Perovskites for catalyzing oxygen
11220753 · 2022-01-11
Assignee
Inventors
- Yang Shao-Horn (Newton, MA, US)
- Yuriy Roman (Cambridge, MA, US)
- Denis Kuznetsov (Cambridge, MA, US)
- Livia Giordano (Cambridge, MA, US)
- Jiayu Peng (Cambridge, MA, US)
Cpc classification
H01M4/9033
ELECTRICITY
Y02E60/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02E60/36
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C25B11/054
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J23/002
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J23/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) system includes a bismuth strontium cobalt oxide.
Claims
1. An electrochemical system comprising a voltage source electrically connected to a first electrode and a second electrode; and an electrolyte in contact with the first electrode and the second electrode; wherein the second electrode includes a catalyst of formula (I):
Bi.sub.xSr.sub.1−xCoO.sub.3±δ (I) where x is in the range of 0.1 to 0.4 and δ is in the range of 0 to 1; and wherein the system is configured such that the catalyst catalyzes the oxygen evolution reaction when an oxygen-generating voltage is applied across the first electrode and the second electrode.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein x is 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, or 0.35.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein x is 0.20.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.5.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.15.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.1.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.05.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein δ is approximately zero.
9. An electrode comprising: a catalyst of formula (I):
Bi.sub.xSr.sub.1−xCoO.sub.3±δ (I) where x is in the range of 0.1 to 0.4 and δ is in the range of 0 to 1.
10. The electrode of claim 9, wherein x is 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, or 0.35.
11. The electrode of claim 9, wherein x is 0.20.
12. The electrode of claim 9, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.5.
13. The electrode of claim 9, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.15.
14. The electrode of claim 9, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.1.
15. The electrode of claim 9, wherein δ is in the range of 0 to 0.05.
16. The electrode of claim 9, wherein δ is approximately zero.
17. A method of generating oxygen, comprising: applying the oxygen-generating voltage to the system of claim 1.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(27) Here we report the synthesis of a bismuth-substituted strontium cobalt perovskite, Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ, which showed a record intrinsic activity for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in basic solution. OER kinetics of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ were found to have a low Tafel slope (<30 mV/decade) and pH dependence on RHE scale assuming the decoupling of proton and electron transfer during one of the OER steps. The enhanced OER kinetics of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ relative to other active catalysts such as SrCoO.sub.3−δ can be attributed to the presence of electronegative strong Lewis acid Bi.sup.3+ ions which can influence the surface charge facilitating deprotonation kinetics, and also enhance oxide stability by having lowered O p band center of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ relative to the Fermi level via partial Co reduction and inductive effect. This work demonstrates a novel design strategy for enhancement of the OER activity and stability of oxide catalysts by the inductive effect induced by metal substitution to enable efficient and sustainable energy storage.
