RECIPROCATING IMPACT HAMMER
20230279637 · 2023-09-07
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
E02F3/96
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02F5/30
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
An impact hammer for breaking a working surface, the hammer including a drive mechanism and a housing with an inner containment surface and a reciprocating hammer weight. A reciprocation cycle of the hammer weight includes an upstroke and a down-stroke, the hammer weight respectively moving upwards and downwards. On the down-stroke the hammer weight impacts a striker pin with a driven end and a working surface impact end. A vacuum chamber in the housing is formed by the containment surface, upper vacuum sealing coupled to the hammer weight and lower vacuum sealing. The hammer weight is driven toward the striker pin by the pressure differential between atmosphere and the vacuum chamber formed on the upstroke. A down-stroke vent permits fluid egress from the vacuum chamber on the down-stroke.
Claims
1. An impact hammer for breaking a working surface, the impact hammer comprising: a housing with at least one inner side wall forming at least part of a containment surface; a drive mechanism; a reciprocating hammer weight, at least partially located within the housing, with the reciprocating hammer weight capable of reciprocating along a reciprocation axis, wherein a reciprocation cycle of the reciprocating hammer weight, when the reciprocation axis is on an approximately vertical axis, comprises: a) an up-stroke, during which the drive mechanism moves the reciprocating hammer weight upwards along the reciprocation axis; and b) a down-stroke, during which the reciprocating hammer weight moves downwards along the reciprocation axis; a striker pin having a driven end and a working surface impact end, the striker pin located within the housing such that the working surface impact end protrudes from the housing; a shock-absorber coupled to the striker pin; and a variable volume vacuum chamber comprising: a) at least a portion of the containment surface; b) at least one upper vacuum sealing coupled to the reciprocating hammer weight; c) at least one lower vacuum sealing; and at least one down-stroke vent, operable to permit fluid egress from the variable volume vacuum chamber during at least part of the down-stroke; wherein the variable volume vacuum chamber is configured to have a sub-atmospheric pressure during at least part of the up-stroke such that the reciprocating hammer weight is driven toward the striker pin by a pressure differential between an atmosphere and the sub-atmospheric pressure during the down-stroke, and wherein said at least one upper vacuum sealing comprises one or more seals, said one or more seals comprising: an exterior first layer, formed with a first layer exterior surface configured and oriented to come into at least partial sliding contact with the containment surface during a reciprocating movement of the reciprocating hammer weight, and an interior second layer, located between the exterior first layer and the reciprocating hammer weight, the interior second layer at least partially formed from a shock-absorbing material.
2. The impact hammer of claim 1, further comprising a preload, biasing the exterior first layer into contact with the containment surface.
3. The impact hammer of claim 2, wherein the interior second layer forms said preload.
4. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein said first layer and said second layer collectively form a composite cushioning slide, the composite cushioning slide fitted to an exterior surface of the reciprocating hammer weight.
5. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein at least one upper vacuum sealing is coupled to said reciprocating hammer weight by at least partial retention in a recess in the hammer weight.
6. The impact hammer as claimed in claim 1, wherein the upper vacuum sealing forms at least one substantially uninterrupted sealing laterally encompassing the hammer weight.
7. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the at least one down-stroke vent is operable to at least restrict fluid ingress into the variable volume vacuum chamber during at least part of the up-stroke.
8. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the at least one down-stroke vent comprises at least one aperture in the containment surface.
9. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the at least one down-stroke vent is formed in the containment surface.
10. The impact hammer of claim 1, further comprising multiple down-stroke vents, comprising at least one formed down-stroke vent formed in at least two of: (a) the containment surface, (b) the at least one lower vacuum sealing; (c) the reciprocating hammer weight, and (d) the at least one upper vacuum sealing.
11. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the at least one down-stroke vent comprises a valve.
12. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the reciprocating hammer weight impacts directly on the driven end of the striker pin during at least a part of the down-stroke.
13. The impact hammer as claimed in claim 1, comprising a nose block formed from a portion of the housing and at least partially enclosing the striker pin and comprising nose block elements comprising: a cap plate; a upper shock absorbing assembly; a retainer; a lower shock absorbing assembly; a nose cone; positioned substantially about the striker pin between the striker pin driven end and the impact end in the preceding sequence with respect to the impact axis, and wherein the lower vacuum sealing comprises one or more seals located in the nose block.
14. The impact hammer of claim 13, wherein the one or more seals in the nose block are located between at least one of the: cap plate and the striker pin; upper shock absorbing assembly and the striker pin; retainer and the striker pin; retainer and a nose block inner side wall; lower shock absorbing assembly and the striker pin; nose cone and the striker pin.
15. The impact hammer of claim 13, wherein the at least one lower vacuum sealing comprises one or more seals formed as individual independent layers laterally encircling the striker pin.
16. The impact hammer of claim 14, wherein the lower vacuum sealing comprises seals located in at least one said shock absorbing assembly.
17. The impact hammer of claim 16, wherein the shock-absorbers are coupled to the striker pin by the retainer, the retainer being interposed between the shock-absorbing assemblies, wherein at least the lower shock-absorbing assembly is formed from a plurality of un-bonded layers including at least two elastic layers interleaved by an inelastic layer, wherein the lower vacuum sealing comprises one or more seals located in the lower shock absorbing assembly between a said elastic layer and the striker pin.
18. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the variable volume vacuum chamber forms an atmospheric up-stroke brake applying the pressure differential to a movement of the reciprocating hammer weight over an un-driven portion of the up-stroke to decelerate the reciprocating hammer weight up-stroke movement.
19. The impact hammer of claim 1, wherein the reciprocating hammer weight comprises: a lower impact face, at least a portion of the lower impact face forming a vacuum piston face, wherein the vacuum piston face is movable along a path parallel to, or co-axial to, the reciprocation path and the vacuum piston face comprises a hammer weight impact surface for impacting the driven end of the striker pin during at least a part of the down-stroke; an upper face; and at least one side face, wherein at least a portion of an upper face of the reciprocating hammer weight is open to the atmosphere.
20. A method of operating an impact hammer having a) a drive mechanism, b) a housing, c) a variable volume vacuum chamber, d) a reciprocating hammer weight, at least partially located within the housing and capable of reciprocating along a reciprocation axis, e) a striker pin having a striker pin longitudinal axis extending between a driven end of the striker pin and a working surface impact end of the striker pin, f) a nose block formed from a portion of the housing and positioned substantially about the striker pin between the driven end and the working surface impact end with respect to an impact axis that is coaxial or parallel to the reciprocation axis, wherein a said at least one upper vacuum sealing comprises: an exterior first layer, formed with a first layer exterior surface configured and oriented to come into at least partial sliding contact with the containment surface during a reciprocating movement of the reciprocating hammer weight, and an interior second layer, located between the exterior first layer and the reciprocating hammer weight, the interior second layer at least partially formed from a shock-absorbing material, a preload, biasing the exterior first layer into contact with the containment surface, and wherein the striker pin is located within the housing such that the working surface impact end protrudes from the housing and wherein the striker pin is positioned to move substantially along a linear impact axis that is coaxial or parallel to the striker pin longitudinal axis and coaxial or parallel to the reciprocation axis, the method comprising: a) contacting the working surface impact end of the striker pin to a working surface to be broken; b) operating the drive mechanism to begin lifting the reciprocating hammer weight such that a volume of the variable volume vacuum chamber increases and a pressure differential between an atmosphere and the variable volume vacuum chamber is created; c) causing an up-stroke stage, in which the reciprocating hammer weight is moved along the reciprocation axis for a distance equal to a hammer weight up-stroke length from a lower start initial position with a minimum hammer weight potential energy to an upper position at an upper distal end of the housing with a maximum hammer weight potential energy; d) causing an upper stroke transition, in which hammer weight movement halts before reversing direction along the reciprocation axis; e) releasing the reciprocating hammer weight, wherein the pressure differential acting on the reciprocating hammer weight drives the reciprocating hammer weight toward the driven end of the striker pin, and wherein the reciprocating hammer weight moves back along the reciprocation axis for a distance equal to a hammer weight down-stroke length from the upper position to the lower start initial position; f) transmitting an impact force from the striker pin to the working surface to be broken; and g) repeating steps a) through f).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0551] Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
