Solid form of (-)-Ambrox formed by a bioconversion of homofarnesol in the presence of a biocatalyst
11773419 · 2023-10-03
Assignee
Inventors
- Ghislain SANHAJI (Warmeriville, FR)
- Alix ROUSSEAUX (Verzenay, FR)
- Sandrine NOEL (Warmeriville, FR)
- Eric EICHHORN (Zurich, CH)
Cpc classification
C12P17/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
A61Q13/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
A solid form of (−)-Ambrox formed by a bioconversion process.
Claims
1. A solid form containing (−)-Ambrox of the formula (I) ##STR00005## and containing greater than 0% to less than 5% by weight of any of the compounds II or IV ##STR00006##
2. The solid form according to claim 1, wherein it contains greater than 0% to less than 3% by weight of any of the compounds II or IV.
3. The solid form according to claim 2, wherein it contains greater than 0% to less than 2% by weight of any of the compounds II or IV.
4. A perfume composition comprising (−)-Ambrox of the formula (I) ##STR00007## at least one other perfume ingredient, and greater than 0% to less than 5% of one or more of the compounds II or IV ##STR00008##
5. A household care, personal care, laundry care or air care composition comprising the perfume composition according to claim 4.
6. A method of preparing the solid form according to claim 1 wherein the solid form of (−)-Ambrox is formed by a bioconversion process, said method comprising the steps of: I) forming crystalline (−)-Ambrox in a bioconversion medium by means of a biocatalytic process; and II) separating the crystalline (−)-Ambrox from the bioconversion medium; wherein the bioconversion process is an enzyme-catalyzed cyclization of homofarnesol comprising a mixture of 7E,3E and 7E,3Z geometric isomers of homofarnesol, wherein the cyclization reaction is carried out in the presence of an SHC biocatalyst capable of bioconverting homofarnesol to (−)-Ambrox.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the separation step is a filtration step, a decantation step, or a combination of both a filtration step and a decantation step.
8. The method according to claim 6, wherein prior to the separation step, the bioconversion medium is heated to a temperature of at least 55° C. to melt the crystalline (−)-Ambrox; and thereafter slowly cooled in order that the (−)-Ambrox is recrystallized from the bioconversion medium.
9. The method according to claim 6, wherein the recovered crystals of (−)-Ambrox are solubilized in a solvent, and the solution filtered through a sub-micron filter to remove any residual particulate material that was present in the bioconversion medium, before being rendered in solid form by removing the solvent by evaporation or recrystallization.
10. The method according to claim 6, wherein the enzyme is a wild-type squalene hopene cyclase, or a variant of the wild-type squalene hopene cyclase.
11. The method according to claim 6, wherein the crystals are washed with water, water-miscible solvents or mixtures thereof.
12. The method according to claim 6, wherein recovery of the (−)-Ambrox is achieved by its mechanical removal from a filter or decanter apparatus or belt filter, collection and drying.
13. The method according to claim 6, wherein the solution of the solubilised (−)-Ambrox crystals is contacted with a bleaching agent.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) For a greater understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the accompanying Figures, in which:—
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6) The invention will be further illustrated with reference to the following examples.
Example 1
(7) Preparation of Homofarnesol
(8) General Analytical Conditions:
(9) Non-polar GC/MS: 50° C./2 min, 20° C./min 200° C., 35° C./min 270° C. GC/MS Agilent 5975C MSD with HP 7890A Series GC system. Non-polar column: BPXS from SGE, 5% phenyl 95% dimethylpolysiloxane 0.22 mm×0.25 mm×12 m. Carrier Gas: Helium. Injector temperature: 230° C. Split 1:50. Flow: 1.0 ml/min. Transfer line: 250° C. MS-quadrupol: 106° C. MS-source: 230° C.
A) Preparation of MNU in THF
(10) A solution of urea (175 g, 2.9 mol) and methylamine hydrochloride (198 g, 2.9 mol) in water (400 ml) is heated at reflux (105° C.) for 3.5 h under stirring. At 40° C. NaNO.sub.2 (101 g, 1.45 mol) dissolved in water (200 ml) is added. After 15 min THF (1000 ml) is added which results in a transparent 2-phase mixture. Conc. H.sub.2SO.sub.4 (110 g, 1.1 mol) is added at 0-5° C. and stirring within 1.5 h. After another 0.5 h at 0-5° C., the two transparent phases are separated at 25° C. The organic phase (A) (1065 ml, theoretically 1.35 M) is stored for a few days at 0-5° C. or forwarded immediately to the cyclopropanation reactor.