(28)
(29) The distribution and on-demand use of electrical energy from sustainable resources such as solar energy requires storage technologies that are cost effective and involving earth-abundant elements. See, for example, Gray, H. B. Powering the Planet with Solar Fuel. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 7-7; Lewis, N. S.; Nocera, D. G. Powering the Planet: Chemical Challenges in Solar Energy Utilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S. A. 2006, 103, 15729-15735; Montoya, J. H.; Seitz, L. C.; Chakthranont, P.; Vojvodic, A.; Jaramillo, T. F.; Norskov, J. K. Materials for Solar Fuels and Chemicals. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 70-81; and Tachibana, Y.; Vayssieres, L.; Durrant, J. R. Artificial Photosynthesis for Solar Water Splitting. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 511-518, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Solar energy can be stored in form of chemical bonds by water splitting or CO.sub.2 reduction to produce hydrogen or hydrocarbons (e.g. CO, methanol and methane) as energy carriers, where oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is required to complete these reactions. These technologies are advantageous to lithium ion batteries for large-scale storage as they have high gravimetric energy, and chemical bonds used for energy storage involve elements (such as O, H, C) that are among the most abundant in the planet. In contrast, energy storage with current Li-ion batteries requires storing each electron using one transition metal ion, and thus powering the planet with this technology is limited by the availability of metals such as cobalt and nickel in the earth crust. The efficiency of these storage technologies is, however, severely limited by the catalysis of the oxygen evolution reaction, which is characterized by slow kinetics and the need for precious metal catalysts such as RuO.sub.2 and IrO.sub.2. See, for example, McCrory, C. C. L.; Jung, S.; Ferrer, I. M.; Chatman, S. M.; Peters, J. C.; Jaramillo, T. F. Benchmarking Hydrogen Evolving Reaction and Oxygen Evolving Reaction Electrocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting Devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4347-4357; Hong, W. T.; Risch, M.; Stoerzinger, K. A.; Grimaud, A.; Suntivich, J.; Shao-Horn, Y. Toward the Rational Design of Non-Precious Transition Metal Oxides for Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1404-1427; Dau H.; Limberg C.; Reier T.; Risch M.; Roggan S.; Strasser P. The Mechanism of Water Oxidation: From Electrolysis via Homogeneous to Biological Catalysis. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 724-761; Lee, Y.; Suntivich, J.; May, K. J.; Perry, E. E.; Shao-Horn, Y. Synthesis and Activities of Rutile IrO2 and RuO2 Nanoparticles for Oxygen Evolution in Acid and Alkaline Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 399-404; Fang, Y.-H.; Liu, Z.-P. Mechanism and Tafel Lines of Electro-Oxidation of Water to Oxygen on RuO2(110). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18214-18222; Reier, T.; Oezaslan, M.; Strasser, P. Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt Catalysts: A Comparative Study of Nanoparticles and Bulk Materials. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1765-1772; Sanchez Casalongue, H. G.; Ng, M. L.; Kaya, S.; Friebel, D.; Ogasawara, H.; Nilsson, A. In Situ Observation of Surface Species on Iridium Oxide Nanoparticles during the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 7297-7300; Bernicke, M.; Ortel, E.; Reier, T.; Bergmann, A.; Ferreira de Araujo, J.; Strasser, P.; Kraehnert, R. Iridium Oxide Coatings with Templated Porosity as Highly Active Oxygen Evolution Catalysts: Structure-Activity Relationships. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 1908-1915, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The development of the efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) composed of earth-abundant materials is therefore crucial for the large-scale implementation of these technologies. See, for example, Du, P.; Eisenberg, R. Catalysts Made of Earth-Abundant Elements (Co, Ni, Fe) for Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6012-6021; and Suen, N.-T.; Hung, S.-F.; Quan, Q.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.-J.; Chen, H. M. Electrocatalysis for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Recent Development and Future Perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 337-365, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
(30) Here, we employ the recently reported inductive effect associated with metal substitution to examine the redox potentials and OER activity of cobalt-based perovskites. Metal substituents with higher affinity to electrons, i.e. higher electronegativity, than parent metal ions can pull electrons from parent metal ions and lower the energy of antibonding states of metal-ligand, lowering the electron energy associated with the redox of M-ligand, and shifting the redox potential positively, which is shown to correlate with enhanced OER activity. See, for example, Kuznetsov, D. A.; Han, B.; Yu, Y.; Rao, R. R.; Hwang, J.; Román-Leshkov, Y.; Shao-Horn, Y. Tuning Redox Transitions via Inductive Effect in Metal Oxides and Complexes, and Implications in Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Joule 2018, 2, 225-244, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Here we examine the OER activity of bismuth-substituted strontium cobalt oxide, Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ, where the Bi.sup.3+ substituent possesses the highest Lewis acidity among 2+/3+ ions,.sup.16 with a pK.sub.a value of 1.58 much lower than that of Sr.sup.2+ (13.18), Ba.sup.2+ (13.36), La.sup.3+ (9.06) and Pr.sup.3+ (8.55).
