METHOD FOR PLANTING AND PROCESSING HIGH-YIELD FORAGE IN HIGH ALTITUDE AREA

Abstract

The present application discloses a method for planting and processing high-yield forage in high altitude area, and belongs to the technical field of feed preparation in a high altitude area. The planting method of the present application comprises the steps of: intercropping maize and soybeans at an altitude of more than 3000 m, and the maize varieties include Demeiya No. 1 and Demeiya No. 3, the soybean varieties include Zhongdou No. 39 and Huachun No. 6. The planting method of the present application can realize the successful planting of maize and soybeans in a high altitude area (>3000 m), and can greatly improve the biological yield.

Claims

1. A method for planting high-yield forage in a high altitude area, comprising the steps of: intercropping maize and soybeans at an altitude of more than 3000 m, wherein the maize is selected from Demeiya No. 1 and Demeiya No. 3, and the soybeans are selected from Zhongdou No. 39 and Huachun No. 6.

2. The method for planting according to claim 1, including sowing the maize and soybeans at the same time, within a sowing period from the last ten days of April to the middle ten days of May.

3. The method for planting according to claim 1, wherein a planting density of the maize is 72000-75000 plants/hm.sup.2.

4. The method for planting according to claim 1, wherein a planting density of the soybeans is 142500150000 plants/hm.sup.2.

5. The method for planting according to claim 1, wherein the intercropping includes with every two rows of maize as a maize belt intercropping a soybean belt between every two adjacent maize belts, wherein each soybean belt includes three soybean rows.

6. The method for planting according to claim 5, wherein the total width of one of the maize belts and the soybean belt is 210 cm.

7. The method for planting according to claim 5, wherein a row spacing of maize in each maize belt is 40 cm, a row spacing of soybeans in each soybean belt is 30 cm, and a distance between adjacent maize belts and soybean belts is 55 cm.

8. The method for planting according to claim 5, wherein a maize pit distance in each row of maize is 25 cm; and a soybean pit distance in each row of soybeans is 19 cm.

9-16. (canceled)

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of maize/soybean belt (silage) planting mode of an embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0018] The present application provides a method for planting high-yield forage in high altitude area, comprising the steps of:

[0019] Intercropping maize and soybeans at an altitude of more than 3000 m, and the varieties of maize include Demeiya No. 1 (It was introduced by KWS from Germany, the original code was KX7349; it was approved and promoted by Heilongjiang Variety Approval Committee in 2004) and Demeiya No. 3 (It was selected and bred by Beidahuang Kenfeng Seed Industry Co., Ltd., approved number: Heisen Jade 2013022), the varieties of soybeans include Zhongdou No. 39 (Provided by Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) and Huachun No. 6 (Provided by South China Agricultural University). The selection of maize and soybean varieties in this application can achieve the successful cultivation of maize and soybeans in high-altitude areas and achieve high yields of maize and soybeans.

[0020] In the present application, the maize and soybeans are preferably sown at the same time, and the sowing time is preferably from the last ten days of April to the middle ten days of May every year. In the present application, the harvest time is preferably from the last ten days of September to the early ten days of October in the current year. Sowing too early, it is susceptible to freezing damage due to the low temperature; harvesting too late, it is seriously affected by frost, and thus affecting the quality.

[0021] In the present application, the planting density of the maize is preferably 7200˜75000 plants/hm.sup.2. In the present application, the planting density of the soybeans is preferably 14250˜150000 plants/hm.sup.2.

[0022] In the present application, and as shown in FIG. 1, the intercropping 10 preferably includes that with every 2 rows of maize 12a, 12b, 14a, 14b as a maize belt 16a, 16b intercrops a belt 20 of soybeans between every two belts 16a, 16b of maize, and the number of soybean rows 22a, 22b, 22c per soybean belt 20 is 3. In the present application, the total width “W” of the maize belt 16a, 20 and the soybean belt is preferably 210 cm. In the present application, the row spacing R.sub.1 of maize in each belt is preferably 40 cm, the row spacing R.sub.2 of soybeans in each belt is preferably 30 cm, and the distance “B” between adjacent maize belts 16a, 16b and soybean belts 20 is preferably 55 cm. In the present application, the maize pit distance D.sub.1 in each row of maize is preferably 25 cm; the soybean pit distance D.sub.2 in each row of soybeans is preferably 19 cm. In the present application, two plants are preferably planted per pit of maize or soybeans.