(11) After phase separation, the water phase is extracted twice with THF (2×1 l). This gives 1100 ml of phase B and 1075 of phase C. Whereas phase A gives a 51% conversion of a terminal alkene to a cyclopropane in a subsequent cyclopropanation reaction, phase B gives <0.5% cyclopropane and phase C gives no detectable conversion. We conclude that >99% MNU is extracted after the first phase separation. Usually the water phase is therefore discarded after the first phase separation (from organic phase A) after treatment with conc. aqueous KOH and acetic acid
B) Preparation of E-Δ-Farnesene Using MNU in THF
(12) ##STR00004##
(13) N-Methyl-N-nitroso urea 1.35 M in THF (136 ml, 184 mmol) is added dropwise at 0° C. to a rapidly stirred mixture of E-beta-Farnesene (CAS 18794-84-8) (25 g, 122 mmol) and aqueous KOH (50 ml, 40%) at 0-5° C. After the addition of 4 ml of the MNU solution, Pd(acac).sub.2 (7.4 mg, 0.024 mmol, 0.02%) pre-dissolved in 0.5 ml dichloromethane is added. The remaining MNU solution is added over 4 h at 0-5° C. A GC at this stage showed 28% unconverted E-beta-Farnesene, 65% of the desired monocyclopropane (shown above) and 3% of a biscyclopropanated compound 5. After 16 h at 25° C., acetic acid (100 ml) is added at 0-5° C., then tert-butyl methyl ether (250 ml). After phase separation the organic phase is washed with 2M HCl (250 ml) and the aqueous phase extracted with tert-butyl methyl ether (250 ml). The combined organic layers are washed with water (2×100 ml), aqueous 10% NaOH (2×100 ml) and water (2×100 ml), dried over MgSO.sub.4, filtered and concentrated to give 26.9 g of a slightly yellow liquid which contains 9% E-beta-Farnesene, 82% of the desired monocyclopropane compound and 6% of a biscyclopropanated side product.
(14) The desired compound could be further isolated by distillative purification.
(15) Addition of 1 g K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (1 g) and distillation over a 30 cm steel coil column at 40-60 mbar gives 147 g monocyclopropane compound (68% corr) at 135-145° C. The fractions are pooled to give 92 g monocyclopropane compound of 100% purity.
(16) Analytical Data of E-Δ Farnesene:
(17) 1H-NMR (CDCl.sub.3, 400 MHz): 5.1 (2 m, 2H), 4.6 (2H), 2.2 (2H), 2.1 (4H), 2.0 (2H), 1.7 (s, 3H), 1.6 (2 s, 6H), 1.3 (1H), 0.6 (2H), 0.45 (2H) ppm. 13C-NMR (CDCl.sub.3, 400 MHz): 150.9 (s), 135.1 (s), 131.2 (s), 124.4 (d), 124.1 (d), 106.0 (t), 39.7 (t), 35.9 (t), 26.7 (t), 25.7 (q), 17.7 (q), 16.0 (d), 6.0 (t) ppm. GC/MS: 218 (2%, M+), 203 (5%, [M−15]+), 175 (11%), 147 (31%), 134 (15%), 133 (20%), 121 (12%), 107 (55%), 95 (16%), 93 (30%), 91 (20%), 82 (11%), 81 (33%), 79 (42%), 69 (100%), 67 (22%), 55 (20%), 53 (21%), 41 (75%). IR (film): 3081 (w), 2967 (m), 2915 (m), 2854 (m), 1642 (m), 1439 (m), 1377 (m), 1107 (w), 1047 (w), 1018 (m), 875 (s), 819 (m), 629 (w). Anal. calcd. for C.sub.16H.sub.26: C, 88.00; H, 12.00. Found: C, 87.80; H, 12.01.
