Azeotropic compositions of HFO-1234YF and hydrocarbons
11781051 · 2023-10-10
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C09K5/042
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
Refrigerant compositions including 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and at least one of ethane (R-170) or propane (R-290) which exhibit near-azeotropic or azeotrope-like behavior. The refrigerant compositions exhibit a low global warming potential (GWP) and are non-ozone depleting. The refrigerant compositions are useful as a heating or cooling fluids in a variety of heating or cooling systems including heat pumps and other heating and cooling loops, in, for example, the automotive industry.
Claims
1. A refrigerant composition comprising: a refrigerant component, a stabilizer component, and an optional lubricating component, wherein said refrigerant component consists of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and one of ethane (R-170) in an amount of up to 36.5 weight percent or propane (R-290) in an amount of up to 15 weight percent, said stabilizer component comprises greater than 0 and up to 1 wt. % of an HFO terpene stabilizer selected from the group consisting of d-limonene, alpha-pinene and beta-pinene, and said optional lubricating component comprises at least one polyol ester (POE), wherein the composition is near-azeotropic over a temperature range between −30° C. to 40° C. with a glide of less than about 0.75 K at temperature of 40° C., soluble in a lubricant at temperatures over the range extending between about −35° C. and about 100° C., and having an ASHRAE 34 Class 2 to 2L rating.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the propane (R-290) is present in an amount of from 1 weight percent up to 15 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the amount of propane (R-290) is from 1 to 10 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the refrigerant composition is a heat pump fluid.
5. The composition of claim 3, wherein the amount of propane (R-290) is from 1 to 5 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the refrigerant composition has a heat capacity between 2% and 22% greater than a heat capacity of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) alone.
7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the refrigerant composition has a GWP less than 10 and an ODP of 0.
8. The composition of claim 7, wherein the refrigerant composition has a GWP of less than 5.
9. The composition of claim 1 wherein the refrigerant composition has a temperature glide of less than 0.35 Kelvin (K) at temperature of −30° C. up to 10° C.
10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the refrigerant components are 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and ethane (R-170) and.
11. The composition of claim 10, wherein the ethane (R-170) is present in an amount up to 10 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
12. The composition of claim 11, wherein the ethane (R-170) is present in an amount of from 1 to 7 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
13. The composition of claim 12, wherein the ethane (R-170) is present in an amount up to 5 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
14. The composition of claim 13, wherein the ethane (R-170) is present in an amount up to 1 weight percent based on the total refrigerant composition.
15. The composition of claim 1, wherein the heat capacity of the refrigerant composition is between 5% and 70% greater than the heat capacity of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) alone.
16. The composition of claim 1, wherein the heat capacity of the refrigerant composition is between 5% and 54% greater than the heat capacity of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) alone.
17. The composition of claim 1, comprising a,-GWP less than 10.
18. The composition of claim 1, wherein the refrigerant composition has a temperature glide of less than 3 Kelvin (K) at temperature of −30° C. up to 10° C.
19. The composition of claim 1: wherein a ratio of a heat capacity of the refrigerant composition to a heat capacity of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) is between 1.05 and 1.50 at the same temperature and pressure.
20. A refrigerant composition comprising: a refrigerant component consisting of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane (R-290) and a stabilizer component comprising at least one terpene in an amount between greater than 0.1 to 1 weight percent to stabilize the HFO-1234yf, wherein the propane (R-290) is present in an amount between 0.1 to 15 weight percent, based on the total refrigerant composition, and the composition has an HOC of <19 KJ/kg.
21. A refrigerant composition comprising: a refrigerant component consisting of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), propane (R-290); and a stabilizer component selected from one of d-limonene, alpha-pinene and beta-pinene, wherein the propane (R-290) is present in an amount between 0.1 to 22 weight percent, based on the total refrigerant composition, and the refrigerant composition has an HOC of <19 KJ/kg and an ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 class 2L flammability rating.
22. The composition of claim 21, wherein the 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane (R-290) refrigerant composition has a heat capacity between 2% and 22% greater than the heat capacity of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) alone.
23. The composition of claim 21, wherein the refrigerant composition has a GWP of less than 10 and an ODP of 0.
24. The composition of claim 23, wherein the GWP of the refrigerant composition is less than 5.
25. A heating system or cooling system or reversible cooling system or reversible heating system or a heat pump system with a circulating loop operably connected to and fluidly communicating with, in a serial arrangement: a condenser; an evaporator; and a compressor, the system further comprising each of the condenser, evaporator and compressor, the refrigerant composition of claim 1 being circulated through each of the condenser, evaporator and compressor.
26. The heating or cooling system of claim 25: wherein the system is an air conditioner for an automotive system.
27. The heating or cooling system of claim 25: wherein the system is an air conditioner for a stationary cooling system.
28. The heating or cooling system of claim 25: further comprising a 4-way valve.
29. The heating or cooling system of claim 25: wherein the system is a heat pump for an automotive system.
30. The refrigeration system of claim 25: wherein the system is heat pump for a stationary heating or cooling system.
31. The refrigeration system of claim 30: wherein a temperature glide is less than 1 Kelvin (K).
32. A method comprising circulating the refrigerant composition of claim 1 in a heat pump system, a reversible cooling loop system or an independent heating system or an independent cooling system.
33. A method comprising circulating the refrigerant composition of claim 1 in hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), mild hybrids electric vehicles (MHEV), plug-in hybrids electric vehicles (PHEV), or electric vehicle (EV) heat pump systems.
34. A method comprising circulating the refrigerant composition of claim 1 in hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), mild hybrids electric vehicles (MHEV), plug-in hybrids electric vehicles (PHEV), or electric vehicle (EV) heat pump systems.
35. A method comprising circulating the refrigerant composition of claim 1 in an HEV, MHEV, PHEV, or EV heat pump system in combination with a vehicle electrical system.
36. A method of charging a refrigerant composition to an automotive system comprising: providing the composition of claim 1 to an automotive heating or cooling system.
37. A method for servicing an existing refrigerant composition of at on-site automotive recovery, recycle, recharge equipment comprising providing the composition of claim 1 to the equipment.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Definitions
(9) As used herein, the term heat transfer composition means a composition used to carry heat from a heat source to a heat sink.
(10) A heat source is defined as any space, location, object or body from which it is desirable to add, transfer, move or remove heat. Example of a heat source in this embodiment is the vehicle passenger compartment requiring air conditioning.
(11) A heat sink is defined as any space, location, object or body capable of absorbing heat. An example of a heat sink in this embodiment is the vehicle passenger compartment requiring heating.
(12) A heat transfer system is the system (or apparatus) used to produce a heating or cooling effect in a particular location. A heat transfer system in this invention implies the reversible heating or cooling system which provides heating or cooling of the passenger cabin. Sometimes this system is called a heat pump system, reversible heating loop, or reversible cooling loop.
(13) A heat transfer fluid comprises at least one refrigerant and at least one member selected from the group consisting of lubricants, stabilizers and flame suppressants.
(14) Refrigeration capacity (also referred to as cooling or heating capacity, depending on which is the preferred requirement for the system) is a term which defines the change in enthalpy of a refrigerant in an evaporator per kilogram of refrigerant circulated, or the heat removed by the refrigerant in the evaporator per unit volume of refrigerant vapor exiting the evaporator (volumetric capacity). The refrigeration capacity is a measure of the ability of a refrigerant or heat transfer fluid composition to produce cooling or heating Therefore, the higher the capacity, the greater the cooling or heating that is produced. Cooling rate refers to the heat removed by the refrigerant in the evaporator per unit time. Heating rate refers to the heat removed by the refrigerant in the evaporator per unit time.
(15) Coefficient of performance (COP) is the amount of heat removed divided by the required energy input to operate the cycle. The higher the COP, the higher is the energy efficiency of the refrigerant or heat transfer fluid. COP is directly related to the energy efficiency ratio (EER) that is the efficiency rating for refrigeration or air conditioning equipment at a specific set of internal and external temperatures.
