FILTRATION SYSTEM
20230357912 · 2023-11-09
Inventors
- Maxime Brossard (Metz, FR)
- Paul DURIGHELLO (Thionville, FR)
- Friederike-Franka ALBRECHT (Bremen, DE)
- Jan-Erik HILGER (Groß Ippener, DE)
- Luc Diez (Metz, FR)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A cooling method of a travelling coated steel strip, exiting a hot-dip coating bath, including the steps of A) sucking a gas into a cooling device, B) filtering the sucked gas by a filtering system capturing at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m, C) blowing, at a velocity comprised from 1 to 80 m.s.sup.-1, the sucked and filtered gas onto the coated steel strip.
Claims
1-8. (canceled)
9. A cooling method of a travelling coated steel strip, exiting a hot-dip coating bath, the method comprising the steps of: A) sucking a gas into a cooling device; B) filtering the sucked gas via a filtering system capturing at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m; C) blowing, at a velocity from 1 to 80 m.s.sup.-1, the sucked and filtered gas onto the coated steel strip.
10. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the hot-dip coating bath comprises from 1 to 5 weight percent of magnesium and from 0.8 to 20 weight percent of aluminium, a remainder being made of zinc and inevitable impurities.
11. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein in step B) the filtering captures at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 1.0 .Math.m.
12. A cooling device of a cooling tower, the cooling device comprising: a filtration system able to capture at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m, a suction device; and at least a distribution chamber having openings, wherein a gas is able to be filtered by said filtration system and to be blown, through the openings of the distribution chamber to execute the method as recited in claim 9.
13. The cooling device as recited in claim 12 further comprising two distribution chambers, arranged on either side of a travel zone of a steel strip, able to blow the filtered gas towards a travel zone of a steel strip.
14. The cooling device as recited in claim 12 wherein the filtration system is able to capture at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 1.0 .Math.m.
15. The cooling device as recited in claim 12 wherein the filtration system includes at least a first filter able to capture at least 50% of large coarse particles and at least a second filter ble to capture at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m positioned downstream said first filter.
16. The cooling device as recited in claim 12 further comprising a suction damper able to adjust a flowrate of the blown gas.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] Other characteristics and advantages will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention.
[0012] To illustrate the invention, various embodiment will be described, particularly with reference to the following figures:
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] In the following, upstream and downstream are expressed relative to the steel strip movement.
[0020] As illustrated in
[0024] This cooling method can take place in an installation as illustrated in
[0025] Said cooling tower 4 generally comprises at least a cooling device 8 comprising at least two distribution chambers (6a and 6b) arranged on either side of the travelling strip S, a suction device 10 and a filtering system 9. Each distribution chamber comprises openings which can be slots, nozzles or point-like openings. The openings face the travelling strip such that the gas 5 exiting the distribution chamber impacts the travelling coated steel product S, such as a strip. The distribution chamber can be set in such a way that the impacts of the jets from one module are opposite the jets of the other module or in a way that the impacts of the jets of gas on each surface of the strip are distributed at the nodes of a two-dimensional network and not opposite the impact of the jets on the other face such as described in EP 2 100 673 B1. Moreover, an air knife 3 can be positioned between the cooling tower 4 and the hot-dip coating tank 2 permitting to control the amount of coating, the coating thickness, of the coated steel strip. Furthermore, as illustrated in
[0026] A gas 50 (e.g. atmospheric air) is sucked into the cooling device 8 by a suction device 10 (e.g. a fan) and pass through a filtering system 9. Alternatively, the gas can come from a tank. The gas is thus filtered by a filtering system 9 having at least the performance of an PM2.5 filter.
[0027] The filter performance mentioned in this patent comes from the standard ISO 16980. A filter having the performance of an “PM2.5” filter captures at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m. A filter having the performance of an “PM1” filter captures at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 1.0 .Math.m. Moreover, if a filter efficiency is above 50% for capturing particles having a determined size, its efficiency is rounded in 5%, to the closest, and added to the filter name. For example, if a filter captures 71% of particles having a size of at least 1 .Math.m, it is known as an ePM1 70%.