[0023] The present application also provides a feed processing method based on the planting method described in the above technical schemes, which comprises the steps of: harvesting maize and soybeans at the same time to carry out mixed silage. In the present application, the harvest time is preferably from the middle ten days of September to early ten days of October, and the present application is more preferably when the maize is in the milk ripe period (in the present application, only two varieties, Demaiya No. 1 or Demaiya No. 3, can enter the milk ripe period when they are harvested, and the rest of the varieties can not; in addition, due to the low temperature, delayed harvesting cannot lead to further maturation either, on the contrary, freezing damage will cause greater losses), simultaneous harvest of maize and soybeans. It is not conducive to the modulation of silage because of the low temperature in high altitude area, such as in Tibetan Plateau, so that hay is generally modulated. The processing of the feed obtained by the planting method of the present application can realize mixed silage of maize and soybeans, which not only improves protein content, but also improves fermentation quality; in addition, in the comparative experiment of feeding yak, the daily gain based on mixed feed can be increased by 91.74% compared with the local hay.

[0024] The method for planting high-yield forage in high altitude area according to the present application will be described in further detail with reference to specific embodiments. The technical solutions of the present application include but are not limited to the following embodiments.

Example 1

[0025] The experimental site was Bamei Town, Kangding City, Ganzi Prefecture (altitude of 3450 m). Nine early maturing maize varieties (G504, G505, G415 (Provided by Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences), KY17 (Provided by Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, variety code: Ke 956 Extension name KY 17), KY19 (Provided by Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, original code: 334, Variety name: KY 19), KF192, Heihe No. 45 (Provided by Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, verification/registration number: Hei Shendou 2007013), Demeiya No. 1, Demeiya No. 3), and 27 early maturing soybean varieties (Huachun No. 2, Huachun No. 6, Huachun No. 8, Huachun No. 14, Huachun No. 15 (All the Huachun soybean varieties were provided by South China Agricultural University), Zhongdou No. 30, Zhongdou No. 39, Zhongdou No. 46 (All the Zhongdou varieties were provided by Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Nandou No. 35 (Provided by Nanchong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sichuan Province), Nanchundou No. 31 (Provided by Nanchong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sichuan Province), Tianlong No. 2 (Provided by Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Nanchundou No. 37 (Provided by Nanchong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sichuan Province), Jiyu No. 251, Jiyu No. 257, Jiyu No. 260, Jiyu No. 259, Jiyu No. 299 (All the Jiyu varieties were provided by Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Qiandou No. 2 (Selected and bred by Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Qiandou No. 3 (Selected and bred by Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Fudou No. 7 (Provided by Maoxian Science, Technology, Agriculture and Livestock Bureau, Aba Prefecture, Sichuan Province), Jidou No. 12, Jidou No. 18, Ji of No. 37 (All the Jidou varieties were bred by Hebei Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Guixia No. 2 (Provided by South China Agricultural University), Yunhuang No. 12 (Provided by Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Yunhuang No. 15 (Provided by Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Tianlong No. 1 (Provided by Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)) were used as the research materials. The planting density of maize was 75000 plants/hm.sup.2, and the planting density of soybeans was 150000 plants/hm.sup.2. The different maize varieties were arranged according to the field layout that maize and soybeans row ratio was 2:3 and the width of belt was 2.1 m (see FIG. 1 for details, maize row spacing was 40 cm, distance between soybeans and maize was 55 cm, soybean row spacing was 30 cm, and maize pit distance was 25 cm, the soybean pit distance was 19 cm, both of which were two plants per pit), one belt one variety, and the soybean varieties were planted in the intervals of maize belts. The fertilization of maize rows was carried out according to local production habits, and the nitrogen fertilization was not applied to soybean rows. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were consistent with local production levels. The experimental sowing was performed on May 15, 2018 and harvested on October 3.

