Core-shell structure with titanium dioxide core

Abstract

A core-shell structure (1) comprising a core (2) of titanium oxide and a shell (3) essentially comprising, preferably consisting, of an oxide of an element selected from a group consisting of zinc, copper, vanadium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, silver and mixtures thereof. A method for making a core-shell structure, in particular a core-shell structure (1) as described above, and the use of a plurality of such core-shell structures (1) as a food additive, a feed additive, in a feed stuff or as a medicament.

Claims

1. A plurality of core-shell structures, wherein the core-shell structure comprising a core of titanium oxide and a shell essentially comprising an oxide of a heavy metal selected from a group consisting of zinc, copper, vanadium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, silver and mixtures thereof, wherein the core-shell structure has a specific surface of at least 20 m.sup.2/g, and comprises a hydrophobic coating of at least one lipid, and wherein a concentration of the heavy metal of the core-shell structures is less than 100 ppm, and a diameter of 90% of the cores of the core-shell structures is in a range between 0.01 μm and 100 μm.

2. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 1, wherein the specific surface of the core-shell structure is at least 60 m.sup.2/g.

3. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 2, wherein the specific surface of the core-shell structure is at least 120 m.sup.2/g.

4. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 1, wherein the at least one lipid is a fatty acid, and the fatty acid is either an unsaturated fatty acid or a saturated fatty acid.

5. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 4, wherein the fatty acid is selected from a group consisting of myristoleic acid, palmitoleic acid, sapienic acid, oleic acid, elaidic acid, vaccenic acid, linoleic acid, linoelaidic acid, α-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosa-pentaenoic acid, erucic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid, behenic acid, lignoceric acid and erotic acid.

6. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 1, wherein the diameter of 90% of the cores of the core-shell structures is in a range between 0.1 μm and 10 μm.

7. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 6, wherein the diameter of 90% of the cores is in a range between 0.15 μm and 0.75 μm.

8. A method for making the core-shell structure according to claim 1, comprising the steps of: Providing a core of titanium oxide; Treating the core with an ammonium salt selected from group consisting of ammonium carbamate and ammonium carbonate and with a metal salt, the metal salt being a salt of a metal selected from a group consisting of zinc, copper, vanadium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, silver and mixtures thereof, to obtain an intermediate; Calcining the intermediate to obtain the core-shell structure; and Coating the core-shell structure obtained with a hydro phobic coating, on top of the shell, of at least one lipid, to obtain a coated core-shell structure.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein a plurality of cores of titanium oxide is provided and the diameter of 90% of the cores is in a range between 0.1 μm and 10 μm.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the metal salt is a halide, and the halide is a chloride.

11. A non-therapeutic use of a plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 1 as a food additive, a feed additive or in a feedstuff.

12. The plurality of core-shell structures according to claim 1 for use as a medicament in the treatment of diarrhea or food poisoning.

13. A food additive, feed additive or feedstuff, comprising a plurality of core-shell structures, wherein the core-shell structure comprises a core of titanium oxide and a shell essentially comprising an oxide of a heavy metal selected from a group consisting of zinc, copper, vanadium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, silver and mixtures thereof, wherein a concentration of the heavy metal is less than 100 ppm, wherein the core-shell structure has a specific surface of at least 20 m.sup.2/g, wherein a diameter of 90% of the cores of the core-shell structures is in a range between 0.01 μm and 100 μm, and wherein the core-shell structure comprises a hydrophobic coating.

14. The food additive, feed additive or feedstuff according to claim 13, comprising the core-shell structures containing copper and zinc, wherein a ratio between copper and zinc is in a range of between 1:100 to 1:1.

Description

(1) Further advantages and features of the present invention become apparent from the following discussion of several embodiments and from the figures. It is shown in

(2) FIG. 1: Schematic representation of a core-shell structure according to the present invention;

(3) FIGS. 2 to 11: Experimental results of in vivo studies conducted with several core-shell structures.

