HIGH PRESSURE RATIO GAS TURBINE ENGINE
20210348555 · 2021-11-11
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F02C7/36
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2260/4031
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02C9/18
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02C3/107
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02K3/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2240/60
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2260/40311
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T50/60
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F05D2220/323
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2220/3216
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2250/80
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A gas turbine engine (10) comprising: a high pressure turbine (17); a low pressure turbine (19); a high pressure compressor (15) coupled to the high pressure turbine (17) by a high pressure shaft (27); a propulsor (23) and a low pressure compressor (14) coupled to the low pressure turbine (19) via a low pressure shaft (26) and a reduction gearbox (30); wherein the low pressure compressor (14) consists of four or five compressor stages (14); the high pressure compressor (15) consists of eight or nine compressor stages; the low pressure turbine (19) comprises four or more stages; and the high pressure compressor (15) and low pressure compressor (14) together define a core overall pressure ratio of greater than 36:1.
Claims
1. A gas turbine engine comprising: a high pressure turbine; a low pressure turbine; a high pressure compressor coupled to the high pressure turbine by a high pressure shaft; a propulsor and a low pressure compressor coupled to the low pressure turbine via a low pressure shaft and a reduction gearbox; wherein the low pressure compressor consists of four or five compressor stages; the high pressure compressor consists of eight or nine compressor stages; the low pressure turbine comprises four or more stages; and the high pressure compressor and low pressure compressor together define a core overall pressure ratio of greater than 36:1.
2. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the core overall pressure ratio is between 36:1 and 60:1.
3. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the low pressure compressor defines a cruise average stage pressure ratio of between 1.24:1 and 1.35:1.
4. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the low pressure compressor defines a cruise pressure ratio of between 2.3 and 4.5.
5. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the high pressure compressor defines a cruise pressure ratio of between 8:1 and 18:1.
6. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the high pressure compressor defines a cruise average pressure ratio of between 1.3 and 1.42.
7. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the high pressure turbine consists of two or fewer stages.
8. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the low pressure turbine consists of four stages.
9. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the reduction gearbox comprises a star gearbox.
10. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the reduction gearbox defines a reduction ratio of approximately 3.
11. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the low pressure compressor is positioned axially upstream of the high pressure compressor.
12. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the propulsor is in the form of an open rotor, or a ducted fan.
13. A gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein each compressor and/or turbine stage comprises a row of rotor blades and a row of stator vanes, which may be variable stator vanes.
14. A method of operating the gas turbine engine of claim 1, comprising, at cruise conditions, operating the low and high pressure compressors to provide a pressure ratio of greater than 36:1.
Description
[0050] Embodiments will now be described by way of example only, with reference to the Figures, in which:
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059] The fan 23 is attached to and driven by the low pressure turbine 19 via a shaft 26 and an epicyclic gearbox 30.
[0060] The engine core 11 is surrounded by a core casing 37, which contains the compressor 14, 15, combustor 16 and turbines 17, 19. The core casing 37 comprises one or more handling bleeds comprising one or more valves 38 configured to communicate between the core compressor flow path A (e.g. at the downstream end of the high pressure compressor 15) and the fan flowpath B. The core casing 37 comprises a carbon composite material such as carbon fibre reinforce plastic (CFRP).
[0061] Similarly, the engine nacelle 21 comprises a carbon composite material, such as CFRP. For example, a Thrust Reverser Unit (TRU) 39 provided at a rear of the nacelle 21 may comprise carbon composite material.
[0062] In use, the core airflow A is accelerated and compressed by the low pressure compressor 14 and directed into the high pressure compressor 15 where further compression takes place. The compressed air exhausted from the high pressure compressor 15 is directed into the combustion equipment 16 where it is mixed with fuel and the mixture is combusted. The resultant hot combustion products then expand through, and thereby drive, the high pressure and low pressure turbines 17, 19 before being exhausted through the nozzle 20 to provide some propulsive thrust. The high pressure turbine 17 drives the high pressure compressor 15 by a suitable interconnecting shaft 27. The fan 23 generally provides the majority of the propulsive thrust. The epicyclic gearbox 30 is a reduction gearbox.