[0026] At harvest, only Demeiya No. 1 and No. 3 maize would grow to the milk ripe stage, and the remaining varieties did not enter the grain filling stage; only soybean varieties of Huachun No. 6 and Zhongdou No. 39 were in the seed filling stage, and the remaining varieties had just podded or not; it can be seen from Table 1, that the highest yield of maize is Demeiya No. 1, followed by Demeiya No. 3; the highest yield of soybean was Huachun No. 6, followed by Zhongdou No. 39. It could be seen that the varieties screened by the present application could reach the appropriate harvesting period for the modulation of silage in the area with an altitude of 3500 m (maize was at milk ripe period and soybean was at seed filling stage), which could provide higher energy and protein required by yaks.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of yield between different varieties of maize and soybean (t/hm.sup.2) maize Biological Soybean Biological Soybean Biological Soybean Biological varieties yield varieties yield varieties yield varieties yield G505 21.465 Huachun 0.990 Zhongdou 4.020 Jiyu 5.670 No. 14 No. 46 No. 259 G504 22.800 Zhongdou 1.215 Jidou 4.290 Jidou 6.000 No. 30 No. 12 No. 18 KY17 33.210 Nanchundou 2.745 Guixia 4.425 Ji nf 6.420 No. 31 No. 2 No. 37 G415 34.680 Tianlong 2.925 Huachun 4.770 Jiyu 7.215 No. 2 No. 15 No. 251 KF192 39.780 Nanchundou 3.105 Huachun 4.845 Nandou 7.440 No. 37 No. 8 No. 35 KY19 42.555 Jiyu 3.150 Yunhuang 4.845 Tianlong 7.530 No. 260 No. 12 No. 1 Heihe 48.12 Qiandou 3.300 Jiyu 5.130 Yunhuang 8.070 No. 45 No. 2 No. 299 No. 15 Demeiya 50.535 Qiandou 3.660 Jiyu 5.235 Zhongdou 9.690 No. 3 No. 3 No. 257 No. 39 Demeiya 56.400 Fudou 3.780 Huachun 5.400 Huachun 10.560 No. 1 No. 7 No. 2 No. 6

Example 2

[0027] The experimental site was Bamei Town, Kangding City, Ganzi Prefecture (altitude of 3450 m). Maize varieties were Demeiya No. 1 and No. 3; soybean varieties were Huachun No. 6 and Zhongdou No. 39. The planting density of maize was 7200˜75000 plants/hm.sup.2, and the planting density of soybeans was 14250˜150000 plants/hm.sup.2. The maize and soybeans were sown on Apr. 30, 2019 at a row ratio of 2:3 and a width of belt of 2.1 m. When the maize were in the milk ripe period, the maize and soybeans were harvested at the same time using a field integrated harvesting and shredder, and the silage was baled after the production was measured, and the nutritional quality of the silage was measured after 60 days of silage; at the same time, some maize and soybeans were harvested separately for baled silage, as comparison. The fertilization of maize rows was carried out according to local production habits, and the nitrogen fertilization was not applied to soybean rows. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were consistent with local production levels.