(4) A variety of core-shell structures were prepared and tested in vivo. For illustration, the preparation of a structure with a shell of ZnO and a coating of fatty acids having an overall zinc content of 10% is discussed in the following:

(5) TiO.sub.2 (5 kg) was added to water (201). The resulting mixture was stirred vigorously until it became homogenous. Ammonium carbamate (630 g) was added and stirring was repeated until the mixture was homogenous again. A solution of ZnCl.sub.2 (4325 g) in water was added and vigorous stirring was continued, during which gas-evolution and the formation of a foam-like gel was observed. After gas-evolution had ceased, the gel was allowed to stand for several hours. The mixture was filtered and the resulting residue was washed with water (three times). The solid obtained was dried at 120° C. until its weight was constant and then subjected to calcination at 400° C. The calcinated material was sieved and coated with a mixture of fatty acids (C.sub.12 to C.sub.20 saturated and unsaturated fatty acids) by spraying the material with the mixture.

(6) Upon addition of ZnCl.sub.2 to the mixture, the following reaction occurs:
5ZnCl.sub.2+5NH.sub.2CO.sub.2NH.sub.4+8H.sub.2O.fwdarw.Zn.sub.5(OH).sub.6(CO.sub.3).sub.2(s)+3CO.sub.2(g)+10NH.sub.4Cl

(7) Due to the CO.sub.2 gas generated, the Zn.sub.5(OH).sub.6(CO.sub.3).sub.2 forms as a foam-like gel that settles on the titanium oxide. After filtration and drying, the coated TiO.sub.2 is subjected to calcination in order to obtain a highly porous coating of zinc oxide:
Zn.sub.5(OH).sub.6(CO.sub.3).sub.2(s).fwdarw.5ZnO(s)+2CO.sub.2(g)+3H.sub.2O

(8) The core-shell structures obtained can optionally be coated with a hydrophobic material, in particular with a lipid, such as a fatty acid. By employing this method, various materials according to the present invention were prepared with different heavy metals, contents thereof and coatings.

(9) In the above procedure, a template was optionally added in order to increase to surface area of the zinc oxide. The template was prepared by mixing sunflower oil (100 g), Tween 20 (10 g) and octanol (10 ml) in a blender. The resulting mixture was added to the TiO.sub.2 slurry together with the ammonium carbamate. The Zn.sub.5(OH).sub.6(CO.sub.2).sub.2 was thus formed in presence of the template. During calcination, the template was degraded to afford the zinc oxide in highly porous form.

(10) FIG. 1 provides a schematic representation of the core-shell structure 1 prepared in the above-mentioned example. The core 2 of TiO.sub.2 is coated with a shell 3 of porous ZnO. Furthermore, the whole particle is coated with a layer 4 of fatty acids. The carboxylic acid residues of the fatty acids are presumed to adhere on the surface of ZnO, rendering the exterior of the core-shell structure hydrophobic. It is reasonable to assume that this hydrophobic coating protects the structure, in particular the layer of ZnO, against gastric acid when passing the pig's gastric-intestinal tract. The coating is then presumably degraded in the intestine, setting free the uncoated particle.

(11) Table 1 provides an overview of the materials subjected to in vivo testing:

(12) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Overview of materials subjected to in vivo testing Material Composition of Core- Health Condition Results Run Tested Shell Structure Coating of Animals in FIG. 1 L-Zn (50 ppm) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) none fair 2/3 H—Zn (100 ppm) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (20% Zn) none 2 Zn 50 ppm (P) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) paraffin oil good 4/5 Zn 50 ppm (S) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) sunflower oil 3 Zn 50 ppm (S) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) sunflower oil fair 6/7 Zn 50 ppm (FA) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) fatty acids 4 Zn 50 ppm (FA) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) fatty acids fair 8/9 Zn/Cu (FA) 95% TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) fatty acids 50 ppm 5% TiO.sub.2/CuO (10% Cu) 5 Zn 50 ppm (FA) TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) fatty acids poor 10/11 Zn/Cu (FA) 95% TiO.sub.2/ZnO (10% Zn) fatty acids 50 ppm 5% TiO.sub.2/CuO (10% Cu)

(13) In these experiments, the core-shell structures were used as a feed additive for weaned piglets. Each run was conducted with two groups of about 50 animals, which were fed with two different feedstuff compositions. The results obtained were compared to those of a control group (“Null”), which obtained the same diet, but without additive. The weight of the animals was recorded at regular intervals. The results shown in the figures reflect the weight after approximately one month of feeding. The dosage of feed additive was always 500 g per ton feedstuff. This generally corresponds to an overall heavy metal content of 50 ppm.

