Electrical system comprising a redundant electrical transmission path and means for recognizing an error state thereof, and method for recognizing an error state of the redundant electrical transmission path of the electrical system

Abstract

An electrical system includes a first electrical device, a second electrical device, a redundant electrical transmission path having two electrical connecting lines, connected in parallel, between the two electrical devices, and means for recognizing an error state of the redundant electrical transmission path). The means encompass a magnetic core having a primary conductor including at least half a winding loop, which is formed by one of the two connecting lines, and a secondary winding having a winding count greater than the number of winding loops of the primary conductor, and a diagnostic device for evaluating an inductance-dependent measurement signal of the secondary winding. The diagnostic device is designed to compare the inductance-dependent measurement signals of the secondary winding to a comparison value, in particular an error threshold value, that can be used to distinguish between the error state and a non-error state of the redundant electrical transmission path.

Claims

1. An electrical system (1), comprising: a first electrical device (2); a second electrical device (3); a redundant electrical transmission path (4) comprising two electrical connecting lines (L1, L2), connected in parallel, between the first electrical device (2) and the second electrical device (3); and means (MK, W1, W2, 5) for recognizing an error state of the redundant electrical transmission path (4), encompassing a magnetic core (MK) comprising a primary conductor (P) including at least half a winding loop (W1), which is formed by one of the two connecting lines (L1, L2), and a secondary winding (W2) having a winding count (N2) greater than the number (N1) of winding loops (W1) of the primary conductor (P), and a diagnostic device (5) for evaluating an inductance-dependent measurement signal of the secondary winding (W2), the diagnostic device (5) being designed to compare the inductance-dependent measurement signals (L.sub.M) of the secondary winding (W2) to a comparison value, in particular an error threshold value, that can be used to distinguish between the error state and a non-error state of the redundant electrical transmission path (4).

2. The electrical system (1) according to claim 1, wherein the primary conductor (P) is designed to be lower resistance than the secondary winding (W2).

3. The electrical system (1) according to claim 1, wherein the connecting lines (L1, L2) are designed as supply lines for supplying energy.

4. The electrical system (1) according to claim 1, wherein the connecting lines (L1,L2) are designed as signal lines.

5. The electrical system according to claim 1, wherein the comparison value is a measure of the change of the measurement signal over time.

6. A method for recognizing an error state of a redundant electrical transmission path (4) comprising two electrical connecting lines (L1, L2), connected in parallel, between a first electrical device (2) and a second electrical device (3) as well as a measuring inductor (L), which is inductively coupled to at least half a winding loop (W1), which is formed by one of the two connecting lines (L1, L2), comprising the following method steps: generating an inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M) of the measuring inductor (L); evaluating the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M) for distinguishing an error state from a non-error state of the redundant electrical transmission path (4) in that the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M) of the measuring inductor (L) is compared to a comparison value, in particular an error threshold value, that can be used to distinguish between an error state and a non-error state of the redundant electrical transmission path (4); indicating that a non-error state is present when the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M) (L.sub.M) is smaller than the comparison value; and indicating that an error state is present in one of the connecting lines (L1, L2) when the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M) (L.sub.M) is greater than the comparison value.

7. The method according to claim 5, wherein an attenuation value of an RL low-pass filter or RL high-pass filter or LC filter, which is formed by means of the secondary winding (W2), is ascertained as the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M).

8. The method according to claim 5, wherein a resonance frequency of a resonant circuit, which is formed by means of the secondary winding (W2), is ascertained as the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M).

9. The method according to claim 5, wherein the signal deformation of a control signal, which is applied to the secondary winding (W2) and has a plurality of frequency components, is ascertained as the inductance-dependent measurement signal (L.sub.M).

Description

[0028] The invention is described hereafter in detail based on exemplary embodiments with reference to the accompanying figures. In the drawings:

[0029] FIG. 1 shows a circuit diagram of an electrical system according to the invention;

[0030] FIG. 2 shows a schematic detailed illustration of the magnetic core MK according to FIG. 1; and

[0031] FIG. 3 shows a circuit diagram of a further electrical system according to the invention.

[0032] Even though mention is always made of an error threshold value in the following figures and the associated description, it is possible, as explained at the outset, to also use the degree of the change of the measurement signal over time, instead of an error threshold value, for error detection, for example so as to detect creeping changes in the redundant transmission path.

