FERTILIZERS CONTAINING SLOW AND FAST RELEASE SOURCES OF BORON

Abstract

A granular fertilizer product having at least two sources of boron having different solubilities to tailor boron availability during the entire growing season of a plant, while reducing the risk of boron toxicity. A first source of boron can include a sodium-based or highly water soluble boron compound such as sodium tetraborate and/or boric acid, while a second source of boron can include a calcium-based boron compound such as colemanite (CaB.sub.3OH).sub.3.(H.sub.2O)) (e.g. when the carrier fertilizer is N- or K-based) and/or boron phosphate (BPO.sub.4) (e.g., when the carrier fertilizer is P-based). The solubility of the first source of boron is higher than the solubility of the second source of boron such that the sources of boron have different release rates into the soil.

Claims

1. A granular fertilizer product comprising a plurality of granules, each granule comprising: a primary nutrient source; a first source of boron having a first solubility such that the granule is configured to release boron primarily during a first part of a growing season; and a second source of boron having a second solubility lower than the first solubility such that the granule is configured to release boron primarily during a second part of the growing season after the first part.

2. The granular fertilizer product of claim 1, wherein the first part of the growing seasons corresponds to a seedling stage of a targeted plant and the second part of the growing season corresponds to a flowing stage of the targeted plant.

3. The granular fertilizer product of claim 1, wherein the primary nutrient source comprises muriate of potash (MOP), and the granular fertilizer composition comprises a compacted MOP composition.

4. The granular fertilizer product of claim 1, wherein the primary nutrient source comprises a source of potassium.

5. The granular fertilizer product of claim 4, wherein the first source of boron comprises a sodium based boron source or boric acid.

6. The granular fertilizer product composition of claim 4, wherein the first source of boron comprises sodium tetraborate.

7. The granular fertilizer product of claim 1, wherein the second source of boron comprises a calcium based boron source.

8. The granular fertilizer product of claim 6, wherein the second source of boron comprises colemanite (CaB.sub.3O.sub.4(OH).sub.3.(H.sub.2O)), boron phosphate (BPO.sub.4), or combinations thereof

9. The granular fertilizer product of claim 1, wherein the first and second sources of boron are present in an amount in the fertilizer granule to provide a total amount of from about 0.001 weight percent (wt %) to about 1.0 wt % B.

10. The granular fertilizer product of claim 8, wherein the first and second sources of boron are present in a total amount of from about 0.1 wt % to about 0.7 wt % B.

11. The granular fertilizer product of claim 9, wherein the first and second sources of boron are present in a total amount of from about 0.3 wt % to about 0.6 wt % B.

12. The granular fertilizer product of claim 1, wherein a ratio of the first source of boron to the second source of boron is between 5:1 and 1:5.

13. A method of forming a fertilizer product comprising a plurality of granules, each granule containing multiple sources of boron, the method comprising: providing a primary nutrient source; adding a first source of boron having a first solubility configured to release boron primarily during a first part of a growing season to the primary nutrient source; adding a second source of boron having a second solubility less than the first source configured to release boron primarily during a second part of the growing season to the primary nutrient source; compacting the primary nutrient source, the first source of boron, and the second source of boron to form a fertilizer composition; and crushing the compacted fertilizer composition to form the plurality of granules.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the primary nutrient source comprises a source of potassium.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the source of potassium comprises muriate of potash (MOP).

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the first source of boron comprises a sodium based boron source or boric acid.

17. The method of claim 13, wherein the second source of boron comprises a calcium based boron source.

18. The method of claim 13, wherein the first and second sources of boron are present in an amount in the fertilizer granule to provide a total amount of from about 0.001 weight percent (wt %) to about 1.0 wt % B.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the first and second sources of boron are present in a total amount of from about 0.1 wt % to about 0.7 wt % B.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the first and second sources of boron are present in a total amount of from about 0.3 wt % to about 0.6 wt % B.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] Subject matter hereof may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments in connection with the accompanying figures, in which:

[0017] FIG. 1 depicts a perfusion cell assembly for analyzing leached boron from soil according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0018] FIG. 2 is a plot of a weight percent of boron released as a function of pore volume (i.e. a time series of boron leaching) for various formulations in a perfusion cell assembly according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0019] FIG. 3 is a pot trial assembly for analyzing boron availability according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0020] FIG. 4 is a plot comparing boron uptake per pot in leached treatments and boron leached as a percent of added boron versus water-soluble boron as a percent of total boron in a pot trial assembly;

[0021] FIG. 5 is a plot comparing boron uptake per pot per formulation in a pot trial assembly; FIG. 6 is a graph depicting boron uptake per pot in leached or unleached pots for six fertilizer treatments in a pot trial assembly;

[0022] FIG. 7 is a side by side comparison of canola plants grown in pre-leached pots versus plants grown in non-leached pots for different formulations in a pot trial assembly according to an embodiment; and

[0023] FIG. 8 is a process flow diagram for a compaction circuit according to an embodiment.

