Container treatment system for treating containers
11787202 · 2023-10-17
Assignee
Inventors
- Helmut Schuesslburner (Straubing, DE)
- Konrad Senn (Alteglofsheim, DE)
- Sven Kerpe (Linkenheim-Hochstetten, DE)
- Frank Schulze (Schwarzenbach am Wald, DE)
- Thomas Gruber (Riekofen, DE)
- Thomas Schnitger (Eisenach, DE)
Cpc classification
B41J3/4073
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B41J3/445
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B67C7/002
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B41J3/407
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B41J3/44
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Container treatment system for treating containers, such as bottles, with at least one direct printing machine for applying a print image onto containers and at least one container treatment machine arranged upstream of the direct printing machine and a system control device, where the system control device is configured to control the operation of the container treatment machine in dependence of a change of the container throughput that can be obtained with the direct printing machine.
Claims
1. A container treatment system for treating containers, with at least one direct printing machine for applying a print image onto containers and at least one container treatment machine, arranged upstream of said direct printing machine as well as a system control device, where said system control device is configured to control an operation of said container treatment machine in dependence of a change in the container throughput that can be obtained with said direct printing machine, where controlling the operation of said container treatment machine comprises controlling a container throughput of said container treatment machine, where said system control device controls the container throughput of said container treatment machine such that that it is equal to the changed container throughput of said direct printing machine, with the exception of during an optional lead time.
2. The container treatment system according to claim 1, where controlling the container throughput of said container treatment machine by said system control device comprises changing the spacing between the containers, that are output by said container treatment machine, in dependence of a change in the container throughput of said direct printing machine.
3. The container treatment system according to claim 1, where said container treatment system comprises at least one of the following container treatment machines: a container washing machine, a container dryer, a pretreatment machine, a container cooler, a container inspection machine.
4. The container treatment system according to claim 3, where said container treatment system comprises at least two of said container treatment machines that differ from one another and where a first transport device is arranged between said container treatment machines for transporting containers from one container treatment machine downstream to a further container treatment machine, and where at least one second transport device is provided which can supply said containers from said container treatment machine, that in a direction of transport of said containers is the last one, to said direct printing machine.
5. The container treatment system according to claim 4, where at least one of said container treatment machines and/or said first transport device and/or the second transport device comprises a buffer region for buffering containers.
6. A method for controlling an operation of a container treatment machine of a container treatment system for treating containers, which comprises at least one direct printing machine and the container treatment machine arranged upstream of said direct printing machine as well as a system control device, where said system control device controls the operation of said container treatment machine in dependence of a change in the container throughput that can be obtained with said direct printing machine during operation, where controlling the operation of said container treatment machine comprises controlling a container throughput of said container treatment machine, where said system control device controls the container throughput of said container treatment machine such that that it is equal to the changed container throughput of said direct printing machine, with the exception of during an optional lead time.
7. The method according to claim 6, where controlling the operation of said container treatment machine by said system control device comprises changing the spacing of the containers, that are output by said container treatment machine, in dependence of a change in the container throughput of said direct printing machine.
8. The method according to claim 6, where the container throughput of said direct printing machine reduces to a new value and where said system control device controls the operation of said container treatment machine such that excess containers are buffered in a buffer region.
9. The method according to claim 6, where the container throughput of said direct printing machine increases to a new value and where said system control device increases the container throughput of said container treatment machine to a value that corresponds to the new value and supplies containers from a buffer region to said direct printing machine for an optional lead time.
10. The method according to claim 6, where said system control device increases the container throughput of said container treatment machine via the container throughput of said direct printing machine during a pre-buffering time and supplies a number of excess containers to a buffer region, while the container throughput of said direct printing machine does not change.
11. The method according to claim 6, where said container treatment system comprises at least two container treatment machines arranged upstream of said direct printing machine and where a first of said container treatment machines carries out time-critical container treatment and a second of the container treatment machines carries out non-time-critical container treatment, where said system control device controls the operation of said second container treatment machine in dependence of a change in the container throughput that can be obtained with said direct printing machine during operation and continues unchanged operation of said first container treatment machine.
12. The method according to claim 11, where said first container treatment machine is arranged upstream of said second container treatment machine and where the container throughput of said direct printing machine reduces and said system control device controls the operation of said second container treatment machine such that a number of containers supplied to said direct printing machine by said second container treatment machine corresponds to the reduced container throughput and an excess of containers from said first container treatment machine is buffered in said second container treatment machine and/or a buffer region associated with said second container treatment machine.
