MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR MAKING SEXUAL STAGE PLASMODIUM PARASITES

Abstract

This document relates to sexual stage Plasmodium parasites. For example, Plasmodium parasites having (e.g., engineered to have) a regulatable AP2-G polypeptide that can be induced to enter the sexual stage are provided

Claims

1. A Plasmodium parasite, wherein the genome of said Plasmodium parasite comprises: (a) exogenous nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide, and (b) at least one disrupted pairing element, wherein said disrupted pairing element comprises a disruption in a pairing element flanking said nucleic acid encoding said AP2-G polypeptide fused to said nucleic acid encoding said destabilization domain.

2. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said Plasmodium parasite is selected from the group consisting of a Plasmodium falciparum, a P. berghei, a P. voelii, a P. vivax, a P. malariae, a P. ovale, and a P. knowlesi.

3. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said Plasmodium parasite is a P. falciparum.

4. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said destabilization domain comprises a FKBP destabilization domain.

5. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said destabilization domain comprises a glmS ribozyme.

6. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said exogenous nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain comprises nucleic acid encoding a peptide tag.

7. (canceled)

8. (canceled)

9. (canceled)

10. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said disrupted pairing element is a 5′ pairing element.

11. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein said disrupted pairing element is a 3′ pairing element.

12. The Plasmodium parasite of claim 1, wherein the genome of said Plasmodium parasite comprises a disrupted 5′ pairing element and a disrupted 3′ pairing element.

13. A method for generating a sexual stage Plasmodium parasite, wherein said method comprises administering a ligand to a Plasmodium parasite comprising a regulatable AP2-G polypeptide, wherein the genome of said Plasmodium parasite comprises: (a) exogenous nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide, and (b) at least one disrupted pairing element, wherein said disrupted pairing element comprises a disruption in a pairing element flanking said nucleic acid encoding said AP2-G polypeptide fused to said nucleic acid encoding said destabilization domain; wherein said ligand stabilizes said destabilization domain, and wherein said stabilization is effective to increase the level of AP2-G polypeptide present within the Plasmodium parasite.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein said Plasmodium parasite is selected from the group consisting of a Plasmodium falciparum, a P. berghei, a P. voelii, a P. vivax, a P. malariae, a P. ovale, and a P. knowlesi.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein said Plasmodium parasite is a P. falciparum.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein said destabilization domain comprises a FKBP destabilization domain.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein said ligand is a Shield-1 (Shld1) molecule.

18. The method of claim 13, wherein said destabilization domain comprises a glmS ribozyme.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein said ligand is N-acetyl glucosamine.

20. The method of claim 13, wherein said exogenous nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain comprises nucleic acid encoding a peptide tag.

21. (canceled)

22. (canceled)

23. (canceled)

24. The method of claim 13, wherein said disrupted pairing element is a 5′ pairing element.

25. The method of claim 13, wherein said disrupted pairing element is a 3′ pairing element.

26. The method of claim 13, wherein the genome of said Plasmodium parasite comprises a disrupted 5′ pairing element and a disrupted 3′ pairing element.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] FIG. 1: Conditional knockdown of a PfAP2-G polypeptide. The FKBP destabilization domain can be used to conditionally deplete PfAP2-G polypeptides in the absence of Shield 1 (Sh1d1), while the presence of Shld1 stabilizes the FKBP-tagged PfAP2-G polypeptide leading to gametocyte production.

[0016] FIG. 2: The locations and sequences of an exemplary 5′ pairing element (SEQ ID NO:1) and an exemplary 3′ pairing element (SEQ ID NO:2) flanking the pfap2-g locus. Also shown is a motif of the pairing element (SEQ ID NO:3).

[0017] FIG. 3: An exemplary mutation of the 3′ pfap2-g pairing element (SEQ ID NO:4) by CRISPR/Cas9 (top). Bottom is the wild type sequence (SEQ ID NO:5).

[0018] FIG. 4: Mutation of the 3′ pfap2-g pairing element results in a significant increase in gametocyte commitment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0019] This document provides methods and materials for producing sexual stage Plasmodium parasites efficiently and effectively. For example, this document provides Plasmodium parasites having (e.g., engineered to have) regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression. For example, this document provides Plasmodium parasites having (e.g., engineered to have) nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide and having one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, or more) disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain). Such Plasmodium parasites can be induced to enter the sexual stage. Also provided herein are methods and materials for making and using sexual stage Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression and induced to enter the sexual stage). As described herein, Plasmodium parasites having nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide, and having one or more disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain) can be induced (e.g., in the presence of a ligand that can stabilize the destabilization domain) to commit to gametocytogenesis (e.g., can be induced to exit asexual growth cycles and enter the sexual stage).