[0024] While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0025] Embodiments of the invention include a NPK fertilizer product having at least two sources of boron having different release rates or characteristics to tailor boron availability during the entire growing season of a plant, while reducing the risk of boron toxicity.

[0026] In embodiments, the NPK fertilizer product can comprise a macronutrient carrier including a nitrogen based fertilizer (e.g. urea), a potassium based fertilizer (e.g. potash or muriate of potash (MOP)), or a phosphate based fertilizer (e.g. mono or di-ammonium phosphate (MAP or DAP)). With respect to MOP carriers, the MOP fertilizer base can be any of a variety of commercially available MOP sources, such as, but not limited to, for example, a MOP feed material having a K.sub.2O content ranging from about 20 weight percent to about 80 weight percent, more particularly about 48 to 62 weight percent, and more particularly about 55 to 62 weight percent.

[0027] In one embodiment, a first source of boron is highly soluble, and is therefore a fast release source of boron. A second source of boron has lower solubility than the first source, and is therefore a slow release source of boron. The first source of boron can comprise a highly soluble source or fast release source, such as, for example, a sodium-based boron source including sodium tetraborate (i.e. borax), while the second source of boron can comprise a source having a solubility significantly less than the first source, such as, for example, a calcium-based boron source including colemanite (CaB.sub.3O.sub.4(OH).sub.3.(H.sub.2O)), and/or boron phosphate (BPO.sub.4). Regarding boron phosphate specifically, in embodiments, the solubility can be tailored by heating the reaction product of phosphoric acid and boric acid to different temperatures and for different periods of time at a temperature.

[0028] Another source of boron having a solubility less than the first source and greater than the second source can include, for example, ulexite (NaCaB.sub.5O.sub.6(OH).sub.6.5(H.sub.2O)), and can be used as a fast release source when combined with slower release boron sources, or a slow release source when combined with faster release boron sources. Table 1 shows the solubility of selected borate compounds.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Solubility of the different sources of boron: Boron Sources Solubility (mg/L)   Sodium borate (borax) 1504 Ulexite 886 Colemanite 538 BPO.sub.4 500° C. 1 h 285 BPO.sub.4 500° C. 24 h 225 BPO.sub.4 800° C. 1 h 75 BPO.sub.4 800° C. 24 h 59

[0029] In embodiments, at least two sources of boron are present in amounts which deliver B from about 0.001 weight percent (wt %) to about 1.0 wt % B in the fertilizer granule, more particularly from about 0.1 wt % to about 0.7 wt %, and more particularly from about 0.3 wt % to about 0.6 wt %. Ratios of fast release boron to slow release boron can be, for example, 5:1, 4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, or 1:5, or any of a variety of ratios tailored to the plant needs.

[0030] The fertilizer product, in the case of a cohered, compacted granule, can also include one or more binding agents or ingredients in order to improve the strength or handling ability of the finished product so that the granules are less likely to wear or break down during handling or transport, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,501, entitled “Compacted granular potassium chloride, and method and apparatus for production of same,” incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A binding agent is a chemical that is added into the feed of a compaction circuit to improve the strength and quality of compacted particles. The binding agent acts to sequester or chelate impurities in the fertilizer feedstock, while providing adhesive properties to the compacted blend. Binding agents can include, for example, sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP), tetra-sodium pyrophosphate (TSPP), tetra-potassium pyrophosphate (TKPP), sodium tri-polyphosphate (STPP), di-ammonium phosphate (DAP), mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP), granular mono-ammonium phosphate (GMAP), potassium silicate, sodium silicate, starch, dextran, lignosulfonate, bentonite, montmorillonite, kaolin, or combinations thereof. In addition to or alternatively to the binding agents, some of the micronutrients themselves can act as binding agents to improve particle strength.