C) Preparation of (7E)-4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-3,7,11-trien-1-ol ((7E)-homofarnesol)
(18) A mixture of (E)-(6,10-dimethylundeca-1,5,9-trien-2-yl)cyclopropane (E-Δ Farnesene) (1 g, 4.6 mmol), dodecane (0.2 g, 1.15 mmol, internal standard) and L-(+)-tartaric acid (1 g, 6.9 mmol) in a pressure tube is heated under stirring at 150° C. After 18 h and complete conversion (according to GC), the mixture is poured on water (50 ml) and toluene (50 ml). The phases are separated and the aqueous phase extracted with toluene (50 ml). The combined organic layers are washed with conc. aqueous Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 (50 ml) and conc. NaCl (2×50 ml), dried over MgSO.sub.4, filtered and evaporated under reduced pressure to give a brownish resin (1.35 g) which is mixed with 30% aqueous KOH (4.3 ml) and stirred at 25° C. for 2 h. GC analysis reveals formation of 96% (7E)-4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-3,7,11-trien-1-ol according to the internal standard. E/Z ratio 68:22. The analytical data of the E-isomer are consistent with the ones from the literature, see for example P. Kocienski, S. Wadman J. Org. Chem. 54, 1215 (1989).
Example 2
(19) SHC Plasmid Preparation and Biocatalyst Production
(20) SHC Plasmid Preparation
(21) The gene encoding Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius squalene hopene cyclase (AacSHC) (GenBank M73834, Swissprot P33247) was inserted into plasmid pET-28a(+), where it is under the control of an IPTG inducible T7-promotor for protein production in Escherichia co/i. The plasmid was transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3) using a standard heat-shock transformation protocol.
(22) Erlenmeyer Flask Cultures
(23) For protein production were used either rich medium (LB medium) or minimal media. M9 is one example of minimal media, which were successfully used.
(24) Media Preparation
(25) The minimal medium chosen as default was prepared as follows for 350 ml culture: to 35 ml citric acid/phosphate stock (133 g/l KH.sub.2PO.sub.4, 40 g/l (NH.sub.4).sub.2HPO.sub.4, 17 g/g citric acid.H.sub.2O with pH adjusted to 6.3) was added 307 ml H.sub.2O, the pH adjusted to 6.8 with 32% NaOH as required. After autoclaving 0.850 ml 50% MgSO.sub.4, 0.035 ml trace elements solution (composition in next section) solution, 0.035 ml Thiamin solution and 7 ml 20% glucose were added.
(26) SHC Biocatalyst Production (Biocatalyst Production)
(27) Small scale biocatalyst production (wild-type SHC or SHC variants), 350 ml culture (medium supplemented with 50 μg/ml kanamycin) were inoculated from a pre-culture of the E. coli strain BL21(DE3) containing the SHC production plasmid. Cells were grown to an optical density of approximately 0.5 (OD.sub.650nm) at 37° C. with constant agitation (250 rpm).
(28) Protein production was then induced by the addition of IPTG to a concentration of 300 μM followed by incubation for a further 5-6 hours with constant shaking. The resulting biomass was finally collected by centrifugation, washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.5. The cells were stored as pellets at 4° C. or −20° C. until further use. In general 2.5 to 4 grams of cells (wet weight) were obtained from 1 litre of culture, independently of the medium used.
(29) The fermentation was prepared and run in 750 ml InforsHT reactors. To the fermentation vessel was added 168 ml deionized water. The reaction vessel was equipped with all required probes (pO.sub.2, pH, sampling, antifoam), C+N feed and sodium hydroxide bottles and autoclaved. After autoclaving, the following ingredients are added to the reactor:— 20 ml 10× phosphate/citric acid buffer 14 ml 50% glucose 0.53 ml MgSO.sub.4 solution 2 ml (NH.sub.4).sub.2SO.sub.4 solution 0.020 ml trace elements solution 0.400 ml thiamine solution 0.200 ml kanamycin stock
(30) The reaction conditions are set as follows: pH=6.95, pO.sub.2=40%, T=30° C., Stirring at 300 rpm. Cascade: rpm setpoint at 300, min 300, max 1000, flow l/min set point 0.1, min 0, max 0.6. Antifoam control: 1:9.
