Kit and method for measuring prostaglandin E-major urinary metabolite

Abstract

Disclosed is a method of measuring the prostaglandin E main urinary metabolite (PGE-MUM), in which a mixture solution of a urine sample treated with alkali can directly be subjected to an antigen-antibody reaction system in an immunoassay of PGE-MUM, without neutralization and dilution followed by dispensation. The method of measuring PGE-MUM includes the steps of: a) mixing a urine sample with an alkaline aqueous solution, and b) subjecting the mixture solution resulting from a) to an immunoassay using a bicyclo PGE-MUM-immobilized or anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized solid phase to measure PGE-MUM in the urine sample, wherein the immunoassay is performed in a weakly-acidic basal buffer solution in the presence of a second pH buffering agent which exerts a buffering effect in the basic range and is different from the pH buffering agent contained in the basal buffer solution, and in the presence of a cationic surfactant.

Claims

1. A method of measuring prostaglandin E main urinary metabolite (PGE-MUM), said method comprising the steps of: a) mixing a urine sample with an alkaline aqueous solution to form a mixture solution, and b) subjecting the mixture solution resulting from a) to an immunoassay in order to measure PGE-MUM in the urine sample, wherein said immunoassay is performed in a basal buffer solution comprising a first pH buffering agent, a second pH buffering agent having a pKa of from 7.0 to 10.0, and a cationic surfactant; wherein the second pH buffering agent is different from the first pH buffering agent, and wherein the pH of the basal buffer solution is from 5.0 to 6.0; and wherein said immunoassay comprises using a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody and particles on which either bicyclo PGE-MUM or an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody is immobilized, wherein said particles are suspended in said basal buffer solution.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said cationic surfactant is an alkyltrimethylammonium halide.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the alkyl group in said alkyltrimethylammonium halide has 12 to 20 carbon atoms.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said particles suspended in said basal buffer solution are mixed with the mixture solution resulting from a).

5. The method of claim 4, wherein said particles are magnetic particles.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein said basal buffer solution further comprises a zwitterionic surfactant.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the molar concentration of the zwitterionic surfactant is 10 to 90% of the molar concentration of the cationic surfactant.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said bicyclo PGE-MUM is immobilized on said particles, and said step b) comprises reacting the mixture solution resulting from a) with said particles suspended in said basal buffer solution to form a reaction solution, and then reacting the resulting reaction solution with a labeling solution containing the labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody, washing said particles, and then quantifying labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody immobilized on said particles.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the method does not comprise an additional step of neutralizing or diluting the mixture solution resulting from a).

10. A kit for the measurement of urinary PGE-MUM, comprising: a basal buffer solution comprising a first pH buffering agent, a second pH buffering agent having a pKa of from 7.0 to 10.0, and a cationic surfactant; wherein the second pH buffering agent is different from the first pH buffering agent, and wherein the pH of the basal buffer solution is from 5.0 to 6.0; particles on which bicyclo PGE-MUM or an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody is immobilized, wherein said particles are suspended in said basal buffer solution; and a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody.

11. The kit of claim 10, wherein said particles are magnetic particles.

12. The kit of claim 10, wherein said basal buffer solution further comprises a zwitterionic surfactant.

13. The kit of claim 10, wherein said cationic surfactant is an alkyltrimethylammonium halide.

14. The kit of claim 13, wherein the alkyl group in said alkyltrimethylammonium halide has 12 to 20 carbon atoms.

15. The kit of claim 12, wherein the molar concentration of the zwitterionic surfactant is 10 to 90% of the molar concentration of the cationic surfactant.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram showing an antigen-antibody reaction system according to the first embodiment of the method according to the present invention.

(2) FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram showing an antigen-antibody reaction system according to the second embodiment of the method according to the present invention.

(3) FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram showing an antigen-antibody reaction system according to the third embodiment of the method according to the present invention.

(4) FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram showing an antigen-antibody reaction system according to the fourth embodiment of the method according to the present invention.

(5) FIG. 5 shows a schematic diagram showing an antigen-antibody reaction system according to the fifth embodiment of the method according to the present invention.

(6) FIGS. 6A to 6C show the correlation between the measured PGE-MUM values obtained by a conventional method (RIA) and those obtained by each CLEIA method. FIG. 6A shows the correlation between the measured PGE-MUM values obtained by the conventional RIA (Reference Example 1) and those obtained by a CLEIA method with neutralization and dilution steps (Comparative Example 1). FIG. 6B shows the correlation between the measured PGE-MUM values obtained by the RIA and those obtained by a CLEIA method without neutralization and dilution steps (Comparative Example 2). FIG. 6C shows the correlation between the measured PGE-MUM values obtained by the RIA and those obtained in Example 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(7) As described above, the method of measuring PGE-MUM in urine according to the present invention comprises the steps of: a) mixing a urine sample with an alkaline aqueous solution, and b) subjecting the mixture solution resulting from a) to an immunoassay using a bicyclo PGE-MUM-immobilized or anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized solid phase to measure PGE-MUM in the urine sample.