[0552]
[0553]
[0554]
[0555]
[0556]
[0557]
[0558]
[0559]
[0560]
[0561]
[0562]
[0563]
[0564]
[0565]
[0566]
[0567]
[0568]
[0569]
[0570]
[0571]
[0572]
[0573]
[0574]
[0575]
[0576]
[0577]
[0578]
[0579]
[0580]
[0581]
[0582]
[0583]
[0584]
[0585]
[0586]
[0587]
[0588]
[0589]
[0590]
[0591]
[0592]
[0593]
[0594]
[0595]
[0596]
[0597]
[0598]
[0599]
[0600]
[0601]
[0602]
[0603]
[0604]
[0605]
[0606]
[0607]
[0608]
[0609]
[0610]
[0611]
[0612]
[0613]
[0614]
[0615]
[0616]
[0617]
[0618]
[0619]
[0620]
[0621]
[0622]
[0623]
[0624]
[0625]
[0626]
[0627]
[0628]
[0629]
[0630]
[0631]
[0632]
[0633]
[0634]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0635] Reference numerals for the figures
TABLE-US-00001 (1)-Impact hammer (41)-annular membrane (2)-excavator (42)-void (3)-human operator (43)-down-stroke vent (4)-striker pin (44)-valve (5)-working surface (45)-vacuum pump (6)-housing (46)-vacuum tank (7)-excavator arm (47)-recess (striker pin) (8)-containment surface (48)-distal travel stop (9)-hammer weight (49)-proximal travel stop (10)-impact axis (50)-first (upper) shock absorbing assembly (11)-drive mechanism (51)-second (lower) shock absorbing assembly (12)-strop (52)-elastic layer (13)-upper face (hammer weight) (53)-inelastic layer (14)-sheave (54)-inner side wall (nose block) (15)-lower impact face (hammer weight) (55)-independent sealing layers (16)-side face (hammer weight) (56)-nose cone ring seals (17)-driven end (striker pin) (57)-annular recesses (nose cone) (18)-impact end (striker pin) (58)-integral elastic layer seal (19)-shock absorber (59)-distinct elastic layer seal (20)-nose block (60)-inelastic layer seal (21)-cap plate (61)-intimate fit seal (22)-vacuum chamber (62)-recoil plate ring seals (23)-vacuum piston face (63)-annular recesses (recoil plate) (24)-upper vacuum sealing (64)-flexible diaphragm (25)-lower vacuum sealing (65)-outer rim (26)-recoil plate (66)-static seal (27)-retaining pin (67)-maximum impact height (prior art) (28)-nose cone (68)-inclined drop height (prior art) (29)-attachment coupling (69)-maximum drop height (30)-cushioning slides seals (70)-inclined drop height (31)-in-weight seal (71)-tracked carrier (32)-V-shape protrusions (72)-azimuth cradle (33)-retention recess (73)-void-reduction foam (34)-biasing means (74)-intermediary layer peripheral rim portion (35)-fillets (75)-distinct elastic or inelastic layer seal (36)-pre-load (100)-prior art impact hammer (37)-vertex (200)-robotic tunnelling impact hammer (38)-intermediary element (1-101)-large impact hammer (39)-strap (1-102)-large excavator (40)-flexible seal (1-103)-weight (1-1)-impact hammer (1-104)-striker pin (1-2)-small excavator (1-109)-narrow side walls (1-3)-hammer weight (1-110)-upper distal face (1-4)-tool end (1-111)-lower distal face (1-5)-working surface (1-112)-linear impact axis (1-6)-housing (1-113)-cushioning slides (1-7)-housing inner side walls (1-114)-first layer (1-8)-wide side walls (1-115)-second layer (1-9)-narrow side walls (1-116)-exterior surface-first layer (1-10)-upper distal face (1-117)-outer surface-second layer (1-11)-lower distal face (1-118)-underside-first layer (1-12)-impact axis (1-119)-interior surface -second layer (1-13)-cushioning slides (1-120)-longitudinal apices (1-14)-first layer (1-121)-weight surface under second layer (1-15)-second layer (1-122)-displacement void (1-15a-d)-second layer (1-123)-securing feature (1-16)-exterior surface-first layer (1-124)-socket (1-17)-outer surface-second layer (1-125)-retention face (1-17a-d)-outer surface-second layer (1-126)-location projection (1-18)-underside-first layer (1-127)-locating recess (1-19)-interior surface -second layer (1-128)-aperture-second layer (1-19a-d)-interior surface -second layer (1-129)-aperture-first layer (1-20)-longitudinal apices (1-130)-locating portion (1-21)-weight surface under second layer (1-131)-tensioning features (1-22)-displacement void (1-213)-cushioning slide (1-22a-d)-displacement void (1-214)-first layer (1-23a-23e)-securing feature (1-215)-second layer (1-23f-23k)-securing feature (1-216)-first layer exterior surface (1-23m)-securing feature (1-217)-second layer outer surface (1-24)-socket (1-218)-first layer interior surface (1-25)-retention face (1-219)-second layer interior surface (1-26)-location projections (1-231)-upper sub-layer (1-27)-locating recesses (1-232)-intermediate sub-layer (1-28)-aperture-second layer (1-233)-lower sub-layer (1-29)-aperture-first layer (1-234)-lower sub-layer recess (1-30)-locating portion (1-235)-lower layer side walls (1-105)-working surface (2-20)-distal travel stops (1-106)-housing (2-21)-proximal travel stops (1-107)-housing inner side walls (2-22)-locating pins guide elements (1-108)-wide side walls (2-23)-outer periphery-elastic layer (2-1)-rock-breaking hammer (2-24)-inner periphery-elastic layer (2-2)-hammer weight (2-25)-null-point path/position (2-3)-housing (2-26)-tension band guide elements (2-4)-striker pin (2-27)-nose block side walls (2-5)-nose block (2-28)-indent-nose block walls (2-6)-attachment coupling ( (2-29)-anchor points (2-7a)-first shock absorbing assembly (2-30)-stabilizing features guide elements (2-7b)-second shock absorbing assembly (2-31)-tab portions (2-8)-retainer in the form of recoil plate (2-32)-lateral clearance (2-9)-upper cap plate (2-33)-restraining elements (2-10)-nose block bolts (2-34)-outer periphery-inelastic layer (2-11)-nose cone (2-35)-inner periphery-inelastic layer (2-12)-elastic layers/polyurethane (2-36)-outer periphery taper-inelastic layer (2-13)-inelastic layer-steel plate (2-37)-outer periphery taper-elastic layer (2-14)-retaining pins (2-100)-impact axis (2-15)-recess (2-16)-elongate slides guide elements (2-116)-elongate slides (2-17)-longitudinal projections (2-117)-longitudinal projection (2-18)-rock (2-19)-concave recess
[0636]
[0637]
[0638] The pulley (14a) is formed as a sheave to limit lateral movement of the connector (12) along the rotation axis of the sheave (14a).
[0639] It will be appreciated that when the impact hammer (1) is orientated as shown in
[0640] To aid readability and clarity, the orientation of the impact hammer (1) and its constituents is referred to with respect to use of the impact hammer (1) operating with said hammer weight (9) moving along said impact axis (10) about a substantially vertical axis, and thereby denoting the descriptors ‘lower’ and ‘upper’ as comparatively referring to positions respectively closer and further vertically from the working surface (5). It will be appreciated however this orientation nomenclature is solely for explanatory purposes and does not in any way limit the apparatus to use in the vertical axis. The impact hammer (1) is able to operate in a wide range of orientations as discussed further subsequently.
[0641] In operation the drive mechanism (11) lifts the hammer weight (9) via the flexible strop (12). The hammer weight (9) is formed substantially cylindrically with a lower impact face (15) on the opposing side to said upper face (13), and a hammer weight side face (16).
[0642] The impact hammer (1) embodiment shown in
[0643] The hammer weight (9) impacts on the driven end (17) of the striker pin (4) along the impact axis (10), substantially co-axial with the striker pin's (4) longitudinal axis.
[0644] A shock-absorber (19) is coupled to the striker pin (4) and both are retained in a lower portion of the housing (6), referred to herein as the “nose block” (20)
[0645] A variable volume vacuum chamber (22) is formed by: [0646] an upper vacuum sealing (24) located between the hammer weight (9) and the containment surface (8), the upper vacuum sealing encompassing/encircling the hammer weight (9); [0647] the lower impact face (15) of the hammer weight (9); [0648] the upper boundary (referred to herein as the “cap plate” (21)) of the nose block (20); [0649] the driven end (17) of the striker pin (4) protruding through the cap plate (21), and [0650] at least a portion of the containment surface (8), and
[0651] a lower vacuum sealing (25) more clearly discernible in
[0652] The vacuum chamber (22) includes an upper vacuum sealing (24) between the hammer weight and the containment surface and a lower vacuum sealing (25) (more clearly discernible in
[0653]
[0654] The vacuum chamber (22) is configured with at least one movable vacuum piston face (23) which in the embodiment of
[0655] In addition to the shock absorber (19) and the striker pin (4), the nose block (20) also includes a retainer in the form of recoil plate (26), a retaining pin (27), a lower boundary in the form of a rigid nose plate (herein referred to as a nose cone (28)) and an attachment coupling (29) for attachment of the impact hammer (1) to the excavator (2). The interaction of the nose block (20) components is described in further detail elsewhere.
