Method for increasing the traffic flow density at a traffic light intersection
11816986 · 2023-11-14
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G08G1/082
PHYSICS
H04W4/44
ELECTRICITY
G08G1/096725
PHYSICS
G08G1/083
PHYSICS
G08G1/166
PHYSICS
G08G1/096783
PHYSICS
International classification
G08G1/082
PHYSICS
G08G1/083
PHYSICS
Abstract
A method for increasing the traffic flow density at a traffic light intersection is disclosed in which vehicles driving straight ahead and vehicles turning left may pass the traffic light intersection simultaneously, wherein the vehicles driving straight ahead are partly equipped vehicles having a Car2X communication, an automatic longitudinal control and a control unit. To increase the traffic flow density, the number of waiting vehicles turning left is transmitted to the equipped vehicles driving straight ahead. Time gaps between the vehicles driving straight ahead is set in dependence upon the number of vehicles turning left by the control unit and the automatic longitudinal control, such that a first share of the time gaps are safety time gaps, which respectively correspond to the required safety distance, and the second share of the time gaps are critical time gaps, which permit at least one vehicle turning left to turn collision-free.
Claims
1. A method for increasing the traffic flow density at a traffic light intersection with a traffic light phase in which vehicles driving straight ahead and vehicles turning left may pass the traffic light intersection simultaneously, wherein the vehicles driving straight ahead have the right of way in conformity with traffic regulations and are, at least in part, equipped vehicles having a Car2X communication, an automatic longitudinal control, and a control unit, comprising: transmitting the number of waiting vehicles turning left N.sub.IaF to the equipped vehicles driving straight ahead using the Car2X communication; and setting time gaps between the vehicles driving straight ahead in dependence upon the number of vehicles turning left using the control unit and the automatic longitudinal control, such that a first share of the time gaps are safety time gaps, which respectively correspond to a required safety distance, and a second share of the time gaps are critical time gaps, which permit at least one vehicle turning left to turn collision-free.
2. The method of claim 1, comprising shortening inefficient time gaps that are longer than the safety time gaps and shorter than the critical time gaps to safety time gaps or extending to critical time gaps through an automatic longitudinal control of the equipped vehicles driving straight ahead.
3. The method of claim 1, comprising setting the critical time gaps as efficient critical time gaps that permit a single vehicle turning left or multiple vehicles turning left to turn.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the vehicles driving straight ahead form a line, the length of which is not or is only insignificantly changed by the setting or changing of the time gaps within the line between individual vehicles as safety time gaps and/or critical time gaps.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the line of the vehicles driving straight ahead forms multiple vehicle convoys, wherein the time gaps between vehicles of a vehicle convoy are safety time gaps, such that the critical time gaps are formed between two vehicle convoys.
6. The method of claim 1, comprising adjusting the number of vehicle convoys N.sub.FK per line of vehicles driving straight ahead to the number of vehicles turning left.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein a group of multiple equipped vehicles that are following a non-equipped vehicle form a convoy, wherein the convoy leader is configured to determine the distance between the vehicle driving ahead and the vehicle driving ahead of that vehicle, such that the convoy leader sets a safety time gap or a critical time gap to the vehicle driving ahead, as needed.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the traffic light intersection is equipped with a Car2X communication.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the assignment of the vehicles driving straight ahead to convoys is performed before crossing the traffic light intersection and the assignment of the vehicles to convoys is terminated after crossing the traffic light intersection.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein for traffic light intersections with two or more lanes for vehicles driving straight ahead, a lateral synchronization of the vehicles occurs, especially of the vehicle convoys, such that critical time gaps are arranged parallel to one another or are arranged staggered at an offset to one another, which permits at least one vehicle turning left to turn collision-free at traffic light intersections with two or more lanes.
11. The method of claim 2, comprising setting the critical time gaps as efficient critical time gaps that permit a single vehicle turning left or multiple vehicles turning left to turn.
12. The method of claim 2, wherein the vehicles driving straight ahead form a line, the length of which is not or is only insignificantly changed by the setting or changing of the time gaps within the line between individual vehicles as safety time gaps and/or critical time gaps.