(8) The above-described alkaline treatment step a) per se is known, as described in Patent Document 1. The alkaline treatment is carried out by mixing a urine sample with an alkaline aqueous solution. A sodium hydroxide solution, a potassium hydroxide solution, calcium hydroxide, or barium hydroxide can be used as the alkaline solution used in this step, but the alkaline solution is not limited thereto as long as it is a strong alkaline aqueous solution. The normality of the alkaline aqueous solution can be 0.05 to 5 normal (N), preferably 0.1 to 4 N, and more preferably 0.2 to 2 N. The mixing ratio of a urine sample to a strong alkaline solution in the alkaline treatment can be 1:0.1 to 1:10, preferably 1:0.5 to 1:5, and more preferably 1:1 to 1:4.

(9) The alkaline treatment can be performed by mixing a urine sample with a strong alkaline solution and leaving the resulting mixture to stand at 5 to 40° C., preferably 25 to 40° C., for 3 to 60 minutes, preferably 5 to 10 minutes.

(10) In the subsequent step b), the mixture solution resulting from a) is subjected to an immunoassay using a bicyclo PGE-MUM-immobilized or anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized solid phase to measure PGE-MUM in the urine sample. The immunoassay using a bicyclo PGE-MUM-immobilized or anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized solid phase per se is known and will be described in the explanation of the various embodiments described below. Well known and usually used solid phases for immunoassays, such as particles (beads) and microplate wells, can be used as the solid phase. In cases where particles are used, magnetic particles (also referred to as magnetic beads) are preferable for easy recovery. Magnetic particles per se are well known in the field of immunoassay and are commercially available, so that commercial magnetic particles can preferably be used. For example, commercially available products such as commercial carboxylated magnetic particles and magnetic gelatin particles can preferably be used. The average diameter of magnetic particles is not particularly limited, but it is usually from about 1 μm to 10 μm.

(11) An important feature of the method according to the present invention is to perform the immunoassay in a weakly-acidic basal buffer solution in the presence of a second pH buffering agent which exerts a buffering effect in the basic range and is different from the pH buffering agent contained in the basal buffer solution, and in the presence of a cationic surfactant.

(12) The basal buffer solution is weakly acidic, and a buffer solution with a pH of 4.5 to 6.5 is preferably used, and a buffer solution with a pH of 5.0 to 6.0 is further preferably used. A buffer solution which has a buffer capacity at the pH range of about 4.0 to 7.5, such as a phosphate buffer, an acetate buffer, citric acid, maleic acid, malic acid and succinic acid, can preferably be used as the basal buffer solution. The use of an acidic buffer solution as the basal buffer solution enables to neutralize, at least partially, the strong alkaline treated sample obtained in the step a).

(13) The above-described basal buffer solution to be used for performing the immunoassay comprises a second pH buffering agent which exerts a buffering effect in the basic range and is different from the pH buffering agent contained in the basal buffer solution. A buffering agent with a pKa (dissociation constant) of 6 to 10, preferably 6.5 to 9.5 and more preferably 8.0 to 9.0, can be used as the second pH buffering agent. Specific examples of the second pH buffering agent include Tricine, Bicine, Tris, imidazole, triethylamine, glycylglycine, and the like. The use of a buffering agent with a pKa within the above-described range enables to maintain the antigen-antibody reaction system at a pH within a range that does not inhibit the antigen-antibody reaction even if a urine sample mixed with a strong alkaline aqueous solution is directly added to the antigen-antibody reaction system. The concentration of the second buffering agent is not particularly limited, but it is appropriately selected depending on the type of the buffering agent, and the final concentration of the second buffering agent in a reaction buffer is usually from about 10 to 200 mM, particularly from 20 to 100 mM, in the immunoassay.

(14) Examples of the cationic surfactant include alkyltrimethylammonium halides (alkyltrimethylammonium chlorides, alkyltrimethylammonium bromides), benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, alkylpyridinium chlorides, and the like, and alkyltrimethylammonium bromides or alkyltrimethylammonium chlorides, particularly alkyltrimethylammonium bromides, can preferably be used. The “alkyl” in an alkyltrimethylammonium halide is preferred to be a linear chain having 12 to 20 carbon atoms, particularly 14 to 18 carbon atoms.

(15) When the concentration of a cationic surfactant is from 0.5 to 10 mM, particularly from 2 to 6 mM, the cationic surfactant is well dissolved in water and allows fully obtaining an effect to suppress an increase in background level due to urinary contaminants.

(16) Particles can be used as the solid phase, as described above, and the particles can exist in the form of a particle buffer in which the particles are suspended in the basal buffer solution. In that case, the particle buffer comprises the cationic surfactant and the above-described second pH buffering agent, and the particle buffer is mixed with the mixture solution resulting from a). Magnetic particles are preferably used as the particles, as described above.