[0656] The operation of the impact hammer (1) and the movement of both the hammer weight (9) and the striker pin (4) in use require that the vacuum sealing (24, 25) is capable of accommodating relative and/or sliding movement therebetween. The vacuum sealing (24, 25) may be fixed to the hammer weight (9), within the nose block (20), containment surface (8) or a combination of same and these variations are subsequently considered in greater detail later.
[0657] In operation, a full reciprocation cycle of the impact hammer (1) comprises four basic stages (described more fully subsequently) consisting of; the up-stroke, upper stroke transition, down-stroke and lower stroke transition.
[0658] During these four stages (with reference to an impact hammer (1) orientated with a vertical impact axis (10)), the corresponding effects in the vacuum chamber (22) are: [0659] up-stroke: from the start position shown in
[0663] The cycle is then repeated to break the working surface (5) by reciprocating the hammer (1).
[0664] In use, the striker pin (4) drops further than is shown in
[0665] During the above-described reciprocation cycle, the upper vacuum sealing (24) forms the dynamic sealing between the static containment surfaces (8) and the moving hammer weight (9). In the embodiment shown in
[0668] The functioning and roles of the cushioning slides (1-13) are more comprehensively expanded on below with reference to
[0669]
[0670]
[0671] It will be appreciated that in alternative embodiments (not shown) the upper vacuum sealing (24) may alternatively be fixed to the containment surfaces (8) of the housing (6). However, there are several advantages in locating the upper vacuum sealing (24) on the hammer weight (9). Firstly, the distance travelled by the hammer weight (9) along the impact axis (10) greatly exceeds the length of the hammer weight (9) side face (16). Upper vacuum sealing (24) located on the containment surface (8) would need to extend over the full extent of the hammer weight (9) travel along the impact axis (10), while upper vacuum sealing (24) located on the hammer weight (9) is only essential at a single position about the impact axis (10). Secondly, upper vacuum sealing (24) located on the containment surface (8) adjacent the hammer weight's (9) path along the impact axis (10) is vulnerable to damage by any lateral movements of the hammer weight (9). Although this can be addressed by the incorporation of shock absorption and abrasion resistance capabilities, these must extend along the full extent of the containment surface (8) adjacent the hammer weight's (9) passage. In contrast, upper vacuum sealing (24) positioned on the hammer weight (9) may be configured to accommodate lateral weight movement without also being required to provide lateral shock absorbing or centering capacity.
[0672] It will also be appreciated that the hammer weight (9) may be formed in a variety of solid volumes, including a cube, cuboid, an elongate substantially rectangular/cuboid plate or blade configuration, prism, cylinder, parallelepiped, polyhedron and so forth. The embodiment shown in
[0673]
[0674]
[0675]
[0676] The upper vacuum sealing (24) forms a substantially uninterrupted sealing laterally encompassing the hammer weight (9). The upper vacuum sealing (24) may be formed from a single continuous, uninterrupted seal or by multiple abutting, overlapping, conterminous, interlocking, mating, and/or proximal adjacent seal sections.
[0677] In the embodiment shown in
[0678]
[0679]
[0680] In these embodiments, the vacuum sealing (24, 25) may include a seal with a radially acting pre-load (36) and a circumferentially acting biasing means (34). The preload may take several forms, including, but not limited to a compressible medium, a spring, an elastomer, buffers, or the like.
[0681]
[0682] The intermediary elements (38) may be configured in a variety of forms, including plates, discs, annular rings and the like.
[0683] Alternative embodiments for coupling the intermediary element (38) to the hammer weight (9) include non-flexible couplings which are laterally slideable with respect to the impact axis, while being substantially rigid parallel to the impact axis, as well as alternative flexible linkages, such as lines, wires, braids, chains, universal joints and so forth. Such coupling configurations allow the intermediate element (38) to maintain an effective sealing with the containment surface (8) without being affected by lateral movements of the hammer weight (9).
[0684] In the embodiment of
[0685]
[0686] During reciprocating operation of the impact hammer (1), the intermediary elements (38) (including straps (39) and annular membranes (41a, 41b)) are pulled or pushed along the reciprocation path by movement of the hammer weight (9) according to the direction of travel, and relative position of the intermediary element (38) relative to the hammer weight (9).
[0687]
[0688] The other cushioning slides (1-13a, 1-13c, 1-13e) may also act as partial seals but primarily act as shock absorbing elements that also help to align the hammer (9) in the housing (6) as it reciprocates.
[0689] It can thus be seen that the seals forming the upper vacuum sealing (24) may be coupled to the hammer weight (9) by: [0690] a cushioning slide (1-13); [0691] mounting on, or retention or attachment to, an intermediary element (38); [0692] retention in a recess (33), void, space, aperture, groove or the like in the hammer weight (9), cushioning slide (1-13) and/or intermediary element (38); [0693] direct mounting on said side face (16); and/or [0694] any combination or permutation of the above.
[0695] As described previously, during impacting operation during which the vacuum chamber (22) expands during the up-stroke, air leakage into the vacuum chamber (22) may occur through any misaligned, ill-fitting, worn, inadequate or damaged seals or containment surfaces, interference from airborne residual debris, material or design characteristics or limitations and so forth. In all the embodiments shown in
[0696] It is extremely difficult to achieve a completely impassable vacuum sealing (24, 25) in such a high speed, high energy reciprocation and thus during the up-stroke the upper (24) and/or lower (25) vacuum sealing may allow some air pass into the vacuum chamber (22), thereby increasing the pressure therein. The volume of such air leakage is dependent on a number of parameters, including the effectiveness of the sealing, area of sealing, pressure differential between vacuum chamber (22) and atmosphere and the exposure time the pressure differential is applied across the sealing.
[0697] The time the pressure differential is applied is relatively small as the cycle time of each reciprocation is 2-4 seconds. Reciprocating a heavy weight (9) (in the order of 1000's of Kilograms) over a 3-6 metre stroke length with a 2-4 cycle time is such a rapid rate that the heat that would be generated by the friction on a ‘soft’, e.g. rubber sealing (24, 25) would likely melt it after a few strokes.
[0698] Leakage can be minimised by using more seals and/or more flexible seals, however, this inherently increases friction and in such a high speed reciprocation, such seals can quickly become damaged or retard the hammer weight movement. Thus a balance is required between sealing effectiveness and friction. In preferred embodiments, the hammer weight (9) moves with such speed and force that highly effective seals such as rubber or other ‘soft’ seals are quickly damaged and become non-functional. Thus, it is preferable to use a less effective ‘hard’ seal that can withstand the high-friction loads, even though this may lead to more air leakage into the vacuum chamber.
[0699] Any residual air in the void (42) plus any leakage via the vacuum sealing (24, 25) and/or the housing (6) contributes to reduce the magnitude of the vacuum generated in the vacuum chamber (22). Moreover, on the down-stroke, any air inside the vacuum chamber (22) becomes increasingly compressed during the down-stroke applying a retarding force to the movement of the hammer weight (22).
[0700] As shown in
[0701] It will be appreciated however, that one or more vents (43) may alternatively, or additionally formed in the upper vacuum sealing (24) (as shown in
[0702] Down-stroke vents may alternatively, or in addition be formed in the lower vacuum sealing (25), the nose block (20) and/or through the hammer weight (9) (not shown).
[0703] The vents (43) shown in
[0704] An additional or alternative mechanism of removing residual air in the vacuum chamber (22) is shown in
[0705]
[0706] In each embodiment, the down-stroke vents (43) are designed to open on the hammer down-stroke to permit air egress from the vacuum chamber (22) and closed on the up-stroke to prevent or at least restrict air ingress to the vacuum chamber (22). The down-stroke vents are biased closed with a bias sufficient to prevent undesired opening due to hammer vibration or impacts while opening when the pressure in the vacuum chamber reaches a threshold super-atmospheric level, e.g. 0.1 Bar.
[0707] Thus, compression of any air inside the vacuum chamber and the resultant heat is minimised as the air and heat is vented. A means for optionally reducing the potential for residual air in the void (42) is shown in
[0708] A variety of alternative sealing configurations from said upper vacuum sealing (24) may be employed to form said lower vacuum sealing (25).
[0709] In contrast to the upper vacuum sealing (24), the lower vacuum sealing (25) is not subjected to the same magnitude of relative movement between adjacent sealing surfaces. While the upper vacuum sealing (24) is required to seal the movement of the hammer weight (9) along its travel along the reciprocation axis (at least several meters), the lower vacuum sealing (25) need only seal the movement of the striker pin (4) relative to the elements of the nose block (20).
