NON-MAGNETIC STAINLESS STEEL WITH HIGH STRENGTH AND SUPERIOR CORROSION RESISTANCE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF

Abstract

The present invention provides a non-magnetic stainless steel with high strength and corrosion resistance and a preparation method thereof. The non-magnetic stainless steel composed of the following components according to percentage by weight: 17%<Cr<23%, 17%<Mn<23%, 17%<Co<23%, 0.5%<Si <3%, and the balance of iron and inevitable impurities thereof. The preparation method includes: (1) melting a raw material and casting it to a mold to obtain a stainless steel block; (2) homogenizing the stainless steel block at 1,100-1,250° C. for 6-12 hours; (3) forging the homogenized stainless steel block at 1,050-1,150° C. with a final forging temperature of 850-950° C. to obtain a plate having a thickness of 5-15 mm; and (4) holding the forged plate at 1,000-1,250° C. for 10-30 minutes and then put it in water for quenching. The non-magnetic stainless steel of the present invention has superior pitting corrosion resistance and mechanical properties. After a certain heat treatment process, the stainless steel has ultrahigh strength, hardness and toughness and excellent corrosion resistance and low-temperature toughness, and can be used for preparing an outer cladding material of a superconductor in the nuclear fusion industry.

Claims

1. A non-magnetic stainless steel composed of the following components according to percentage by weight: 17%<Cr<23%, 17%<Mn<23%, 17%<Co<23%, 0.5%<Si<3%, and the balance of iron and inevitable impurities thereof.

2. The non-magnetic stainless steel according to claim 1, wherein the non-magnetic stainless steel is composed of the following components according to percentage by weight: 19%<Cr<21%, 17%<Mn<19%, 19%<Co<21%, 1%<Si<2%, and the balance of the iron and inevitable impurities thereof.

3. The non-magnetic stainless steel according to claim 1, wherein the non-magnetic stainless steel has a yield strength of 500-600 Mpa and a tensile strength of 1,000-1,100 Mpa.

4. The non-magnetic stainless steel according to claim 1, wherein the non-magnetic stainless steel has a ductility of 55-65%.

5. The non-magnetic stainless steel according to claim 1, wherein the non-magnetic stainless steel has a pitting potential of greater than 1,050 mV.

6. A method for preparing a non-magnetic stainless steel, comprising the following steps: (1) melting a raw material and casting it to a mold to obtain a stainless steel block, where the raw material is composed of the following components according to percentage by weight: 17%<Cr<23%, 17%<Mn<23%, 17%<Co<23%, 0.5%<Si<3%, and the balance of iron and inevitable impurities; (2) homogenizing the stainless steel block at 1,100-1,250° C. for 6-12 hours; (3) forging the homogenized stainless steel block at 1,050-1,150° C. with a final forging temperature of 850-950° C. to obtain a plate having a thickness of 5-15 mm; and (4) holding the forged plate at 1,000-1,250° C. for 10-30 minutes and then put it in water for quenching to obtain the non-magnetic stainless steel.

7. The preparation method according to claim 6, wherein the raw material is composed of the following components according to percentage by weight: 19%<Cr<21%, 17%<Mn<19%, 19%<Co<21%, 1% <Si<2%, and the balance of the iron and inevitable impurities thereof.

8. The preparation method according to claim 7, wherein step (1) comprises putting the raw material in a vacuum induction melting furnace for melting.

9. The preparation method according to claim 7, wherein step (2) comprises putting the stainless steel block in a vacuum heat treatment furnace for homogenization.

10. The preparation method according to claim 7, wherein the non-magnetic stainless steel has a yield strength of 500-600 Mpa and a tensile strength of 1,000-1,100 Mpa; preferably, the non-magnetic stainless steel has a ductility of 55-65%; and preferably, the non-magnetic stainless steel has a pitting potential of greater than 1,050 mV.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0029] The embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to accompanying drawings, in which:

[0030] FIG. 1 is an XRD diagram of a non-magnetic stainless steel prepared in Example 1 of the present invention;

[0031] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing comparison of results of the engineering stress-engineering strain of the stainless steel block before rolling and the stainless steel plate after rolling in Example 1 of the present invention;

[0032] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing comparison of results of a corrosion test of the stainless steel block before rolling and the stainless steel plate after rolling in Example 1 of the present invention, and a 316L stainless steel;

[0033] FIG. 4 shows comparison of the surface morphology of the stainless steel block before rolling and the stainless steel plate after rolling in Example 1 of the present invention, and a 316L stainless steel after a corrosion test; and

[0034] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing comparison of the stainless steel block in Example 1 of the present invention and a selected superalloy after corrosion at constant potential.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0035] The present invention is further described below with reference to embodiments. The embodiments are intended only for explanations, and should not be construed to limit the scope of the present invention in any manner.

Example 1

[0036] In this example, a non-magnetic stainless steel and a preparation method thereof in the present invention are exemplarily illustrated.

[0037] (1) A raw material is put in a vacuum induction melting furnace for melting, and subjected to casting to a mold to obtain a stainless steel block, where the raw material having the following composition according to percentage by weight: 20.73% of Cr, 17.7% of Mn, 20.2% of Co, 1.7% of Si, and the balance of iron and inevitable impurities.

[0038] (2) After the molding, the stainless steel block is put in a vacuum heat treatment furnace for heat preservation at 1,200° C. for 7 hours to allow thorough homogenization of alloy elements.

[0039] (3) After the homogenization, the block is subjected to high-temperature forging at an initial forging temperature of about 1,150° C. and a final forging temperature of about 900° C. to obtain a plate with a thickness of about 10 mm and a geometrical size of 200 mm×100 mm×10 mm.

