ENERGY HARVESTING AND STORAGE FEEDBACK CELL
20230361696 · 2023-11-09
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01M14/00
ELECTRICITY
Y02B10/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
Disclosed is a kinetic energy harvest and electrical energy storage feedback cell that combines the 2-dimensional superconductor behaviour induced by a ferroelectric-metal with a quantum. Hall Effect placed within two conductor/semiconductor materials with different chemical potentials. The feedback corresponding to external and internal conduction and tunnelling of the electrons in the cell allows the electrical potential difference to increase during discharge of the cell with a load. The feedback cell harvests kinetic energy, heat and store electrostatic and electrochemical energy that at room temperature the supercurrent can be induced during several years in feedback and can be used as part of a transistor, a computer, a photovoltaic cell or panel, a wind turbine, a vehicle, a ship, a satellite, an airplane, a remote access circuit, a building, smart grid, electric power transmission, transformers, power storage devices, electric motors and as a part of other several components or products.
Claims
1. A feedback cell, comprising: a high dielectric constant ferroelectric 2D superconductor or ferroelectric-metal disposed between two similar or dissimilar materials, wherein an electrical potential difference of the cell increases during discharge with a load from below to above room temperatures.
2. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric 2D superconductor or ferroelectric-metal comprises the materials selected from the list consisting of: R3-2yM.sub.yCli-xHal.sub.xOi-.sub.zA.sub.z with (R=Li, Na, K; M=Be, Ca, Mg, Sr, and Ba; Hal=F, Br, I; A=S, Se) and 0<y<0.5, 0<x<1, and 0<z<1, R.sub.3-3yMyCli-xHal.sub.xOi-.sub.zA.sub.z with (R=Li, Na, K; M=B, Al; Hal=F, Br, I; A=S, Se) and 0<y<0.5, 0<x<1, and 0<z<1, R3-2y-zM′yH.sub.zCli-xHal.sub.xOi-dAd (R=Li, Na, K; M′=Be, Ca, Mg, Sr, and Ba; Hal=F, Br, I; A=S, Se) and 0<y<0.5, 0<z<2, 0<x<1, and 0<d<1, R.sub.3-3y-zM′.sub.yH.sub.zCli-xHalxOi-dAd with 0<y<0.5, 0<z<2, 0<x<1, and 0<d<1, a mixture of the foregoing, a mixture of the foregoing in combination with U2S, Na2S, SiCh, Li2O, Na2O, or H2S, and a mixture of the foregoing with a polymer, a plasticizer, or a glue.
3. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric 2D superconductor or ferroelectric-metal is in contact with one or two insulator layers.
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is Na-based Na2.99Bao.oosCIO and the conductors are Cu.
7. The feedback cell of claim 6, wherein ferroelectric is the Na-based Na2.99Bao.oosCIO and the conductors are Zn and Cu.
8. The feedback cell of claim 6, wherein the ferroelectric is the Na-based Na2.99Bao.oosCIO and the conductors are Zn and C configured as a foam, a sponge, wires, nanotubes, graphene, graphite, carbon black or any other allotrope or carbon structure, with or without impurities.
9. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is a Li-based (1-x)Li2.99Bao.oosCIO+xLi3-2y-zM.sub.yH.sub.zCIO, with 0<x<1, and wherein one conductor is Li and the other is a mixture of MnCh with carbon black and a binder.
10. The feedback cell of claim 6, wherein the ferroelectric is the Na-based (1-x)Na2.99Bao.oosCIO+xNa3-2y-zM.sub.yH.sub.zCIO, with 0<x<1 and 0<z<2, and wherein one conductor is Na and the other is a mixture of NasN{circumflex over ( )}fPC h with carbon black and a binder.
11. (canceled)
12. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is a Li-based Li2.99Bao.oosCIO+U2S, the conductor is Al and the semiconductor Si.
13. (canceled)
14. The feedback cell of claim 1, further comprising two interfaces one being a semiconductor or a conductor, and the other being an insulator with a conductor contact or electron collector.
15. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is Na-based, K-based, or Li-based and the conductors are selected from the list consisting of: Zn or Cu, Li, Na, a Li alloy or composite, a Na alloy or composite, and a K alloy or a composite, and wherein the ferroelectric has a surface area in contact with an insulator.
16. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is Li-based, Li2.99Bao.oosCIO or a Li2.99Bao.oosCIO+Li3-2y-zM.sub.yH.sub.zCIO mixture or a composite, and wherein the conductor is Li or a Li alloy, and wherein the ferroelectric has a surface area in contact with an insulator.
17. The feedback cell of claim 1, further comprising two concentric wire conductors separated by a ferroelectric.
18. The feedback cell of claim 1, further comprising at least one interface between a ferroelectric and an insulator.
19. (canceled)
20. The feedback cell of claim 1, further comprising at least one interface between a ferroelectric and a superconductor.
21. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the superconductor is ZnO.
22. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is Li, K, or Na-based and wherein the superconductors are both Al or Ti or Sn, Li and Al, or Li and Ti or Sn.
23. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is Li, K, or Na-based and the superconductors are HgBazCazCusOx, FeSe, or H2S.
24. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is a ferroelectric polymer-glue mixture or a ferroelectric ionic liquid mixture.
25. The feedback cell of claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric is CaCuTiCh or a composite or a mixture of the ferroelectric materials listed in claim 2.
26. (canceled)
27. (canceled)
28. (canceled)
29. (canceled)
30. (canceled)
31. (canceled)
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0052] These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims, and accompanying drawings wherein.
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0064] The preferred embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of example below and in
[0065] In the description of the present invention, the invention will be discussed in a laboratory environment; however, this invention can be utilized for any type of applications requiring the devices 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90.
[0066] The ferroelectric material polarizes spontaneously below the Curie temperature (ferroelectric-paraelectric phase transition), and therefore, it does not depend on a temperature fluctuation or a temperature gradient to polarize giving rise to a potential difference across its ends. The potential difference ΔV=f(P) where f(P) is a non-linear function of the polarization P in which there is an indirect dependence on the temperature at the parameter level related to the dielectric constant or relative real permittivity. The ferroelectric has the ability to switch the direction and magnitude of the spontaneous polarization by reversing the applied coercive electric field, which makes it a good candidate to be used in an energy storage device as a dielectric and/or electrolyte. A ferroelectric is also piezoelectric (polarizes in response to applied mechanical stress), and a Pyroelectric. Materials that exhibit high pyroelectric coefficients are typically ferroelectric.
[0067] A key step in the superconductor phenomena is the pairing between electrons or the formation of Cooper pairs. Despite the strong Coulomb repulsion in free space, at low energy, electrons experience an effective attraction in the presence of a lattice. Thus, superconductivity essentially relies on a mechanism that simultaneously reduces the Coulomb repulsion and generates a strong attractive interaction. In simple (elemental) metals, such an attraction originates from the interchange of longitudinal phonons, which couple to the electronic density. To allow this attraction to overcome the Coulomb repulsion, however, the phonons must be much slower than the electronic motion. In terms of energy scales, this requirement implies that the Fermi energy is much larger than the Debye energy. In the intermediate frequency regime, between these two scales, the Coulomb repulsion is logarithmically suppressed, while the phonon interaction is unaffected. As a result, the net interaction between electrons may become attractive below the Debye energy.
[0068] There are two parameters that will affect 2D superconductivity. The parameters include temperature, and current density. For a cooperative motion of electrons, the control of this motion via the coalescence and alignment of the dipoles constituting the ferroelectric material may lead to the achievement of room temperature 2D superconductivity, especially if charged matter is inhomogeneous. Presently, it is believed that the mechanism of superconductivity can be induced either by bipolarons or Cooper pairing.
[0069] A bipolaron can be defined, but without limitation, as a bosonic quasiparticle consisting of two polarons.
[0070] A polaron is a fermionic quasiparticle used in condensed matter physics to understand the interactions between electrons and atoms in a solid material.
[0071] The polaron concept was firstly introduced by Landau to describe an electron moving in a dielectric crystal where the atoms move from their equilibrium positions to effectively screen the charge of an electron, known as a phonon cloud. This lowers electron mobility and increases the electron's effective mass.
[0072] A Cooper pair or BCS pair is a pair of electrons bound together at low temperatures. An arbitrarily small attraction between electrons in a metal can cause a paired state of electrons to have a lower energy than the Fermi energy, which implies that the pair is bound. In conventional (BCS) superconductors, this attraction is due to the electron-phonon interactions. The important understanding is that independent of physical mechanism, the key to observed superconductivity is the strong electron-lattice (phonon) coupling. Strong electron-lattice interactions can be obtained from the formation of an EDLC and an EDL-C′ where the electrons are restrained by two positively charged layers of A.sup.+ cations or positively charged dipoles, providing justification for a ferroelectric-induced 2D superconductivity enablement.
[0073] Control of the electronic motion via coalescence and alignment of the dipoles, constituting a ferroelectric material, may also lead to the formation of pairs of electrons, or better bipolarons, contributing to the achievement of room temperature superconductivity, namely 2D-superconductivity.