[0710]
[0716] The planar surfaces of the nose block (20) inner boundaries are formed at the upper end by the cap plate (21) and at the lower end by the nose cone (28).
[0717] It can thus be seen that these inner boundaries and the upper and lower planar surfaces of the recoil plate (26) provide four rigid, inelastic surfaces adjacent to the shock absorbing assemblies (50, 51). Thus, depending on the number of elastic (52) and inelastic layers (53) employed in an embodiment, an individual elastic layer (52) may be interposed by the rigid planar surfaces of either: [0718] the cap plate (21) and an inelastic layer (53); [0719] the nose cone (28) and an inelastic layer (53); [0720] two inelastic layers (53), or [0721] an inelastic layer (53) and the recoil plate (26).
[0722] In each of the above configurations, the elastic layer (52) is sandwiched between the parallel planar surfaces of the adjacent rigid surfaces orthogonal to the striker pin longitudinal axis, co-axial with the impact axis (10).
[0723] It can be thus seen that positioned about the striker pin (4) between the driven end (17) and the impact end (18) is the following sequence of nose block elements (20): [0724] cap plate (21); [0725] first (or upper) shock absorbing assembly (50); [0726] recoil plate (26); [0727] second (or lower) shock absorbing assembly (51), and [0728] nose cone (28).
[0729] The lower vacuum sealing (25) is required to prevent or at least restrict air ingress via the above-listed nose-block elements into the vacuum chamber (22) and may be formed from seals positioned at several alternative, or cumulative positions in the above sequence of nose block elements.
[0730] The lower vacuum sealing (25) may thus be provided by one or more seals positioned at one of more of the interfaces between adjacent elements of the nose block (20). The different potential positions of the seals are: [0731] between the nose cone (28) and the striker pin (4) (shown in
[0736] According to a further embodiment, the lower vacuum sealing (25) is provided by one or more seals formed as individual independent sealing layers (55) laterally encompassing the striker pin and located: [0737] between the nose cone (28) and the lower shock absorbing assembly (51) (shown in
[0740] Considering the above referenced configurations individually in more detail,
[0741]
[0742]
[0743]
[0750]
[0751]
[0752]
[0753] In
[0754] In
[0755] The lower vacuum sealing (25) may alternatively be formed from, or include; a flexible elastomer, an elastic or inelastic material, biased into contact with the striker pin and/or the nose block inner side walls by a preload or imitate fit, unidirectional vent and/or any combination or permutation of same.
[0756] As discussed above, preferred embodiments are able to operate effectively at any inclination of the impact axis (10), including upwards. This provides great versatility for general impacting operations, quarrying, mining, extraction, demolition work and so forth. It also enables the impact hammer to be applied to specialised applications such as a further embodiment in the form of a robotic tunnelling impact hammer (200) shown in
[0757]
[0758] However, as explained in greater detail elsewhere, not all the kinetic energy of the hammer weight (4) is transferred to the working surface (5), as in the event of: [0759] a ‘mis-hit’ when the operator drops the hammer weight (4) on the striker pin (4) driven end (17) without the impact end (18) being in contact with the working surface (5), the impact of the hammer weight (9) forces the proximal travel stop (49) against the slideably coupled retaining pin (27) (components shown most clearly in
[0762] Due to the relatively massive mass of the hammer weight (9) in comparison to the rest of the impact hammer (1), the contact area between the hammer weight (9) and the containment surface (8) is particularly vulnerable to damage. Consequently, the portion of the containment surface (8) and adjacent hammer housing (6) surrounding the hammer weight (9) at the point of impact with the striker pin (4) requires additional strengthening compared to the remainder of the housing (6).
and
the gravity-only prior art impact hammer (100) of
wherein [0772] the overall housing column length V.sub.L, G.sub.L is the length of the containment surface (8) parallel with the impact axis (10) between the driven end (17) of the striker pin (4) and the upper distal end of the housing (6), and [0773] the hammer stroke length V.sub.X, G.sub.X is the distance travelled by the hammer weight (9) along the impact axis (10) inside the containment surface (8).
[0774] As described previously, the impact hammer (1) can achieve the same impact energy as a prior art gravity-only impact hammer (100) using a significantly lighter hammer weight (4). Assuming an equal diameter (to facilitate comparison), it follows that the hammer weight height V.sub.W of the vacuum-assisted impact hammer (1) is less than the hammer weight height G.sub.W of the prior art impact hammer (100). The reduced hammer weight height V.sub.W compared to the hammer weight height G.sub.W produces numerous advantages for the impact hammer (1), namely: [0775] despite the hammer stroke length V.sub.X being equal to the hammer stroke length G.sub.X, the overall column length V.sub.L is less than overall column length G.sub.L. The additional length of overall housing column length G.sub.L required by the prior art impact hammer (100) naturally increases the total weight of the impact hammer (100) and consequently adds six to seven times that value to the weight of the required excavator (2). As the extra weight on the prior art hammer (100) is located at the extremity of the housing (6), its polar moment of inertia also detrimentally increases the required strength (and thus weight) of the type of excavator (2) able to manoeuvre the impact hammer (100) effectively; [0776] the strengthened housing portion V.sub.X of the impact hammer (1) is shorter than the corresponding portion G.sub.X in direct proportion to the difference in the hammer weight heights G.sub.W-V.sub.W. This results in further weight savings for the vacuum-assisted impact hammer (1). [0777] As the hammer weight height V.sub.W of the vacuum-assisted impact hammer (1) is only a third of the hammer weight height G.sub.W of the prior art impact hammer (100), the behaviour of the respective hammer weights (9) during lateral impacts with the containment surface (8) differ. As the hammer weight (9) is deflected laterally towards the containment surface (8), it will seldom make simultaneous uniform contact with the containment surface (8) and the hammer weight side face (16) precisely parallel. Instead, the hammer weight (9) tends to rotate with respect to the containment surface (8) generating a couple. The resulting impact with the containment surface (8) is thus a point load rather than being dissipated uniformly along the length of the strengthened housing portion V.sub.X, G.sub.X. The vastly shortened hammer weight height V.sub.W of the vacuum-assisted impact hammer (1) significantly reduces the magnitude of such forces, thus further reducing the magnitude of the strengthening required over the strengthened housing portion V.sub.X relative to the prior art hammer (100).
[0778]
[0779]
[0780] The impact hammer (1-1) includes: [0781] a lifting and/or reciprocating mechanism (not shown), [0782] a reciprocating component in the form of a weight configured as a unitary hammer weight (1-3) with an integral tool end (1-4) for striking a working surface (1-5) and [0783] a housing (1-6) attached to the excavator (1-2) and partially enclosing the hammer weight (1-3) with a containment surface in the form of housing inner side walls (1-7).
[0784]
[0785] The impact hammer (1-100) includes: [0786] a lifting mechanism (not shown) [0787] a reciprocating component in the form of a weight (1-103) [0788] a housing (1-106) attached to the excavator (1-102) and partially enclosing the hammer weight (1-103) with a ‘containment surface’ or ‘housing weight guide’ provided in the form of a housing inner side walls (1-107).
[0789] The lifting mechanism raises the weight (1-103) within the housing weight guide (1-107), before being dropped onto a striker pin (1-104), which in turn impacts the working surface (1-105).
[0790] Regarding the hammer (1-1) shown in
[0791] In operation, the hammer weight (1-3) reciprocates about a linear impact axis (1-12) passing longitudinally through the geometric centre of the hammer weight (1-3). The hammer weight (1-3) is raised upwards along the impact axis (1-12) by the lifting mechanism to its maximum vertical height, prior to being released, or driven downwards back along the impact axis (1-12) until impacting with the working surface (1-5).
[0792]
[0795] The first layer (1-14) is formed with an exterior surface (1-16) configured and orientated to be the first contact point between the side walls (1-8, 1-9) and the housing inner side walls (1-7). The second layer (1-15) is located between the first layer (1-14) and the weight side wall (1-8, 1-9) and formed with an outer surface (1-17) connected to the underside (1-18) of the first layer (1-14) and an interior surface (1-19) connected to the weight side walls (1-8, 1-9).
[0796] The first and second layers (1-14, 1-15) are substantially parallel to each other and to the outer surface of the sidewalls (1-8, 1-9). Although the cushioning slides (1-13) may be located in a variety of positions on the side walls (1-8, 9), the narrow width of the short side walls (1-9) in the embodiment shown in
[0797] In the alternative embodiment shown in
[0801] The hammer (1-103) may also take the form of the vacuum assisted hammer (1) described with respect to
[0802] As the weight (1-103) is used to impact a striker pin (1-104), there is no need for a tool end or the ability to be reversed. The weight (1-103) is a substantially cuboid block of rectangular cross section with a pair of parallel longitudinal wide side walls (1-108), joined by a pair of parallel shorter side walls (1-109), with an opposing upper and lower distal faces (1-110, 1-111).
