Preparation Method And Usage Method For Cartilage Tissue Recovery Collagen

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing collagen for restoring cartilage tissue usable for a joint in an injection manner, and a usage method thereof. The present invention provides a method of obtaining a high-concentration collagen-solution injection by aseptically filling an injection container with collagen separated from pig skin tissue, and a method of using the high-viscosity collagen loaded into the injection container for the purpose of cartilage restoration. Cartilage tissue regeneration is effectively induced when tissue restoration is implemented with respect to a cartilage-deficient portion using collagen, which is a biocompatible material, in a form that is capable of being injected into an application site with an injection needle without a surgical incision. Accordingly, restoration and regeneration of cartilage are easily and quickly induced in an animal, excluding a human, while relieving the burden related to surgery.

Claims

1. A method of manufacturing collagen for restoring a cartilage tissue, in which a pig skin tissue is fragmentized, washed, and subjected to enzyme treatment, a collagen is separated therefrom, and high-concentration collagen aseptically loaded into an injection container is obtained through salt treatment, sterilization by filtration, concentration, and filling processes, the method comprising: a process of separating the collagen from the pig skin tissue and filling the injection container with the collagen, the process comprising: washing the skin tissue separated from a pig using ethanol and sodium hydroxide, followed by fragmentizing; mixing the fragmentized tissue with an acidic solution containing an enzyme, followed by agitation to perform a reaction; adding NaCl in order to obtain the collagen separated from the tissue; performing passing through a membrane filter to separate collagen molecules, followed by passing through a filter to obtain the sterile collagen; performing agglomeration of the collagen using a pH and a temperature, followed by concentration via centrifugation; and filling the injection container with the concentrated collagen using sterile filling tools.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least 70% ethanol is used for 24 hours or less.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein sodium hydroxide having a pH of 11 or more is used for 2 hours or less.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the fragmentized tissue is mixed with the acidic solution containing the enzyme and having a pH of 3 or less and is then agitated at 30° C. or less for 3 to 5 days to perform a reaction.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein a pore size of the filter having pores is 0.22 .Math.m or less.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein a final concentration for obtaining the collagen separated from the tissue is 0.7 to 0.9 M.

7. A usage method of collagen for restoring a cartilage tissue manufactured by the method of claim 1, wherein the collagen with which an injection container is filled is usable for a joint in an injection manner in order to restore cartilage.

8. A usage method of collagen for restoring a cartilage tissue manufactured by the method of claim 1, wherein a collagen solution contained in an injection container is connected to an injection needle, and the injection needle is inserted into an application site without surgically incising the application site so that the collagen for restoring cartilage is injected into a joint.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0017] FIG. 1 shows a process of manufacturing a collagen solution aseptically loaded into an injection container.

[0018] FIG. 2 shows the collagen solution aseptically loaded into the injection container.

[0019] FIG. 3 is a photograph showing the collagen solution that is stained blue in order to confirm the effect of injection into a cartilage portion.

[0020] FIG. 4 is a photograph showing cartilage deficiency in a pig’s knee induced in order to confirm the effect of the collagen for injection.

[0021] FIG. 5 is a photograph showing the result of confirmation of the effect of injection of the collagen and the cartilage-deficient portion filled with the collagen.

[0022] FIG. 6 depicts concepts of collagen and hyaluronic acid injection treatment.

[0023] FIGS. 7A-7C depict photographs showing manufacture of cartilage-deficient model and surgical treatment of collagen injection.

[0024] FIGS. 8A-8H depict observation with naked eye to confirm state of restoration of cartilage-deficient portion of rabbit.

[0025] FIGS. 9A-9B depict histopathological analysis of rabbit cartilage tissue.

[0026] FIGS. 10A-10B depict results of analysis of treatment effect on experimental and control groups using VAS method.

[0027] FIGS. 11A-11F depict results of analysis of treatment effect on experimental group using VAS, WOMAC, and SF-36 methods.