(17) When a particle buffer containing the cationic surfactant is used, the particle buffer preferably further comprises a zwitterionic surfactant. Among cationic surfactants, especially those having a large number of carbon atoms are less soluble in water and tend to precipitate during a long-term storage and have a risk of adversely affecting the storage stability of the magnetic particle buffer. However, by adding a zwitterionic surfactant to the mixture, precipitation of the cationic surfactant can be suppressed. Examples of the zwitterionic surfactant include CHAPS, CHAPSO, N-alkyl sulfobetaine, alkylamino sulfobetaine, and the like. A zwitterionic surfactant contains an anionic group which may result in obtaining a falsely high value and, moreover, the effect of the cationic surfactant is abolished by adding an excess amount of a zwitterionic surfactant. Therefore, a zwitterionic surfactant is preferably added at a concentration less than an equal molar quantity of the cationic surfactant. The molar concentration of the zwitterionic surfactant is preferably 10 to 90, particularly preferably 20 to 80, and further preferably 25 to 50, taking the molar concentration of the cationic surfactant as 100.

(18) In the method according to the present invention, additional steps of neutralizing and/or diluting the mixture solution resulting from a) (neutralization of the mixture solution resulting from a) with the basal buffer solution is not included in the “additional steps of neutralization and/or dilution”) are not necessary and such steps are omitted, which is an advantage in view of work efficiency and work automation.

(19) Various embodiments of the method according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

First Embodiment

(20) The first embodiment is a one-step competition assay in which a magnetic particle buffer containing bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen-immobilized magnetic particles is used with a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody. FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the antigen-antibody reaction system according to the first embodiment. Magnetic particles 12 as a solid phase linked to a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen 11, a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen 13 contained in a sample, and a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 14 are allowed to coexist and react together and then are washed to detect the antibody 14 bound to the magnetic particles 12 through the antigen 11. The higher the concentration of the antigen 13 in the sample, the smaller the amount of the labeled antibody 14 that has reacted with the antigen 11 immobilized on the magnetic particles 12 and thus the lower the obtained signal.

(21) (1) Step a): Alkaline Treatment

(22) The alkaline treatment is as described above.

(23) (2) Step b): Mixing with a Magnetic Particle Buffer

(24) The magnetic particle buffer comprises at least a second pH buffering agent, a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen-immobilized magnetic particles, and a cationic surfactant. In the step b), the urinary mixture and the magnetic particle buffer are mixed together preferably at a ratio of 1:0.1 to 1:10, particularly preferably at 1:0.2 to 1:5 and further preferably at 1:0.5 to 1:2, in order to keep the pH of a reaction buffer within a proper range and to obtain sufficient measurement sensitivity. The mixed magnetic particle buffer may be left to stand at 5 to 40° C.

(25) (2-1) Magnetic Particles

(26) Magnetic particles on the surface of which bicyclo PGE-MUM has been immobilized are used. The antigen may be bound to the magnetic particles directly or through a binding protein such as KLG (mouse monoclonal IgG), serum albumin, or KLH. For example, carboxylated magnetic particles, magnetic gelatin particles and the like can be used as the magnetic particles.

(27) (2-2) Particle Suspension, Second pH Buffering Agent, Cationic Surfactant, and Zwitterionic Surfactant

(28) The particle suspension, second pH buffering agent, cationic surfactant and zwitterionic surfactant are as described above.

(29) (3) Step c): Reaction with Labeling Solution

(30) The labeling solution comprises at least a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody. The labeled antibody may be added immediately after the urinary mixture and the magnetic particle buffer are mixed, or after the urinary mixture mixed with the magnetic particle buffer is left to stand for a while. The ratio of the magnetic particle buffer (without the urinary mixture) to the labeling solution by volume is preferably 1:0.1 to 1:10, particularly preferably 1:0.2 to 1:5, and further preferably 1:0.5 to 1:2. The reaction among the sample, the magnetic particles and the labeled antibody is performed by leaving them to stand at 5 to 40° C., preferably 25 to 40° C., for 3 to 60 minutes, preferably 5 to 10 minutes.

(31) (3-1) Dilution Buffer for Labeled Antibody

(32) A labeled antibody dilution buffer constituting the labeling solution is preferably based on a buffer solution. The conditions of the labeled antibody dilution buffer, such as composition and pH, are not particularly limited as long as those conditions are suitable to stably preserve the labeled antibody, and any buffer solution commonly used in immunoassays can be used. The pH of the labeling solution is preferably from about 6 to 8 and particularly preferably from about 6.5 to 7.5, which is a condition close to that in living bodies.

(33) (3-2) Labeled Antibody

(34) The antibody which is used as a labeled antibody is not particularly limited as long as it can specifically bind to bicyclo PGE-MUM, and any of an antiserum, a polyclonal antibody and a monoclonal antibody can be used. However, a monoclonal antibody is more preferably used since monoclonal antibodies exhibiting the same performance can be stably produced.