(16) Subcooling refers to the reduction of the temperature of a liquid below that liquid's saturation point for a given pressure. The liquid saturation point is the temperature at which the vapor is completely condensed to a liquid. Subcooling continues to cool the liquid to a lower temperature liquid at the given pressure. By cooling a liquid below the saturation temperature (or bubble point temperature), the net refrigeration capacity can be increased. Subcooling thereby improves refrigeration capacity and energy efficiency of a system. The subcool amount is the amount of cooling below the saturation temperature (in degrees).
(17) Superheating refers to the increase of the temperature of a vapor above that vapor's saturation point for a given pressure. The vapor saturation point is the temperature at which the liquid is completely evaporated to a vapor. Superheating continues to heat the vapor to a higher temperature vapor at a given pressure. By heating the vapor above the saturation temperature (or dew point temperature), the net refrigeration capacity can be increased. Superheating thereby improves refrigeration capacity and energy efficiency of a system. The superheat amount is the amount of heating above the saturation temperature (in degrees).
(18) Temperature glide (sometimes referred to simply as “glide”) is the absolute value of the difference between the starting and ending temperatures of a phase-change process by a refrigerant within a heat exchanger (evaporator or condenser) of a refrigerant system, exclusive of any subcooling or superheating. This term may be used to describe condensation or evaporation of a near azeotrope or non-azeotropic composition. When referring to the temperature glide of an air conditioning or heat pump system, it is common to provide the average temperature glide being the average of the temperature glide in the evaporator and the temperature glide in the condenser. Glide is applicable to blend refrigerants, i.e. refrigerants that are composed of at least 2 components.
(19) As used herein, the term low glide shall be understood as less than 3 Kelvin (K) over the operating range of interest. In some embodiments, the glide may be than 2.5 K over operating range of interest or even less than 0.75 K over operating range of interest.
(20) By azeotropic composition is meant a constant-boiling mixture of two or more substances that behave as a single substance. One way to characterize an azeotropic composition is that the vapor produced by partial evaporation or distillation of the liquid has the same composition as the liquid from which it is evaporated or distilled, i.e., the mixture distills/refluxes without compositional change. Constant-boiling compositions are characterized as azeotropic because they exhibit either a maximum or minimum boiling point, as compared with that of the non-azeotropic mixture of the same compounds. An azeotropic composition will not fractionate within an air conditioning or heating system during operation. Additionally, an azeotropic composition will not fractionate upon leakage from an air conditioning or heating system.
(21) As used herein, the terms “near-azeotropic composition” shall be understood to mean a composition wherein the difference between the bubble point pressure (“BP”) and dew point pressure (“DP”) of the composition at a particular temperature is less than or equal to 5 percent based upon the bubble point pressure, i.e., [(BP−DP)/BP]×100≤5.
(22) As used herein, the term “azeotrope-like composition” shall be understood to mean a composition wherein the difference between the bubble point pressure (“BP”) and dew point pressure (“DP”) of the composition at a particular temperature is less than or equal to 3 percent based upon the bubble point pressure, i.e., [(BP−DP)/BP]×100≤3.
(23) As used herein, the term “first near-azeotropic low HFO-1234yf composition (NAL1)” shall be understood to mean the lowest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting near-azeotropic behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(24) As used herein, the term “first near-azeotropic high HFO-1234yf composition (NAH1)” shall be understood to mean the highest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting near-azeotropic behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(25) As used herein, the term “first azeotrope-like low HFO-1234yf composition (ALL1)” shall be understood to mean the lowest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting azeotrope-like behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(26) As used herein, the term “first azeotrope-like high HFO-1234yf composition (ALH1)” shall be understood to mean the highest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting azeotrope-like behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(27) As used herein, the term “second near-azeotropic low HFO-1234yf composition (NAL2)” shall be understood to mean the lowest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting near-azeotropic behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(28) As used herein, the term “second near-azeotropic high HFO-1234yf composition (NAH2)” shall be understood to mean the highest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting near-azeotropic behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(29) As used herein, the term “second azeotrope-like low HFO-1234yf composition (ALL2)” shall be understood to mean the lowest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting azeotrope-like behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(30) As used herein, the term “second azeotrope-like high HFO-1234yf composition (ALH2)” shall be understood to mean the highest concentration of HFO-1234yf of a compositional range exhibiting azeotrope-like behavior of an HFO-1234yf/propane mixture or HFO-1234yf/ethane mixture.
(31) As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a composition, process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such composition, process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
(32) The transitional phrase “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified. If in the claim such would close the claim to the inclusion of materials other than those recited except for impurities ordinarily associated therewith. When the phrase “consists of” appears in a clause of the body of a claim, rather than immediately following the preamble, it limits only the element set forth in that clause; other elements are not excluded from the claim as a whole.
(33) The transitional phrase “consisting essentially of” is used to define a composition, method that includes materials, steps, features, components, or elements, in addition to those literally disclosed provided that these additional included materials, steps, features, components, or elements do materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the claimed invention, especially the mode of action to achieve the desired result of any of the processes of the present invention. The term ‘consisting essentially of’ occupies a middle ground between “comprising” and ‘consisting of’.
(34) Where applicants have defined an invention or a portion thereof with an open-ended term such as “comprising,” it should be readily understood that (unless otherwise stated) the description should be interpreted to also include such an invention using the terms “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of.”
(35) Also, use of “a” or “an” are employed to describe elements and components described herein. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the scope of the invention. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
(36) Refrigerant Blend (Class A2, GWP<10 and 0 ODP)
(37) Global warming potential (GWP) is an index for estimating relative global warming contribution due to atmospheric emission of a kilogram of a particular greenhouse gas compared to emission of a kilogram of carbon dioxide. GWP can be calculated for different time horizons showing the effect of atmospheric lifetime for a given gas. The GWP for the 100-year time horizon is commonly the value referenced in the industry and shall be used herein. For fluid mixtures or refrigerant mixtures, a weighted average can be calculated based on the individual GWPs for each component. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPCC) provides vetted values for refrigerant GWPs in official assessment reports (ARs.) The fourth assessment report is denoted as AR4 and the fifth assessment report is denoted as AR5. Regulating bodes are currently using AR4 for official legislating purposes.
(38) Ozone-depletion potential (ODP) is a number that refers to the amount of ozone depletion caused by a substance. The ODP is the ratio of the impact on ozone of a chemical compared to the impact of a similar mass of R-11 or fluorotrichloromethane. R-11 is a type of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and as such has chlorine in it which contributes to ozone depletion. Furthermore, the ODP of CFC-11 is defined to be 1.0. Other CFCs and hydrofluorochlorocarbons (HCFCs) have ODPs that range from 0.01 to 1.0. Hydrocarbons (HC's) and the hydrofluoro-olefins (HFO's) described herein have zero ODP because they do not contain chlorine, bromine or iodine, species known to contribute to ozone breakdown and depletion. Hydrocarbons (HC's) also do not have ODP as they by definition also do not contain chlorine, bromine or iodine.
(39) The refrigerant blend compositions comprise at least one hydrofluoro-olefin such as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and at least one hydrocarbon such as ethane (R-170) or propane (R-290).
(40) The unsaturated hydrofluoro-olefin (HFO) refrigerant components also have very low GWP, with all HFO components having GWP<10. The hydrocarbon (HC) refrigerant component includes ethane (R-170) or propane (R-290). The HC component also has a very low GWP. For example, ethane (R-170) has a GWP of 6 and propane (R-290) has a GWP of 3.
(41) Therefore, the final blends have 0 ODP and ultra-low GWP, or GWP<10. Table 1, shown below, is a summary table showing type, ODP and GWP per the 4.sup.th and the 5.sup.th assessment conducted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPCC) for 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), ethane (R-170), propane (R-290), and various combinations thereof.