(31) Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ was synthesized through a conventional solid-state route starting from Bi.sub.2O.sub.3, CoO and SrCO.sub.3 precursors as detailed in Experimental Section. Higher levels of bismith substitution were not explored due to previously reported solubility limit of ˜20%. See, for example, Knee, C. S.; Lindberg, F.; Khan, N.; Svensson, G.; Svedlindh, P.; Rundlof, H.; Eriksson, S. G.; Borjesson, L. Influence of Oxygen Defects on the Structure and Magnetic Properties of Sr1−xBixCoO3−y (0.1≤x≤0.2) Supercell Perovskites. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1354-1364, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Refinement of the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern (
(32) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Crystal structure and lattice parameters of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3-δ in different charging states. Compound Space Group a (Å) pristine Pm-3m 3.8955(1) C/20 Pm-3m 3.838 C/50 Pm-3m 3.835
(33) Cyclic voltammetry curves of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ thin films cast on glassy carbon (GC) electrode in 1 M KOH exhibited two redox peaks at ˜1.1 and ˜1.4 V vs. RHE (
Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ+2δOH.sup.−.fwdarw.Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3+δH.sub.2O+2δe.sup.− (1)
The shape of the galvanostatic charging curve for Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ is analogous to that for La.sub.0.5Sr.sub.0.5CoO.sub.3−δ as both lacking the flat horizontal plateau corresponding to oxygen intercalation in SrCoO.sub.3−δ, assuming that charging curves can adopt various shapes depending on the specific chemistry. Interestingly, for LaCoO.sub.3−δ (δ≈0), unlike for the oxygen-deficient oxides, the potential almost immediately reaches the stable value corresponding to oxygen evolution, which is characteristic for materials with full oxygen stoichiometry. See, for example, Grimaud, A.; Diaz-Morales, O.; Han, B.; Hong, W. T.; Lee, Y.-L.; Giordano, L.; Stoerzinger, K. A.; Koper, M. T. M.; Shao-Horn, Y. Activating Lattice Oxygen Redox Reactions in Metal Oxides to Catalyse Oxygen Evolution. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 457-465, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The change of the cobalt oxidation state with retention of the structure is supported by XRD analysis of galvanostatically charged Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ pellet electrodes (without carbon and Nafion binder) in
(34) Cyclic voltammetry of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ before and after galvanostatically measurements at two current densities corresponding to transfer of 1 electron per formula unit over 20 hours (C/20) or 50 hours (C/50), show that Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ samples after galvanostatic treatment (with lowered oxygen deficiency, δ) had much greater OER activity than pristine Bi.sub.0.2Sr0.8CoO.sub.3−δ, as shown in
(35) As the contributions from oxide reduction and oxidation in bulk cannot be excluded completely from OER currents extracted from the cyclic voltammetry data, OER activity of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ after galvanostatic charging for 50 hrs in 0.1 M and 1 M KOH was assessed through galvanostatical measurements, from which the specific activity normalized to the BET oxide surface area is shown in
(36) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 BET surface area and corresponding charging currents of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3-δ. BET C/20 C/50 C/20 C/50 (m.sup.2/g) (mA/cm.sup.2) (mA/cm.sup.2) (mA/g) (mA/g) 0.36 17.1 42.8 6.1 2.4
(37) The specific OER activity of galvanostatically charged Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ (δ≈0, C/50) is much higher than that of RuO.sub.2 (110) considered as a gold standard for OER, LaCoO.sub.3, La.sub.0.5Sr.sub.0.5CoO.sub.3 and Pr.sub.0.5Ba.sub.0.5CoO.sub.3−δ in 0.1 M (
(38) The redox peak of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ prior to OER was found to shift negatively with increasing pH (˜−40 mV/pH), as shown in
(39) The pH dependence of activity (