[0063] An exemplary arrangement for a geared fan gas turbine engine 10 is shown in
[0064] Note that the terms “low pressure turbine” and “low pressure compressor” as used herein may be taken to mean the lowest pressure turbine stages and lowest pressure compressor stages (i.e. not including the fan 23) respectively and/or the turbine and compressor stages that are connected together by the interconnecting shaft 26 with the lowest rotational speed in the engine (i.e. not including the gearbox output shaft that drives the fan 23). In some literature, the “low pressure turbine” and “low pressure compressor” referred to herein may alternatively be known as the “intermediate pressure turbine” and “intermediate pressure compressor”. Where such alternative nomenclature is used, the fan 23 may be referred to as a first, or lowest pressure, compression stage.
[0065] The epicyclic gearbox 30 is shown by way of example in greater detail in
[0066] The epicyclic gearbox 30 illustrated by way of example in
[0067] It will be appreciated that the arrangement shown in
[0068] Accordingly, the present disclosure extends to a gas turbine engine having any arrangement of gearbox styles (for example star or planetary), support structures, input and output shaft arrangement, and bearing locations.
[0069] Other gas turbine engines to which the present disclosure may be applied may have alternative configurations. By way of further example, the gas turbine engine shown in
[0070] The geometry of the gas turbine engine 10, and components thereof, is defined by a conventional axis system, comprising an axial direction (which is aligned with the rotational axis 9), a radial direction (in the bottom-to-top direction in
[0071] Referring now to
[0072] The low pressure compressor consists of four or five stages (i.e. no more than five stages, and no fewer than four stages) 41a-d. Each stage 41a-d comprises at least one respective compressor rotor 43, and may comprise a respective stator 44. The respective rotor 43 and stator 44 are generally axially spaced. In the present case, the first stator 44 is downstream in core flow of the first rotor 43. One or more further stators such as an inlet stator (not shown) may be provided—however, since no additional rotor is associated with the inlet stator, this does not constitute an additional stage, since no pressure rise is provided by the inlet stator alone. As will be appreciated by the person skilled in the art, the rotors 43 are coupled to the respective shaft (i.e. the low pressure shaft 26 in the case of the low pressure compressor 14) by corresponding discs 46a-d, and so turn with the shaft 26. On the other hand, the stators 44 are held stationary. In some cases, the stators 44 may pivot about their long axes, to adjust the angle of attack and inlet and outlet area for the respective compressor stage. Such stators are known as “variable stator vanes” or VSVs.
[0073] The high pressure compressor 15 similarly consists of either eight or nine stages, and in the described embodiment consists of eight stages. Again, each stage comprises at least a rotor, and may also comprise a stator.
[0074] The turbine is shown in
[0075] Similarly, to drive the low pressure compressor 14 and fan 23, at least four low pressure turbine stages 49a-d are provided. In some cases, five low pressure turbine stages may be provided.
[0076] Between them, the high and low pressure compressors 15, 16 define a maximum in use overall core pressure ratio (OPR). The core OPR is defined as the ratio of the stagnation pressure upstream of the first stage 44 of the low pressure compressor 15 to the stagnation pressure at the exit of the highest pressure compressor 16 (before entry into the combustor). The core OPR excludes any pressure rise generated by the fan 23 where the fan provides air flow to the core, so a total engine overall pressure ratio (EPR) may be higher than the core OPR. In the present disclosure, the overall core OPR is at least 36:1, and may be between 36:1 and 56:1. In the described embodiment, the core OPR is 40, and may take any value between these upper and lower bounds. For example, the core OPR may be any of 36, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60, or even higher.
[0077] As will be understood, the core OPR will vary according to atmospheric, flight and engine conditions. However, the cruise OPR is as defined above.
[0078] As will be understood, a large design space must be considered when designing a gas turbine engine to determine an optimal engine with respect to a chosen metric (such as engine weight, cost, thermal efficiency, propulsive efficiency, or a balance of these). In many cases, there may be a large number of feasible solutions for a given set of conditions to achieve a desired metric.
[0079] One such variable is core OPR. As core OPR increases, thermal efficiency also tends to increase, and so a high OPR is desirable. Even once a particular OPR is chosen however, a number of design variables must be chosen to meet the chosen OPR.
[0080] One such design variable is the amount of pressure rise provided by the low pressure compressor 15 relative to that provided by the high pressure compressor 16 (sometimes referred to as “worksplit”). As will be understood, the total core OPR can be determined by multiplying the low pressure compressor pressure ratio (i.e. the ratio between the stagnation pressure at the outlet of the low pressure compressor to the stagnation pressure at the inlet of the low pressure compressor 15) by the high pressure compressor ratio (i.e. the ratio between the stagnation pressure at the outlet of the high pressure compressor 16 to the stagnation pressure at the inlet of the high pressure compressor 16). Consequently, a higher core OPR can be provided by increasing the high pressure compressor ratio, the low pressure compressor ratio, or both.
