Dislocator Chemistries for Turbine Abradable or Machinable Coating Systems

Abstract

A coated article (20;60) includes a substrate (22) and a coating (24;62) on the substrate. The coating includes at least a first layer (30). The first layer has: a matrix (50); and a filler (52) at 2.0% to 40% by volume in the first layer. The first layer is selected from alkaline earth or transition metal (M) tungstates (MWO4); alkaline earth molybdates (MMoO.sub.4); rare earth (RE) phosphates (REPO.sub.4); and combinations thereof.

Claims

1. A coated article being a blade outer air seal comprising: a substrate having a concave inner diameter (ID) surface; and a coating on the substrate ID surface including at least a first layer, wherein the first layer comprises: a matrix; and a filler at 2.0% to 40% by volume in the first layer selected from: alkaline earth or transition metal (M) tungstates (MWO.sub.4); alkaline earth molybdates (MMoO.sub.4); rare earth (RE) phosphates (REPO.sub.4); and combinations thereof.

2. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the filler is at 5.0% to 30.0% by volume in the first layer.

3. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the first layer has 5.0% to 20% porosity.

4. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the filler comprises at 2.0% to 40% by volume in the first layer: CaWO.sub.4; BaWO.sub.4; ZnWO.sub.4; BaMoO.sub.4; SrMoO.sub.4; YPO.sub.4; LaPO.sub.4; and combinations thereof.

5. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the filler comprises at 5.0% to 30% by volume in the first layer: CaWO.sub.4; BaWO.sub.4; BaMoO.sub.4; SrMoO.sub.4; and combinations thereof.

6. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the filler comprises at 5.0% to 30% by volume in the first layer: CaWO.sub.4.

7. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the matrix comprises at least 50% by volume one or more rare earth, zirconium, or hafnium silicates.

8. The coated article of claim 7 wherein: the rare earth silicate comprises at least one of yttrium monosilicate, yttrium disilicate, ytterbium monosilicate, and ytterbium disilicate.

9. The coated article of claim 8 further comprising: an environmental barrier layer between the substrate and the first layer and comprising at least 50% by volume hafnium monosilicate.

10. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the substrate is a ceramic matrix composite.

11. The coated article of claim 1 further comprising: a bond coat comprising a SiOC-BMAS mixture.

12. The coated article of claim 1 further comprising: an environmental barrier layer between the substrate and the first layer and comprising at least 50% by volume one or more rare earth, zirconium, or hafnium silicates.

13. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the filler has a melting point of 1450° C. to 2100° C.

14. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the filler has a melting point within 400° C. of melting points of a majority of the matrix by weight.

15. The coated article of claim 1 wherein: the coating includes a bond coat between the substrate and the first layer.

16. (canceled)

17. An engine comprising the blade outer air seal of claim 16 and further comprising: a stage of blades adjacent the ID surface.

18. (canceled)

19. (canceled)

20. (canceled)

21. A coated article comprising: a substrate; and a coating on the substrate including at least a first layer, wherein the first layer comprises: a matrix; and a filler at 2.0% to 40% by volume in the first layer, the filler having a melting point of 1450° C. to 2100° C. and having a 20° C. hardness of 3.8 to 5.2 mohs.

22. The coated article of claim 21 wherein: the matrix comprises at least 50% by volume one or more rare earth silicates.

23. (canceled)

24. A method for manufacturing a coated article, the coated article comprising: a substrate; and a coating on the substrate including at least a first layer, the method comprising: co-spraying: a matrix-forming powder; a filler powder selected from: alkaline earth or transition metal (M) tungstates (MWO.sub.4); alkaline earth molybdates (MMoO.sub.4); rare earth (RE) phosphates (REPO.sub.4); and combinations thereof; and a fugitive powder; and heating to remove the fugitive.

25. The method of claim 24 wherein one or more of: the method comprises applying a bond coat prior to the spraying; the spraying is dry powder; and the matrix-forming powder and filler powder are pre-blended.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0038] FIG. 1 is a sectional view of an abradable/abrasive interaction in a gas turbine engine.

[0039] FIG. 1A is an enlarged view of an abradable coating.

[0040] FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a further abradable/abrasive interaction in a gas turbine engine.