[0803] In operation, the hammer weight (1-103) reciprocates about a linear impact axis (1-112) passing longitudinally through the geometric centre of the hammer weight (1-103). The hammer weight (1-103) is raised upwards along the impact axis (1-112) by the lifting mechanism to its maximum vertical height, prior to being released, falling under gravity and/or with a vacuum assistance along the impact axis (1-112) until impact with the striker pin (1-104). The weight (1-103) is fitted with a plurality of cushioning slides (1-113) positioned about the side walls (1-108, 1-109).
[0804]
[0807]
[0808] The first layer (1-114) is formed with an exterior surface (1-116) configured and orientated to be the first contact point between the side walls (1-108, 1-109) and the housing inner side walls (1-107). The second layer (1-115) is located between the first layer (1-114) and the weight side wall (1-108, 1-109) and formed with an outer surface (1-117) connected to the underside (1-118) of the first layer (1-114) and an interior surface (1-119) connected to the weight side walls (1-108, 1-109). The first and second layers (1-114, 1-115) are substantially parallel to each other and to the outer surface of the sidewalls (1-108, 1-109).
[0809] The cushioning slides (1-113) placed on the sidewalls (1-108, 1-109) in the embodiment of
[0810]
[0811]
[0812] Impact hammers (including the impact hammers (1, 1-1, 1-100) described above) are configured to raise and lower the weight with the minimum obstruction or resistance from the housing (6, 1-6, 1-106). The hammer weight (9, 1-3, 1-103) is only directly connected to the lifting mechanism (not shown) and not the housing inner side walls (8, 1-7, 1-107). Thus, as the weight (9, 1-3, 1-103) travels upwards or downwards, any deviation from a perfectly vertical impact axis (10, 1-12, 1-112) for the path of the weight (9, 1-3, 1-103) and/or the orientation of the housing inner side walls (8, 1-7, 1-107) can lead to mutual contact.
[0813] An initial point of impact is predominantly at one of the weight apices (1-20, 1-120) which applies a corresponding moment to the weight (1-3, 1-103), causing the weight (1-3, 1-103) to rotate until impact on the diametrically opposite apex (1-20, 1-120) unless the weight (1-3, 1-103) reaches the top or bottom of its reciprocation path first. The impact of the weight (1-3, 1-103) on the working surface (1-5, 1-105) may also generate lateral reaction forces if the working surface (1-5, 1-105) is not orthogonal to the impact axis (1-12, 1-112), and/or, if the working surface (1-5, 1-105) does not fracture on impact.
[0814]
[0815] The hammer weight (1-3) shown in
[0816]
[0817] When the weight (1-3, 1-103) impacts the housing inner side walls (1-7, 1-107) and a compressive load is applied to the elastomer forming the second layer (1-15, 1-115), the shock is absorbed by displacement of volume of the elastomer (1-15, 1-115) away from the point of impact.
[0818] Any rigid boundaries surrounding the elastomer (1-15, 1-115) restrict the displacement of the elastomer (1-15, 1-115) to occur at any unrestrained boundaries. In the preceding embodiments where the elastomer (1-15, 1-115) is bounded by the rigid first layer underside (1-18, 1-118) and the rigid upper surface (1-21, 1-121) of the weight (1-3, 1-103) underneath the elastomer (1-15, 1-115), the elastomer (1-15, 1-115) is displaced laterally substantially parallel with the surface of the weight (1-3, 1-103) under compression.
[0819] The embodiment shown in
[0820] The embodiment in
[0821] The elastomer cannot deflect laterally outwards under compression as the cushioning slides (1-13, 1-113) in both embodiments are surrounded on their exterior lateral periphery by rigid portions (1-21, 1-121) of the weight (1-3, 1-103). Therefore, under compression, the elastomer (1-15, 1-115) is only able to displace laterally inwards into the circular displacement voids (1-22, 1-122). In further embodiments (not shown), the displacement voids may be formed in the first layer underside (1-18, 1-118), and/or the rigid upper surface (1-21, 1-121) of the weight (1-3, 1-103) underneath the elastomer (1-15, 1-115).
[0822] However, a variety of alternative configurations of displacement void are possible and exemplary samples are illustrated in
[0823]
[0824]
[0825]
[0826]
[0827]
[0828]
[0829] The shock absorbing elastomer forming the above described second layers (1-15, 1-115, 1-15a-1-15d) all provide a configuration to absorb the impact shock by allowing the elastomer to be deflected into the displacement voids (1-22, 1-122, 1-22a-1-22d) thereby preventing damage to the elastomer polymer. The deflection is typically less than 30% as above 30% deflection there is an increasing likelihood of damage occurring to the cushioning slides.
[0830] The shock absorbing potential capacity of the cushioning slides (1-13, 1-113) is enhanced by keeping the adjacent contact surfaces of the first (1-14, 1-114) and second (1-15, 1-115) layers unbonded or un-adhered to each other. The contact surfaces being first layer upper surface (1-17, 1-117) and the second layer lower surface (1-18, 1-118). This enables the elastomer upper surface (1-17) to move laterally across the underside (1-18) of the first layer under compression. However, the first (1-14, 1-114) and second layers (1-15, 1-115) clearly require a means to maintain their mutual contact under the violent effects of the impacting operations.
[0831]
[0832]
[0833]
[0838] The second layer (1-15, 1-115) is sufficiently flexible such that it can be pressed over the first layer and corresponding securing features (1-23) to become locked in position. Alternatively, where the cushioning slides (1-13, 1-113) are circular the second layer (1-15, 1-115) may be screwed onto the first layer (1-14, 1-114) where a suitable mating thread is provided as per
[0839] Yet further variations of securing features (1-23f-1-23k) are shown in
[0840]
[0841]
[0842]
[0843]
[0844]
[0845]
[0846] The above-described cushioning slides (1-13, 1-113) have a UHMWPE first layer (1-14, 1-14a-1-14f, 1-114) and a polyurethane elastomer second layer (1-15, 1-15a-1-15j, 1-115) to provide a relatively lightweight cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113) while providing sufficient shock-absorbing and low-friction capabilities. As discussed above, the high deceleration forces (up to one thousand G) create significant additional forces for any increase in weight of the cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113). Thus, while it is possible to use materials such as steel for the first layer (1-14, 1-114) this configuration would add greater mass by virtue of its higher density and thus have a higher inertia than a UHMEPE first layer (1-14, 1-114) during impacts.
[0847]
[0848] It will be appreciated that any impact forces acting to separate the first layer (1-14, 1-114) from the second layer (1-15, 1-115) also act to separate the whole cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113) from the weight (1-3, 1-103). It also follows that the means of securing the whole cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113) to the weight (1-3, 1-103) against the adverse effects of high acceleration forces need to be even higher than those applied solely to the first layer (1-14, 1-114). Consequently, as shown in
[0849] As shown in
[0853] Each retention face (1-25, 1-125) may be formed as a ridge, shoulder, projection, recess, lip, protrusion or other formation presenting a rigid retention face between one of the weight distal ends (1-10, 1-110, 1-11, 1-111) and at least a portion of the cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113) located in the socket (1-25, 1-125) on a side wall (1-8, 1-9, 1-108, 1-109) of the weight (1-3, 1-103).
[0854] The retention face (1-125) of the wide side wall socket (1-124) shown in
[0855] In the aforementioned embodiments, each socket retention face (1-25, 1-125) may be formed as outwardly or inwardly extending walls extending substantially orthogonal to the corresponding side walls (1-8, 1-9, 1-108, and 1-109).
[0856] In the embodiment shown in
[0857] In the embodiment of
[0858] The use of a location recess (1-127) or a location projection (1-126) enables a cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113) to be positioned directly adjacent the upper or lower distal face (1-110, 1-111) without a retention face (1-125) surrounding the entire outer periphery of the cushioning slide (1-13, 1-113) as in the embodiments shown in
[0859] It should be appreciated that sockets (1-124) may not be necessary when using such location projections (1-126) or location recesses (1-127). Instead, the cushioning slides (1-113) may lie directly on the outer surfaces (1-108, 1-109) with only the location projections (1-126) or location recesses (1-127) respectively extending outwards or inwards from the corresponding surface (1-108, 1-109).
