAMPLE 4

    In Vivo Protection

    [0838] Anti-EDE1 mAb clone 753(3)C10 (C10) was tested for its ability to confer protection from Zika infection in the AG129 mouse model. AG129 mice were obtained from B&K (Hull, UK) and were bred at the CBS facility at Imperial College. All animal experiments were performed in containment level 3 facilities as per the guidelines of the Ethical Committee of Imperial College, under the UK home office license. Virus stock was produced as described earlier and titrated on Vero cells prior to use in the mouse model. Female 129/Sv mice deficient in both interferon (IFN)-α/β and IFN-γ receptors (AG129 mice; female, 8-10 weeks of age) were administered purified human anti EDE-1 clone CIO or isotype control 2-8C at either 200 or 50 μg/mouse, intra-peritoneally (i.p; 200 μL) 24 h prior to infection with Zika virus (Brazilian strain PE243). Mice were infected intra-peritoneally with 1.2×10.sup.2 FFU/mouse of Zika PE243. Mice administered PBS alone were used as experimental controls. Mice were monitored by daily body weight measurements and development of virus-induced disease. Blood samples were collected at days 2 and 4 post infection. Plasma samples were titrated for viral loads using focus forming assays on Vero cell monolayers. Mice were euthanized prior to body weight loss nearing 20% and/or severe illness specified under the project license as humane endpoints. Percent original body weight was calculated based on the weight at day 0 just prior to infection. The body weight measurements are represented as mean +/− SEM of 3 mice in each experimental group. The experiment was performed once and showed protection afforded by monoclonal antibody C10.