Tire having tread sub-layer flush with the groove bottom and reinforcing elements made of high modulus rubber integrated into the tread
11752802 · 2023-09-12
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60C11/0058
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/1346
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/0075
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/0008
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A tire having an axis of rotation and a median plane (CP) perpendicular to the axis of rotation, and comprising: a crown reinforcement, a tread positioned radially on the outside of the crown reinforcement and axially between two shoulders, comprising a contact face intended to come into contact with the roadway while the tire is being driven on, wherein the tread is primarily made up of at least one rubber compound of given dynamic shear modulus M and comprises a plurality of furrows oriented substantially circumferentially, each furrow having a furrow bottom, and a sub-layer disposed radially on the outside of the crown reinforcement and radially on the inside of the tread, wherein the sub-layer is made up of at least one rubber compound of given dynamic shear modulus A is flush with each furrow bottom.
Claims
1. A tire having an axis of rotation and a median plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation, and comprising: a crown reinforcement, a tread positioned radially on the outside of the crown reinforcement and axially between two shoulders, the tread comprising a contact face intended to come into contact with a roadway while the tire is being driven on, the tread being primarily made up of at least one rubber compound of given dynamic shear modulus M, and the tread having a plurality of furrows oriented substantially circumferentially, each furrow having a furrow bottom, the tread including a plurality of tread blocks separated by the furrows; and a sub-layer disposed radially on the outside of the crown reinforcement and radially on the inside of the tread, the sub-layer being made up of at least one rubber compound of given dynamic shear modulus A, the sub-layer forming each furrow bottom and having outer axial ends, wherein, at least on one side axially with respect to the median plane, each of the furrows is bordered axially on each side of the furrow by a reinforcing element that extends radially from the sub-layer toward the outside of the tread to a radial height greater than 75% of a radial thickness of the tread, the reinforcing element having a variable axial width, from a maximum value of less than 30% of an axial width of the tread, the axial width decreasing radially upwardly, and each reinforcing element being made up of a rubber compound of given dynamic shear modulus B, wherein, at least on one side axially with respect to the median plane, a covering layer is disposed radially on the sub-layer and axially covers the sub-layer between adjacent reinforcing elements within a tread block in an axial direction away from the furrows and between a reinforcing element and the shoulder such that the covering layer is axially separated by the furrows, the covering layer being made up of the same material as the material of the reinforcing elements, wherein, at least on one side axially with respect to the median plane, the stiffnesses satisfy the following inequalities: A<M<B, each dynamic shear modulus A, M, and B being measured at 23° C. and under an alternating shear stress at a frequency of 10 Hz and at 10% deformation, and wherein the crown reinforcement extends axially beyond the outer axial ends of the sub-layer.
2. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the dynamic shear modulus A of the material of the sub-layer is less than 1.5 MPa.
3. The tire according to claim 2, wherein the dynamic shear modulus A of the material of the sub-layer is less than 0.5 MPa.
4. The tire according to claim 2, wherein the tg δ value measured at 23° C. at 10 Hz and under an alternating shear deformation of 10% of the material of the sub-layer is less than 0.3.
5. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the sub-layer is made of two different materials.
6. The tire according to claim 5, wherein one of the materials is disposed axially toward the outside of the tire and the other of the materials is disposed axially at the center, the dynamic shear modulus of the material of the sub-layer disposed axially toward the outside being at least 1 MPa less than the dynamic shear modulus of the material of the sub-layer disposed axially at the center.
7. The tire according to claim 5, wherein one of the materials is disposed axially under the furrow bottoms and the other of the materials is interposed axially between the furrow bottoms, alternating with the first-mentioned material, the dynamic shear modulus of the material of the sub-layer disposed axially under the furrow bottoms being at least 1 MPa less than the dynamic shear modulus of the other of the materials.
8. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the dynamic shear modulus of the material of the covering layer and the dynamic shear modulus B of the reinforcing elements is greater than 7 MPa.
9. The tire according to claim 8, wherein the dynamic shear modulus of the material of the covering layer is greater than 12 MPa.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1) The invention will now be described with the aid of the appended drawing, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(5)
(6) The sub-layer 7 is disposed radially directly on the crown reinforcement 5. As is known per se, the crown reinforcement has layers of cords or of monofilament reinforcers that are generally coated with a thin layer of rubber. In the context of the present invention, the indication that the sub-layer 7 is disposed radially directly on the crown reinforcement 5 means that it is in contact with the cords or reinforcers, not taking the rubber coating thereof into account. It is apparent that the sub-layer 7 is disposed axially between the shoulders 60.
(7) Also visible is a covering layer 80 disposed radially on the sub-layer 7 and radially on the inside of the tread 6. Axially on either side of each of the furrows 62, there is a reinforcing element 81 in the form of a wedge (seen in meridian section). This reinforcing element 81 extends radially from the radially outer surface of the sub-layer 7 towards the outside of the tread 6 to a radial height greater than 75% of the radial thickness of the tread. Said reinforcing element 81 has a variable axial width, from a maximum value less than 50% of the axial width of said tread block, said axial width decreasing radially upwardly. The angle formed in radial section by the two lateral walls of said reinforcing element 81 is preferably between 10° and 50°, specifically for example 40°, as illustrated in the figures. Each reinforcing element is made up of the same rubber compound as the covering layer 80, thereby making it possible to extrude them in one and the same operation with the covering layer 80. It will also be noted that the covering layer 80 extends axially from one reinforcing element 81 to the other in the case of the tread blocks that are contained between two furrows 62, and extends axially from one reinforcing element 81 to the shoulder 60, covering substantially the entire sub-layer 7, in the case of the tread blocks situated at the axial ends of the tread. Finally, it will be recalled that, according to one of the features of the present invention, the sub-layer 7 is flush in each furrow bottom 620; thus, it is the material of the reinforcing elements 81 that appears at the lateral walls of each furrow 62, and it is the material of the sub-layer that appears at the furrow bottom 620.