(42) For the blend, GWP may be calculated as a weighted average of the individual GWP values in the blend, taking into account the amount (e.g., weight %) of each ingredient (1-n) in the blend, as shown in Equation (1) below.
GWP Blend=Amount1(GWP of component 1)+Amount2(GWP component 2)+Amount n(GWP of component n). Equation (1):
(43) Resultant GWP for several blends of interest for HFO-1234yf and R-170 are noted below. Blends with R-170 were limited to 36.5 wt % so that the resultant blend would meet the ASHRAE class 2 flammability requirements. Similarly, resultant GWP for several blends of interest for HFO-1234yf and R-290 are also noted below. Blends with R-290 were limited to 22 wt % so that the resultant blend would meet the ASHRAE class 2 flammability requirements. Due to the ultra-low GWPs of both HFO-1234yf and R-170, blends which contain up to 36.5 wt % of R-170 will have final GWP less than 10, and even more preferably less than 5 based on IPCC AR4. Similarly, due to the ultra-low GWPs of both HFO-1234yf and R-190 which contains R-290 up to 22 wt % will have final GWP less than 10 and even more preferably less than 5 and even less than 4 based on IPCC AR4.
(44) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Refrigerant GWP AR4 GWP AR5 Refrigerant Type ODP (IPCC) (IPCC) R-12 CFC 1 10900 10200 R-134a HFC 0 1430 1300 R-1234yf HFO 0 4 1 R-170 (ethane) HC 0 6 6 R-1234yf/R-170 HFO/HC 0 4.0 1.1 (99 wt %/1 wt %) R-1234yf/R-170 HFO/HC 0 4.1 1.3 (95 wt %/5 wt %) R-1234yf/R-170 HFO/HC 0 4.2 1.5 (90 wt %/10 wt %) R-1234yf/R-170 HFO/HC 0 4.7 2.8 (63.5 wt %/36.5 wt %) R-12 CFC 1 10900 10200 R-134a HFC 0 1430 1300 R-1234yf HFO 0 4 1 R-290 HC 0 3 3 R-1234yf/R-290 HFO/HC 0 4.0 1.0 (99 wt %/1 wt %) R-1234yf/R-290 HFO/HC 0 4.0 1.1 (95 wt %/5 wt %) R-1234yf/R-290 HFO/HC 0 3.9 1.2 (90 wt %/10 wt %) R-1234yf/R-290 HFO/HC 0 3.8 1.4 (78 wt %/22 wt %)
Refrigerant Lubricant
(45) The refrigerant or heat transfer compositions of the present invention can be mixed with a lubricant and used as a “complete working fluid composition” of the present invention. The refrigerant composition of the present invention containing the heat transfer or working fluid of the present invention and the lubricant may contain publicly known additives such as a stabilizer, a leakage detection material, and other beneficial additives. It is also possible for the lubricant to impact the flammability level of the resulting compound.
(46) The lubricant chosen for this composition preferably has sufficient solubility in the vehicle's A/C refrigerant to ensure that the lubricant can return to the compressor from the evaporator. Furthermore, the lubricant preferably has a relatively low viscosity at low temperatures so that the lubricant is able to pass through the cold evaporator. In one preferred embodiment, the lubricant and A/C refrigerant are miscible over a broad range of temperatures.
(47) Preferred lubricants may be one or more polyol ester type lubricants. (POEs). Polyol ester as used herein include compounds containing an ester of a diol or a polyol having from about 3 to 20 hydroxyl groups and a fatty acid having from about 1 to 24 carbon atoms is preferably used as the polyol. An ester which can be used as the base oil. (EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION published in accordance with Art. 153(4) EP 2 727 980 A1, which is hereby incorporated by reference). Here, examples of the diol include ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, propylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,2-butanediol, 2-methyl-1,3-propanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, neopentyl glycol, 1,6-hexanediol, 2-ethyl-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol, 1,7-heptanediol, 2-methyl-2-propyl-1,3-propanediol, 2,2-diethyl-1,3-propanediol, 1,8-octanediol, 1,9-nonanediol, 1,10-decanediol, 1,11-undecanediol, 1,12-dodecanediol, and the like.
(48) Examples of the above-described polyol include a polyhydric alcohol such as trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, trimethylolbutane, di(trimethylolpropane), tri(trimethylolpropane), pentaerythritol, di(pentaerythritol), tri(pentaerythritol), glycerin, polyglycerin (dimer to eicosamer of glycerin), 1,3,5-pentanetriol, sorbitol, sorbitan, a sorbitol-glycerin condensate, adonitol, arabitol, xylitol, mannitol, etc.; a saccharide such as xylose, arabinose, ribose, rhamnose, glucose, fructose, galactose, mannose, sorbose, cellobiose, maltose, isomaltose, trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, gentianose, melezitose, etc.; partially etherified products and methyl glucosides thereof; and the like. Among these, a hindered alcohol such as neopentyl glycol, trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, trimethylolbutane, di(trimethylolpropane), tri(trimethylolpropane), pentaerythritol, di(pentaerythritol), or tri(pentaerythritol) is preferable as the polyol.
(49) Though the fatty acid is not particularly limited on its carbon number, in general, a fatty acid having from 1 to 24 carbon atoms is used. In the fatty acid having from 1 to 24 carbon atoms, a fatty acid having 3 or more carbon atoms is preferable, a fatty acid having 4 or more carbon atoms is more preferable, a fatty acid having 5 or more carbon atoms is still more preferable, and a fatty acid having 10 or more carbon atoms is the most preferable from the standpoint of lubricating properties. In addition, a fatty acid having not more than 18 carbon atoms is preferable, a fatty acid having not more than 12 carbon atoms is more preferable, and a fatty acid having not more than 9 carbon atoms is still more preferable from the standpoint of compatibility with the refrigerant.
(50) In addition, the fatty acid may be either of a linear fatty acid and a branched fatty acid, and the fatty acid is preferably a linear fatty acid from the standpoint of lubricating properties, whereas it is preferably a branched fatty acid from the standpoint of hydrolysis stability. Furthermore, the fatty acid may be either of a saturated fatty acid and an unsaturated fatty acid. Specifically, examples of the above-described fatty acid include a linear or branched fatty acid such as pentanoic acid, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, nonanoic acid, decanoic acid, undecanoic acid, dodecanoic acid, tridecanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, hexadecanoic acid, heptadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, nonadecanoic acid, icosanoic acid, oleic acid, etc.; a so-called neo acid in which a carboxylic group is attached to a quaternary carbon atom; and the like. More specifically, preferred examples thereof include valeric acid (n-pentanoic acid), caproic acid (n-hexanoicacid), enanthic acid (n-heptanoic acid), caprylic acid (n-octanoic acid), pelargonic acid (n-nonanoic acid), capric acid (n-decanoic acid), oleic acid (cis-9-octadecenoic acid), isopentanoic acid (3-methylbutanoic acid), 2-methylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylpentanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid, 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoic acid, and the like. Incidentally, the polyol ester maybe a partial ester in which the hydroxyl groups of the polyol remain without being fully esterified; a complete ester in which all of the hydroxyl groups are esterified; or a mixture of a partial ester and a complete ester, with a complete ester being preferable.
(51) In the polyol ester, an ester of a hindered alcohol such as neopentyl glycol, trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, trimethylolbutane, di(trimethylolpropane), tri(trimethylolpropane), pentaerythritol, di(pentaerythritol), tri(pentaerythritol), etc. is more preferable, with an ester of neopentyl glycol, trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, trimethylolbutane, or pentaerythritol being still more preferable, from the standpoint of more excellent hydrolysis stability; and an ester of pentaerythritol is the most preferable from the standpoint of especially excellent compatibility with the refrigerant and hydrolysis stability.