[0041] Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0042] FIG. 1 shows a coated article 20 comprising a substrate 22 and a coating system 24 atop a surface 26 of the substrate and extending to an outer surface 28. The example substrate is a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) such as a SiC—SiC composite (see the '789 publication) or a monolithic ceramic. The coating system 24 includes an abradable layer (abradable coating) 30. The example FIG. 1 coating system includes a bond coat 32 directly atop the substrate surface. The bond coat is optional. However, further variations may include additional layers. FIG. 2 shows an additional layer 64 (in a coating system 62 of a coated article 60 otherwise similar to coated article 20) in addition to or alternatively to the bond coat 32 and which may serve as a barrier layer.

[0043] The article 20 interfaces with a second article 36 comprising a substrate 38 and a coating system 40 atop a surface 42 of the substrate and extending to an outer surface 44. The example substrate 38 is a metallic substrate such as a nickel-based superalloy. The coating system 40 includes an abrasive layer (abrasive coating) 46. The example coating system 40 includes a bond coat 48 directly atop the substrate surface. An example abrasive layer comprises a cubic boron nitride (cBN) abrasive in a metallic (e.g., MCrAlY) matrix. An example abrasive layer application is via electrolytic deposition (plating) of the metal (M-Ni and/or Co and/or Fe) with the addition of the abrasive (e.g., cBN) particles and with or without the addition of metal particles (e.g., the CrAlY) required in order to achieve an alloyed matrix. An example bond coat 48 is Ni (e.g., essentially pure such as at least 95.0% or at least 99.0% Ni by weight). An example Ni bond coat application is via electrolytic deposition.

[0044] In one group of examples, the first article 20 is a blade outer airseal (BOAS) or segment thereof with the surfaces 26 and 28 being inner diameter (ID) surfaces. The second article 36 is a blade of a blade stage with the surfaces 42 and 44 being tip/outer diameter (OD) surfaces.

[0045] The abradable layer 30 comprises a matrix 50 (FIG. 1A) and a filler 52. The abradable layer may further include unfilled porosity 54. The example matrix comprises one or more rare earth, hafnium (Hf), or zirconium (Zr) silicates, where the rare earths are cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), holmium (Ho), lanthanum (La), lutetium (Lu), neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), promethium (Pm), samarium (Sm), scandium (Sc), terbium (Tb), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), and yttrium (Y). Hafnium, zirconium and rare earths form stable silicate compounds. Hafnium and zirconium have different reactivates than rare earths which may influence the selection of hafnium or zirconium for a particular application. Particular candidate matrix materials are ytterbium silicates such as ytterbium monosilicate (Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5), ytterbium disilicate (Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7), hafnium monosilicate (HfSiO.sub.4), yttrium monosilicate (Y.sub.2SiO.sub.5), and combinations thereof. These are advantageous because the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of these materials are similar to SiC—SiC composites, which promotes coating durability during engine operation. Yttrium disilicate (Y.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7) has four stable crystal structures at different temperatures, with phase changes potentially causing cracking. A more specific matrix example involves a sprayed ytterbium disilicate (Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7) where silicon attrition has converted a minority (e.g., 5.0-20.0% by weight to monosilicate). Hafnium monosilicate (also simply called hafnium silicate) may perform more like ytterbium disilicate than it does ytterbium monosilicate due to the nominal 1:1 ratio of Hf to Si.

[0046] An alternative matrix 50 is zirconium monosilicate (ZrSiO.sub.4). This is useful because the zirconium, like hafnium, may be less reactive with bond coat materials than the ytterbium. Again, these may be pure, essentially pure (e.g., subject to inevitable or commercial impurities, silicon attrition, and the like), or may have intentional additions. Relative to Hf, Zr oxides from the zirconium monosilicate may have a greater tendency to produce cracking and thus be less desirable. Example impurities in matrix and filler combined are no greater than 5.0 weight percent overall for the barrier or abradable coating.

[0047] The filler 52 is selected to act as a dislocator in the matrix. The '497 publication uses very hard dislocator particles with shear strength exceeding the matrix, presumably creating a mechanical mismatch that will aid abradability within the matrix or solely along the matrix-dislocator interfaces. These nitride, carbide, and diboride phases have poor oxidation/volatilization resistance, potentially attritting in high temperature and/or highly oxidative conditions.