(31) The fermenter was inoculated from a seed culture to an OD.sub.650nm of 0.4-0.5. This seed culture was grown in LB medium (+Kanamycin) at 37° C., 220 rpm for 8 h. The fermentation was run first in batch mode for 11.5 h, where after was started the C+N feed with a feed solution (sterilized glucose solution (143 ml H.sub.2O+35 g glucose) to which had been added after sterilization: 17.5 ml (NH.sub.4).sub.2SO.sub.4 solution, 1.8 ml MgSO.sub.4 solution, 0.018 ml trace elements solution, 0.360 ml Thiamine solution, 0.180 ml kanamycin stock. The feed was run at a constant flow rate of approx. 4.2 ml/h. Glucose and NH.sub.4.sup.+ measurements were done externally to evaluate availability of the C- and N-sources in the culture. Usually glucose levels stay very low.
(32) Cultures were grown for a total of approximately 25 hours, where they reached typically and OD.sub.650nm of 40-45. SHC production was then started by adding IPTG to a final concentration of approx. 1 mM in the fermenter (as IPTG pulse or over a period of 3-4 hours using an infusion syringe), setting the temperature to 40° C. and pO.sub.2 to 20%. Induction of SHC production lasted for 16 h at 40° C. At the end of induction the cells were collected by centrifugation, washed with 0.1 M citric acid/sodium citrate buffer pH 5.4 and stored as pellets at 4° C. or −20° C. until further use.
(33) Results Ia
(34) In general, with all other conditions unchanged the specific activity of the produced biocatalyst was higher when a minimal medium was used compared with a rich medium.
(35) Induction was carried out successfully at 30 or 37° C. It was noted that when the induction was done at 40-43° C., a biocatalyst of higher specific activity was obtained.
(36) Results Ib
(37) The following Table 1 shows for two examples the culture volume, optical density and amount of cells both at induction start and induction end as well as the amount of biomass collected (wet weight).
(38) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Volume OD.sub.650nm cells Volume induc- induc- calcu- induc- OD.sub.650nm, cells tion tion lated tion end induc- collect- start (ml) start (g) (ml) tion end ed (g) Example 1 273 40 10.9 342 55 28 Example 2 272 44 12.0 341 57 23 OD.sub.650nm at inoculation: 0.45 (Example 1) and 0.40 (Example 2). Starting volumes: 205 ml.