(35) The method for antibody labeling is not particularly limited as long as it is a labeling method available for an immunoassay, and any of known methods, such as enzymatic labeling (for example, horseradish peroxidase, and alkaline phosphatase), fluorescent labeling, and isotopic labeling, can be used. However, enzymatic labeling is preferably used since it does not need, for example, special equipment.

(36) (4) Washing Step

(37) Magnetic particles are collected and washed to remove components unbound to the particles. As the washing solution, a washing solution commonly used in an immunoassay, such as LUMIPULSE (registered trademark) (manufactured by Fujirebio Inc.), can be used.

(38) (5) Detection Step

(39) The labeled antibody bound to the magnetic particles is detected by an appropriate method according to the type of the used label; for example, when enzymatic labeling is used for antibody labeling, a substrate of the enzyme is added to detect the antibody. For example, in cases where an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is used in the labeled antibody, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) system using 3-(2′-spiro-adamantane)-4-methoxy-4-(3′-phosphoryloxy)phenyl-1,2-dioxetane disodium salt (AMPPD) as a substrate of the enzyme can be used.

(40) In the present embodiment, the antigen 13 may be a complex generated by a preceding reaction of bicyclo PGE-MUM with a molecule that specifically binds to the same (for example, anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody). In this case, the labeled antibody 14 is preferably an antibody that specifically binds not to simple PGE-MUM but to the above complex.

Second Embodiment

(41) The second embodiment is a one-step competition assay in which an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized magnetic particles and a labeled bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen are used. The antigen-antibody reaction system according to the second embodiment is shown in FIG. 2. Magnetic particles 22 on which an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 21 has been immobilized, a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen 23 contained in a sample, and a labeled bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen 24 are allowed to coexist and react together and then are washed to detect the labeled antigen 24 bound to the magnetic particles 22 through the antibody 21. The higher the concentration of the antigen 23 in the sample, the smaller the amount of the labeled antigen 24 binding to the magnetic particles 22 through the antibody 21 and thus the lower the obtained signal.

(42) The present embodiment has the same various conditions as those of the first embodiment, except that the antibody, instead of the antigen, is immobilized on the magnetic particles and the antigen, instead of the antibody, is labeled.

Third Embodiment

(43) The third embodiment is a two-step sandwich assay in which an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized magnetic particles and a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody are used. The antigen-antibody reaction system according to the third embodiment is shown in FIG. 3. Magnetic particles 32 on which an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 31 has been immobilized and a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen 33 contained in a sample react together, are washed, and then react with a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 34, and then are washed to detect the labeled antibody 34 bound to the magnetic particles 32 through the antibody 31 and the antigen 33. The higher the concentration of the antigen 33 in the sample, the larger the amount of the labeled antibody 34 bound to the magnetic particles 32 and thus the higher the obtained signal.

(44) The present embodiment has the same various conditions as those of the first embodiment, except that the antibody, instead of the antigen, is immobilized on the magnetic particles and the magnetic particles are washed prior to the reaction with the labeled antibody.

Fourth Embodiment

(45) The fourth embodiment is a one-step competitive ELISA in which a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen-immobilized microwell plate and a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody are used. The antigen-antibody reaction system according to the fourth embodiment is shown in FIG. 4. A microwell plate 42 on which a bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen 41 has been immobilized is filled with a sample treatment solution 45 containing a pH buffering agent and a cationic surfactant (FIG. 4A) and then a urinary mixture (sample) is added thereto (FIG. 4B). A labeling solution containing a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 44 is further added thereto (FIG. 4C). The labeled antibody 44 reacts with the immobilized antigen 41 and an antigen 43 contained in the sample, and the labeled antibody 44 bound to the immobilized antigen 41 is detected after washing the plate (FIG. 4D). The higher the concentration of the antigen 43 contained in the sample, the smaller the amount of the labeled antibody 44 bound to the immobilized antigen 41 and thus the lower the obtained signal.

(46) The present embodiment has the same various conditions as those of the first embodiment, except that the antigen is immobilized not on magnetic particles but on a microwell plate and the sample treatment solution without any magnetic particles is used instead of a magnetic particle buffer.

(47) With regard to the microwell plate used in the present embodiment, any known microwell plate commonly used in enzyme immunoassays (for example, ELISA) can be used regardless of its shape, material and dimensions.

Fifth Embodiment

(48) The fifth embodiment is a two-step sandwich ELISA in which an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody-immobilized microwell plate and a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody are used. The antigen-antibody reaction system according to the fifth embodiment is shown in FIG. 5. A microwell plate 52 on which an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 51 has been immobilized is filled with a sample treatment solution 55 containing a pH buffering agent and a cationic surfactant (FIG. 5A) and then a urinary mixture (sample) is added thereto to react a bicyclo PGE antigen 53 in the sample with the antibody 51 (FIG. 5B). The microwell plate 52 is washed and then a labeling solution containing a labeled anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody 54 is added thereto and allowed to react (FIG. 5C). The microwell plate is washed and the labeled antibody 54 bound to the antibody 51 through the antigen 53 is detected (FIG. 5D). The higher the concentration of the antigen 53 contained in the sample, the larger the amount of the labeled antibody 54 bound to the antibody 51 and thus the higher the obtained signal.

