MINING METHOD
20220010626 · 2022-01-13
Inventors
- Robert John Morrow (Rossmoyne, AU)
- Ross Harpur Thomson (Mount Lawley, AU)
- Paul Jason Cabassi (Wembley, AU)
- Christopher George Mardon (Wembley, AU)
- Fraser Thomas Robert Morrow (Rossmoyne, AU)
Cpc classification
E21C37/16
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E21C41/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E21B43/29
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
E21B17/20
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A method of mining comprising the steps of introducing a mining head into a borehole fracturing the ore with the mining head and extracting the fractured ore through a borehole to a location remote from the mining head.
Claims
1. A method of mining comprising the steps of: introducing a mining head into a borehole; fracturing the ore with the mining head; and extracting the fractured ore through a borehole to a location remote from the mining head; wherein the steps of fracturing the ore and extracting the fractured ore to a location remote from the mining head are controlled remote from the mining head and wherein the step of fracturing the ore, radially expands the borehole.
2. A method of mining in accordance with claim 1, wherein the steps of: fracturing the ore with the mining head; and extracting the fractured ore through a borehole to a location remote from the mining head; are conducted simultaneously.
3. A method of mining in accordance with claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the borehole containing the mining head is the mining borehole and the borehole through which fractured ore is extracted is the extraction borehole and the mining borehole and the extraction borehole are the same borehole or different boreholes.
4. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the ore is fractured by mechanical ablation, laser spalling, flame or heat spalling, plasma spalling, water jet ablation, electrical ablation, sonic ablation, freezing ablation, chemical dissolution or leaching or combinations thereof.
5. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the fractured ore is extracted in an extraction duct.
6. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the method comprises the further step of: cooling the mine face either simultaneously with the step of fracturing the ore or subsequent to the step of fracturing the ore.
7. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the mining head comprises a laser mining head.
8. A method of mining in accordance with claim 7, wherein the laser mining head is in communication with a laser source located remotely from the laser mining head.
9. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the method comprises the further step of: generating and delivering a laser beam to a mine face.
10. A method of mining in accordance with claim 9, wherein the laser beam is continuous or pulsed.
11. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step of extracting the fractured ore is conducted by air vacuum suction, venturi, water injection and slurry pumping, mud injection and density floatation, mechanical means or combinations thereof.
12. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the method comprises the further step of: determining the location of the ore.
13. A method of mining in accordance with any one of the preceding claims, wherein the mining head is provided with means to monitor and record operations.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0099] Further features of the present invention are more fully described in the following description of several non-limiting embodiments thereof. This description is included solely for the purposes of exemplifying the present invention. It should not be understood as a restriction on the broad summary, disclosure or description of the invention as set out above. The description will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
[0100]
[0101]
[0102]
[0103]
[0104]
[0105]
[0106]
[0107]
[0108]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0109] Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.
[0110] This invention is a new mining method for extraction of ore wherein it is a “non-entry method” for rock mining. The ore is broken in situ by remotely accessing it through a borehole. The broken ore is then recovered from the borehole using vacuum, venturi, pumping or mechanical methods and processed to remove minerals of value. No personnel are required to be at the mine face in the mining process. This invention is unique in its utilization of boreholes only, to intersect, define, access and extract rock ore bodies.
[0111] Breaking of the ore in situ is achieved by a number of methods that may include mechanical ablation, laser spalling, flame or heat spalling, plasma spalling, water jet ablation, electrical ablation, sonic ablation, freezing ablation, chemical dissolution or leaching. Breaking can be achieved by utilising one of these methods or a combination of a number of them.
[0112] In summary, a borehole is drilled into the mineralized zone (i.e. ore). A specialised mining head is lowered down the borehole to the desired position within the ore. The head is activated and it fractures the ore into particles that are then transported to the surface via this same borehole that the mining head is occupying, or an adjacent borehole.
[0113] Traditional blasting methods of mining can provide fragmented ore the size of cobbles to very large boulders which require further crushing prior to grinding. Crushing cobbles and boulders is very energy and cost intensive. By contrast, the method of the present invention provides fragmented ore the size of fine to medium gravel. More specifically, the fragmented ore chips are about 1-20 mm in diameter. Advantageously, fragments of this size may not require crushing.