(14) FIGS. 2 and 3 summarize the results of the first experiment, in which two uncoated core-shell structures were tested. The first structure (L-Zn) was based on a core of TiO.sub.2 with a coating of ZnO. The material had a zinc content of 10%. The second material tested (H—Zn) had the same structure, but had a zinc content of 20%.

(15) The health condition of the animals was fair, which can be considered as normal for piglets after weaning. As can be seen from FIG. 2, both feed additives led to a slightly diminished daily growth rate (the higher, the better) compared to the control group. However, the results in FIG. 3 clearly show that an improved feed conversion rate (the lower, the better) was achieved. Surprisingly, the material having the lower zinc content (L-Zn) showed a more pronounced effect than the material with the higher zinc content (H—Zn).

(16) FIGS. 4 and 5 show the results of Experiment 2. Here, the core-shell structures with the low zinc content of 10% (L-Zn) were coated with two different oils, namely paraffin oil (P) and sunflower oil (S). The overall amount of zinc in the supplemented feedstuff was 50 ppm in both cases. The health condition of the piglets fed was comparably good. It becomes apparent from FIG. 4 that both materials tested still led to a lower daily growth rate than observed with the control group. However, the material coated with sunflower oil only showed a slightly negative effect. On the other hand, as can be seen in FIG. 5, a significantly improved feed conversion rate was observed with both materials.

(17) FIGS. 6 and 7 summarize the results of Experiment 3. Here, the core-shell structures coated with sunflower oil (S) were compared to an analogous material with a fatty acid coating (FA). The overall health condition of the animals was only fair. Presumably, this is the reason as to why an improved daily growth rate compared to the control group was observed this time with both samples, which becomes apparent from FIG. 6. FIG. 7 reveals that, in this case, the structures coated with sunflower oil led to a feed conversion rate comparable to that of the control group. Surprisingly, a significant improvement of the feed conversion rate was observed for the core-shell structures coated with fatty acids.

(18) FIGS. 8 and 9 summarize the results of Experiment 4. Here, the core-shell structures of Experiment 3 coated with fatty acids were compared to a feed additive consisting of fatty acid-coated core-shell structures based on ZnO or CuO, respectively. The content of zinc and copper was 10% in both kinds of material. In the feedstuff formulation, 95% of zinc-based structures were used with 5% of copper-based ones. This again corresponds to an overall heavy metal content of 50 ppm in the feedstuff.

(19) The health condition of the animals was fair. As apparent from FIG. 8, an increase of the daily growth rate could be achieved with both materials. FIG. 9 reveals that a slightly inferior feed conversion rate was observed with the material that was exclusively based on zinc oxide. In contrast, the combination of zinc and copper led to a significant improvement of the feed conversion rate. Indeed, the feed additive based on the oxides of copper and zinc led to results, which were clearly superior to those normally observed with pharmalogical levels (3000 to 4000 ppm) of conventional zinc oxide.

(20) FIGS. 10 and 11 show the results of Experiment 5. The same materials as in the previous one were tested here, but the overall health condition of the animals was poor this time. FIG. 10 indicates that both feed additives led to an increase of the daily growth rate. As shown in FIG. 11, no significant difference in the feed conversion rate between the materials was observed this time. Apparently, the beneficial effect of copper on the feed conversion rate only has an influence, if the health condition of the animals is compromised.

(21) In conclusion, a feed additive is provided, which leads to similar or even better growth and feed conversion rates than those achieved with subtherapeutic antibiotics or pharmacological levels of zinc oxide. Most notably, the heavy metal concentrations in compound feedstuffs are well below 100 ppm.