[0020] Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can be any species of Plasmodium parasite (e.g., any Plasmodium spp.). Examples of Plasmodium spp. include, without limitation, P. falciparum, P. berghei, P. voelii, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale, and P. knowlesi.

[0021] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can use a destabilization domain to regulate AP2-G expression. For example, Plasmodium parasites can have (e.g., can be engineered to have) nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide. A nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid (e.g., the endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide can be exogenous nucleic acid. A nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide can be a recombinant nucleic acid. The term “destabilizing domain” as used herein refers to both polypeptide-based destabilizing domains and RNA-based destabilizing domains. In some cases, AP2-G polypeptide-encoding nucleic acid having nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to its 3′ end can encode an AP2-G polypeptide fused to a polypeptide-based destabilization domain (an AP2G-DD polypeptide). In some cases, AP2-G polypeptide-encoding nucleic acid having nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to its 3′ end can produce an RNA molecule (e.g., a messenger RNA (mRNA)) including an AP2-G transcript fused to an RNA-based destabilization domain. Examples of polypeptide-based destabilization domains that can be used as described herein include, without limitation, a FKBP destabilization domain (e.g., a destabilization domain derived from a FKBP polypeptide), and a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) destabilization domain (e.g., a destabilization domain derived from a DHFR polypeptide). Examples of RNA-based destabilization domains that can be used as described herein include, without limitation, a glucosamine-6-phosphate riboswitch ribozyme (glmS ribozyme), and TetR-DOZI/aptamer module. In some cases, a destabilization domain can be as described in Example 1 or Example 4. In some cases, a destabilization domain can be as described elsewhere (see, e.g., de Koning-Ward et al., Nature Reviews|Microbiology, 13:373-387 (2015); Prommana et al., PLoS One, 8(8):e73783 (2013); Muralidharanet al., PNAS, 108(11):4411-4416 (2011); and Ganesan et al., Nat. Commun., 7:10727 (2016)).

[0022] A destabilization domain can be stabilized by a ligand (e.g., an exogenous ligand).

[0023] For example, in the presence of a ligand that can target (e.g., target and bind to) the destabilization domain, an AP2G-DD polypeptide or a mRNA including an AP2-G transcript fused to an RNA-based destabilization domain can be stabilized, and gametocytes can be produced (e.g., the Plasmodium parasites commit to gametocytogenesis). However, in the absence of a ligand that can target (e.g., target and bind to) and stabilize the destabilization domain, an AP2G-DD polypeptide or a mRNA including an AP2-G transcript fused to an RNA-based destabilization domain can be unstable and degraded (e.g., targeted for proteolytic degradation), and gametocytes are not produced (e.g., the Plasmodium parasites do not commit to gametocytogenesis). When nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide has nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to its 3′ end and encodes an AP2G-DD polypeptide, the AP2G-DD polypeptide can be stable in the presence of a ligand that can target (e.g., target and bind to) the destabilization domain, and can be degraded in the absence of the ligand. When nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide has nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain fused to its 3′ end and produces a mRNA including an AP2-G transcript fused to an RNA-based destabilization domain, the AP2-G transcript fused to the RNA-based destabilization domain can be stable in the presence of a ligand that can target (e.g., target and bind to) the destabilization domain (e.g., such that an AP2-G polypeptide is encoded by the mRNA), and that transcript can be degraded in the absence of the ligand.

[0024] A ligand that can stabilize a destabilization domain described herein can be any appropriate ligand. Examples of destabilization domain ligands that can be used as described herein include, without limitation, (a) a Shld1 molecule when using a FKBP destabilization domain, (b) N-acetyl glucosamine when using a glmS ribozyme destabilization domain, (c) trimethoprim when using a DHFR destabilization domain; and (d) anhydrous tetracycline when using a TetR-DOZI/aptamer module. For example, when a polypeptide-based destabilization domain is a FKBP destabilization domain, the destabilization domain (e.g., a destabilization domain on an AP2G-DD polypeptide) can be stabilized by a Shld1 molecule. For example, when an RNA-based destabilization domain is a glmS ribozyme, the glmS ribozyme (e.g., a glmS ribozyme on an AP2-G transcript) can be stabilized (e.g., stabilized and activated) by N-acetyl glucosamine.