[0074] A requirement for superconductivity, namely the enablement of macroscopic quantum coherence is best described by the conventional BCS (Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer) theory. As the current flows, for example, along the surface of ferroelectric 200, positive ions or dipoles aligned at the interface of the ferroelectric 200, forming the EDL-C′, will create an attractive force between electrons which normally repel one another, due to Coulombic repulsion. Thus, electron pairs, named Cooper pairs, are formed, which subsequently condense into a single quantum mechanical state, represented by a unique wave function. This is equivalent with macroscopic quantum coherence and can be further exemplified by the creation of the ‘supercurrent’ in the ‘gap’ material of a heterojunction like 310/200 in 50, 60, and 90, 500/200 in 70, 600/200 in 80. In the present invention, under room or higher temperature conditions, the thermal agitations (fluctuations)-induced lattice vibrations (kinetic energy) will couple with the coalescent dipoles, dipoles or ions vibrations allowing the dipoles to align even further, reducing the internal resistance to the movement of ions and/or dipoles and increasing the dielectric constant to generate a virtual ‘soup’ of fluctuations, a highly non-linear, far-from-equilibrium environment at the interface of the conductor 310 and ferroelectric 200, of semiconductor 500 and ferroelectric 200, or of superconductor 600 and ferroelectric 200.
[0075] The complex interactions between a physical system and its surroundings (environment), disrupt the quantum mechanical nature of a system and render it classical under ordinary observation. This process is known as decoherence. However, it is argued that decoherence we can be retarded (delayed) (and possibly even suppressed when the physical system is decoupled from the environment) by accelerated spin and/or accelerated vibration of electrically charged matter under rapid acceleration transients. This may be the very condition to achieve a state of macroscopic quantum coherence, the idea being that the system is not let to achieve thermodynamic equilibrium, by constantly delaying the onset of relaxation to equilibrium (hence the production of maximal entropy is delayed). The system, then, may “violently” react by generating “anomalous” emergent phenomena, such as room temperature superconductivity. If for example one of the preferred embodiments like 10 is connected to a resistor, an LED, or a diode, the thermodynamic equilibrium is retarded since a current is continuously circulating in the external circuit. At 40° C., the oscillation of electrically charged matter is observed in a ferroelectric-induced 2D superconductor feedback cell 10 to 70 and 90. At room temperature, a supercurrent can be induced during several years as experienced by us during the last five years in a feedback cell such as the embodiments 10 to 70.
[0076] The Prigogine effect as discussed in the paper, “The high energy electromagnetic field generator” published in Int. J. Space Science and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015, pp. 312-317, explains that under three conditions, a chaotic system (the aforementioned ‘soup’ of fluctuations) can self-organize into an orderly state, equivalent to the state of macroscopic quantum coherence. These conditions are the existence of a highly non-linear medium (as in this case a ferroelectric material), an abrupt departure far-from-thermodynamic equilibrium, and an energy flux (caused by spontaneous alignment of the dipoles and ionic conduction due to the need to align the Fermi levels of conductor 310, semiconductor 500, or superconductor 600 with conductor 320, semiconductor 500, or superconductor 610, and the ferroelectric 200 via the external circuit) to maintain the process of self-organization (order from chaos). This shows that the present invention has macroscopic quantum coherence as observed in
[0077] It is possible that the key to superconductivity is the enablement of local macroscopic quantum coherence, namely the ability of a macroscopic object to act as if quantum mechanical in nature exhibiting such phenomena as superposition, entanglement, or tunnelling. In summary, one can argue that the synthesis of two physical mechanisms, namely the Cooper effect (or bipolaron formation), and the Prigogine effect leads directly to the possibility of room to high temperature 2D superconductivity, at least in the preferred embodiments. Therefore, the supercurrent may be generated along the interface (boundary) between the conductor 310, semiconductor 500, or superconductor 600 and a ferroelectric 200.
[0078] The pyroelectric effect offers another interesting solid-state approach for harvesting ambient thermal energy to power distributed networks of sensors and actuators that are remotely located or otherwise difficult to access. There have been, however, few device-level demonstrations due to challenges in converting spatial temperature gradients into temperature oscillations necessary for pyroelectric energy harvesting.
[0079] The decoupling of phonon and electron transport is essential in Thermoelectric cells; For example, in relaxor ferroelectrics, nano-polar regions associated with intrinsic localized phonon modes provide glass-like phonon characteristics due to the large levels of phonon scattering which is highly welcome for achieving the binomial feature ‘electron-crystal phonon-glass’ for an “ideal” TE with a high figure of merit as described above in the background section.
[0080] An important inference is that the “best” Thermoelectric requires high electronic carrier concentrations, ˜10.sup.18 to ˜10.sup.21 cm.sup.−3, i.e. 10.sup.20 cm.sup.−3, associated with high electrical conductivity. These are similar conditions to those necessary for a feedback cell to work at constant temperature. Therefore, enabling the superimposition of both the feedback and TE phenomena in an embodiment 40.