(49) The present embodiment has the same various conditions as those of the fourth embodiment, except that the antibody, instead of the antigen, is immobilized on the microwell plate and a sandwich assay is applied instead of a competition assay.

Further Embodiments

(50) The present invention is not limited to the first to fifth embodiments, but may be practiced with appropriately making changes in the material and shape of the solid phase to which an antigen or an antibody is bound, the combination of the immobilized antigen/antibody and the labeled antibody/antigen, and the conditions of the one-step/two-step competition/sandwich assay.

(51) A cationic surfactant in a magnetic particle buffer (or a sample treatment solution) may cause reduction in stability of an antibody depending on the nature of the used antibody and, thus, a system in which an antigen, rather than an antibody, has been immobilized may be more preferable.

(52) A Kit for the Measurement of the Prostaglandin E Main Urinary Metabolite (PGE-MUM)

(53) The kit according to the present invention comprises a solid phase on which a bicyclo PGE-MUM or an anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antibody is immobilized; a second pH buffering agent which exerts a buffering effect in the basic range in a weakly-acidic basal buffer solution which is different from the pH buffering agent contained in the basal buffer solution; and a cationic surfactant. In addition to these, a labeled antibody solution as described above, an alkaline aqueous solution for alkaline treatment, and a standard solution for standard curve preparation may be provided. Examples of the solid phase include particles, preferably magnetic particles, and the microplate, described above.

(54) The standard solutions can be prepared by dissolving known amounts of bicyclo PGE-MUM in a known buffer solution, such as Tris or phosphate buffer. A set of standard solutions can be prepared to have 2 to 10 different concentrations in the range from 0 to 300 ng/mL but it is not limited to those conditions.

(55) The present invention will be described specifically by way of examples. However, the present invention is not limited to the following examples.

Reference Example 1

(56) Measurement by Conventional Method (Radioimmunoassay (RIA))

(57) Measurement of PGE-MUM was performed on 8 urine samples from volunteers by a conventional method.

(58) A 50-μL urine sample was mixed with 100 μL of 1 N NaOH and the resulting mixture was left to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes. The mixture was neutralized by adding 100 μL of 1 N hydrochloric acid thereto, and the mixture was further supplemented with and diluted with 1000 μL of an assay buffer (composition: 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 0.1% gelatin, and 0.1% sodium azide). A 100-μL aliquot was withdrawn from 1250 μL of the diluted mixture and mixed with 100 μL of a tracer solution (composition: .sup.125I-labeled bicyclo PGE-MUM, and the assay buffer) containing a known concentration of a .sup.125I-labeled bicyclo PGE-MUM. Furthermore, 100 μL of a rabbit anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM antiserum solution (composition: an antiserum, and the assay buffer) was added thereto and the resulting mixture was left to stand at room temperature for two hours. Then, a separation solution containing anti-rabbit IgG antibody-immobilized magnetic particles (composition: the antibody-immobilized magnetic particles at 0.02% (w/v), and the assay buffer) was added thereto and the resulting mixture was left to stand at room temperature for 15 minutes. The magnetic particles were collected and washed to remove components unbound to the magnetic particles, and the remaining .sup.125I (bound to the magnetic particles) was counted. The PGE-MUM value in the urine sample was calculated based on a standard curve from the above count. Similarly to the sample, the radioactivity count was measured for standard solutions each containing an amount of bicyclo PGE-MUM corresponding to 0, 2.05, 6.25, 18.5, 55.5, 166.5, or 500 ng/mL in terms of the amounts before dilution, and a standard curve was prepared based on the obtained counts from the respective standard solutions.

Comparative Example 1 Measurement by Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay (CLEIA) with Neutralization and Dilution Steps (No Cationic Surfactant)