[0048] In contrast to the '497 publication, the dislocator 52 is selected to have a different relationship to the matrix. For example, the dislocator 52 may have a lower shear strength than the matrix to aid abradability through deformation within the dislocator phase in addition to along the interfaces. For example CaWO.sub.4 as a dislocator addition has a lower shear strength than ytterbium disilicate, resulting in a composite coating with shear strength below monolithic ytterbium disilicate and hence reducing the work required for abrasion during engine rub. The lower shear strength is correlated with lower melting temperature and lower hardness (see Table I discussed below). For a given abradability, the use of a dislocator reduces open porosity relative to an abradable consisting of the matrix and open porosity. This reduces opportunity for gas or other penetration toward the substrate.

[0049] The dislocator 52 may have a melting temperature effective to allow thermal spray codeposition with the matrix but sufficiently high to retain structural stability during operation in a gas turbine. Due to the deformability, candidate materials will likely have melting temperatures less than those of the '497 publication (e.g., up to somewhat over 2070° C. for the example of LaPO.sub.4 (e.g., up to about 2500° C. or 2600° C.). Example dislocator melting points are within 500° C. of (not more than 500° C. from) the melting points of the matrix (e.g., of at least a majority by weight of the matrix or at least 75% by weight or at least 90% by weight), more narrowly within 400° C. or within 300° C.

[0050] Candidate dislocators are alkaline earth or transition metal (M) tungstates (MWO.sub.4), alkaline earth molybdates (MMoO.sub.4), or rare earth (RE) phosphates (REPO.sub.4) where particular candidate alkaline earths are Mg, Ca, Sr and Ba; particular candidate transition metals are Zn, Cd, Ni, and Co; and particular candidate rare earths are La and Y. These particular candidates are chosen based on published melting temperature above 2500° F. (1371° C.) and resistance to oxidation/degradation are shown in Table I below. Candidate 20° C. hardness is 3.6 to 5.4 moh, more particularly 3.8 to 5.2 moh.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Dislocator Properties Hardness (room Melting temp Temperature 20° C.) Vapor Pressure Dislocator ° C. ° F. moh atm Species atm Species CaWO.sub.4 1650 3002 4.8*  8.54E−08 Ca(OH).sub.2 3.68E−07 WO.sub.2(OH).sub.2 BaWO.sub.4 1475 2687 4-5** 3.09E−08 Ba(OH).sub.2 3.09E−08 WO.sub.2(OH).sub.2 ZnWO.sub.4 1875 3407  4-4.5# 6.21E−05 Zn 2.79E−04 WO.sub.2(OH).sub.2 BaMoO.sub.4 1450 2642 3-4## 5.21E−06 Ba(OH).sub.2 5.21E−06 MoO.sub.2(OH).sub.2 SrMoO.sub.4 1490 2714 4### 1.43E−06 Sr(OH).sub.2 1.43E−06 MoO.sub.2(OH).sub.2 YPO.sub.4 1995 3623 4-5{circumflex over ( )}  3.35E−15 Y(OH).sub.3 1.03E−02 P.sub.2O.sub.5 LaPO.sub.4 2070 3758 5{circumflex over ( )}{circumflex over ( )}  2.87E−11 La(OH).sub.3 1.03E−02 P.sub.2O.sub.5 *MatWeb Ceramics Material Data Sheets (MDS); **CRC Handbook of Metal Etchants; #Belli, P. et al., “Radioactive contamination of ZnWO.sub.4 crystal scintillators”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Jan. 11-21, 2011, pp. 31-38, Vols. 626-627, Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.10.027; ##Arora, S. K., Rao, G. T. and Batra, N. M., 1984. Vickers micromechanical indentation of BaMoO 4 crystals. Journal of materials science, January, 1984, pp. 297-302. Vol. 19(1), Springer Nature, Berlin Germany (Vickers hardness at 100 g ranges between 80 and 150 kg/mm.sup.2 - converts to a mohs hardness between 3 and 4); ###“Barium & Strontium tungstate-molybdate - CRYSTALS FOR RAMAN SHIFT”, EKSMA Optics, UAB, June, 2019, Vilnius, Lithuania http://eksmaoptics.com/out/media/EKSMA_Optics_Crystals_for_Raman_Shift.pdf; {circumflex over ( )}Mogilevsky, P., Zaretsky, E. B., Parthasarathy, T. A. et al., “Composition, lattice parameters, and room temperature elastic constants of natural single crystal xenotime from Novo Horizonte”, Phys Chem Minerals, Nov. 3, 2006, pp. 691-698 Vol. 33, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-006-0118-6; {circumflex over ( )}{circumflex over ( )}Peter E. D. Morgan, David B. Marshall, Robert M. Housley, “High-temperature stability of monazite-alumina composites”, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Jun. 1, 1995, pp. 215-222, Vol. 195, Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(94)06521-7