(39) TABLE-US-00002 Wild type SHC amino acid sequence (GenBank M73834, Swissprot P33247) (SEQ ID No. 1) MAEQLVEAPAYARTLDRAVEYLLSCQKDEGYWWGPLLSNVTMEAEYVLLCHILDRVDRDRMEKIRRYLLHEQREDGTWALY PGGPPDLDTTIEAYVALKYIGMSRDEEPMQKALRFIQSQGGIESSRVFTRMWLALVGEYPWEKVPMVPPEIMFLGKRMPLN IYEFGSWARATVVALSIVMSRQPVFPLPERARVPELYETDVPPRRRGAKGGGGWIFDALDRALHGYQKLSVHPFRRAAEIR ALDWLLERQAGDGSWGGIQPPWFYALIALKILDMTQHPAFIKGWEGLELYGVELDYGGWMFQASISPVWDTGLAVLALRAA GLPADHDRLVKAGEWLLDRQITVPGDWAVKRPNLKPGGFAFQFDNVYYPDVDDTAVVVWALNTLRLPDERRRRDAMTKGFR WIVGMQSSNGGWGAYDVDNTSDLPNHIPFCDFGEVTDPPSEDVTAHVLECFGSFGYDDAWKVIRRAVEYLKREQKPDGSWF GRWGVNYLYGTGAVVSALKAVGIDTREPYIQKALDWVEQHQNPDGGWGEDCRSYEDPAYAGKGASTPSQTAWALMALIAGG RAESEAARRGVQYLVETQRPDGGWDEPYYTGTGFPGDFYLGYTMYRHVFPTLALGRYKQAIERR Variant F601Y SHC amino acid sequence-variant with respect to SEQ ID No. 1 (SEQ ID No. 2) MAEQLVEAPAYARTLDRAVEYLLSCQKDEGYWWGPLLSNVTMEAEYVLLCHILDRVDRDRMEKIRRYLLHEQREDGTWALY PGGPPDLDTTIEAYVALKYIGMSRDEEPMQKALRFIQSQGGIESSRVFTRMWLALVGEYPWEKVPMVPPEIMFLGKRMPLN IYEFGSWARATVVALSIVMSRQPVFPLPERARVPELYETDVPPRRRGAKGGGGWIFDALDRALHGYQKLSVHPFRRAAEIR ALDWLLERQAGDGSWGGIQPPWFYALIALKILDMTQHPAFIKGWEGLELYGVELDYGGWMFQASISPVWDTGLAVLALRAA GLPADHDRLVKAGEWLLDRQITVPGDWAVKRPNLKPGGFAFQFDNVYYPDVDDTAVVVWALNTLRLPDERRRRDAMTKGFR WIVGMQSSNGGWGAYDVDNTSDLPNHIPFCDFGEVTDPPSEDVTAHVLECFGSFGYDDAWKVIRRAVEYLKREQKPDGSWF GRWGVNYLYGTGAVVSALKAVGIDTREPYIQKALDWVEQHQNPDGGWGEDCRSYEDPAYAGKGASTPSQTAWALMALIAGG RAESEAARRGVQYLVETQRPDGGWDEPYYTGTGYPGDFYLGYTMYRHVFPTLALGRYKQAIERR Variant F605W SHC nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 3) ATGGCTGAGCAGTTGGTGGAAGCGCCGGCCTACGCGCGGACGCTGGATCGCGCGGTGGAGTATCTCCTCTCCTGCCAAAAG GACGAAGGCTACTGGTGGGGGCCGCTTCTGAGCAACGTCACGATGGAAGCGGAGTACGTCCTCTTGTGCCACATTCTCGAT CGCGTCGATCGGGATCGCATGGAGAAGATCCGGCGGTACCTGTTGCACGAGCAGCGCGAGGACGGCACGTGGGCCCTGTAC CCGGGTGGGCCGCCGGACCTCGACACGACCATCGAGGCGTACGTCGCGCTCAAGTATATCGGCATGTCGCGCGACGAGGAG CCGATGCAGAAGGCGCTCCGGTTCATTCAGAGCCAGGGCGGGATCGAGTCGTCGCGCGTGTTCACGCGGATGTGGCTGGCG CTGGTGGGAGAATATCCGTGGGAGAAGGTGCCCATGGTCCCGCCGGAGATCATGTTCCTCGGCAAGCGCATGCCGCTCAAC ATCTACGAGTTTGGCTCGTGGGCTCGGGCGACCGTCGTGGCGCTCTCGATTGTGATGAGCCGCCAGCCGGTGTTCCCGCTG CCCGAGCGGGCGCGCGTGCCCGAGCTGTACGAGACCGACGTGCCTCCGCGCCGGCGCGGTGCCAAGGGAGGGGGTGGGTGG ATCTTCGACGCGCTCGACCGGGCGCTGCACGGGTATCAGAAGCTGTCGGTGCACCCGTTCCGCCGCGCGGCCGAGATCCGC GCCTTGGACTGGTTGCTCGAGCGCCAGGCCGGAGACGGCAGCTGGGGCGGGATTCAGCCGCCTTGGTTTTACGCGCTCATC GCGCTCAAGATTCTCGACATGACGCAGCATCCGGCGTTCATCAAGGGCTGGGAAGGTCTAGAGCTGTACGGCGTGGAGCTG GATTACGGAGGATGGATGTTTCAGGCTTCCATCTCGCCGGTGTGGGACACGGGCCTCGCCGTGCTCGCGCTGCGCGCTGCG