[0081] The inventors have found that a particularly efficient work split for a gas turbine engine having a core OPR in the above described range can be provided by providing a low pressure compressor 14 consisting of four or five stages, and having a pressure ratio of between 2.4:1 and 4.5:1, and a high pressure compressor is then provided having a pressure ratio above 8:1, such that the overall core pressure ratio is above 36:1. It has been found to be feasible to provide a pressure ratio of 18:1 on a high pressure compressor provided on a single shaft using current technology using a reasonable number of compressor stages, without requiring an excessive number of variable stages, and at a reasonable rotational speed to give high overall efficiency. Consequently, to provide the necessary core OPR, a low pressure compressor ratio of between 2.4:1 and 4.5:1 is required.
[0082] Similarly, there are several ways to increase the compressor pressure ratio. A first method is to increase the stage loading. Stage loading is defined as the stagnation pressure ratio across an individual stage (rotor and stator) of a compressor. Similarly, an average stage loading can be defined as the sum of the stage loadings of each compressor stage of a compressor, divided by the number of stages. For example, in the present disclosure, the average stage loading of the low pressure compressor 14 is between 1.24 and 1.35. This can in turn be managed by one or more of increasing the rotor speed at the maximum compression conditions, increasing the turning provided by the blades, or increasing the radius of the tips of the compressor rotors, which in turn necessitates an increase in the radius of the roots of the compressor rotors to maintain a given flow area. Each of these options has associated advantages and disadvantages. For instance, increasing low pressure compressor rotor speed necessitates either an increase in the reduction ratio of the gearbox 30, or a reduction in the fan 23 radius, in order to maintain fan tip speeds at a desired level for noise and efficiency reasons. On the other hand, increasing the compressor tip radius necessitates an increase in weight, in view of the larger compressor discs that are required. Increased turning of the airflow may result in lower surge margin, and reduced efficiency. In any case, a higher stage loading may result in a lower efficiency, since the increased rotor tip speed or higher turning leads to lower compressor efficiencies, in view of losses associated with aerodynamic shocks as the tips significantly exceed the speed of sound.
[0083] A second option is to increase the number of stages in the respective compressors, thereby maintaining a low stage loading, low rotational speed, and low disc weight. Again, this can be achieved by adding a stage to either the low pressure compressor 15 or high pressure compressor 16. However, this will generally result in a higher weight and cost associated with the additional stage.
[0084] A further complication is the presence of the gearbox 30. The gearbox provides additional design freedom, since, as noted above, the gearbox reduction ratio can be selected to provide a preferred fan tip speed independently of both fan radius and low pressure compressor rotor speed. However, the gearbox also presents constraints in view of its large size. Consequently, the large radius required radially inward of the fan 23 inherent in a geared turbofan having an epicyclic gearbox dictates a fan 23 having a large hub radius, i.e. a large radial distance between the engine centre 9 and the aerodynamic root of the fan blades 23. Furthermore, in view of the relatively slow turning fan typical of geared turbofans, relatively little pressure rise is provided by the inner radius of the fan 23, and so geared turbofans tend to have a high hub to tip ratio fan 23.
[0085] The inventors have explored this design space, and found an optimum range of stage numbers and compressor pressure ratios, that provides an optimal mix of weight and efficiency.
[0086] In the present disclosure, a relatively large pressure ratio is provided by the low pressure compressor 14, compared to prior geared turbofans. This is achieved using a four or five stage compressor 14, which rotates at relatively low speed. This low speed allows a relatively low ratio gearbox to be employed (typically of the order of 3:1), while maintaining a relatively low fan blade tip speed, with a high diameter fan. The permits a “star” gearbox, as described above, in conjunction with a high bypass ratio (typically greater than 10). Such an arrangement has several advantages over planetary gearboxes (in which the ring gear is held static, and the planet carrier is used to drive the fan), such as more convenient oil distribution.
[0087] In view of the relatively high pressure high work provided by the low pressure compressor 14, additional work is required from the low pressure turbine 19. In view of the relatively low shaft speed, the inventors have found that a fourth or even a fifth turbine stage is necessary, which is unusual on a geared turbofan. This is because the low rotational speed results in low turbine tip speeds, which results in relatively low work per revolution. Consequently, a four or five stage low pressure turbine is provided in this case.