(52) Preferred specific examples of the polyol ester include a diester of neopentyl glycol with one kind or two or more kinds of fatty acids selected from valeric acid, caproic acid, enanthic acid, caprylic acid, pelargonic acid, capric acid, oleic acid, isopentanoic acid, 2-methylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylpentanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoic acid; a triester of trimethylolethane with one kind or two or more kinds of fatty acids selected from valeric acid, caproic acid, enanthic acid, caprylic acid, pelargonic acid, capric acid, oleic acid, isopentanoic acid, 2-methylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylpentanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoic acid; a triester of trimethylolpropane with one kind or two or more kinds of fatty acids selected from valeric acid, caproic acid, enanthic acid, caprylic acid, pelargonic acid, capric acid, oleic acid, isopentanoic acid, 2-methylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylpentanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoic acid; a triester of trimethylolbutane with one kind or two or more kinds of fatty acids selected from valeric acid, caproic acid, enanthic acid, caprylic acid, pelargonic acid, capric acid, oleic acid, isopentanoic acid, 2-methylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylpentanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoic acid; and a tetraester of pentaerythritol with one kind or two or more kinds of fatty acids selected from valeric acid, caproic acid, enanthic acid, caprylic acid, pelargonic acid, capric acid, oleic acid, isopentanoic acid, 2-methylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylpentanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoic acid. Incidentally, the ester with two or more kinds of fatty acids may be a mixture of two or more kinds of esters of one kind of a fatty acid and a polyol, and an ester of a mixed fatty acid of two or more kinds thereof and a polyol, particularly an ester of a mixed fatty acid and a polyol is excellent in low-temperature properties and compatibility with the refrigerant.
(53) In a preferred embodiment, the lubricant is soluble in the refrigerant at temperatures between about −35° C. and about 100° C., and more preferably in the range of about −30° C. and about 40° C., and even more specifically between −25° C. and 40° C. In another embodiment, attempting to maintain the lubricant in the compressor is not a priority and thus high temperature insolubility is not preferred.
(54) The lubricant used for electrified automotive air-conditioning application may have a kinematic viscosity (measured at 40° C., according to ASTM D445) between 75-110 cSt, and ideally about 80 cSt-100 cSt and most specifically, between 85 cst-95 cSt. However, not wanting to limit the invention, it should be noted that other lubricant viscosities may be used depending on the needs of the electrified vehicle A/C compressor.
(55) To suppress the hydrolysis of the lubricating oil, it is necessary to control the moisture concentration in the heating/cooling system for electric type vehicles. Therefore, the lubricant in this embodiment needs to have low moisture, typically less than 100 ppm by weight.
(56) Refrigerant Stabilizers
(57) HFO type refrigerants, due to the presence of a double bond, may be subject to thermal instability and decompose under extreme use, handling or storage situations. Therefore, there may be advantages to adding stabilizers to HFO type refrigerants. Stabilizers may notably include nitromethane, ascorbic acid, terephthalic acid, azoles such as tolutriazole or benzotriazole, phenolic compounds such as tocopherol, hydroquinone, t-butyl hydroquinone, 2,6-di-tertbutyl-4-methylphenol, epoxides (possibly fluorated or perfluorated alkyl epoxides or alkenyl or aromatic epoxides) such as n-butyl glycidyl ether, hexanediol diglycidyl ether, allyl glycidyl ether, butylphenylglycidyl ether, terpenes, such as d-limonene or alpha and beta-pinene, phosphites, phosphates, phosphonates, thiols and lactones.
(58) Not wanting to be prescriptive, blends may or may not include stabilizers depending on the requirements of the system being used. If the refrigerant blend does include a stabilizer, it may include any amount from 0.01 weight percent up to 1 weight percent of any of the stabilizers listed above, but most preferably tocopherol, or d-limonene.
(59) Refrigerant Blend Flammability
(60) Flammability is a term used to mean the ability of a composition to ignite and/or propagate a flame. For refrigerants and other heat transfer compositions or working fluids, the lower flammability limit (“LFL”) is the minimum concentration of the heat transfer composition in air that is capable of propagating a flame through a homogeneous mixture of the composition and air under test conditions specified in ASTM (American Society of Testing and Materials) E681. The upper flammability limit (“UFL”) is the maximum concentration of the heat transfer composition in air that is capable of propagating a flame through a homogeneous mixture of the composition and air under the same test conditions.
(61) In order to be classified by ANSI/ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) as (class 1, no flame propagation), a refrigerant must meet the conditions of ASTM E681 as formulated in both the liquid and vapor phase as well as non-flammable in both the liquid and vapor phases that result during leakage scenarios.
(62) In order for a refrigerant to be classified by ANSI/ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) as low flammability (class 2L), the refrigerant: 1) exhibits flame propagation when tested at 140° F. (60° C.) and 14.7 psia (101.3 kPa), 2) has an LFL>0.0062 lb/ft.sup.3 (0.10 kg/m3), 3) a maximum burning velocity of ≤3.9 in./s (10 cm/s) when tested at 73.4° F. (23.0° C.) and 14.7 psia (101.3 kPa). and 4) has a heat of combustion<8169 Btu/lb (19,000 kJ/kg). 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) has an ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 class 2L flammability rating.
(63) In order for a refrigerant to be classified by ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34 class 2, the refrigerant 1) exhibits flame propagation when tested at 140° F. (60° C.) and 14.7 psia (101.3 kPa), 2) has an LFL>0.0062 lb/ft.sup.3 (0.10 kg/m.sup.3) and 3) has a heat of combustion<8169 Btu/lb (19,000 kJ/kg).
(64) In order for a refrigerant to be classified by ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 class 3, refrigerant 1) exhibits flame propagation when tested at 140° F. (60° C.) and 14.7 psia (101.3 kPa), 2) has an LFL<0.0062 lb/ft.sup.3 (0.10 kg/m.sup.3) or 3) has a heat of combustion>8169 Btu/lb (19,000 kJ/kg).
(65) When the HFO component and the HC components are blended together in the correct proportions, the resulting blend has class 2 flammability as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 and ISO 817. Class 2 flammability is inherently less flammable (i.e., lower energy release as exemplified by the Heat of Combustion or HOC value) than class 3 flammability and can be managed in automotive heating/cooling systems. ASHRAE Standard 34 provides a methodology to calculate the heat of combustion for refrigerant blends using a balanced stoichiometric equation based on the complete combustion of one mole of refrigerant with enough oxygen for a stoichiometric reaction.
(66) It can be seen from the table below that based on the heat of combustion calculation provided in ASHRAE Standard 34 section 6.1.3.6, it is possible to have from 0.1 wt % to 36.5 wt % of ethane combine with HFO-1234yf and still meet the heat of combustion requirements for ASHRAE class 2 flammability (HOC<19 KJ/kg.) Similarly, it is also possible combine from 0.1 wt % to 22 wt % of propane combined with HFO-1234yf and still meet the heat of combustion requirements for ASHRAE class 2 flammability (HOC<19 KJ/kg).
(67) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Heat of ASHRAE Std 34 Toxicity Class Combustion [HOC] Flammability Class per ASHRAE (KJ/kg) estimated or estimated 34 or estimated per ASHRAE Std 34 Flammability Class Refrigerants from TLV Method based on HOC R-1234yf A 10.7 2L R-170 (Ethane) A 46.9 3 R-290 (Propane) A 46.4 3 HFO-1234yf (99%)/Ethane (1%) A 11.2 2 HFO-1234yf (95%)/Ethane (5%) A 12.8 2 HFO-1234yf (90%)/Ethane (10%) A 14.8 2 HFO-1234yf (63.5%)/Ethane A 19.0 2 (36.5%) HFO-1234yf (99%)/Propane (1%) A 11.2 2 HFO-1234yf (95%)/Propane (5%) A 12.8 2 HFO-1234yf (90%)/Propane A 14.8 2 (10%) HFO-1234yf (78%)/Propane A 19.0 2 (22%)
(68) A blend comprising 95 wt % of R-1234yf and 5 wt % R-170 was tested per ASTM E681 and found to have LFL of 5 vol %. The resultant LFL meets the ASHRAE class 2 flammability requirements. See table 3 below.
