ROTOR HAVING CRACK MITIGATOR
20230323775 · 2023-10-12
Inventors
Cpc classification
F05D2250/71
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2250/294
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2250/712
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2250/141
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01D5/048
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2260/941
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2250/711
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A rotor for an aircraft engine, has: a hub extending circumferentially about a central axis, the hub having a bore, a gaspath-facing surface located radially outwardly of the bore relative to the central axis, a first face extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface, and a second face opposite the first face and extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface; blades circumferentially distributed about the central axis, the blades protruding away from the gaspath-facing surface of the hub; and a crack mitigator located on the first face, the crack mitigator extending circumferentially relative to the central axis, the crack mitigator extending axially from a baseline surface of the first face.
Claims
1. A rotor for an aircraft engine, comprising: a hub extending circumferentially about a central axis, the hub having a bore, a gaspath-facing surface located radially outwardly of the bore relative to the central axis, a first face extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface, and a second face opposite the first face and extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface; blades circumferentially distributed about the central axis, the blades protruding away from the gaspath-facing surface of the hub; and at least two crack mitigators each being a groove or a bump, the groove or the bump extending in an axial direction relative to the central axis from the first face, the at least two crack mitigators radially offset from one another and located on the first face, the at least two crack mitigators extending circumferentially relative to the central axis, the at least two crack mitigators extending axially from a baseline surface of the first face, the at least two crack mitigators having a height (H.sub.1) extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis and a depth (D.sub.1) extending in the axial direction relative to the central axis, the height greater than the depth, a ratio of the depth (D1) to the height (H.sub.1) ranges from 0.01 to 0.5, a portion of the baseline surface located radially between the bore and a radially-inner most one of the at least two crack mitigators.
2. The rotor of claim 1, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are located radially outwardly of a mid-plane of the first face, the mid-plane located halfway between the bore and a radially outward-most location of the gaspath-facing surface.
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. The rotor of claim 1, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are at least two grooves, a ratio of a distance (S.sub.12) between the at least two grooves to a sum of heights (H.sub.1, H.sub.2) of the at least two grooves ranging from 0.25 to 5, the heights extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis.
7. (canceled)
8. (canceled)
9. (canceled)
10. The rotor of claim 1, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are at least two bumps, a ratio of a distance (S12) between the at least two bumps to a sum of heights (H1, H2) of the at least two bumps ranging from 0.25 to 5, the heights extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis.
11. The rotor of claim 1, wherein the at least two crack mitigators include at least one bump and at least one groove.
12. The rotor of claim 11, wherein the at least one bump is located radially outwardly of the at least one groove.
13. A compressor section of an aircraft engine, the compressor section having an impeller rotatable about a central axis, the impeller comprising: a hub extending circumferentially about a central axis, the hub having a bore, a gaspath-facing surface located radially outwardly of the bore relative to the central axis, a first face extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface, and a second face opposite the first face and extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface; blades circumferentially distributed about the central axis, the blades protruding from the gaspath-facing surface of the hub; and at least two crack mitigators each being a groove or a bump, the groove or the bump extending in an axial direction relative to the central axis from the first face, the at least two crack mitigators radially offset from one another and located on the first face and extending circumferentially about the central axis, the at least two crack mitigators extending from a baseline surface of the first face, the at least two crack mitigators having a height (H.sub.1) extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis and a depth (D.sub.1) extending in the axial direction relative to the central axis, the height greater than the depth, a ratio of the depth (D1) to the height (H.sub.1) ranges from 0.01 to 0.5, a portion of the baseline surface located radially between the bore and a radially-inner most one of the at least two crack mitigators.
14. The compressor section of claim 13, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are located radially outwardly of a mid-plane of the first face, the mid-plane located halfway between the bore and a radially outward-most location of the gaspath-facing surface.
15. (canceled)
16. (canceled)
17. The compressor section of claim 13, wherein a ratio of a distance (S.sub.12) between the at least two crack mitigators to a sum of heights (H.sub.1, H.sub.2) of the at least two crack mitigators ranging from 0.25 to 5, the heights extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis.
18. The compressor section of claim 13, wherein one of the at least two crack mitigators is a bump, the other of the at least two crack mitigators being a groove, the bump located radially outwardly of the groove.