[0860]
[0861] As previously identified, the greater the separation between the weight (1-3, 1-103) and the housing inner side walls (1-7, 1-107), the greater distance available for the weight to increase lateral speed under the lateral component of force (e.g. gravity), thereby increasing the resultant impact force. The embodiment shown in
[0866] It will be appreciated however that the pre-tensioning surface features (1-131) need only be formed on one of the above four surfaces to function successfully. In the embodiment shown in
[0867] The pre-tensioning features (1-131) are elastic and shaped so that they are more easily compressed than the main planar portion of the second layer (1-115), The pre-tensioning surface features (1-131) also create a spacing between the first (1-114) and second (1-115) layers and between the second layer (1-115) and the corresponding side wall (1-108 or 1-109).
[0868] The pre-tensioning surface features (1-131) are formed to bias the cushioning slide's exterior surfaces (1-116) into continuous contact with the housing inner side walls (1-107) during reciprocation of the weight (1-113). In use, the pre-tensioning features (1-131) are pre-tensioned when the weight (1-103) is laterally positioned equidistantly within the housing inner side walls (1-107), as shown in
[0869] The exterior surface (1-116) of first layer (1-114) is thus biased into light contact with the housing inner side walls (1-107) when the housing inner side walls (1-107) is in equilibrium, (as shown in
[0870]
[0871] As per the previous embodiments, the layers (1-231, 1-232, 1-233) may be formed with displacement voids to accommodate volume displacement of the elastomer layers (1-231, 1-233) under compression.
[0872] The intermediate rigid layer (1-232) provides a rigid boundary for the elastomer layers (1-231, 1-233) and thereby ensures the elastomer layers deflect laterally under compression. A single, thicker elastomer layer may provide good shock-absorbency but is vulnerable to overheating as the amount of compression and expansion is relatively large compared with multiple thinner layers.
[0873] The upper elastomer layer (1-231) is shaped to provide a pre-tensioning feature for biasing the first layer (1-214) against the housing inner side walls (1-7, 1-107). The pre-tensioning feature is achieved in this example by forming the elastomer layer (1-231) as a bowl with a convex exterior surface (1-217). Alternatively, as in the embodiments shown in
[0874] The lower elastomer layer (1-233) is also formed with a similar pre-tensioning shape feature and further includes a recess (1-234) for accommodating the peripheral wall (1-235) of the first layer (1-214). The recess (1-234) is sufficiently deep such that when assembled in an uncompressed state (
[0875] The cushioning slide (1-213) components may be vulnerable to relative sliding between rigid layers (1-214, 1-232) and elastomer layers (1-231, 1-233) when subjected to high accelerations along the impact axis. Any relative sliding may allow the rigid layers (1-232) to move and damage the other layers (1-233, 1-231). Thus, in the embodiment shown in
[0876] The cushioning slide (1-213) is thus formed as a layered stack which offers improved shock-absorbing characteristics over a singular second layer (1-15), (1-115) as in the previous embodiments. The cushioning slide (1-213), while more complex and costly, may be useful in applications in extremely high impact forces where the cushioning slides (1-13), (1-113) are not sufficiently robust. Accordingly, the first layer (1-214) could be formed from steel or plastic with high wear resistance which, while increasing weight offers increased robustness for high shock loads.
[0877] One embodiment of an impact hammer is illustrated by
[0878] The impact hammer (2-1) also includes a shock absorber in the form of first and second shock absorbing assemblies (2-7a, 2-7b) laterally surrounding the striker pin (2-4) within the nose block (2-5) and interposed by a retainer in the form of recoil plate (2-8).
[0879] The shock-absorbing assemblies (2-7a, 2-7b) and recoil plate (2-8) are held together in the nose block (2-5) as a stack surrounding the striker pin (2-4) by an upper cap plate (2-9) fixed, via longitudinal bolts (2-10), to the nose cone (2-11) portion of the housing (2-3), located at the distal portion of the hammer (2-1), through which the striker pin (2-4) protrudes. The upper cap plate (2-9) is a rigid inelastic plate with a planar lower surface confronting the upper elastic layer (2-12) of the second shock absorbing assembly (2-7b). The nose cone (2-11) is also a rigid fitting with a planar upper surface confronting the lower elastic layer (2-12) of the first shock absorbing assembly (2-7a). The recoil plate (2-8) is formed with rigid parallel upper and lower planar surfaces confronting the lower and upper elastic layers (2-12) of the second (2-7b) and first (2-7a) shock absorbing assemblies respectively. The planar surfaces of the upper cap plate (2-9), recoil plate (2-8) and nose cone (2-11) are substantially parallel, each centrally apertured and aligned to accommodate passage of the striker pin (2-4).
[0880] As may be seen more clearly in
[0881] The striker pin (2-4) is attached to the impact hammer (2-1) by a slideable coupling in the form of two retaining pins (2-14) passing laterally through the recoil plate (2-8) such that a portion of each pin (2-14) partially projects inwardly into a recess (2-15) formed in the striker pin (2-4). The slideable coupling connects the striker pin (2-4) to the recoil plate (2-8) at a retaining location defined by the length of the recess (2-15) between (with respect to the driven end of the striker pin (2-4)) a distal and proximal travel stops (2-20, 2-21).
[0882] The polyurethane rings (2-12) in each shock-absorbing assembly (2-7a, 2-7b) are held in position perpendicular to the striker pin longitudinal axis by guide elements in the form of elongate slides (2-16), located on the interior walls of the nose block (2-5) and orientated substantially parallel with the striker pin longitudinal axis.
[0883] Each polyurethane ring (2-12) includes small rounded projections (2-17) extending radially outwards from the outer periphery (2-23) in the plane of the polyurethane ring (2-12). The elongate slides (2-16) are configured with an elongated groove shaped with a complementary profile to the projections (2-17) to enable the shock-absorbing assemblies (2-7a, 2-7b) to be held in lateral alignment. This allows the rings (2-12) to expand laterally whilst preventing the polyurethane rings (2-12) from impinging on the inner walls of the housing (2-3), i.e. maintaining the rings (2-12) centered co-axially to the striker pin (2-4), thus preventing any resultant abrasion/overheating damage to the polyurethane ring (2-12).
[0884] The elongate slides (2-16) are generally elongate rectangular panels formed from a similar elastic material to the elastic layer (2-12) e.g. polyurethane. However, preferably, the elongate slides (2-16) are formed from a much softer elastic material, i.e., with a lower modulus of elasticity. This provides two key benefits: [0885] 1. The elongate slides (2-16) wear more readily than the polyurethane annular rings (2-12). Consequently, maintenance costs are reduced as the elongate slides (2-16) may be easily replaced when worn and do not require the removal and dismantling of the shock absorbing assemblies (2-7a, 2-7b) in order to replace the annular rings (2-12) [0886] 2. The elongate slides (2-16) offer virtually no resistance to the lateral deflection of the annular rings (2-12) under load, thus avoiding the projections (2-17) becoming locally incompressible which may lead to failure thereof.
[0887] During a shock absorbing process, as the elastomer ring (2-12) deflects laterally, the projections (2-17) are forced outwards into increasing contact with the elongate slides (2-16) until the pressure reaches a point where the elongate slides (2-16) start to move parallel to the striker pin longitudinal axis in conjunction with the polyurethane ring (2-12).
[0888] As shown most clearly in
[0889]
[0890] In typical use (as shown in
[0891]
[0892] A significant degree of heat is generated in a ‘dry hit.’ However, it has been found that even several such strikes successively may avoid permanent damage to the polyurethane rings (2-12) provided a cooling period is allowed by the operator before continuing impact operations. Ideally, deformation of the polyurethane rings (2-12) is less than approximately 30% change in thickness in the direction of the applied force, though this may increase to 50% in a dry hit.
[0893]
[0894]
[0895] The embodiment as shown in
[0896] In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the guide elements in the form of elongate slides (2-16, 2-116) may be arranged on the exterior of the striker pin (2-4). It will also be appreciated that the slidable engagement between the elastic layer inner periphery (2-24) and the striker pin (2-4) may be formed by a recess on the elongate slide guide element and a protrusion on the elastic layer periphery (2-24) or vice versa
[0897]
[0898] The individual pins (2-22) may be formed in a variety of configurations including two locating pins on located on opposing sides of the inelastic layer (2-13) or as a substantially single continuous pin, fixed through the inelastic steel plate (2-13) and passing through the elastic layers (2-12) on both sides.