[0025] In some cases, nucleic acid encoding a tag can be fused to nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide (e.g., can be fused to the 3′ end of endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide). Nucleic acid encoding a tag can be exogenous nucleic acid. Nucleic acid encoding a tag can be recombinant nucleic acid. A tag can be any appropriate tag. In some cases, a tag can be a peptide tag. Examples of tags that can be fused to nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide or included with nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain that is fused to the 3′ end of nucleic acid (e.g., endogenous nucleic acid) encoding an AP2-G polypeptide described herein include, without limitation, an HA tag, a Myc-tag, a FLAG-tag a T7-tag, a FKBP destabilization domain, and a DHFR destabilization domain.

[0026] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can be designed such that an inducible expression system can be used to regulate AP2-G expression. Examples of inducible expression systems that can be used to regulate AP2-G expression in Plasmodium parasites as described herein include, without limitation, a Cre/Lox recombinase system (e.g., a CreER system that can be induced by tamoxifen), and a tetracycline (Tet) system (e.g., a Tet-On system that can be induced by tetracycline or a tetracycline derivative such as doxycycline). When a Cre/Lox recombinase system is used to regulate AP2-G expression in Plasmodium parasites, the Cre/Lox recombinase system can be designed to operably link nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide to a promoter. The term “operably linked” as used herein refers to positioning a regulatory element (e.g., a promoter sequence) relative to a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide to permit or facilitate expression of the encoded polypeptide. In the nucleic acid described herein, for example, a Cre/Lox recombinase system can be used to position a promoter sequence 5′ of nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide (e.g., the endogenous ap2-g gene) such that the promoter sequence can facilitate expression of the encoded polypeptide. A promoter sequence can be a naturally occurring promoter sequence or a recombinant promoter sequence. In some cases, a promoter sequence can be a synthetic promoter sequence. In some cases, a promoter sequence can be a constitutively active promoter sequence. In some cases, a promoter sequence can be a regulated (e.g., an inducible) promoter sequence. Examples of promoter sequences that can be operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding an AP2-G polypeptide include, without limitation, a calmodulin promoter, a hsp70 promoter, a hsp86 promoter, a hrp3 promoter, and an endogenous ap2-g promoter. For example, a Cre/Lox recombinase system can be used to operably link a nucleic acid sequence encoding an AP2-G polypeptide to a calmodulin promoter to regulate AP2-G expression. For example, a Plasmodium parasites can have (e.g., can be engineered to have) a nucleic acid including an inverted promoter (e.g., a constitutive promoter such as a calmodulin promoter) that is flanked by loxP sites located 5′ to the endogenous ap2-g locus such that the nucleic acid including a promoter flanked by loxP sites can uncouple the endogenous ap2-g gene from its native promoter, and where the presence of one or more Cre recombinase polypeptides can invert the promoter such that the promoter can drive expression of the endogenous ap2-g gene. In some cases, a Cre/Lox recombinase system can be used to regulate AP2-G expression as described elsewhere (see, e.g., Kent et al., Nat Microbiol., 3(11):1206-1213 (2018); and Llorà-Batlle et al., Sci. Adv., 6(24):eaaz5057 (2020)).

[0027] Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can have (e.g., can be engineered to have) one or more disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain). The term “reduced level” as used herein with respect to a level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus refers to any level that is lower than a reference level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus. The term “reference level” as used herein with respect to epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus refers to the level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus typically observed in Plasmodium parasites not genetically modified as described herein. In some cases, a reduced level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can be an undetectable level of epigenetic silencing. In some cases, a reduced level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can be a level where epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus is eliminated. For example, Plasmodium parasites having a reduced level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can have at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 60 percent, at least 75 percent, at least 90 percent, or at least 97 percent) less epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus as compared to control Plasmodium parasites (e.g., Plasmodium parasites not genetically modified as described herein such as wild-type Plasmodium parasites). For example, Plasmodium parasites having a reduced level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can have epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus in less than about 90 percent (e.g., less than about 80 percent, less than about 70 percent, less than about 60 percent, less than about 50 percent, less than about 40 percent, less than about 30 percent, less than about 25 percent, 25 less than about 20 percent, less than about 15 percent, less than about 10 percent, less than about 7 percent, less than about 5 percent, less than about 2 percent, or less than about 1 percent) of the cells within the Plasmodium parasites.