[0051] Candidate matrix materials are shown in Table II:

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II Matrix Melting temperatures Melting Temperature Matrix ° C. ° F. Y.sub.2SiO.sub.5 1975 3587 Y.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 1800 3272 Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 1950 3542 Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 1850 3362 ZrSiO.sub.4 1675 3047 HfSiO.sub.4 1750 3182

[0052] The calculated vapor pressure of gaseous species in equilibrium with the dislocator and a gas mixture of 0.2 atm 02 and 0.1 atm H.sub.2O at 1371° C. For a compound of the form ABO.sub.x, the highest vapor pressure species associated with A and B are listed in the table. These are contrasted with hBN (sublimation temperature of 3552° C.) where the highest vapor pressure species are BO(OH) with a vapor pressure of 3.7×10.sup.−3 atm and HBO with a vapor pressure of 7.3×10.sup.−4 atm under the identified test condition. The melting points are about 1000° C. less than hafnium diboride at 3250° C. and tantalum nitride at 3090° C. An example melting point range is 1000° C. to 2500° C., more narrowly 1450° C. to 2100° C.

[0053] From a vapor pressure perspective, CaWO.sub.4, BaWO.sub.4, BaMoO.sub.4, and SrMoO.sub.4 are favorable candidates.

[0054] Particular dislocator examples based on commercial availability and demonstrated properties are CaWO.sub.4, LaPO.sub.4, and YPO.sub.4. Commercial sources of CaWO.sub.4 (scheelite) and associated data on deformability are readily available. BaWO.sub.4, ZnWO.sub.4, BaMoO.sub.4, and SrMoO.sub.4 all share the same crystal structure as CaWO.sub.4 and are chemically similar, likely offering similar properties including low hardness. YPO.sub.4 and LaPO.sub.4 offer similarly low hardness as the tungstate and molybdate chemistries above but with a slightly higher melting temperature and a different crystal structure which could improve rub response. LaPO.sub.4 and YPO.sub.4 are, thus, particularly promising for higher temperature turbine sections (e.g., the first stage of the turbine (high pressure turbine in a multi-spool engine)). The CaWO.sub.4 melting point is also relatively close to likely matrix melting points (contrasted with the Ba and Sr compounds) to provide favorable co-spray. YPO.sub.4 and LaPO.sub.4 are both rare-earth orthophosphate that have demonstrated low shear strengths. These are available in various purities as xenotime-(Y) and monazite-(La), respectively.

[0055] In a first group of examples, the substrate 22 is a SiC/SiC ceramic matrix composite substrate. Optionally, the bond coat 32 (if present) and/or an environmental barrier coating (EBC) layer 64 (FIG. 2, if present) may intervene between the substrate 22 and the abradable layer 30. The bond coat 32, when present, may include silicon. Example bond coats 32 include those having a barium-magnesium-alumino-silicate (BMAS) matrix and dispersed particles of silicon oxycarbide (e.g., as described in US Patent Publication No. 2016/0332922A1 (the '922 publication, of Tang et al., published Nov. 17, 2016, and entitled “SILICON OXYCARBIDE ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATING”), silicon oxycarbide (e.g., as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0328886A1 (the '886 publication, of Schmidt et al., published Dec. 27, 2012 and entitled “COMPOSITE ARTICLE INCLUDING SILICON OXYCARBIDE LAYER”), and a combination of silicon oxycarbide and calcium magnesium alumino silicate (CMAS) (e.g., as described in in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0333454A1 (the '454 publication), of Tang et al., published Nov. 17, 2016, and entitled “SILICON OXYCARBIDE-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATING”), the disclosures of which '922, '886, and '454 publications are incorporated by reference in their entireties herein as if set forth at length.

[0056] The example bond coat may be applied by slurry deposition. Alterative techniques include air plasma spray. The bond coat may oxidize in service to form a silicon oxide layer positioned between the bond coat and the layer above it (either the top coat or the multi-phase abradable coating). The bond coat may have a thickness of 2.0 to 15.0 mils (0.051 to 0.38 mm), or, more specifically, 5.0 to 10.0 mils (0.13 to 0.25 mm). The bond coat may have a porosity of 0 to 20%, or, more specifically, 1.0 to 10.0% or 1.0 to 5.0%.