[0033] The electrical system 1 according to FIG. 1 comprises a first electrical device 2 and a second electrical device 3, which are electrically connected to one another by means of a redundant electrical transmission path 4. This electrical transmission path 4 is composed of two electrical connecting lines L1 and L2, which are connected in parallel via nodes K1 and K2.

[0034] The first electrical device 2 is electrically connected to the node K1, so that this node K1 is situated outside the first electrical device 2. It is also possible for this node K1 to be situated inside the first electrical device 2 (dotted representation of the first electrical device 2).

[0035] The second electrical device 3 is electrically connected to the node K2, so that this node K2 is situated outside the second electrical device 3. It is also possible for this node K2 to be situated inside the second electrical device 3 (dotted representation of the second electrical device 3).

[0036] For example, the first electrical device 2 is an airbag control unit, and the second electrical device 3 is an airbag module, which is supplied with electrical energy or with a current signal, serving as the deployment signal, via the two connecting lines L1 and L2 of the redundant electrical transmission path 4. In the first case, the two connecting lines L1 and L2 represent power supply lines, and in the second case, they represent signal lines.

[0037] The electrical system 1 comprises means by way of which a defect, for example a line break, of one of the two connecting lines L1 or L2 is recognized or detected. Using these means, an error state, that is, a defect, or a non-error state of the electrical transmission path 4 is detected.

[0038] These means encompass a magnetic core MK, which comprises a primary conductor P including at least half a winding loop W1 and a secondary winding W2. The primary conductor P is formed by the connecting line L2 and has only few winding loops W1, for example three (N1=3) winding loops W1, while the winding count N2 of the secondary winding W2 is greater than the number N1 of the winding loops W1. Thus, if the number is N1=3, the winding count N2 of the secondary winding W2 is 30, for example.

[0039] The secondary winding W2 is inductively strongly coupled to the primary conductor P via the magnetic core MK, as a result of which the inductance of the secondary winding W2 depends on the state of the electrical transmission path 4, that is, whether a defect, this being a line break, of the electrical connecting line L1 and/or of the electrical connecting line L2 is present. The secondary winding W2 is therefore also referred to as a measuring inductor L. The coupling of the secondary winding W2 to the primary conductor P depends on the geometry and the material of the magnetic core MK and on the arrangement of the primary conductor P and the secondary winding W2.

[0040] The primary conductor has only few winding loops W1, and in the simplest case, the primary conductor P is only composed of a straight section of the connecting line L2. In this way, it is ensured that the primary conductor P is low-resistance, that is, is in the range of 100 mΩ or less, as a result of which the transformer, which is formed by the magnetic core MK together with the primary conductor P and the secondary winding W2, has no negative influence on the function of the electrical system 1, in particular since the loop impedance of the primary conductor P remains very small in the error-free case of the electrical transmission path 4, that is, when no defect is present.

[0041] A diagnostic device 5 is provided as a further means for detecting a defect, for example a line break, of one of the two connecting lines L1 or L2, which is connected to the secondary winding W2, serving as a measuring inductor L, and by way of which an inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M, generated by the measuring inductor L, is evaluated for distinguishing between an error state and a non-error state of the redundant electrical transmission path 4. For this purpose, the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M is compared to an error threshold value.

[0042] If no defect, that is, the non-error state, of the two electrical connecting lines L1 and L2 is present, that is, if the redundancy of the transmission path 4 is present, the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M indicates low inductance, which is thus smaller than the error threshold value.

[0043] If, in contrast, one of the two electrical connecting lines L1 and L2 has a defect, and in particular a line break, as the error state, that is, if the redundancy of the transmission path 4 is not present, high inductance is indicated by the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M, which is thus greater than the error threshold value.

[0044] Various methods exist for generating the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M.

[0045] A first option for generating an inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M is to apply a known alternating voltage to the measuring inductor L, and to evaluate the alternating current generated thereby, serving as the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M. Using the reactance determined from the amplitude and the phase position of the measured alternating current, serving as the comparison value, a comparison is carried out to the error threshold value. If the comparison value is smaller than the error threshold value, a non-error state of the transmission path 4, that is, no line break, is present, while an error state, that is, for example, a line break of one of the two electrical connecting lines L1 or L2 of the transmission path 4, is present in the case of a comparison value that is greater than the error threshold value.

[0046] The diagnostic device 5 thus has the quality of indicating the state of the transmission path 4 as a function of the evaluated inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M, that is, as to whether a line break is present or is not present, this being either “redundancy is present” or “redundancy is not present”.

