Piston ring and method for manufacturing a piston ring

Abstract

A piston ring that is pre-treated by grit blasting to a defined roughness, followed by PVD coating with a metal nitride to a thickness of at least 10 μm, leaving peaks and valleys in the coated piston ring. The coated piston ring is then lapped to remove the peaks without penetrating the coating, so that valleys and plateaus remain in the coated surface. The resulting piston ring exhibits superior coating retention due to the increased surface area created by the grit blasting, and yet also superior performance, as the cavities remaining increase the porosity of the coating and thus enhance the lubrication of the ring.

Claims

1. A piston ring comprising: a ring formed of a base material and having a face and a chamfer surface that have been surface roughened to a roughness average R.sub.a of between 0.3 and 1.5 μm; and a coating disposed on at least the face and chamfer surfaces, the coating being deposited by physical vapor deposition and then lapped to remove peaks without penetrating the coating, so that the base material of the piston ring contains peaks and valleys, and the surface of the piston ring contains plateaus and valleys that correspond to the peaks and valleys, respectively, of the base material, such that the plateaus are disposed directly above the peaks, and the valleys of the surface of the piston ring are disposed directly above the valleys of the base material.

2. The piston ring according to claim 1, wherein the ring is made of steel that has been hardened via a case hardening or through hardening process.

3. The piston ring according to claim 1, wherein the coating is formed of a metal nitride or diamond-like carbon (DLC).

4. The piston ring according to claim 1, wherein the coating is a single-layer coating.

5. The piston ring according to claim 4, wherein the coating is formed of metal nitride.

6. The piston ring according to claim 4, wherein the coating is formed of diamond-like carbon (DLC).

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed as an illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.

(2) In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views:

(3) FIG. 1 shows a piston ring having a gap and a chamfered surface;

(4) FIG. 2 shows the face surface of the ring after grit blasting and coating;

(5) FIG. 3 shows the face surface of the ring after lapping;

(6) FIG. 4 shows the blast angles used during the grit blasting step of the invention;

(7) FIG. 5 shows photographs showing the surface roughness using grit of different sizes and combinations;

(8) FIG. 6 shows photographs showing the surface roughness using 35° and 55° blast angles as compared to 5° and 30° blast angles; and

(9) FIGS. 7a-7e show comparisons of a surface treated with grits of various sizes and combinations, along with various blast angles.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

(10) Referring now in detail to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a piston ring 10 according to the invention. Ring 10 has a face surface 11, a chamfer surface 12, and a gap 13. Face surface 11 and chamfer surface 12 are treated with grit blasting, generally with a grit of various sizes, to lead to a surface having a series of peaks 14 and valleys 15, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. A coating 20 is applied over the grit-blasted surface via physical vapor deposition (PVD) to a desired depth. Peaks 24 and valleys 25 are also in the coating. Then, as shown in FIG. 3, the peaks 24 of the coating are cut off via a lapping process to form plateaus 26 separated by valleys 25. By finding the optimal grit combinations and blasting angles, the piston ring of the present invention can be manufactured to exhibit high durability during high pressure situations, yet also exhibit high lubrication properties due to the porous nature of the coating.

(11) The preferred angles for grit blasting are shown in FIG. 4. Preferably an angle α of 35° to the face surface 12, and/or an angle β, of 55° to the face surface 12 are used for the grit blasting process. These angles are preferred over smaller and larger angles, as they give a more regular surface effect, and allow for the creation of pockets in the surface of the ring. These pockets increase lubrication retention. A comparison of blast angles is shown in FIG. 6, where using identical grit, blast angles of 35° and 55° are compared to blast angles of 5° and 30° for the face surfaces (upper quadrants) and chamfer surfaces (lower quadrants) of a piston ring according to the invention. As shown in FIG. 6, the blast angles of 35° and 55° show overall higher regularity in the surface, yet also allow for the creation of pockets in the surfaces.

(12) FIG. 5 shows a comparison of surface textures of the face surface (upper row) and chamfer surface (lower row) for various grit sizes and combinations. After experimentation, it was determined that a combination of grit sizes of 120/180/220 grit leads to the best surface regularity and roughness. The grit is used in a 1:1:1 ratio. The use of 120 grit media increases the overall roughness of the surface, while greater regularity is achieved with the addition of 220 grit media. The commonly used 320 grit media is shown for comparison. As can be seen, using grit between 120-180 leads to significantly rougher surfaces than when 320 grit is used.