[0031] According to an embodiment of the invention, a cohered granular the NPK fertilizer product containing at least two sources of boron is made by blending a first source of boron having a first solubility and a second source of boron having a second solubility less than the first source into a primary nutrient feed of a compaction circuit. The sources of boron can be added to the feed in advance of compaction, and can either be added separately to the feed, or can be bulk blended prior to their addition to the feed. The compaction of this blended feed stock and then conventional further processing, such as crushing and sizing, yields cohered fertilizer granules containing at least two sources of boron that are evenly distributed throughout the granular product.

[0032] A production line or production circuit for producing the compacted granular fertilizer composition generally includes a material feed apparatus such as a belt conveyor, pneumatic conveyor or the like which input various particulate primary nutrient streams, screenings, recovered or discarded material, the first and second sources of boron, one or more optional secondary nutrients and/or micronutrients, and one or more optional binding agents to a compactor. The compactor then presses the feed material at elevated pressures into a cohered intermediate sheet or cake, which can then be crushed, classified, resized, or otherwise refinished into a desired finished granular product containing the at least two sources of boron.

[0033] FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating the steps involved in one contemplated embodiment of the method of production of the present invention. Specifically, FIG. 8 shows the injection of a boron sources, either blended or separately, into the primary nutrient feed of a production circuit. The boron sources can be added to the feed material at various locations in the circuit by one or more injectors including metering equipment to allow more precise control of the amounts of each component added per unit of feedstock.

[0034] After addition of the boron sources and optional binding agent(s) to the feed material, the additives and feed material are blended. The blending step can either take place passively, by allowing these materials to come together or blend during their joint carriage through the feed mechanism, or alternatively there may be specific blending equipment added to the production circuit between the injector and the compactor to provide more aggressive or active blending of the boron sources, optional binders, optional other additives, and feedstock prior to compaction.

[0035] The blended feed material, now properly mixed with the boron sources and optional other additives, is then compacted. The compaction process can be performed using conventional compaction equipment such as a roll compactor or the like. The cohered intermediate composition yielded can then be further processed into the desired finished granular product using methods such as crushing, screening or other conventional classification methods suitable to yield a finished product of the desired particle size or type, as depicted in FIG. 8.

[0036] It will be understood that any attendant process or equipment modifications to permit the addition of one or more additional micronutrients, secondary nutrients, and/or binding agents, either concurrently or separately, to the feedstock are contemplated within the scope of the present invention.

[0037] The following examples further exemplify embodiments of the present application.

EXAMPLES

Trial 1: Column Dissolution

[0038] MOP fines were compacted with varying proportions of boron from borax and colemanite, to give a total boron content of about 0.5 wt % of the fertilizer granule. The varying proportions of boron supplied as borax to colemanite were 1:0 (i.e. no colemanite), 1:1, 1:3, and 0:1 (i.e. no borax). Dissolution of boron from the granules was measured over 72 hours using a column perfusion technique. Referring to FIG. 1, the column perfusion technique uses a perfusion cell assembly 100 in which a known weight of fertilizer 102 is embedded within a volume of soil 104 in a vertical column cell 106. A percolation solution S is pumped from bottom to top through a glass wool barrier 108 followed by the soil 104 which encloses the fertilizer sample 102 and a portion of acid washed sand 104a. The top end 103 includes a filter paper 110 so that soil is not removed with the collected leachates 112.

[0039] In this particular perfusion example, a one-gram sample of fertilizer product was embedded within the column of soil. The percolation solution was 10 mM CaCl.sub.2, having a pH of about 6, and was introduced into the column at a flow rate of 10 mL/h.

[0040] The results of the perfusion technique are depicted in the graph of FIG. 2, in which the weight percent of boron released (i.e. captured in the leachates) per composition was plotted, showing that the fast and slow release characteristics can be tailored by varying the proportions of borax to colemanite.