[0028] Finally, the filtered gas is blown onto the travelling steel strip through the openings of the distribution chamber 6 resulting in gas jets 5 impacting, at a velocity comprised from 1 to 80 m.s.sup.-1, said strip and thus cooling it.
[0029] Consequently, when using the claimed cooling method, the blown air onto the travelling strip is freed from most of the particles and of the particles aggregate greater than 2.5 .Math.m. This results in a severe diminution of the dark spot presence on the strip, as explained in the experimental results section.
[0030] Preferably, the sucked air passing through said filtering system capturing at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m, has a velocity of maximum 1.5 m.s.sup.-1. It permits to even increase the efficiency of the filtering system.
[0031] Preferably, said travelling strip has a thickness from 0.2 to 10 mm. It has been observed that such a method is particularly advantageous for thick strip because they are the ones more prone to form dark spots. Even more preferably, said travelling strip has a thickness from 4 to 8 mm.
[0032] Preferably, said hot-dip coating bath comprises from 1 to 5 weight percent of magnesium, from 0.8 to 20 weight percent of aluminium and the remainder of the composition being made of zinc and inevitable impurities resulting from the elaboration. Preferably, said hot-dip coating bath comprises at least 1 weight percent of aluminium and even more preferably at least 1.8 weight percent of aluminium. Preferably, said hot-dip coating bath comprises at maximum 12 weight percent of aluminium. Even more preferably said hot-dip coating bath comprises at maximum 6 weight percent of aluminium. Preferably, said hot-dip coating bath comprises less than 0.5 weight percent and even more preferably less than 0.3 weight percent of each of the following elements: boron, cobalt, chromium, copper, molybdenum, niobium, nickel, vanadium, sulfur and titanium.
[0033] Preferably, in said step A) said sucked gas is a pure gas or a mixture of gases. It can be atmospheric air or a mixture consisting of nitrogen and hydrogen or any other mixture of gases.
[0034] Preferably, in said step B) said filtering system has at least the performance of an PM1 filter.
[0035] Even more preferably, in said step B) said filtering system has at least the performance of an ePM1 65% filter. Such an ePM1 65% filter captures at least 63% of particles having a size of at least 1 .Math.m. It has been discovered by the inventors that not only particles bigger than 10 um favors the nucleation but also particles bigger than 1 .Math.m favors the nucleation of Mg.sub.2Zn.sub.11 resulting in the formation of dark spots. This is explained in the experimental results section.
[0036] Preferably, in said step B) said filtering system has at least the performance of an ePM1 80% filter. Such an ePM1 80% filter captures at least 78% of particles having a size of at least 1 .Math.m.
[0037] Preferably, in said step C) said coated steel strip has a coating being liquid. It means that the coating can be qualified as liquid coating, i.e. the coating is not solid. Apparently, the dark spots appearance is even more triggered by the impact of particles on the liquid coating.
[0038] Preferably, between said steps A and B, the cooling method comprises a step of filtering said sucked gas by means of a filtering system 9 able to capture less than 50% of particles having a size of at least 10 .Math.m. Such a step permits to pre-filter the gas filtered in step B and extends the lifespan of the filtering system 9 having at least the performance of a PM2.5 filter.
[0039] The invention, as illustrated in
[0040] This claimed cooling device 8 can be used in a cooling tower 4 of a hot-dip coating installation.
[0041] The cooling device comprises conduits 17 connecting its different parts such that all the blown gas is filtered. This is illustrated in
[0042] Preferably, as illustrated in
[0043] Preferably, as illustrated in
[0044] Preferably, as illustrated in
[0045] Preferably, said filtration system 9, of the cooling device 8, comprises at least the performance of a PM1 filter. Even more preferably, said filtration system 9 has at least the performance of an ePM1 65% filter. Even more preferably, said filtration system 9 has at least the performance of an ePM1 80% filter. Apparently, such a filtration system permits to diminish even more the dark spots presence on the coated steel strip.