(69) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Toxicity LFL Heat of ASHRAE Class per (vol %) Combustion [HOC] Std 34 ASHRAE 34 per (KJ/kg) estimated Flammability or estimated ASTM LFL per ASHRAE Std Class based Refrigerants from TLV E681 (kg/m3) 34 Method on LFL R-1234yf A 6.2 0.289 10.7 2L R-170 (Ethane) A 3.1 0.038 46.9 3 R-1234yf (95%)/ A 5.0 0.206 12.8 2 R-170 (Ethane (5%)) R-290 (Propane) A 2.1 0.038 46.4 3
(70) When the HFO component and the HC components are blended together in even more precise proportions, the resulting blend has class 2L flammability as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 and ISO 817. Class 2L flammability is inherently much less flammable (i.e., lower energy release as exemplified by the Heat of Combustion or HOC value) than class 3 flammability and can be managed in automotive heating/cooling systems.
(71) It is also possible to blend the HFO component and HC component and add a flame suppressant such that the resulting blend has class 2L flammability as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 and ISO 817. Class 2L flammability is inherently much less flammable (i.e., lower energy release as exemplified by the Heat of Combustion or HOC value) than class 3 flammability and can be managed in automotive heating/cooling systems. An example of this is adding CF3I or other known flame suppressant such that the refrigerant blend properties are not impacted and the resultant blend is class 2L flammable. It is even possible to add enough flame suppressant to reduce the flammability such the resultant blend is class 1 and does not exhibit flame propagation.
(72) The toxicity of these components has also been reviewed by WEEL or similar toxicological type committee and found to have toxicity values greater than 400 ppm and therefore classified by ANSI/ASHRAE standard 34 and ISO 817 as class A or low toxicity level.
(73) Compositions of the present invention azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over temperature ranges desirably employed in thermal management systems. Azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic compositions exhibit low temperature glide when used in thermal management systems, such as refrigeration or air conditioning systems. In some embodiments, the compositions exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties at both the desired evaporator and condenser operating temperatures.
(74) The compositions of the present invention may additionally improve the heating/cooling system performance. In some embodiments, a ratio of a heat capacity of the inventive compositions to a heat capacity of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) is between 1.05 and 1.50 at the same temperature and pressure.
(75) Mixtures of HFO-1234yf and propane may exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over one or more concentration ranges depending on the temperature and pressure. In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and propane may exhibit near-azeotropic properties over a range of concentrations from propane NAL1 to propane NAH1. In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and propane may exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over a range of concentrations from propane NAL2 to propane NAH2. In some embodiments, the propane NAL1 to propane NAH1 and propane NAL2 to propane NAH2 ranges overlap.
(76) It will also be understood that inventive compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic properties may possess HFO-1234yf concentrations as part of the HFO-1234yf/propane compositions between the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to propane NAL1 and the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to propane NAH1. Similarly, the compositions associated with propane NAL2, propane NAH2, and the compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic having HFO-1234yf concentrations between propane NAL2 and propane NAH2 may be as described above.
(77) In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and propane may exhibit azeotrope-like properties over a range of concentrations from propane ALL1 to propane ALH1. In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and propane may exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over a range of concentrations from propane ALL2 to propane ALH2. In some embodiments, the propane ALL1 to propane ALH1 and propane ALL2 to propane ALH2 ranges overlap.
(78) It will also be understood that inventive compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic properties may possess HFO-1234yf concentrations as part of the HFO-1234yf/propane compositions between the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to AAL1 and the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to AAH1. Similarly, the compositions associated with propane AAL2, propane AAH2, and the compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic having HFO-1234yf concentrations between propane AAL2 and propane AAH2 may be as described above.
(79) Mixtures of HFO-1234yf and ethane (R-170) may exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over one or more concentration ranges depending on the temperature and pressure. In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and ethane (R-170) may exhibit near-azeotropic properties over a range of concentrations from ethane NAL1 to ethane NAH1. In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and ethane (R-170) may exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over a range of concentrations from ethane NAL2 to ethane NAH2. In some embodiments, the ethane NAL1 to ethane NAH1 and ethane NAL2 to ethane NAH2 ranges do not overlap.
(80) It will also be understood that inventive compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic properties may possess HFO-1234yf concentrations as part of the HFO-1234yf/ethane (R-170) compositions between the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to ethane NAL1 and the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to ethane NAH1. Similarly, the compositions associated with ethane NAL2, ethane NAH2, and the compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic having HFO-1234yf concentrations between ethane NAL2 and ethane NAH2 may be as described above.
(81) In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and ethane (R-170) may exhibit azeotrope-like properties over a range of concentrations from ethane ALL1 to ethane ALH1. In some embodiments, a refrigerant composition of HFO-1234yf and ethane (R-170) may exhibit azeotrope-like and/or near-azeotropic properties over a range of concentrations from ethane ALL2 to ethane ALH2. In some embodiments, the ethane ALL1 to ethane ALH1 and ethane ALL2 to ethane ALH2 ranges do not overlap.
(82) It will also be understood that inventive compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic properties may possess HFO-1234yf concentrations as part of the HFO-1234yf/ethane (R-170) compositions between the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to ethane AAL1 and the HFO-1234yf concentration corresponding to ethane AAH1. Similarly, the compositions associated with ethane AAL2, ethane AAH2, and the compositions exhibiting near-azeotropic having HFO-1234yf concentrations between ethane AAL2 and ethane AAH2 may be as described above.
(83) One aspect of the invention is shown in
(84) The system is an azeotrope-like from a propane ALL1 (615) of 0 to a propane ALH1 (620) of about 67.8 weight percent R-1234yf and 100 to about 32.2 weight percent propane at a temperature of about 0° C. The system is also azeotrope-like from a propane ALL2 (630) of about 99.2 to a propane ALH2 (645) of 100 weight percent R-1234yf and about 0.8 to 0 weight percent propane at a temperature of about 0° C.
(85) Another aspect of the invention is shown in
(86) The system is azeotrope-like from a propane ALL1 (615) of 0 to a propane ALH1 (620) of about 73.7 weight percent R-1234yf and 100 to about 26.3 weight percent propane at a temperature of about 40° C. The system is also azeotrope-like from a propane ALL2 (630) of about 98.2 to a propane ALH2 (645) of 100 weight percent R-1234yf and about 1.8 to 0 weight percent propane at a temperature of about 40° C.
(87) In embodiments, the refrigerant blends include 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane (R-290). In some embodiments, the refrigerant blends may consist of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane (R-290). In some embodiments, the refrigerant blends may comprise blends ranging from 1 weight percent propane to 10 weight percent propane. More specifically, the blend may contain from 5 weight percent to 10 weight percent propane and even more specifically from 5 weight percent to 7 weight percent of propane.
(88) One aspect of the invention is shown in
(89) The system is an azeotrope-like from an ethane ALL1 (715) of 0 to an ethane ALH1 (720) of about 10 weight percent R-1234yf and 100 to about 90 weight percent ethane at a temperature of about 0° C. The system is also azeotrope-like from an ethane ALL2 (730) of about 99.9 to an ethane ALH2 (745) of 100 weight percent R-1234yf and about 0.1 to 0 weight percent ethane at a temperature of about 0° C.
(90) Another aspect of the invention is shown in
(91) The system is azeotrope-like from an ethane ALL1 (715) of 36 to an ethane ALH1 (720) of about 38.9 weight percent R-1234yf and about 64 to about 61.1 weight percent ethane at a temperature of about 40° C. The system is also azeotrope-like from an ethane ALL2 (730) of about 99.8 to an ethane ALH2 (745) of 100 weight percent R-1234yf and about 0.2 to 0 weight percent ethane at a temperature of about 40° C.