(40) For Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ, given that pre-OER redox process includes proton transfer and taking into account recent reports attributing peak around 1.4 V vs RHE for cobalt-based oxides to a surface hydroxide deprotonation coupled with metal oxidation, the potential of the pre-OER redox feature might correspond to the thermodynamic potential of the reaction of surface hydroxide deprotonation coupled with metal redox, as represented in Eqn 2 below (see, for example, hang, M.; de Respinis, M.; Frei, H. Time-Resolved Observations of Water Oxidation Intermediates on a Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticle Catalyst. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 362; and Gerken, J. B.; McAlpin, J. G.; Chen, J. Y. C.; Rigsby, M. L.; Casey, W. H.; Britt, R. D.; Stahl, S. S. Electrochemical Water Oxidation with Cobalt-Based Electrocatalysts from pH 0-14: The Thermodynamic Basis for Catalyst Structure, Stability, and Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14431-14442, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety):
[M.sup.n+-OH]+OH.sup.−.fwdarw.[M.sup.n+1-O]+H.sub.2O+e.sup.− (2)
The Gibbs free energy (or the measured potential) of this reaction:
ΔG.sub.1=ΔG(M.sup.n+1-O)−ΔG(M.sup.n+-OH)−eU+ΔG.sub.f(H.sub.2O)−ΔG.sub.f(OH.sup.−)=ΔG.sub.O*−ΔG.sub.HO*−eU+const, therefore represents the universal OER activity descriptor proposed by Man, Rossmeisl et al. (see, Man, I. C.; Su, H.-Y.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Hansen, H. A.; Martinez, J. I.; Inoglu, N. G.; Kitchin, J.; Jaramillo, T. F.; Norskov, J. K.; Rossmeisl, J. Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1159-1165, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety). Therefore, taking into account the linear relationship between binding energies of surface-bound *OH and *OOH species (ΔE.sub.OOH−ΔE.sub.OH=3.2 eV) (which are independent of potential and only describe the interaction between the oxygen intermediates and oxide surfaces), and assuming that eqn 2 correctly describes the chemistry of redox event giving rise to a redox feature prior to OER onset for Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ oxide, the measured potential of this redox can correspond to the activity descriptor ΔG.sub.O*−ΔG.sub.HO* proposed earlier, being the experimental evidence for the theoretically deduced trends. See, for example, Man, I. C.; Su, H.-Y.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Hansen, H. A.; Martinez, J. I.; Inoglu, N. G.; Kitchin, J.; Jaramillo, T. F.; Norskov, J. K.; Rossmeisl, J. Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1159-1165, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
(41) Given that some highly active perovskite oxides, e.g. Ba.sub.0.5Sr.sub.0.5Co.sub.0.8Fe.sub.0.2O.sub.3−δ (BSCF) are known to amorphize during OER and also has low Tafel slopes for OER (˜40-50 mV decade.sup.−1), we have performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging and EDX elemental analysis (
(42) The high stability observed for Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ can be attributed to the inductive effect associated with Bi.sub.3+ substitution, which is supported by our computed Density of States (DOS) of fully oxidized Bi.sub.0.125Sr.sub.0.875CoO.sub.3 and Bi.sub.0.25Sr.sub.0.75CoO.sub.3. The results show the shift of Co 3d band center of Bi.sub.0.25Sr.sub.0.75CoO.sub.3 to lower energy relative to the Fermi level by ˜0.25 eV after 25% of Sr.sup.2+ in SrCoO.sub.3 was substituted by the more electronegative Bi.sup.3+ (
(43) The low Tafel slope can give rise to much higher current densities at high potentials for Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ compared to SrCoO.sub.3−δ which might originate from enhanced surface deprotonation due to the presence of the highly Lewis acidic Bi.sup.3+ at oxide surface, whereas the cobalt is the site where binding of the oxygen species (*O, *OH, *OOH) occurs. The high Lewis acidity of Bi.sup.3+ can increase the ionicity of the O—H bonds of surface adsorbed hydroxo- or hydroperoxo-groups and consequently facilitates the kinetics if the rate determining step is associated with the deprotonation of these surface species.