(13) FIGS. 7a-7e show comparisons of a surface treated with grits of various sizes and combinations, along with various blast angles. FIG. 7a shows the use of 320 grit and 5° and 30° blast angles. The treated surface is relatively smooth. FIG. 7b shows treatment with 180/220 grit at 35° and 55° blast angles. This leads to significantly rougher texture on the surface. In comparison, FIG. 7c uses the same blast angles, but increases the grit size to 120/180. This leads to an even rougher surface but with uneven peaks and valleys. The preferred 120/180/220 grit combination, with the preferred angles of 35° and 55° is shown in FIG. 7d. Here, the surface is uniformly roughened. Changing the blast angles to 5° and 30°, as shown in FIG. 7e, leads to less uniformity in the roughness.

(14) Table 1 below illustrates the comparative average roughness using the various grit sizes and blast angles.

(15) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Face Chamfer R.sub.a R.sub.z R.sub.a R.sub.z 320 0.30 2.12 0.83 5.19 5° and 30° 180/220 0.87 6.66 1.02 6.81 35° and 55° 120/180 1.02 6.99 1.22 8.22 35° and 55° 120/180/220 0.85 6.28 1.26 7.91 35° and 55° 120/180/220 1.19 9.05 1.13 5.72 5° and 30°

(16) As can be seen above, the combination of 120/180/220 grit and the 35° and 55° blast angles gives the greatest average roughness R.sub.a for the chamfer, and second greatest mean R.sub.z, but yields a significantly lesser roughness in the face surface. This is optimal to create the best profile for performance of the rings. If the face surface is too rough, scuffing or bore marking of the cylinder liner can occur. However, for automotive applications, the removal of peaks through the lapping operation should be sufficient to eliminate this problem, as is supported by the results of the first engine test.

(17) In addition, having a slightly smoother face surface is optimal for uniformity of coating thickness and minimization of lapping time. High face roughness will require more lapping to remove during manufacturing, adding cost and resulting in a coating which fluctuates between thick and thin—thick in valleys, thin where peaks have been lapped off. This might also require increased coating thickness in order for the thin spots to be thick enough, which would add further time and cost to the manufacturing process.

(18) As shown in FIG. 5, using the 120/180/220 grit leads to more surface features than the 120/180 grit in both the face and chamfer region, and these features provide superior mechanical locking strength due to the increased roughness of the substrate while still providing for a manufacturing-friendly process.

(19) Higher chamfer roughness is ideal, since that is the area where coating failure often starts, and since the chamfer does not contact the ring face, increased roughness is not as much of a concern for scuffing etc., but does have the potential to further improve mechanical locking features of the coating.

(20) The rings of the present invention were also tested to see if the grit blasting had any significant effect on light tightness, ring tension and the size of the free gap in the ring. 88.1 mm rings and 92.5 mm prototype pieces were tested. Piston rings having the variations of grit blasting as shown in FIGS. 7a-7e exhibited suitable light tightness and acceptable tension and ring gap sizes that varied only slightly from an untreated ring. Thus, the addition of grit up to 120 in size had negligible effects on the ring free gap and tension and no adverse effects on light tightness, yet had significant effects on the surface roughness of the ring face and chamfer, giving the beneficial effects discussed above.

(21) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Free gap CD Tension Light Grit (mm) (N) Tightness None 12.64 23.5 good 320 12.51 23.5 good 180/220 12.56 23.1 good 120/180 12.17 22.6 good 120/180 (after 250° C.) 12.18 22.8 good 120/180/220 (35° and 55°) 11.97 22.3 good 120/180/220 (5° and 30°) 12.56 22.2 good

(22) Table 3 illustrates tests run on 88.1 mm piston rings and 92.5 mm prototypes that were treated with grit blasting and subjected to heating for 5 hours at 250° C. to illustrate furnace conditions of a PVD chamber. As shown in the table this treatment had a negligible effect on the ring characteristics.

(23) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Diameter Free gap CD Tension Light (mm) Condition (mm) (N) Tightness 88.1 120/180 Blasted 12.17 22.6 good After 250° C. for 5 hrs 12.18 22.8 good 92.5 120/180 Blasted 14.18 21.4 good After 250° C. for 5 hrs 14.22 21.4 good

(24) In addition, tests were conducted in an internal combustion engine, using the rings according to the invention. A minimum of 400 LSPI events occurred in the engine, with an average event pressure of about 190 bar. The rings according to the invention exhibited a 50% minimum area reduction in running face coating loss as compared to a standard ring treated with only 320 grit, and exhibited no scuffing or bore marking on the cylinder liner. In the exemplary form the testing has exhibited 93% reduction in coating loss achieved, demonstrating a significant improvement in adhesion strength.

(25) Accordingly, while only a few embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is obvious that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.