(92) While HFO-1234yf can be used as an air-conditioning refrigerant, it is limited in its ability to perform as a heat pump type fluid, i.e. in cooling and heating mode or in a reversible cycle system. Therefore, the refrigerants noted herein uniquely provide improved capacity over HFO-1234yf in the heating operating range, extend the lower heating range capability over HFO-1234yf to −30° C., have extremely low GWP and low to mild flammability, while also uniquely exhibiting low or nearly negligible glide. Hence these refrigerants are most useful in electrified vehicle applications, particularly HEV, PHEV, MHEV, EV and mass transport vehicles which require these properties over the lower end heating range. It should also be noted that any heat pump type fluid also needs to perform well in the air-conditioning range, i.e. up to 40° C., providing increased capacity versus HFO-1234yf. Therefore, the refrigerant blends noted herein perform well over a range of temperatures, particularly from −30° C. up to +40° C. and can provide heating and/or cooling depending upon which cycle they are being used in the heat pump system.
(93) In embodiments, the refrigerant blends include 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and ethane. In some embodiments, the refrigerant blends may consist of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and ethane. In some embodiments, the refrigerant blends may comprise near azeotropic, azeotrope-like, or azeotropic blends including 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and ethane.
(94) In other embodiments, the refrigerant blends include 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane. In some embodiments, the refrigerant blends may consist of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane. In some embodiments, the refrigerant blends may comprise near azeotropic, azeotrope-like, or azeotropic blends including 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and propane.
(95) The refrigerant blends may be used in a variety of heating and cooling systems. In the embodiment of
(96) In cooling mode, the refrigerant set in motion by the compressor 150 passes, via the valve 160, through the heat exchanger 120 which acts as a condenser, that is to say gives up heat energy to the outside, then through the pressure regulator 130 then through the heat exchanger 140 that is acting as an evaporator thus cooling the stream of air intended to be blown into the motor vehicle cabin interior.
(97) In heat pump mode, the direction of flow of the refrigerant is reversed using the valve 160. The heat exchanger 140 acts as a condenser while the heat exchanger 120 acts as an evaporator. The heat exchanger 140 can then be used to heat up the stream of air intended for the motor vehicle cabin.
(98) In the embodiment of
(99) The heat exchanger 280 may also be activated according to energy requirements, whether this is in refrigeration mode or in heat pump mode. Shut-off valves 290 can be installed on the branch 270 to activate or deactivate this branch.
(100) A stream of air conveyed by a fan passes through the heat exchanger 280. This same air stream may pass through another heat exchanger of the engine cooling circuit and also through other heat exchangers placed in the exhaust gas circuit, on the engine air inlet or on the battery in the case of hybrid motorcars.
(101) In the embodiment of
(102) In the embodiment of
(103) The heat exchangers 420 and 450 are of the air/refrigerant type and the heat exchangers 430 and 460 are of the liquid/refrigerant type. The way in which these heat exchangers work is the same as in the third embodiment depicted in
(104) The refrigerant blends may also be used to reduce the relative concentrations of gross contaminants from a refrigerant composition. In one embodiment, a first refrigerant composition including 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) and at least one of ethane (R-170) or propane (R-290) which does not exhibit near azeotropic behavior is blended with at least one of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), ethane (R-170) or propane (R-290) to form a second refrigerant composition. The addition of the at least one of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), ethane (R-170) or propane (R-290) reduces the relative concentrations of the gross contaminants resulting in the second refrigerant composition exhibiting near azeotropic behavior.
EXAMPLES
(105) Thermodynamic Modeling Comparison for the Heat Pump Systems
(106) Heating Mode: Ethane
(107) A thermodynamic modeling program, Thermocycle 3.0, was used to model the expected performance of the HFO-1234yf/Ethane blend compared to HFO-1234yf. Model conditions used for the heating mode are as follows, where heat exchanger #2 was varied in 10° C. increments:
(108) TABLE-US-00004 Heating Cycle Modeling Conditions Heat Exchanger #1- Inside Vehicle Cabin 50° C. Heat Exchange #2- Outside Air −30° C. to 10° C. (Ambient Air Temp) Return Gas Heated 10° C. Compressor Efficiency 70% Modeling results for HFO-1234yf/Ethane ranging from 1 wt % to 10 wt %.
(109) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Heat Exchanger #2 T = −30° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Inlet Disc Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Pres Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf −20 74.8 98.3 1299.7 13.2 831.6 100.0 2.18 100.0 R-1234yf/ −20 77.5 102.8 1390.2 13.5 877.8 105.6 2.18 100.0 1.09 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ −20 86.5 122.4 1736.4 14.2 1059.8 127.4 2.15 98.6 3.75 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ −20 95.0 150.1 2139.3 14.3 1284.5 154.5 2.11 96.8 4.77 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(110) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Heat Exchanger #2 = −20° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compessor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (C.) (C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (C) R-1234yf −10 71.2 149.9 1299.7 8.7 1204.9 100.0 2.53 100.0 R-1234yf/ −10 73.6 157.0 1390.2 8.9 1271.9 105.6 2.52 99.6 1.03 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ −10 81.6 187.9 1736.4 9.2 1534.9 127.4 2.48 98.0 3.46 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ −10 88.9 230.9 2139.3 9.3 1854.7 153.9 2.42 95.7 4.27 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(111) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 6 Heat Exchanger #2 T = −10° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compessor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 0 68.4 220.5 1299.7 5.9 1699.1 100.0 3.00 100.0 R-1234yf/ 0 70.6 231.4 1390.2 6.0 1794.3 105.6 2.99 99.7 0.96 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 0 77.5 278.1 1736.4 6.2 2165.7 127.5 2.93 97.7 3.12 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 0 83.7 342.4 2139.3 6.2 2609.5 153.6 2.85 95.0 3.71 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(112) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 7 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 0° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compessor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 66.2 314.2 1299.7 4.1 2342.3 100.0 3.68 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 68.1 330.3 1390.2 4.2 2475.2 105.7 3.65 99.2 0.87 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 74.0 399.2 1736.4 4.3 2990.7 127.7 3.56 96.7 2.73 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 79.2 492.3 2139.3 4.3 3593.5 153.4 3.47 94.3 3.10 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(113) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 8 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 10° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compessor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 20 64.5 435.5 1299.7 3.0 3168.1 100.0 4.70 100.0 R-1234yf/ 20 66.1 458.8 1390.2 3.0 3351.7 105.8 4.66 99.1 0.76 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 20 71.0 557.9 1736.4 3.1 4057.9 128.1 4.53 96.4 2.28 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 20 75.2 688.7 2139.3 3.1 4862.7 153.5 4.40 93.6 2.47 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(114) Modeling results show that blends of HFO-1234yf with R-170 from 1 wt % to 10 wt % provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf. At −20° C. and −30 C ambient temperatures, HFO-1234yf does not perform well. At −30° C., the compressor inlet pressure is sub-atmospheric (<101.3 kPa) and air would be pulled into the compressor (TABLE 4). Therefore, HFO-1234yf is limited for use as a heat pump fluid to −20 C without some sort system design. However, even 1 wt % R-170 (ethane) significantly improves the performance of the resultant blend with HFO-1234yf (99 wt %)/R-170 (1 wt %) being able to operate at temperatures down to −30 C. Therefore, the inventive blends of HFO-1234yf/R-170 extend the heating range by a delta of 10 degrees C.
(115) Blends of HFO-1234yf with R-170 (ethane) from 1 wt % to 10 wt % also provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf in terms of improved heating capacity. Modeling results show that even 1 wt % of R-170 has over 5% heat capacity improvement while up to 10% ethane can significantly improve the relative heat capacity up to 54%. The improved heating capacity of the inventive blends shows that the new fluids can easily be used to provide adequate heat to a passenger cabin. Additionally, the resultant inventive blends generally have a similar or reduced compressor discharge ratio versus neat HFO-2134yf over the heat pump operating range.
(116) Modeling shows that blends of HFO-1234yf and R-170 (ethane) from 1 wt % to 5 wt % have similar coefficient of performance (COP) or energy performance in the heating range of −30° C. to +10° C. Blends of HFO-1234yf and R-170 (ethane) from >5 wt % up to 10 wt % have adequate COP in the heating range.