19. The compressor section of claim 13, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are bumps.
20. The compressor section of claim 13, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are grooves.
21. A rotor for an aircraft engine, comprising: a hub extending circumferentially about a central axis, the hub having a bore, a gaspath-facing surface located radially outwardly of the bore relative to the central axis, a first face extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface, and a second face opposite the first face and extending from the bore to the gaspath-facing surface; blades circumferentially distributed about the central axis, the blades protruding away from the gaspath-facing surface of the hub; and at least two crack mitigators each being a groove or a bump, the groove or the bump extending in an axial direction relative to the central axis from the first face, the at least two crack mitigators radially offset from one another and located on the first face, the at least two crack mitigators extending circumferentially relative to the central axis, the at least two crack mitigators extending axially from a baseline surface of the first face, the at least two crack mitigators having a height (H.sub.1) extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis and a depth (D.sub.1) extending in the axial direction relative to the central axis, the height greater than the depth, a portion of the baseline surface located radially between the bore and a radially-inner most one of the at least two crack mitigators, a ratio of a distance (S.sub.12) between the at least two crack mitigators to a sum of heights (H.sub.1, H.sub.2) of the at least two crack mitigators ranging from 0.25 to 5, the heights extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis.
22. The rotor of claim 21, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are bumps.
23. The rotor of claim 21, wherein the at least two crack mitigators are grooves.
24. The rotor of claim 21, wherein one of the at least two crack mitigators is a bump, the other of the at least two crack mitigators being a groove, the bump located radially outwardly of the groove.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0025] Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0033]
[0034] Referring to
[0035] Following prolonged utilization, a fatigue crack may form on a hub of the impeller I. Damage tolerance methods and tools can be used to determine the remaining crack propagation life and trajectory of the crack leading up to the need to replace the impeller I. Depending of where a crack initiates, it may affect the way said crack propagates. For instance, at higher and lower radii, such as within zones A and C, the dominant low-cycle fatigue stress is along a circumferential direction relative to the central axis 11 (i.e., hoop dominated). At a mid-radius location, such as within zone B, the dominant low-cycle fatigue stress is along a radial direction relative to the central axis 11. Length of arrows presented in
[0036] When a crack initiates from a hoop dominated stress field (e.g., zones A or C) or where a bi-axiality ratio of one, the crack can initiate either in the radial direction, or at an angle. If a crack initiates at an angle and it is left to propagate, it may continue to grow at the same angle it initiated until it enters a unique stress field where both ends of the crack are dominated by hoop loading. This may result in the crack to turn on opposite ends in radially opposite directions.
[0037] When a crack initiates from a radially dominated stress field (e.g., zone B), this crack will likely be perpendicular to the radial load. When left to propagate, this crack may continue to grow perpendicular to the radial load until it enters a higher radius, where hoop loading begins to dominate. In this case, the hoop loading turns the crack such that both ends of the crack propagate radially outwardly toward a gaspath-facing surface of the impeller. For safety reasons, it is preferred to have a crack that propagate perpendicularly to the radial load and grow toward the gaspath-facing surface, instead of growing toward the bore.
[0038] Regardless of stress state, should a crack initiate in a radial direction, the radial load may never contribute to the growth of the crack. In some cases, only the hoop load may drive the growth of the crack toward the bore.
[0039] The present disclosure proposes a rotor presenting crack mitigators, which may be in the form of bumps or grooves, that are used to reduce risks of cracks growing towards a bore of the rotor. In some embodiments, the crack mitigators may introduce a stress concentration factor in a radial flow stress direction as well as increase the local nominal stress. This may help to maximise the radial contribution of crack growth. These crack mitigators may increase a size of an area on the impeller I where a crack would grow toward the gaspath-facing surface, instead of growing toward the bore. These crack mitigators may be used for compressor rotors where the resulting disc stresses may be low and the corresponding low cycle fatigue life may be high. The crack mitigators may be designed to avoid altering the minimum life of the rotor while minimizing risks of cracks propagating towards the bore.