(44) The OER activity of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ perovskite oxide is reported in alkaline electrolyte. The inductive effect and enhanced surface deprotonation associated with bismuth substitution results in dramatic improvements of catalytic performance compared to the parent SrCoO.sub.3−δ material is shown. A comparison of the intrinsic OER activity of Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ in alkaline media with that of the current state-of-the-art materials demonstrated that Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ clearly outperforms previously reported compounds setting a new benchmark for OER catalysis in alkaline media. The observed pH dependence of redox features and OER activity on RHE scale allowed us to deduce important details of the OER mechanism catalyzed by Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ. By demonstrating the tremendous effect of metal substitution on the performance of the materials via the inductive effect, this work also highlights new prospects for the design of the novel materials for catalytic applications.
(45) Catalytic materials useful in electrochemical systems can have the formula (I):
Bi.sub.xSr.sub.1−xCoO.sub.3±δ (I)
where x is in the range of 0.1 to 0.4, for example, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, or 0.35, and δ is in the range of 0 to 1. δ can represent the average number of oxygen-site vacancies (i.e., −δ) or surpluses (i.e., +δ); in some cases, δ is in the range of 0 to 0.5, 0 to 0.25, 0 to 0.15, 0 to 0.1, or 0 to 0.05. In some cases, δ can be approximately zero, i.e., the number of oxygen-site vacancies or surpluses is effectively zero.
(46) Compositions, electrodes, systems, and methods for carrying out the OER and other electrochemical techniques are described. The compositions, electrodes, and systems can include catalytic materials, typically used for hydrogen/oxygen generation or metal formation, where the catalytic material includes an oxide. In some cases, the oxide can be a perovskite oxide. The systems can operate with improved activity, e.g., at low absolute value of the overpotential, high current density, significant efficiency, stability, or a combination of these. The catalytic materials can also be free of expensive precious metals or precious metal oxides. The systems also can operate at or higher than neutral pH, without necessarily requiring highly pure solvent sources, or any combination. The compositions, electrodes, systems, and methods are useful in applications such as energy storage, energy use, and production of hydrogen and/or oxygen gases.
(47) Although the compositions, electrodes, systems, and methods described are primarily related to the OER, they are not limited in this way. Where a system is described as involving a first electrode and/or a second electrode (one or both of which can include a catalytic material), with production of oxygen gas via water electrolysis at the first electrode and/or production of hydrogen gas at the second electrode, it is to be understood that the first electrode can facilitate oxidation of water or another species to produce oxygen gas or another oxidized product. Examples of reactants that can be oxidized in this context can include methanol, formic acid, ammonia, etc. Examples of oxidized products can include CO.sub.2, N.sub.2, etc. At the second electrode, a reaction can be facilitated in which water (or hydrogen ions) is reduced to make hydrogen gas, but it is to be understood that a variety of reactants not limited to water (e.g., metal oxides or ions, acetic acid, phosphoric acid, etc.) can be reduced to form hydrogen gas and/or metals and/or other products of the reduction reaction (e.g., metal hydroxides, acetate, phosphate, etc.). This reaction at the second electrode can be run in reverse, in “fuel cell” operation, such that hydrogen gas (and/or other exemplary products noted above) is oxidized to form water (and/or other exemplary reactants noted above). In some cases, the compositions, electrodes, methods, and/or systems may be used for reducing hydrogen gas. In some cases, the compositions, electrodes, methods, and/or systems may be used in connection with a photoelectrochemical cell.
(48) Electrolytic devices, fuel cells, and metal-air batteries are non-limiting examples of electrochemical devices provided herein. Energy can be supplied to electrolytic devices by photovoltaic cells, wind power generators, or other energy sources.