[0899] The elastic layer (2-12) defects both laterally outwards towards the side walls (2-27) of the nose block (2-5) and inwards towards the striker pin (2-4) under compression. The locating pins (2-22) are positioned at a point on a null-point path (2-25) between the outer (2-23) and inner (2-24) lateral periphery. As this null point (2-25) is laterally stationary during shock absorbing, there is no relative movement between the elastomer layers (2-12) and locating pin guide element (2-22) and therefore no tension, nor compression therebetween. It will be readily appreciated by one skilled in the art that alternative configurations including two or more pins (2-22) may be employed to ensure the centring of the elastic layers (2-12). The null-point path (2-25), including the positions of locating pins (2-22) (as shown in
[0900]
[0901] The tension band (2-26) may also be formed of an elastic material such as an elastomer. The portion of the tension band (2-26) passing behind each anchor point (2-29) passes through a shallow indent (2-28) in the adjacent nose block side wall (2-27), thereby preventing the band (2-26) from sliding or rolling up or down the nose bolts (2-10) during use.
[0902] The centering force applied by the tension bands (2-26) onto the elastic layer (2-12) is proportional to the degree the band (2-26) is displaced from the direct path between adjacent anchor points (2-29) by the outer periphery (2-23) of the elastic layer (2-23). The symmetrical arrangement of the anchor points (2-29) and the elastic layer (2-23) about the striker pin longitudinal axis produces a centering force about same.
[0903]
[0904]
[0905]
[0906]
[0907] The embodiment of
[0908] The reduction in the volume of elastic layers (2-12) material caused by the tapered portions (2-37) with respect to the embodiments cause shown in
[0909] Over continued use, the sides of the striker pin (2-4) wear the cap plate (2-9) and nose plate (2-11) where it passes through the nose block (2-5). Consequently, the striker pin's longitudinal axis becomes misaligned from the impact axis (2-100), bringing the shock absorbing assemblies (2-7a, 2-7b) closer to the nose block walls (2-27). To prevent a detrimental contact between the shock absorbing assemblies (2-7a, 2-7b) and the nose block walls (2-27), a degree of lateral clearance (2-32) is incorporated between either the striker pin (2-4) and the inner inelastic layer periphery (2-35) or the nose block side walls (2-27) and the outer inelastic layer periphery (2-34) (as shown in
[0910] Although the inelastic layer (2-13) is thus centred by its proximity to the circumference of the striker pin (2-4), the inelastic layer (2-13) may rotate about the striker pin (2-4) during use due to its uniform inner circular cross section. Thus, to prevent any detrimental interference between the inelastic layer (2-13) and the nose block side walls (2-27) and/or nose bolts (2-10), the inner nose block walls (2-27) are provided with a pair of substantially elongated cuboid restraining elements (2-33), placed between a pair of nose bolts (2-10) and extending laterally inwards toward the striker pin (2-4). The restraining elements (2-33) are positioned and dimensioned to be sufficiently close to the inelastic layer (2-13) to obstruct any rotation, whilst permitting movement parallel to the longitudinal impact axis (2-100). It should be noted that although the striker pin longitudinal axis and the impact axis (2-100) may diverge slightly due to wear, all the figures show the situation with no wear and thus the two axes are co-axial.
[0911] In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the inelastic layer (2-12) is configured with its outer periphery (2-34) positioned immediately adjacent at least a portion of the nose block walls (2-27) and/or nose bolts (2-10), with a clearance spacing between the inner inelastic layer periphery (2-24) and the striker pin (2-4).
[0912] Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof.
[0913] It should be appreciated that the disclosure herein encompasses embodiments where any one or more of the features, components, methods or aspects, either individually, partially or collectively of any one embodiment or aspect may be combined in any way with any other feature of any other embodiment or aspect and the disclosure herein does not exclude any possible combination unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Appendix a
[0914] Tables 1-14.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Minimum Minimum attachment weight weight reduction Max reduction to required as attachment move into percentage weight lighter of lightest Excavator (6.5x excavator attachment in weight class multiplier) class excavator (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) class 20-25 3.1-3.8 30-36 4.6-5.5 0.8 17% 40-55 6.2-8.5 0.7 11% 65-80 10-12.3 1.5 15% 100-120 15.4-18.5 3.1 20%
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Gravity Gravity Gravity Gravity Prior-Art gravity-only impact hammers: hammer 1 hammer 2 hammer 3 hammer 4 fixed drop height & hammer weight mass DX900 SS80 DX1800 SS150 Overall hammer weight (including bracket), kg 5500 9000 10500 13000 Carrier weight, kg 36,000 60,000 65,000 80,000 Carrier cost, $ 225,000 375,000 400,000 500,000 Impact energy vertical, joules 90,000 100,000 180,000 180,000 Impact energy at 45º, joules 52,376 58,196 104,753 104,753 Energy/kg of carrier weight, joules per kilo 2.5 1.7 2.8 2.3 Work done per blow vertical (=Energy.sup.1.3) 2,757 3,162 6,790 6,790 Work done per blow at 45º (=Energy.sup.1.3) 1,364 1,564 3,359 3,359 Cycles per minute 12 12 12 12 Equivalent production tonnes per hour vertical 65 75 161 161 Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 45º 32 37 80 80 Carrier cost per tonne per hour of production, vertical 3440 5000 2484 3105 Carrier cost per tonne per hour of production, at 45º 6954 10107 5021 6276
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum Assisted Impact Hammers: hammer 1 hammer 2 hammer 3 fixed drop height & hammer weight mass XT1000 XT2000 XT4000 Overall hammer weight (including bracket), kg 3600 6000 11000 Carrier weight, kg 22,500 40,000 68,000 Carrier cost, $ 150,000 250,000 440,000 Impact energy vertical, joules 100,000 210,000 440,000 Impact energy at 45º, joules 95,317 200,165 419,394 Energy/kg of carrier weight, joules per kilo 4.4 5.3 6.5 Work done per blow vertical (=Energy.sup.1.3) 3,162 8,296 21,701 Work done per blow at 45º (=Energy.sup.1.3) 2,971 7,795 20,390 Cycles per minute 16 16 15 Equivalent production tonnes per hour vertical 100 262 643 Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 45º 94 246 604 Carrier cost per tonne per hour of production, vertical 1500 953 684 Carrier cost per tonne per hour of production, at 45º 1597 1014 728
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Gravity Gravity Gravity Gravity Comparison: fixed impact hammer hammer 1 Vacuum hammer 2 Vacuum hammer 3, Vacuum hammer 4 Vacuum weight, vertical. DX90C hammer 1 SS80 hammer 2, DX1800 hammer 3, SS150 hammer 4, Overall hammer weight incl bracket, kg 5500 5500 9000 9000 10500 10500 13000 13000 Carrier weight, kg 36,000 36,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 80,000 80,000 Carrier cost, $ 225,000 225,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 600,000 600,000 Impact energy vertical, joules 90,000 185,000 100,000 360,000 180,000 410,000 180,000 550,000 Impact energy at 45º, joules 52,376 176,336 58,196 343,141 104,753 390,799 104,753 524,243 Energy/kg of carrier weight, joules per kilo 2.5 5.1 1.7 6.0 2.8 6.3 2.3 6.9 Work done per blow vertical (Energy.sup.1.3) 2,757 7,036 3,162 16,718 6,790 19,798 6,790 29,005 Work done per blow at 45º (Energy.sup.1.3) 1,364 6,611 1,564 15,708 3,359 18,601 3,359 27,252 Cycles per minute 12 20 12 18 12 18 17 Equivalent production tonnes per hour 63 268 72 573 155 678 155 939 vertical Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 31 252 36 538 77 637 77 882 45º Carrier cost per tonne per hour of 3571 840 6229 785 2901 663 3868 639 production, vertical Carrier cost per tonne per hour of 7219 894 12590 836 5864 706 7818 680 production, at 45º