[0040] Referring now to
[0041] The impeller 30 has a hub 31 that extends circumferential about the central axis 11 of the gas turbine engine 10. The hub 31 has a bore 32 and a gaspath-facing surface 33 located radially outwardly of the bore 32 relative to the central axis 11. The hub 31 includes a front face 34 that extends from the bore 32 to the gaspath-facing surface 33. The hub 31 includes a back face 35 that extends from the bore 32 to the gaspath-facing surface 33. The impeller 30 includes blades 36 that are circumferentially distributed about the central axis 11. The blades 36 protrude from the gaspath-facing surface 33 of the hub 31. In the embodiment shown, the impeller 30 has an inlet 301 that is oriented substantially axially relative to the central axis 11 and an outlet 300 that is oriented substantially radially relative to the central axis 11. Hence, the blades 36 and flow paths defined between each two adjacent ones of the blades 36 curve from a substantially axial orientation to a substantially radial orientation relative to the central axis 11.
[0042] The impeller 30 may include one or more crack mitigator 40 that are use to at least partially alleviate effects of cracks on the hub 31 of the impeller 30. In the embodiment shown, the crack mitigators 40 are grooves 41 located on the back face 35 of the hub 31. It will be appreciated that the crack mitigators 40 may be located at any suitable locations on the hub 31. For instance, the crack mitigators may be located on one or more of a front face and a back face of a disc of a rotor of an axial compressor or turbine.
[0043] The grooves 41 extend circumferentially about the central axis 11. Although three grooves 41 are shown in
[0044] Referring to
[0045] As shown in
[0046] As shown more particularly on
[0047] Referring now to
[0048] In the embodiment shown, the impeller 130 has crack mitigators 40 provided in the form of bumps 42. It will be appreciated that the crack mitigators 40 may be located at any suitable locations on the hub 31. For instance, the crack mitigators may be located on one or more of a front face and a back face of a disc of a rotor of an axial compressor or turbine.
[0049] The bumps 42 extend circumferentially about the central axis 11. Although three bumps 42 are shown in
[0050] The bumps 42 extend from the baseline surface S of the back face 35 of the hub 31. In the present embodiment, the bumps 42 extend from the baseline surface S away from the front face 34 and away from the back face 35 in the direction having the axial component relative to the central axis 11. In other words, the bumps 42 protrude from a body of the hub 31. Material may therefore be added to the hub 31 to create the bumps 42. Intersections between the baseline surface S and the bumps 42 may be smooth. In other words, fillets may be present at those intersections.
[0051] As for the grooves 41, the bumps 42 may be located radially outwardly of the mid-plane of the back face 35. The bumps 42 may have the same dimensions of the grooves 41. That is, the bumps 42 may have a depth D.sub.1 extending in the axial direction and a height H.sub.1 extending in a radial direction relative to the central axis 11. A ratio of the depth D.sub.1 to the height H.sub.1 may range from 0.01 to 0.5. A ratio of a distance S.sub.12 between two adjacent bumps 42 to a sum of heights H.sub.1, H.sub.2 of the two adjacent bumps 42 may range from 0.1 to 0.5, in some cases from 0.25 to 5. The heights H.sub.1, H.sub.2 may extend in the radial direction relative to the central axis 11.
[0052] Referring now to
[0053] In the embodiment shown, the impeller 230 includes crack mitigators, which are provided here as a combination of grooves 41 and bumps 42. The grooves 41 may be effective at directing a crack whereas the bumps 42 may be effective at slowing down crack propagation. Consequently, a combination of bump(s) 42 and groove(s) 41 may redirect new cracks in the circumferential direction and slow down propagation of cracks that tend to propagate towards the bore 32.
[0054] In the embodiment shown, the impeller 230 includes at least one grooves 41 as described above with reference to
[0055] Referring to
[0056] It will be appreciated that the crack mitigator as defined herein may include any of the following, in any combination: a protrusion, a projection, a stiffener, a tab, a flange, a pin, a cavity, an aperture, and a recess. All such structures are understood to constitute a structure that mitigates cracks and forms a crack mitigator as defined herein.
[0057] The embodiments described in this document provide non-limiting examples of possible implementations of the present technology. Upon review of the present disclosure, a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of the present technology. Yet further modifications could be implemented by a person of ordinary skill in the art in view of the present disclosure, which modifications would be within the scope of the present technology.