[0028] A level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can be measured using any appropriate technique. In some cases, a level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can be measured using chromatin immunoprecipitation (e.g., chromatin immunoprecipitation of H3K9me3 histones), and/or next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) techniques. In some cases, a level of epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus can be measured as described in Example 2.

[0029] Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can have (e.g., can be engineered to have) one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, or more) disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain). In some cases, a pairing element can be an insulator-like pairing element. In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein can have one or more disruptions in 5′ pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus. In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein can have one or more disruptions in the 3′ pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus. In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein can have one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus and can have one or more disruptions in the 3′ pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus.

[0030] Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can have (e.g., can be engineered to have) any appropriate disruption(s) in at least one pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain). In some cases, one or more disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus can be effective to reduce or eliminate epigenetic silencing of the ap2-g locus. For example, one or more disruptions in a pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus can reduce or eliminate methylation of one or more histones at the pairing element. For example, one or more disruptions in a pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus can increase acetylation of one or more histones at the pairing element. For example, one or more disruptions in a pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus can reduce or eliminate binding of one or more repressive histones at the pairing element. A pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus and having one or more disruptions can be referred to as a disrupted pairing element.

[0031] The term “disruption” as used herein with reference to at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain) refers to any genetic modification (e.g., nucleotide deletions, additions, insertions and deletions (indels), inversions, and/or substitutions) of at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus as compared to control pairing elements flanking the ap2-g locus (e.g., Plasmodium parasites not genetically modified as described herein such as wild-type Plasmodium parasites). In some cases, a disruption can be a substitution of one or more nucleotides within a pairing element as compared to control pairing elements flanking the ap2-g locus. For example, a disruption can be a substitution as compared to a pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus as shown in FIG. 2. For example, a disruption can be a substitution as compared to a pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus that has a nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1, a nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2, or a nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:3. In some cases, a disruption can be a deletion of one or more nucleotides within a pairing element as compared to control pairing elements flanking the ap2-g locus. For example, a disruption can be a deletion of at least one pairing element (e.g., the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element) as compared to a pairing element flanking the ap2-g locus. In some cases, a disruption can be effective to reduce or eliminate a level of histone modification at the disrupted pairing element.

[0032] A disrupted pairing element described herein (e.g., a pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain and having one or more disruptions) can be any appropriate length (e.g., can include any appropriate number of nucleotides). For example, a disrupted pairing element can include from about 0 to about 25 (e.g., from about 0 to about 25, from about 0 to about 22, from about 0 to about 20, from about 0 to about 18, from about 0 to about 15, from about 0 to about 12, from about 0 to about 10, from about 0 to about 7, from about 0 to about 5, from about 5 to about 25, from about 10 to about 25, from about 15 to about 25, from about 20 to about 25, from about 5 to about 20, from about 10 to about 15, from about 5 to about 15, or from about 10 to about 20) nucleotides. In some cases, a disrupted pairing element can include about 18 nucleotides (e.g., a disrupted 5′ pairing element can include about 18 nucleotides). In some cases, a disrupted pairing element can include about 24 nucleotides (e.g., a disrupted 3′ pairing element can include about 24 nucleotides).

[0033] A disrupted pairing element described herein (e.g., a pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain and having one or more disruptions) can include any number of disruptions. For example, a disrupted pairing element can include from about 1 to about 10 (e.g., from about 1 to about 8, from about 1 to about 6, from about 1 to about 4, from about 3 to about 10, from about 5 to about 10, from about 7 to about 10, from about 2 to about 8, from about 4 to about 6, from about 2 to about 5, or from about 5 to about 8) disruptions. In some cases, a disrupted pairing element can include about 8 disruptions. For example, when an undisrupted 5′ pairing element includes about 18 nucleotides, the disrupted 5′ pairing element can include 8 substitutions. In some cases, a disrupted pairing element can include about 6 disruptions. For example, when an undisrupted 3′ pairing element includes about 24 nucleotides, the disrupted 3′ pairing element can include 6 substitutions.

[0034] A disrupted pairing element described herein (e.g., a pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain and having one or more disruptions) can have any appropriate nucleic sequence. For example, a disrupted pairing element can be as shown in FIG. 3. For example, a disrupted pairing element can have a nucleic acid sequence that includes the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4.