(59) Measurement of PGE-MUM was performed on the same 8 urine samples from volunteers as in Reference Example 1 by the following method. A 50-μL urine sample was mixed with 100 μL of 1 N NaOH and the resulting mixture was left to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes. The mixture was neutralized by adding 100 μL of 1 N hydrochloric acid thereto and mixing the resulting mixture, and the mixture was further supplemented with and diluted with 1000 μL of a RIA assay buffer (composition: 9.5 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, 40.5 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, and gelatin, pH 7.4). A 10-μL aliquot was withdrawn from 1250 μL of the diluted mixture and mixed with 50 μL of a labeled antibody solution (composition: an ALP-labeled antibody, 50 mM Tris, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM zinc chloride, sucrose, and gelatin, pH 7.4) containing an alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-labeled mouse anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM monoclonal antibody and the resulting mixture was allowed to react at 37° C. for 8 minutes. A 50-μL magnetic particle buffer containing bicyclo PGE-MUM antigen-immobilized magnetic particles (composition: the antigen-immobilized magnetic particles at 0.02% (w/v), 9.5 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, 40.5 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, and gelatin, pH 7.4) was added thereto and the resulting mixture was allowed to react at 37° C. for 8 minutes. The magnetic particles were collected and washed to remove components unbound to the magnetic particles, and a substrate solution containing AMPPD (LUMIPULSE (registered trademark) substrate solution, Fujirebio Inc.) in a volume of 200 μL was added thereto. The intensity of luminescence generated by an enzymatic reaction was counted at a wavelength of 417 nm, and the PGE-MUM value in the urine sample was calculated based on a standard curve from the above count. Similarly to the sample, the luminescence intensity was measured for standard solutions each containing an amount of bicyclo PGE-MUM corresponding to 0, 3, 10, 50, or 200 ng of PGE-MUM per mL, and a standard curve was prepared based on the obtained amounts of luminescence from the respective standard solutions. The steps following the neutralization step in this Comparative Example were performed using the automated analyzer LUMIPULSE Presto 11 (registered trademark, Fujirebio Inc).

Comparative Example 2 Measurement by CLEIA with Omission of Neutralization and Dilution Steps (No Cationic Surfactant)

(60) Measurement of PGE-MUM was performed on the same 8 urine samples from volunteers as in Reference Example 1 by the following method. A 10-μL urine sample was mixed with 30 μL of 0.3 N NaOH and the resulting mixture was allowed to react at 37° C. for 6.5 minutes. A 50-μL magnetic particle buffer containing bicyclo PGE-MUM-immobilized magnetic particles (composition: the antigen-immobilized magnetic particles at 0.02% (w/v), 219.25 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, 30.75 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, 50 mM Tricine, 300 mM sodium chloride, and gelatin, pH 5.5) and, furthermore, a 50-μL labeled antibody solution (composition: an ALP-labeled antibody, 50 mM Tris, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM zinc chloride, sucrose, and gelatin, pH 7.4) containing an ALP-labeled mouse anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM monoclonal antibody were added thereto and the resulting mixture was allowed to react at 37° C. for 16 minutes. The magnetic particles were collected and washed to remove components unbound to the magnetic particles, and a substrate solution containing AMPPD (LUMIPULSE (registered trademark) substrate solution, Fujirebio Inc.) in a volume of 200 μL was added thereto. The intensity of luminescence generated by an enzymatic reaction was counted, and the PGE-MUM value in the urine sample was calculated based on a standard curve from the above count. Similarly to the sample, the luminescence intensity was measured for standard solutions each containing an amount of bicyclo PGE-MUM corresponding to 0, 3, 10, 50, or 200 ng of PGE-MUM per mL, and a standard curve was prepared based on the obtained amounts of luminescence from the respective standard solutions. All the steps following the alkaline treatment step in this Comparative Example were performed using the automated analyzer LUMIPULSE Presto II (registered trademark, Fujirebio Inc.).

Example 1

(61) Measurement of PGE-MUM was performed on the same 8 urine samples from volunteers as used in Reference Example 1 by the following method. A 10-μL urine sample was mixed with 30 μL of 0.3 N NaOH and the resulting mixture was allowed to react at 37° C. for 6.5 minutes. A 50-μL magnetic particle buffer containing bicyclo PGE-MUM-immobilized magnetic particles (composition: the antigen-immobilized magnetic particles at 0.02% (w/v), 219.25 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, 30.75 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, 50 mM Tricine, 300 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM C.sub.16 alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (C16TAB), 2 mM CHAPS, and gelatin, pH 5.5) and, furthermore, a 50-μL labeled antibody solution (composition: an ALP-labeled antibody, 50 mM Tris, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM zinc chloride, sucrose, and gelatin, pH 7.4) containing an ALP-labeled mouse anti-bicyclo PGE-MUM monoclonal antibody were added thereto and the resulting mixture was allowed to react at 37° C. for 16 minutes. The magnetic particles were collected and washed to remove components unbound to the magnetic particles, and a substrate solution containing AMPPD (LUMIPULSE (registered trademark) substrate solution, Fujirebio Inc.) in a volume of 200 μL was added thereto. The intensity of luminescence generated by an enzymatic reaction was counted, and the PGE-MUM value in the urine sample was calculated based on a standard curve from the above count.

(62) The measurement results from Reference Example 1, Comparative Example 1, Comparative Example 2 and Example 1 are shown in Table 1 and FIG. 6. FIG. 6A shows the correlation between the measurement result of Reference Example 1 and that of Comparative Example 1, and FIG. 6B shows the correlation between the measurement result of Reference Example 1 and that of Comparative Example 2, and FIG. 6C shows the correlation between the measurement result of Reference Example 1 and that of Example 1.