13. The method according to claim 11, where said second container treatment machine is arranged upstream of said first container treatment machine and where the container throughput of said direct printing machine reduces and said system control device controls the operation of said second container treatment machine such that a number of containers supplied to said first container treatment machine corresponds to the reduced container throughput.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(4)
(5) Several container treatment machines 102 to 105 are disposed between the point of supply and the point of reception. They are not limited in number. In particular, there can be more or fewer container treatment machines than illustrated. Furthermore, for example, a further container treatment machine can be arranged between point of supply 101 and container treatment machine 102. An additional container treatment machine can also be arranged downstream of container treatment machine 105, but upstream of point of reception 106.
(6) According to the invention, it is only provided that at least container treatment machine 105 is a direct printing machine which can print onto containers such as bottles or the like using direct printing technology (for example, inkjet printing). At least one further container treatment machines can be arranged according to the invention upstream of direct printing machine 105. They are not restricted in terms of their function. For example, machines can be provided for pre-treating the containers, for inspecting the containers, or for cleaning and drying or cooling the containers. Container treatment machines 103 and 104 (and possibly further container treatment machines) can therefore be, for example, container washing machines, container dryers, pretreatment machines, container coolers, or container inspection machines.
(7) Further container treatment machines, such as container treatment machine 102 as well as point of supply 101 and point of reception 106 of containers, are not to be understood according to the invention to be restrictive and are therefore only used in
(8) According to the invention, a system control device 180 is provided which can control the operation of direct printing machine 105 and at least one of container treatment machines 103 and 104 arranged in region 120 outlined by dashed lines. System control device 180 can of course also be configured to control container treatment machine 102. The system control device can be configured in principle to control each container treatment machine, including point of supply 101 and point of reception 106, as well as each transport device in the system. While selectively controlling container treatment machines 103 and 104 shall be discussed hereafter, it is implicitly understood that the other container treatment machines, in particular container treatment machine 102, can also be controlled by the system control device.
(9) Region 120 differs from other regions in the container treatment system in that certain requirements for the transportation and treatment of the containers must be fulfilled in this region in order to be able to ensure the requirements for the direct print for containers. For example, the containers contacting one another before they are supplied to the direct printing machine is typically disadvantageous since this can cause, for example, abrasions on the surface. As a result, not only can the surface of the container itself be damaged, but also, for example, a primer layer applied in one of container treatment machines 103 or 104 (applied, for example, by way of flame pyrolysis or plasma) can be removed. Such layers are typically applied to improve the adhesion properties of printing ink to the surface of the container. If this layer is removed at least in part by physical contact among the containers, then the quality of the print images, which are thereafter applied to a damaged region, reduces.
(10) Machine 102 can in principle be of any desired type. However, it is a separation device which controls the number of containers that are fed to machine 103.
(11) In addition to the container treatment machines, a number of transport devices 112, 123, 134, 145 and 156 are also shown in
(12) System control device 180 can either be configured as a central control device (in the form of a computer or data processor or the like) and can be connected to direct printing machine 105 and at least one further container treatment machine 104 or 103 via connections 181 presently shown only by way of example for preferably bidirectional data exchange. In addition, the system control device can also be connected to the individual transport devices between the container treatment machines at least in region 120.
(13) However, the system control device can also be configured differently. For example, in addition to or as an alternative to the central control unit, a series of control units provided specifically for a container treatment machine or a container treatment machine and the transport devices associated therewith and/or a transport device can be provided. There as well, this can be suitable computers or data processors which, however, then control only specific container treatment machines and/or transport devices. In this embodiment, the control devices are preferably interconnected at least for the purpose of data exchange. This can also be done by suitable (bidirectional) data lines, in analogy to data lines 180. The data lines can be configured physically (as a LAN cable or the like) or wirelessly (for example as a wireless LAN network).
(14) The containers typically do not touch each other when transported through the container treatment system during “normal” operation. In more general terms, once the operating parameters have been set and there are no malfunctions, then the requirements of direct printing onto the containers in the direct printing machine can typically be met without changes to the operation of the transport devices and/or container treatment machine arranged upstream of the machine becoming necessary.
(15) However, if a change in the operating parameters of the direct printing machine occurs, in particular a reduction in the container throughput of the direct printing machine, then this can inadvertently lead to an accumulation of containers due to the high transport speeds of the containers in conventional container treatment systems (several 1000 containers per hour), which may result in damage to the containers or other negative influences, such as an excessively long dwell time of the containers between two successive treatment steps (which typically have to be carried out in a narrowly limited time window).