[0035] Any suitable method can be used to generate Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression). For example, molecular cloning technologies, gene editing technologies (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9, TALENS, and Zinc-finger technologies), site-specific recombinase technologies, and homologous recombination technologies can be used to fuse nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain to the 3′ end of the endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide. In some cases, nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain can be fused to the 3′ end of the endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide as described in Example 1. In some cases, nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain can be fused to the 3′ end of the endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide as described elsewhere (see, e.g., de Koning-Ward et al., Nature Reviews|Microbiology, 13:373-387 (2015); and Prommana et al., PLoS One, 8(8):e73783 (2013)). For example, gene editing technologies (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9, TALENS, and Zinc-finger technologies), site-specific recombinase technologies, and homologous recombination technologies can be used to generate one or more disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus (e.g., one or more disruptions in the 5′ pairing element and/or the 3′ pairing element flanking endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to nucleic acid encoding a destabilization domain). In some cases, one or more disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus can be generated as described in Example 2. In some cases, one or more disruptions in at least one pairing element flanking the endogenous ap2-g locus can be generated as described elsewhere (see, e.g., Avraham et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109(52):E3678-86 (2012)).

[0036] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) lack modified expression levels of other endogenous polypeptides (e.g., endogenous Plasmodium polypeptides other than an AP2-G polypeptide).

[0037] This document also provides methods and materials for using Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression). In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein can be used to produce gametocytes. For example, Plasmodium parasites described herein can be induced to commit to gametocytogenesis thereby producing gametocytes. When Plasmodium parasites described herein include nucleic acid encoding an FKBP destabilization domain fused to the 3′ end of the endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide and express an AP2-G polypeptide fused to an FKBP destabilization domain, the Plasmodium parasites can be induced to commit to gametocytogenesis in the presence of one or more Shld1 molecules. When Plasmodium parasites described herein include a nucleic acid encoding glmS ribozyme fused to the 3′ end of the endogenous nucleic acid encoding an AP2-G polypeptide and express an AP2-G transcript fused to a glmS ribozyme destabilization domain, the Plasmodium parasites can be induced to commit to gametocytogenesis in the absence of N-acetyl glucosamine. Plasmodium parasites described herein can be induced to commit to gametocytogenesis with at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 60 percent, at least 75 percent, at least 90 percent, at least 95 percent, at least 97 percent, at least 98 percent, or at least 99 percent) efficiency. In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein can commit to gametocytogenesis with 100% efficiency.

[0038] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can be used to increase the number of mosquitos that can be infected by Plasmodium parasites (e.g., upon blood feeding). For example, mosquitos that are infected by Plasmodium parasites described herein can produce an increased number of oocysts produced per mosquito (e.g., as compared to a mosquito infected by control Plasmodium parasites such as Plasmodium parasites not genetically modified as described herein including, for example, wild-type Plasmodium parasites), thereby leading to an increased number of sporozoites.

[0039] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can be used to identify one or more molecules (e.g., one or more polypeptides or candidate small molecule drugs) that can be administered to a mammal for the prevention, amelioration, or treatment of malaria. For example, Plasmodium parasites described herein can be used to identify one or more immunogenic molecules that can be administered to a mammal in need thereof (e.g., a mammal having or at risk of developing malaria) to induce an immune response (e.g., an anti-malaria immune response) within the mammal. An anti-malaria immune response can be a protective immune response and/or a therapeutic immune response. In some cases, sporozoites produced by a mosquito as described herein (e.g., following infection of a mosquito with Plasmodium parasites described herein) can be isolated from the mosquito salivary glands and can be used to identify one or more molecules (e.g., immunogenic molecules) produced by Plasmodium sporozoites.

[0040] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can be used to identify, evaluate, and/or validate a therapeutic intervention for malaria. For example, Plasmodium parasites described herein can be used to identify one or more molecules that can be administered to a mammal in need thereof (e.g., a mammal having or at risk of developing malaria) to reduce or eliminate the number of Plasmodium parasites present within the mammal (e.g., can kill one or more Plasmodium parasites present within the mammal). In some cases, sporozoites produced by a mosquito as described herein (e.g., following infection of a mosquito with Plasmodium parasites described herein) can be isolated from the mosquito salivary glands and can be used to identify one or more molecules that can kill Plasmodium parasites.