[0114] The ore is progressively broken and recovered in a planned sequence. Numerous mining heads may be deployed in boreholes in the same ore zone simultaneously. Numerous ore zones or areas may also be worked simultaneously.
[0115] In
[0116] In a borehole of about 200 mm diameter, the extraction duct is about 100 mm.
[0117] The mining head as such is provided with an energy supply (such as electricity, hydrocarbon, fibre optic), a power supply, an air supply, a water supply, a communications cable or a combination of these and is remotely controlled from outside the excavation void and borehole.
[0118] The mining head is capable of three dimensional movement. It can move up and down and across the mine face, or it can rotate.
[0119] In
[0120] In
[0121] In use, the laser mining head is preferably maintained about 30 cm from the mine face. As the mine face of the ore body moves with the spalling, the laser mining head may be moved to maintain the stand-off at the desired distance.
[0122] It will be appreciated that the distance between adjacent boreholes will be influenced by the method of fracturing. For example, laser fracturing may be conducted to a distance of about 3 m from the center of a borehole. In such a circumstance, adjacent boreholes may be placed approximately 6 m apart.
[0123] In
[0124] As the mining head rises, the extraction tube remains at or near the bottom of the mined cavity. As the mining head rises, fragmented ore falls to the bottom of the cavity and can be extracted. The ore fragments are removed by venturi method or a vacuum. The depth of the borehole may have an influence on the method of choice.
[0125] In
[0126] In
[0127] In
[0128] It is possible in accordance with present invention to target narrow ore veins and mine them irrespective of the shape or inclination of the vein. In
[0129] In
[0130] When undertaking a mining operation, the location of an ore body will generally be known with a high degree of accuracy. This information can be relied upon to predict the extent of ore bodies in order to minimize the amount of barren material that is extracted. Additionally and alternatively, it is possible with the present invention to monitor the content of an ore body during the mining operation. This may entail the use of in stream or mine face spectral analysis technology that may be located on the mining head to analyse the mine face surface or ore fragments as they are created. In one form of the invention, this may entail the use of infrared scanning.
[0131] It will be appreciated that the method of the present invention, may be more applicable to some ore types than others. Ores that exists in crystalline veins or lenses such as gold, silver, copper, nickel and lithium ores will be most suited to mining by the present invention.
[0132] The present invention provides the following advantages: [0133] optimisation of ore recovery; [0134] less dilution from the surrounding rock; [0135] reduction in capital expenditure on mine development; [0136] no personnel are required to enter the mining area or void leading to a significant increase in the safety of personnel in the mining operation; [0137] a small area of surface disturbance required for the mining operation lowering the environmental impact of the works; and [0138] all access and broken ore retrieval is undertaken through a borehole;
[0139] Laboratory trials were conducted on samples of granite, sandstone, basalt and quartz (200×200×200 mm). The laboratory was fully equipped with a fibre laser unit, robotic laser mount and control unit, fume extraction and other instrumentation generally as below: [0140] LDF 16000—60. Variable output 2 to 16 kW; [0141] FOC—600 μm; [0142] Lens Arrangement 1—OTS-5 optic arrangement with collimating (50 mm) and focusing lens, circular spot. Side mount camera; [0143] Lens Arrangement 2—OTZ-5 optic arrangement with collimating and focusing lens, square spot; [0144] Lens Arrangement 3—OTS-4 optic arrangement with collimating lens (32 mm), circular spot; [0145] Laser Mount—Kuka RL80 multi axis, digitally controlled robot mount (ROB01) and fixed worktable; [0146] Vacuum fume extraction system; and [0147] Compressed air lance (nominal 100 psi) focused upon the exposure area moving in lock step with the laser.
[0148] The results of the trials are presented in Tables 1 to 7.
[0149] Various traverse tests were undertaken in continuous and pulsed power modes. It was determined that slower speeds and higher powers provided the most aggressive conditions for removal of material, but care was required to avoid melting.
[0150] Without being limited by theory, it is believed that pulsing delivers less energy to the rock surface than continuous energy and as such, diminishes the material removed.