(16) According to the invention, system control device 180 is therefore configured such that it can control the operation of at least container treatment machines 103 and 104 and possibly transport devices 134 and 135 upstream of direct printing machine 105 in region 120 in dependence of the container throughput of the direct printing machine. This means in particular that, if the container throughput of the direct printing machine is reduced (planned or unplanned), then the container throughput of the container treatment machines arranged upstream of the direct printing machine is also reduced. The container throughput is basically understood to mean the number of containers treated in the individual container treatment machines per time interval (typically the number of containers per hour). The container throughput of a given container treatment machine can be reduced in a number of ways.
(17) If it is essential for the treatment of the container how long it remains in the respective container treatment machine (time-critical treatment), then the container throughput of such a container treatment machine can be reduced by introducing containers with a larger spacing from one another into the respective container treatment machine. As a result, fewer containers in total are treated in the container treatment machine during the same time interval, while the dwell time of the containers in the container treatment machine and therefore also the treatment time can remain the same. At the same time, the container throughput of such a container treatment machine can also be increased by supplying containers with a smaller spacing. Such container treatment machines, in which the dwell time of the containers in the container treatment machine or the treatment time of the containers in the relevant container treatment machine must remain constant, are called time-critical container treatment machines or time-critical container treatment.
(18) Other container treatment machines, in which the dwell time of the containers and/or the treatment time of the containers is not relevant for the outcome of the treatment, are referred to as non-time-critical container treatment machines or non-time-critical container treatment. This includes, for example, cooling the containers in a cooling machine or a cooling tunnel. The container treatment is there uncritical at least in that a longer dwell time than the minimum cooling period is harmless, since the container then only remains at a constant temperature. In such a case, the transport speed of the containers through the respective non-time-critical container treatment machine can be increased or decreased, depending on whether the container throughput of the direct printing machine increases or decreases. The container throughput can then be controlled by adjusting the transport speed.
(19) Alternatively or additionally, buffer regions can also be provided either in the individual container treatment machines and/or in the transport devices at 123, 134 and 145, in which containers can be buffered (preferably without touching each other or experiencing other adverse influences).
(20)
(21) A “planned” change in the container throughput of the direct printing machine is such a change (increase or decrease in the container throughput), the occurrence of which at a point in time t is known at an earlier point in time. This can be, for example, a changeover from a first type of print image to a second type of print image. The first type of print image can have a given printing time that differs from the second type of print image. This difference in the printing times also changes the container throughput that can be obtained with the direct printing machine. For example, if the printing time required per container increases with this planned change, then the container throughput reduces accordingly.
(22) According to
(23) After the imminent change has been established in step 201, the system control device first determines a required lead time t′ in a step 202. The required lead time t′ is ultimately a time that is required in order to process the containers in the direct printing machine that are still processed in the container treatment machines according to the old throughput (before the imminent change). Lead time t′ results from the number of containers still present between the last container treatment machine arranged upstream of the direct printing machine and the direct printing machine and the container throughput of the direct printing machine prior to the change at time T. The number of these containers typically results from the capacity (e.g. of transport device 145) and is a known variable. This variable can be referred to as M. If the original throughput is designated as D, then the lead time t′ required in each case results from t′=M/D. Once this lead time has been determined, system control device 180 can use this to calculate the point in time t at which at least the container throughput of the container treatment machine arranged directly upstream of the direct printing machine must be reduced. This point in time results from t=T−t′.
(24) It is understood that this time can be calculated in a corresponding manner for container treatment machines arranged further upstream. In this case, the number of containers remaining between the respective container treatment machine and the direct printing machine is typically determined by the aforementioned variable M and the number M.sub.2 of further containers disposed between the first container treatment machine arranged upstream of the direct printing machine and the respective container treatment machine. The required lead time t.sub.2 there results from (M+M.sub.2)/D, since the container throughput of all container treatment machines with the previous operation (prior to the change at time T) is equal to the throughput of the direct printing machine.
(25) The lead times for all container treatment machines upstream of the direct printing machine can be determined in this manner, which must be adhered to in order to change the throughput throughout and without accumulation of containers. This results from
(26)
where i indicates the container treatment machine for which the respective lead time is to be calculated. It is counted starting with the first container treatment machine i=1 arranged upstream of the direct printing machine and is increased by 1 with each container treatment machine arranged upstream.
(27) In the next step 203, the system control then controls the throughput of the respective container treatment machine at a suitable time t=T−t′ (corresponding to T−t.sub.i for each of the container treatment machines) For the case presently described in which the throughput of the direct printing machine reduces, this means quasi a reduction in the throughput of the respective container treatment machine from the original throughput D to the new throughput D′.