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Gravity Gravity Gravity Gravity Comparison: fixed impact hammer hammer 1 Vacuum hammer 2 Vacuum hammer 3, Vacuum hammer 4 Vacuum energy per blow, vertical. DX90C hammer 5, SS80 hammer 6, DX1800 hammer 7, SS150 hammer 8, Overall hammer weight incl bracket, kg 5500 3200 9000 3600 10500 5500 13000 5500 Carrier weight, kg 36,000 21,000 60,000 22,500 65,000 36,000 80,000 36,000 Carrier cost, $ 225,000 130,000 450,000 140,000 450,000 235,000 600,000 235,000 Impact energy vertical, joules 90,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 Impact energy at 45º, joules 52,376 85,785 58,196 95,317 104,753 171,570 104,753 171,570 Energy/kg of carrier weight, joules per kilo 2.5 4.3 1.7 4.4 2.8 5.0 2.3 5.0 Work done per blow vertical (energy.sup.1.3) 2,757 2,757 3,162 3,162 6,790 6,790 6,790 6,790 Work done per blow at 45º (energy.sup.1.3) 1,364 2,591 1,564 2,971 3,359 6,379 3,359 6,379 Cycles per minute 12 20 12 20 12 20 12 20 Equivalent production tonnes per hour 63 105 72 120 155 259 155 259 vertical Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 31 99 36 113 77 243 77 243 45º Carrier cost per tonne per hour of 3571 1238 6229 1163 2901 909 3868 909 production, vertical Carrier cost per tonne per hour of 7219 1318 12590 1237 5864 967 7818 967 production, at 45º
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 6 Gravity Gravity Gravity Gravity hammer 1 Vacuum hammer 2 Vacuum hammer 3, Vacuum hammer 4 Vacuum Comparison: fixed productivity, vertical DX90C hammer 9, SS80 hammer 10, DX1800 hammer 11, SS150 hammer 12, Overall hammer weight (inc. bracket), kg 5500 2300 9000 2500 10500 3900 13000 3900 Carrier weight, kg 36,000 15,000 60,000 16,000 65,000 25,500 80,000 25,500 Carrier cost, $ 225,000 90,000 450,000 100,000 450,000 160,000 600,000 160,000 Impact energy vertical, joules 90,000 61,000 100,000 67,000 180,000 121,500 180,000 121,500 Impact energy at 45º, joules 52,376 58,143 58,196 63,862 104,753 115,810 104,753 115,810 Energy/kg of carrier weight, joules per kilo 2.5 4.1 1.7 4.2 2.8 4.8 2.3 4.8 Work done per blow vertical (energy1.3) 2,757 1,663 3,162 1,879 6,790 4,073 6,790 4,073 Work done per blow at 45º (Energy1.3) 1,364 1,563 1,564 1,765 3,359 3,827 3,359 3,827 Cycles per minute 12 20 12 20 12 20 12 20 Equivalent production tonnes per hour 63 63 72 72 155 155 155 155 vertical Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 31 60 36 67 77 146 77 146 45º Carrier cost per tonne per hour of 3571 1421 6229 1398 2901 1032 3868 1032 production, vertical Carrier cost per tonne per hour of 7219 1513 12590 1488 5864 1098 7818 1098 production, at 45º
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 7 Excavator weight class Impact Energy (Joules) Vertical impact axis (tonnes) 90,000 100,000 180,000 210,000 400,000 20-25 XT 1000 (22.5T) 30-36 DX900 (36T) 40-55 XT2000 (40T) 65-80 (SS80 60T) DX1800 XT 4000 (65T) (80T) SS150 (80T) 100-120
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 8 Gravity- vacuum- only assisted impact impact % hammer hammer difference vertical impact axis: Hammer weight, kg 1,000 330 drop height, m 3 3 Energy from weight, Joules; 30,000 10,000 kg × drop × 10 Vacuum assistance, kg ~ 670 Vacuum stroke length ~ 3 Energy from vacuum, Joules; ~ 20,000 kg × stroke × 10 Theoretical energy total, Joules 30,000 30,000 Friction losses 3,000 1,000 Air displacement losses 1,500 600 Total losses Joules 4,500 1,600 Net energy after losses, Joules 25,500 28,400 111% Work done, = net energy.sup.1.3 535,183 615,622 115% 45º impact axis Hammer weight, kg 1,000 330 drop height, m 2.12 2.12 Energy from weight, Joules; 21,200 7,070 kg × drop × 10 Vacuum assistance, kg ~ 670 Vacuum stroke length ~ 3 Energy from vacuum, Joules; ~ 20,000 kg × stroke × 10 Theoretical energy total, Joules 21,200 27,070 Friction losses 5,300 1,750 Air displacement losses 1,060 600 Total losses Joules 6,360 2,350 Net energy after losses, Joules 14,840 24,720 167% Work done, = net energy.sup.1.3 264,767 514,000 194%
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 9 Impact Gravity- Vacuum- Hammer type only Assisted Stopping Distance(mm) from 1 ms.sup.−1 50 0.02 from 2 ms.sup.−1 190 0.07 from 3 ms.sup.−1 420 0.15 from 4 ms.sup.−1 740 0.27 from 5 m/sec 0.42 Stopping time(s) from 1 ms.sup.−1 0.09 0.034 from 2 ms.sup.−1 0.19 0.068 from 3 ms.sup.−1 0.28 0.102 from 4 ms.sup.−1 0.37 0.136 from 5 m/sec 0.170 Lift time for 5 m 1.53 stroke at 3 ms.sup.−1(s) Lift time for 5 m 0.92 stroke at 5 ms.sup.−1(s) Drop time for 5 m stroke(s) 1.06 0.59 Dwell and acceleration 0.4 0.4 at bottom(s) Minimum practical 3.44 1.91 cycle time(s)
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 10 Attachment weight weight Max reduction to reduction as attachment move into percentage weight lighter of heaviest Excavator (6.5x excavator in prior weight class multiplier) class excavator (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) class 20-25 3.07-3.84 30-36 4.62-5.54 2.47 44.6% 40-55 6.15-8.46 3.84 45.4% 65-80 10-12.31 6.16 50.0% 100-120 15.38-18.46 8.46 45.8%
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 11 Vacuum Gravity Gravity Comparison: Similar productivity, hammer hammer hammer tonnes per hour. XT1200 DX1800 SS150 Overall impact hammer weight including bracket 3900 10500 13000 Carrier weight 25,500 65,000 80,000 Carrier cost 160,000 450,000 600,000 Impact energy vertical joules 120,000 180,000 180,000 Impact energy at 45ºjoules 114,380 104,753 104,753 Energy/kg of carrier weight 4.7 2.8 2.3 Work done per blow vertical (Energy.sup.1.3) 4,008 6,790 6,790 Work done per blow at 45º 3,766 3,359 3,359 Cycles per minute 20 12 12 Equivalent production tonnes per hour vertical 152 155 155 Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 45º 143 77 77
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 12 Vacuum Vacuum Gravity Gravity hammer hammer hammer hammer 3 m 4.24 m 2 m 2.82 m Comparison: Fixed head-height available for stroke stroke stroke, stroke, working, and fixed weight of impact hammer. vertical 45º vertical 45º Overall impact hammer weight including bracket 6000 6000 6000 6000 Carrier weight 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Drop height of weight 3.0 4.24 2.0 2.82 Mass of drop weight 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 Effect of vacuum (tonnes force) 3,000 3,000 0 0 Effect of angle (on drop weight only, not vacuum) 0 0.71 0 0.71 Effect of friction and air bypass 0.9 0.9 0.85 0.82 Impact energy joules 105,948 138,509 33,354 32,212 Work done per blow (Energy.sup.1.3) 3,409 4,830 759 725 Cycles per minute 20 16 15 12 Equivalent production tonnes per hour 129 147 22 17
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 13 Vacuum Gravity Comparison: Similar impact hammer hammer hammer weight and carrier weight. XT2000 DX900 Overall impact hammer weight 6000 5500 Carrier weight 40,000 36,000 Carrier cost 250,000 225,000 Impact energy vertical joules 210,000 90,000 Impact energy at 45º joules 200,165 52,376 Energy/kg of carrier weight 5.3 2.5 Work done per blow vertical (Energy.sup.1.3) 8,296 2,757 Work done per blow at 45º 7,795 1,364 Cycles per minute 20 12 Equivalent production tonnes per hour vertical 315 63 Equivalent production tonnes per hour at 45º 296 31
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 14 Accumulator performance variables System Requirements Accumulator configuration comment Very low pressure gain of Large volume of accumulator provides most constant accumulator working gas in relative to working volume power output first fluid chamber (3-8) High pressure systems Area of third piston face (3-13) Volume of first fluid is smaller than area of first chamber (3-8) needs to piston face (3-9) be large Low pressure systems Are of third piston face (3-13) is similar to area of first piston face (3-9) Long period to charge Large working gas volume in Typical reciprocating accumulator with unutilised first fluid chamber (3-8) can be cylinder application capacity (i.e. long scavenge at low pressure or excess can where return speeds period) be dumped need to be constrained- produces maximum power gain short period to charge small working gas volume in Typical regeneration accumulator with unutilised first fluid chamber (3-8) at high circuit for an excavator capacity (i.e. short scavenge pressure or the like period) Large difference between Large working volume, can be Maximum power gain scavenge pressure and pump at low pressure or excess can pressure be dumped Small additional power Second piston face (3-12) can Accumulator is small requirement be small relative to third piston and economical face (3-13) with a short stroke Large additional power Third fluid chamber (3-11) must Large power gain-high requirement be large, scavenge time must benefit from accumulator be long with low pressure requirement, area of second piston face (3-12) small relative to area of third piston face (3-13) Power delivered mainly as A large third fluid chamber Needs long scavenge extra hydraulic fluid flow (3-11) and a small second piston time face (3-12) area relative to area of third piston face (3-13) Power delivered mainly as Area of second and third piston extra pressure face as large as possible