[0151] The trials constituted multiple traverses over the same surface. The term track offset refers to the lateral distance the laser moves between passes. For a square laser beam with an offset the same as the laser size, the paths traversed by adjacent laser beams are adjacent. Where a circular laser beam is used, it is anticipated that the track offset will be less than the laser beam.
[0152] The best results were observed for runs 35 and 38. In run 35, 1.1 kg of granite was removed in 155 seconds (26.5 kghr.sup.−1) and in run 38, 1.7 kg of sandstone was removed in 155 seconds (40.8 kghr.sup.1). Trial results suggest that circular collimated beams with a diameter of approximately 20 mm to 40 mm are indicated. It was observed that spalled material was generally slightly smaller than the laser beam diameter. At a target of approximately 1 kWcm-2, laser powers of 3 to 12 kW for a round beam and 4 to 16 kW for a square beam are indicated.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Granite, optic defocused to reach desired spot diameter, traverse path, meander Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 1 8 50 n/a 5 1 5 Spalling 2 8 75 n/a 5 1 5 Less spalling than run 1.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Granite, optic defocused to reach desired spot diameter, work distance 280 mm, traverse path, meander Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 3 14 50 n/a 25 1 25 Spalling observed 4 12 50 100 25 1 25 100 ms on, 50 ms off; spalling 5 16 50 100 25 1 25 100 ms on, 50 ms off; spalling 6 14 50 100 25 1 25 100 ms on, 50 ms off; spalling 7 14 50 n/a 25 1 25 Increased spalling over run 6 8 14 50 100 25 4 25 100 ms on, 50 ms off; spalling 9 14 50 n/a 25 1 25 Increased spalling over run 7
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Granite, collimated beam, traverse path, 1 track Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 10 8 50 n/a n/a 1 50 Spalling observed 11 8 25 n/a n/a 1 50 More spalling than run 10 12 8 25 n/a n/a 4 50 Spalling observed 13 8 12.5 n/a n/a 4 50 More spalling than run 12 14 8 37.5 n/a n/a 4 50 Less spalling than run 13 15 8 50 n/a n/a 4 50 Less spalling than run 14 16 3 12.5 n/a n/a 4 50 Spalling observed 17 6 12.5 n/a n/a 4 50 Spalling observed; similar to run 13 18 12 12.5 n/a n/a 4 50 More spalling than run 17 19 16 12.5 n/a n/a 4 50 Highest amount of spalling for this table 20 16 12.5 100 n/a 4 50 100 ms on, 50 ms off; spalling
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Sandstone, collimated beam, traverse path, 1 track Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 21 8 12.5 n/a 50 1 50 Spalling observed 22 8 25 n/a 50 1 50 Spalling observed 23 12 12.5 n/a 50 1 50 More spalling than runs 21 or 22
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Basalt, collimated beam, traverse path, 1 track Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 24 8 100 n/a 50 1 50 Spalling observed 25 16 100 n/a 50 1 50 Spalling observed
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Granite, collimated beam, traverse path, meander Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 26 3.5 50 n/a 16 1 32 Spalling observed 27 8 12.5 n/a 16 1 32 More spalling than run 26 28 8 12.5 n/a 16 3 32 More spalling than run 26
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Granite, zoom optic, traverse path, meander Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 29 8 100 n/a 30 1 29 × 29 Spalling observed 30 16 100 n/a 30 1 29 × 29 More spalling than run 29 31 8 50 n/a 30 1 29 × 29 Spalling observed 32 8 25 n/a 30 1 29 × 29 Spalling observed 33 16 25 n/a 40 1 40 × 40 More spalling than run 32 34 16 12.5 n/a 40 1 40 × 40 More spalling than run 33 35 16 12.5 n/a 40 3 40 × 40 Highest amount of spalling for this table
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Quartz (lithum), zoom optic, traverse path, meander Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 36 16 n/a 1200 40 1 40 × 40 Spalling observed 37 16 n/a 2000 40 1 40 × 40 Spalling observed
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Sandstone, zoom optic, traverse path, meander Pulse Track Spot Power Speed Duration Offset Number diameter Run (kW) (mms.sup.−1) (ms) (mm) of layers (mm) Observations 38 16 12.5 n/a 40 3 40 × 40 High degree of spalling