13. The method of claim 3, wherein the vehicles driving straight ahead form a line, the length of which is not or is only insignificantly changed by the setting or changing of the time gaps within the line between individual vehicles as safety time gaps and/or critical time gaps.
14. The method of claim 2, wherein the line of the vehicles driving straight ahead forms multiple vehicle convoys, wherein the time gaps between vehicles of a vehicle convoy are safety time gaps, such that the critical time gaps are formed between two vehicle convoys.
15. The method of claim 3, wherein the line of the vehicles driving straight ahead forms multiple vehicle convoys, wherein the time gaps between vehicles of a vehicle convoy are safety time gaps, such that the critical time gaps are formed between two vehicle convoys.
16. The method of claim 4, wherein the line of the vehicles driving straight ahead forms multiple vehicle convoys, wherein the time gaps between vehicles of a vehicle convoy are safety time gaps, such that the critical time gaps are formed between two vehicle convoys.
17. The method of claim 1, comprising adjusting the number of vehicle convoys N.sub.FK per line of vehicles driving straight ahead to the number of vehicles turning left, wherein the following is true for the number of the vehicle convoys N.sub.FK and the number of waiting vehicles turning left N.sub.IaF:N.sub.FK=1.
18. The method of claim 2, comprising adjusting the number of vehicle convoys N.sub.FK per line of vehicles driving straight ahead to the number of vehicles turning left.
19. The method of claim 3, comprising adjusting the number of vehicle convoys N.sub.FK per line of vehicles driving straight ahead to the number of vehicles turning left.
20. The method of claim 4, comprising adjusting the number of vehicle convoys N.sub.FK per line of vehicles driving straight ahead to the number of vehicles turning left.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DESCRIPTION
(6) The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features will be apparent from the description, drawings, and from the claims.
(7) In the following description of embodiments of the invention, specific details are described in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the instant description.
(8) In some embodiments, it is provided that first the number of waiting vehicles turning left is transmitted to the equipped vehicles driving straight ahead by means of Car2X communication. Next, the time gaps between the vehicles driving straight ahead is set by means of the control unit and the automatic longitudinal control in dependence upon the number of vehicles turning left, such that a first share of the time gaps are safety time gaps, which respectively correspond to the required safety distance and the second share of the time gaps are critical time gaps, which permit at least one vehicle turning left to turn collision-free. Because the inefficient time gaps are either enlarged to critical time gaps or shortened to safety time gaps as the case may be, the traffic flow density in the stream of the vehicles driving straight ahead is ideally increased and otherwise only reduced insignificantly at most. Conversely, the traffic flow densities in the stream of vehicles turning left can be significantly increased, which increases the efficiency of such a traffic light intersection many times over.
(9) Various embodiments are provided in the following and in the dependent claims.
(10) In some embodiments, it is provided that inefficient time gaps longer than the safety time gaps and shorter than the critical time gaps are shortened to safety time gaps or extended to critical time gaps by an automatic longitudinal guidance of the equipped vehicles driving straight ahead. In this context, the equipped vehicles can be accelerated to shorten the time gaps or braked to enlarge the time gaps.
(11) The critical time gaps are for example set as efficient critical time gaps, which permit the turning of a single or multiple left-turning vehicles. Critical time gaps that are, on the one hand, significantly too long to permit a vehicle turning left to turn collision-free and on the other hand, which are too short to permit two vehicles turning left to turn collision-free, are extended or shortened into efficient critical time gaps as needed through the longitudinal guidance of the equipped vehicles.
(12) In some embodiments, it is provided that the vehicles driving straight ahead form a line, the length of which is not or is only insignificantly changed by setting or changing the internal time gaps between individual vehicles to safety time gaps and/or critical time gaps. As a result of this, the traffic flow density in the lane of the vehicles driving straight ahead is not affected and can be essentially preserved.
(13) In some embodiments, it is provided for controlling the method that the line of the vehicles driving straight ahead forms multiple vehicle convoys, wherein the time gaps between vehicles of a vehicle convoy are safety gaps, such that the critical time gaps are formed between two vehicle convoys. In this context, it is for example provided that the number of vehicle convoys per line N.sub.FK of vehicles driving straight ahead is adjusted to the number of vehicles turning left N.sub.IaF, wherein for example the following is true for the number of vehicle convoys N.sub.FK and the number N.sub.IaF of waiting vehicles turning left:
N.sub.FK=N.sub.IaF+1.