[0028] It can be seen from Table 2, that the intercropping biological yield of Demeiya No. 1 and No. 3 of maize and Huachun No. 6 or Zhongdou No. 39 of soybean at a 2:3 row ratio is 58.35-67.8 t/hm.sup.2, which is far higher than that of conventional oat cultivation in Tibetan Plateau (Wang Huihui, Screening and Nutritional Value Evaluation of Oat Varieties in the Alpine Pastures of the Tibetan Plateau, Gansu Agricultural University Master Degree Thesis, p. 30, based on the dry matter content of 30%, the yield range of oats among different varieties is 27.3˜43.2 t/hm.sup.2, and the altitude is 2494 m, with the increase of altitude, the yield will also decrease) and highland barley (Li Yuemei, the effect of fertilization on the output and economic benefits of highland barley in Menyuan District of Qinghai, Jiangsu Agricultural Science, the suitable altitude for highland barley planting is 2600˜3300 m, based on the dry matter content of 30%, the large-area output is 15.0˜19.95 t/hm.sup.2). The application realizes the cultivation of high-stalk crop maize in an area of an altitude close to 3500 m, and makes full use of the characteristics of sufficient light in the high altitude area to achieve a reasonable field configuration of maize and soybeans, and obtains a biological yield far higher than that of traditional barley and oats.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Intercropping biological yield of maize and soybean maize plants/hm.sup.2 soybean plants/hm.sup.2 measured measured biological varieties re- theoretical actual theoretical actual production biological yield maize soybean peated density density density density area yield (kg) (t/hm.sup.2) Demaiya Huachun 1 75000 73500 150000 146700 8.4 m.sup.2 56.95 67.80 No. 1 No. 6 2 72750 148800 54.81 65.25 3 73950 147450 56.45 67.20 Demaiya Zhongdou 1 73350 143700 54.05 64.35 No. 1 No. 39 2 73020 144750 54.30 64.65 3 73800 145200 54.56 64.95 Demaiya Huachun 1 72000 146850 52.67 62.70 No. 3 No. 6 2 72750 147300 52.92 63.00 3 73500 149400 53.55 63.75 Demaiya Zhongdou 1 72300 142950 49.01 58.35 No. 3 No. 39 2 73500 145200 50.02 59.55 3 72900 145500 50.27 59.85

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Characteristics of maize and soybean mixed silage as mixed raw materials neutral detergent acid detergent Water soluble dry matter crude protein fiber NDF(% fiber ADF(% carbohydrate treatment DM(%) CP(% DM) DM) DM) WSC(% DM) Demaiya No.1 34.38 7.21 36.94 21.03 19.97 C1 Demaiya No.3 33.29 7.18 36.39 20.56 19.39 C2 Huachun No. 6 28.73 15.52 47.41 29.67 4.59 S1 Zhongdou 27.98 15.17 47.94 31.39 4.83 No. 39 S2

[0029] It can be seen from Table 3 that the crude protein (CP) content, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of soybean are significantly higher than that of maize, while the water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content is significantly lower than that of maize, and the sugar content is lower than the minimum sugar content of 5% required for silage.

[0030] Fermentation quality: The fermentation quality of the silage directly reflects the success of the silage, which is more important than the nutrients. For conventional silage, there are three very important indexes for judging the success of silage, namely pH is less than 4.2, ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen is less than 10%, and butyric acid content is less than 1%. It can be seen from Table 4 that the pH and butyric acid content of the silage soybean alone are not within the safe range, so the silage of soybean alone fails.

[0031] In the mixed silage of maize and soybeans, the pH, ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen, lactic acid and butyric acid content had reached the standard of safe silage fermentation, and could be stored safely.