(63) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparative Example 1 Comparative Example 2 Example 1 Reference Example 1 Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Sample (conventional method) value value measured by value value measured by value value measured by No. Measured value (ng/mL) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) 1 6.88 19.7 286 27.8 404 7.60 110 2 9.95 24.6 247 33.2 334 7.30 73.4 3 106 142 134 216 204 108 102 4 18.8 45.1 240 62.9 335 18.9 101 5 20.9 44.2 211 61.3 293 21.7 104 6 5.28 15.4 292 21.3 403 3.70 70.1 7 23.7 46.9 198 67.1 283 26.6 112 8 12.2 30.4 249 47.7 391 9.20 75.4

(64) In the cases where the CLEIA assays were used, a result relatively close to that from the conventional method (Reference Example 1) is obtained by performing the neutralization and dilution steps (Comparative Example 1). On the other hand, when the neutralization and dilution steps were omitted (Comparative Example 2), reduction or inhibition of immune reaction by the strong alkali was not observed because of the effects of the buffering agents but rather, a tendency to provide a significantly higher measurement value than that obtained by the conventional method was observed. It was inferred that this result was caused by an increased influence of contaminants in urine due to the omission of the dilution step. When C.sub.7-16 surfactants each containing an anionic group were added to artificial urine and then the measurement was performed on those resulting mixtures, high measurement values similar to the above value were obtained (data not shown). Therefore, it was inferred that urinary contaminants having physical properties close to those of the above surfactants affected the measurement values. On the other hand, it was confirmed that use of the method of Example 1 gave a result almost equal to that from the conventional method, with regard to the measured PGE-MUM values. It is understood that this result was caused by a reduced influence of urinary contaminants (which are speculated to have an anionic group) due to the addition of the cationic surfactant. Accordingly, addition of a cationic surfactant enabled measurement of PGE-MUM without an influence of urinary contaminants in alkaline treated samples, with omission of neutralization and dilution steps.

Example 2 Test for the Effects of Various Cationic Substances

(65) Measurement of PGE-MUM was performed on 4 urine samples under the same conditions as in Comparative Example 2, except that an alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (C12TAB, C14TAB, or C16TAB), or an alkyltrimethylammonium chloride (C14TAC, C16TAC, or C18TAC) was added to a concentration of 1 mM in a magnetic particle buffer. The results of the PGE-MUM measurement using the magnetic particle buffers each supplemented with a different cationic substance are shown in Table 2. In any of the measurements, a tendency to provide a lower measurement value compared to the measurement value of Comparative Example 2 in which no cationic substance was added was observed, while a tendency to provide a measurement value close to that obtained by the conventional method was observed particularly in the cases of using C16TAB, C14TAB, and C18TAC, respectively.

(66) Additionally, besides the above-described cationic substances, inorganic cationic substances such as metal ions and low-molecular-weight cationic substances were added at a similar concentration to examine their effects but none of the cationic substances showed the effect to reduce the measurement value of PGE-MUM as seen in C16TAB (data not shown).

(67) Accordingly, it was suggested that addition of an organic cationic substance, particularly a cationic surfactant whose number of carbon atoms is equal to or above a certain number, was effective to avoid the influence of urinary contaminants.

(68) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Conventional method C12TAB C14TAB C16TAB Measured Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Sample value value value measured by value value measured by value value measured by No. (ng/mL) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) 1 6.88 24.7 359 14.8 215 11.2 163 2 9.95 30.2 304 16.3 164 12.4 125 3 106 High — 169 159 134 126 4 18.8 62.7 334 40.3 214 27.8 148 Conventional method C14TAC C16TAC C18TAC Measured Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Sample value value value measured by value value measured by value value measured by No. (ng/mL) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) 1 6.88 14.9 217 18.1 263 11.3 164 2 9.95 17.1 172 19.9 200 12.1 122 3 106 180 170 189 178 159 150 4 18.8 36.8 196 43.7 232 29.2 155

Example 3 Study on Cationic Surfactant Concentration

(69) The surfactant which was most effective in avoiding the influence of urinary contaminants as seen in Table 2, C16TAB, was used to study the optimal concentration.

(70) Measurement of PGE-MUM was performed similarly to Comparative Example 2 on the 8 urine samples shown in Table 1, except that C16TAB was added to a concentration of 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mM in the magnetic particle buffer. The respective measured values are shown in Table 3. It was found that a higher concentration of C16TAB added to the magnetic particle buffer tended to produce a smaller measurement value, which is a measurement value close to that obtained by the conventional method. On the other hand, when the concentration of C16TAB was more than 3.0 mM, C16TAB was hardly dissolved and also showed a tendency to precipitate over time after preparation of the magnetic particle buffer and thus to easily cause reduction of the luminescence intensity in the measurement system (data not shown).