(117) Additionally, blends which contain 1 to 10 wt % R-170 (ethane) also exhibit relatively low glide over the desired heating range, i.e., from −30° C. up to 10° C. However, since it is envisioned that servicing typically occurs in a garage service bay and the ambient would be on the order of 10° C. or greater, the R-170 blends have extremely favorable glide and can be serviced as near azeotropic blends.
(118) Therefore, the HFO-1234yf/R-170 refrigerant blends noted herein uniquely provide improved capacity 5% to 54% over HFO-1234yf in the heating operating range from −30° C. to +10° C., extend the lower heating range capability over HFO-1234yf by a delta of 10° C., have extremely low GWP (less than 10) and low to mild flammability (class 2 to class 2L), while also uniquely exhibiting low or nearly negligible temperature glide in the automotive servicing temperature zone of 10° C. or higher.
(119) While all blends of HFO-1234yf and R-170 would be desirable, the preferred blends with advantageous flammability (i.e. class 2 or class 2L) for a heat pump fluid are 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 63.5 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-170 to 36.5 wt % R-170, with more preferred blends being 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 90 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % to 10 wt % R-170 and most preferred blend being 99% HFO-1234yf to 93 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-170 to 7 wt % R-170.
(120) Heating Mode: Propane
(121) A thermodynamic modeling program, Thermocycle 3.0, was used to model the expected performance of the HFO-1234yf/Propane blend compared to HFO-1234yf. Model conditions used for the heating mode are as follows, where heat exchanger #2 was varied in 10 C increments:
(122) TABLE-US-00010 Heating Cycle Modeling Conditions Heat Exchanger #1- Inside Vehicle Cabin 50° C. Heat Exchange #2- Outside Air −30° C. to 10° C. (Ambient Air Temp) Return Gas Heated 10° C. Compressor Efficiency 70% Modeling results for HFO-1234yf/Propane ranging from 1 wt % to 10 wt %.
(123) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 9 Heat Exchanger #2 T = −30° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf −20 74.8 98.3 1299.7 13.2 831.6 100.0 2.18 100.0 R-1234yf/ −20 75.6 101.0 1337.3 13.2 852.0 102.4 2.17 99.5 0.27 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ −20 78.0 112.1 1468.0 13.1 929.2 111.7 2.14 98.2 0.74 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ −20 79.7 126.3 1596.2 12.6 1019.3 122.6 2.12 97.2 0.54 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(124) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 10 Heat Exchanger #2 T = −20° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf −10 71.2 149.9 1299.7 8.7 1204.9 100.0 2.53 100.0 R-1234yf/ −10 71.9 154.1 1337.3 8.7 1233.9 102.4 2.52 99.6 0.25 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ −10 73.9 170.9 1468.0 8.6 1342.4 111.4 2.48 98.0 0.63 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ −10 75.3 191.9 1596.2 8.3 1464.8 121.6 2.45 96.8 0.40 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(125) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 11 Heat Exchanger #2 T = −10° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 0 68.4 220.5 1299.7 5.9 1699.1 100.0 3.00 100.0 R-1234yf/ 0 69.0 226.7 1337.3 5.9 1739.5 102.4 2.99 99.7 0.22 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 0 70.7 251.2 1468.0 5.8 1888.0 111.1 2.95 98.3 0.52 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 0 71.9 281.0 1596.2 5.7 2049.3 120.6 2.91 97.0 0.27 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(126) TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 12 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 0° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 66.2 314.2 1299.7 4.1 2342.3 100.0 3.68 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 66.7 323.0 1337.3 4.1 2397.5 102.4 3.66 99.5 0.19 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 68.1 357.6 1468.0 4.1 2596.5 110.9 3.61 98.1 0.41 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 69.1 398.2 1596.2 4.0 2803.4 119.7 3.63 98.6 0.17 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(127) TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 13 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 10° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Heating Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 20 64.5 435.5 1299.7 3.0 3168.1 100.0 4.70 100.0 R-1234yf/ 20 64.9 447.8 1337.3 3.0 3242.6 102.3 4.68 99.6 0.15 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 20 66.1 495.1 1468.0 3.0 3504.5 110.6 4.61 98.1 0.31 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 20 66.8 548.7 1596.2 2.9 3763.9 118.8 4.56 97.0 0.08 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(128) Modeling results show that blends of HFO-1234yf with R-290 from 1 wt % to 10 wt % provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf. At −30° C. ambient temperatures, HFO-1234yf does not perform well. The compressor inlet pressure is sub-atmospheric (<101.3 kPa) and air would be pulled into the compressor (tables 4). Therefore, HFO-1234yf is limited for use as a heat pump fluid to −20° C. without some sort system design. However, even 1 wt % R-290 (propane) significantly improves the performance of the resultant blend with HFO-1234yf (99 wt %)/R-290 (1 wt %) being able to operate at temperatures down to −30° C. Therefore, the inventive blends of HFO-1234yf/R-290 extend the heating range by a delta of 10 degrees C.
(129) Blends of HFO-1234yf with R-290 (propane) from 1 wt % to 10 wt % also provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf in terms of improved heating capacity. Modeling results show that even 1 wt % of R-290 has over 2% heat capacity improvement while up to 10% propane can significantly improve the relative heat capacity up to 22%. The improved heating capacity of the inventive blends shows that the new fluids can easily be used to provide adequate heat to a passenger cabin. Additionally, the resultant inventive blends generally have a similar or reduced compressor discharge ratio versus neat HFO-2134yf over the heat pump operating range.
(130) Modeling shows that blends of HFO-1234yf and R-290 (propane) from 1 wt % to 5 wt % have similar COP or energy performance in the heating range of −30 C to +10 C. Blends of HFO-1234yf and R-290 (propane) from >5 wt % up to 10 wt % have adequate COP in the heating range.
(131) Additionally, blends which contain 1 to 10 wt % R-290 (propane) also exhibit negligible glide over the desired heating range, i.e., from −30° C. up to 10° C. Therefore, this inventive blend can be serviced in almost any ambient environment.
(132) Therefore, the HFO-1234yf/R-290 refrigerant blends noted herein uniquely provide improved capacity 2% to 22% over HFO-1234yf in the heating operating range from −30° C. to +10° C., extend the lower heating range capability over HFO-1234yf by a delta of 10 C, have extremely low GWP (less than 10) and low to mild flammability (class 2 to class 2L), while also uniquely exhibiting nearly negligible glide for all heat pump operating temperatures
(133) While all blends of HFO-1234yf and R-290 would be desirable, the preferred blends with advantageous flammability for a heat pump fluid are 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 78 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-290 to 22 wt % R-290, with more preferred blends being 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 80 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % to 20 wt % R-290 and most preferred blend being 99% HFO-1234yf to 90 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-290 to 10 wt % R-290.