(28) The system control device subsequently controls the throughput of the direct printing machine when time T occurs (reduces it to the desired value), so that the throughput of the direct printing machine is reduced accordingly simultaneously with the arrival of the first container to be treated according to the new at the direct printing machine.
(29) Buffer regions can be omitted with these configurations.
(30) If the change in the container throughput of the direct printing machine is an increase in the container throughput, then it must also be ensured that the container treatment machines arranged upstream of the direct printing machine produce an increased container throughput at the same times. The control method by the system control device, as described in
(31)
(32)
(33) In first step 311 according to
(34) The system control device can use this to determine in step 312 how the throughput of the direct printing machine has now changed. If a printing module fails, it will usually decrease, for example, to a value which corresponds to the quotient of the number of printing modules still available and the total number of printing modules.
(35) On the basis of this information, the system control device now knows the new container throughput at which the non-time-critical container treatment machine must output containers. It then controls the non-time-critical container treatment machine in step 313 in such a way that its container throughput (in this case the output of the containers in the direction of the direct printing machine) is reduced to the new throughput of the direct printing machine. This can be achieved, for example, by reducing the transport speed of the containers in the non-time-critical container treatment machine. Since an increased dwell time in the non-time-critical container treatment machine is not critical for the quality of the print images to be applied to the containers, this does not result in any disadvantage for the subsequent printing.
(36) This can be explained using the example of a cooling tunnel which is typically arranged upstream of any possible pre-treatment machines.
(37) Containers are fed to the cooling tunnel by way of a separation (for example container treatment machine 102 shown schematically in
(38) In the cooling tunnel itself, the transport speed of the containers can then be reduced such that the spacing between the containers within the cooling tunnel remains constant (i.e. corresponds exactly to the spacing that was also provided for the original container throughput of the direct printing machine was) despite the supply of groups of containers being stopped due to the separation. This reduces the number of containers that leave the cooling tunnel at the end per unit time and therefore the container throughput, while their spacing from one another and therefore also the cooling outcome remains constant. This then corresponds to step 313 in
(39) This configuration also provides the advantage that the speed of the conveyor belt or, more generally, of the transportation through the cooling tunnel can be increased immediately when the container throughput of the direct printing machine is increased again, but the spacing between the containers still corresponds to that of the original container throughput, which ensures the further treatment of the containers and in particular printing onto the containers in the direct printing machine also according to the original throughput without gaps in the container flow arising.
(40)
(41)
(42) Since the dwell time of the containers in the time-critical container treatment machine cannot be increased, the system control device, however, controls the time-critical container treatment machine in step 323 such that the spacing between the containers in the container treatment machine is increased, namely according to the reduction in throughput. It then is true that the new spacing l′ of the containers results from the original spacing l at the original throughput D from l′=l*D/D′, where D′ is the now reduced throughput.
(43) It is understood that the increase in the spacing entails that the number of containers which is supplied to the time-critical container treatment machine per unit time must also decrease. Otherwise, container accumulation occurs upstream. This can be achieved, for example, in that the throughput of a non-time-critical container treatment machine arranged upstream of the time-critical container treatment machine is reduced accordingly (as was described in
(44) Alternatively or additionally, it can also be provided that buffer regions associated with individual container treatment machines or transport devices are filled with containers.
(45) It can also be ensured by using buffer regions that the required increased throughput of containers can be quickly restored without the direct printing machine running idle when the container throughput is subsequently increased in the direct printing machine (for example after replacing or repairing the damaged printing module). Where the excess of containers per unit time possibly arising as long as the throughput of the entire container treatment system has not yet been reduced to the new throughput of the direct printing machine results from H=D−D′. If time t that is necessary to reduce the total throughput of the container treatment system according to the above embodiments is known, then the required buffer capacity for containers in the buffer regions can be determined from this time t by way of H*t=P (P corresponds to the total number of bufferable containers). Alternatively or additionally, however, this capacity P can also be determined such that it is sufficient for a predicted downtime t.
(46) During the construction and planning of the container treatment system, it is possible, for example, to test or simulate how long the maximum downtimes are in the event of certain malfunctions. This gives rise to a number of downtimes, the largest of which can be selected as the basis for determining the buffer capacity, so that all possible downtimes (for example, of one or more printing modules) can be absorbed in all events by these buffer regions.
(47) While not explicitly stated above, it is nevertheless provided according to the invention that the methods described can be applied to every conceivable transportation and every conceivable combination of containers. In particular, the methods described, for example, the embodiments described in