MODE FOR INVENTION

Example 1

[0028] Method of aseptically filling an injection container with collagen after manufacture of high-concentration collagen from which immune site is removed

[0029] A pig skin tissue is fragmentized, washed, and subjected to enzyme treatment, collagen is separated therefrom, and high-concentration collagen aseptically loaded into an injection container is obtained through salt treatment, sterilization by filtration, concentration, and filling processes. [0030] 1. The obtained pig skin tissue is fragmentized after washing with ethanol (at least 70%, 24 hr) and sodium hydroxide (pH of 11 or more, 2 hr). [0031] 2. The fragmentized tissue is mixed with an acidic solution containing an enzyme (pH of 3 or less), followed by agitation at 30° C. or less for 3 to 5 days to perform a reaction. [0032] 3. NaCl is added thereto so that a final concentration is 0.7 to 0.9 M in order to obtain the collagen separated from the tissue. [0033] 4. Passing through a membrane filter is performed in order to separate materials (non-collagen protein, salt, pepsin, etc.) having a molecular weight that is smaller than a collagen molecular weight (300 kDa). [0034] 5. Passing through a filter having pores of 0.22 .Math.m is performed in order to obtain sterile collagen. [0035] 6. Agglomeration of the collagen using a pH and a temperature is performed, followed by concentration via centrifugation. [0036] 7. The injection container is filled with the concentrated collagen solution using sterile filling tools.

Example 2

[0037] Method of applying the collagen loaded into an injection container to the cartilage-deficient portion of an animal.

[0038] Purpose: To confirm the ability to apply collagen to the cartilage-deficient portion of a pig’s knee in an injection manner.

<Method and Effect Confirmation>

[0039] 1. A collagen solution (a concentration of 5 to 60 mg/mL) aseptically loaded into an injection container is prepared (collagen concentration). In order to realize cartilage restoration, which is the purpose of this product, it is required that the collagen concentration be 5 mg/mL or more so as to fill the deficient portion with the collagen and then maintain a predetermined form. Due to the characteristics (aseptic manufacture) of the process for manufacturing products for medical purposes (injection type), it difficult to manufacture, use in practice, and apply a product having a very high viscosity of 60 mg/mL or more. For this reason, the collagen concentration is set to the range of 5 mg/mL or more and 60 mg/mL or less.

[0040] 2. The collagen solution is stained with a small amount of blue dye (Trypan blue, bonded to proteins) in order to confirm with the naked eye the effect after injection into the knee cartilage tissue of an animal (pig).

[0041] 3. After a pig leg is fixed to a cradle to expose the cartilage of the knee joint using surgical devices, a drill is used to induce deficient portions having diameters of about 4 cm and depth of about 2 cm.

[0042] 4. An injection needle is connected to the injection container filled with the collagen. An injection needle that is 38 mm or more long is used.

[0043] 5. A cut portion is sutured using a suture thread, and the stained collagen contained in the injection container is directly injected into a glenoid cavity (space filled with synovia) of the pig’s knee.

[0044] 6. A knee joint motion (CPM: continuous passive motion) is performed to help the action of collagen naturally filling the deficient portion by injection. In addition, the sutured portion is cut to expose the cartilage portion into which the product is injected, and then is observed.

<Result>

[0045] The collagen injected into the deficient portion of the cartilage naturally filled a deficiency-induced portion, and the effect desired by the operator was observed.

Example 3

[0046] Application method for treating the cartilage of animals using collagen loaded into injection container.

[0047] Purpose: Test for confirming the cartilage curing effect of collagen loaded into an injection container using rabbits having deficient cartilage in joints thereof.

<Method and Effect Confirmation>

[0048] 1. A preclinical experiment was performed using a rabbit (New Zealand white rabbit) in order to confirm the effect of curing the cartilage of the joint. The experimental rabbits were fasted for one day before the manufacture of a cartilage-deficient model and the surgical treatment for collagen injection.