(134) Cooling Mode (Propane)
(135) Thermodynamic Modeling Comparison for the Heat Pump Systems
(136) Cooling Mode: Propane
(137) A thermodynamic modeling program, Thermocycle 3.0, was used to model the expected performance of the blend versus HFO-1234yf compared to HFO-1234yf/Ethane. Model conditions used for the cooling mode are as follows, where heat exchanger #2 was varied in 10° C. increments:
(138) TABLE-US-00016 Modeling Conditions Heat Exchanger #1- Inside Cabin 0° C. Heat Exchange #2- Outside Air 20° C. to 40° C. (Ambient Air Temp) Superheat 10° C. Compressor Efficiency 70%
(139) TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 14 Heat Exchanger #2 = 20° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Heating Heating Inlet Disc Compressor Compessor Compressor Cooling Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (C.) (C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Heating R-1234yf (C) R-1234yf 10 33.7 314.2 589.3 1.9 2437.2 100.0 8.58 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 34.0 325.6 611.2 1.9 2517.4 103.3 8.54 99.5 0.14 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 34.7 367.3 684.9 1.9 2790.2 114.5 8.47 98.7 0.22 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 34.5 410.4 754.4 1.8 3037.9 124.6 8.49 99.0 0.01 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(140) TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 15 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 30° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Cooling Cooling Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Cooling Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Cooling R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 44.8 314.2 780.8 2.5 2204.5 100.0 5.36 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 45.2 324.5 807.4 2.5 2268.1 102.9 5.34 99.6 0.17 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 46.0 363.8 897.7 2.5 2492.1 113.0 5.28 98.5 0.31 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 46.4 406.4 984.3 2.4 2708.2 122.9 5.25 97.9 0.05 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(141) TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 16 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 40° C. Relative Relative (%) (%) Compressor Compressor Cooling Cooling Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Cooling Capacity COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Cooling R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 55.6 314.2 1015.6 3.2 1961.5 100.0 3.71 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 56.0 323.7 1047.4 3.2 2011.1 102.5 3.69 99.5 0.18 R-290 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 56.4 333.1 1077.1 3.2 2058.4 104.9 3.68 99.2 0.29 R-290 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 57.8 402.4 1262.8 3.2 2368.9 120.8 3.6 97.0 0.11 R-290 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(142) For any heat pump fluid to be a viable candidate, it needs to also perform well in the cooling mode, i.e., in higher ambient temperatures it needs to provide adequate cooling. Modeling results show that blends of HFO-1234yf with R-290 from 1 wt % to 10 wt % provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf in the cooling range from 20° C. up to 40° C. ambient.
(143) Blends of HFO-1234yf with R-290 (propane) from 1 wt % to 10 wt % also provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf in terms of improved cooling capacity. Modeling results show that even 1 wt % of R-290 has over 2% heat capacity improvement while up to 10% propane can significantly improve the relative cooling capacity up to 22%. The improved cooling capacity of the inventive blends shows that the new fluids can easily be used to provide adequate cooling (air-conditioning) to a passenger cabin. Additionally, the resultant inventive blends generally have a similar compressor discharge ratio versus neat HFO-1234yf over the cooling operating range.
(144) Modeling shows that blends of HFO-1234yf and R-290 (propane) from 1 wt % to 10 wt % have similar COP or energy performance in the cooling range from +20° C. to +40° C.
(145) Additionally, blends which contain 1 to 10 wt % R-290 (propane) also exhibit negligible glide over the desired cooling range, i.e., from +20° C. to +40° C. Therefore, this inventive blend can be serviced in almost any ambient environment.
(146) Therefore, the HFO-1234yf/R-290 refrigerant blends noted herein uniquely provide improved capacity 2% to 22% over HFO-1234yf in the cooling operating range from +20° C. to +40° C., have extremely low GWP (less than 10) and low to mild flammability (class 2 to class 2L), while also uniquely exhibiting nearly negligible glide for all heat pump operating temperatures
(147) While all blends of HFO-1234yf and R-290 would be desirable, the preferred blends with advantageous flammability (class 2 or class 2L) for a heat pump (i.e., operating in the heating or cooling mode) fluid are 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 78 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-290 to 22 wt % R-290, with more preferred blends being 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 80 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % to 20 wt % R-290 and most preferred blend being 99% HFO-1234yf to 90 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-290 to 10 wt % R-290.
(148) Cooling Mode: Ethane
(149) A thermodynamic modeling program, Thermocycle 3.0, was used to model the expected performance of the blend versus HFO-1234yf compared to HFO-1234yf/Propane. Model conditions used for the cooling mode are as follows, where heat exchanger #2 was varied in 10° C. increments:
(150) TABLE-US-00020 Modeling Conditions Heat Exchanger #1- Inside Cabin 0° C. Heat Exchange #2- Outside Air 20° C. to 40° C. (Ambient Air Temp) Superheat 10° C. Compressor Efficiency 70%
(151) TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 17 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 20° C. Relative (%) Relative Compr Compressor Cooling Cooling Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Cooling Cap COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Cooling R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 33.7 314.2 589.3 1.9 2437.2 100.0 8.58 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 34.8 337.8 642.9 1.9 2629.2 107.9 8.41 98.0 0.69 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 37.3 436.9 841.6 1.9 3387.0 139.0 8.24 96.0 1.74 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 38.9 561.6 1063.5 1.9 4245.5 174.2 8.25 96.2 1.62 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(152) TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 18 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 30° C. Relative (%) Relative Compr Compressor Cooling Cooling Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Cooling Cap COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant ° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Cooling R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 44.8 314.2 780.8 2.5 2204.46 100.0 5.36 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 46.2 334.5 845.3 2.5 2354.0 106.8 5.28 98.5 0.82 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 50.0 421.6 1087.1 2.6 2950.6 133.8 5.15 96.1 2.28 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 52.7 536.0 1361.1 2.5 3650.6 165.6 5.10 95.1 2.305 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(153) TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 19 Heat Exchanger #2 T = 40° C. Relative (%) Relative Compr Compressor Cooling Cooling Inlet Disc Compressor Compressor Compressor Cooling Cap COP Ave Temp Temp Inlet Pres Disc Pres Discharge Capacity vs COP vs Glide Refrigerant (° C.) (° C.) (kPa) (kPa) Ratio (kJ/m3) R-1234yf Cooling R-1234yf (K) R-1234yf 10 55.6 314.2 1015.6 3.2 1961.48 100.0 3.71 100.0 R-1234yf/ 10 57.2 332.1 1092.4 3.3 2079.14 106.0 3.7 98.9 0.87 R-170 (99 wt %/ 1 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 62.2 409.2 1383.2 3.4 2543.9 129.7 3.56 96.0 2.60 R-170 (95 wt %/ 5 wt %) R-1234yf/ 10 71.4 512.8 1717.3 3.3 2917.4 148.7 3.27 88.1 2.82 R-170 (90 wt %/ 10 wt %)
(154) For any heat pump fluid to be a viable candidate, it needs to also perform well in the cooling mode, i.e., in higher ambient temperatures it needs to provide adequate cooling. Modeling results show that blends of HFO-1234yf with R-170 from 1 wt % to 10 wt % provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf in the cooling range from +20° C. up to +40° C. ambient.
(155) Blends of HFO-1234yf with R-170 (ethane) from 1 wt % to 10 wt % also provide a significant advantage over neat HFO-1234yf in terms of improved cooling capacity. Modeling results show that even 1 wt % of R-170 has over 6-7% heat capacity improvement while up to 10% ethane can significantly improve the relative cooling capacity up to 50-70%. The improved cooling capacity of the inventive blends shows that the new fluids can easily be used to provide adequate cooling (air-conditioning) to a passenger cabin. Additionally, the resultant inventive blends generally have a similar compressor discharge ratio versus neat HFO-1234yf over the cooling operating range.
(156) Modeling shows that blends of HFO-1234yf and R-170 (ethane) from 1 wt % to 10 wt % have similar COP or energy performance in the cooling range from +20° C. to +40° C.
(157) Additionally, blends which contain 1 to 10 wt % R-170 (ethane) also exhibit negligible glide over the desired cooling range, i.e., from +20° C. to +40° C. Therefore, this inventive blend can be serviced in almost any ambient environment.
(158) Therefore, the HFO-1234yf/R-170 refrigerant blends noted herein uniquely provide improved capacity 2% to 22% over HFO-1234yf in the cooling operating range from +20 to +40 C, have extremely low GWP (less than 10) and low to mild flammability (class 2 to class 2L), while also uniquely exhibiting nearly negligible glide for all heat pump operating temperatures.
(159) While all blends of HFO-1234yf and R-170 would be desirable, the preferred blends with advantageous flammability for a heat pump fluid are 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 63.5 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-170 to 36.5 wt % R-170, with more preferred blends being 99 wt % HFO-1234yf to 90 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % to 10 wt % R-170 and most preferred blend being 99% HFO-1234yf to 93 wt % HFO-1234yf and 1 wt % R-170 to 7 wt % R-170.
(160) While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.