(8) The materials used for the sub-layer 7 will now be discussed. In order to characterize them, the dynamic shear modulus G* measured at 23° C. and under an alternating shear stress at a frequency of 10 Hz and at 10% deformation is used. Advantageously, the material of the sub-layer 7 is characterized by a dynamic shear modulus G* strictly less than 1.5 MPa and more preferably less than 0.5 MPa, and even ideally less than 0.3 MPa. In this way, use is made of a material having very low hysteresis in order to lower the rolling resistance of the tyre. This hysteresis is characterized by the tg δ value measured at 23° C. at 10 Hz and under an alternating shear deformation of 10%. Preferably, this value is around 0.05. Thus, the lower dynamic shear modulus of this material and its lower tg δ make it possible to further reduce hysteresis losses in favour of lower rolling resistance.
(9) An example of an appropriate formulation for the material of the sub-layer 7, with a dynamic shear modulus G* of 2.0 MPa, is as follows:
(10) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Component phr NR 60 BR 40 N683 55 6PPD 1.5 Stearic acid 0.5 CBS 1.5 Sulfur insol 20H 3 ZnO 3
The formulations are given by weight (phr meaning percentage of the weight of elastomer).
(11) As for the covering layer 80 and the reinforcing elements 81, the material thereof is preferably characterized by a dynamic shear modulus G* greater than 12 MPa. In this way, good cornering stiffness is achieved and an excellent performance compromise is obtained, reconciling a drift thrust that is able to give the tyre a good dynamic response and excellent rolling resistance. Advantageously, the tg δ value measured at 23° C. at 10 Hz and under an alternating shear deformation of 10% of this material is less than 0.15.
(12) An example of an appropriate formulation for the material of the covering layer 80 and the wedges is given in Table 1 of the abovementioned patent application WO2016/174100. It should be noted in passing that, as is well known to a person skilled in the art, the parameters describing the performance of the rubber compounds, such as the dynamic shear modulus G* or tg δ with the same formulation, have values that also depend on the vulcanization law.
(13) As for the tread material, a rubber compound can be used in a very wide range of dynamic shear moduli G*; advantageously, said dynamic shear modulus G* is less than 2.5 MPa.
(14)
(15) It should be noted that the stiffness A1 of the material of the first base layer 71 is greater than the stiffness A2 of the material of the second base layer 72. Of course, there could be more than two different materials and therefore two or more transition edges, or it is even possible for the variation in stiffness to be gradual, decreasing axially from the centre to the shoulders.
(16) An example of an appropriate formulation for the material of the first base layer 71, with a dynamic shear modulus G* of 2.0 MPa, is as follows:
(17) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Component phr NR 60 BR 40 N683 55 6PPD 1.5 Stearic acid 0.5 CBS 1.5 Sulfur insol 20H 3 ZnO 3
The formulations are given by weight (phr meaning percentage of the weight of elastomer).
(18) An example of an appropriate formulation for the material of the second base layer 72, with a dynamic shear modulus G* of 0.2 MPa, is as follows:
(19) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Component phr NR 100 Carbon black 4 6PPD 2.2 DPG 2.1 Stearic acid 3 ZnO 1.5 Resin 29.3 HTO 38 CBS 1.4 Sulfur 1.6
The formulations are given by weight (phr meaning percentage of the weight of elastomer).
(20)
(21) Examples of axially symmetric tyres have been described. However, it should be noted that results are obtained that are already very advantageous if only the axial half of the tyre that will be mounted towards the outside of the vehicle is designed as explained above. A person skilled in the art, who is a tyre designer, could adopt embodiment variants, for example variants in which the tread itself comprises several different materials that are superposed radially and/or juxtaposed axially.
Tests
(22) As control, use is made of a tyre R having a tread made of a compound with a dynamic shear modulus G* of 3.0 MPa, and a single-material sub-layer extending axially from one shoulder of the tyre to the other and having a thickness that is radially substantially constant; as seen in radial section, the profile of this sub-layer is the same as the profile of the assembly of the sub-layer 7; this sub-layer is formed by a compound having a dynamic shear modulus G* of 2.0 MPa; the tyre R does not have a covering layer or reinforcing elements. A first test tyre T1 is in accordance with the example of the invention illustrated in
(23) TABLE-US-00004 Results Rolling resistance Cornering stiffness Dz Tyre (Kg/T) (dan/°) R 5.51 164 T1 5.3 187.7 T2 5.6 195
It will be noted that the invention makes it possible to shift the performance compromise between rolling resistance and cornering stiffness; it allows a very significant improvement in cornering stiffness and a slight improvement in rolling resistance (example T1) or a great improvement in cornering stiffness at the cost of an entirely acceptable worsening in the rolling resistance.