Ultra-broadband mode size converter based on an on-chip Luneburg lens

20220006201 · 2022-01-06

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    The silicon waveguides consist of an input waveguide and an output waveguide, and the input and output silicon waveguides are arranged on the both sides of the Luneburg lens, respectively. The width of the input waveguide is larger than that of the output waveguide. The structure of the Luneburg lens is a metamaterial layer of the periodic silicon nanorod antenna array, which the upper cladding and the lower cladding are SiO.sub.2. The required refractive index distributions by the Luneburg lens can be implemented through the metamaterial structure of the gradient index profiles.

    Claims

    1. An ultra-broadband mode size converter based on an on-chip Luneburg lens, including a Luneburg lens, an input waveguide and an output waveguide, where the input waveguide and the output waveguide are arranged at both sides of Luneburg lens, respectively. The silicon waveguide includes: an input waveguide and an output waveguide; the structure of the Luneburg lens is a metamaterial layer with both upper and lower cladding layers of silicon dioxide, and the metamaterial layer is a silicon nanorod antenna array structure with gradient index profiles.

    2. The ultra-broadband mode size converter according to claim 1, where the width of the first waveguide 5 is greater than the width of the second waveguide 6.

    3. The ultra-broadband mode size converter according to claim 1, where the Luneburg lens has a radial duty ratio distribution, and the refractive index distribution satisfies n(R)=n.sub.e √{square root over (2−(R/R.sub.lens).sup.2)}, where n.sub.e is the edge refractive index, and R.sub.lens is the radius of the lens, R is the radial distance from the center of the Luneburg lens, and the length of the Luneburg lens is L=2R.sub.lens.

    4. The ultra-broadband mode size converter according to claim 1, where the relationship between the maximum refractive index and the minimum refractive index is n.sub.max=√{square root over (2)}n.sub.min.

    5. The ultra-broadband mode size converter according to claim 1, where the equivalent material refractive index of the Luneburg lens is n.sub.meta(R).sup.2=δ(R).Math.n.sub.Si.sup.2+[1−δ(R)].Math.n.sub.SiO.sub.2.sup.2, where n.sub.meta(R), n.sub.Si and n.sub.SiO2 are equivalent materials, silicon and silica, δ(R) is the duty cycle of the nanorods.

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0017] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the structure of the proposed mode size converter.

    [0018] FIG. 2 is a simulated transmission spectrum of the device.

    [0019] FIG. 3 is a simulated spectrum at the wavelength of 1.55 μm for TE.sub.0 mode.

    [0020] FIG. 4 is a simulated spectrum at the wavelength of 1.26 μm for TE.sub.0 mode.

    [0021] FIG. 5 is a simulated spectrum of at the wavelength of 2 μm for TE.sub.0 mode.

    [0022] In the FIG. 1, an integrated Luneburg lens is marked 1, silicon waveguide is marked 2, input position is marked 3, output position is marked 4, first waveguide is marked 5, second waveguide is marked 6.

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION

    [0023] As shown in FIG. 1, this solution relates to an ultra-broadband mode size converter based on an integrated Luneburg lens, which can be implemented on a SOI platform, including: an integrated Luneburg lens 1 and the silicon waveguide 2, the input position 3 and the output position 4, where the input position 3 and the output position 4 are arranged on both sides of the Luneburg lens 1, respectively.

    [0024] The silicon waveguide 2 includes: a first waveguide 5 and a second waveguide 6, where the first waveguide 5 is arranged on the input position 3, and the second waveguide 6 is arranged on the output position 4.

    [0025] The structure of the Luneburg lens 1 is a metamaterial layer with both upper and lower cladding layers of silicon dioxide, where the metamaterial layer is a silicon periodic nanorod array with gradient index profiles, and the effective refractive index depends on the duty cycle of the silicon nanorods array. The period of the nanorods is P. The metamaterial layer realizes the function of the Luneburg lens, reducing the footprint with low loss.

    [0026] The width of the first waveguide 5 and the diameter of the Luneburg lens 1 can be adjusted according to practical applications.