GGGCTTCCGGCCGATCACGACCGCTTGGTCAAGGCGGGCGAGTGGCTGTTGGACCGGCAGATCACGGTTCCGGGCGACTGG GCGGTGAAGCGCCCGAACCTCAAGCCGGGCGGGTTCGCGTTCCAGTTCGACAACGTGTACTACCCGGACGTGGACGACACG GCCGTCGTGGTGTGGGCGCTCAACACCCTGCGCTTGCCGGACGAGCGCCGCAGGCGGGACGCCATGACGAAGGGATTCCGC TGGATTGTCGGCATGCAGAGCTCGAACGGCGGTTGGGGCGCCTACGACGTCGACAACACGAGCGATCTCCCGAACCACATC CCGTTCTGCGACTTCGGCGAAGTGACCGATCCGCCGTCAGAGGACGTCACCGCCCACGTGCTCGAGTGTTTCGGCAGCTTC GGGTACGATGACGCCTGGAAGGTCATCCGGCGCGCGGTGGAATATCTCAAGCGGGAGCAGAAGCCGGACGGCAGCTGGTTC GGTCGTTGGGGCGTCAATTACCTCTACGGCACGGGCGCGGTGGTGTCGGCGCTGAAGGCGGTCGGGATCGACACGCGCGAG CCGTACATTCAAAAGGCGCTCGACTGGGTCGAGCAGCATCAGAACCCGGACGGCGGCTGGGGCGAGGACTGCCGCTCGTAC GAGGATCCGGCGTACGCGGGTAAGGGCGCGAGCACCCCGTCGCAGACGGCCTGGGCGCTGATGGCGCTCATCGCGGGCGGC AGGGCGGAGTCCGAGGCCGCGCGCCGCGGCGTGCAATACCTCGTGGAGACGCAGCGCCCGGACGGCGGCTGGGATGAGCCG TACTACACCGGCACGGGCTTCCCAGGGGATTGGTACCTCGGCTACACCATGTACCGCCACGTGTTTCCGACGCTCGCGCTC GGCCGCTACAAGCAAGCCATCGAGCGCAGGTGA Variant F605W SHC amino acid sequence-variant with respect to SEQ ID No. 1 (SEQ ID No. 4) MAEQLVEAPAYARTLDRAVEYLLSCQKDEGYWWGPLLSNVTMEAEYVLLCHILDRVDRDRMEKIRRYLLHEQREDGTWALY PGGPPDLDTTIEAYVALKYIGMSRDEEPMQKALRFIQSQGGIESSRVFTRMWLALVGEYPWEKVPMVPPEIMFLGKRMPLN IYEFGSWARATVVALSIVMSRQPVFPLPERARVPELYETDVPPRRRGAKGGGGWIFDALDRALHGYQKLSVHPFRRAAEIR ALDWLLERQAGDGSWGGIQPPWFYALIALKILDMTQHPAFIKGWEGLELYGVELDYGGWMFQASISPVWDTGLAVLALRAA GLPADHDRLVKAGEWLLDRQITVPGDWAVKRPNLKPGGFAFQFDNVYYPDVDDTAVVVWALNTLRLPDERRRRDAMTKGFR WIVGMQSSNGGWGAYDVDNTSDLPNHIPFCDFGEVTDPPSEDVTAHVLECFGSFGYDDAWKVIRRAVEYLKREQKPDGSWF GRWGVNYLYGTGAVVSALKAVGIDTREPYIQKALDWVEQHQNPDGGWGEDCRSYEDPAYAGKGASTPSQTAWALMALIAGG RAESEAARRGVQYLVETQRPDGGWDEPYYTGTGFPGDWYLGYTMYRHVFPTLALGRYKQAIERR
Example 3a
(40) Bioconversion of 7E, 3E/Z-Homofarnesol Mixture
(41) Bioconversion was Undertaken Using the Following Reaction Conditions:
(42) The reaction (150.1 g total volume) run in 0.1 M citric acid/sodium citrate buffer pH 5.4 in an InforsHT 750 ml fermenter contained 146 g/l total homofarnesol using a homofarnesol substrate, which was a mixture of 7E,3E:7E,3Z of 86:14, 250 g/l cells (formed in accordance with the method of Example 2, fermentation) and 1.55% SDS. The reaction was run at 35° C. with constant stirring (900 rpm), pH control was done using 10 to 40% citric acid in water.
(43) The reaction mixture was subjected to isolation and purification steps as set forth in Example 4, below.