[0040] (4) After the forging, the plate is subjected to heat preservation at 1,200° C. for 20 minutes, and then put in water for quenching to obtain a non-magnetic stainless steel of the present invention.

[0041] Performance Characterization

[0042] Preparation of a material generally includes the following processes: melting of a raw material, casting to a mold, high-temperature homogenization, forging, heat treatment (that is, a sample before rolling), and rolling (the rolling capacity is 50% of a thickness of the raw material). The non-magnetic stainless steel in Example 1 is sampled after heat treatment and after rolling separately to carry out tests on mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. According to the corrosion resistance tested after the rolling, it is indicated that the material still has great corrosion resistance after a large number of deformations (dislocations) are introduced.

[0043] The corrosion resistance of the material is measured by using a three-electrode method. The stainless steel is used as a working electrode, a saturated calomel electrode is used as a reference electrode, a platinum sheet electrode is used as an auxiliary electrode, and a 3.5 wt. % of NaCl olution is used as a corrosive medium. The test is carried out at room temperature at a sample test area of 1 cm2 and a scanning rate of 3 mV/s. Specific operations are as follows. The non-magnetic stainless steel of the present invention is machined into a sample with a size of 10 mm×10 mm×3 mm. Each surface of the sample is preliminarily polished with P360 abrasive paper and P600 abrasive paper. The polished sample is passivated in 30% of nitric acid for 1 hour. A 10 mm×10 mm surface of the sample is connected to a copper wire. After ensuring its conductivity, the sample is encapsulated and cured with epoxy resin. The other 10 mm×10 mm surface of the sample is polished with P360 abrasive paper, P600 abrasive paper, P1000 abrasive paper, P1500 abrasive paper, P2000 abrasive paper, and P4000 abrasive paper in sequence to obtain a mirror surface. After being washed with acetone and ethanol and dried, the polished sample is subjected to an electrochemical corrosion test.

[0044] Analysis of the Results

[0045] FIG. 1 is an XRD diagram of a non-magnetic stainless steel prepared in Example 1. According to FIG. 1, it is shown that after the heat treatment process provided in the present invention, the stainless steel having the compositions of the present invention has an all -austenitic single-phase structure.

[0046] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing comparison of results of the engineering stress-engineering strain of a stainless steel block before rolling and a stainless steel plate after rolling in Example 1 of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing comparison of results of a corrosion test of a stainless steel block before rolling and a stainless steel plate after rolling in Example 1 of the present invention, and 316L stainless steel. FIG. 4 shows comparison of the surface morphology of a stainless steel block before rolling and a stainless steel plate after rolling in Example 1 of the present invention, and 316L stainless steel after a corrosion test.

[0047] The stainless steel of Example 1 has excellent mechanical properties. As shown in FIG. 2, the yield strength and the tensile strength are 533 Mpa and 1,022 Mpa, respectively, both of which are greater than twice those of commercial 316L stainless steel. Moreover, at such high strength, the ductility of the stainless steel of the example is not reduced and can reach 60%, which is equal to or slightly better than that of the commercial 316L stainless steel. From FIG. 3, it can be known that the corrosion potential and the corrosion current are equivalent to those of the commercial 316L stainless steel. This is because both of the stainless steels are alloys with Fe as a substrate and have similar standard electrode potentials. Although experiments show that the polarization current of the stainless steel of Example 1 is suddenly increased at a potential of about 1,021 mV, this current change is not induced by pitting corrosion of the surface of the stainless steel, but is induced by an oxygen evolution reaction. Thus, it can be inferred that the pitting potential of the stainless steel of Example 1 is greater than 1,021 mV, which is much greater than that of the 316L stainless steel (330 mV). This phenomenon indicates that an oxide film different from that on the 316L stainless steel is formed on the surface of the stainless steel of Example 1, and it plays a stronger role in protecting the material from Cl-ions.

[0048] From FIG. 2, it can be seen that after rolling (the rolling capacity is 50% of a thickness of the raw material), the stainless steel in the example has a yield strength of 1,700 Mpa, but the corrosion resistance is equivalent to that of the sample before rolling, as shown in FIG. 3. The corrosion potential of the sample after rolling in the example and the corrosion potential of the sample without rolling are basically equivalent, being −420 mV and −400 mV, respectively. However, the pitting potential of the sample after rolling is slightly higher than that of the sample before rolling, indicating that the grain refinement and the introduction of a large number of dislocations have little influence on the corrosion resistance of the sample of the example. Moreover, whether rolled or not, the pitting corrosion resistance of the sample of the example is still far superior to that of the commercial 316L stainless steel. As shown in FIG. 4, when the test potential is up to 3,000 mV, pitting corrosion does not occur on the surface of the sample before and after rolling in the example. However, the surface of the commercial 316L stainless steel is seriously corroded.

[0049] The superior corrosion resistance of the non-magnetic stainless steel is further tested by polarization at constant potential of 1,500 mV for 10 minutes in comparisons with some representative superalloys, such as 254SMO super stainless steel, Inconel 718 (In-718), Inconel 625 (In-625), C-276, and C-22 nickel-based superalloy. The experimental results not only verifies that the stainless steel of Example 1 does not undergo pitting corrosion at 1021 mV (kinetic potential scan), but it is further found that it also did not undergo overpassivation corrosion. Under conventional test conditions, pitting corrosion does not occur on all of the comparative superalloys. However, when the potential is too high, overpassivation corrosion results due to further oxidation of Cr.sup.3+ in the passivation film to soluble Cr.sup.6+. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 5, all comparative superalloys corrode to varying degrees under high potential conditions 1500 mV, while the test surface of the sample of Example 1 is remained intact.

[0050] The foregoing descriptions are merely preferred embodiments of the present invention, which are not intended to limit the present invention. Any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.