[0049] 2. The rabbits were anesthetized by injecting an anesthetic on the day of the surgical treatment, and the hair on a portion to be surgically treated was removed using a hair removal machine.

[0050] 3. After the completion of hair removal, the portion to be surgically treated was cleaned with 70% ethanol and then disinfected with povidin.

[0051] 4. After the knee joint skin of the rabbit was incised using a surgical operation device, the subcutaneous tissue was opened to expose the furrow portion of the patella of the articular cartilage.

[0052] 5. A cartilage defect that was 2 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth was induced using a surgical operation device.

[0053] 6. The incised subcutaneous tissue and skin were sutured using a suture thread and then disinfected with povidin.

[0054] 7. After an injection needle was placed in the injection container, collagen was injected into the cartilage-deficient portion.

[0055] 8. After cartilage defects were induced in the legs of the experimental rabbits as a control group using the above-described method, physiological saline was injected thereto.

[0056] 9. Antibiotics and analgesics were injected into the experimental rabbits, and the rabbits were placed in a rearing environment and checked the recovery from anesthesia. See FIGS. 7A-7C. FIG. 7A: Induction of cartilage defects, FIG. 7B: Size of cartilage defects (Ø 2 mm), FIG. 7C: Injection of collagen

[0057] 10. The knee joint tissues of the experimental rabbits were collected at the expense of the experimental rabbits 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after the completion of the surgical treatment, and change patterns (change of cartilage-deficient portions, surface states, and continuity of the border between the tissues surrounding the defects and neoplastic tissues) were observed with the naked eye.

[0058] 11. The tissues collected 3 and 12 weeks after the completion of the surgical treatment were fixed in 10% neutral formalin and were subjected to paraffin embedding to manufacture a 5 .Math.m tissue specimen. Hematoxylin-Eosin, Safranin O, Toluidine blue, Type 1 collagen and Type 2 collagen staining methods were performed to observe the regeneration of cells and substrates.

<Result>

[0059] The cartilage-deficient portion of the rabbit was observed with the naked eye 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after collagen and physiological saline were injected into the cartilage-deficient portion of the rabbit. As a result, it was confirmed that the deficient portion was restored after 3 weeks in the experimental group into which the collagen was injected. However, it was observed that the deficient portion was not properly restored even after 3 weeks in the control group. After that, it was confirmed that the cartilage surface was smooth because the deficient portion was restored in the experimental group into which the collagen was injected, but that the surface of the cartilage-deficient portion was not smooth in the control group into which the physiological saline was injected.

[0060] Experimental group: FIGS. 8A, 8B, 8C, and 8D, Control group: FIGS. 8E, 8F, 8G, and 8H, Observation time point: 3 weeks (FIGS. 8A and 8E), 6 weeks (FIGS. 8B and 8F),9 weeks (FIGS. 8C and 8G), 12 weeks (FIGS. 8D and 8H).

[0061] The cartilage of the rabbit, into which the collagen as the experimental group and the physiological saline as the control group were injected, was analyzed using tissue staining. As a result, it was confirmed that, in the case of the tissue into which the collagen was injected, a cartilage-deficient space was filled with the collagen after 3 weeks and the cartilage tissue was regenerated after 12 weeks. However, it was confirmed that the tissue into which the physiological saline was injected did not sufficiently fill the cartilage-deficient space after 3 weeks and the cartilage tissue was not sufficiently regenerated even after 12 weeks, and accordingly, the cartilage surface was not smooth.

[0062] FIG. 9A Specimens of experimental groups at 6th week (a-1: H&E staining method, a-2: type 1 collagen staining method). FIG. 9B Specimens of experimental and control groups at 3rd and 12th weeks (b: H&E staining method, c: Safranin-O staining method, d: Toluidine Blue staining method, e: type 1 collagen staining method, f: type 2 collagen staining method.