(49) Electrolysis refers to the use of an electric current to drive an otherwise non-spontaneous chemical reaction. For example, electrolysis involves a change in redox state of at least one species, and/or formation and/or breaking of at least one chemical bond, by the application of an electric current. Electrolysis of water generally involves splitting water into oxygen gas and hydrogen gas, or oxygen gas and another hydrogen-containing species, or hydrogen gas and another oxygen-containing species, or a combination. In some embodiments, the systems described herein are capable of catalyzing the reverse reaction. That is, a system can be used to produce energy from combining hydrogen and oxygen gases (or other fuels) to produce water.
(50) A power source may supply DC or AC voltage in an electrochemical system. Non-limiting examples include batteries, power grids, regenerative power supplies (e.g., wind power generators, photovoltaic cells, tidal energy generators), generators, and the like. The power source can include one or more such power supplies (e.g., batteries and a photovoltaic cell). In a particular embodiment, the power supply can be one or more photovoltaic cells. In some cases, an electrochemical system may be constructed and arranged to be electrically connectable to and able to be driven by a photovoltaic cell (e.g., the photovoltaic cell may be the voltage or power source for the system). Photovoltaic cells include a photoactive material, which absorbs and converts light to electrical energy.
(51) An electrochemical system may be combined with additional electrochemical system to form a larger device or system. This may take the form of a stack of devices or subsystems (e.g., fuel cell and/or electrolytic device and/or metal-air battery) to form a larger device or system.
(52) Various components of a device, such as the electrodes, power source, electrolyte, separator, container, circuitry, insulating material, gate electrode, etc. can be fabricated by those of ordinary skill in the art from any of a variety of components, as well as those described in any of those patent applications described herein. Components may be molded, machined, extruded, pressed, isopressed, infiltrated, coated, in green or fired states, or formed by any other suitable technique. Those of ordinary skill in the art are readily aware of techniques for forming components of devices herein.
(53) Generally speaking, an electrochemical system includes two electrodes (i.e., an anode and a cathode) in contact with an electrolyte. The electrodes are electrically connected to one another; the electrical connection can, depending on the intended use of the system, include a power source (when the desired electrochemical reactions require electrical energy) or an electrical load (when the desired electrochemical reactions produce electrical energy). An electrochemical system can be used for producing, storing, or converting chemical and/or electrical energy.
(54)
(55) Electrodes 130 and 140 can each individually include a catalytic material; in particular, in the configuration shown, electrode 130 can include a catalyst effective for catalyzing the OER. Power source 150 is connected by electrical connectors 160 to electrodes 130 and 140. In this way, power source 150 can supply a potential difference between electrodes 130 and 140. At certain values of the potential difference, the reactions shown can occur, including the OER at electrode 130. In the configuration illustrated, hydrogen gas can be produced at electrode 140.