[0057] Example EBC materials are the matrix 50 candidates disclosed herein. In one group of examples, the EBC is applied from a source of the same matrix material used in the abradable (e.g., but with no or less fugitive and/or dislocator). Similar application techniques may be used. Or the EBC and matrix may be different. One particular example of the EBC is HfSiO.sub.4. HfSiO.sub.4 may be particularly relevant for use with matrices other than HfSiO.sub.4. because it is less reactive with bond coat material than are the rare earth silicates. The EBC may have a thickness of 1 to 10 mils (0.025 to 0.25 mm), or, more specifically, 2 to 7 mils (0.051 to 0.18 mm). The EBC may have a porosity of 0 to 20%, or, more specifically, 1 to 5%.

[0058] An abradable coating layer is deposited on top of the bond coat (if present or EBC if present) by thermal spray such as air plasma spray (APS), suspension plasma spray (SPS), or the like. One particular example of an abradable coating layer is fabricated using a combination of ytterbium disilicate (Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7) matrix input powder, polyester fugitive input powder, and a calcium tungstate (CaWO.sub.4) dislocator input powder. In this example the polyester fugitive powder comprises 10% by volume of the input powder, the calcium tungstate powder comprises 20% by volume of the input powder, and the ytterbium disilicate powder comprises the balance. A broader range of fugitive is 0 to 30% by volume or 5.0% to 30.0% or 5.0% to 20.0% and a broader range of dislocator is 2.0% to 40% or 5.0% to 30% or 10.0% to 25.0%. Matrix may be an example at least 40% or an at least 50% (e.g., 40% to 70%). The as-sprayed layer may consist of or consist essentially of the matrix, fugitive, and dislocator. There may be impurities or even intended additions.

[0059] The ytterbium disilicate (Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7) may be converted partially into a combination of ytterbium monosilicate (Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5) and silica (SiO.sub.2) during the air plasma spray process. The calcium tungstate (CaWO.sub.4) maybe converted partially into calcium oxide (CaO) and tungstate (WO.sub.3) during the air plasma spray process. The ytterbium disilicate (Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7) matrix input powder, the polyester input powder, and the calcium tungstate (CaWO.sub.4) dislocator input powder may be blended together into a single composite powder before spray, into any pairwise combination composite powders, or may be injected separately into the air plasma spray plume. The resulting abradable layer may be between 0.010 inch and 0.080 inch thick (0.25 mm to 2.0 mm). The resulting abradable may have a porosity similar to the fugitive volume percentage.

[0060] In a second group of examples, the substrate is metallic (e.g., a single crystal metallic Ni superalloy produced by casting). An MCrAlY bond coat is applied on top of the substrate by thermal spray (e.g., air plasma spray); the bond coat thickness may be between 0.002 inch and 0.020 inch (0.051 mm to 0.51 mm). The abradable coating layer comprises a stabilized zirconia (yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) and/or gadolinia-stabilized zirconia (GSZ GdZ or GZO) and a dislocator applied by thermal spray (e.g., air plasma spray). Example spray feedstock comprises a mixture of yttria stabilized zirconia (e.g., 7-20 weight percent yttria)) matrix input powder, polyester fugitive input powder, and a calcium tungstate (CaWO.sub.4) dislocator input powder. Volume percentages may be similar to the first group of examples.

[0061] The calcium tungstate (CaWO.sub.4) may be converted partially into calcium oxide (CaO) and tungstate (WO.sub.3) during the air plasma spray process. The yttria stabilized zirconia matrix input powder, the polyester input powder, and the calcium tungstate (CaWO.sub.4) dislocator input powder may be blended together into a single composite powder before spray, into any pairwise combination composite powders, or may be injected separately into the air plasma spray plume. The resulting abradable layer may be between 0.010 inch and 0.080 inch thick (0.25 mm to 2.0 mm).

[0062] In an example of the abrasive coating, the substrate 38 (e.g., blade substrate) is metallic (e.g., a Ni superalloy produced by casting). A bond coat of Ni electroplated from a Watts Ni solution is applied to a thickness of between 0.0001 inch and 0.002 inch resulting in a layer with >95% pure Ni containing trace impurities of Co, Fe, and other transition metals.