[0063] 1: Experimental group at 3rd week, 2: Experimental group at 12th week, 3: Control group at 3rd week, and 4: Control group at 12th week).

Example 4

[0064] Method using collagen loaded into injection container applied to treat patient suffering from knee arthritis.

[0065] Purpose: Test to confirm whether pain is relieved or the quality of life is improved after injecting collagen loaded into an injection container into the knee of a patient suffering from chondromalacia or degenerative arthritis.

<Method and Effect Confirmation>

[0066] 1. Two hundred patients suffering from chondromalacia or degenerative arthritis in the knees thereof were recruited.

[0067] 2. The patients that were recruited were randomly divided into an experimental group (group in which collagen was injected into the knee joint, BioCollagen group) and a control group (group in which saline was injected into the knee joint, placebo group) to perform surgical treatment.

[0068] 3. Patients were assessed for pain relief (VAS*), joint motion function improvement (WOMAC**), and daily life satisfaction (SF-36***) 4, 12 and 24 weeks after the completion of surgical treatment.

[0069] * VAS (Visual Analogue Scale): A method of quantifying the pain level of a patient. The lower the numerical value, the less pain.

[0070] ** WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index): A method of evaluating functional aspects of joint motion throughout a patient’s daily life with respect to pain of the knee joint. As evaluation items, pain, stiffness, and the quality of life were measured and compared. The lower the numerical value, the better the joint’s function.

[0071] *** SF-36 (36-Item Short-form Health Survey): A method of measuring a patient’s daily life satisfaction. The higher the numerical value, the higher the patient’s satisfaction.

<Result>

[0072] As a result of measurement and analysis using the VAS method, it was confirmed that, in the experimental group (group into which collagen was injected), the pain was relieved to 60.51 ± 13.82 mm before curing, but after 6 months, the pain was relieved to 28.88 ± 24.77 mm, FIG. 10A. Further, among the patients of the experimental group, 65 patients (73.86%) had a 20% improvement in VAS results and 59 patients (67.05%) had a 40% improvement, FIG. 10B. On the contrary, among the patients of the control group, 46 patients (54.12%) had a 20% improvement in VAS results and 38 patients (44.71%) had a 40% improvement (B). See FIG. 10A, 100 mm VAS analysis result, and FIG. 10B, Pain relief rate of the patient.

[0073] As a result of measurement and analysis using a VAS method, it was confirmed that, in the experimental group (group into which collagen was injected), the pain was relieved to 16.17 ± 18.18 after 4 weeks, 23.50 ± 24.88 after 12 weeks, and 28.40 ± 27.38 after 24 weeks in comparison with the case before curing, thereby verifying the pain-relieving effect, FIG. 11A. As a result of measurement and analysis using a WOMAC method, it was confirmed that, in the experimental group (group into which collagen was injected), the pain was relieved to 9.90 ± 13.62 after 4 weeks, 13.20 ± 15.96 after 12 weeks, and 13.46 ± 17.45 after 24 weeks in comparison with the case before curing, thus relieving pain and improving stiffness and the quality of life, FIG. 11B. In addition, as a result of measurement and analysis using a SF-36 method, it was confirmed that, in the experimental group (group into which collagen was injected), satisfaction with daily life was increased to 9.50 ± 12.97 after 4 weeks, 10.20 ± 16.62 after 12 weeks, and 11.79 ± 17.57 after 24 weeks in comparison with the case before treatment, FIG. 11C. See FIG. 11A 100 mm VAS analysis result, FIG. 11B WOMAC analysis result, FIG. 11C SF-36 analysis result, FIG. 11D WOMAC pain analysis result, FIG. 11E WOMAC stiffness analysis result, and FIG. 11F WOMAC quality of life.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0074] The technical idea of the method of manufacturing collagen for restoring cartilage tissue according to the present invention and the usage method thereof make it possible to repeatedly ensure the same result. In particular, the present invention can promote technical development, thus contributing to industrial development, so it is worth protecting.