(71) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Conventional C16TAB concentration method 1.0 mM 2.0 mM 3.0 mM Measured Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Measured Percentage relative to Sample value value value measured by value value measured by value value measured by No. (ng/mL) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) (ng/mL) conventional method (%) 1 6.88 13.4 195 10.9 158 8.70 127 2 9.95 14.7 148 12.2 123 9.10 91.5 3 106 130 123 115 109 94.0 88.7 4 18.8 31.5 168 26.2 139 22.4 119 5 20.9 34.7 166 29.3 140 24.4 117 6 5.28 7.00 133 5.60 106 4.40 83.3 7 23.7 39.7 168 33.3 141 28.6 121 8 12.2 19.6 161 14.8 121 10.6 86.9 Average — — 158 — 130 — 104

Example 4 Addition of a Zwitterionic Surfactant to a Magnetic Particle Buffer

(72) Further addition of another surfactant to the magnetic particle buffer was studied in order to suppress the precipitation of a cationic surfactant (C16TAB) in the magnetic particle buffer and to stably provide a suppressive effect on increase in measurement values.

(73) The magnetic particle buffer of Comparative Example 2 was supplemented with C16TAB at 2 mM and a zwitterionic surfactant (CHAPS) at 0.1 mM or 1.0 mM or a nonionic surfactant (Brij 35) at 0.1 mM or 1.0 mM to prepare mixtures. For 4 days, a portion of each mixture was left to stand at 4° C. and another portion of each mixture was left to stand at 37° C. Besides, a magnetic particle buffer containing neither zwitterionic surfactant nor nonionic surfactant was also prepared as a blank. Measurement was performed on 4 urine samples under the same conditions as in Comparative Example 2, except that these magnetic particle buffers were used.

(74) The measurement results are shown in Table 4-1 to Table 4-3. In the magnetic particle buffers to which the nonionic surfactant Brij 35 was added, the addition of the surfactant at 1.0 mM prevented the precipitation of C16TAB and resulted in showing an improved stability, but the effect of C16TAB to suppress an increase in background level was reduced. On the other hand, in the magnetic particle buffers to which the zwitterionic surfactant CHAPS was added, the addition of the surfactant at 1.0 mM prevented the precipitation of C16TAB and resulted in showing an improved stability, and the effect of C16TAB to suppress an increase in background level was maintained.

(75) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4-1 Blank Conventional — method Luminescence count Measured value (ng/mL) Measured Ratio between Percentage relative to value Sample value Mixture Mixture stored mixtures stored at Mixture stored measured by Conventional No. (ng/mL) stored at 4° C. at 37° C. 37° C. and at 4° C. (%) at 4° C. method (%) 1 6.88 546028 377058 69.1 9.10 132 2 9.95 539574.0 353145 65.4 9.20 92.5 3 106 68161 45328 66.5 119 112 4 18.8 273259 177941 65.1 23.2 123

(76) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4-2 Brij 35 concentration 0.1 mM 1.0 mM Measured value (ng/mL) Measured Percentage value (ng/mL) Conventional Luminescence count relative Luminescence count Percentage method Mixture Mixture Ratio between to value Mixture Mixture Ratio between Mixture relative to value Measured stored stored mixtures stored Mixture measured by stored stored mixtures stored stored measured by Sample value at at at 37° C. and at stored at Conventional at at at 37° C. and at at Conventional No. (ng/mL) 4° C. 37° C. 4° C. (%) 4° C. method (%) 4° C. 37° C. 4° C. (%) 4° C. method (%) 1 6.88 575315 409654 71.2 11.3 164 604096 551348 91.3 11.1 161 2 9.95 574768 406428 70.7 11.3 114 609212 551544 90.5 11.0 111 3 106 72762 54617 75.1 177.2 167 72521 71143 98.1 167 158 4 18.8 287557 204464 71.1 31.2 166 293577 268067 91.3 29.6 157

(77) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 4-3 CHAPS concentration 0.1 mM 1.0 mM Measured value (ng/mL) Measured Percentage value (ng/mL) Conventional Luminescence count relative Luminescence count Percentage method Mixture Mixture Ratio between to value Mixture Mixture Ratio between Mixture relative to value Measured stored stored mixtures stored Mixture measured by stored stored mixtures stored stored measured by Sample value at at at 37° C. and at stored at Conventional at at at 37° C. and at at Conventional No. (ng/mL) 4° C. 37° C. 4° C. (%) 4° C. method (%) 4° C. 37° C. 4° C. (%) 4° C. method (%) 1 6.88 556088 394035 70.9 10.3 150 533963 492599 92.3 10.2 148 2 9.95 556763 411981 74.0 9.60 96 545749 480073 88.0 9.80 98.5 3 106 67245 44907 66.8 175 165 69925 56076 80.2 146 137 4 18.8 282573 203785 72.1 26.0 138 278466 232195 83.4 26.4 140

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

(78) The method and kit according to the present invention are used to measure the main metabolite of human prostaglandin E in urine and are useful for determining, for example, the stage of ulcerative colitis, whether remission phase or not, and the stage of interstitial pneumonia, and thus can be widely used in medical field.