[0063] An abrasive layer matrix is deposited on top of the bond coat; the abrasive layer matrix is a NiCrAlY coating produced by electrodeposition of Ni from a Ni-sulfamate solution with suspended particles of CrAlY which are subsequently entrapped in the coating during plating and diffused to form an alloy in a post-plating heat treat. Also entrapped in the matrix coating are cubic boron nitride (cBN) abrasive particles.

[0064] Alternative second members 36 may comprise CMC or monolithic ceramic substrates (e.g., CMC blades with or without abrasive or hard coating).

[0065] Further coating examples are shown in Table III:

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE III Coating Combinations Bond coat Abradable Example Substrate Material Method Matrix Filler Fugitive Method Other 1 SiC—SiC Si EB-PVD Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 CaWO.sub.4 polyester SPS 2 SiC—SiC Si APS Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 CaWO.sub.4 polyester SPS 3 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS 4 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS APS HfSiO.sub.4 EBC 5 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS APS HfSiO.sub.4 EBC 6 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry HfSiO.sub.4 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS 7 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Y.sub.2SiO.sub.5 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS APS HfSiO.sub.4 EBC 8 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS 9 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 BaMoO.sub.4 polyester APS 10 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 BaMoO.sub.4 polyester APS APS HfSiO.sub.4 EBC 11 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 BaMoO.sub.4 polyester APS 12 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 YPO.sub.4 polyester APS 13 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry HfSiO4 CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS APS HfSiO.sub.4 EBC 14 SiC—SiC SiOC-BMAS Slurry Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 CaWO.sub.4 PMMA APS 15 Ni superalloy MCrAlY APS 7YSZ CaWO.sub.4 polyester APS 16 Ni superalloy MCrAlY APS 7YSZ YPO.sub.4 polyester APS 17 Ni superalloy MCrAlY APS 7YSZ BaMoO.sub.4 polyester APS

[0066] The Table III examples are non-limiting and further examples may be provided by alternatively mixing layers or components from those examples or from elsewhere in the disclosure. In an example application method, air plasma spray is used to spray a pre-blended mixture of matrix powder(s) and dislocator powder(s), and optionally the fugitive. Fugitive introduction may be separate due to extremely lower melting point and related concerns (e.g., introduced relatively downstream or to a cooler region of the plasma). As noted above, a particular example of separate introduction of matrix and dislocator is where the matrix material alone is used for an EBC layer and it is not desired to switch out sources or switch spray apparatus.

[0067] Regarding Table III Ex. 1 and 2, APS is less expensive than EB-PVD and would be used to deposit Si in most cases. Regarding Ex. 5 and 8, if no additional EBC layer is used, Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 may be more useful than Yb.sub.2SiO.sub.5 because the CTE is lower and therefore a thicker coating can be used (similar for Ex. 10 and 11).

[0068] Example dislocator particle size measured as a powder (e.g., D50) is 10 micrometers to 100 micrometers, more narrowly 15 micrometers to 45 micrometers or about 25 micrometers. Example porosity size measured in the deposited coating (e.g., measured by/as area fraction of porosity in cross section images of the as-deposited coating) is 1.0 micrometer to 100 micrometers, more narrowly 5.0 micrometers to 25 micrometers.

[0069] In addition to use in abradable coating systems, the dislocators may be used in machinable coating systems. Machinable coating systems are used, for example, on the contact faces of turbine components. One example is along the root of a blade that is slid into a rotor or disk. In a machinable coating system, the dislocators may function to enable removal of the coating from the as-deposited thickness to fit specific dimensions.

[0070] An example of use of the dislocator 52 in a machinable coating is CaWO.sub.4 dislocators in an Yb.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.7 matrix. The addition of a dislocator to the matrix improves machinability in the same way that the dislocators improve abradability of the abradable coatings. The improved machinability is associated with lower tool loads, lower heat generation, and as a result improved surface quality and lower propensity for cracking and failure during machining.

[0071] The use of “first”, “second”, and the like in the following claims is for differentiation within the claim only and does not necessarily indicate relative or absolute importance or temporal order. Similarly, the identification in a claim of one element as “first” (or the like) does not preclude such “first” element from identifying an element that is referred to as “second” (or the like) in another claim or in the description.

[0072] Where a measure is given in English units followed by a parenthetical containing SI or other units, the parenthetical's units are a conversion and should not imply a degree of precision not found in the English units.

[0073] One or more embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. For example, when applied to an existing baseline configuration, details of such baseline may influence details of particular implementations. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.