[0046] Preferably, said filtration system 9 comprises at least a pocket filter. Preferably, said filtration system comprises at least a rigid type filter made from glass fibre paper or nanofiber.
[0047] Preferably, said filtration system 9, of the cooling device 8, comprises at least a first filtration able to capture at least 50% of large coarse particles and at least a filtration means able to capture at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m positioned downstream said first filtration means. In this particular case, downstream is to be understood relative to the path of the blown gas. Apparently, this permits to enhance the lifespan of the PM2.5 filter.
[0048] Preferably, said filtration system 9, of the cooling device 8, comprises at least a filtration mean able to capture at least 50% of the particles having a size of at least 2.5 .Math.m and at least a filtration means having at least the performance of a PM1 filter or ePM1 65% filter or ePM1 80% filter.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
[0049] The experiments have been done in a hot-dip coating installation, as represented in
Minimum Particle Size Impacting the Presence of Dark Spots
[0050] In this first experiment, in order to understand the impact of the size of the blown particles on the presence of dark spots, the blown air properties are changed and the numbers of dark spots per square meter of steel surface are compared. The number of dark spots is counted by visual inspection in order to estimate the presence of dark spots. For this experiment, the filtering system is able to filter particles bigger than 300 .Math.m.
[0051] This experiment is conducted for several blown gases: atmospheric air or atmospheric air charged with Al.sub.2O.sub.3 particles of 1, 3, 9 or 20 .Math.m. The air flow velocity of the blown air was of 11 m.s.sup.- 1. The results are summed up in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 particles (in .Math.m) None 0.3 1 3 10 20 Number of dark spots per m2 0 0 ~10 ~35 >100 >100
[0052] Based on the experimental results, it can clearly be observed that for the strip portion cooled by air charged with Al.sub.2O.sub.3 particles of at least 1 .Math.m, dark spots appear on the strip surface. Moreover, the bigger the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 particles, the higher the number of dark spots per m.sup.2. Consequently, in order to strongly lower the presence of dark spots, the quantity of particles of at least 9 .Math.m should be lowered as much as possible. In order to suppress the presence of dark spots, the quantity of particles of at least 1 .Math.m should be lowered as much as possible.
Comparative Results
[0053] In a second experiment, in order to assess the efficiency of the claimed process and equipments, the properties of the filtering system have been changed and the numbers of dark spots per square meter of steel surface compared. The number of dark spots is counted by an automatic inspection device.
[0054] In a first series of trials, where more than 10 coils have been produced, the filtering devices are able to filter particles bigger than 300 .Math.m. In a second series of trials where more than 10 coils have been produced, the filtering devices of the two upper cooling devices are able to filter particles bigger than 300 .Math.m and the filtering devices of the two lower cooling devices have the performance of an ePM1 65% filter. In a third series of trials, where more than 10 coils have been produced, the filtering devices of the four cooling devices have the performance of an ePM1 65% filter.
[0055] The density of dark spots on a coated steel coil is classified into three categories depending on the dark spot per square meter: less than 1 per m.sup.2, from 1 to 20 per m.sup.2 and above 20 per m.sup.2.
[0056] In the first, second and third series, the steel strips has a thickness from 4 to 6 mm
TABLE-US-00002 % of coils having <1 DS*.m.sup.-2 1-20 DS.m.sup.-2 > 20 DS.m.sup.-2 1.sup.st series 14.3 38.1 47.6 2.sup.nd series 35.3 59.6 5.1 3.sup.rd series 75 25 0
*DS = dark spot
[0057] Based on the comparative results, it is clear that the implementation of the claimed invention reduces the number of dark spots on the coated steel strip exiting the cooling tower.
[0058] The invention has been described above as to the embodiment which is supposed to be practical as well as preferable at present. However, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiment disclosed in the specification.