[0041] In some cases, Plasmodium parasites described herein (e.g., Plasmodium parasites having regulatable AP2-G polypeptide expression) can be induced to commit to gametocytogenesis (e.g., can be induced to exit asexual growth cycles and enter the sexual stage), and the sexual stage Plasmodium parasites can be used to identify one or more molecules that can kill Plasmodium parasites. For example, a candidate therapeutic intervention (e.g., a test molecule) can be administered to Plasmodium parasites as described herein, and the Plasmodium parasites can be monitored for survival. Examples of test molecules that can be assessed for the ability to kill Plasmodium parasites as described herein include, without limitation, polypeptides, nucleic acid molecules encoding a polypeptide, and small molecules. In some cases, the members of a library of different test molecules (e.g., a library of different small molecules) can be assessed to identify individual members having the ability to kill Plasmodium parasites as described herein.

[0042] The invention will be further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Regulatable PfAP2-G Polypeptides

[0043] A regulatable knockdown of PfAP2-G was generated by engineering a transgenic line with AP2-G fused to an FKBP destabilization domain (DD) as described elsewhere (see, e.g., Kafsack et al., Nature, 507(7491):248-52 (2014)). Briefly, a construct encoding an AP2-G polypeptide fused to an HA-tag and an FKBP DD (e.g., an AP2-G-HA-FKBP polypeptide) was stably integrated into the genome of Plasmodium falciparum lines.

[0044] In the absence of the ligand Shield-1 (Shld1), the FKBP destabilization domain was unstable and targets fusion proteins for proteolytic degradation. However, in the presence of Shld1, the FKBP destabilization domain was stabilized, AP2-G-HA-FKBP expression was maintained, and gametocytes were produced (FIG. 1).

Example 2

Enhanced Production of Gametocytes by Modification of Pairing Elements Surrounding the ap2-g Gene

[0045] The pfap2-g locus is flanked by short TG-rich sequences cis regulatory elements known as pairing elements or boundary elements that are required for epigenetic silencing the pfap2-g locus.

[0046] To determine whether mutation of the pairing elements can de-repress the pfap2-g locus and increase rates of sexual conversion, the pairing element sequences were mutated in AP2-G-HA-FKBP parasites grown in the absence of Shld1. The pairing element sequences flanking the pfap2-g locus and the consensus motif are shown in FIG. 2.

[0047] The mutated downstream 3′ pairing element is shown in FIG. 3. In a triplicate assay performed in two different parasite clones having a mutated 3′ pairing element, the deletion of the 3′ pairing element resulted in a doubling of the number of gametocytes (FIG. 4).

Gene Editing

[0048] Gene editing is performed by designing sgRNAs to target either the 5′ or 3′ pairing element for targeted cleavage by the Cas9 protein. A homologous DNA template that flanks the cleavage site and contains the desired mutations to the pairing element is used for homologous recombination to repair the damaged DNA (˜500-1000 base pairs in length). Recovered modified Plasmodium parasite lines are cloned by limiting dilution cloning and assessed for whether they contain the desired modification by genotyping PCR. Successful colonies are whole genome sequenced. Once validated, the level of histone binding is assessed using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with net generation sequencing (ChiP-seq) using antibodies against histone H3 as well as histone variants H3K9me3 and H3K9ace and using input DNA as a control for the immunoprecipitations.

Gametocytogenesis

[0049] The number of gametocytes was determined by splitting the culture in two and treating half with Shld1 and half with the same volume of the vehicle (Day 1). The parental cell line (AP2-G-HA-FKBP) and the pairing element mutant were tested in parallel. After 48 hours (on Day 3), the number of parasites present was counted by microscopy and N-acetylglucosamine was added to all cultures to specifically kill asexual parasites. On Day 9, when gametocytes developed enough that they were readily distinguished from asexual stage parasites by morphology, the number of gametocytes were counted by microscopy. Percentage sexual conversion was calculated by dividing this by the proportion of parasite-infected red blood cells on Day 3.

AP2-G Polypeptide Expression

[0050] AP2-G polypeptide expression was validated using Western blotting and immunofluorescence assays to compare the numbers of cells expressing PfAP2-G in parasites with the mutated pairing element compared with the parental cell line (AP2-G-HA-FKBP).

[0051] AP2-G mRNA expression was validated using RT-qPCR to compare the levels of pfap2-g transcript in parasites with the mutated pairing element compared with the parental cell line (AP2-G-HA-FKBP).

Other Embodiments

[0052] It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.