Example 3b
(44) Bioconversion of 7E, 3E/Z-Homofarnesol Mixture
(45) Bioconversion was Undertaken Using the Following Reaction Conditions:
(46) A reaction (2.5 ml total volume) was run with vigorous shaking (800 rpm) at 50° C. and pH 6.0 in 0.1 M citric acid/sodium citrate buffer in a 11 ml a glass reaction vessel on an Heidolph Synthesis 1 apparatus. The reaction contained 1 g/l E,E-Homofarnesol (from a Homofanesol stock of EE:EZ ratio of 86:14), cells that had produced the wild type SHC enzyme in accordance with the method described in Example 2 to an OD.sub.650nm of 30 and 0.12% SDS. About 48 h after reaction start was E,E-Homofarnesol conversion about 60%. When the reaction was cooled down to room temperature, Ambrofix crystals appeared upon microscopic analysis of a sample taken from the reaction mixture. A further addition of cells equivalent to an in increase in OD.sub.650nm by 10 and further incubation for 24 hours allowed complete E,E-Homofarnesol conversion. Microscopic observation of a sample of the reaction mixture indicated the presence of an increased number of Ambrofix crystals.
(47) The reaction was also run in an InforsHT 750 ml fermenter in 150.1 g total volume at pH 6.0 in 0.1 M citric acid/sodium citrate buffer. The reaction contained 1 g/l E,E-Homofarnesol, 0.12% SDS and cells that had produced wild type SHC at 118 g/l wet weight and was incubated at 50° C. with vigorous shaking (700 rpm). Approximately 30 hours after reaction start was E,E-Homofarnesol conversion approximately 85%. Microscopic observation of a sample of the reaction mixture allowed identification of Ambrofix crystals. Homofarnesol was added again to an equivalent of 1 g/l and the reaction run for an additional approx. 50 hours; cells were added as well to the equivalent of 32 g/l (wet weight). About 66 hours total reaction time was E,E-Homofarnesol conversion approximately 85%. Microscopic observation of the reaction mixture allowed the observation of an increased number of Ambrox crystals.
Example 4
(48) A general down-stream process is set forth in
(49) In a first step, the bioconversion medium is heated to a temperature of about 80 to 85° C. for a period of about 15 minutes, melting the crystals of (−)-Ambrox The (−)-Ambrox, which is liquid at this stage is recrystallized by cooling the reaction medium to a temperature of 20° C. at a rate of about 5° C. per hour.
(50) In a second step, after (−)-Ambrox has crystallized, the crystals are separated from the bioconversion medium by filtration. Filtration is carried out in a continuous screen centrifuge (Siebtechnic H250) with a sieve size 100 microns. The centrifuge is operated at an acceleration of 2028 G, and a feed rate of 430 kg/hour. Owing to the significant size difference between crystals and cell debris, most of the crystals are retained on the sieve, and can be washed with water and collected mechanically by means of a knife provided for such a purpose.
(51) In a third step, the filtrate from the second step is fed into a continuous decanter set up to separate cell debris, retained in the supernatant, from any crystals that passed through the filter in step 2, which settle in the decanter apparatus as a sediment. The decanter is operated at 1170 G and a feed rate of 370 kg/hour. The crystals collected in the decanter are washed with water, and combined with the crystals obtained in step 2. The combined crystals are washed and decanted statically to remove any residual cell debris in the supernatant, and the washed crystals are ready for further processing.
(52) In a fourth step, the washed crystals are re-solubilized with ethanol (96% technical grade) in an amount of 1 mass crystals to 4 mass ethanol. The solution is filtered over a submicron filter (0.6 to 1.0 micron, KDS15) at ambient temperature and 1 bar pressure, before being filtered again through a 0.22 micron filter.
(53) The (−)-Ambrofix extract thus formed can be subjected to further deodourizing and decolouration steps, as follows.
(54) The ethanolic solution was concentrated to dryness under vacuum. The concentrate was re-dissolved in industrial grade denatured ethanol and a bleaching agent (Tonsil 412FF) plus a diatomaceous earth filter agent (CELATOM FW 50) were added under stirring. The mixture was refluxed at 80-85° C. under stirring for 30 minutes, before cooling to 55-60° C. The mixture was filtered over a 25 micron filter to remove the solid materials.