(56) Further details of devices and systems, including details of electrode construction, are known in the art. In this regard, see, for example, US Patent Application Publication Nos. 2011/0048962, 2010/0028746, and 2009/0068541, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
EXAMPLES
Experimental Details
(57) Synthesis and characterization. Bi.sub.2O.sub.3 (99.999%, Sigma), CoO (99.99%, Sigma), Co.sub.3O.sub.4 (99.9985%, Alfa Aesar), SrCO.sub.3 (99.9%, Sigma), Sr(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (99.9965%, Alfa Aesar), Bi(NO.sub.3).sub.3.5H.sub.2O (99.999%, Sigma), La.sub.2O.sub.3 (99.99%, Sigma), Sm.sub.2O.sub.3 (99.9%, Fisher), Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 (99.9%, Sigma), Nd.sub.2O.sub.3 (99.99%, Sigma), Eu.sub.2O.sub.3 (99.99%, Fisher), EDTA (99.995%, Sigma), citric acid hydrate (99.5%, Alfa Aesar) were used without further purification, except that Bi.sub.2O.sub.3 and Ln.sub.2O.sub.3 oxides (Ln=lanthanide) were heated in air at 600-800° C. for 6 hours for dehydration. Bi.sub.0.2Sr.sub.0.8CoO.sub.3−δ was synthesized using solid-state route starting from Bi.sub.2O.sub.3, CoO and SrCO.sub.3 precursors.sup.17. Stoichiometric amount of powders were thoroughly ground in agate mortar, pelletized and fired in air at temperatures 850, 900 and finally 950° C. for 15 h each with intermediate regrinding. The samples were quenched to room temperature after every heat treatment in order to minimize the fraction of the secondary phase of Bi.sub.2Sr.sub.2Co.sub.3O.sub.y.sup.17 which might be detected by peaks at ca. 24.sup.0 and 30.sup.0 on XRD spectra.sup.48. LnCoO.sub.3 oxides were synthesized using solid-state route starting from Ln.sub.2O.sub.3 and Co.sub.3O.sub.4 precursors. Stoichiometric amount of powders were thoroughly ground in agate mortar, pelletized and heated in oxygen flow for 40 h at 1200° C. with intermediate regrinding.
(58) Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were recorded with a Bruker Advance II diffractometer equipped with a θ/2θ Bragg-Brentano geometry and Ni-filtered CuKα radiation (Kα.sub.1=1.5406 Å, Kα.sub.2=1.5444 Å, Kα.sub.1/Kα.sub.2=0.5). The tube voltage and current were 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively. Lattice parameters as assessed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements are consistent with those reported previously.
(59) The specific surface area of each oxide sample was determined using BET analysis on a Quantachrome ChemBET Pulsar from a single-point BET analysis performed after 12 h outgassing at 150° C.
(60) TEM imaging was conducted on a JEOL 2010 transmission electron microscope operated at 200 KeV, which is equipped with a field-emission electron gun and an ultrahigh resolution pole piece, resulting in a point-to-point resolution of 1.9 Å, with the ability to image lattice fringes at 1.4 Å resolution. Fourier analysis was performed using the Gatan Digital Micrograph software v2.01 (Gatan). JEOL 2010F transmission electron microscope (TEM) equipped with the ultrahigh resolution polepiece was used to collect HADDF-STEM images and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in this work, which has a point resolution of 0.19 nm. Parallel-beam EDS results were collected and analyzed using INCA (Oxford Instruments) software. For each sample, at least three different spots with a diameter of 2 nm were used to collect the bulk chemical compositions and surface chemical compositions. Error bars of elemental compositions obtained from EDS data represent the standard deviation of the results on at least three spots. Samples of pristine BSCO were prepared by sonicating BSCO powder in THF for a few minutes. The dispersion was then drop casted on a lacy carbon grid. Samples of charged electrode were prepared by swabbing the glassy carbon surface, which was previously washed with ethanol to remove KOH remaining on the surface after charging experiments. Electrochemical measurements. Electrodes used for CV and galvanostatic measurements were prepared by drop-casting ink containing oxide catalyst powder on a glassy carbon electrode.sup.49. The glassy carbon electrode surface (0.196 cm.sup.−2) was loaded with 0.25 mg.sub.oxide cm.sub.disk.sup.−2 using the mass ratio of 5:1:1 (oxide catalyst: acetylene black carbon: Nafion). Alternatively, electrodes for galvanostatic experiments were also prepared by attaching pelletized powder (60 mg, 5 mm diameter) to a graphene sheet (0.12 mm thickness) using carbon paste. Galvanostatic charging was performed using a current density set at a C-rate of C/20 or C/50, meaning the exchange of 1 mole of electrons per mole of oxide in 20 or 50 hours. Pellet was carefully ground after galvanostatic charging experiments (