Trial 2: Pot trials

[0041] Pot trials were performed using canola plants, a MOP fertilizer control (without boron), and the same four fertilizer formulations as used in Trial 1, consisting of MOP with 0.5% boron and varying ratio of fast (borax) to slow release boron (colemanite) (Table 2). The soil consisted of 1 kg per pot of Mt. Compass sandy loam, the chemical analysis of which is set forth in Table 3 below. The boron source was added at an equivalent rate of 1.5 kg boron/hectare, which corresponded to 0.9 mg boron and 86.6 mg K per 1-kg pot. There were five replicates for each fertilizer treatment.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparison of acid extrable and water extractable B Water extractable Ratio B Acid extractable B as Fertilizer % K (%) B (%) B (%) % total MOP + Borax 100 45.1 0.57 0.52 90.0 MOP + 100 46.1 0.53 0.06 10.8 Colemanite MOP + 50:50 48.6 0.60 0.29 49.0 Colemanite:Borax MOP + 75:25 48.5 0.61 0.18 48.6 Colemanite:Borax MOP + Ulexite 100 47.0 0.43 0.28 65.1 MOP + 50:50 46.5 0.59 0.29 29.2 Ulexite:Borax

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Selected characteristics of the Southern Australia soil used in the experiments Soils Sand Location Mt Compass pH (water) 5.9 pH (CaCl.sub.2) 4.9 Total C (%) 0.5 CEC (cmol.sub.c kg.sup.−1) 2.0 Hot water 0.20 extractable B (mg kg.sup.−1) CaCO.sub.3 (%) <0.2 Clay (%) 4.3 Silt (%) 0.9 Sand (%) 96.3 Field capacity (%) 3.5

[0042] In this trial, thirty of the pots were leached, and thirty pots were not leached prior to planting the canola crop. Referring to FIG. 3, the leached pots 300 were leached by applying four pore volumes 302 (or 350 mL×4) of demineralized water to the 1 kg of soil 304 to which the MOP fertilizer 306 was applied at 1 cm below the surface of the soil 304. The leachate 308 captured at the bottom of the pot 300 was analyzed for boron. The amount of boron leached from the pots 300 decreased with increasing amount of slow-release boron in the fertilizer (FIG. 4). The canola plant crop was then planted and allowed to grow for about twelve weeks, and was then analyzed for boron concentration in the plant shoots. As depicted in FIG. 7, the non-leached pots 700 at varying formulations outgrew the leached pots 702 at the same formulations

[0043] As shown in Table 2, and FIGS. 2 (column perfusion), 4 (pot trial), 5 (pot trial) and 6 (pot trial), in both the column perfusion and pot trial techniques, it was observed that as the percentage of water soluble boron increases, the release rate of boron increases and boron uptake by plants decreases, while having minimum effect on acid extractable K.

[0044] Referring specifically to FIG. 6, the plant uptake of boron per pot was measured after twelve weeks. In the unleached pots, there was no consistent effect of boron fertilizer formulation on the uptake of boron. For the leached pots, the plant uptake of boron increased as the amount of slow-releasing boron from colemanite increased in the fertilizer formulation.

[0045] From these trials, it has been determined boron uptake can be improved with the balance of slow release boron and fast release boron, and that the addition of a slow release source of boron to a macronutrient fertilizer provides an excellent supply of boron in leaching environments over the course of a plant's growing season.

[0046] Various embodiments of systems, devices, and methods have been described herein. These embodiments are given only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed inventions. It should be appreciated, moreover, that the various features of the embodiments that have been described may be combined in various ways to produce numerous additional embodiments. Moreover, while various materials, dimensions, shapes, configurations and locations, etc. have been described for use with disclosed embodiments, others besides those disclosed may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the claimed inventions.

[0047] Persons of ordinary skill in the relevant arts will recognize that the subject matter hereof may comprise fewer features than illustrated in any individual embodiment described above. The embodiments described herein are not meant to be an exhaustive presentation of the ways in which the various features of the subject matter hereof may be combined. Accordingly, the embodiments are not mutually exclusive combinations of features; rather, the various embodiments can comprise a combination of different individual features selected from different individual embodiments, as understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art. Moreover, elements described with respect to one embodiment can be implemented in other embodiments even when not described in such embodiments unless otherwise noted.

[0048] Although a dependent claim may refer in the claims to a specific combination with one or more other claims, other embodiments can also include a combination of the dependent claim with the subject matter of each other dependent claim or a combination of one or more features with other dependent or independent claims. Such combinations are proposed herein unless it is stated that a specific combination is not intended.

[0049] Any incorporation by reference of documents above is limited such that no subject matter is incorporated that is contrary to the explicit disclosure herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is further limited such that no claims included in the documents are incorporated by reference herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is yet further limited such that any definitions provided in the documents are not incorporated by reference herein unless expressly included herein. For purposes of interpreting the claims, it is expressly intended that the provisions of 35 U. S.C. § 112(f) are not to be invoked unless the specific terms “means for” or “step for” are recited in a claim.