(55) Excess denatured alcohol was eliminated from the clear bleached solution by atmospheric pressure distillation. Water was then fed to the hot solution and the resulting mixture agitated for 15 minutes at 75-80° C. The (−)-Ambrox was crystallized by gradually cooling this solution down to −10 to −15° C. The crystallized (−)-Ambrox was filtered off and dried in a vacuum oven (50-60° C.; 1-5 mbar).
Example 5a
(56) Down Stream Processing: Comparison of Solid-Liquid Separation and Toluene Extraction as a Means of Selectively Isolating (−)-Ambrox from the Bioconversion Medium
(57) 200 ml of inactivated bioconversion medium was extracted with MTBE and analyzed by gas chromatography.
(58) Solid-Liquid Separation
(59) 200 ml of inactivated bioconversion medium was centrifuged to separate the solid from the liquid phase (Sorvall GS3, 5000 rpm, 10 min, 10° C.). This separated approx. 80 ml solid pellet from approx. a 120 ml liquid supernatant. The supernatant was removed, extracted with MTBE and analyzed by gas chromatography. Similarly, the pellet was extracted with MTBE and the MTBE extract analyzed by gas chromatography.
(60) Toluene Extraction
(61) 200 ml of bioconversion medium was extracted with 6×45 ml toluene. The organic phase was collected and filtered to remove any cell debris. Toluene was stripped off, and the residue dissolved in MTBE, before being analyzed by gas chromatography.
(62) Analysis
(63) The GC analysis results are depicted in
Example 5b
(64) Sensory Analysis
(65) Purpose: To Carry Out a Sensory Analysis of (−)-Ambrox and the Compounds (II), (III) and (IV) Formed in the Crude Material and in the Crystallised Material.
(66) Biotransformation of E,E-homofarnesol results in (−)-Ambrox, and compound (IV).
(67) Biotransformation of E,Z-homofarnesol results in the macrocyclic ether compound (II) and epi-Ambrox compound (III).
(68) A crude mixture of (−)-Ambrox comprises the desired (−)-Ambrox, compound (II), (III) and (IV) present in an amount of 87.1 wt %, 2.8 wt %, 2.5 wt % and 7.6 wt % respectively.
(69) When a crude mixture is selectively crystallised (lab scale), the crystallised material, when analyzed by gas chromatography has the same components as the crude mixture, but they are present in an amount of 99.1 wt %, 0.1 wt %, 0.1 wt % and 0.7 wt % respectively. The residues of (II), (III) and (IV) are believed to by oily residues attached to crystals of (−)-Ambrox.
(70) The Sensory Analytical Results were as follows:
(71) (−)-Ambrox: Odour Threshold 0.2 ng/l.
(72) Compound (IV): weak, IsoE, woody, GC-detection threshold 5-10 ng.
(73) Compound (II): “odorless” (GC-threshold>500 ng).
(74) Compound (III): GC-threshold about 10× higher than (−)-Ambrox (circa 2 ng).
(75) The sensory analysis of the 3 by-products (compounds II, III and IV) indicates a weaker odour than that from (−)-Ambrox. In fact, the epi-Ambrox (Compound III) odor is about 10 fold weaker than (−)-Ambrox suggesting that it is essentially odorless.
(76) The sensory analysis demonstrated that the removal of one of more by-product compounds from (−)-Ambrox can improve the odor of the remaining compound (i.e. ( ) Ambrox) even if the removed compounds are actually odorless compounds per se. That is, an Ambrox odor enhancement in terms of olfactive purity as determined by trained Perfumers (using recognised benchmarks for acceptable olfactive purity) was observed in the absence of compounds II, III and IV.
Example 6
(77) X-Ray Characterization of the Solid Form of (−) Ambrox Formed by the Microbial Fermentation Process
(78) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were acquired using a STOE STADI P X-ray diffractometer.
(79) System description: The diffractometer was used in transmission mode (flat sample holders, curved Germanium (111) monochromator, and CuKa1 radiation 1.54060 Angstrom) by using a position-sensitive detector. The generator Voltage was 40 kV and the current 40 mA. The detector: Mythen 1K.
(80) Experimental parameters: Pattern measurement was made between 2 theta=about 4° to 26°. The accuracy of the diffraction angles determined is approximately +1-0.2° 2 theta.