(14) Insofar as due to the prevailing traffic situation there is a disproportionately high number of waiting vehicles turning left, admittedly not every time gap between the equipped vehicles is expanded into critical time gaps, since the preservation of the traffic flow density in the stream of vehicles driving straight ahead has priority. In such a situation, merely suitable inefficient time gaps are extended into critical time gaps, such that the length of the line of vehicles driving straight ahead is not or is only insignificantly changed.
(15) Because non-equipped vehicles that do not have Car2X communication or automatic longitudinal control also participate in road traffic along with equipped vehicles, it is provided according to some embodiments that a group of multiple equipped vehicles that are following a non-equipped vehicle form a convoy. In this context, the convoy leader is set up to determine the distance between the vehicle driving ahead and the vehicle driving ahead of that vehicle, such that the convoy leader sets a safety gap or a critical time gap to the vehicle driving ahead, as needed. In other words, the convoy leader is set up to determine the distance of at least two vehicles driving ahead. If the distance between the two vehicles driving ahead does not correspond to a critical time gap, the equipped vehicle defined as convoy leader sets a critical time gap to the vehicle driving immediately ahead, if needed.
(16) It may be provided that the traffic light intersection is also equipped with a Car2X communication, such that the traffic light intersection is able to inform the vehicles driving straight ahead of the number of vehicles turning left. In particular, sensor devices are provided with which the traffic light intersection can additionally determine whether non-equipped vehicles are among waiting vehicles turning left, such that corresponding critical time gaps in the stream of the vehicles driving straight ahead can be set for these vehicles as well.
(17) The assignment of the vehicles driving straight ahead to convoys is for example performed before they cross the traffic light intersection and the assignment of the vehicles into convoys is terminated after they cross the traffic light intersection. Thus, merely a temporary assignment of the vehicles to convoys results and the automatic longitudinal control engages only when approaching a traffic light intersection and while driving through it. Other than this, the longitudinal control of the vehicles is controlled in another manner, such as by the drivers of the vehicles themselves.
(18) In the case of traffic light intersections with two or more lanes for vehicles driving straight ahead, for example a lateral—i.e., a sideways—synchronization of the vehicles is provided, especially of the vehicle convoys, such that the critical time gaps are arranged parallel to one another or are arranged staggered at an offset ΔT to one another, which permits at least one vehicle turning left to turn collision-free in the case of traffic light intersections with four or more lanes. The lateral synchronization is also performed before crossing the traffic light intersection and terminated after crossing the traffic light intersection.
(19) Further embodiments of the present invention are explained in the following with reference to the FIGS. Specific references to components, process steps, and other elements are not intended to be limiting. Further, it is understood that like parts bear the same or similar reference numerals when referring to alternate FIGS.
(20) The initial situation at traffic light intersections known from the prior art is shown in
(21)
(22) Analogous to
(23)
(24)
(25) The present description applies to driving on the right. For driving on the left, the discussed directions of travel are to be adapted to the corresponding provisions of the applicable road traffic regulations.
LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
(26) 1, 1′ Traffic light intersection 2, 2′ Line 3 Vehicles driving straight ahead 4 Vehicles turning left 5 Equipped vehicles driving straight ahead 6 Car2x communication 7 Control unit 8 Automatic longitudinal control 9.sub.1, . . . , 4 Convoys 10 Traffic light 11 Arrow direction N.sub.FK Number of convoys N.sub.IaF Number of vehicles turning left SZL Safety time gaps iZL Inefficient time gaps GZL Critical time gaps ΔT Offset
(27) The invention has been described in the preceding using various exemplary embodiments. Other variations to the disclosed embodiments may be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single processor, module or other unit or device may fulfil the functions of several items recited in the claims.
(28) The term “exemplary” used throughout the specification means “serving as an example, instance, or exemplification” and does not mean “preferred” or “having advantages” over other embodiments. The term “in particular” used throughout the specification means “serving as an example, instance, or exemplification”.
(29) The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims or embodiments does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.