[0032] The pH value is usually regarded as an important index to evaluate the quality of the silage. It is generally believed that the requirement of successful silage can be achieved when the pH value is reduced to 4.2, and the pH value of soybeans after silage in this experiment is as high as 5.38, which is far from the acidic environment required for safe storage and utilization of silage. Ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen is widely used to evaluate the quality of silage, which reflects the degree of protein decomposition during the silage process. The larger the value is, the more protein is decomposed, the worse the quality of the silage is. In this experiment, although the ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen value after soybean silage was lower than 10%, it was much higher than that of silage of maize alone and the mixed silage of maize and soybeans, indicating that silage of soybean alone had more protein degradation. A successful silage should have higher lactic acid and lower butyric acid. Butyric acid is a kind of malodorous gas produced by the decomposition of glucose and lactic acid by Clostridium butyricum, which makes the raw materials odorous, thereby reducing the quality of silage. In this experiment, except for the silage of soybeans alone, the presence of butyric acid was not detected, and all of them had high lactic acid content, indicating that they have good fermentation quality and similar sensory quality conclusions.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Fermentation quality under different storage treatments of maize and soybean pro- lactic acetic pionic butyric Ammonia acid acid acid acid nitrogen/ (mg .Math. (mg .Math. (mg .Math. (mg .Math. treat- total g.sup.−1 g.sup.−1 g.sup.−1 g.sup.−1 sense ment pH nitrogen DM) DM) DM) DM) scores grade C1S1 4.11 3.79 6.03 1.13 0.83 — 18.34 1 C1S2 4.08 3.46 6.02 1.27 0.84 — 18.65 1 C2S1 4.16 3.82 6.01 1.29 0.85 — 18.33 1 C2S2 4.09 3.78 6.11 1.68 0.89 — 18.56 1 C1 4.18 3.91 6.98 1.37 1.12 — 18.45 1 C2 4.12 3.81 7.02 1.35 1.06 — 18.67 1 S1 5.38 7.19 1.41 4.95 2.08 1.59 3.28 4 S2 5.15 7.21 1.43 4.93 2.02 1.43 2.98 4

[0033] Nutrient composition: it can be seen from Table 5, the content of CP, NDF and ADF in the silage of soybean alone are significantly higher than other treatments (P<0.05), and the content of WSC is significantly lower than other treatments (P<0.05). Maize has the highest WSC content and the lowest CP content in the silage alone, which is significantly different from other treatments (P<0.05). The CP content of mixed silage in each row is significantly higher than that of silage of maize alone (P<0.05).

[0034] The nutritional value of silage is a key problem that people pay attention to. The CP content is an important indicator to measure the nutritional value of forage. The whole plant of maize is easy to make silage, but the CP content is low, and the soybean CP content is high, but its WSC content is low, and the fermentation substrate is insufficient, which is not conducive to the success of the silage. However, the silage quality can be improved by the mixed silage of the two. In this experiment, after 60 days to obtain the silage of soybean alone, the WSC content was the lowest, while NDF and ADF were significantly the highest in all treatments. However, there is a negative correlation between NDF value and livestock absorption rate. The lower the NDF value is, the higher its economic value is. ADF is the indigestible part of cellulose, and its content is inversely related to the forage digestibility. These all indicate that soybean is not suitable for silage alone.

[0035] Compared with the silage of soybean alone, in the present application, maize has higher WSC content, which promotes the production of lactic acid and the rapid reduction of pH value, so that the fermentation reached an ideal state, and finally the silage was successful. However, the CP content of each treatment of the mixed silage of maize and soybeans was significantly higher than that of silage of maize alone, and the content of NDF and ADF was not significantly different from that of the silage of maize alone. This shows that although maize is easy to make silage, the addition of soybean is helpful to increase the crude protein content of the feed and further improve its quality.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Nutritional composition of treatments under different mixed silage of maize and soybeans neutral acid dry crude detergent detergent Water soluble treat- matter protein fiber fiber ADF(% carbohydrate ment DM(%) CP(% DM) NDF(% DM) DM) WSC(% DM) C1S1 33.29 10.35 36.05 21.21 4.35 C1S2 33.16 10.19 36.09 21.15 4.32 C2S1 32.18 10.28 35.97 21.32 4.40 C2S2 32.09  9.98 35.82 21.26 4.47 C1 33.88  6.21 35.98 21.09 4.51 C2 32.69  6.09 35.87 20.76 4.29 S1 23.63 13.68 45.21 28.99 1.21 S2 22.07 13.09 45.35 30.09 1.23