    [0027] The width of the first waveguide 5 is greater than the width of the second waveguide 6, and the expansion ratio of the first waveguide 5 and the second waveguide 6 is 20:1, and the expansion ratio can be adjusted according to practical applications.

    [0028] The Luneburg lens 1 has a radial duty cycle distribution, and the refractive index distribution satisfies n(R)=n.sub.e √{square root over (2−(R/R.sub.lens).sup.2)}, where n.sub.e is the edge refractive index, R.sub.lens is the radius of the Luneburg lens 1, and R is the radial distance from the center of the Luneburg lens 1. The length of Luneburg lens 1 is L=2R.sub.lens.

    [0029] The relationship between the maximum refractive index and the minimum refractive index in the Luneburg lens 1 is n.sub.max=√{square root over (2)}n.sub.min.

    [0030] The refractive index of the equivalent material of the Luneburg lens 1 is n.sub.meta(R).sup.2=δ(R).Math.n.sub.Si.sup.2+[1−δ(R)].Math.n.sub.SiO.sub.2.sup.2, where n.sub.meta(R), n.sub.Si and n.sub.SiO2 are the refractive indexes of the equivalent material, silicon and silicon dioxide, respectively. δ(R) is the duty cycle of the nanorods. The duty cycle ranges from 0 to 100%. Considering the feasibility of the experiment, the minimum duty cycle is set to 15%.

    [0031] The solutions simulation relates to an ultra-broadband mode size converter, which includes the following steps:

    [0032] Step 1: Set simulation parameters;

    [0033] The thickness of the silicon layer on the SOI platform is 220 nm, the thickness of the buried oxide layer is 3 μm, and the thickness of the cladding silicon dioxide layer is 1 μm. The width of the first waveguide 5 and the second waveguide 6 are set to 10 μm and 0.5 μm, respectively. The minimum duty cycle of the nanorods is set to 15% so that the minimum effective refractive index is 1.84. The maximum duty ratio is set to 81% so that the maximum refractive index is 2.6. The period is 246 nm, and the length of the lens is L=2R.sub.lens=11.2 μm.

    [0034] Step 2: Calculate the insertion loss and operation bandwidth according to the simulation parameters.

    [0035] As shown in FIG. 2, the insertion loss is lower than 1 dB in the wavelength range of 1.26 μm to 2 μm. Therefore, the mode size converter has a 740 nm-bandwidth with low insertion loss.

    [0036] Step 3: Changing the parameters of the first waveguide 5, the second waveguide 6 and the Luneburg lens 1, and calculating the effective refractive index of the TM fundamental mode under different wavelengths.

    [0037] As shown in FIG. 3, FIG. 4, and FIG. 5, the distribution of the electric field (Ey) of the TE fundamental mode when the wavelength is 1.55 μm, 1.26 μm and 2 μm, respectively. Some parameters of the lens can also be adjusted to match with the effective refractive index of the TM fundamental mode, so that the conversion of the mode size for the TM fundamental mode can be achieved.

    [0038] In the experiments, under normal room temperature, the C- and O-band laser are employed as input light source, the width of the first waveguide 5 and the second waveguide 6 are 10 μm and 0.5 μm, respectively. The minimum duty cycle of the nanorods is set to 15% so that the minimum effective refractive index is 1.84. The maximum duty cycle is set to 81% so that the maximum refractive index is 2.6. The period is 246 nm, the length of the lens is L=2R.sub.lens=11.2 μm. The mode size conversion is lower than 1 dB in the wavelength of 1260 nm˜1360 nm and 1507 nm˜1607 nm.

    [0039] Compared with the reported mode size converter, this device can realize the conversion from 1.26 μm to 2 μm with a bandwidth of 740 nm, which is better than the performance of the existing taper structure. The conversion loss of the mode size is lower than 1 dB, which is better than the performance of the existing Hollow taper. The length of the device is 11.2 μm, and the footprint is more compact than a flat lens and other lens structures.

    [0040] The above-mentioned specific implementations can be locally adjusted by different ways without departing from the principle and purpose of the invention. The protection scope of the invention is subject to the claims and is not limited by the above-mentioned specific implementations. All implementation schemes within the scope are bound by the invention.