[0088] The above optimum parameters define a design space for the compressor, as illustrated in
[0089] One corner of the design space is defined by the maximum low pressure compressor 14 cruise pressure ratio (4.5:1), and the minimum high pressure compressor 15 cruise pressure ratio (8:1) to achieve the minimum require overall core pressure ratio (36:1). Above this low pressure cruise pressure ratio (4.5:1), it has been found that compressor stability cannot be assured, without increasing either rotational speed or diameter (and so compressor blade tip speed in either case), or increasing low pressure compressor stage count above five stages. However, where compressor tip speed is increased, efficiency begins to fall, and so the advantages of higher loading are lost. The inventors have found that a low pressure cruise pressure ratio of 4.5:1 can be provided with no more than five stages. Indeed, the inventors have found that a cruise low pressure ratio of up to 3.3:1 can be provided with only four low pressure compressor stages. Similarly, overall engine efficiency suffers when the overall core engine pressure ratio falls below 36:1, particularly in view of the relatively small pressure rise generated by the fan in a geared turbofan.
[0090] A second corner of the design space is defined by the maximum low pressure compressor 14 cruise pressure ratio (4.5:1), and the maximum high pressure compressor 15 cruise pressure ratio (18:1) that can reasonably be sustained, without requiring excessive stage numbers, and increased weight. This combination gives an overall core pressure ratio of 80:1. Above this value, increases in thermal efficiency begin to be outweighed by increases in weight, and so the design goals of increased overall propulsion system efficiency are not achieved. In particular, the inventors have found that the above parameters can be provided using a high pressure compressor having eight or nine stages, with relatively low work per stage. This relatively low work per stage provides for high compressor efficiency, while the high overall pressure ratio results in high overall engine efficiency.
[0091] A third corner of the design space is defined by the maximum high pressure compressor 15 cruise pressure ratio (18:1) that can reasonably be sustained, and the minimum low pressure compressor cruise pressure ratio (2.4:1) that requires four compressor stages. Below this value, only three low pressure compressor stages are required, and so the engine weight is not optimised. This combination gives an overall core pressure ratio of 43:1, which provides good thermal efficiency, with a small number of overall compressor stages.
[0092] A fourth corner of the design space is defined by the minimum high pressure compressor cruise pressure ratio required to achieve the required overall core pressure ratio of 36:1 at the minimum low pressure compressor 14 stage loading for which four compressor stages are required (2.4:1). This gives a high pressure compressor cruise pressure ratio of approximately 15:1.
[0093] A fifth corner of the design space is defined. At this point, a higher low pressure compressor cruise pressure ratio of 3.0:1 is provided, and a lower high pressure compressor cruise pressure ratio of 12:1 is provided, while providing the minimum overall core compressor pressure ratio of 36:1.
[0094] In one example, such as that shown in
[0095] The designer is hence taught how to design a compressor which achieves the desired characteristics of high overall core cruise pressure ratio (greater than 36:1), while minimising stage count and maximising compressor efficiency.
[0096] Two example gas turbine engines that have been considered by the inventors are described below.
[0097] A first example engine has a maximum take-off thrust at sea level under ISO conditions of approximately 45,000 pounds-force (lbf). The low pressure compressor has four stages, and is configured to provide a cruise pressure ratio of approximately 2.8:1. The high pressure compressor is configured to provide a cruise pressure ratio of approximately 13:1. This gives an overall core pressure ratio of approximately 36:1. Such an engine is thought to provide an optimum mix of weight and thermal efficiency for an engine in this class, since weight is a more important factor in this class than for higher thrust engines, in view of the shorter typical mission ranges of aircraft for which engines of this thrust are designed.
[0098] A second example engine has a maximum take-off thrust at sea level under ISO conditions of approximately 84,000 pounds-force (lbf). The low pressure compressor has four stages, and is configured to provide a cruise pressure ratio of approximately 2.8:1. The high pressure compressor is configured to provide a cruise pressure ratio of approximately 17:1. This gives an overall core pressure ratio of approximately 48:1. Such an engine is thought to provide an optimum mix of weight and thermal efficiency for an engine in this class, since thermal efficiency is a more important factor in this class than for lower thrust engines, in view of the longer typical mission ranges of aircraft for which engines of this thrust are designed.
[0099] It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments above-described and various modifications and improvements can be made without departing from the concepts described herein. Except where mutually exclusive, any of the features may be employed separately or in combination with any other features and the disclosure extends to and includes all combinations and sub-combinations of one or more features described herein.