Example 3

[0036] The experimental site was Zake Township, Ganzi County (altitude of 3480 m). Maize varieties were Demeiya No. 1 and No. 3; soybean varieties were Huachun No. 6 and Zhongdou No. 39. The planting density of maize was 7200˜75000 plants/hm.sup.2, and the planting density of soybeans was 14250˜150000 plants/hm.sup.2. The maize and soybeans were sown on Apr. 28, 2019 at a row ratio of 2:3 and a width of belt of 2.1 m. When the maize were in the milk ripe period, the maize and soybeans were harvested at the same time using a field integrated harvesting and shredder, and the silage was baled after the production was measured, and the nutritional quality of the silage was measured after 60 days of silage; at the same time, some maize and soybeans were harvested separately for baled silage, as comparison. The fertilization of maize rows was carried out according to local production habits, and the nitrogen fertilization was not applied to soybean rows. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were consistent with local production levels.

[0037] It can be seen from Table 6, that the intercropping biological yield of Demeiya No. 1 and No. 3 of maize and Huachun No. 6 or Zhongdou No. 39 of soybean at a 2:3 row ratio is 59.25-67.65 t/hm.sup.2, which is far higher than that of conventional oat cultivation in Tibetan Plateau and highland barley. It can be seen that the varieties selected by the present application can not only realize the cultivation of high-stalk crop maize and high-protein crop soybean in an area of an altitude close to 3500 m, and make full use of the characteristics of sufficient light in the high altitude area to achieve a reasonable field configuration of maize and soybean, and obtained a biological yield far higher than that of traditional barley and oats.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Intercropping biological yield of maize and soybeans soybean maize plants/hm.sup.2 plants/hm.sup.2 measured measured biological varieties re- theoretical actual theoretical actual production biological yield maize soybean peated density density density density area yield (kg) (t/hm.sup.2) Demeiya Huachun 1 75000 73800 150000 149700 8.4 m.sup.2 56.85 67.65 No. 1 No. 6 2 72600 149100 54.71 65.10 3 74100 147900 56.55 67.35 Demeiya Zhongdou 1 73200 144000 54.15 64.50 No. 1 No. 39 2 73050 144750 54.25 64.65 3 73800 144900 54.62 65.10 Demeiya Huachun 1 72150 148350 52.88 63.00 No. 3 No. 6 2 72900 147300 52.96 63.00 3 73350 149550 53.85 64.05 Demeiya Zhongdou 1 72600 144450 49.81 59.25 No. 3 No. 39 2 73800 144900 50.22 59.85 3 73200 145650 50.47 60.15

[0038] It can be seen from Table 7 that the crude protein (CP) content, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of soybean are significantly higher than that of maize, while the water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content is significantly lower than that of maize, and the sugar content is lower than the minimum sugar content of 5% required for silage.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Characteristics of mixed raw materials of maize and soybean mixed silage neutral detergent acid detergent Water soluble dry matter crude protein fiber NDF(% fiber ADF(% carbohydrate treatment DM(%) CP(% DM) DM) DM) WSC(% DM) Demeiya No. 1 34.18  7.23 36.96 21.05 19.98 C1 Demeiya No. 3 33.49  7.19 36.42 20.57 19.40 C2 Huachun No. 6 28.77 15.51 47.39 29.65  4.49 S1 Zhongdou No. 27.94 15.27 47.84 31.41  4.63 39 S2