[0047] Another method for generating the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M is to determine the attenuation behavior of a low-pass filter or high-pass filter created with the aid of the secondary winding W2. An attenuation value, serving as the comparison value, is ascertained from the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M indicating the attenuation behavior and is compared to an accordingly suitable error threshold value.

[0048] In the case of an attenuation value that is smaller than the error threshold value, the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M indicates low inductance of the measuring inductor L, that is, a non-error state is present, this being no defect, such as a line break of the transmission path 4. In the other case, this being an attenuation value that is above the error threshold value, the inductance-dependent measurement signal indicates high inductance, that is, an error state is present, this being a defect, such as a line break of the transmission path 4.

[0049] A further method for generating the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M involves creating an LC resonant circuit by way of the measuring inductor L, so that the resonant behavior thereof is indicated by way of the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M, and from this the resonance frequency is ascertained, serving as the comparison value, so as to be compared to an accordingly suitable error threshold value.

[0050] Finally, it is also possible to detect and evaluate signal deformations of a control signal, which is applied to the measuring inductor L and has multiple frequency components, by means of the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M. In particular, the time curve when switching the secondary winding on and/or off can be detected for this purpose and be evaluated with respect to the build-up events and/or decay events.

[0051] This method can, for example, be implemented in such a way that a control signal, in the form of a square wave signal, is applied to the measuring inductor L. The edge profile generated by the control signal is detected as the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M, and the degree of distortion of the edge profile of the control signal is evaluated, since this degree of distortion is dependent on the inductance L.sub.M of the measuring inductor L, and thus on the state of the two electrical connecting lines L1 and L2. The degree of distortion, serving as the comparison value, is compared to an appropriate error threshold value.

[0052] In the case of a degree of distortion that is smaller than the error threshold value, the inductance-dependent measurement signal L.sub.M indicates low inductance of the measuring inductor L, that is, a non-error state is present, this being no defect, such as a line break of the transmission path 4. In the other case, this being a degree of distortion that is above the error threshold value, the inductance-dependent measurement signal indicates high inductance, that is, an error state is present, this being a defect, such as a line break of the transmission path 4.

[0053] The state of the two electrical connecting lines L1 and L2 is indicated as a function of the ascertained degree of distortion of the control signal, that is, whether a line break is present or not present, this being either “redundancy is present” or “redundancy is not present”.

[0054] FIG. 2 shows an electrical system 1 according to FIG. 1, however without the two electrical devices 2 and 3, with the transformer, which is formed by the magnetic core MK together with the primary conductor P and the secondary winding W2, being shown in a more detailed design. The signaling or power direction of the redundant electrical transmission path 4 is denoted by reference sign R.

[0055] According to FIG. 2, the magnetic core MK is designed as a ring core and surrounds the line L2 of the redundant electrical transmission path 4. As a result, the primary conductor P is only made of half a winding loop W1, which thus represents a straight section of the electrical connecting line L1. The secondary winding W2 arranged on the magnetic core MK designed as a ring core is made of a winding count N2 (for example 10 windings) greater than the winding count N1 of the primary conductor P.

[0056] FIG. 3 also shows an electrical system according to FIG. 1, however without the two electrical devices 2 and 3. In this FIG. 3 as well, the signaling or power direction of the redundant electrical transmission path 4 is denoted by reference sign R.

[0057] The means for recognizing an error state or a non-error state, in this electrical system 1 according to FIG. 3, likewise encompass a magnetic core MK comprising a primary conductor P including multiple winding loops W1 and a secondary winding W2 having a winding count N2 that is greater than the winding count N1 of the primary conductor P, and a diagnostic device 5.

[0058] The difference between the electrical system 1 according to FIG. 3 and that according to FIG. 1 is that the two electrical connecting lines L1 and L2 are each connected at the end to a winding end of the winding loops W1, and a center tap M forms the node K1, which is electrically connected to a second electrical device, which is not shown. Corresponding to the electrical system 1 according to FIG. 1, the node K1 is connected to a first electrical device.

LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS

[0059] 1 electrical system [0060] 2 first electrical device [0061] 3 second electrical device [0062] 4 redundant electrical transmission path [0063] 5 diagnostic device [0064] K1 node [0065] K2 node [0066] L1 electrical connecting line [0067] L2 electrical connecting line [0068] MK magnetic core [0069] N1 number of winding loops W1 [0070] N2 winding count of the secondary winding W2 [0071] M center tap of the winding loop W1 [0072] P primary conductor [0073] R signaling or power direction [0074] W1 winding loop of the primary conductor P [0075] W2 secondary winding