(61) OER measurements were performed with a rotating disk-electrode setup in oxygen-saturated KOH using a glass electrochemical cell with Ag/AgCl reference electrode (for 0.03 M KOH electrolyte) or Hg/HgO reference electrode (for 0.1 M, 0.3 M and 1 M KOH electrolyte) and Pt counter electrode. 0.03 M, 0.1M, 0.3 M and 1 M KOH (99.99% purity, Sigma-Aldrich) electrolyte solutions were prepared using deionized water (>18 MΩ cm). The potential was controlled using a Biologic SP-300 potentiostat. A scan rate of 10 mV s.sup.−1 was used for all CV and rotation was set to 1600 rpm. The Ag/AgCl and Hg/HgO reference electrodes were calibrated in the corresponding KOH electrolyte before OER experiments where the point of zero current from hydrogen oxidation/evolution at a platinum electrode at different rotation rates was defined as 0 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (
(62) OER kinetic currents from cyclic voltammetry were obtained by taking the average between forward and backward scans to remove capacitive current contribution, which was then corrected for ohmic losses. Ohmic losses were corrected by subtracting the ohmic voltage drop from the measured potential, using an electrolyte resistance determined by high-frequency alternating current impedance, where iR-corrected potentials are denoted as E−iR (i as the current and R as the electrolyte resistance). Galvanostatic measurements of OER activity were performed on the sample preliminary oxidized at C/50 by applying incrementally increased currents; potentials corresponding to the plateau on E-t curve were used for calculations. Error bars represent standard deviation from at least 3 independent measurements.
(63) Density Functional Theory Calculations. DFT calculations with Hubbard U correction for the Co 3d electrons were performed with the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) using the projector-augmented plane-wave method with a cutoff of 450 eV. See, for example, Lee, Y.-L.; Kleis, J.; Rossmeisl, J.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Morgan, D. Prediction of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathode Activity with First-Principles Descriptors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3966-3970; Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558-561; Kresse, G.; Furthmtiller, J. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169-11186; Blöchl, P. E. Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953-17979, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.sub.eff value of 3.3 eV was used for Co 3d states, as optimized by fitting the formation enthalpies of oxides. Energy convergence was within 3 meV per perovskite formula unit using a Monkhorst-Pack 4×4×4 k-point mesh. The soft O_s oxygen pseudopotential was employed for oxygen. Exchange-correlation was treated in the Perdew-Wang-91 generalized gradient approximation (GGA).). See, for example, Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Accurate and Simple Analytic Representation of the Electron-Gas Correlation Energy. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244-13249, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Fully relaxed stoichiometric bulk perovskite calculations were simulated with 2×2×2 perovskite supercells. All calculations were performed in the ferromagnetic state, in order to use a consistent and tractable set of magnetic structures. Both O 2p-band and metal 3d-band centers were determined by taking the centroid of the projected density of states of O 2p and metal 3d states (both occupied and unoccupied states) relative to the Fermi level.
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. XAS data were collected at Beamline 10ID-2 of the Canadian Light Source. The experiments were performed with the samples at room temperature under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions (10.sup.−9 Torr), with the linear polarization of the incident beam 45° to the sample surfaces. The O K-edge (1s to 2p) spectra were collected in Total Fluorescence Yield (TFY) and Total Electron Yield (TEY) but the reported data is in Partial Fluorescence Yield (PEY). The O K.sub.α2 and K.sub.α3 line at ˜521 eV were used to obtained the O K-edge XAS with and integration width of 120 eV. The Co XAS was obtained by using the L.sub.α2 and L.sub.β1 fluorescence lines at ˜770 eV and an integration width of 120 eV. The data was normalized to the incident beam intensity using the current of a gold mesh placed before the sample stage. The oxygen K-edge data was background subtracted by fitting a straight line between 520 and 525 eV and subtracting it from the data. Furthermore, the average of the last 20 eV (from 550 to 570 eV) was taken and was used to normalize the data. All of the XES spectra and the Co L.sub.2,3-edge XAS were normalized by making the point of highest intensity equal to unity. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.