[0039] Fermentation quality: it can be seen from table 8 that the pH (5.18 and 5.39) and butyric acid content (1.53 mg.Math.g.sup.−1DM and 1.61 mg.Math.g.sup.−1 DM) of silage of soybeans alone are not within the safe range in this experiment, resulting the fermentation quality lies only in the forth grade and fails to make silage. In the treatments for mixed silage of maize and soybean, the contents of pH, ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen, lactic acid and butyric acid reached the standard of safe silage fermentation. The presence of butyric acid is not detected in all mixed silage treatments and all have high content of lactic acid, which indicated that they could be stored safely and have good fermentation quality; the sensory quality of each mixed silage treatment shows the similar conclusion that the fermentation quality reaches the first grade, and the silage is good.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Fermentation quality under different storage treatments of maize and soybean pro- lactic acetic pionic butyric Ammonia acid acid acid acid nitrogen/ (mg .Math. (mg .Math. (mg .Math. (mg .Math. treat- total g.sup.−1 g.sup.−1 g.sup.−1 g.sup.−1 sense ment pH nitrogen DM) DM) DM) DM) scores grade C1S1 4.06 3.69 6.13 1.14 0.82 — 18.24 1 C1S2 4.07 3.47 6.12 1.26 0.83 — 18.45 1 C2S1 4.06 3.78 6.11 1.28 0.84 — 18.36 1 C2S2 4.09 3.76 6.18 1.68 0.86 — 18.58 1 C1 4.11 3.81 6.78 1.36 1.08 — 18.48 1 C2 4.09 3.71 6.82 1.34 1.09 — 18.77 1 S1 5.39 7.29 1.42 4.94 2.06 1.61 3.18 4 S2 5.18 7.28 1.41 4.95 2.01 1.53 2.99 4

[0040] Nutrient composition: it can be seen from Table 9, the content of CP, NDF and ADF in soybean silage alone are significantly higher than other treatments (P<0.05), and the content of WSC is significantly lower than other treatments (P<0.05). Maize has the highest WSC content and the lowest CP content in the silage alone, which is significantly different from other treatments (P<0.05). The CP content of mixed silage at each row ratio is significantly higher than that in silage of maize alone (P<0.05), however, the content of NDF and ADF is not significantly different from that of silage of maize alone (P<0.05).

[0041] Similar to the conclusion of Example 2, this example also shows once again that mixed silage can combine the characteristics of high CP content of soybean and high WSC content of maize, make up for the deficiencies of silage of each alone, so as to maximize the improvement of the nutritional quality of silage, and achieve the effect where 1+1 is greater than 2.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Nutritional composition of treatments under different mixed silage of maize and soybeans neutral acid dry crude detergent detergent Water soluble treat- matter protein fiber fiber ADF(% carbohydrate ment DM(%) CP(% DM) NDF(% DM) DM) WSC(% DM) C1S1 33.19 10.36 36.04 21.20 4.34 C1S2 33.17 10.21 36.08 21.16 4.33 C2S1 32.19 10.29 35.96 21.33 4.39 C2S2 32.13  9.99 35.81 21.27 4.46 C1 33.87  6.23 35.96 21.11 4.50 C2 32.66  6.13 35.86 20.78 4.28 S1 23.62 13.69 45.19 28.98 1.22 S2 22.06 13.14 45.25 30.08 1.24

Example 4

[0042] This experiment was conducted at Guogan Farm in Kangding County, Ganzi Prefecture, Sichuan Province from Oct. 1, 2018 to Dec. 29, 2018, for a total of 90 days.

[0043] Forty yaks with similar weight from growth and development and good health were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups with 20 Yaks in each group. The control group (CK) was fed with traditionally provided feed, and the experimental group with an equivalent amount of silage to replace the hay in the traditional feeding composition, as shown in Table 10. It can be seen from Table 11 that in the comparative experiment of feeding yak, the average daily weight gain based on mixed feed compared to local hay can be increased by 91.74%. This indicates that mixed silage of maize and soybeans can increase the average daily gain of yak, facilitate the rapid growth thereof, and improve feed conversion rate.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Diet composition of yak in winter (g/head/D) The control Maize Diet species group silage oat hay 15000 Maize and 15000 soybean silage corn meal 2100 500 soybean meal 350 350 soda 35 35 wheat bran 175 175 salt 35 35

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Changes in body weight of experimental yak Average Average Average Average starting final weight daily weight weight gain gain (kg) (kg) (kg) (g/d) starting date ending date yak traditional 50  98 48  533 September 1 December 1 feeding maize and 50 142 92 1022 September 1 December 1 soybean mixed silage

[0044] The above described are only preferred embodiments of the present application, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that, without departing from the principle of the present application, several improvements and retouches can be made, and these improvements and retouches also should be regarded as the protection scope of the present application fall into the scope of the present application.